Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-vqtzn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-25T05:34:01.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2025

Edited by
Melissa Merritt
Melissa Merritt
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Kant and Stoic Ethics , pp. 239 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Primary Sources

Addison, Joseph (1987 [1712]). The Spectator, vol. 3, Bond, Donald F., ed. (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, Barnes, Jonathan, ed. (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund (1990 [1757]). A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, Phillips, Adam, ed. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Cicero, (1913). De officiis, Walter Miller, trans. (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Cicero, (2001). On Moral Ends, Raphael Woolf, trans. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, Margaret, trans., comm. (2002). Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4 (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Tobias, ed., trans., comm. (2003). Cicero’s Topica (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Epictetus (1925). Discourses, Fragments, the Encheiridion, W. A. Oldfather, trans. (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Epictetus (1998). Discourses Book 1, Robert Dobbin, trans. (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Epictetus (2002). Epictetus: The Complete Works, R. Waterfield, trans. (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Epictetus (2014). Discourses, Fragments, Handbook, Robin Hard, trans. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Garve, Christian (1783a). Philosophische Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Cicero’s Büchern von den Pflichten. Anmerkungen zu dem Ersten Buche (Korn).Google Scholar
Garve, Christian (1783b). Philosophische Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Cicero’s Büchern von den Pflichten. Anmerkungen zu dem Zweyten Buche (Korn).Google Scholar
Garve, Christian (1783c). Philosophische Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Cicero’s Büchern von den Pflichten. Anmerkungen zu dem Dritten Buche (Korn).Google Scholar
Garve, Christian (1792). Versuche über verschiedene Gegenstände aus der Moral, der Litteratur und dem gesellschaftlichen Leben (Korn).Google Scholar
Garve, Christian (1798a). Die Ethik des Aristoteles übersetzt und erläutert (Korn).Google Scholar
Garve, Christian (1798b). Eigene Betrachtungen über die allgemeinsten Grundsätze der Sittenlehre: Ein Anhang zu der Uebersicht der veschiednen Moralsysteme (Korn).Google Scholar
Hierocles (2009). Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts. Ramelli, Ilaria, ed., David Konstan, trans. (Society of Biblical Literature).Google Scholar
Lucian (1960). Charon ē episkopountes, in Lucian in Eight Volumes, vol. 2, Harmon, A. M., ed. (Harvard University Press), 395–477.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2002 [1785]). “Of Taste,” in Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, Brookes, Derek, ed. (Edinburgh University Press), 573–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2005 [1774]). “A Brief Account of Aristotle’s Logic,” in Thomas Reid on Logic, Rhetoric and the Fine Arts: Papers on the Culture of the Mind, Broadie, Alexander, ed. (Edinburgh University Press), 97–149.Google Scholar
Plato (1997). Complete Works, Cooper, John M., ed. (Hackett).Google Scholar
Plutarch (1931). Moralia, vol. 3, F. C. Babbitt, trans. (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Plutarch (1939). Moralia, vol. 6, W. C. Helmbold, trans. (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Savary, Claude-Étienne (1785–6). Lettres sur l’Égypte (Onfroi).Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich (1962 [1793]). “Über Anmut und Würde,” in Sämtliche Werke, vol. 5, Fricke, Gerhard and Göpfert, Herbert G., eds. (Hanser), 433–89.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1912 [1859]). Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung I, Berndl, Ludwig, ed. (Georg Müller).Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad (2007). Seneca: Selected Philosophical Letters: Translated with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford University Press; Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus (1917, 1920, 1925). Epistulae Morales, 3 vols., R. M. Gummere, trans. (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus (2010). Anger, Mercy, Revenge, R. A. Kaster and M. C. Nussbaum, trans. (University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus (2014). Hardship and Happiness, Fantham, Elaine, Hine, Harry M., Ker, James, and Williams, Gareth D., trans. (University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus (2015). Letters on Ethics, Margaret Graver and A. A. Long, trans. (University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sextus Empiricus (1997). Against the Ethicists, trans. and commentary Richard Bett (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Addison, Joseph (1987 [1712]). The Spectator, vol. 3, Bond, Donald F., ed. (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, Barnes, Jonathan, ed. (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund (1990 [1757]). A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, Phillips, Adam, ed. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Cicero, (1913). De officiis, Walter Miller, trans. (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Cicero, (2001). On Moral Ends, Raphael Woolf, trans. (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, Margaret, trans., comm. (2002). Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4 (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Tobias, ed., trans., comm. (2003). Cicero’s Topica (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Epictetus (1925). Discourses, Fragments, the Encheiridion, W. A. Oldfather, trans. (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Epictetus (1998). Discourses Book 1, Robert Dobbin, trans. (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Epictetus (2002). Epictetus: The Complete Works, R. Waterfield, trans. (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Epictetus (2014). Discourses, Fragments, Handbook, Robin Hard, trans. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Garve, Christian (1783a). Philosophische Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Cicero’s Büchern von den Pflichten. Anmerkungen zu dem Ersten Buche (Korn).Google Scholar
