Origen. Commentaire sure l’Évangile selon Matthieu, Tome I (Livres X et XI). Edited and translated by Girod, Robert. SC 162. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1970.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentaire sur Saint Jean, Tome I (Livres I-V). Edited and translated by Blanc, Cécile. SC 120 bis. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1996.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentaire sur Saint Jean, Tome II (Livres VI et X). Edited and translated by Blanc, Cécile. SC 157. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1970.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentaire sur Saint Jean, Tome III (Livre XIII). Edited and translated by Blanc, Cécile. SC 222. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2006.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentaire sur Saint Jean, Tome IV (Livres XIX et XX). Edited and translated by Blanc, Cécile. SC 290. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1982.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentaire sur Saint Jean, Tome V (Livres XXVIII et XXXII). Edited and translated by Blanc, Cécile. SC 385. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1992.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentarius in Matthaeum I. Edited by Klostermann, Erich and Benz, Ernst. Origenes Werke 10. GCS 40. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1935.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentarius in Matthaeum II. Edited by Klostermann, Erich and Benz, Ernst. Origenes Werke 11. GCS 38. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1933.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentarius in Matthaeum III, 1. Edited by Klostermann, Erich and Benz, Ernst. Origenes Werke 12. GCS 41.1. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1941.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentarius in Matthaeum III, 2. Edited by Klostermann, Erich, Früchtel, Ludwig, and Treu, Ursula. 2nd ed. GCS 41.2. Berlin: AkademieVerlag, 1968.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentary on the Gospel According to John, Books 1–10. Translated by Ronald E. Heine. FC 80. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentary on the Gospel According to John, Books 13–32. Translated by Ronald E. Heine. FC 89. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentary on the Gospel according to St. Matthew. Translated by Ronald E. Heine. Oxford Early Christian Texts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2018.Google Scholar

Origen. “Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew.” In The Gospel of Peter, The Diatessaron of Tatian, The Apocalypse of Peter, the Vision of Paul, The Apocalypses of the Virgin and Sedrach, The Testament of Abraham, The Acts of Xanthippe and Polyxena, The Narrative of Zosimus, The Apology of Aristides, The Epistles of Clement (Complete Text), Origen’s Commentary on John, Books 1-10, and Commentary on Matthew, Books 1, 2, and 10–14. Edited by Menzies, Allan and translated by John Patrick. 4th ed. Ante-Nicene Fathers 9. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1994. Pp. 411–512.Google Scholar

Origen. Homélies sur S. Luc. Translated by Henri Crouzel, François Fournier, and Pierre Périchon. SC 87. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1962.Google Scholar

Origen. Homiliae in Lucam. Edited by Rauer, M.. 2nd ed. Origenes Werke 9. GCS 49. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1959.Google Scholar

Origen. Homilies on Luke. Translated by Joseph T. Lienhard. FC 94. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Origen. Der Kommentar zum Evangelium nach Mattäus. Translated by Hermann J. Vogt. Bibliothek der griechischen Literatur 18, 30, 38. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann, 1983, 1990, 1993.Google Scholar

Origen. New Fragments from the Commentary on Matthew, Codices Sabaiticus 232 & Holy Cross 104, Jerusalem. Edited by Tzamalikos, P.. Leiden: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2020.10.30965/9783657702800CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Origen. An Exhortation to Martyrdom, Prayer, First Principles: Book IV, Prologue to the Commentary on the Song of Songs, Homily XXVII on Numbers. Translated by Rowan A. Greer. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentarium in Canticum Canticorum. In Origenes Werke 8, edited by Baehrens, W. A., 61–241. GCS 33. Leipzig: Teubner, 1925.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, Books 1-5. Translated by Thomas P. Scheck. FC 103. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Origen. Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, Books 6-10. Translated by Thomas P. Scheck. FC 104. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Origen. Contra Celsum. Translated by Henry Chadwick. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Origen. Contre Celse, Tome I (Livres I et II). Edited and translated by Borret, Marcel. SC 132. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1967.Google Scholar

Origen. Contre Celse, Tome II (Livres III et IV). Edited and translated by Borret, Marcel. SC 136. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1968.Google Scholar

Origen. Contre Celse, Tome III (Livres V et VI). Edited and translated by Borret, Marcel. SC 147. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1969.Google Scholar

Origen. Contre Celse, Tome IV (Livres VII et VIII). Edited and translated by Borret, Marcel. SC 150. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1969.Google Scholar

Origen. Contre Celse, Tome V (Introduction générale, Tables et Index). Edited by Borret, Marcel. SC 227. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1976.Google Scholar

Origen. Die Neuen Psalmenhomilien: Eine Kritische Edition Des Codex Monacensis Graecus 314. In GCS 19. Edited by Perrone, Lorenzo. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar

Origen. De oratione. In GCS 3. Edited by Koetschau, Paul. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs, 1925. Pp. 297–403.Google Scholar

Origen. Entretien d’Origène avec Héraclide. Translated by Jean Scherer. SC 67. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1960.Google Scholar

Origen. Fragmenta ex Libro de Proverbiis Salomonis. In Patrologiae Cursus Completus (Series Graeca). Edited by Migne, J.-P., vol. 13, cols. 17–34. Paris: Migne, 1857.Google Scholar

Origen. Homélies sur Ézéchiel. Edited and translated by Borret, Marcel. SC 352. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1989.Google Scholar

Origen. Homélies sur Jérémie, Tome I (Homélies I-XI). Translated by Pierre Husson and Pierre Nautin. Edited by Nautin, Pierre. SC 232. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1976.Google Scholar

Origen. Homélies sur Jérémie, Tome II (Homélies XII-XX et Homélies latines). Translated by Pierre Husson and Pierre Nautin. Edited by Nautin, Pierre. SC 238. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1977.Google Scholar

Origen. Homélies sur Josué. Translated by Annie Jaubert. SC 71. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1960.Google Scholar

Origen. Homélies sur l’Exode. Translated by Marcel Borret. SC 321. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1985.Google Scholar

Origen. Homélies sur la Genèse. Translated by Louis Doutreleau. SC 7 bis. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1996.Google Scholar

Origen. Homélies sur le Lévitique, Tome I (Homélies I–VII). Translated by Marcel Borret. SC 286. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1981.Google Scholar

Origen. Homélies sur le Lévitique, Tome II (Homélies VIII–XVI). Translated by Marcel Borret. SC 287. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1981.Google Scholar

Origen. Homélies sur les Juges. Translated by Pierre Messié, Louis Neyrand, and Marcel Borret. SC 389. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1993.Google Scholar

Origen. Homiliae in Isaiam. In GCS 33. Edited by Baehrens, W. A.. Leipzig: Teubner, 1925. Pp. 242–289.Google Scholar

Origen. Homilies 1-14 on Ezekiel. Translated by Thomas P. Scheck. Ancient Christian Writers 62. New York, NY: The Newman Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Origen. Homilies on Genesis and Exodus. Translated by Ronald E. Heine. FC 71. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Origen. Homilies on Isaiah. Translated by Elizabeth A. Dively Lauro. FC 142. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press. 2021.Google Scholar

Origen. Homilies on Jeremiah; Homily on 1 Kings 28. Translated by John Clark Smith. FC 97. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Origen. Homilies on Joshua. Translated by Barbara J. Bruce. Edited by White, Cynthia. FC 105. Catholic University of America Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Origen. Homilies on Judges. Translated by Elizabeth A. Dively Lauro. FC 119. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Origen. Homilies on Leviticus. Translated by Gary Wayne Barkley. FC 83. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Origen. Homilies on the Psalms: Codex Monacensis Graecus 314. Translated by Joseph W. Trigg. FC 141. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Origen. On First Principles. Translated by G. W. Butterworth. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1973.Google Scholar

