Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T05:14:37.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - “Critique”

Concept, Project, Literary Form

from Part III - Kant and Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2025

Claudia Brodsky
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Kant introduced critique not just as a concept to describe his project that has become paradigmatic for the way we think about philosophy in modernity. With the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant also presents the first iteration of a literary genre whose impact proved seminal for the way successive philosophical practice conceives of presentation as constitutive for thought itself. This chapter first examines the affinity to Montaigne’s project of the essay that resonates with Kant’s own approach to rely on writing as medium for critical reflection. Montaigne’s traces in Kant are a reminder of the importance of the mode of the essay for the emergence of critique as a new literary mode. It then examines how Kant’s pre-critical essays advance themes that prove central to the literary mode of critique as a particular form of writing. The chapter shows how the Critique of Pure Reason articulates its project whose architectonics bears not just conceptual but also literary significance, representing itself part of an argument whose literary construction cannot simply be separated from its “content” or conceptual make-up. Rather, critique emerges in Kant as a specific mode of reasoning that reflects form as constitutive to content. It then discusses the way Kant highlights the function of critique as Enlightenment and how the Enlightenment publicist as its “depositary” represents the cause as a literary mandate. The chapter concludes with a brief outlook on formative impact of the literary legacy of Kant’s critique from Marx to Critical Theory and Derrida.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adorno, Theodor A. Negative Dialectics. Trans. E. B. Ashton. New York and London: Continuum, 1983.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. Trans. Henry W. Pickford. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Gesammelte Schriften, 7 Bde. Hrsg. Rolf Tiedemann and Hermann Schweppenhäuser in collaboration with Theodor W. Adorno and Gershom Scholem. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1972–1999.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Selected Writings. Ed. Jennings, Michael W., 4 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996–2006.Google Scholar
Brodsky, Claudia. The Linguistic Condition: Kant’s Critique of Judgment and the Poetics of Action. London: Bloomsbury, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, 9 Bde. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2004.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Of an Apocalyptic Tone Recently Adopted in Philosophy.” Semeia: An Experimental Journal for Biblical Criticism 23 (1982), 6397.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Mochlos – ou le conflit des facultés.” In Du droit à la philosophie, Jacques Derrida. Paris: Galilée, 1990.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Psyche: Inventions of the Other. Ed. Kamuf, Peggy and Rottenberg, Elizabeth. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Foucault Reader. Ed. Rabinow, Paul. New York: Pantheon, 1984.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Hugo. Montaigne, 3rd ed. Tübingen and Basel: Francke, 1993.Google Scholar
Goetschel, Willi. Constituting Critique: Kant’s Writing as Critical Praxis. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Goetschel, Willi. The Discipline of Philosophy and the Invention of Modern Jewish Thought. New York: Fordham University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetschel, Willi. “Kant and the Christo Effect: Grounding Aesthetics.” New German Critique 79 (2000), 137156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetschel, Willi. “Kritik und Frieden: Zur literarischen Strategie der Schrift Zum Ewigen Frieden.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress, ed. Robinson, Hoke. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg. “Metakritik über den Purismus der reinen Vernnuft.” In Hamann’s Schriften, ed. Roth, Friedrich, Hrsg. Leipzig: Reimer, 1825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Werke. 30 Bde. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1980.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. Identität und Objektivität: Eine Untersuchung über Kants transzendentale Deduktion. Heidelberg: Winter, 1976.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. “Die Beweisstruktur der transzendentalen Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe – eine Diskussion mit Dieter Henrich.” In Probleme der “Kritik der reinen Vernunft,” ed. Tuschling, Burkhard. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1984.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Eine Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Leipzig: Hartknoch, 1799.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. “Traditional and Critical Theory.” In Horkheimer, Critical Theory: Selected Essays, Max Horkheimer. Trans. Matthew J. O’Connell. New York: Continuum, 1982, pp. 188243.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?” In What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions, ed. Schmidt, James. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology, History, and Education. Ed. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B.. Trans. Holly Wilson. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Briefwechsel, 3rd ed. Ed. Schöndörffer, Otto and Maler, Rudolf. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1986.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and ed. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Rede und Gespräch. Ed. Malter, Rudolf. Hamburg: Meiner, 1990.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion and Rational Theology. Ed. Wood, Allen W. and Giovanni, George Di. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770. Trans. and ed. Walford, David in collaboration with Ralf Meerbote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Ed. Allison, Henry and Heath, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens or Essay on the Constitution and the Mechanical Origin of the Whole Universe According to Newtonian Principles.” Trans. Olaf Reinhardt. In Natural Sciences, Immanuel Kant. Ed. Watson, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Werkausgabe, 12 Bde. Hrsg. Wilhelm Weischedel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1977.Google Scholar
Liebmann, Otto. Kant und die Epigonen: Eine kritische Untersuchung. Stuttgart: Schober, 1985.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. The Reality of the Mass Media. Trans. Kathleen Cross. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd ed. Ed. Tucker, Robert C.. New York and London: Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. Werke, 44 Bde. Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus beim ZK der SED. Berlin: Dietz, 1956–1968.Google Scholar
Mbembe, Achille. Critique of Black Reason. Trans. Laurent Dubois. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. The Complete Works: Essays, Travel Journal, Letters. Trans. Donald M. Frame. New York: Knopf, 2003.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. “Essais.” In Œuvres complètes, Montaigne, Michel de. Ed. Thibaudet, Albert and Rat, Maurice. Paris: Gallimard, 1962.Google Scholar
Sloterdijk, Peter. Critique of Cynical Reason. Trans. Michael Eldred. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Weber, Sam. Benjamin’s Abilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×