Garve, Christian (1783b). Philosophische Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Cicero’s Büchern von den Pflichten. Anmerkungen zu dem Zweyten Buche (Korn).Google Scholar
Garve, Christian (1783c). Philosophische Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Cicero’s Büchern von den Pflichten. Anmerkungen zu dem Dritten Buche (Korn).Google Scholar
Garve, Christian (1792). Versuche über verschiedene Gegenstände aus der Moral, der Litteratur und dem gesellschaftlichen Leben (Korn).Google Scholar
Garve, Christian (1798a). Die Ethik des Aristoteles übersetzt und erläutert (Korn).Google Scholar
Garve, Christian (1798b). Eigene Betrachtungen über die allgemeinsten Grundsätze der Sittenlehre: Ein Anhang zu der Uebersicht der veschiednen Moralsysteme (Korn).Google Scholar
Hierocles (2009). Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts. Ramelli, Ilaria, ed., David Konstan, trans. (Society of Biblical Literature).Google Scholar
Lucian (1960). Charon ē episkopountes, in Lucian in Eight Volumes, vol. 2, Harmon, A. M., ed. (Harvard University Press), 395–477.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2002 [1785]). “Of Taste,” in Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, Brookes, Derek, ed. (Edinburgh University Press), 573–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2005 [1774]). “A Brief Account of Aristotle’s Logic,” in Thomas Reid on Logic, Rhetoric and the Fine Arts: Papers on the Culture of the Mind, Broadie, Alexander, ed. (Edinburgh University Press), 97–149.Google Scholar
Plato (1997). Complete Works, Cooper, John M., ed. (Hackett).Google Scholar
Plutarch (1931). Moralia, vol. 3, F. C. Babbitt, trans. (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Plutarch (1939). Moralia, vol. 6, W. C. Helmbold, trans. (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Savary, Claude-Étienne (1785–6). Lettres sur l’Égypte (Onfroi).Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich (1962 [1793]). “Über Anmut und Würde,” in Sämtliche Werke, vol. 5, Fricke, Gerhard and Göpfert, Herbert G., eds. (Hanser), 433–89.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1912 [1859]). Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung I, Berndl, Ludwig, ed. (Georg Müller).Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad (2007). Seneca: Selected Philosophical Letters: Translated with Introduction and Commentary (Oxford University Press; Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus (1917, 1920, 1925). Epistulae Morales, 3 vols., R. M. Gummere, trans. (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus (2010). Anger, Mercy, Revenge, R. A. Kaster and M. C. Nussbaum, trans. (University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus (2014). Hardship and Happiness, Fantham, Elaine, Hine, Harry M., Ker, James, and Williams, Gareth D., trans. (University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus (2015). Letters on Ethics, Margaret Graver and A. A. Long, trans. (University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sextus Empiricus (1997). Against the Ethicists, trans. and commentary Richard Bett (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Albrecht, Michael (1978). Kants Antinomie der praktischen Vernunft (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag).Google Scholar
Allison, Henry (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2001). Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2011). Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Gold, Sharon (2001). Unnecessary Evil: History and Moral Progress in the Philosophy of Immanuel Kant (State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Annas, Julia (1992). Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind (University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia (1993). The Morality of Happiness (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Annas, Julia (1996). “Aristotle and Kant on Morality and Practical Reasoning,” in Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics, Whiting, Jennifer and Engstrom, Stephen, eds. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Annas, Julia (2008). “The Sage in Ancient Philosophy,” in Anthropine Sophia, Alesse, Francesca, ed. (Bibliopolis), 11–27.Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth (1990). “Seneca’s On the Happy Life and Stoic Individualism,” Apeiron 23(4), 219–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assaturian, Soseh (2022). “Why Children, Parrots, and Actors Cannot Speak: The Stoics on Genuine and Superficial Speech,” Apeiron 55(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badhwar, Neera K (1996). “The Limited Unity of Virtue,” Noûs 30, 306–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk, Durand, Marion, and Shogry, Simon (2023). “Stoicism,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2023 edition), E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman, eds. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/stoicism/.Google Scholar
Barney, Rachel (2003). “A Puzzle in Stoic Ethics,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24, 303–40.Google Scholar
Baron, Marcia (1995). Kantian Ethics Almost without Apology (Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret (2010). Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White (1963). A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Bernecker, Sven (2012). “Kant on Spatial Orientation,” European Journal of Philosophy 20, 519–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betzler, Monika, ed. (2008). Kant’s Ethics of Virtue (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birken-Bertsch, Hanno (2006). Subreption und Dialektik bei Kant: Der Begriff des Fehlers der Erschleichung in der Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts (Frommann-Holzboog).Google Scholar
Bittner, Rüdiger (2009). “Philosophy Helps History,” in Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim, Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg and Schmidt, James, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 231–49.Google Scholar
