Book contents
- Kant and Literary Studies
- Cambridge Studies in Literature and Philosophy
- Kant and Literary Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Kant on Literature
- Part II Kant, Literary Theory, and the Critical Formation of the “Human” Disciplines
- Part III Kant and Literature
- Index
- References
Part II - Kant, Literary Theory, and the Critical Formation of the “Human” Disciplines
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2025
Edited by
Book contents
- Kant and Literary Studies
- Cambridge Studies in Literature and Philosophy
- Kant and Literary Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Kant on Literature
- Part II Kant, Literary Theory, and the Critical Formation of the “Human” Disciplines
- Part III Kant and Literature
- Index
- References
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant and Literary Studies , pp. 95 - 186Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Bibliography
Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Conception of Freedom: A Developmental and Critical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakthin, Mikhail M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Holquist, Michael, transl. Caryl Emerson, Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Campe, Rüdiger. “Verfahren: Kleists allmähliche Verfertigung der Gedanken beim Reden.” Sprache und Literatur 110 (2011), 2–21.Google Scholar
Carr, David. Phenomenology and the Problem of History: A Study of Husserl’s Transcendental Philosophy. Evanston, Il: Northwestern University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. “Heinrich von Kleist und die Kantische Philosophie.” In Gesammelte Werke. Hamburger Ausgabe, ed. Recki, Birgit. Hamburg: Meiner 1998–2009, Vol. 9, 389–435.Google Scholar
Diogenes, Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. 2 vols. Trans. Robert Drew Hicks. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Erxleben, Johann Christian Polykarp. Anfangsgründe der Naturlehre. Göttingen and Gotha: Dieterich, 1772.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart. The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction. Trans. Brady Bowman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Greiner, Bernhard. Eine Art Wahnsinn – Dichtung im Horizont Kants: Studien zu Goethe und Kleist. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar
Greiner, Bernhard. Kleists Dramen und Erzählungen. Experimente zum “Fall” der Kunst. Stuttgart’: Francke, 2000.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Carol. Uncontainable Romanticism: Shelley, Brontë, Kleist. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1989.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and ed. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1998. (CPR)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Notes and Fragments. Ed. Guyer, Paul, trans. Curtis Bowman, Paul Guyer, and Frederick Rauscher. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleist, Heinrich von. Sämtliche Werke und Briefe. 4 Bde. Ed. Barth, Ilse-Marie, Salget, Klaus Müller, Ormanns, Stefan, and Seeba, Hinrich. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1987–1997. (SWuB)Google Scholar
Kleist, Heinrich von. Selected Writings. Ed. and trans. David Constantine. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 2004. (SW)Google Scholar
Lamanski, Jens. “Galilei, Torricelli, Stahl – Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte der Physik in der B-Vorrede zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft.” Kant-Studien 107 (2016), 451–484.Google Scholar
Lugowski, Clemens. Form, Individuality, and the Novel: An Analysis of Narrative Structure in Early German Prose. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Müller-Tamm, Jutta. “Kleists güne Gläser. Gefärbte Brillen, Blindheit und Erkenntnis um 1800.” In Blindheit in Ästhetik und Literatur (1750–1850), ed. Eickenrodt, Sabine. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2012.Google Scholar
Münzel, G. Felicitas. Kant’s Conception of Moral Character: The “Critical” Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Theisen, Bianca. Bogenschluss. Kleists Formalisierung des Lesens. Freiburg: Rombach, 1996.Google Scholar
Villers, Charles de. Philosophie de Kant, ou principes fondamentaux de la philosophie transcendentale. Metz: Collignon, 1801.Google Scholar
Wieland, Christoph Martin. “Sympathien.” In Gesammelte Schriften. Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften Hrsg Fritz Homeyer. Reprint. Hildesheim: Weidmann, 1986 [1909], Vol. 1, Part 2, 446–495.Google Scholar
Wünsch, D. Christian Ernst. Kosmologische Unterhaltungen für junge Freunde der Naturerkenntniß. 2 Bde. Leipzig: Breitkopf, 1791, 1794.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Brandom, Robert. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Specimens of the Table Talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Ed. Coleridge, Henry Nelson. London: John Murray, 1835, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Eldridge, Richard. “Acknowledging the Moral Law.” In Why Be Moral? ed. Louden, Robert B and Himmelmann, Beatrix. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar
Eldridge, Richard. Images of History: Kant, Benjamin, Freedom, and the Human Subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldridge, Richard. Literature, Life, and Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Eldridge, Richard. On Moral Personhood: Philosophy, Literature, Criticism, and Self-understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Eldridge, Richard. The Persistence of Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Geoffrey. Wordsworth’s Poetry: 1787–1814. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1864.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. “The French Revolution and Classical German Philosophy: Toward a Determination of Their Relation.” Trans. Wayne Martin, Sven Bernecker, and Hans Sluga. In Henrich, Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World: Studies in Kant. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Johnston, Kenneth R. The Hidden Wordsworth: Poet, Lover, Rebel, Spy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1998.Google Scholar