Origen. On First Principles. Edited and Translated by Behr, John. Oxford Early Christian Texts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2017.Google Scholar

Origen. Origenis Fragmenta in Ezechielem. Edited by Mai, Angelo. In Patrologiae Cursus Completus (Series Graeca). Edited by Migne, J.-P., vol. 17, col. 288. Paris: Migne, 1857.Google Scholar

Origen. Philocalie, 1–20: sur les écritures. Translated by Marguerite Harl. SC 302. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1983.Google Scholar

Origen. The Song of Songs: Commentary and Homilies. Translated by R. P. Lawson. Ancient Christian Writers 26. New York, NY: Newman Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Origen. St. Jerome: Commentary on Isaiah. Including St. Jerome’s Translation of Origen’s Homilies 1–9 on Isaiah. Translated by Thomas P. Scheck. Ancient Christian Writers 68. New York, NY: Newman Press. 2015.Google Scholar

Origen. Traité Des Principes, Tome I (Livres I et II): Introduction, Texte Critique de La Version de Rufin, Traduction. Edited and translated by Crouzel, Henri and Simonetti, Manlio. SC 252. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1978.Google Scholar

Origen. Traité Des Principes, Tome II (Livres I et II): Commentaire et Fragments. Edited and translated by Crouzel, Henri and Simonetti, Manlio. SC 253. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1978.Google Scholar

Origen. Traité Des Principes, Tome III (Livres III et IV): Introduction, Texte Critique de La Philocalie et de La Version de Rufin, Traduction. Edited and translated by Crouzel, Henri and Simonetti, Manlio. SC 268. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1980.Google Scholar

Origen. Traité Des Principes, Tome IV (Livres III et IV): Commentaire et Fragments. Edited and translated by Crouzel, Henri and Simonetti, Manlio. SC 269. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1980.Google Scholar

Origen. Traité Des Principes, Tome V: Compléments et Index. Edited and translated by Crouzel, Henri and Simonetti, Manlio. SC 312. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1984.Google Scholar

Origen. Treatise on the Passover and Dialogue of Origen with Heraclides and His Fellow Bishops on the Father, the Son, and the Soul. Translated by Robert J. Daly. Ancient Christian Writers 54. New York: Paulist Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Theon, Aelius. “Exercises.” In Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetortic. Translated with introductions and notes by George A. Kennedy. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2003. Pp. 1-72.Google Scholar

Alexander, Loveday. The Preface to Luke’s Gospel: Literary Convention and Social Context in Luke 1.1–4 and Acts 1.1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993.10.1017/CBO9780511554827CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Dale. Constructing Jesus: Memory, Imagination, and History. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2010.Google Scholar

Allison, Dale. “Darkness at Noon.” In Studies in Matthew. Edited by Dale Allison. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2005. Pp. 79–105.10.5040/9780567709370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Dale. Encountering Mystery: Religious Experience in a Secular Age. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2022.Google Scholar

Allison, Dale. The End of the Ages Has Come: An Early Interpretation of the Passion and Resurrection of Jesus. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Allison, Dale. “Jesus & the Victory of Apocalyptic.” In Jesus and the Restoration of Israel: A Critical Assessment of N. T. Wright’s Jesus and the Victory of God. Edited by Newman, Carey C.. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1999. Pp. 127–41.Google Scholar

Allison, Dale. Jesus of Nazareth: Millenarian Prophet. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Allison, Dale. The Historical Christ and the Theological Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar

Allison, Dale. The Resurrection of Jesus: Apologetics, Polemics, History. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2021.10.5040/9780567697608CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambrose of Milan. Commentary on the Gospel according to Saint Luke. Translated by Íde M. Ní Riain. Dublin: Halycon Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gary A. That I May Dwell Among Them: Incarnation and Atonement in the Tabernacle Narrative. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2023.Google Scholar

Anderson, Paul N., Felix Just, SJ, and Thatcher, Tom. John, Jesus, and History. vols. 1–3. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2007, 2009, 2016.Google Scholar

Silesius, Angelus. Cherubinischer Wandersmann oder Geistreiche Sinn- und Schlussreime. Edited by Aurbacher, Ludwig. Munich: Seidel, 1827.Google Scholar

Asirvatham, Sulochana R. “Historiography.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Edited by Richter, Daniel S. and Johnson, William A.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017. Pp. 477–91.Google Scholar

Auerbach, Erich. “Figura.” In idem, Scenes from the Drama of European Literature. Theory and History of Literature 9. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1984. Pp. 11–76.Google Scholar

Ayres, Lewis. “Irenaeus vs. the Valentinians: Toward a Rethinking of Patristic Exegetical Origins.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 23.2 (2015), 153–87.10.1353/earl.2015.0027CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baird, William. History of New Testament Research. Vol. 1: From Deism to Tübingen. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Baltzer, K. Deutero-Isaiah: A Commentary. Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006.Google Scholar

Becker, Eve-Marie. The Birth of Christian History: Memory and Time from Mark to Luke-Acts. Anchor Yale Bible Reference Library. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017.10.12987/yale/9780300165098.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behr, John. The Case Against Diodore and Theodore: Texts and their Contexts. Oxford Early Christian Texts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar

Behr, John. John the Theologian and His Paschal Gospel: A Prologue to Theology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2019.10.1093/oso/9780198837534.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beiser, F. C. David Friedrich Strauß, Father of Unbelief: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2020.10.1093/oso/9780198859857.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berchman, Robert M. “In the Shadow of Origen: Porphyry and the Patristic Origins of New Testament Criticism.” In Origeniana Sexta: Origène et la Bible/Origen and the Bible. Edited by Dorival, Gilles and le Boulluec, Alain. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1995. Pp. 657–73.Google Scholar

Bergjan, Silke-Petra. “Celsus the Epicurean? The Interpretation of an Argument in Origen, Contra Celsum.” Harvard Theological Review 94.2 (2001), 181–206.10.1017/S0017816001029030CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berglund, Carl Johan. “Interpreting Readers: The Role of Greco-Roman Education in Early Interpretation of New Testament Writings.” In Scriptural Interpretation at the Interface between Education and Religion: In Memory of Hans Conzelmann. Edited by Wilk, Florian. Leiden: Brill, 2018. Pp. 204–47.Google Scholar

Berglund, Carl Johan. Origen’s References to Heracleon: A Quotation-Analytical Study of the Earliest Known Commentary on the Gospel of John. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 450. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2020.10.1628/978-3-16-159222-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berglund, Carl Johan. “Origen’s Vacillating Stances toward his ‘Valentinian’ Colleague Heracleon.” Vigiliae Christianae 71 (2017), 541–69.10.1163/15700720-12341318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berglund, Carl Johan. “Understanding Origen: The Genre(s) of the Gospels in Light of Ancient Greek Philology and Modern Genre Theory.” Scrinium 12.1 (2016), 181–214.10.1163/18177565-00121p11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bermejo Rubio, Fernando. “The Fiction of the ‘Three Quests’: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Historiographical Paradigm.” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 7 (2009), 217–23.Google Scholar

Betz, Otto. “Die Vision des Paulus im Tempel von Jerusalem: Apg 22,17-21 als Beitrag zur Deutung des Damaskuserlebnisses.” In Verborum Veritas: Festschrift Gustav Sliihlin. Edited by Boecher, O. and Haacker, K.. Wuppertal: Brockhaus, 1970. Pp. 113–23.Google Scholar