Blackwell Guide to Kant’s Ethics, Hill, Thomas, ed. (Blackwell).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, Maria (2004). “What Can Kant Teach Us about Emotions?,” Journal of Philosophy 101, 140–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, Maria (2019). Emotion, Reason, and Action in Kant (Bloomsbury Academic).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard (2007). Die Bestimmung des Menschen bei Kant (Meiner).Google Scholar
Brender, Natalie (2004). “What Is Disorientation in Thinking?,” in New Essays on the History of Autonomy. A Collection Honoring J. B. Schneewind, Brender, N. and Krasnoff, L., eds. (Cambridge University Press), 154–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Tad (1998). “Demoralising the Stoics.” Unpublished manuscript. Draft paper delivered at a meeting of the Boston Area Colloquium on Ancient Philosophy. www.academia.edu/22956010/Demoralizing_the_Stoics.Google Scholar
Brennan, Tad (2003). “Stoic Moral Psychology,” in Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Inwood, Brad, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 257–94.Google Scholar
Brennan, Tad (2005). The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Tad (2009). “Stoic Souls in Stoic Corpses,” in Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy, Frede, Dorathea and Reis, Burkhard, eds. (De Gruyter), 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, Robert (1929). Testament of Beauty (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles (2002). “Non-rational Perception in the Stoics and Augustine,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22, 253–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, René (2021). Law and Philosophy in the Late Roman Republic (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Čelkytė, Aistė (2020). The Stoic Theory of Beauty (Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
Chance, Brian, and Pasternack, Lawrence (2018). “Rational Faith and the Pantheism Controversy: Kant’s ‘Orientation’ Essay and the Evolution of His Moral Argument,” in Kant and His German Contemporaries, vol. 2: Aesthetics, History, Politics, and Religion, Dahlstrom, Daniel, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, Myisha (2021). The Case for Rage (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2007). “Belief in Kant,” Philosophical Review 116(3), 323–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, Jeffrey (2018). “The Veil of Philanthropy: Kant on the Political Benefits of Dissimulation and Simulation,” European Journal of Political Theory 20(1), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. (2009). The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix (2009). Kant and the Human Sciences: Biology, Anthropology and History (Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix, ed. (2014). Kant on Emotion and Value (Palgrave).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix (2018). “Rational Feelings,” in Kant and the Faculty of Feeling, Williamson, Diane and Sorensen, Kelly, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix (2020). “A Kantian Account of Emotions as Feelings,” Mind 129 (514), 429–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix (2021). “Feeling, Orientation and Agency in Kant: A Response to Merritt and Eran,” Kantian Review 26(3), 379–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John M. (1996). “Eudaimonism, the Appeal to Nature, and ‘Moral Duty’ in Stoicism,” in Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics, Engstrom, Stephen and Whiting, Jennifer, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 261–84.Google Scholar
Cooper, John M. (1998). “The Unity of Virtue,” Social Philosophy and Policy 15(1), 233–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John M. (1999). “Greek Philosophers on Euthanasia and Suicide,” in Reason and Emotion (Princeton University Press), 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John M. (2012). Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus (Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Roger (2003). “Socrates and Aristotle on Happiness and Virtue,” in Plato and Aristotle’s Ethics, Heinaman, Robert, ed. (Ashgate), 55–78.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul (1989). The Kantian Sublime: From Morality to Art (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan (2000). Practical Reality (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Denis, Lara (ed.) (2010). Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Denis, Lara (2013). “Virtue and Its Ends,” in Kant’s “Tugendlehre”: A Commentary, Trampota, Andreas, Sensen, Oliver, and Timmermann, Jens, eds. (De Gruyter), 159–82.Google Scholar
De Quincey, Thomas (1862). “The Last Days of Immanuel Kant and Other Writings,” in De Quincey’s Works, vol. 3 (Adam and Charles Black), 233–95.Google Scholar
DiCenso, James (2019). “Vocation and Destination in Kant’s Practical Philosophy,” Con-Textos Kantianos 1(10), 121–39.Google Scholar
Donini, Pierluigi (1999). “Stoic Ethics,” in Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M., eds. (Cambridge University Press), 705–38.Google Scholar
Doran, Robert (2015). The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Daniel, and Torralba, José M. (2016). “Kant and Stoic Ethics,” in The Routledge Handbook of the Stoic Tradition, Sellars, John, ed. (Routledge), 270–83.Google Scholar
du Plessis, Paul (2010). Borkowski’s Textbook on Roman Law, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dyck, Andrew (1996). A Commentary on Cicero, De officiis (University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey (forthcoming). “Kant’s Canon, Garve’s Cicero, and the Stoic Doctrine of the Highest Good,” in Kant’s Moral Philosophy in Context, Bacin, Stefano and Sensen, Oliver, eds. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Earman, John (1991). “Kant, Incongruous Counterparts, and the Nature of Space and Space-Time,” in The Philosophy of Right and Left, Van Cleve, James and Frederick, Robert E., eds. (Kluwer Academic), 131–49.Google Scholar
Eckermann, Johann Peter (2011 [1835]). Gespräche mit Goethe in den letzten Jahren seines Lebens, Michel, Christoph, ed. (Deutscher Klassiker-Verlag).Google Scholar
