Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-m259h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-07T14:39:33.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2025

Edited by
Sarah Parker
Sarah Parker
Affiliation:
Loughborough University
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Michael Field in Context , pp. 340 - 348
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Primary Sources

Note: Bradley and Cooper published several individual poems and short prose pieces in periodicals. A comprehensive list of these can be found in Treby’s, Ivor C. The Michael Field Catalogue: A Book of Lists (Padstow: De Blackland Press, 1998), 93–103.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

The New Minnesinger and Other Poems. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1875.Google Scholar
Bellerophôn, Poems. London: C. Kegan Paul, 1881.Google Scholar
Callirrhoë: Fair Rosamund. London: George Bell & Sons, 1884.Google Scholar
The Father’s Tragedy, William Rufus, Loyalty or Love? London: George Bell & Sons, 1885.Google Scholar
Brutus Ultor. London: George Bell & Sons, 1886.Google Scholar
‘An Old Couple’, Contemporary Review 51 (February 1887), 220–25.Google Scholar
Canute the Great, The Cup of Water. London: George Bell & Sons, 1887.Google Scholar
Long Ago. London: George Bell & Sons, 1889.Google Scholar
‘Mid-Age’, Contemporary Review 56 (September 1889), 431–32.Google Scholar
‘A Lumber-Room’, Contemporary Review 57 (January 1890), 98–102.Google Scholar
‘Effigies’, Art Review 3 (March 1890), 89–91.Google Scholar
The Tragic Mary. London: George Bell & Sons, 1890.Google Scholar
Sight and Song. London: Elkin Mathews and John Lane, 1892.Google Scholar
Stephania, a Trialogue. London: Elkin Mathews and John Lane, 1892.Google Scholar
A Question of Memory. London: Elkin Mathews and John Lane, 1893.Google Scholar
Underneath the Bough. London: George Bell and Sons, 1893 [followed by a second, revised and decreased edition later that year].Google Scholar
Attila, My Attila! A Play. London: Elkin Mathews, 1895.Google Scholar
‘Equal Love’, The Pageant 1 (1896), 189–224.Google Scholar
‘The Fate of the Crossways’, The Dial 5 (1897), 11.Google Scholar
Underneath the Bough. Portland, ME: Thomas B. Mosher, 1898 [third, American edition].Google Scholar
The World at Auction. London: Hacon & Ricketts, 1898.Google Scholar
Noontide Branches: A Small Sylvan Drama. Oxford: Henry Daniel, 1899.Google Scholar
Anna Ruina. London: David Nutt, 1899.Google Scholar
The Race of Leaves. London: Hacon & Ricketts, 1901.Google Scholar
Julia Domna. London: Hacon & Ricketts, 1903.Google Scholar
Wild Honey from Various Thyme. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1908.Google Scholar
Poems of Adoration. Edinburgh: Sands & Co, 1912.Google Scholar
Mystic Trees. London: Eveleigh Nash, 1913.Google Scholar
Whym Chow: Flame of Love. London: Eragny Press, 1914.Google Scholar
Borgia. London: A. H. Bullen, 1905.Google Scholar
Queen Mariamne. London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1908.Google Scholar
The Tragedy of Pardon, Diane. London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1911 [latter play entitled ‘Dian’ inside volume].Google Scholar
Tristan de Léonois, The Accuser, A Messiah. London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1911Google Scholar
Dedicated. London: George Bell & Sons, 1914.Google Scholar
Ras Byzance, Deirdre, A Question of Memory. London: Poetry Bookshop, 1918 [the latter play is a revision of the 1893 original].Google Scholar
In The Name of Time. London: Poetry Bookshop, 1919.Google Scholar
A Selection from the Poems of Michael Field, edited by Sturge Moore, T.. London: Poetry Bookshop, 1923.Google Scholar
Above Mount Alverna, Iphignia in Arsacia, The Assumption. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1930.Google Scholar
The Wattlefold: Unpublished Poems. Collected by Fortey, Emily C., with preface by Vincent McNabb. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1930.Google Scholar
For That Moment Only and Other Prose Works, edited by Murray, Alex and Parker, Sarah. Cambridge: MHRA, 2022.Google Scholar
Andrews, Kit. ‘The Figure of Watteau in Walter Pater’s “Prince of Court Painters” and Michael Field’s Sight and Song’. English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920 53, no. 4 (2010): 451–84.Google Scholar