Bietenhard, Hans. “The Millennial Hope in the Early Church.” Scottish Journal of Theology 6 (1953), 12–30.10.1017/S0036930600005317CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaski, Andrew. “Jews, Christians, and the Conditions of Christological Interpretation in Origen’s Work.” In Origeniana Duodecima: “Origen’s Legacy in the Holy Land – A Tale of Three Cities: Jerusalem, Caesarea and Bethlehem.” Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 302. Edited by Bitton-Ashkelony, B., Irshai, O., Kofsky, A., and Newman, H.. Leuven: Peeters, 2019. Pp. 505–18.Google Scholar

Blaski, Andrew. “The Philocalia of Origen: A Crude or Creative Composition?” Vigiliae Christianae 73.2 (2019), 174–89.10.1163/15700720-12341384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloch, René. “Philo’s Struggle with Jewish Myth.” In Philo of Alexandria and Greek Myth: Narratives, Allegories, and Arguments. Edited by Alessa, F. and De Luca, L.. Leiden: Brill, 2019. Pp. 107–26.Google Scholar

Bockmuehl, Markus. “Being Emmanuel: Matthew’s Ever-Present Jesus?” New Testament Studies 68.1 (2022), 1–12.10.1017/S0028688521000254CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bockmuehl, Markus. “The Making of Gospel Commentaries.” In The Written Gospel. Edited by Bockmuehl, Markus and Hagner, Donald A.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Pp. 274–95.10.1017/CBO9780511614729CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bockmuehl, Markus. Seeing the Word: Refocusing New Testament Study. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006.Google Scholar

Boobyer, G. H. St. Mark and the Transfiguration Story. New York, NY: T&T Clark, 1942.Google Scholar

Borg, Marcus. “David Friedrich Strauss: Miracle and Myth.” The Fourth R 4.3 (1991).Google Scholar

Borg, Marcus. Jesus, A New Vision: Spirit, Culture, and the Life of Discipleship. San Francisco, CA: HarperCollins, 1987.Google Scholar

Bornkamm, Günther. “The Stilling of the Storm in Matthew.” In Tradition and Interpretation in Matthew. Edited by Bornkamm, G., Barth, G., and Held, H. J.. London, UK: SCM Press. 1963. Pp. 52–57.Google Scholar

Bovon, F. Luke 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:1-9:50. Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Bowker, J. W. “Prophetic Action and Sacramental Form,” Studia Evangelica 2.3 (1964), 129–37.Google Scholar

Boxall, Ian. Discovering Matthew: Content, Interpretation, Reception. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar

Boxall, Ian. “Origen’s Commentary on Matthew and the Reception of Matthew’s Gospel.” In The Gospel of Matthew: Studies on Its Composition, Theology, and Early Reception. Edited by Verheyden, Joseph, Schröter, Jens, and Sim, David C.. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2022. Pp. 321–40.Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. “Philo, Origen, and the Rabbis on Divine Speech and Interpretation.” In The World of Early Egyptian Christianity: Language, Literature, and Social Context, Essays in Honor of David W. Johnson. Edited by Goehring, James E. and Timbie, Janet A.. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. Intertextuality and the Reading of Midrash. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Bravo, Benedetto. “Critice in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries and the Rise of the Notion of Historical Criticism.” In History of Scholarship: A Selection of Papers from the Seminar on the History of Scholarship Held Annually at the Warburg Institute. Edited by Ligota, C. R. and Quantin, J.-L.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2006. Pp. 135–95.Google Scholar

Breuss, Josef. “Das ‘Leben Jesu’ von David Friedrich Strauss und die Hegelsche Philosophie.” Freiburger Zeitschrift fur Philosophie und Theologie 19 (1972), 389–409.Google Scholar

Brey, Steven P. “Origen’s Commentary on John: Seeing All of Creation as Gospel.” PhD Dissertation. University of Notre Dame, 2003.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. The Anchor Yale Bible Reference Library. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. The Death of the Messiah: From Gethsemane to the Grave; A Commentary on the Passion Narratives of the Four Gospels. 2 Vols. New York: Doubleday, 1994.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. “Jesus and Elisha.” Perspectives 12 (1971), 85–104.Google Scholar

Bulgakov, Sergius. Relics and Miracles: Two Theological Essays. Translated by Boris Jakim. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolph. The Gospel of John: A Commentary. Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolph. Jesus Christ and Mythology. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1958.Google Scholar

Bultmann, Rudolph. “New Testament and Mythology.” In Kerygma and Myth: A Theological Debate. Edited by Bartsch, Hans W.. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1961. Pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Burridge, Richard. What Are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Butler, Shane. The Matter of the Page: Essays in Search of Ancient and Medieval Authors. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Byrskog, Samuel. “From Memory to Memoirs: Tracing the Background of a Literary Genre.” In The Making of Christianity: Conflicts, Contacts, and Constructions: Essays in Honor of Bengt Holmberg. Edited by Zetterholm, M. and Byrskog, S.. Coniectanea Biblica New Testament Series 47. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2012. Pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Caird, G. B. Jesus and the Jewish Nation. The Ethel M. Wood Lecture delivered before the University of London on 9 March 1965. London: The Athlone Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Caird, G. B. New Testament Theology. Edited by Hurst, L. D.. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Calhoun, Robert M., Moessner, David P., and Nicklas, Tobias, eds. Modern and Ancient Literary Criticism of the Gospels: Continuing the Debate on Gospel Genre(s). Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 451. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2020.10.1628/978-3-16-159414-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carleton Paget, James N. “The Jew of Celsus and adversus Judaeos Literature.” Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum 21.2 (2017), 201–42.Google Scholar

Cavadini, John C. “The Church as the Sacrament of Creation: A Reading of Origen’s Commentary on the Song of Songs.” Communio 42.1 (2005), 89–118.Google Scholar

Cavadini, John C. “From Letter to Spirit: The Multiple Senses of Scripture.” In The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Interpretation. Edited by Blowers, Paul M. and Martens, Peter W.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2019. Pp. 126–48.Google Scholar

Childs, Brevard. The New Testament as Canon: An Introduction. London: SCM Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Cirafesi, Wally V. and Fewster, Gregory Peter. “Justin’s ἀπομνημονεύματα and Ancient Greco-Roman Memoirs.” Early Christianity 7 (2016), 186–212.10.1628/186870316X14610520696794CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, Timothy J. “Paul as Jesus: Luke’s Use of Recursion in Luke-Acts.” PhD Dissertation. University of Chester, 2021Google Scholar

Collingwood, Robin G. The Idea of History. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1946.Google Scholar

Collins, Adela Yarbro. “Historical Jesus: Then and Now.” Reflections: A Magazine of Theological and Ethical Inquiry from Yale Divinity School (Spring 2008), 9–13.Google Scholar

Collins, Adela Yarbro. Is Mark’s Gospel a Life of Jesus? Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1990.10.5840/pmlt1990212CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Adela Yarbro. Mark: A Commentary. Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Collins, Adela Yarbro. “Genre and the Gospels.” The Journal of Religion 75.2 (1995), 239–46.Google Scholar

Collins, J. N. “Re-thinking ‘Eyewitnesses’ in the Light of ‘Servants of the Word’ (Luke 1:2).” The Expository Times 121.9 (2010), 447–52.10.1177/0014524610366500CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conzelmann, Hans. Die Mitte der Zeit: Studien zur Theologie des Lukas. Beitrage Zur Historischen Theologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1954. English translation: Geoffrey Buswell. The Theology of St. Luke. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Cranfield, C. E. B. “The Baptism of our Lord – A Study of St. Mark I.9-11,” Scottish Journal of Theology 8.1 (1955), 53–63.10.1017/S0036930600013739CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, Matthew R. “Ammonius of Alexandria, Eusebius of Caesarea and the Origins of Gospels Scholarship.” New Testament Studies 61 (2015), 1–29.10.1017/S0028688514000216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crouzel, Henri. Origen. Translated by A. S. Worrall. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1989.Google Scholar

