Adorno, Theodor. 1973. Aktualität der Philosophie (1931). In Gesammelte Schriften Band 1: Philosophische Frühschriften, 325–344. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Aho, Kevin. 2009. Heidegger’s Neglect of the Body. Albany, NY: SUNY.Google Scholar

Alfano, Mark. 2013. The Most Agreeable of All Vices: Nietzsche as Virtue Epistemologist. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (4): 767–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angier, Tom P. S. 2018. Aristotle and the Charge of Egoism. The Journal of Value Inquiry 52 (4): 457–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Annas, Julia. 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Archer, Alfred, and Mills, Georgina. 2019. Anger, Affective Injustice, and Emotion Regulation. Philosophical Topics 47 (2): 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. 1994. Essays in Understanding, 1930–1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism. Ed. Kohn, Jerome. New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar

Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, Vol. 2. Ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle. 1984a. Metaphysica. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, Vol. 2. Ed. Jonathan Barnes, trans. W. D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle. 1984b. Nichomachean Ethics. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, Vol. 2. Ed. Jonathan Barnes, trans. W. D. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle. 1984c. Rhetoric. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, Vol. 2. Ed. Jonathan Barnes, trans. Rhys Roberts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle. 2001. Metaphysica. In The Basic Works of Aristotle. Ed. McKeon, Richard, trans. Ross, W. D.. London: Modern Library.Google Scholar

Arrien, Sophie-Jan. 2013. Faith’s Knowledge: On Heidegger’s Reading of Saint Paul. Gatherings 8: 30–49.Google Scholar

Augustine, Saint. 2008. The Confessions. Trans. Henry Chadwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Augustine, Saint. 1982. Eighty-Three Different Questions. Trans. David L. Mosher. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Augustine, Saint. 1887a. Augustin’s City of God and Christian Doctrine. Ed. Philip Schaff, rev. ed. Knight, Kevin, trans. Dods, Marcus. Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Augustine, Saint. 1887b. Expositions on the Psalm. Ed. Philip Schaff, rev. ed. Knight, Kevin, trans. Tweed, James. Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Baehr, Jason S. 2011. The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barash, Jeffrey. 2005. Historical Meaning in the Fundamental Ontology of Being and Time. In Heidegger’s Being and Time: Critical Essays, 169–188. Ed. Richard Polt. Lanham, Boulder, NY: Roman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1970. Originative Thinking in the Later Philosophy of Heidegger. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (3): 368–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1990. Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bauer, Nancy. 2006. Beauvoir’s Heideggerean Ontology. In The Philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Critical Essays, 65–91. Ed. Margaret A. Simons. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Beauvoir, Simone de. [1949] 2011. The Second Sex. Trans. Constance Borde and Sheila Malovany-Chavallier. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Bernasconi, Robert. 2002. Hannah Arendt, Phenomenology and Political Theory. In Phenomenology World-Wide: Foundations, Expanding Dynamics, Life-Engagements, 645–647. Ed. Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigwood, Carol. 1993. Earth Muse: Feminism, Nature and Art. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Blattner, William D. 1994a. Is Heidegger a Kantian Idealist? Inquiry 37 (2): 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blattner, William D. 1994b. The Concept of Death in Being and Time. Man and World 27: 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blattner, William D. 1999a. Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blattner, William D. 1999b. Is Heidegger a Representationalist? Philosophical Topics 27 (2): 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blattner, William D. 2005. Temporality. In A Companion to Heidegger, 311–324. Eds. Hubert Dreyfus and Mark Wrathall. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blattner, William D. 2006. Heidegger’s Being and Time. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Blattner, William D. 2013. Authenticity and Resoluteness. In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, 320–337. Ed. Mark Wrathall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blattner, William D. 2014. Essential Guilt and Transcendental Conscience. In Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self: Themes from Division Two of “Being and Time,” 116–134. Ed. Denis McManus. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornstein, Kate. 1994. Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women and the Rest of Us. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making it Explicit. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. 1997. Dasein, the Being that Thematizes. Epoché 5 (1/2): 1–38.Google Scholar

