Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-vmslq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-24T03:03:34.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2025

Rasmus Koss Hartmann
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Innovation Management
Foundations and Futures
, pp. 217 - 230
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aarts, A. A. et al. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 349(6251), 943950.Google Scholar
Abbott, A. 1981. Status and status strain in the professions. American Journal of Sociology. 86(4), 819835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abernathy, W. J. 1978. The productivity dilemma: Roadblock to innovation in the automobile industry (Chapter 4). John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Abrahamson, E. & Fairchild, G. 1999. Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers and collective learning processes. Administrative Science Quarterly. 44(4), 708740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. A. 2013. Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Crown Currency.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. A. 2005. Institutions as a fundamental cause of development. In Handbook of economic growth, ed. Aghion, P. & Durlauf, S.. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Adler, P. S. 2022. Capitalism, socialism and the climate crisis. Organization Theory. 3(1), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, P. S. & Borys, B. 1996. Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly. 41(1), 6189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, P. S. et al. 2009. Perspectives on the productivity dilemma. Journal of Operations Management. 27(2), 99113.Google Scholar
Adner, R. & Kapoor, R. 2016a. Innovation eco-systems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves. Strategic Management Journal. 37(4), 625648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adner, R. & Kapoor, R. 2016b. Right tech, wrong time. Harvard Business Review. November 2016, 2–9.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S. & Goldfarb, A. 2023. Do we want less automation? Science. 381, 155158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agrawal, A., Gans, J. S. & Stern, S. 2021. Enabling entrepreneurial choice. Management Science. 67(9), 55105524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, H. E. & Ruef, M. 2018. Unicorns, gazelles, and other distractions on the way to understanding real entrepreneurship in the United States. Academy of Management Perspectives. 32(4), 458472. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, H. E., Hodgson, G. M., Hull, D. L., Knudsen, T., Mokyr, J. & Vanberg, V. J. 2008. In defense of generalized Darwinism. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 18(5), 577596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R. C. 2009. Engels’ Pause: Technical change, capital accumulation and inequality in the British industrial revolution. Explorations in Economic History. 46(4), 418435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, E. J., Nagle, F. & Tushman, M. L. 2015. Innovating without information constraints: Organizations, communities, and innovation when information costs approach zero. In The Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship, ed. Shalley, C. E., Hitt, M. A. & Zhou, J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Altman, E. J., Nagle, F. & Tushman, M. L. 2021. The translucent hand of managed ecosystems: Engaging communities for value creation and capture. Academy of Management Annals. 16, 70101. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. 2007. Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review. 32(4), 12651281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. & Spicer, A. 2012. A stupidity-based theory of organizations. Journal of Management Studies. 49(7), 11941220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. 2017. Private government: How employers rule our lives (and why we don’t talk about it). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. & Tushman, M. L. 1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35(4), 604633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annosi, M. C., Foss, N. & Martini, A. 2020. When Agile harms learning and innovation (and what can be done about it). California Management Review. 63(1), 6180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, A. & Gambardella, A. 1994. The changing technology of technological change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labor. Research Policy. 23(5), 523532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augsdorfer, P. 2005. Bootlegging and path dependency. Research Policy. 34(1), 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, D. H. 2015. Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 29(3), 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S. & Manso, G. 2011. Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. The RAND Journal of Economics. 42, 527554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00140.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azoulay, P., Jones, B. F., Kim, J. D. & Miranda, J. 2020. Age and high-growth entrepreneurship. American Economic Review: Insights. 2(1), 6582.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. E. & Barley, S. R. 2011. Teaching-learning ecologies: Mapping the environment to structure through action. Organization Science. 22(1), 262285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, C. & von Hippel, E. 2011. Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science. 22(6), 13691683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, S. R. 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly. 31(1), 78108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basalla, G. 1988. The evolution of technology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Basbøll, T. 2010a. Softly constrained imagination: Plagiarism and misprision in the theory of organizational sensemaking. Culture and Organization. 16(2), 163178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basbøll, T. 2010b. Multiple failures of scholarship: Karl Weick and the Mann Gulch disaster. In The leading journal in the field: Destabilizing authority in the social sciences of management, ed. Armstong, P. & Lilley, S.. Mayfly Books.Google Scholar