Johnston, Kenneth R. Wordsworth and The Recluse. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Ed. Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. and trans. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften. 22 Bde. Hrsg. Wilhelm Windelbrand. Berlin: Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1902.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.” In Kant, Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason.” Trans. George di Giovanni. In Kant, Religion and Rational Theology, ed. Wood, Allen W. and di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “What Is Enlightenment?” In Kant, Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Nancy, Jean-Luc. The Literary Absolute: The Theory of Literature in German Romanticism. Trans. Philip Barnard and Cheryl Lester. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. “Hegel on Faces and Skulls.” In Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. MacIntyre, Alasdair. New York: Doubleday, 1972.Google Scholar
Münzel, Felicitas. Kant on Moral Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Neiman, Susan. The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora. “Vindicating Reason.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Velkley, Richard. Freedom and the End of Reason: On the Moral Foundation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, William. Selected Poems and Prefaces. Ed. Stillinger, Jack. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1965.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Basterra, Gabriela. Seductions of Fate: Tragic Subjectivity, Ethics Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basterra, Gabriela. The Subject of Freedom: Kant, Levinas. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Basterra, Gabriela. “Unconditioned Subjectivity: Immanent Synthesis in Kant’s Third Antinomy.” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 29.3 (2015), 314–323.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. The Linguistic Condition: Kant’s Critique of Judgment and the Poetics of Action. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Copjec, Joan. “Sex and the Euthanasia of Reason.” In Supposing the Subject, ed. Copjec, Joan. London: Verso, 1994.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. London: The Athlone Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Goldman, Avery. Kant and the Subject of Critique: On the Regulative Role of the Psychological Idea. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. “Ethics of Autonomy.” In The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy, ed. Velkley, Richard. Trans. Jeffrey Edwards, Louis Hunt, Manfred Kuehn, and Guenter Zoeller. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften. 23 Bde. Hrsg. Königliche Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1902.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “The Jäsche Logic.” In Lectures on Logic, ed. Kant, Immanuel. Trans. J. Michael Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2002.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2009.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime. Trans. Elizabeth Rottenberg. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. The Experience of Freedom. Trans. Bridget McDonald. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. “Le Katègorein de l’excès.” In L’impératif catégorique. Paris: Flammarion, 1983.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. “The Kategorein of Excess.” In A Finite Thinking, ed. Sparks, Simon. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Boyarin, Daniel. Dying for God: Martyrdom and the Making of Christianity and Judaism. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. Judaism: The Genealogy of a Modern Notion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Brumlik, Micha. “Kants Theorie des Judentums.” In Deutscher Geist und Judenhass, Micha Brumlik. Munich: Luchterhand, 2000.Google Scholar
Campe, Rüdiger. “Vor-Augen-stellen: Über den Rahmen rhetorischer Bildgebung.” In Poststrukturalismus: Herausforderung an die Literaturwissenschaft, ed. Neumann, Gerhard. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1997. 2.Google Scholar
Feldman, Karen. Arts of Connection: Poetry, History, Epochality. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
Fulda, Daniel. Wissenschaft Aus Kunst: Die Entstehung der modernen deutschen Geschichtsschreibung 1760–1860. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1996.Google Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe. “Some Reflections on the Notion of Hypotyposis in Kant.” Argumentation 4.1 (February 1990), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. Guyer, Paul. Trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften. 23 Bde. Hrsg. Königliche Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1902.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “On the Idea of Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose.” In Political Writing, Immanuel Kant. Ed. Reiss, Hans, Trans. H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, in Religion and Rational Theology. Ed. and Trans. Wood, Allen W. and di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, George Y. “Against the Heteronomy of Halakhah: Hermann Cohen’s Implicit Rejection of Kant’s Critique of Judaism.” Dine Israel 32 (2018): 189–209.Google Scholar
Mack, Michael. German Idealism and the Jew: The Inner Anti-Semitism of Philosophy and German Jewish Responses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Rose, Paul L. Revolutionary Antisemitism in Germany from Kant to Wagner. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans. System der theoretischen, praktischen und religiösen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund eines idealistischen Positivismus, mit einem Anhang über Kant und Nietzsche. Berlin: Reuther, 1911.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.