Cullmann, Oscar. “Die Pluralität der Evangelien als theologisches Problem im Altertum.” Theologische Zeitschrift 1 (1945), 23–42. English translation: “The Plurality of the Gospels as a Theological Problem in Antiquity: A Study in the History of Dogma.” In idem, The Early Church: Studies in Early Christian History and Theology. Edited by A. J. B. Higgins. Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press, 1956. Pp. 37–54.Google Scholar

Daley, SJ, Brian, E. “Origen’s De principiis: A Guide to the ‘Principles’ of Christian Scriptural Interpretation.” In Nova Et Vetera: Patristic Studies in Honor of Thomas Patrick Halton. Edited by Petruccione, John. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1998. Pp. 3–21Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. Origen. Translated by Walter Mitchell. New York: Sheed and Ward, 1955.Google Scholar

Davies, J. H. “The Purpose of the Central Section of St. Luke’s Gospel.” Studia Evangelica 2 (1964), 164–69.Google Scholar

Davies, W. D. and Allison, Dale. Matthew 1-7: Volume 1. International Critical Commentary. New York, NY: T&T Clark, 1998.Google Scholar

Davies, W. D. and Allison, Dale. Matthew 19-28: Volume 3. International Critical Commentary. New York, NY: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar

Dawson, J. David. Christian Figural Reading and the Fashioning of Identity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Dawson, J. David. “Plato’s Soul and the Body of the Text in Philo and Origen.” In Interpretation and Allegory: Antiquity to the Modern Period. Edited by Whitman, J.. Boston/Leiden: Brill Academic, 2003. Pp. 89–10710.1163/9789004453593_006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeCock, Miriam. Interpreting the Gospel of John in Antioch and Alexandria. Writings from the Greco-Roman World Supplement Series 17. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press. 2020.10.2307/j.ctv1dc9k82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Faye, Eugène. Origène: sa vie, son œuvre, sa pensée. 3 vols. Paris: Éditions Ernest Leroux, 1923–1928. Translated by Fred Rothwell. Origen and His Work. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1926.Google Scholar

De la Potterie, Ignace. “La parabole du prétendant à la royauté (Lc 19,11–28).” In À cause de l’évangile: Études sur les Synoptiques et les Actes offertes au P. Jacques Dupont, O.S.B. à l’occasion de son 70e anniversaire. Paris: Cerf, 1985. Pp. 613–41.Google Scholar

De Long, Kindalee Pfremmer. “Angels and Visions in Luke-Acts.” In The Jewish Apocalyptic Tradition and the Shaping of New Testament Thought. Edited by Reynolds, Benjamin E. and Stuckenbruck, Loren T.. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2017. Pp. 79–107.10.2307/j.ctt1kgqv21.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Lubac, Henri. History and Spirit: The Understanding of Scripture According to Origen. Translated by Anne Englund Nash. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Deis, F. Lentzen. Die Taufe Jesu nach den Synoptikern; literarkritische und gattungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen. Frankfurt am Main: J. Knecht, 1970.Google Scholar

Denniston, J. D. The Greek Particles. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Dimant, Devorah. “Not Exile in the Desert but Exile in Spirit: The Pesher of Isa 40:3 in the Rule of the Community and the History of the Scrolls.” In eadem, History, Ideology and Bible Interpretation in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Collected Studies. Forschungen zum Alten Testament 90. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014. Pp. 255–64.10.1628/978-3-16-152851-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diodore of Tarsus. Commentary on Psalms 1-51. Translated by Robert C. Hill. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Diodore of Tarsus. “Commentary on the Psalms, Prologue.” In Biblical Interpretation in the Early Church. Edited and translated by Froehlich, Karlfried. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1984. Pp. 82–86.Google Scholar

Dively Lauro, Elizabeth Ann. The Soul and Spirit of Scripture within Origen’s Exegesis. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2005.10.1163/9789047414971CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodd, C. H. The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1953.10.1017/CBO9780511520334CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodd, C. H. “Matthew and Paul.” The Expository Times 58.11 (1947), 293–98.10.1177/001452464705801107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodd, C. H. The Parables of the Kingdom. Glasgow: Collins Sons & Co, 1978.Google Scholar

Donahue, SJ, , J. R. and Harrington, D. J., , SJ. The Gospel of Mark. Sacra Pagina Series 2. Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. Christianity in the Making, Vol. 1: Jesus Remembered. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. G. Jesus and the Spirit: A Study of the Religious and Charismatic Experience of Jesus and the First Christians as Reflected in the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1975.Google Scholar

Ecklebarger, Kermit A. “Authorial Intention as a Guiding Principle in Origen’s Matthew Commentary.” PhD Dissertation. University of Chicago, 1987.Google Scholar

Evans, Craig. “Daniel in the New Testament: Visions of God’s Kingdom.” In The Book of Daniel: Composition and Reception, vol 2. Edited by Collins, J. and Flint, P.. Leiden: Brill, 2001. Pp. 490–527.10.1163/9789004276093_011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke I-IX: Introduction, Translation, and Notes. Anchor Bible 28. New Haven, CT: Doubleday, 1982.Google Scholar

Flender, Helmut. Heil und Geschichte in der Theologie des Lukas. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag, 1965. Translated by R. H. and I. Fuller. St Luke: Theologian of Redemptive History. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Fortunatianus of Aquileia. Commentarii in Evangelia. Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum 103. Edited by Dorfbauer, L. J.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017. Commentary on the Gospels. Translated with Introduction by H. A. G. Houghton. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.Google Scholar

Fredriksen, Paula. When Christians Were Jews: The First Generation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018.10.2307/j.ctv75d0p5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaber, Goran. “What Was Critical History? A Reading of Richard Simon’s Histoire critique du Vieux Testament.” History and Theory 57.2 (2018), 218–33.10.1111/hith.12058CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gathercole, Simon. The Gospel and the Gospels: Christian Proclamation and Early Jesus Books. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2022.Google Scholar

Glasson, T. Francis. “Theophany and Parousia.” New Testament Studies 34 (1988), 259–70.10.1017/S0028688500020051CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gögler, Rolf. Zur Theologie des Biblischen Wortes bei Origenes. Düsseldorf: Patmos, 1963.Google Scholar

Gould, Warwick and Reeves, Marjorie. Joachim of Fiore and the Myth of the Eternal Evangel in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Revised Edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Gräßer, E. Das Problem der Parusieverzögerung in den synoptischen Evangelien und in der Apostelgeschichte Berlin-New York: De Gruyter, 1977.Google Scholar

Grant, Robert M. The Earliest Lives of Jesus. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 1961.Google Scholar

Grant, Robert M. Heresy and Criticism: The Search for Authenticity in Early Christian Literature. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Grube, D.-M. “The Lessing/Schumann Controversy. Lessing’s Stance on Contingency Compared to Kant’s Stance.” In Religions Challenged by Contingency: Theological and Philosophical Approaches to the Problem of Contingency. Edited by Grube, D.-M. and Jonkers, P.. Leiden: Brill, 2008. Pp. 89–118.10.1163/ej.9789004167490.i-248.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halperin, David J. “Origen, Ezekiel’s Merkabah, and the Ascension of Moses.” Church History 50.3 (1981), 261–75.10.2307/3167317CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, C. S. and Willitts, J., eds. Writing the Gospels: A Dialogue with Francis Watson. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2019.10.5040/9780567679154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, R. P. C. Allegory and Event: A Study of the Sources and Significance of Origen’s Interpretation of Scripture. Richmond, VA: John Knox Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Hanson, R. P. C. “The Passage Marked Unde? in Robinson’s Philocalia XV, 19,84–86.” In Origeniana Secunda: second colloque international des etudes origéniennes. Edited by Crouzel, Henri and Quacquarelli, Antonio. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, 1980. Pp. 293–304.Google Scholar