Basbøll, T. & Graham, H. 2006. Substitutes for strategy research: Notes on the source of Karl Weick’s anecdote for the young lieutenant and the map. Ephemera. 6(2), 194205.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 1990. Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy. 98(5), 893921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beane, M. 2019. Shadow learning: Building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Administrative Science Quarterly. 64(1), 87123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, M. C., Knudsen, T. & Swedberg, R. 2003. The entrepreneur. Classic texts by Joseph A. Schumpeter. Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
Becker, M. C., Knudsen, T. & Swedberg, R. (eds.) 2011. The entrepreneur – classic texts by Joseph A. Schumpeter. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Beer, J. J. 1959. The emergence of the German dye industry. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Benkler, Y. 2017. Peer production, the commons, and the future of the firm. Strategic Organization. 15(2), 264274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, M. J. & Tushman, M. 2002. Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly. 47(4), 676707. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentzen, E., Christiansen, J. K. & Varnes, C. J. 2011. What attracts decision makers’ attention? Managerial allocation of time at product development portfolio meetings. Management Decision. 49(3), 330349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, E. 2012. The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Administrative Science Quarterly. 57(2), 181216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, E. 2017. Making transparency transparent: The evolution of observation in management theory. Academy of Management Annals. 11(1), 217266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, E., Bunch, J., Canner, N. & Lee, M. 2016. Beyond the Holacracy Hype. Harvard Business Review. July–August 2016.Google Scholar
Bessen, J. 2014. Learning by doing: The real connection between innovation, wages, and wealth (Ch. 5–6). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J. & Webb, M. 2020. Are ideas getting harder to find? American Economic Review. 110(4), 11041144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodrozic, Z. & Adler, P. S. 2018. The evolution of management models: A neo-Schumpeterian theory. Administrative Science Quarterly. 63(1), 85129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodrozic, Z. & Adler, P. S. 2022. Alternative futures for the digital transformation: A macro-level Schumpeterian perspective. Organization Science. 33(1), 105125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodrozic, Z., Hartmann, R. K. & Krabbe, A. D. 2024. The ascendance and decline of entrepreneurialism: A neo-Schumpeterian perspective. Paper presented at EGOS Colloquium 2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostrom, N. 2024. Deep utopia: Life and meaning in a solved world. Ideapress Publishing.Google Scholar
Branstetter, L., Lima, F., Taylor, L. J., & Venâncio, A. 2014. Do entry regulations deter entrepreneurship and job creation? Evidence from recent reforms in Portugal. The Economic Journal. 124(577), 805832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, T. F. & Trajtenberg, M. 1995. General purpose technologies: “Engines of growth”? Journal of Econometrics. 65(1), 8108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B. 1991. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 17(5), 475482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P. 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science. 2(1), 4057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsson, N. 1989. The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Wiley.Google Scholar
Brunsson, N. 1993. Ideas and action: Justification and hypocrisy as alternatives to control. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 18(6), 489506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E. & McAfee, A. 2014. The second machine age: Work, progress and prosperity in an age of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Brynjolffson, E., Hofmann, P. & Jordan, J. 2010. Cloud computing and electricity: Beyond the utility model. Communications of the ACM. 53(6), 3234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D. & Raymond, L. R. 2023. Generative AI at work. National Bureau of Economics Research (NBER) Working Paper 31161 (updated November 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, T. & Stalker, G. M. 1961. The management of innovation. Tavistock.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology. 110(2), 349399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camuffo, A., Gambardella, A., Messinese, D., Novelli, E., Paolucci, E. & Spina, C. 2024. A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision-making: A large-scale replication and extension. Strategic Management Journal. 45(6), 12091237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalini, C., Guzman, J. & Stern, S. 2019. Hidden in plain sight: Venture growth with or without venture capital. NBER Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. D. 1977. The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business (Introduction). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chavda, A., Gans, J. S. & Stern, S. 2024. Theory-Driven Entrepreneurial Search (January 25, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4706860 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4706860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, C. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail (Introduction). Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Christiansen, J. K. & Varnes, C. J. 2007. Making decisions on innovation: Meetings or networks? Creativity and Innovation Management. 