Braver, Lee. 2007. A Thing of This World: A History of Continental Anti-Realism. Evanston, IL: North Western University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braver, Lee, ed. 2015. Division III of Heidegger’s Being and Time: The Unanswered Question of Being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broadie, Sarah. 1991. Ethics with Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brogan, Walter. 1990. A Response to Robert Bernasconi’s Heidegger’s Destruction of Phronesis. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (S1): 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burch, Matthew. 2020. Giving a Damn about Getting it Right: Heideggerian Constitutivism and Our Reasons to be Authentic. In Transcending Reason: Heidegger on Rationality, 99–122. Eds. Matthew Burch and Irene McMullin. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Caldwell, Anne. 2002. Transforming Sacrifice: Irigaray and the Politics of Sexual Difference. Hypatia 17 (4): 16–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2001. The Absence of Monica: Heidegger, Derrida and Augustine’s Confessions. In Feminst Interpretations of Martin Heidegger, 149–164. Eds. Nancy Holland and Patricia Huntington. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2020. Being and Beings: The Ontological / Ontic Distinction. In 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology, 25–30. Eds. Gail Weiss, Ann Murphy, and Gayle Salamon 2020. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carman, Taylor. 2003. Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carman, Taylor. 2013. The Question of Being. In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, 84–99. Ed. Mark Wrathall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. 1932. The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language. Trans. Arthur Pap. In Logical Positivism, 60–81. Ed. Alfred Jules Ayer, 1959. NY: Free PressGoogle Scholar

Cerbone, David R. 1996. World, World-Entry, and Realism. Inquiry 38 (4): 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerbone, David R. 1999. Composition and Constitution: Heidegger’s Hammer. Philosophical Topics 27 (2): 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerbone, David R. 2007. Realism and Truth. In A Companion to Heidegger, 248–264. Eds. Hubert Dreyfus and Mark Wrathall. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerbone, David R. 2015. Making Sense of Phenomenological Sense-Making: Moore on Husserl. Philosophical Topics 43 (1/2): 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerbone, David R. 2016. Exile and Return: From Phenomenology to Naturalism (and Back Again). International Journal of Philosophical Studies 24 (3): 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerbone, David R. 2017. Phenomenological Method and the Achievement of Recognition: Who’s Been Waiting for Phenomenology? In The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology, 295–316. Eds. Giuseppina D’Oro and Soren Overgaard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerbone, David R. 2019. Essay Review: Social Epistemology Meets Heideggerian Ontology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (76): 94–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Ruth. 2004. Putting Together Morality and Well-Being. In Practical Conflicts: New Philosophical Essays, 118–158. Eds. Peter Betzler and Monika Baumann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chanter, Tina. 1995. Ethics of Eros: Irigaray’s Rewriting of the Philosophers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chanter, Tina. 2001. The Problematic Normative Assumptions of Heidegger’s Ontology. In Feminist Interpretations of Martin Heidegger, 73–108. Eds. Nancy Holland and Patricia Huntington. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Chappell, Timothy. 2012. Varieties of Knowledge in Plato and Aristotle. Topoi 31 (2): 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, David E. 1997. Wittgenstein, Heidegger and Humility. Philosophy 72 (279): 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Correia, Fabrice, and Benjamin Schneider, , eds. 2012. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowe, Benjamin D. 2006. Heidegger’s Religious Origins. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 1984. Meaning and the Ontological Difference. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 32: 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2000. Metaphysics, Metontology, and the End of Being and Time. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2): 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2001. Subjectivity: Locating the First-Person in Being and Time. Inquiry 44 (4): 433–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2005. Heidegger and Husserl: The Matter and Method of Philosophy. In A Companion to Heidegger, 49–64. Eds. Hubert Dreyfus and Mark Wrathall. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2007. Sorge or Selbstbewusstsein? Heidegger and Korsgaard on the Sources of Normativity. European Journal of Philosophy 15 (3): 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2013. Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2013a. Being Answerable: Reason-Giving and the Ontological Meaning of Discourse. In Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger, 214–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2013b. Conscience and Reason. In Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger, 191–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2013c. The Existential Sources of Normativity. In Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger, 239–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2013d. Making Meaning Thematic. In Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger, 9–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2014. Responsibility, Autonomy, Affectivity: A Heideggerian Approach. In Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self: Themes from Division Two of “Being and Time,” 215–242. Ed. Denis McManus. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2017. Exemplary Necessity: Heidegger, Pragmatism, and Reason. In Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology, 242–256. Eds. Ondrej Švec and Jakub Čapek. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2018. The Middle Heidegger’s Phenomenological Metaphysics. In Phenomenology the Basics, 229–250. Ed. Dan Zahavi. NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2020. Transcending Reason Heidegger’s Way. In Transcending Reason: Heidegger on Rationality, 17–52. Eds. Matthew Burch and Irene McMullin. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven G. 2022. Commitment: What is Self-Binding, and How is it Possible? In Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology, 29–46. Eds. Patricio Fernández, Alejandro Néstor García Martínez, and José Torralba. Basel: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, Steven, and Malpas, Jeff, eds. 2007. Transcendental Heidegger. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 1999. Time’s Passing. The Modern Schoolman 76 (2/3): 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2009. Temptation, Self-Possession, and Resoluteness: Heidegger’s Reading of Confessions X and What Is the Good of Being and Time? Research in Phenomenology 39 (2): 248–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2013. The Heidegger Dictionary. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Dahlstrom, Daniel O. 2021. The Topic of Sense in Being and Time. In Heidegger and his Anglo-American Reception: A Comprehensive Approach, 117–134. Eds. Pietro D’Oriano and John Rogove. Basel: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dancy, Jonathan. 1995. Supervenience, Virtues and Consequences: A Commentary on Knowledge in Perspective by Ernest Sosa. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 78 (3): 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeGrazia, David. 2017. The Definition of Death. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/death-definition/.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jaques. 1983. Geschlecht: Sexual Difference, Ontological Difference. Research in Phenomenology 13 (1): 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devitt, Michael. 1997. Realism and Truth. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Diprose, Rosalyn. 1994. The Bodies of Women: Ethics, Embodiment and Sexual Difference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