Harrill, J. Albert. “‘Exegetical Torture’ in Early Christian Biblical Interpretation: The Case of Origen of Alexandria.” Biblical Interpretation 25 (2017), 39–57.10.1163/15685152-00251p05CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, Horton. David Friedrich Strauss and His Theology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Harris, Ruth. Lourdes: Body and Spirit in the Secular Age. New York, NY: Penguin, 1999.Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B. Echoes of Scripture in the Gospels. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Hays, Richard B. Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Heath, Jane. “The Beginnings of a Christian Doctrine of the Spiritual Senses before Origen.” In The Intellectual World of Late Antique Christianity: Reshaping Classical Traditions. Edited by Ayres, Lewis, Champion, Michael W. and Crawford, Matthew R.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2023. Pp. 21–46.10.1017/9781108883559.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, Ronald E. “Epinoiai.” In The Westminster Handbook to Origen. Edited by McGuckin, John A.. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004. Pp. 93–95.Google Scholar

Heine, Ronald E. “The Introduction to Origen’s Commentary on John Compared with the Introductions to the Ancient Philosophical Commentaries on Aristotle.” In Origeniana Sexta: Origène et la Bible/Origen and the Bible. Edited by Dorival, Gilles and le Boulluec, Alain. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1995. Pp. 3–12.Google Scholar

Heine, Ronald E. “Origen’s Gospel Commentaries.” In The Oxford Handbook of Origen. Edited by Heine, R. E. and Torjesen, Karen J.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. 211–28.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199684038.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, Ronald E. “The Prologues of Origen’s Pauline Commentaries and the Schemata Isagogica of Ancient Commentary Literature.” In Studia Patristica 36. Edited by Wiles, M. F. and Yarnold, E. J.. Leuven: Peeters, 2001. Pp. 421–39.Google Scholar

Helms, Randel. Gospel Fictions. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1988.Google Scholar

Heraclitus, . Heraclitus: Homeric Problems. Edited and Translated by Donald A. Russell and David Konstan. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Hilary of Poitiers. Sur Matthieu I-II. Edited by Doignon, Jean. SC 254 and 258. Paris: Cerf, 1978. Translated by D. H. Williams, St. Hilary of Poitiers: Commentary on Matthew. FC 125. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Hollander, John. The Figure of Echo: A Mode of Allusion in Milton and After. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.10.1525/9780520377691CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hooker, Morna D. The Signs of a Prophet: The Prophetic Actions of Jesus. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 1997.Google Scholar

Houghton, H. A. G. The Latin New Testament: A Guide to its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2016.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198744733.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Houghton, H. A. G. and Parker, D. C., eds. Codex Zacynthius: Catena, Palimpsest, Lectionary. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Houghton, H. A. G., Manafis, Panagiotis, and Myshrall, A. C., eds. The Palimpsest Catena of Codex Zacynthius: Text and Translation. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Hunter, Richard. “Homer in Origen, Against Celsus.” In Celsus in his World: Philosophy, Polemic and Religion in the Second Century. Edited by Paget, James Carleton and Gathercole, Simon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. 215–48.Google Scholar

Hutt, Curtis. “‘Be Ye Approved Money Changers!’ Reexamining the Social Contexts of the Saying and Its Interpretation.” Journal of Biblical Literature 131.3 (2012), 589–609.10.2307/23488256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ierodiakonou, Katerina. “The Notion of Enargeia in Hellenistic Philosophy.” In Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honor of Jonathan Barnes. Edited by Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011. Pp. 60–73.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696482.003.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inowlocki, Sabrina. “Did Josephus Ascribe the Fall of Jerusalem to the Murder of James, Brother of Jesus?” Revue des Études Juives 170.1 (2011), 21–49.Google Scholar

Justin Martyr, . Justin, Philosopher and Martyr: Apologies. Edited by Minns, D. and Parvis, P.. Oxford Early Christian Texts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Käsemann, E. “Die Anfänge christlicher Theologie.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 57 (1960), 162–85. English translation: “The Beginnings of Christian Theology.” In New Testament Questions of Today. Translated by W. J. Montague. London: SCM Press, 1969. Pp. 82–107.Google Scholar

Kazen, Thomas. “The Coming Son of Man Revisited.” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 5.2 (2007), 157–76.10.1177/1476869007079742CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kazen, Thomas. “Son of Man as Kingdom Imagery: Jesus Between Corporate Symbol and Individual Redeemer Figure.” In Jesus from Judaism to Christianity: Continuum Approaches to the Historical Jesus. Edited by Holmén, T.. London: T&T Clark, 2007. Pp. 87–108.Google Scholar

Keith, Chris. The Gospels as Manuscript: An Early History of the Jesus Tradition as Material Artifact. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2020.10.1093/oso/9780199384372.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keith, Chris. “Social Memory Theory and Gospels Research: The First Decade (Part One).” Early Christianity 6.3 (2015), 354–76.Google Scholar

Keith, Chris. “Social Memory Theory and Gospels Research: The First Decade (Part Two).” Early Christianity 6.4 (2015), 517–42.Google Scholar

Kelhoffer, J. “‘How Soon a Book’ Revisited: ΕUΑΓΓΕΛΙΟΝ as a Reference to ‘Gospel’ Materials in the First Half of the Second Century.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 95 (2004), 1–34.10.1515/zntw.2004.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keough, Shawn W. J. “The Eternal Gospel: Origen’s Eschatological Exegesis.” In The Reception and Interpretation of the Bible in Late Antiquity: Proceedings of the Montréal Colloquium in Honour of Charles Kannengiesser, 11–13 October 2006. Edited by DiTommaso, Lorenzo and Turescu, Lucian. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2008. Pp 193–226.10.1163/ej.9789004167155.i-608.44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, J. R. Daniel. “Conceptualising Fulfilment in Matthew.” Tyndale Bulletin 59.1 (2008), 77–98.10.53751/001c.29249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knohl, Israel. The Messiah Confrontation: Pharisees versus Sadducees and the Death of Jesus. Philadelphia, PA: The Jewish Publication Society, 2022.10.2307/j.ctv2vvsx9rCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolbet, Paul R. “Rethinking the Rationales for Origen’s Use of Allegory.” Studia Patristica 56 (2013), 41–49.Google Scholar

Köpf, Ulrich. “Ferdinand Christian Baur and David Friedrich Strauss.” In Ferdinand Christian Baur and the History of Early Christianity. Edited by Bauspiess, M., Landmesser, C., and Lincicum, D.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017. Pp. 3–44.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198798415.003.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozitza, Evangeline M. “Aesthetic Piety and the Infant Christ: Seeing and Hearing in Infancy Traditions from the New Testament to Origen.” DPhil Thesis. University of Oxford, 2020.Google Scholar

Lamberton, Robert. Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Lee, Dorothy. “The Gospel of John and the Five Senses.” Journal of Biblical Literature 129.1 (2010), 115–27.10.2307/27821008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. “Über den Beweis des Geistes und der Kraft.” In Philosophische und Theologische Schriften II, Gesammelte Werke Vol. 8. Edited by Rilla, P.. Berlin: Aufbau, 1968. Pp. 9–16.Google Scholar

Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Lessing: Philosophical and Theological Writings. Trans. H. B. Nesbit. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, R. H. Locality and Doctrine in the Gospels. New York, NY: Harper, 1938.Google Scholar

Litwa, M. David. How the Gospels Became History: Jesus and Mediterranean Myths. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Litwa, M. David. We Are Being Transformed: Deification in Paul’s Soteriology. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.10.1515/9783110283419CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lohmeyer, Ernst. “‘Mir ist gegeben alle Gewalt!’ Eine Exegese von Mt. 28, 16–20.” In In Memoriam Ernst Lohmeyer. Edited by Schmauch, W.. Stuttgart: Evangelischer Verlagswerk, 1951. Pp. 22–49.Google Scholar