Barrera-Medrano, Leire. ‘“St. Theresa, I Call on You to Help”: Michael Field and Spanish Mysticism’, in Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, edited by Parker, Sarah and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, 210–29. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Bickle, Sharon. ‘Edith Cooper’s Sin: Mapping the Willful Bodies of Michael Field’, in The Routledge Handbook of Victorian Scandals in Literature and Culture, edited by Ayres, Brenda and Maier, Sarah E., 425–37. New York: Routledge, 2022.Google Scholar
Bickle, Sharon. ‘Disability and Gender in the Visual Field: Seeing the Subterranean Lives of Michael Field’s William Rufus’. Victorian Literature and Culture 40, no. 1 (2012): 137–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickle, Sharon, ed. The Fowl and the Pussycat: Love Letters of Michael Field, 1876–1909. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Bickle, Sharon. ‘Rethinking Michael Field: The Case for the Bodleian Letters’, in Michael Field and Their World, edited by Stetz, Margaret D. and Wilson, Cheryl A., 39–48. High Wycombe: Rivendale Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Blain, Virginia. ‘“Michael Field, the Two-Headed Nightingale”: Lesbian Text as Palimpsest’. Women’s History Review 5, no. 2 (1996): 239–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boggs, Colleen Glenney. ‘Love Triangle with Dog: Whym Chow, “the Michael Fields”, and the Poetic Potential of Human Animal Bonds’, in Animalities: Literary and Cultural Studies beyond the Human, edited by Lunblad, Michael, 190–210. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bristow, Joseph. ‘“Unwomanly Audacities”: Attila, My Attila! Sexual Modernity, and the London Stage’, in Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, edited by Parker, Sarah and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, 123–50. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Bristow, Joseph. ‘Michael Field: In Their Time and Ours’. Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature 29, no.1 (2010): 159–79.Google Scholar
Bristow, Joseph. ‘Michael Field’s Lyrical Aestheticism: Underneath the Bough’, in Michael Field and Their World, edited by Stetz, Margaret D. and Wilson, Cheryl A., 49–62. High Wycombe: Rivendale Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Janis McLarren. ‘Observing the Dead in Michael Field’s Ekphrastic Poetry’. Victorian Poetry 55, no. 2 (2017): 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conley, Susan. ‘“Poet’s Right”: Christina Rossetti as Anti-Muse and the Legacy of the “Poetess”’. Victorian Poetry 33 (1994): 365–86.Google Scholar
Dau, Duc. ‘“Stronger than Death”: The Song of Songs in Michael Field’s Poetry and Life-Writing’. Religion and Literature 50, no. 1/2 (2018): 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dever, Carolyn. One Soul We Divided: A Critical Edition of the Diary of Michael Field. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dever, Carolyn. Chains of Love and Beauty: The Diary of Michael Field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Delaney, J. G. Paul, ed. Some Letters from Charles Ricketts and Charles Shannon to ‘Michael Field’ (1894–1902). Edinburgh: Tragara Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Donoghue, Emma. We Are Michael Field. Bath: Absolute Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dytor, Frankie. ‘“The Eyes of an Intellectual Vampire”: Michael Field, Vernon Lee, and Female Masculinities in Late Victorian Aestheticism’. Journal of Victorian Culture 26, no. 4 (2021): 582–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastham, Andrew. ‘Bacchic Transference and Ecstatic Faith: Michael Field’s Callirrhoë and the Origins of Drama’. Women’s Studies 40 (2011): 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehnenn, Jill R. Michael Field’s Revisionary Poetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Ehnenn, Jill R. ‘From “We Other Victorians” to “Pussy Grabs Back”: Thinking Gender, Thinking Sex, and Feminist Methodological Futures in Victorian Studies Today’. Victorian Literature and Culture 47, no. 1 (2019): 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehnenn, Jill R. ‘“Thy Body Maketh a Solemn Song”: Desire and Disability in Michael Field’s “Catholic Poems”’, in Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, edited by Parker, Sarah and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, 188–209. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehnenn, Jill R. ‘“Our Brains Struck Fire Each from Each”: Disidentification, Difference, and Desire in the Collaborative Aesthetics of Michael Field’, in Economies of Desire at the Victorian Fin de Siècle: Libidinal Lives, edited by Ford, Jane and Keates, Kim Edwards, 180–203. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Ehnenn, Jill R. ‘“Drag(ging) at Memory’s Fetter”: Michael Field’s Personal Elegies, Victorian Mourning, and the Problem of Whym Chow’. Michaelian 1 (2009). www.thelatchkey.org/Field/MF1/ehnennarticle.htmGoogle Scholar