D’Oro, Giuseppina, and Overgaard, Søren. 2017. The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1991. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Rubin, Jane. 1991. Appendix: Kierkegaard, Division II, and Later Heidegger. In Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I, 283–340. Ed. Hubert Dreyfus. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Wrathall, Mark, eds. 2007. A Companion to Heidegger. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Edwards, Paul. 1976. Heidegger and Death: A Deflationary Critique. The Monist 59 (2): 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engel, Pascal. 2018. The Epistemic Vice of Curiosity. In The Moral Psychology of Curiosity, 265–289. Eds. Ilhan Inan, Lani Watson, Dennis Whitcomb, and Safiye Yigit. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, Gareth. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Fernandez, Anthony Vincent. 2022. Feminist Phenomenology and Essentialism. Presentation at Social and Political Philosophy Colloquium Series, University of Groningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar

Figal, Günter. 1988. Martin Heidegger. Phänomenologie der Freiheit. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.Google Scholar

Figal, Günter. 2010. Phenomenology: Heidegger after Husserl and the Greeks. In Martin Heidegger: Key Concepts, 33–43. Ed. Bret Davis. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fink, Eugen. 1995. Sixth Cartesian Meditation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, Tony. 2010. Heidegger and the Narrativity Debate. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (2): 241–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischer, Margot. 1991. Die Zeitanalysen in Heidegger’s Sein und Zeit: Aporien, Probleme und ein Ausblick. Würzburg: Könighausen &Neumann.Google Scholar

Franzen, Winfried. 1975. Von der Existenzialontologie zur Seinsgeschichte. Eine Untersuchung über die Entwicklung der Philosophie Martin Heideggers. Meisenheim: Hain.Google Scholar

Franzen, Winfried. 1976. Martin Heidegger. Stuttgart: Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. 1980. The Foundations of Arithmetic. Trans. John Langshaw Austin. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, Lauren. 2011. Reconsidering Relational Autonomy: A Feminist Approach to Selfhood and the Other in the Thinking of Martin Heidegger. Inquiry 54 (4): 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fried, Gregory. 2000. Heidegger’s Polemos: From Being to Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Michael. 2000. A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Gallegos, Francisco. 2021. Affective Injustice and Fundamental Affective Goods. Journals of Social Philosophy 53 (2): 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garcia, Manon. 2021. We Are Not Born Submissive: How Patriarchy Shapes Women’s Lives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Golob, Sacha. 2014. Heidegger on Concepts, Freedom and Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golob, Sacha. 2020. What Does it Mean to ‘Act in the Light of’ a Norm? In Transcending Reason: Heidegger on Rationality, 79–98. Eds. Matthew Burch and Irene McMullin. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golob, Sacha. Forthcoming. Heidegger’s Perversion of Virtue Ethics, 1924. In Heidegger and the Classics. Ed. Aaron Turner. NY: SUNY Press. forthcoming.Google Scholar