Lonergan, SJ, Bernard, . “Cognitional Structure.” In Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan, Vol. 4: Collection. Edited by Crowe, Frederick E. and Doran, Robert M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988. Pp. 205–21.Google Scholar

Luijendijk, , AnneMarie, . “Reading the Gospel of Thomas in the Third Century: Three Oxyrhynchus Papyri and Origen’s Homilies.” In Reading New Testament Papyri in Context. Edited by Clivaz, Claire and Zumstein, Jean. Leuven: Peeters, 2011. Pp. 241–67.Google Scholar

Luz, Ulrich. Matthew 8–20. Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Luz, Ulrich. Matthew 21–28. Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Marcus, Joel. “Did Matthew Believe His Myths?” In An Early Reader of Mark and Q. Edited by Verheyden, Joseph and Van Belle, Gilbert. Leuven: Peeters, 2016. Pp. 217–49.Google Scholar

Martens, Peter W. “Origen Against History? Reconsidering the Critique of Allegory,” Modern Theology 28 (2012), 635–56.10.1111/j.1468-0025.2012.01776.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martens, Peter W. Origen and Scripture: The Contours of the Exegetical Life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199639557.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martens, Peter W. “Revisiting the Allegory/Typology Distinction: The Case of Origen.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 16 (2008), 283–317.10.1353/earl.0.0193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marxsen, Willi. Mark the Evangelist: Studies on the Redaction History of the Gospel. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1969.Google Scholar

McCown, C. C. The Search for the Real Jesus: A Century of Historical Study. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1940.Google Scholar

McGinn, Bernard. “Mystical Consciousness: A Modest Proposal.” Spiritus 8.1 (2008), 44–63.10.1353/scs.0.0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuckin, John Anthony. “Changing Forms of Jesus.” In Origeniana Quarta: Die Referate des 4. Internationalen Origeneskongresses (Innsbruck, 2–6 September 1985). Edited by Lies, Lothar. Innsbruck: Tyrolia, 1987. Pp. 215–22.Google Scholar

McGuckin, John Anthony. “Origen’s Eschatology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Origen. Edited by Heine, R. E. and Torjesen, Karen J.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. 410–26.Google Scholar

McGuckin, John Anthony. “Origen as Literary Critic in the Alexandrian Tradition.” In Origeniana Octava: Origen and the Alexandrian Tradition. Edited by Perrone, L.. Vol. 1. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 164. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2003. Pp. 121–35.Google Scholar

McGuckin, John Anthony. Origen of Alexandria: Master Theologian of the Early Church. Lanham, MD. Lexington Books, 2022.Google Scholar

McGuckin, John Anthony. “Structural Design and Apologetic Intent in Origen’s Commentary on John.” In Origeniana Sexta: Origène et la Bible / Origen and the Bible, Actes du Colloquium Origenianum Sextum Chantilly, 30 août - 3 septembre 1993. Edited by Dorival, G. and Le Boulluec, A.. Leuven: Peeters, 1995. Pp. 441–57.Google Scholar

McGuckin, John Anthony. The Transfiguration of Christ in Scripture and Tradition. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1986.Google Scholar

McGuckin, John Anthony. The Westminster Handbook to Origen. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004.Google Scholar

McInroy, Mark J. “Origen of Alexandria.” In The Spiritual Senses: Perceiving God in Western Christianity. Edited by Gavrilyuk, Paul L. and Coakley, Sarah. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Pp. 20–35.Google Scholar

McKnight, Scot. “Jesus and Prophetic Actions.” Bulletin for Biblical Research 10 (2000), 197–232.10.2307/26422217CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meier, John P. A Marginal Jew. Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Volume One: The Roots of the Problem and the Person. Anchor Bible Reference Library. New York, NY: Doubleday, 1991.Google Scholar

Meier, John P. A Marginal Jew. Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Volume Two: Mentor, Message and Miracles. Anchor Bible Reference Library. New York, NY: Doubleday, 1994.Google Scholar

Meier, John P. A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Volume Three: Companions and Competitors. Anchor Bible Reference Library. New York, NY: Doubleday, 2001.Google Scholar

Meier, John P. A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus, Vol. 5: Probing the Authenticity of the Parables. Anchor Yale Bible Reference Library. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Meier, John P. Matthew. New Testament Message 3. Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Meier, John P. “Salvation-History in Matthew: In Search of a Starting Point.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 37.2 (1975), 203–15.Google Scholar

Meier, John P. The Vision of Matthew: Christ, Church, and Morality in the First Gospel. New York, NY: Crossroad, 1979.Google Scholar

Merkel, Helmut. Die Pluralität der Evangelien als theologisches und exegetisches Problem in der Alten Kirche. Bern: Peter Lang, 1978.Google Scholar

Merkel, Helmut. Die Widersprüche zwischen den Evangelien: Ihre polemische und apologetische Behandlung in der Alten Kirche bis zu Augustin. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1971.Google Scholar

Meyer, Ben F. The Aims of Jesus. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2002.Google Scholar

Michalson, G. E. Jr. Lessing’s “Ugly Ditch”: A Study of Theology and History. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Margaret M. “Gospel Optics.” In Writing the Gospels: A Dialogue with Francis Watson. Edited by Hamilton, C. S. and Willitts, J.. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2019. 184–205Google Scholar

Mitchell, Margaret M. “Patristic Rhetoric on Allegory: Origen and Eustathius Put 1 Kingdoms 28 on Trial.” In The “Belly-Myther” of Endor: Interpretations of 1 Kingdoms 28 in the Early Church. Translated by Rowan A. Greer and Margaret M. Mitchell. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2007. Pp. lxxxv–cxxiii.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Margaret M. Paul, the Corinthians and the Birth of Christian Hermeneutics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Moessner, David P. “Luke as Tradent and Hermeneut: ‘As one who has a thoroughly informed familiarity with all the events from the top’ (παρηκολουθηκότι ἄνωθεν πᾶσιν ἀκριβῶς, Luke 1:3).” Novum Testamentum 58 (2016), 259–300.10.1163/15685365-12341530CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morlet, Sébastien. Symphonia: La concorde des textes et des doctrines dans la littérature grecque jusqu’à Origène. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2019.Google Scholar

Moyise, Stephen. “The Wilderness Quotation in Mark 1:2-3.” In Wilderness: Essays in Honour of Frances Young. Edited by Sugirtharajah, R. S.. London & New York: T&T Clark, 2005. Pp. 78–87.Google Scholar

Mulder, Frederik S. “Gospel Contradictions, Harmonizations, and Historical Truth: Francis Watson and Origen’s Comprehensive Paradigm Shift.” In Writing the Gospels: A Dialogue with Francis Watson. Edited by Hamilton, C. S. and Willitts, J.. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2019. Pp. 166–83.Google Scholar

Müller, Mogens. “Were the Gospel Authors Really ‘Simple Christians Without Literary Gift’ (Albert Schweitzer)?: Arguments for the Quest for the Sources Behind the Gospels.” In Gospel Interpretation and the Q-hypothesis. Edited by Müller, Mogens and Omerzu, Heike. New York, NY: T&T Clark, 2018. Pp. 79–96.Google Scholar

Neil, Bronwen. “Dream-visions, Prophecy and Contemplation in Origen’s Contra Celsum.” In Praying and Contemplating. Edited by Pachoumi, E. and Edwards, M.. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018. Pp. 123–37.Google Scholar

Neuschäfer, Bernhard. Origenes als Philologe. 2 vols. Basel: Friedrich Reinhardt, 1987.Google Scholar