16(3), 282298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, I. M., Henderson, R. & Stern, S. 2019. The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation: An exploratory analysis. In The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda, ed. Agrawal, A., Gans, J. & Goldfarb, A.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35(1), 128152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colaizzi, P. 1978. Psychological research as a phenomenologist views it. In Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology, ed. Valle, R. & King, S., Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. G. 1990. Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons. 33(3), 4454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criscuolo, P., Salter, A. & Ter Wal, A. L. J. 2014. Going underground: Bootlegging and individual innovative performance. Organization Science. 25(5), 12871571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusumano, M. A., Mylonadis, Y. & Rosenbloom, R. S. 1992. Strategic maneuvering and mass market dynamics: The triumph of VHS over Betamax. Business History Review. 66(1), 5194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, P. A. 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review. 75(2), 332337.Google Scholar
David, P. A. 1990. The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity dilemma. The American Economic Review. 80(2), 355361.Google Scholar
Davis, G. F. 2016. The vanishing American corporation: Navigating the hazards of a new economy. Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
De Cruz, H. & De Smedt, J. 2010. Science as structured imagination. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 44, 3752. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01324.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, J. P. J. 2016. The empirical scope of user innovation. In Revolutionizing innovation: Users, communities, and open innovation, ed. Harhoff, D. & Lakhani, K. R.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dell’Acqua, F. 2022. Falling asleep at the wheel: Human/AI collaboration in a field experiment on HR recruiters. Unpublished Working Paper.Google Scholar
Dell’Acqua, F., Kogut, B. & Perkowski, P. 2023a. Super Mario Meets AI: Experimental effects of automation and skills on team performance and coordination. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell’Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F. & Lakhani, K. R. 2023b. Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality (September 15, 2023). Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper No. 24-013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4573321 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4573321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delong, J. B. 2022. Slouching towards utopia: An economic history of the twentieth century. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dennis, M. A. 1987. Accounting for research: New histories of corporate laboratories and the social history of American science. Social Studies of Science. 17(3), 479518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy. 11(3), 147162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowell, G. & Swaminathan, A. 2006. Entry timing, exploitation and firm survival in the early U.S. bicycle industry. Strategic Management Journal. 27(12), 11591182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duggan, W. 2013. Strategic intuition: The creative spark in human achievement. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Duhigg, C. 2018. The case against Google. The New York Times Magazine. February 20, 2018.Google Scholar
Duncan, R. B. 1976. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. In The management of organization design: Strategies and implementation, ed. Kilmann, R. H., Pondy, L. R., & Slevin, D. P.. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dunne, J. 1993. Back to the rough ground: Practical judgment and the lure of technique. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Elias, N. 1982a. The civilizing process: The history of manners. Pantheon.Google Scholar
Elias, N. 1982b. The civilizing process: Power and civility. Pantheon.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, J. & Gross, D. P. 2020. Answering the call of automation: How the labor market adjusted to the mechanization of telephone operation. NBER Working Paper 28061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. 2016. When strategy walks out the door. MIT Sloan Management Review. August 31, 2016.Google Scholar
Felin, T. 2018. The fallacy of obviousness. Aeon. July 2018.Google Scholar
Felin, T. & Kauffman, S. 2023. Disruptive evolution: Harnessing functional excess, experimentation and science as tool. Industrial and Corporate Change. 32(6), 13721392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. & Zenger, T. R. 2017. The theory-based view: Economic actors as theorists. Strategy Science. 2(4), 258271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiol, C. M. 1996. Squeezing harder doesn’t always work: Continuing the search for consistency in innovation research. Academy of Management Review. 21(4), 10121021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, N. J. 2003. Selective intervention and internal hybrids: Interpreting and learning from the rise and decline of the Oticon Spaghetti Organization. Organization Science. 14(3), 331349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, R. 1986. Innovation: The attacker’s advantage. Summit Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, D. 2018. Walls: A history of civilization in blood and brick. Scribner An Imprint of Simon and Schuster, Inc.Google Scholar
Galenson, D. W. 2009. Old masters and young geniuses: The two life cycles of human creativity. Journal of Applied Economics. XII(1), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, J. S. 2017. The disruption dilemma. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gans, J. S., Hsu, D. H. & Stern, S. 2002. When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction. The RAND Journal of Economics. 33(4), 571586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, J. S., Scott, E. L. & Stern, S. 2018. Do entrepreneurs need a strategy? Harvard Business Review. May–June 2018.Google Scholar