Ehnenn, Jill R. Women’s Literary Collaboration, Queerness, and Late-Victorian Culture. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Ehnenn, Jill R. ‘Looking Strategically: Feminist and Queer Aesthetics in Michael Field’s Sight and Song’, Victorian Poetry 43, no. 1 (2005): 109–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evangelista, Stefano. British Aestheticism and Ancient Greece: Hellenism, Reception, Gods in Exile. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Robert P. ‘“I Leave a Page Half-Writ”: Narrative Discoherence in Michael Field’s Underneath the Bough’, in Women’s Poetry Late Romantic to Late Victorian: Gender and Genre, 1830–1900, edited by Armstrong, Isobel and Blain, Virginia, 164–82. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999.Google Scholar
Fraser, Hilary. Women Writing Art History in the Nineteenth Century: Looking Like a Woman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Hilary. ‘A Visual Field: Michael Field and the Gaze’. Victorian Literature and Culture 34, no. 2 (2006): 553–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Hilary. ‘The Religious Poetry of Michael Field’, in Athena’s Shuttle: Myth Religion Ideology from Romanticism to Modernism, edited by Marucci, Franco and Sdegno, Emma, 127–42. Milan: Cisalpino, 2000.Google Scholar
Friedman, Dustin. Before Queer Theory: Victorian Aestheticism and the Self. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Rob, and Vadillo, Ana Parejo. ‘Animating Sight and Song: A Meditation on Identity, Fair Use, and Collaboration’. 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 21 (2015) DOI: http://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzaniga, Andrea. ‘Michael Field’s Shared Sublime and Post-Romantic Transcendence’. Texas Studies in Literature and Language 62, no. 3 (2020): 316–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gracia, Dominique. ‘“The one question is not what you mean but what you do”: Michael Field’s Ekphrastic Verse’. Victorian Poetry 57, no. 3 (2019): 345–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Emily. ‘Michael Field and the Detachable Lyric’. Victorian Studies 50, no. 2 (2008): 221–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Linda K. ‘The Poetess Prehistory of Michael Field: Troubling Poetess History’. Victorian Review 48, no. 2 (2022): 179–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Linda K. ‘Michael Field (Katharine Bradley and Edith Cooper) and Significant Form’, in The Oxford Handbook of Victorian Poetry, edited by Bevis, Matthew, 563–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Huseby, Amy Kahrmann. ‘Queer Social Counting and the Generational Transitions of Michael Field’. Women’s Writing 26, no. 2 (2019): 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, Kenneth R. ‘“Sight and Song”: A Study of the Interrelations between Painting and Poetry’. Victorian Poetry 15, no. 1 (1977): 9–20.Google Scholar
Kersh, Sarah E. ‘“Betwixt Us Two”: Whym Chow, Metonymy, and the Amatory Sonnet Tradition’, in Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, edited by Parker, Sarah and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, 256–76. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Laird, Holly. Women Coauthors. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Laird, Holly. ‘Contradictory Legacies: Michael Field and Feminist Restoration’. Victorian Poetry 33, no. 1 (1995): 111–27.Google Scholar
Leighton, Angela. Victorian Women Poets: Writing against the Heart. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.Google Scholar
Locard, Henri. ‘Works and Days: The Journals of “Michael Field”’. Journal of the Eighteen Nineties Society 10 (1979): 1–9.Google Scholar