Elizondo, E. Sonny (2023). “Kantian Eudaimonism,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 9(4), 655–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (1996). “Happiness and the Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant,” in Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, Engstrom, Stephen and Whiting, Jennifer, eds. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 102–38.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (1997). “Kant’s Conception of Practical Wisdom,” Kant-Studien 88, 16–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (2002). “The Inner Freedom of Virtue,” in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Timmons, Mark, ed. (Oxford University Press), 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (2009). The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative (Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (2015). “Ancient Insights in Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good,” in Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide, Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 103–19.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen, and Whiting, Jennifer, eds. (1996). Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Flanagan, Owen (1991). Varieties of Moral Personality (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Flaubert, Gustave (2002 [1913]). Dictionnaire des idées reçues (Éditions du Boucher).Google Scholar
Frede, Michael (1994). “The Stoic Conception of Reason,” in Hellenistic Philosophy, vol. 2, Boudouris, K. J., ed. (International Center for Greek Philosophy and Culture), 50–63.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael (1999). “On the Stoic Conception of the Good,” in Topics in Stoic Philosophy, Ierodiakonou, Katerina, ed. (Oxford University Press), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, Michael (2011). A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought (University of California Press).Google Scholar
Frost, Bryan-Paul (1997). “An Interpretation of Plutarch’s Cato the Younger,” History of Political Thought 18(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Geiger, Ido (2011). “Rational Feelings and Moral Agency,” Kantian Review 16, 283–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gesang, Bernward (2007). Kants vergessener Rezensent (Felix Meiner).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görler, Woldemar (1978). “Das Problem der Ableitung der ethischen Normen bei Cicero,” Der altsprachliche Unterricht 21, 5–19.Google Scholar
Goy, Ina (2013). “Virtue and Sensibility (TL 6:399–409),” in Kant’s “Tugendlehre”: A Comprehensive Commentary, Trampota, Andreas, Sensen, Oliver, and Timmermann, Jens, eds. (De Gruyter), 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, Margaret (2007). Stoicism and Emotion (University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, Margaret (2014). “Ethics II: Action and Emotion,” in Brill’s Companion to Seneca: Philosopher and Dramatist, Damschen, Gregor and Heil, Andreas, eds. (Brill), 257–75.Google Scholar
Graver, Margaret (2016a) “Honor and the Honorable: Cato’s Discourse in De finibus 3,” in Cicero’s De finibus: Philosophical Approaches, Annas, Julia and Betegh, Gábor, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 118–46.Google Scholar
Graver, Margaret (2016b). “Anatomies of Joy: Seneca and the Gaudium Tradition,” in Hope, Joy, and Affection in the Classical World, Emotions of the Past, Caston, Ruth and Kaster, Robert, eds. (Oxford University Press), 123–42.Google Scholar
Graver, Margaret (2017). “Pre-emotions and Reader Emotions in Seneca: De ira and Epistulae morales.” Maia: Rivista di Letterature Classiche 69(2), 281–96.Google Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine (2022). Kant’s Deontological Eudaemonism: The Dutiful Pursuit of Virtue and Happiness (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groß, Felix, ed. (1912). Immanuel Kant: Sein Leben in Darstellungen von Zeitgenossen; die Biographien von L. E. Borowski, R. B. Jachmann und A. Ch. Wasianski (Deutsche Bibliothek).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1993). Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1997). Kant and the Claims of Taste (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1998). “Duties of Right and Duties of Virtue,” in Kant, Immanuel (1724–1804) in The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Taylor and Francis).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2000). Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2001). “From Nature to Morality: Kant’s New Argument in the ‘Critique of Teleological Judgment,’” in Architektonik und System in der Philosophie Kants, Fulda, Hans-Friedrich and Stolzenberg, Jürgen, eds. (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag), 375–404.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2010). “Moral Feeling in the Metaphysics of Morals,” in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, Denis, Lara, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 130–51.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2021). “The Teleologies of Leibniz and Kant: So Close yet so Far Apart,” in Leibniz and Kant, Look, Brandon C., ed. (Oxford University Press), 233–64.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2022). “The Empire of Ends,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 96, 204–37.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre (1995). Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, Davidson, Arnold I., ed. (Blackwell).Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre (1998). The Inner Citadel: The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius, M. Chase, trans. (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Hahmann, Andree (2021). “Christian Garve als Ausleger der stoischen Philosophie: Die Philosophischen Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Ciceros Büchern von den Pflichten,” in Christian Garve (1742–1798): Philosoph und Philologe der Aufklärung, Roth, Udo and Stiening, Gideon, eds. (De Gruyter), 127–42.Google Scholar
Hahmann, Andree, and Vazquez, Michael (2022). “Ciceronian officium and Kantian Duty,” Review of Metaphysics 75(4), 667–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Andy (2005). “Proprioception as Basic Knowledge of the Body,” in Basic Belief and Basic Knowledge: Papers in Epistemology, Woudenberg, R., Roeser, S., and Rood, R., eds. (De Gruyter), 269–92.Google Scholar