Gans, J. S., Scott, E. L. & Stern, S. 2020. Entrepreneurial strategy. Available for download from www.entrepreneurial-strategy.net.Google Scholar
Gans, J. S., Stern, S. & Wu, J. 2019. Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management Journal. 40(5), 736756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, J. S., Kearney, M., Scott, E. L. & Stern, S. 2020. Choosing Technology: An entrepreneurial strategy approach. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper #27489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehman, J. & Soublière, J. F. 2017. Cultural entrepreneurship: From making culture to cultural making. Innovation. 19(1), 6173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1268521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A. & Basbøll, T. 2014. When do stories work? Evidence and illustration in the social sciences. Sociological Methods and Research. 43(4), 547570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Giersch, H. 1984. The age of Schumpeter. The American Economic Review. 74(2), 103109. www.jstor.org/stable/1816338. Accessed January 13, 2025.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. J. 2016. The rise and fall of American growth: The U.S. standard of living since the civil war. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Social networks. American Journal of Sociology. 78(6), 13601380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M. & Suri, S. 2019. Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Greene, F. J., Mole, K. & Storey, D. J. 2004. Does more mean worse?: Three decades of enterprise policy in the Tees Valley. Urban Studies. 41, 12071228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, L. E. 1998. Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review. May/June, 55–68.Google Scholar
Gustetic, J. L., Crusan, J., Rader, S. & Ortega, S. 2015. Outcome-driven open innovation at NASA. Space Policy. 34, 1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2015.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, D. 1957. The entrepreneur as cultural hero. The Southwestern Social Science Quarterly. 38(3), 248256.Google Scholar
Hannigan, T., McCarthy, I. P. & Spicer, A. 2023. Beware of Botshit: How to manage the epistemic risks of generative chatbots. Business Horizons. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4678265 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4678265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R. 2008. Economics of the singularity. IEEE Spectrum. June, 37–42.Google Scholar
Hargadon, A. & Sutton, R. I. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly. 42(2), 716749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, D. A. & Lewis, P. 2012. New perspectives on emergence in economics. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 82(2–3), 329337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, M. R. K. & Hartmann, R. K. 2023. Hiding practices in employee-user innovation. Research Policy. 52(4), 104728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, R. K. 2024. Hieroglyphs, or science fiction icons and the rate and direction of innovation. Innovation, 117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2024.2442303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, R. K., Krabbe, A. D. & Spicer, A. 2022. Towards an untrepreneurial economy? The entrepreneurship industry and the rise of the Veblenian entrepreneur. In Entrepreurialism and society: Consequences and meanings, ed. Eberhart, R. N., Lounsbury, M. & Aldrich, H. E.. Research in the Sociology of Organizations.Google Scholar
Hartmann, R. K., Kärreman, D., Meier, N., Ingerslev, K. & Hauberg, T. M. 2022. Craft, reflexivity and the clinical practice of management. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4071584 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4071584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review. 35(4), 519530.Google Scholar
Henderson, R. M. & Clark, K. B. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35(1), 930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hienerth, C. 2016. Technique innovation. In Revolutionizing innovation: Users, communities, and open innovation, ed. Harhoff, D. & Lakhani, K. R.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. & Yeh, C. 2018. Blitzscaling: The lightning-fast path to building massively valuable companies. Currency.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P. 1983. Networks of power: Electrification of Western society, 1880–1930. John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, R. A., Townsend, D. M., Lerner, D. A. & Browneel, K. M. 2024. Pivot, Perish or Persist? Knowledge problems and the extraordinarily tight boundary conditions of entrepreneurs as scientists. Journal of Business Venturing Insights. 21, e00459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iansiti, M. & Lakhani, K. R. 2017. The truth about Blockchain. Harvard Business Review. 95(1) (January–February 2017), 118127.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, L. B. & Lakhani, K. R. 2010. Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science. 21(5), 10161033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. F. 2009. The burden of knowledge and the “death of the Renaissance man”? Is innovation getting harder? The Review of Economic Studies. 76(1), 283317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. F. 2010. Age and great invention. The Review of Economics and Statistics. XCII(1), 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, B. & Rousseau, P. L. 2005. General purpose technologies. In Handbook of economic growth, ed. Aghion, P. & Durlauf, S. N.. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kärreman, D., Spicer, A. & Hartmann, R. K. 2021. Slow management. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 37(2), 101152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, G. 2012. Netflixed: The epic battle for America’s eyeballs. Portfolio.Google Scholar
Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. 2006. Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science. 17(1), 2244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M. 2020. Understanding persistence. UCD Centre for Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. WP20/23, University College Dublin, UCD Centre for Economic Research, Dublin.Google Scholar
Kesavadev, J., Srinivasan, S., Saboo, B. et al. 2020. The do-it-yourself artificial pancreas: A comprehensive review. Diabetes Therapy. 11, 12171235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-020-00823-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keynes, J. M. 1939. The general theory of employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 51(2), 209223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. A. & Baatartogtokh, B. 2015. How useful is the theory of disruptive innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review. September 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. 1978. Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirzner, I. M. 1999. Creativity and/or alertness: A reconsideration of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur. Review of Austrian Economics. 11(1–2), 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korica, M., Nicolini, D. & Johnson, B. 2017. In search of “managerial work”: Past, present and future of an analytical category. International Journal of Management Reviews. 19(2), 151174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kunda, G. 2006. Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation (revised edition). Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, R. 2005. The Singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. 1990. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lebovitz, S., Lifsitz-Assaf, H. & Levina, N. 2022. To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis. Organization Science. 33(1), 126148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepore, J. 2014. The disruption machine: What the gospel of innovation gets wrong. The New Yorker. June 23, 2014.Google Scholar
Levinthal, D. 1997. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science. 43(7), 934950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewinson, M. 2008. The box: How the shipping container made the world smaller and the world economy bigger. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. B. & Montgomery, D. B. 1988a. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal. 9(S1), 4158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, M. B. & Montgomery, D. B. 1998b. First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal. 19(12), 11111125.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifshitz-Assaf, H. 2018. Dismantling knowledge boundaries at NASA: The critical role of professional identity in open innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 63(4), 746782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217747876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, S. F., Rui, H. & Seidman, A. 2018. Does technology substitute for nurses? Staffing decisions in nursing homes. Management Science. 64(4), 18421859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundvall, B. Å. 2010. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Anthem Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. 2008. An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. MIT Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Mann, C. 2019. The wizard and the prophet: Two remarkable scientists and their dueling visions to shape tomorrow’s world. Knopf.Google Scholar
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science. 2(1), 7187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G., Sproul, L. S. & Tamuz, M. 1991. Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organization Science. 2(1), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, B. & Thiel, P. 2014. Zero to one: Notes on start ups, or how to build the future. Random House.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, M. 2013 (2018). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public and private sector myths. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. 2010. Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world (Chapter 1). University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCraw, T. K. 1995. Creating modern capitalism: How entrepreneurs, companies and countries triumphed in three industrial revolutions. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McCraw, T. K. 2007. Prophet of innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and creative destruction. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Meisenzahl, R. R. & Mokyr, J. 2012. The rate and direction of inventive activity in the British Industrial Revolution: Incentives and institutions. In The rate and direction of inventive activity revisited, ed. Lerner, J. & Stern, S.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Melero, E. & Palomeras, N. 2015. The Renaissance Man is not dead! The role of generalists in teams of inventors. Research Policy. 44(1), 154167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. W. 1959. The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 1971. Managerial work: Analysis from observation. Management Science. 18(2), B97B110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 1973. The nature of managerial work. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. 1990. The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J., Vickers, C. & Ziebarth, N. L. 2015. The history of technological anxiety and the future of economic growth: Is this time different? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 29(3), 3150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. A. 1991 (2006). Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and selling disruptive products to mainstream customers. Collins Business Essentials.Google Scholar