London, Bette. Writing Double: Women’s Literary Partnerships. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lysack, Krista. ‘Aesthetic Consumption and the Cultural Production of Michael Field’s Sight and Song’. Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 45, no. 4 (2005): 935–60.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jan. ‘“Disillusioned Bards and Despised Bohemians”: Michael Field’s A Question of Memory at the Independent Theatre Society’. Theatre Notebook: A Journal of the History and Technique of the British Theatre 31, no. 2 (1975): 18–29.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Kristin. Queer Kinship after Wilde: Transnational Decadence and the Family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, Kristin. ‘Michael Field’s Eric Gill: Radical Kinship, Cosmopolitanism, and Queer Catholicism’, in Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, edited by Parker, Sarah and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, 230–55. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Kristin. ‘Michael Field and Queer Community at the Fin-de-Siècle’. Victorian Review 41, no. 1 (2015): 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malfait, Olivia. ‘“Against the World”: Michael Field, Female Marriage and the Aura of Amateurism’. English Studies 96, no. 2 (2015): 157–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Catherine. ‘Michael Field’s Fragrant Imagination’, in Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, edited by Parker, Sarah and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, 151–66. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Catherine. ‘Michael Field, Death, and the Effigy’. Word and Image 34, no. 1 (2018): 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Catherine. Scents and Sensibility: Perfume in Victorian Literary Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitton, Matthew. ‘Before Michael Field: Katharine Bradley as “Arran Leigh”’. Philological Quarterly 89 (2010): 311–35.Google Scholar
Mitton, Matthew. ‘“For That Moment Only”: Michael Field and the Prose Poem’. The Michaelian 1 (June 2009): no pagination www.thelatchkey.org/Field/MF1/miltonarticle.htmlGoogle Scholar
Moore, Thomas Sturge, and Sturge Moore, D. C., eds. Works and Days: From the Journal of Michael Field. London: John Murray, 1933.Google Scholar
Murphy, Patricia. Reconceiving Nature: Ecofeminism in Late Victorian Women’s Poetry. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Murray, Alex. Decadent Conservatism: Aesthetics, Politics, and the Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Alex. ‘“Blundering Brutuses”: Michael Field, Nonconformism, and the Politics of Social Purity’, Literature and Theology 36, no. 3 (2022): 229–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Alex. ‘Michael Field’s Philosophy Notebook’. Studies in Walter Pater and Aestheticism 7 (November 2022): 87–138.Google Scholar
Murray, Alex. ‘Michael Field’s Wordsworth’. Victorian Poetry 58, no. 4 (2020): 427–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Alex. ‘“Profane Travellers”: Michael Field, Cornwall and Modern Tourism’, in Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, edited by Parker, Sarah and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, 167–87. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Murray, Alex, and Parker, Sarah, eds. Michael Field, For That Moment Only and Other Prose Works. Cambridge: MHRA, 2022.Google Scholar
Olverson, Tracy. ‘Michael Field’s Dramatically Queer Family Dynamics’, in Queer Victorian Families: Curious Relations in Literature, edited by Dau, Duc and Preston, Shale, 57–76. New York: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Olverson, Tracy. Women Writers and the Dark Side of Late-Victorian Hellenism. London: Palgrave, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Sarah. Form and Modernity in Women’s Poetry, 1895–1922: A Line of Her Own. New York: Routledge, 2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Sarah. ‘Sister Arts: Michael Field and Mary Costelloe’, in Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, edited by Parker, Sarah and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, 146–79. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Sarah. ‘The Male Wound in Fin-de-Siècle Poetry’, in The Male Body in Medicine and Literature, edited by Mangham, Andrew and Lea, Daniel, 87–102. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Sarah. ‘Bittersweet: Michael Field’s Sapphic Palate’, in Decadence and the Senses, edited by Desmarais, Jane and Condé, Alice, 121–40. Cambridge: Modern Humanities Research Association, 2017.Google Scholar