Harper, William (1991). “Kant on Incongruent Counterparts,” in The Philosophy of Right and Left, Van Cleve, James and Frederick, Robert E., eds. (Kluwer Academic), 263–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1954/5). “Das Prinzip der kantischen Ethik,” Philosophische Rundschau 2(1–2), 20–38.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara (1981). “On the Value of Acting from the Motive of Duty,” Philosophical Review 90, 359–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara (1993). The Practice of Moral Judgment (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Holberg, Erica A. (2018). “Kant’s Quasi‐Eudaimonism,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 56(3), 317–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Christoph (2008). “Kant und die Stoiker,” in Stoizismus in der europäischen Philosophie, Literatur, Kunst und Politik, Neymeyr, B., Schmidt, J., and Zimmermann, B., eds. (De Gruyter), 1081–103.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina (1993). “The Stoic Division of Philosophy,” Phronesis 38(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina (1999). Topics in Stoicism (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad (1985). Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad (1999a). “Rules and Reasoning in Stoic Ethics,” in Topics in Stoicism, Ierodiakonou, K., ed. (Oxford University Press), 95–127.Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad (1999b). “Stoic Ethics,” in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Algra, Keimpe et al., eds. (Cambridge University Press), 675–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Brad (2005). Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Brad (2022). “Self-Assessment and Rational Reflexivity in Epictetus,” Aitia 12, https://doi.org/10.4000/aitia.10423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Terence (1996). “Kant’s Criticism of Eudaimonism,” in Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, Engstrom, Stephen and Whiting, Jennifer, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 63–101.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence (2007–9). The Development of Ethics. 3 vols. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence (2010). “The Sense and Reference of Kalon in Aristotle,” Classical Philology 105(4), 381–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jachmann, Reinhold Bernhard (1804). Immanuel Kant Geschildert in Briefen an Einen Freund (F. Nicolovius).Google Scholar
Johnson, Andrew B. (2005). “Kant’s Empirical Hedonism,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86(1), 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Robert (2009). “Good Will and the Moral Worth of Acting from Duty,” in The Blackwell Guide to Kant’s Ethics, Hill, Thomas E., ed. (Wiley Blackwell), 17–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamtekar, Rachana (1998). “ΑΙΔΩΣ in Epictetus,” Classical Philology 93(2), 136–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamtekar, Rachana (2005). “Comments on John Cooper’s ‘The Emotional Life of the Wise,’” Southern Journal of Philosophy 43(Supplement), 219–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaser, Max, and Hackl, Karl (1996). Das römische Zivilprozessrecht (Beck).Google Scholar
Kaster, Robert A. (2010). “Translator’s Introduction,” in Seneca, Anger, Mercy and Revenge, Robert A. Kaster and Martha Nussbaum, trans. (University of Chicago Press), 3–13.Google Scholar
Kellner, Alan J. (2022). “Reading Conflict of the Faculties Politically: A More Creative Exposition of Kant’s Argument,” Review of Politics 84(2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, Ian (1955). “The Relation of Stoic Intermediates to the Summum Bonum, with Reference to Change in the Stoa,” Classical Quarterly 5, 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Jacob (2012). “Stoic Eudaimonism and the Natural Law Tradition,” in Reason, Religion and Natural Law: From Plato to Spinoza, Jacobs, Jonathan, ed. (Oxford University Press), 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Jacob (2015). “Making Sense of Stoic Indifferents,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49, 227–82.Google Scholar
Klein, Jacob (2016). “The Stoic Argument from Oikeiōsis,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 50, 143–200.Google Scholar
Klein, Jacob (forthcoming), “Original Sins: Chrysippus on Moral Mistakes and Middle Duties,” in Chrysippus and Stoicism, Crivelli, Paolo and Ierodiakonou, Katerina, eds. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (1995). Fortschritt und Vernunft: Zur Geschichtsphilosophie Kants (Kӧnigshausen and Neumann).Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (1998). “The Conative Character of Reason in Kant’s Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36(1), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (1999). “Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 16(1), 59–80.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2001). “Nature or Providence? On the Theoretical and Moral Importance of Kant’s Philosophy of History,” American Philosophical Quarterly 75(2), 201–19.Google Scholar
Kolomý, Vojtěch (2023). “Kant on Moral Feeling and Respect,” Kantian Review 28(1), 105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996). “From Duty and for the Sake of the Noble: Kant and Aristotle on Morally Good Action,” in Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, Engstrom, Stephen and Whiting, Jennifer, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 174–206.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (2008). “Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant,” in The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology (Oxford University Press), 100–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosman, Aryeh (2014). “Aristotle on the Virtues of Thought,” in Virtues of Thought: Essays on Plato and Aristotle (Harvard University Press), 280–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasnoff, Larry (1994). “The Fact of Politics: History and Teleology in Kant,” European Journal of Philosophy 2(1), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn (Kühn), Manfred (2001a). “Kant and Cicero,” in Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, Gerhard, V., Horstmann, R., and Schumacher, R., eds. (De Gruyter), 270–8.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred (2001b). Kant: A Biography (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred (2009). “Reason as a Species Characteristic,” in Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide, Rorty, Amelie O. and Schmidt, James, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 68–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landy, David (2011). “What Incongruent Counterparts Show,” European Journal of Philosophy 21(4), 507–24.Google Scholar