Gordon, Peter E. 2010. Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, Peter E. 2018. Adorno and Existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gothlin, Eva. 2003. Reading Simone de Beauvoir with Martin Heidegger. In The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir, 45–65. Ed. Claudia Card. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graybeal, Jean. 1990. Language and “the Feminine” in Nietzsche and Heidegger. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Greco, John, and Reibsamen, Jonathan. 2017. Reliabilist Virtue Epistemology. In The Oxford Handbook of Virtue, 725–746. Ed. Nancy Snow. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grisebach, Eberhard. 1928. Gegenwart, eine kritische Ethik. Halle‐Saale: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Grisebach, Eberhard. 1930. Interpretation oder Destruktion. Zum kritischen Verständnis von Martin Heideggers Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Deutsche Vierteljahrschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 8 (1): 199–232.Google Scholar

Guenther, Lisa. 2008. Being-From-Others: Reading Heidegger after Cavarero. Hypatia 23 (1): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guignon, Charles. 1993. Authenticity, Moral Values, and Psychotherapy. In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, 215–239. Ed. Charles Guignon. NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guignon, Charles. 2000. Philosophy and Authenticity: Heidegger’s Search for a Ground for Philosophizing. In Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, Volume 1, 79–102. Eds. Mark Wrathall and Jeff Malpas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Guignon, Charles. 2013. In Search of Authenticity: A Heideggerian Quest. The Humanistic Psychologist 41 (3): 204–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guignon, Charles, and Pereboom, Derk. 2001. Existentialism: Basic Writings. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Han-Pile, Béatrice. 2013. Freedom and the “Choice to Choose Oneself” in Being and Time. In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, 291–319. Ed. Mark Wrathall. NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haugeland, John. 1982. Heidegger on Being a Person. Noûs 16 (1): 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haugeland, John. 1989. Dasein’s Disclosedness. In Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. Ed. Rouse, Joseph 2013, 17–39. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Haugeland, John. 2000. Truth and Finitude: Heidegger’s Transcendental Existentialism. In Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. Ed. Rouse, Joseph 2013, 187–220. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Haugeland, John. 2007. Letting Be. In Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. Ed. Rouse, Joseph 2013, 167–178. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Haugeland, John. 2013. Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. Ed. Rouse, Joseph. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haugeland, John. 2013a. The Being Question. In Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. Ed. Rouse, Joseph 2013, 51–63. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haugeland, John. 2013b. Dasein. In Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. Ed. Rouse, Joseph 2013, 76–82. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haugeland, John. 2013c. Proposal for a Guggenheim Fellowship. In Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. Ed. Rouse, Joseph 2013, 44–47. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2007. “Kehre”? “Sagen der Kehre”. Jahresgabe der Martin-Heidegger-Gesellschaft 2007.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2008. “Eine gefährliche Irrnis”. Jahresgabe der Martin-Heidegger-Gesellschaft 2008.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2009. Das Eigentümliche. Jahresgabe der Martin-Heidegger-Gesellschaft 2009.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2010. Das Geringe. Jahresgabe der Martin-Heidegger-Gesellschaft 2010.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2011/12. Auszüge zur Phänomenologie aus dem Manuskript Vermächtnis der Seinsfrage. Jahresgabe der Martin-Heidegger-Gesellschaft 2011/12.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2013/14. Das Argument gegen den Brauch (für das Ansichsein des Seienden). Jahresgabe der Martin-Heidegger-Gesellschaft 2013/14.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 2015/16. Das Wegfeld des Denkens. Eds. Dietmar Koch and Klaus Neugebauer. Jahresgabe der Martin-Heidegger-Gesellschaft 2015/16.Google Scholar

Heinz, Marion. 2001. Das eigentliche Ganzseinkönnen des Daseins und die Zeitlichkeit als der ontologische Sinn der Sorge (§§ 61–66). In Martin Heidegger: Sein und Zeit, 161–188. Ed. Thomas Rentsch, 2015. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinz, Marion. 2019. Zeitlichkeit und Geschichtlichkeit. Zur Kritik von Sein und Zeit im Anschluß an Julius Kraft und Eberhard Grisebach. In Heinz and Bender 2019, 255–287.Google Scholar