Parker, Sarah. The Lesbian Muse and Poetic Identity, 1889–1930. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2013.Google Scholar
Parker, Sarah. ‘Fashioning Michael Field: Michael Field and Late-Victorian Dress Culture’. Journal of Victorian Culture 18, no. 3 (2013): 313–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Sarah, and Parejo Vadillo, Ana, eds. Michael Field: Decadent Moderns. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Prins, Yopie. ‘Greek Maenads, Victorian Spinsters’, in Victorian Sexual Dissidence, edited by Dellamora, Richard, 43–81. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Prins, Yopie. Victorian Sappho. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prins, Yopie. ‘A Metaphorical Field: Katherine Bradley and Edith Cooper’. Victorian Poetry 33, no. 1 (1995): 129–48.Google Scholar
Prins, Yopie. ‘Sappho Doubled: Michael Field’. Yale Journal of Criticism 8, no. 1 (1995): 165–86.Google Scholar
Richardson, LeeAnne M. The Forms of Michael Field. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roden, Frederick S. Same-Sex Desire in Victorian Religious Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saville, Julia F. ‘The Poetic Imaging of Michael Field’, in The Fin-de-Siècle Poem: English Literary Culture and the 1890s, edited by Bristow, Joseph, 178–206. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Stetz, Margaret D., ‘“As She Feels a God Within”: Michael Field and Inspiration’, in Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, edited by Parker, Sarah and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, 47–66. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Stetz, Margaret D., and Wilson, Cheryl A., eds. Michael Field and Their World. High Wycombe: Rivendale Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Mary. Michael Field. London: George G. Harrap & Co., 1922.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Mary. Studies of Contemporary Poets. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, 1920.Google Scholar
Tate, Carolyn. ‘Lesbian Incest as Queer Kinship: Michael Field and the Erotic Middle-Class Victorian Family’, Victorian Review 39, no. 2 (2013): 181–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thain, Marion. ‘Perspective: Digitizing the Diary–Experience in Queer Encoding (A Retrospective and a Prospective)’. Journal of Victorian Culture 21, no. 2 (2016): 226–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thain, Marion. Michael Field: Poetry, Aestheticism and the Fin de Siècle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thain, Marion. ‘“Damnable Aestheticism” and the Turn to Rome: John Gray, Michael Field, and a Poetics of Conversion’, in The Fin-de-Siècle Poem: English Literary Culture and the 1890s, edited by Bristow, Joseph, 311–36. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Thain, Marion. Michael Field and Poetic Identity, with a Biography. London: Eighteen Nineties Society, 2000.Google Scholar
Thain, Marion, and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, ‘Editing Michael Field: Taking Fin-de-Siècle Women’s Poetry to a Broader Audience’, in Writing Women of the Fin de Siècle: Authors of Change, edited by Adrienne, E. Gavin and Oulton, Carolyn de la L., 70–82. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar
Thain, Marion, and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, eds. Michael Field, The Poet: Published and Manuscript Materials. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Thomas, Kate. ‘Vegetable Love: Michael Field’s Queer Ecology’, in Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, edited by Parker, Sarah and Vadillo, Ana Parejo, 25–46. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Kate. ‘“What Time We Kiss’: Michael Field’s Queer Temporalities’, GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 13, no. 2–3 (2007): 327–51.Google Scholar
Thomas, Tara. ‘Queer Decadent Historiography: Michael Field, Victoria Cross, and Theodora’. Studies in Walter Pater and Aestheticism, no. 5 (2020): 57–80.Google Scholar