Le Doux, Joseph (1996). The Emotional Brain (Touchstone/Simon & Schuster).Google Scholar
Lindstedt, David (1999). “Kant: Progress in Universal History as a Postulate of Practical Reason,” Kant Studien 90, 129–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve (2009). “Providence as Progress: Kant’s Variations on a Tale of Origins,” in Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim, Rorty, Amélie O. and Schmidt, James, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 200–15.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1971). “Aisthēsis, Prolēpsis and Linguistic Theory in Epicurus,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 18, 114–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1993). “Hierocles on Oikeiōsis and Self-Perception,” in Hellenistic Philosophy, Boudouris, K., ed. (International Association for Greek Philosophy), 93–104.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2002). Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A.A. (2017). “Seneca and Epictetus on Body, Mind and Dualism,” in From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE–100 CE, Engberg-Pedersen, Troels, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 214–30.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre (1997). “The Uses of Anger,” Women’s Studies Quarterly 25(1–2), 278–85.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François (1991). Leçons sur l’analytique du sublime (Editions Galilée).Google Scholar
Macdonald, Helen (2020). Vesper Flights (Grove).Google Scholar
Magrin, Sara (2018). “Nature and Utopia in Epictetus’ Theory of Oikeiōsis,” Phronesis 63(3), 293–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf (1990). Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf (2003). “The Cognition-Knowledge Distinction in Kant and Dilthey and the Implications for Psychology and Self-Understanding,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34(1), 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, Jaap (1999). “Sources,” in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J.,and Schofield, M., eds. (Cambridge University Press), 3–30.Google Scholar
Martin, W. M. (2015). “Stoic Transcendentalism and the Doctrine of Oikeiosis,” in The Transcendental Turn, Gardner, S. and Grist, M., eds. (Oxford University Press), 342–68.Google Scholar
McDowell, John (1979). “Virtue and Reason,” The Monist 62, 331–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John (1998). “Some Issues in Aristotle’s Moral Psychology,” in Companions to Ancient Thought 4: Ethics, Everson, Stephen, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 107–28.Google Scholar
Menn, Stephen (1995). “Physics as a Virtue,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 11, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2018a). Kant on Reflection and Virtue (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2018b). The Sublime: Cambridge Elements (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2021a). “Nature, Corruption, and Freedom: Stoic Ethics in Kant’s Religion,” European Journal of Philosophy 29, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2021b). “Kant and Stoic Affections,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 51(5), 329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2021c). “Feeling and Orientation in Action: A Reply to Alix Cohen,” Kantian Review 26, 363–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2024a). “Mendelssohn and Kant on Human Progress: A Neo-Stoic Debate,” in Kant on Freedom and Human Nature, Filieri, Luigi and Møller, Sophie, eds. (Routledge).Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2024b). “Kant on Evil,” in Oxford Handbook of Kant, Stephenson, Andrew and Gomes, Anil, eds. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (forthcoming-a). “Kant and Psychological Monism: The Case of Inclination,” in The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Analytic Philosophy, Held, Jonas and Conant, James, eds. (Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (forthcoming-b). “The Ancient Background of Kant’s Conception of Virtue,” in The Aristotelian Kant, Gobsch, Wolfram and Land, Thomas, eds. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Miller, Jon, and Inwood, Brad, eds. (2003). Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milz, Bernhard (2002). Der gesuchte Widerstreit: Die Antinomie in Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsis, Phillip (2003). “The Stoics and Aquinas on Virtue and Natural Law,” Studia Philonica Annual 15, 35–53.Google Scholar
Neymeyr, Barbara, Schmidt, Jochen, and Zimmermann, Bernhard, eds. (2008). Stoizismus in der europäischen Philosophie, Literatur, Kunst und Politik (De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (1997). “Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism,” Journal of Political Philosophy 5(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (2009). The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics (Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (2015). “Transitional Anger,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (2016). Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, Justice (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Olberding, Amy (2005). “The ‘Stout Heart’: Seneca’s Strategy for Dispelling Grief,” Ancient Philosophy 25, 141–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papish, Laura (2018). Kant on Evil, Self-Deception, and Moral Reform (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence (2017). “Restoring Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55(3), 435–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulus, Christoph (1996–2003) “Formula,” in Der Neue Pauly, Enzyklopädie der Antike, Cancik, Hubert and Schneider, Helmuth, eds. (Metzler).Google Scholar