Hepburn, Ronald W. 1980. The Inaugural Address: Wonder. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 54: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbs, Thomas S. 1999. Aquinas, Virtue, and Recent Epistemology. The Review of Metaphysics 52 (3): 573–594.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 2008. Leviathan. Ed. Gaskin, John Charles Addison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Piotr. 2000. Heidegger and the Problem of Idealism. Inquiry 43 (4): 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, Nancy J. 2001. The Universe is Made of Stories, Not of Atoms: Heidegger and the Feminine They-Self. In Feminst Interpretations of Martin Heidegger, 128–148. Eds. Nancy Holland and Patricia Huntington. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

hooks, bell. 1984. Feminist Theory from Margin to Centre. Boston, MA: Southend Press.Google Scholar

Huntington, Patricia. 2001. Introduction I – General Background: History of the Feminist Reception of Heidegger and a Guide to Heidegger’s Thought. In Feminst Interpretations of Martin Heidegger, 1–42. Eds. Nancy Holland and Patricia Huntington. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1965. Philosophy as Rigorous Science. In Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, 71–147. Trans. Quentin Lauer. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: Second Book. Trans. Richard Rojcewicz and Frederick Kersten. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1997. Phenomenology and Anthropology. In Psychological and Transcendental Phenomenology and the Confrontation with Heidegger (1927–1931). Trans. and ed. Sheehan, Thomas and Palmer, Richard E.. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 2014. Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Trans. Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Inan, Ilhan. 2017. The Philosophy of Curiosity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kafka, Franz. [1925] 1998. The Trial. Trans. Breon Mitchell. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. [1783] 1902. Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 4: Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik. Eds. Reicke, Rudolf and der Wissenschaften, Preussische Akademie. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. [1784] 1902. Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 4: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Eds. Erdmann, Benno, Menzer, Paul, Höfler, Alois and der Wissenschaften, Preussische Akademie. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel.[1798] 1907. Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 7: Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht. Eds. Vorländer, Karl, Külpe, Oswald and der Wissenschaften, Preussische Akademie. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1900. Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 11: Briefe, 1789–1794. Eds. Reicke, Rudolf and der Wissenschaften, Preussische Akademie. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. [1781/87] 1968. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Norman Kemp Smith. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kaplan, David. 2004. The Meaning of Ouch and Oops. Presentation at Howison Lecture in Philosophy, University of California, Berkeley. http://eecoppock.info/PragmaticsSoSe2012/kaplan.pdf.Google Scholar

Keiling, Tobias. 2017. Heidegger’s Black Notebooks and the Logic of a History of Being. Research in Phenomenology 47 (3): 406–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keiling, Tobias. 2018. Phenomenology and Ontology in the Later Heidegger. In Phenomenology the Basics, 251–267. Ed. Dan Zahavi. NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keiling, Tobias. 2022. Worlds, Worlding: Heidegger on Ontological Pluralism. Epoché 27 (2): 273–295.Google Scholar

Keiling, Tobias, and Moore, Ian Alexander. 2022a. Martin Heidegger, The argument against need (for the being-in-Itself of entities). British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30 (3): 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keiling, Tobias, and Moore, Ian Alexander. 2022b. Martin Heidegger, Das Argument gegen den Brauch (für das Ansichsein des Seienden). Eds. Dietmar Koch and Michael Ruppert. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30 (3): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knowles, Charlotte. 2017. Das Man and Everydayness: A New Interpretation. In From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, 29–52. Eds. Hans Bernhard Schmid and Gerhard Thonhauser. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knowles, Charlotte. 2019. Beauvoir on Women’s Complicity in their own Unfreedom. Hypatia 34 (2): 242–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knowles, Charlotte. 2021a. Responsibility in Cases of Structural and Personal Complicity: A Phenomenological Analysis. The Monist 104 (2): 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knowles, Charlotte. 2021b. Articulating Understanding: A Phenomenological Approach to Testimony on Gendered Violence. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 29 (4): 448–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knowles, Charlotte. 2022. Beyond Adaptive Preferences: Rethinking Women’s Complicity in Their own Subordination. European Journal of Philosophy 30 (4): 1317–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kochan, Jeff. 2017. Science as Social Existence: Heidegger and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Køster, Allan, and Fernandez, Anthony Vincent. 2021. Investigating Modes of Being in the World: An Introduction to Phenomenologically Grounded Qualitative Research. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 22 (1): 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraft, Julius. 1932. Von Husserl zu Heidegger: Kritik der phänomenologischen Philosophie. Leipzig: Buske.Google Scholar