Newman, John Henry. Sermons on the Subjects of the Day. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1902.Google Scholar

Niehoff, Maren R. “Homer between Celsus, Origen and the Jews of Late Antique Palaestina.” In Text and Intertext in Greek Epic and Drama: Essays in Honor of Margalit Finkelberg. Edited by Price, Jonathan J. and Zelnick-Abramovitz, Rachel. New York, NY: Routledge, 2021. Pp. 185–209.Google Scholar

Niehoff, Maren R. Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011.10.1017/CBO9780511732324CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Novenson, Matthew. The Grammar of Messianism: An Ancient Jewish Political Idiom and Its Users. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Novick, Tzvi. “Biblicized Narrative: On Tobit and Genesis 22.” Journal of Biblical Literature 126.4 (2007), 755–64.10.2307/27638466CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nünlist, René. The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.10.1017/CBO9780511575891CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Outler, Albert C. “Origen and the Regulae Fidei.” Church History 8.3 (1939), 212–21.10.2307/3159928CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennington, Jonathan T. Heaven and Earth in the Gospel of Matthew. Leiden: Brill, 2007.10.1163/ej.9789004162051.i-399CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perrin, Norman. What Is Redaction Criticism? Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Philo. On the Decalogue. On the Special Laws, Books 1-3. Translated by F. H. Colson. LCL 320. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1937.Google Scholar

Philo On the Cherubim. The Sacrifices of Abel and Cain. The Worse Attacks the Better. On the Posterity and Exile of Cain. On the Giants. Translated by F. H. Colson and G. H. Whitaker. LCL 227. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929.Google Scholar

Pierce, Madison, Byers, Andrew, and Gathercole, Simon, eds. Gospel Reading and Reception in Early Christian Literature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2022.10.1017/9781009083188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plümacher, E. “ΤΕΡΑΤΕΙΑ: Fiktion und Wunder in der hellenistisch-römischen Geschichtsschreibung und in der Apostelgeschichte.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 89 (1998), 66–90.10.1515/zntw.1998.89.1-2.66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plummer, A. An Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to St. Matthew. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1910.Google Scholar

Poirier, John C. “Seeing What Is There in Spite of Ourselves: George Tyrrell, John Dominic Crossan, and Robert Frost on Faces in Deep Wells.” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 4.2 (2006), 127–38.10.1177/1476869006064870CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria L. E. “John the Evangelist’s Work: An Overlooked Redaktionsgeschichtliche Theory from the Patristic Age.” In The Origins of John’s Gospel. Edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Ong, Hughson T.. Leiden: Brill, 2016. Pp. 30–52.10.1163/9789004303164_004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria L. E. “Origen and the Stoic Allegorical Tradition: Continuity and Innovation.” Invigilata Lucernis 28 (2006), 195–225.Google Scholar

Ramelli, Ilaria L. E. “Prophecy in Origen: Between Scripture and Philosophy.” Journal of Early Christian History 7.2 (2017), 17–39.10.1080/2222582X.2017.1380504CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramsey, A. M. The Glory of God and the Transfiguration of Christ. London: Longman, Green and Co., 1949.Google Scholar

Ramsey, A. M. “What Was the Ascension?” Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas Bulletin II (1951), 43–50.Google Scholar

Reed, Annette Yoshiko. “Εὐαγγέλιον: Orality, Textuality, and the Christian Truth in Irenaeus’ Adversus Haereses.” Vigliae Christianae 56 (2002), 11–46.10.1163/15700720252984819CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, Benjamin E. and Stuckenbruck, Loren T., eds. The Jewish Apocalyptic Tradition and the Shaping of New Testament Thought. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2017.10.2307/j.ctt1kgqv21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, John A. T. Jesus and His Coming. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Robinson, John A. T. “The Parable of the Sheep and the Goats.” New Testament Studies 2.4 (1956), 225–37.10.1017/S0028688500017288CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowland, Christopher. The Open Heaven: A Study of Apocalyptic in Judaism and Early Christianity. London: SPCK, 1982.Google Scholar

Rowland, Christopher. “Visionary Experience in Ancient Judaism and Christianity.” In Paradise Now: Essays on Early Jewish and Christian Mysticism. Edited by DeConick, April. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2006. Pp. 41-56.Google Scholar

Rowland, Christopher and Morray-Jones, Christopher R. A., eds. The Mystery of God: Early Jewish Mysticism and the New Testament. Leiden: Brill, 2009.10.1163/ej.9789004175327.i-688CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rufinus of Aquileia. “Apology against Jerome.” In Theodoret, Jerome, Gennadius, & Rufinus: Historical Writings, Etc. Edited by Schaff, P. and Wace, H. and translated by W. H. Fremantle. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers Series 2 Vol. 3. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1994. Pp. 434–82.Google Scholar

Runia, David T. Philo in Early Christian Literature: A Survey. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Russell, D. A. Criticism in Antiquity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Sanders, E. P. The Historical Figure of Jesus. New York, NY: Penguin Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Sanders, E. P. Jesus and Judaism. London: SCM Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Schumann, J. D. Über die Evidenz der Beweise für die Wahrheit der christlichen Religion. Hannover: Schmidt, 1778.Google Scholar

Schäublin, C. “Homerum ex Homero.” Museum Helveticum 34.4 (1977), 221–27.Google Scholar

Scheck, Thomas P., trans. St. Pamphilus: Apology for Origen, with the Letter of Rufinus on the Falsification of the Books of Origen. FC 120. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Schwáb, Zoltán. “The Value of a Curious Translation: Revisiting Proverbs 2:5.” Journal of Biblical Literature 133.4 (2014), 739–49.10.15699/jbibllite.133.4.739CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schweitzer, Albert. Von Reimarus zu Wrede: eine Geschichte der Leben-Jesu-Forschung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1906. English translation (of the 2nd ed., 1913): The Quest of the Historical Jesus. Edited by John Bowden. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Sextus Empiricus. Against Professors. Translated by R. G. Bury. LCL 382. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Simon, Richard. Histoire critique des principaux commentateurs du Nouveau Testament, depuis le commencement du Christianisme jusques à nôtre tems. Rotterdam, 1693.Google Scholar

Smyth, Herbert W. A Greek Grammar for Colleges. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Stanton, Graham. “The Two Parousias of Christ: Justin Martyr and Matthew.” In Studies in Matthew and Early Christianity. Edited by Bockmuehl, Markus and Lincicum, David. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013. Pp. 339–49.10.1628/978-3-16-152544-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterling, Gregory E. “The Body as Metaphor: The Structure of a Human and the Meaning of Scripture.” Novum Testamentum 61 (2019), 26–39.10.1163/15685365-12341622CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strabo. Geography, Volume. I: Books 1-2. Translated by Horace L. Jones. LCL 49. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1917.Google Scholar

Strauss, David. F. Das Leben Jesu kritisch bearbeitet. Tübingen: C. F. Osiander, 1835. English translation: George Eliot. The Life of Jesus Critically Examined. London, UK: Chapman Bros, 1846. Edited with an introduction by Peter C. Hodgson. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Strauss, David. F. Streitschriften zur Vertheidigung meiner Schrift über das Leben Jesu und zur Charakteristik der gegenwärtigen Theologie. Drittes Heft: Die evangelische Kirchenzeitung, die Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Kritik, und die theologischen Studien und Kritiken in ihrer Stellung zu meiner Kritik des Lebens Jesu. Tübingen: C. F. Osiander, 1837. English translation (partial): Marylin C. Massey. In Defense of My “Life of Jesus” against the Hegelians. Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1983.Google Scholar

Studer, Basil. “Der Begriff der Geschichte im Schrifttum des Origenes von Alexandrien.” In Origeniana Octava: Origen and the Alexandrian Tradition. Edited by Perrone, L.. Vol. 1. Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 164. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2003. Pp. 757–77.Google Scholar