Pinheiro Walla, Alice (2022). Happiness in Kant’s Practical Philosophy: Morality, Indirect Duties, and Welfare Rights (Rowman and Littlefield).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollok, Anne, and Fugate, Courtney, eds. (2023). The Human Vocation in German Philosophy: Critical Essays and 18th-Century Sources (Bloomsbury).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prauss, Gerold (1983). Kant über Freiheit als Autonomie (Vittorio Klostermann). Press), 237–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1990). “Epilogue,” in Philosophical Papers, Mellor, D. H., ed. (Cambridge University Press), 245–50.Google Scholar
Rashdall, Hastings (1907). The Theory of Good and Evil (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1980). “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” Journal of Philosophy 77, 515–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews (1989). “Hedonism, Heteronomy and Kant’s Principle of Happiness,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70(1), 42–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Klaus (1935). Kant und die Ethik der Griechen (J. C. B. Mohr).Google Scholar
Reich, Klaus (1939). “Kant and Greek Ethics: II,” Mind 48(192), 446–63.Google Scholar
Reich, Klaus (2001). “Kant and Greek Ethics,” in Gesammelte Schriften, Baum, M., Rameil, U., Reisinger, K., and Scholz, G., eds. (Felix Meiner Verlag), 425–59.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Tobias, ed., trans., comm. (2003). Cicero’s Topica (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen J. (2005). The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Rossi, Philip J. (2019). The Ethical Commonwealth in History: Peace-Making as the Moral Vocation of Humanity (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santozki, Ulrike (2006). Die Bedeutung antiker Theorien für die Genese und Systematik von Kants Philosophie, Kant-Studien Ergänzungshefte 153 (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, Tamara (2009). “The Nature of Inclination,” Ethics 119, 229–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (1996). “Kant and Stoic Ethics,” in Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, Engstrom, Stephen and Whiting, Jennifer, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 285–302.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm (1999). The Stoic Idea of the City (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Scourfield, J. H. D. (2013). “Towards a Genre of Consolation,” in Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and Its Afterlife, Baltussen, Han, ed. (Classical Press of Wales), 1–36.Google Scholar
Seidler, Michael (1981). “The Role of Stoicism in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” PhD dissertation (St. Louis University).Google Scholar
Sellars, John, ed. (2016). The Routledge Handbook of the Stoic Tradition (Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2011). Kant on Human Dignity (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (1995a). “Kant on Sentimentalism and Stoic Apathy,” Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress 1(2), 705–11.Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (1995b). “Reason and Feeling in Kantian Morality,” discussion review of Paul Guyer, “Kant and the Experience of Freedom,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55(2), 369–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (1997). Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (2005). Stoic Warriors: The Ancient Philosophy behind the Military Mind (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (2011). “Aristotle, the Stoics, and Kant on Anger,” in Perfecting Virtue: New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics, Jost, Lawrence and Wuerth, Julian, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 215–40.Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (2021). Stoic Wisdom: Ancient Lessons for Modern Resilience (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1874). The Methods of Ethics (Macmillan).Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (2000). Emotion and Peace of Mind (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sticker, Martin (2021a). Rationalizing (Vernünfteln): Elements in the Philosophy of Immanuel Kant. (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sticker, Martin (2021b). “Kant, Moral Overdemandingness and Self‐Scrutiny,” Noûs 55(2), 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, Stephen, and Zupko, Jack, eds. (2004). Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, Gisela (1996). Essays in Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, Gisela (2022). “Two Kinds of Deliberation: Aristotle and the Stoics,” in From Aristotle to Cicero: Essays on Ancient Philosophy (Oxford University Press), 142–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuckenberg, J. H. W. (1882). Life of Immanuel Kant (Macmillan).Google Scholar
Táíwò, Olúfẹ́mi (2022). Reconsidering Reparations (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Jeremy (1952 [1651]). The Rule and Exercises of Holy Dying, Kepler, Thomas S., ed. (World Publishing).Google Scholar
Thomason, Krista (2017). “A Good Enough Heart: Kant and the Cultivation of Emotions,” Kantian Review 22(3), 441–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2022). Kant’s Will at the Crossroads: An Essay on the Failings of Practical Rationality (Oxford Universtiy Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmons, Mark (2017). Significance and System: Essays on Kant’s Ethics (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmons, Mark (2021). Kant’s Doctrine of Virtue (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Tinguely, Joseph J. (2013). “What Is Orientation Not in Thinking? Aesthetics, Epistemology, and the ‘Kantian Circle,’” in Kant und die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010, Ruffing, Margit, La Rocca, Claudio, Ferrarin, Alfredo, and Bacin, Stefano, eds. (De Gruyter), 273–86.Google Scholar
Tinguely, Joseph J. (2017). Kant and the Reorientation of Aesthetics: Finding the World (Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toner, Christopher (2014). “The Full Unity of the Virtues,” Journal of Ethics 18, 207–27.Google Scholar