Moreira, S., Markus, A. & Laursen, K. 2018. Knowledge diversity and coordination: The effect of intrafirm inventor task networks on absorption speed. Strategic Management Journal. 39(9), 25172546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morison, E. 1966. Men, machines, and modern times. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, J., Hansen, A. & Hansen, C. Ø. 2009. Long and short translations: Management accounting calculations and innovation management. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 34(6–7), 738754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navis, C. & Glynn, M. A. 2010. How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly. 55(3), 439471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navis, C., Fisher, G., Raffaelli, R. & Glynn, M. A. 2012. The market that wasn’t: The non-emergence of the online grocery category. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Managerial and Organizational Cognition Conference (September 2012).Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, T. 2010. The role of independent invention in US technological development, 1880–1930. The Journal of Economic History. 70(1), 5782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, T. 2019. VC: An American history. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, D., Korica, M. & Ruddle, K. 2015. Staying in the know. MIT Sloan Management Review. 56(4), 5765.Google Scholar
Nightingale, P. & Coad, A. 2013. Muppets and gazelles: Political and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research. Industrial and Corporate Change. 23(1), 113143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. 2020. Are we approaching an economic singularity? Information technology and the future of economic growth. American Economic Journal: Macro-economics. 13(1), 299332.Google Scholar
Nunn, N. 2008. The long-term effects of Africa’s slave trades. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 123(1), 139176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuvolari, A. 2004. Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: The case of the Cornish pumping engine. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 28(3), 347363. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/28.3.347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, P., Zejnilovic, L., Canhão, H. et al. 2015. Innovation by patients with rare diseases and chronic needs. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 10, 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-015-0257-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orr, J. E. 1996. Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. ILR Press.Google Scholar
O’Mara, M. 2020. The code. Silicon Valley and the remaking of America. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Perez, C. 2009. The double bubble at the turn of the century: Technological roots and structural implications. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 33(4), 779805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, C. 2010. Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 34(1), 185202. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pollan, M. 2021. This is your mind on plants. Penguin.Google Scholar
Porter, M. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.Google Scholar
Porter, M. 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W. & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly. 41(1), 116145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preißner, S., Raasch, C. & Schweisfurth, T. 2024. When necessity is the mother of disruption: Users versus producers as sources of disruptive innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 41(1), 6285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaeli, R. 2019. Technology reemergence: Creating new value for old technologies in Swiss Mechanical Watchmaking, 1970–2008. Administrative Science Quarterly. 64(3), 576618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218778505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G. & Tushman, M. 2009. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science. 20(4), 685695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, L. S. 1985. The making of American industrial research: Science and business at GE and Bell, 1876–1926. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reinert, H. & Reinert, E. S. 2006. Creative destruction in economics: Nietzsche, Sombart, Schumpeter. In Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900): Economy and society, ed. Backhaus, J. G. & Drechsler, W.. Springer.Google Scholar
Rennstam, J. & Kärreman, D. 2020. Understanding control in communities of practice: Constructive disobedience in a high-tech firm. Human Relations. 73(6), 864890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repenning, N. P. 2000. Drive out fear (unless you can drive it in): The role of agency and job security in process improvement. Management Science. 46(11), 13851396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, M. & Sauermann, H. 2010. A taste for science? PhD scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Research Policy. 39(3), 422434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, E. M. 2003 (1962). Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Romer, P. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy. 98(5, part 2), 71102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, J. A., Porac, J. F., Runser-Spanjol, J. & Saxon, M.S. 1999. Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. Journal of Marketing. 63(4), 6477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1976. On technological expectations. The Economic Journal. 86(343), 523535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1978. Pressures toward Bigness. Science. 200(4342), 640642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1996. Uncertainty and technological change. In The mosaic of economic growth, ed. Landau, R., Taylor, R. & Wright, G.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. & Birdzell, L. E. 1986. How the West grew rich: The economic transformation of the industrial world. I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. & Trajtenberg, M. 2004. A general-purpose technology at work: The Corliss steam engine in the late nineteenth-century United States. The Journal of Economic History. 64(1), 6199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, A. & Alexy, O. 2014. The nature of innovation. In The Oxford Handbook of innovation management, ed. Dogdson, M., Gann, D. M. & Philips, N., Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Santarelli, E. & Vivarelli, M. 2007. Entrepreneurship and the process of firms’ entry, survival and growth. Industrial and Corporate Change. 16(3), 455488. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1934 (1911). The theory of economic development: The fundamental phenomenon of economic development. In The entrepreneur: Classic texts by Joseph A. Schumpeter, ed. Becker, M., Knudsen, T. & Swedberg, R.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process, Vol. I. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1942/2008. Capitalism, socialism and democracy (Chapter 7). Harper Perennial Modern Thought Edition.Google Scholar