Treby, Ivor C., ed. Binary Star: Leaves from the Journal and Letters of Michael Field, 1846–1914. Bury St Edmunds: De Blackland Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Treby, Ivor C., ed. Uncertain Rain: Sundry Spells of Michael Field. Bury St Edmunds: De Blackland Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Treby, Ivor C., ed. Music and Silence: The Gamut of Michael Field. Bury St Edmunds: De Blackland Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Treby, Ivor C., ed. A Shorter Shirazad: 101 Poems of Michael Field. Bury St Edmunds: De Blackland Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Treby, Ivor C. The Michael Field Catalogue. Padstow, Cornwall: De Blackland Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. ‘Michael Field, Pre-Raphaelite: One Play and Two Fair Beginnings’. 19: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 34 (2023): no pagination https://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.10113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. ‘Sculpture, Poetics, Marble Books: Casting Michael Field’, in Michael Field: Decadent Moderns, edited by Vadillo, Ana Parejo and Parker, Sarah, 67–99. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. ‘“This hot-house of decadent chronicle”: Michael Field, Nietzsche and the Dance of Modern Poetic Drama’. Women: A Cultural Review 26, no. 3 (2016): 195–220.Google Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. ‘Living Art: Michael Field, Aestheticism and Dress’, in Crafting the Women Professional in the Long Nineteenth Century: Artistry and Industry in Britain, edited by Hadjiafxendi, Kyriaki and Zakreski, Patricia, 243–71. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. ‘Another Renaissance: The Decadent Poetic Drama of A. C. Swinburne and Michael Field’, in Decadent Poetics: Literature and Form at the British Fin de Siècle, edited by Hall, Jason David and Murray, Alex, 116–40. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. ‘Aestheticism and Decoration: At Home with Michael Field’. Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens 74 (2011): 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. ‘Outmoded Dramas: History and Modernity in Michael Field’s Aesthetic Plays’, in Michael Field and Their World, edited by Margaret, D. Stetz and Wilson, Cheryl A., 237–49. London: Rivendale Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. Women Poets and Urban Aestheticism: Passengers to Modernity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadillo, Ana Parejo. ‘Sight and Song: Transparent Translations and a Manifesto for the Observer’. Victorian Poetry 38, no. 1 (2000): 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanita, Ruth. Sappho and the Virgin Mary: Same-Sex Love and the English Literary Imagination. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Vicinus, Martha. ‘Faun Love: Michael Field and Bernard Berenson’. Women’s History Review 18, no. 5 (2009): 753–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicinus, Martha. ‘Sister Souls: Bernard Berenson and Michael Field’. Nineteenth-Century Literature 60, no. 3 (2005): 326–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicinus, Martha. Intimate Friends: Women Who Loved Women, 1778–1928. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Vicinus, Martha. ‘Adolescent Boy: Fin de Siècle Femme Fatale?’ Journal of the History of Sexuality 5, no. 1 (1994): 90–114.Google Scholar
Witcher, Heather Bozant. Collaborative Writing in the Long Nineteenth Century: Sympathetic Partnership and Artistic Creation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcher, Heather Bozant. ‘A Royal Lady [Re]born: Balladry, Transport, and Transgression in Michael Field’s The Tragic Mary’. Victorian Poetry 55, no 4 (2017): 495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Chris. ‘Flesh and Roses: Michael Field’s Metaphors of Pleasure and Desire’. Women’s Writing 3, no. 1 (1996): 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Chris. ‘The Tiresian Poet: Michael Field’, in Victorian Women Poets: A Critical Reader, edited by Leighton, Angela, 148–61. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar
White, Chris. ‘“Poets and Lovers Evermore”: Interpreting Female Love in the Poetry and Journals of Michael Field’. Textual Practice 4, no. 2 (1990): 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Kelsey. ‘“Copied without Loss”: Michael Field’s Poetic Influence on the Work of W. B. Yeats’. Journal of Modern Literature 40, no. 1 (2016): 128–46.Google Scholar
Wilson, Cheryl A. ‘Bodily Sensations in the Conversion Poetry of Michael Field’. Victorian Review 54, no. 2 (2016): 179–97.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

The PDF of this book conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×