Trampota, Andreas, Sensen, Oliver, and Timmermann, Jens, eds. (2013). Kant’s “Tugendlehre”: A Commentary (De Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouni, Georgia (forthcoming). “The Stoics on Appropriate Action,” in The Oxford Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy, Klein, Jacob and Powers, Nathan, eds. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Vasiliou, Iakovos (2008). Aiming at Virtue in Plato (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasiliou, Iakovos (2025). Varieties of Happiness: Eudaimonism and Greek Ethical Theory (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazquez, Michael (2021). “Hopeless Fools and Impossible Ideals,” Res Philosophica 98(3), 429–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visnjic, Jack (2021). The Invention of Duty: Stoicism as Deontology (Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory (1972). “The Unity of the Virtues in the ‘Protagoras,’” Review of Metaphysics 25(3), 415–58.Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory (1991). Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher (Cornell University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, Katja Maria (2008). Law, Reason and the Cosmic City (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, Katja (2014). “Taking the Same Things Seriously and Not Seriously: A Stoic Proposal on Value and the Good,” in Epictetus: His Continuing Influence and Contemporary Relevance, Gordan, Dane R. and Suits, David B., eds. (RIT Press), 55–75.Google Scholar
Vogt, Katja Maria (2021). “The Stoic Conception of Law,” Polis 38(3), 557–72.Google Scholar
Vogt, Katja Maria (forthcoming). “Virtue Is Knowledge: The Stoics on the Unity of the Virtues,” in Oxford Handbook of Stoicism, Bailey, Dominic, ed. (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
von der Pfordten, Dietmar (2009). “On the Dignity of Man in Kant,” Philosophy 84, 372–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walschots, Michael (2017). “Kant on Moral Satisfaction,” Kantian Review 22(2), 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walschots, Michael (2019). “Kant’s Conception of Selbstzufriedenheit,” in Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Waibel, Violetta L., Ruffing, Margit, and Wagner, David, eds. (De Gruyter), 2249–56.Google Scholar
Walschots, Michael (2021). “Garves Eudämonismus,” in Christian Garve (1742–1798), Roth, Udo and Stiening, Gideon, eds. (De Gruyter), 171–82.Google Scholar
Warda, Arthur (1922). Immanuel Kants Bücher (Martin Breslauer).Google Scholar
Watson, Gary (1984). “Virtues in Excess,” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 46, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Leopold (1909). “Formula,” in Pauly Realenzyklopädie der Altertumswissenschaft: Bd. 6, Wissowa, Georg, ed. (Druckenmüller), 2859–76.Google Scholar
White, Nicholas (2002). Individual and Conflict in Greek Ethics (Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wike, Victoria S. (1994). Kant on Happiness in Ethics (New York University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Wilson, Marcus (2013). “Seneca the Consoler? A New Reading of His Consolatory Writings,” in Greek and Roman consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and Its Afterlife, Baltussen, Han, ed. (Classical Press of Wales), 93–121.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan (2007). “Moral Psychology and the Unity of the Virtues,” Ratio 20, 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen (2000). “Kant vs. Eudaimonism,” in Kant’s Legacy: Essays Dedicated to Lewis White Beck, Cicovacki, Predrag, ed. (University of Rochester Press), 261–82.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2006). “The Supreme Principle of Morality,” in Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, Guyer, Paul, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 342–80.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2008). Kantian Ethics (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2015a). “Kant and Virtue Ethics,” in The Routledge Companion to Virtue Ethics, Besser-Jones, Lorraine and Slote, Michael, eds. (Routledge), 331–44.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2015b). “Kant’s History of Ethics,” in Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide, Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver, eds. (Cambridge University Press), 120–37.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2017). Formulas of the Moral Law (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (1992). “Rational Theology, Moral Faith, and Religion,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Guyer, Paul, ed. (Cambridge University Press), 394–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen (1960). Kant’s Moral Religion (Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Wynne, John. “Stoic Beauty” (unpublished journal article draft).Google Scholar
Zeller, Eduard (1873). Geschichte der deutschen Philosophie seit Leibniz (R. Oldenbourg).Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel (2007). Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment (Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel (2021). “Ambiguity and Loneliness in Kant’s Philosophy of History,” in Kant and the Possibility of Progress, Stoner, Samuel and Wilford, Paul, eds. (University of Pennsylvania Press), 62–76.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel (2023). “Kant’s Philosophy of History as Response to Existential Despair,” in Kant on Freedom and Human Nature, Filieri, Luigi and Mӧller, Sophie, eds. (Routledge), 173–189.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

The PDF of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Melissa Merritt, University of New South Wales, Sydney
  • Book: Kant and Stoic Ethics
  • Online publication: 18 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009321365.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Melissa Merritt, University of New South Wales, Sydney
  • Book: Kant and Stoic Ethics
  • Online publication: 18 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009321365.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Melissa Merritt, University of New South Wales, Sydney
  • Book: Kant and Stoic Ethics
  • Online publication: 18 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009321365.018
Available formats
×