Strutwolf, Holger. “Kelsos und Origenes: Die Anfänge der Schriftkritik.” In Heilige Schriften in der Kritik. XVII. Europäischer Kongress für Theologie (5.–8. September 2021 in Zürich). Edited by Schmid, Konrad. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2022. Pp. 333–50.Google Scholar

Talbert, C. H, ed. Reimarus: Fragments. London, UK: SCM Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Thatcher, T. “Why John Wrote a Gospel: Memory and History in an Early Christian Community.” In Memory, Tradition, and Text: Uses of the Past in Early Christianity. Edited by Kirk, A. and Thatcher, T.. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2005. Pp. 79–97.Google Scholar

Theissen, Gerd and Merz, Annette. The Historical Jesus: A Comprehensive Guide. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Theodore of Mopsuestia. Commentary on the Gospel of John. Ancient Christian Texts. Translation with an introduction and notes by Marco Conti. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press Academic, 2010.Google Scholar

Theodore of Mopsuestia. The Commentaries on the Minor Epistles of Paul. Translated by Rowan A. Greer. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Theodore of Mopsuestia. “Traité contre les allégoristes.” In Théodore de Mopsueste. Fragments syriaques du Commentaire des Psaumes (Psaume 118 et Psaumes 138-148). Edited by Van Rompay, L.. Leuven: Peeters, 1982. Pp. 1–13. English translation: Frederick McLeod. Theodore of Mopsuestia. Early Church Fathers. New York, NY: Routledge, 2009. Pp. 75–79.Google Scholar

Therrien, Mark E. Cross and Creation: A Theological Introduction to Origen of Alexandria. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2022.10.2307/j.ctv2p5zwt3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torjesen, Karen Jo. Hermeneutical Procedure and Theological Method in Origen’s Exegesis. Patristic Texts and Studies 28. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1985.Google Scholar

Torjesen, Karen Jo. “‘Body,’ ‘Soul,’ and ‘Spirit,’ in Origen’s Theory of Exegesis.” Anglican Theological Review 67.1 (1985), 17–30.Google Scholar

Trapnell, William H. Thomas Woolston: Madman and Deist? Bristol, UK: Thoemmes Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Trzaskoma, Stephen M. “Mythography.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Edited by Richter, Daniel S. and Johnson, William A.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017. Pp. 463–75.Google Scholar

Turner, Denys. “Allegory in Christian Late Antiquity.” In The Cambridge Companion to Allegory. Edited by Copeland, Rita and Struck, Peter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. 71–82.10.1017/CCOL9780521862295.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyrrell, George. Christianity at the Crossroads. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1909.Google Scholar

Tzamalikos, Panayiotis. Origen: Philosophy of History and Eschatology. Boston: Brill, 2007.10.1163/ej.9789004156487.i-498CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van den Hoek, Annewies. “Clement and Origen as Sources on ‘Noncanonical’ Scriptural Traditions during the Late Second and Earlier Third Centuries.” In Origeniana Sexta: Origène et la Bible / Origen and the Bible, Actes du Colloquium Origenianum Sextum Chantilly, 30 août - 3 septembre 1993. Edited by Dorival, G. and Le Boulluec, A.. Leuven: Peeters, 1995. Pp. 93–113.Google Scholar

Van den Hoek, Annewies. “The Concept of σῶμα τῶν γραφῶν in Alexandrian Theology.” In Studia Patristica 19: Papers presented to the Tenth International Conference on Patristic Studies held in Oxford 1987. Historia, Theologica, Gnostica, Biblica et Apocrypha. Edited by Livingstone, E.A.. Leuven: Peeters, 1989. Pp. 250–54.Google Scholar

Van den Hoek, Annewies. “Philo and Origen: A Descriptive Catalogue of their Relationship.” Studia Philonica Annual 12 (2000), 44–121.Google Scholar

Velmans, Tania. “Observations sur l’emplacement et l’iconographie de l’entrée à Jérusalem dans quelques églises de Svanétie (Géorgie).” In Rayonnement grec: hommages à Charles Delvoye. Edited by Hadermann-Misguich, L., Raepsaet, G., and Cambier, G.. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 1982. Pp. 471–81.Google Scholar

Vines, Michael E. The Problem of Markan Genre: The Gospel of Mark and the Jewish Novel. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar

Vogt, Hermann Josef. Origenes als Exeget. Edited by Geerlings, Wilhelm. Munich: Ferdinand Schöningh, 1999.Google Scholar

Von Balthasar, Hans Urs, ed. Origen: Spirit and Fire: A Thematic Anthology of His Writings. Translated by Robert J. Daly. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Vos, J. S. “Das Agraphon ‘Seid Kundige Geldwechsler!’ bei Origenes.” In Sayings of Jesus: Canonical Canonical and Non-Canonical. Essays in Honour of Tjitze Baarda. Edited by Petersen, William L., Vos, Johan S., and de Jonge, Henk J.. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 89. Leiden: Brill, 1997. Pp. 277–302.10.1163/9789004267350_017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, Jeffrey. Rhetoric and Poetics in Antiquity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000.10.1093/oso/9780195130355.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walsh, Robyn F. The Origins of Early Christian Literature: Contextualizing the New Testament within Greco-Roman Literary Culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2021.10.1017/9781108883573CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, Francis. The Fourfold Gospel: A Theological Reading of the New Testament Portraits of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2016.Google Scholar

Watson, Francis. Gospel Writing: A Canonical Perspective. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013.Google Scholar

Watson, Francis. “Toward a Literal Reading of the Gospels.” In The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audiences. Edited by Bauckham, Richard. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998. Pp. 195–218.Google Scholar

Watson, Francis. What Is a Gospel? Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2022.Google Scholar

Weiss, Johannes. Die Predigt Jesu Gottes. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck, 1892. Translated, edited, and with an introduction by Richard Hyde Hiers and David Larrimore Holland. Jesus’ Proclamation of the Kingdom of God. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Wiles, Maurice F. “Origen as Biblical Scholar.” In The Cambridge History of the Bible, Vol. 1: From the Beginnings to Jerome. Edited by Ackroyd, P. R. and Evans, C. F.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Pp. 454–89.Google Scholar

Witherington, Ben III. The Christology of Jesus. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Witherington, Ben III. Jesus the Seer: The Progress of Prophecy. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2014.10.2307/j.ctt9m0w5xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woolston, Thomas. Defence of His Discourses, Parts I and II. London, 1729–1730.Google Scholar

Woolston, Thomas. Six Discourses on the Miracles of our Saviour. London, 1727–1729.Google Scholar

Wrede, William. Das Messiasgeheimnis in den Evangelien: zugleich ein Beitrag zum Verständnis des Markusevangeliums. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1901.Google Scholar

Wucherpfennig, Ansgar. Heracleon Philologus: Gnostische Johannesexegese im zweiten Jahrhundert. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 142. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.Google Scholar

Young, Frances M. Biblical Exegesis and the Formation of Christian Culture. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1997.10.1017/CBO9780511583216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Frances M. “John and the Synoptics: An Historical Problem or a Theological Opportunity?” In Ways of Reading Scripture: Collected Papers. Tübingen. Mohr Siebeck, 2018. Pp. 171–81.10.1628/978-3-16-154955-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmermann, Ruben. “Imagery in John: Opening Up Paths into the Tangled Thicket of John’s Figurative World.” In Imagery in the Gospel of John: Terms, Forms, Themes, and Theology of Johannine Figurative Language. Edited by Frey, J., Van der Watt, J. G., Zimmermann, R., and Kern, G.. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006. Pp. 1–43.Google Scholar