Schweisfurth, T. G. & Raasch, C. 2018. Absorptive capacity for need knowledge: Antecedents and effects for employee innovativeness. Research Policy. 47(4), 687699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, R. F. 2020. “The game has changed.” AI triumphs at protein folding. Science. 370(6521), 11441145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shane, S. 2008. The illusions of Entrepreneurship: The costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shane, S. 2010. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science. 11(4), 448469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, C. & Varian, H. 1998. Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Shih, W. 2016. The real lessons from Kodak’s decline. MIT Sloan Management Review. May 20, 2016.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D. & Simonsohn, U. 2011. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science. 22(11), 13591366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solow, R. M. 1987. We’d better watch out. New York Times Book Review. July 12, 1987, p. 36.Google Scholar
Spicer, A. 2023. Quagmires. Organization Studies. 44(2), 340343. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221131940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, S. 2004. Do scientists pay to be scientists?. Management Science. 50(6), 835853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, M. 2017. Citizens against monopoly. Huffington Post. Posted August 30, 2017; updated August 31, 2017.Google Scholar
Suarez, F. F. & Lanzolla, G. 2007. The role of environmental dynamics in building a first mover advantage theory. Academy of Management Review. 32(2), 377392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tambe, P., Ye, X. & Cappelli, P. 2020. Paying to program? Engineering brand and high-tech wages. Management Science. 66(7), 30103028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, F. W. 1911. The principles of scientific management. Harper & Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy. 15(6), 285305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten Bos, R. 2000. Fashion and utopia in management thinking. John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, P. 2014. From zero to one: Notes on start-ups, or how to build the future. Virgin Books.Google Scholar
Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic geography. 46(sup1), 234240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, D. M., Hunt, R. A., McMullen, J. S. & Sarasvathy, S. D. 2018. Uncertainty, knowledge problems and entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Annals. 12(2), 659687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal. 44(5), 9961004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, A. L., Edmondson, A. C. & Spear, S. 2002. When problem solving prevents organizational learning. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 15(2), 122137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushman, M. L. & O’Reilly, C. A. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review. 38(4), 830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varian, H. R. 2010. Computer mediated transactions. American Economic Review. 100(2), 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincenti, W. G. 1994. The retractable airplane landing gear and the Northrop “anomaly”: Variation, selection and the shaping of technology. Technology and Culture. 35(1), 133.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. 2017. Free innovation. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. & Von Krogh, G. 2015. Crossroads – identifying viable “Need-solution pairs”: Problem solving without problem formulation. Organization Science. 27(1), 207221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T. B. 1994. Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology. 27(1), 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. 1930. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Routledge.Google Scholar
Weinberg, B. A. & Galenson, D. W. 2019. Creative careers: The life cycles of nobel laureates in economics. De Economist. 167, 221239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1996. The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, L., Wang, D. & Evans, J. A. 2019. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature. 566, 378382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, M.-J., Christensen, M., Bloom, N., Sadun, R. & Rivkin, J. 2023. A scientific approach to business strategy. Unpublished Working Paper.Google Scholar
Yang, M.-J., Christensen, M., Bloom, N., Sadun, R. & Rivkin, J. n.d. How do CEO’s make strategy? Management Science. In press.Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. 2015. Big Other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology. 30(1), 7587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuboff, S. 2018. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, E. W. 2016a. Crossing the Chasm to disruptive innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review. March 15, 2016.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, E. W. 2016b. Optimal distinctiveness revisited: An integrative framework for understanding the balance between differentiation and conformity in individual and organizational identities. In The Oxford handbook of organizational identity, ed. Pratt, M. G., Schultz, M., Ashforth, B. E. & Ravasi, D.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×