Kraft, Julius. 1941. The Philosophy of Existence. Its Structure and Significance. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1 (3): 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kukla, Rebecca. 2002. The Ontology and Temporality of Conscience. Continental Philosophy Review 35 (1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. 2000. Heidegger, Language, and World-Disclosure. Trans. Graham Harman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lear, Jonathan. 2011. A Case for Irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lear, Jonathan. 2006. Radical Hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leland, Dorothy. 2001. Conflictual Culture and Authenticity: Deepening Heidegger’s Account of the Social. In Feminist Interpretations of Martin Heidegger, 109–127. Eds. Nancy Holland and Patricia Huntington. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Lévinas, Emmanuel. 1995. The Theory of Intuition in Husserl’s Phenomenology. Trans. Andre Orianne. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, Michael. 2005. Heidegger and the Place of Ethics: Being-With in the Crossing of Heidegger’s Thought. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Genevieve. [1984] 1993. The Man of Reason: “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Marten, Rainer. 2017. Martin Heidegger: Das Sein selbst. In Heideggers Weg in die Moderne: eine Verortung der ‘Schwarzen Hefte,’ 229–241. Eds. Hans-Helmuth Gander and Magnus Striet. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCall, Corey. 2011. Some Philosophical Ambiguities of Curiosity in the Work of Heidegger, Foucault, and Gadamer. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 42 (2): 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDaniel, Kris. 2016. Heidegger and the “There Is” of Being. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (2): 306–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDowell, John. 1998. Mind, Value and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McManus, Denis. 2012. Heidegger and the Measure of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, Denis. 2013. Ontological Pluralism and the Being and Time Project. Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (4): 651–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, Denis. 2015. Being-Towards-Death and Owning One’s Judgment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (2): 245–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, Denis. 2017. Beholdenness to Entities and the Concept of “Dasein”: Phenomenology, Ontology and Idealism in the early Heidegger. European Journal of Philosophy 25 (2): 512–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, Denis. 2018. Vision, Norm and Openness: Some Themes in Heidegger, Murdoch and Aristotle. In Aspect Perception After Wittgenstein: Seeing-As and Novelty, 173–198. Eds. Michael Beaney, Branden Harrington, and Dominic Shaw. NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, Denis. 2019. On a Judgment of One’s Own: Heideggerian Authenticity, Standpoints, and All Things Considered. Mind 128 (512): 1181–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, Denis. 2020. Heidegger and Aristotle on Reason, Choice and Self-Expression: On Decisionists, Nihilists, and Pluralists. In Transcending Reason: Heidegger on Rationality, 125–150. Eds. Matthew Burch and Irene McMullin. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, Denis. 2022a. Authenticity, Deliberation and Perception: On Heidegger’s Reading and Appropriation of Aristotle’s Concept of Phronêsis. Journal of the History of Philosophy 60 (1): 125–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, Denis. 2022b. Heidegger, Being, and All That Is and Is So: On Paradoxes, and Questions, of Being. In Heidegger on Logic, 133–158. Eds. Filippo Casati and Daniel Dahlstrom. NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McManus, Denis. Forthcoming. Why Does Authenticity Matter in Being and Time? Heidegger and Aristotle on the Good, Being Oneself, and the Unity of Being. In Turner forthcoming.Google Scholar

McMullin, Irene. 2019. Existential Flourishing: A Phenomenology of the Virtues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McMullin, Irene. 2013. Time and the Shared World: Heidegger on Social Relations. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullin, Irene. Forthcoming. Patience and Virtuous Passivity. In The Virtue of Patience. Eds. Matthew Pianalto and Sarah A. Schnitker. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, William. 1999. The Glance of the Eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Ends of Theory. Albany, NY: SUNY.Google Scholar

McNeill, William. 2020. The Fate of Phenomenology. Heidegger’s Legacy. Lanham/London: Rowman & Littlefield.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McTaggart, J. Ellis. 1908. The Unreality of Time. Mind 17 (68): 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miščević, Nenad. 2020. Curiosity as an Epistemic Virtue. Palgrave Innovations in Philosophy. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, Adrian W. 2014. The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mulhall, Stephen. [1996] 2005. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Heidegger and Being and Time. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller‐Lauter, Wolfgang. 1960. Möglichkeit und Wirklichkeit bei Martin Heidegger. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murdoch, Iris. 2014. The Sovereignty of Good. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nagel, Mechthild. 2001. Throwness, Playing-in-the-World. In Feminist Interpretations of Martin Heidegger, 289–308. Eds. Nancy Holland and Patricia Huntington. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Nicholson, Graeme. 1996. The Ontological Difference. American Philosophical Quarterly 33 (4): 357–374.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Mahon. 2010. Re-Assessing the ‘Affair’: The Heidegger Controversy Revisited. The Social Science Journal 47 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Philipse, Herman. 1998. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being: A Critical Interpretation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Plato, . 1997. Republic. Trans. Georges Maximilien Antoine Grube, rev. Charles David Chanel Reeve. In Complete Works, 971–1223. Ed. Cooper, J. M.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Plutarch, . 1939. On Being a Busybody. In Moralia Volume VI, 469–517. Ed. Henderson, Jeffrey, trans. Helmbold, W. C.. London: Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar

Pöggeler, Otto. 1972. Philosophie und Politik bei Heidegger. Freiburg/München: Alber.Google Scholar

Pöggeler, Otto. 1983. Zeit und Sein bei Heidegger. In Zeit und Zeitlichkeit bei Husserl und Heidegger, 152–191. Ed. Ernst Wolfgang Orth. Freiburg/München: Alber.Google Scholar

Polt, Richard. 2006. The Emergency of Being: On Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Polt, Richard. 2011. Meaning, Excess and Event. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual 1: 26–53.Google Scholar

Polt, Richard. 2020. A Running Leap into the There: Heidegger’s Running Notes on Being and Time. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 41 (1): 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, Anne Waldegrave. 2011. Virtue and Reason in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1981. Reason, Truth, and History. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1988. Representation and Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, William V. O. 1954. The Scope and Language of Science. In The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays 1976, 228–245. Rev. and enl. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, William V. O. 1955. Posits and Reality. In The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays 1976, 246–254. Rev. and enl. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, William V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Quine, William V. O. 1969. Epistemology Naturalized. In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, 69–91. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, William J. 1963. Letter to William J. Richardson, April 1962. In Through Phenomenology to Thought, viii–xxiv. Trans. William J. Richardson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Risser, James, ed. 1999. Heidegger toward the Turn: Essays on the Work of the 1930s. NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, Robert Campbell, and Jay Wood, William. 2007. Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, Lewis. 2020. The Virtue of Curiosity. Episteme 17 (1): 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouse, Joseph. 1990. Knowledge and Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Rouse, Joseph. 2013. Editor’s Introduction. In Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger, vii–xl. Ed. Rouse, Joseph. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sanford, Douglas. 1972. Begging the Question. Analysis 32 (6): 197–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartre, Jean-Paul. [1943] 2018. Being and Nothingness. Trans. Sarah Richmond. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schalow, Frank. 2004. How Viable is Dreyfus’s Interpretation of Heidegger? Anthropologism, Pragmatism, and Misunderstanding of Texts. Heidegger Studies 20: 17–33.Google Scholar

Schear, Joseph. 2015. Phenomenology and Metaphysics: On Moore’s Heidegger. Philosophical Topics 43 (1/2): 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmid, Hans B. 2017. Authentic Role Play: A Political Solution to an Existential Paradox. In From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, 261–274. Eds. Hans Bernhard Schmid and Gerhard Thonhauser. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Stefan W. 2016. Grund und Freiheit. Eine phänomenologische Untersuchung des Freiheitsbegriffs Heideggers. Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitz, Hermann. 1996. Husserl und Heidegger. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar

Scott, Joan W. 1988. Deconstructing Equality-Versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism. Feminist Studies 14 (1): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy and Performativity. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Sheehan, Thomas. 1984. Time and Being, 1925–27. In Thinking about Being: Aspects of Heidegger’s Thought, 177–219. Eds. Robert Shahan and Jitendra Nath Mohanty. Norman, Oklahoma: Oklahoma University Press.Google Scholar

Sheehan, Thomas. 2014. Making Sense of Heidegger: a Paradigm Shift. London: Rowman & Littlefield.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Michael P. 1987. Virtuous Circles. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (2): 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorenson, Roy A. 1991. ‘P, Therefore P’ Without Circularity. Journal of Philosophy 88 (5): 245–266.Google Scholar

Stone, Alison. 2004. On the Genealogy of Women: A Defence of Anti-Essentialism. In Third Wave Feminism: A Critical Exploration, 85–96. Eds. Stacy Gillis, Gillian Howie, and Rebecca Munford. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroud, Barry. 1984. The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroud, Barry. 2000. Meaning, Understanding, and Practice: Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stroud, Barry. 2000a. Quine on Exile and Acquiescence. In Meaning, Understanding, and Practice, 151–169. Ed. Steward Candlish, 2002. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tengelyi, László. 2014. Welt und Unendlichkeit. Zum Problem phänomenologischer Metaphysik. Freiburg: Alber.Google Scholar

Thanassas, Panagiotis. 2012. Phronesis vs. Sophia: On Heidegger’s Ambivalent Aristotelianism. The Review of Metaphysics 66 (1): 31–59.Google Scholar

Thomson, Iain. 2005. Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, Iain. 2013. Death and Demise in Being and Time. In The Cambridge Companion to Being and Time, 260–290. Ed. Mark Wrathall. NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, Iain. 2021. Death (Tod). In The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon, 210–220. Ed. Mark Wrathall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Truwant, Simon. 2022. Cassirer and Heidegger in Davos: The Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tugendhat, Ernst. 2001. Aufsätze 1992–2000. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Turner, Jason. 2010. Ontological Pluralism. The Journal of Philosophy 107 (1): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vigo, Alejandro G. 2010. Autoreferencia práctica y normatividad. In Reflexion, Gefühl, Identität im Anschluß an Kant/Reflection, Emotion, Identity. From Kant Onwards, 197–224. Eds. Ana Marta González and Alejandro Vigo. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Vigo, Alejandro G. 2016. Practical Identity and Individuality. In Action, Reason, and Truth: Studies in Aristotle’s Conception of Practical Rationality, 203–226. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar

Vlastos, Gregory. 1954. The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides. The Philosophical Review 63 (3): 319–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Volpi, Franco. 1989. Sein und Zeit: Homologien zur Nikomachischen Ethik. Philosophisches Jahrbuch 96: 225–240.Google Scholar

Walsh, Patrick G. 1988. The Rights and Wrongs of Curiosity (Plutarch to Augustine). Greece & Rome 35 (1): 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitcomb, Dennis, Battaly, Heather, Baehr, Jason, and Howard-Snyder, Daniel. 2017. Intellectual Humility: Owning Our Limitations. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (3): 509–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whiting, Jennifer. 2002. Eudaimonia, External Results, and Choosing Virtuous Actions for Themselves. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2): 270–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiggins, David. 1987. Needs, Values, Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Withy, Katherine. 2015. Being and the Sea: Being as Phusis, and Time. In Division III of Heidegger’s Being and Time: The Unanswered Question of Being, 311–328. Ed. Lee Braver. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Withy, Katherine. 2022. Heidegger on Being Self-Concealing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witt, Charlotte. 2011. The Metaphysics of Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woessner, Martin V. 2011. Heidegger in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wolin, Richard. 1990. The Politics of Being. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Wrathall, Mark. 2011. Heidegger on Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wrathall, Mark. 2014a. Autonomy, Authenticity, and the Self. In Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self: Themes From Division Two of Being and Time, 193–214. Ed. Denis McManus. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wrathall, Mark. 2015. ‘Demanding Authenticity of Ourselves’: Heidegger on Authenticity as an Extra-Moral Ideal. In Horizons of Authenticity in Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Moral Psychology: Essays in Honor of Charles Guignon, 347–368. Eds. Megan Altman and Hans Pedersen. Dodrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wrathall, Mark. 2017a. Making Sense of Human Existence (Heidegger on the Limits of Practical Familiarity). In Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology, 227–241. Eds. Ondrej Švec and Jakub Čapek. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wrathall, Mark. 2017b. Who is the Self of Everyday Existence? In From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, 9–28. Eds. Hans Bernhard Schmid and Gerhard Thonhauser. Cham: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wrathall, Mark, and Murphy, Max. 2013. An Overview of Being and Time. In The Cambridge Companion to Being and Time, 1–53. Ed. Mark Wrathall. NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, Sarah. 2017. Virtue Responsibilism. In The Oxford Handbook of Virtue, 747–764. Ed. Nancy Snow. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Julian. 2015. Was There a “Turn” in Heidegger’s Philosophy? In Division III of Heidegger’s Being and Time: The Unanswered Question of Being, 329–347. Ed. Lee Braver. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zagury-Orly, Raphael. 2015. D’une forclusion dans la phenomenology de la vie religieuse. In Cohen and Zagury-Orly 2015, 723–43. Paris: La règle du jeu.Google Scholar

Zagzebski, Linda T. 1996. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zoller, David. 2021. Heidegger on Aristotelian Phronêsis and Moral Justification. European Journal of Philosophy 29 (4): 778–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar