Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-vqtzn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T23:17:16.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2025

Zachary Herz
Zachary Herz
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The God and the Bureaucrat
Roman Law, Imperial Sovereignty, and Other Stories
 , pp. 355 - 397
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abdy, Richard, and Harling, Nicholas. “Two Important New Roman Coins.” NC 165 (2005): 175–81.Google Scholar
Adams, Alison. “The Arch of Hadrian at Athens.” In The Greek Renaissance in the Roman Empire, edited by Walker, Susan and Cameron, Averil, 10–16. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 1989.Google Scholar
Adams, Wendy. Popular Culture and Legal Pluralism: Narrative as Law. London: Routledge, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Eric. “Cassius Dio’s Livia and the Conspiracy of Cinna Magnus.” GRBS 51 (2011): 133–54.Google Scholar
Africa, Thomas. “Adam Smith, the Wicked Knight, and the Use of Anecdotes.” G&R 42 (1995): 70–75.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio Stato di eccezione. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri, 2003.Google Scholar
Albanese, Bernardo. “Volontà negoziale e forma in una testimonianza di Q. Mucio Scevola.” In De iustitia et iure: Festgabe für Ulrich von Lübtow, edited by Harder, Manfred and Thielmann, Georg, 155–61. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1980.Google Scholar
Alonso, José Luis. “Customary Law and Legal Pluralism in the Roman Empire: The Status of Peregrine Law in Egypt.” JJP 43 (2013): 351–404.Google Scholar
Álvarez, Luis Rodríguez. “Algunas notas en torno a la lex de vicesima hereditatum.” RIDA 28 (1981): 213–46.Google Scholar
Amelotti, Mario. “Reichsrecht, Volksrecht, Provinzialrecht: vecchi problemi e nuovi documenti.” SDHI 65 (1999): 211–15.Google Scholar
Ando, Clifford. “Exemplum, Analogy, and Precedent in Roman Law.” In Lowrie, and Lüdemann, , eds., Exemplarity and Singularity, 111–22. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Ando, Clifford Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Ando, Clifford Imperial Rome AD 193 to 284: The Critical Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, Clifford “The Ambitions of Government: Territoriality and Infrastructural Power in Ancient Rome.” In Ancient States and Infrastructural Power: Europe, Asia, and America, edited by Ando, Clifford and Richardson, Seth, 115–48. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, Clifford “The Origins and Import of Republican Constitutionalism.” Cardozo Law Review 34 (2013): 917–36.Google Scholar
Ando, Clifford, ed. Citizenship and Empire in Europe 200–1900: The Antonine Constitution after 1800 Years. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2016.Google Scholar
de Angelis, Francesco. “The Emperor’s Justice and Its Spaces in Rome and Italy.” In Spaces of Justice in the Roman World, edited by de Angelis, Francesco, 127–59. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, Vicente. “Testi e documenti I: Una cognitio dell’imperatore Caracalla in Siria.” BIDR 49 (1948): 46–57.Google Scholar
Arcaria, Francesco. Referre ad principem: Contributo allo studio delle epistulae imperiali in età classica. Milan: Giuffrè, 2000.Google Scholar
Archi, Gian. Teodosio II e la sua codificazione. Naples: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane, 1976.Google Scholar
Ascheri, Mario. The Laws of Late Medieval Italy (1000–1500): Foundations for a European Legal System. Boston: Brill, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, Mitchell, and Söllner, Alfons, eds. Forced Migration and Scientific Change: Emigre German-Speaking Scientists and Scholars after 1933. Washington, D.C.; Cambridge: German Historical Institute; Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astolfi, Riccardo. “Abiti maschili e femminili.” Labeo 17 (1971): 33–39.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bablitz, Leanne. Actors and Audience in the Roman Courtroom. London; New York: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babusiaux, Ulrike. “Les défauts de l’utilisation du ‘ius controversum’ en tant que concept herméneutique de droit romain.” In La Controverse: Etudes d’histoire de l’argumentation juridique, edited by Thénard, Nicolas Cornu, Mergey, Anthony, and Soleil, Sylvain, 19–48. Paris: Société de législation comparée, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babusiaux, Ulrike Papinians Quaestiones: Zur rhetorischen Methode eines spätklassischen Juristen. Munich: Beck, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babusiaux, Ulrike “Rhetoric in Legal Writing: The Ethos and Pathos of the Roman Jurists.” In Bubb, and Peachin, (eds.), Medicine and the Law, 249–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Babusiaux, Ulrike “Zitate klassischer Juristen in den Reskripten der Soldatenkaiser.” In Babusiaux, and Kolb, (eds.), Das Recht der “Soldatenkaiser,” 238–69. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Babusiaux, Ulrike, and Kolb, Anne, eds. Das Recht der “Soldatenkaiser”: Rechtliche Stabilität in Zeiten politischen Umbruchs? Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Baharal, Drora. “The Emperor Macrinus: Imperial Propaganda and the Gens Aurelia.” In Gli Imperatori Severi, edited by Covolo, Enrico Dal and Rinaldi, Giancarlo, 47–65. Rome: LAS, 1999.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack. Living Originalism. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, Alessandro. The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Barnes, Timothy. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Barnes, Timothy “Three Imperial Edicts.” ZPE 21 (1976): 275–81.Google Scholar
Bartoli, Alfonso. “Riccordi di Elagabalo nella sede del Senato romano.” MPAA 27 (1951): 47–54.Google Scholar
Bartsch, Shadi. Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, Shadi Persius: A Study in Food, Philosophy, and the Figural. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard. Lawyers and Politics in the Early Roman Empire: A Study of Relations between the Roman Jurists and the Emperors from Augustus to Hadrian. Munich: Beck, 1989.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard Lawyers in Roman Transitional Politics: A Study of the Roman Jurists in Their Political Setting in the Late Republic and Triumvirate. Munich: Beck, 1985.Google Scholar
Bell, Catherine. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bell, Peter. Social Conflict in the Age of Justinian: Its Nature, Management, and Mediation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. Exile, Statelessness, and Migration: Playing Chess with History from Hannah Arendt to Isaiah Berlin. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Berdowski, Piotr. “Violence as an Interpretive Category in Cassius Dio: The Terror Under Sulla in 82 BCE.” In Lange, and Scott, (eds.), Impact of Violence, translated by Aleksander Nowacki, 15–45. Boston: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar
Berger, Adolf. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1991.Google Scholar
Bering-Staschewski, Rosemarie. Römische Zeitgeschichte bei Cassius Dio. Bochum: Studienverlag Brockmeyer, 1981.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Estelle. “Cassius Dio and the Roman Empire: The Impact of the Severan Wars on Dio’s Narrative.” In Lange, and Scott, (eds.), Impact of Violence, 120–37. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar
Bertrand-Dagenbach, Cécile. Alexandre Sévère et l’Histoire Auguste. Brussels: Éditions Latomus, 1990.Google Scholar
Besson, Arnaud. Constitutio Antoniniana: l’universalisation de la citoyenneté romaine au 3e siècle. Basel: Schwabe, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betancourt, Roland. Byzantine Intersectionality: Sexuality, Gender, and Race in the Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Beverley, Eric. “Frontier as Resource: Law, Crime, and Sovereignty on the Margins of Empire.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 55 (2013): 241–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bexley, Erica. “Saturnalian Lex: Seneca’s Apocolocyntosis.” In Ziogas, and Bexley, (eds.), Roman Law and Latin Literature, 45–66. London: Bloomsbury, 2022.Google Scholar
Bingham, Sandra, and Imrie, Alex. “The Prefect and the Plot: A Reassessment of the Murder of Plautianus.” JAH 3 (2015): 76–91.Google Scholar
Birley, Anthony. “Hadrian to the Antonines.” CAH2 11: 132–94.Google Scholar
Birley, Anthony “Hadrian’s Travels.” In The Representation and Perception of Roman Imperial Power, edited by de Blois, Lukas, Erdkamp, Paul, and Hekster, Olivier, 425–41. Amsterdam: Gieben, 2003.Google Scholar
Birley, Anthony “Marius Maximus: The Consular Biographer.” ANRW 2.34 (1997): 2678–2757.Google Scholar
Birley, Anthony Septimius Severus: The African Emperor. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
de Blois, Lukas. Image and Reality of Roman Imperial Power in the Third Century AD: The Impact of War. London: Routledge, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Blois, Lukas. “Roman Jurists and the Crisis of the Third Century A.D. in the Roman Empire.” In de Blois, (ed.), Administration, Prosopography and Appointment Policies, 136–53. Amsterdam: Gieben, 2001.Google Scholar
de Blois, Lukas. “The Constitutio Antoniniana (A.D. 212): Taxes or Religion?” Mnemosyne 67 (2014): 1014–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Blois, Lukas. “Why Did the Influence of Scholarly Jurists at the Roman Imperial Court Disappear After About A.D. 241?” In Babusiaux, and Kolb, (eds.), Das Recht Der “Soldatenkaiser,” 225–37. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
de Blois, Lukas, ed. Administration, Prosopography and Appointment Policies in the Roman Empire. Amsterdam: Gieben, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatwright, Mary. Hadrian and the Cities of the Roman Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatwright, Mary Hadrian and the City of Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böcking, Eduard, ed. Notitia dignitatum et administrationum omnium tam civilium quam militarium in partibus Orientis et Occidentis. Bonn: Marci, 1839.Google Scholar
Boissevain, Ursul, ed. Cassii Dionis Cocceiani Historiarum Romanarum quae supersunt. Berlin: Weidmann, 1955.Google Scholar
Bond, Sarah. Trade and Taboo: Disreputable Professions in the Roman Mediterranean. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, Barbara. Crisis and Ambition: Tombs and Burial Customs in Third-Century C.E. Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Borkowski, Andrew. Borkowski’s Textbook on Roman Law. Edited by du Plessis, Paul. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bowman, Alan. “Diocletian and the First Tetrarchy, A.D. 284–305.” CAH2 12: 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Keith. “Roman Slavery and Roman Law.” Historical Reflections 15 (1988): 477–95.Google Scholar
Brennan, Peter. “The Notitia Dignitatum.” In Les littératures techniques dans l’antiquité romaine: statut, public et destination, tradition, edited by Nicolet, Claude, 147–78. Vandœuvres: Fondation Hardt, 1996.Google Scholar
Brennan, Peter “The User’s Guide to the Notitia Dignitatum: The Case of the Dux Armeniae (ND Or. 38).” Antichthon 32 (1998): 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. Corey. The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. 2 vols. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bretone, Mario. Ius controversum nella giurisprudenza classica. Rome: Bardi, 2008.Google Scholar
Broise, Henri, and Thébert, Yvon. “Élagabal et le complexe religieux de la Vigna Barberini: Heliogabalium in Palatino monte iuxta aedes imperatorias consecravit eique templum fecit (HA, Ant. Heliog., III, 4).” MEFRA 111 (1999): 729–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Peter, and Gewirtz, Paul, eds. Law’s Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. The Making of Late Antiquity. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter The World of Late Antiquity, AD 150–750. New York: Harcourt, 1971.Google Scholar
Brundage, W. Fitzhugh. “The Long Shadow of Torture in the American South.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Literature of the U.S. South, edited by Hobson, Fred and Ladd, Barbara, 114–37. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Brunt, Peter. “The Administrators of Roman Egypt.” JRS 65 (1975): 124–47.Google Scholar
Brunt, Peter “Lex de Imperio Vespasiani.” JRS 67 (1977): 95–116.Google Scholar
Brutti, Massimo. Iulius Paulus: Decretorum libri tres. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2020.Google Scholar
Bruun, Christer. “Riflessioni sulla parte perduta della cd. Lex de Imperio Vespasiani.” In Capogrossi Colognesi, and Tassi Scandone, (eds.), La Lex, 23–45. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2009.Google Scholar
Bryen, Ari. “Judging Empire: Courts and Culture in Rome’s Eastern Provinces.” LHR 30 (2012): 771–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryen, Ari Violence in Roman Egypt: A Study in Legal Interpretation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryen, Ari “When Law Goes off the Rails: Or, Aggadah among the Iurisprudentes.” Critical Analysis of Law 3 (2016): 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryen, Ari, and Wypustek, Andrzej. “Gemellus’ Evil Eyes (P.Mich. VI 423–424).” GRBS 49 (2009): 535–55.Google Scholar
Bubb, Claire, and Peachin, Michael, eds. Medicine and the Law under the Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buraselis, Kostas. Θεῖα Δωρεά: das göttlich-kaiserliche Geschenk: Studien zur Politik der Severer und zur Constitutio Antoniniana. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgersdijk, Diederik, and Ross, Alan, eds. Imagining Emperors in the Later Roman Empire. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Peter. Exiles and Expatriates in the History of Knowledge, 1500–2000. Waltham: Brandeis University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burset, Christian. Empire of Laws: Legal Pluralism in British Colonial Policy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Bury, John. “The Notitia Dignitatum.” JRS 10 (1920): 131–54.Google Scholar
Butler, Orma. Studies in the Life of Heliogabalus. New York; London: Macmillan, 1908.Google Scholar
Butler, Shane, ed. Deep Classics: Rethinking Classical Reception. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016.Google Scholar
Calomino, Dario. “Caracalla and the Divine: Emperor Worship and Representation in the Visual Language of Roman Asia Minor.” AS 70 (2020): 153–79.Google Scholar
Cameron, Alan. The Last Pagans of Rome. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil. Procopius and the Sixth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Campanile, Domitilla, Carlà-Uhink, Filippo, and Facella, Margherita, eds. TransAntiquity: Cross-Dressing and Transgender Dynamics in the Ancient World. London: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Camurri, Renato. “The Exile Experience Reconsidered: A Comparative Perspective in European Cultural Migration during the Interwar Period.” Transatlantica 1 (2014). journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/6920Google Scholar
Cancelli, Filippo. La codificazione dell’edictum praetoris: dogma romanistico. Milan: Giuffrè, 2010.Google Scholar
Candy, Peter. “Judging beyond the Sandal: Law and Rhetoric in D. 19, 2, 31 (Alf. 5 Dig. a Paulo Epit.).” ZRG 138 (2021): 310–37.Google Scholar
Canepa, Matthew. “Emperor.” In Vidas, and Chin, (eds.), Late Ancient Knowing, 155–74. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Capogrossi, Colognesi, Luigi, and Scandone, Elena Tassi, eds. La Lex de Imperio Vespasiani e la Roma dei Flavi. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2009.Google Scholar
Carandini, Andrea, ed. The Atlas of Ancient Rome: Biography and Portraits of the City. Translated by Andrew Campbell Halavais. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Carbone, Lucia. Hidden Power: Late Cistophoric Production and the Organization of Provincia Asia 128–89 B.C. New York: The American Numismatic Society, 2020.Google Scholar
Carboni, Tiziana. La parola scritta al servizio dell’Imperatore e dell’Impero: l’ab epistulis e l’a libellis nel II secolo d. C. Bonn: Habelt, 2017.Google Scholar
Carlà-Uhink, Filippo. “‘Between the Human and the Divine’: Cross-Dressing and Transgender Dynamics in the Graeco-Roman World.” In Campanile, Carlà-Uhink, and Facella, (eds.), TransAntiquity, 3–37. London; New York: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlà-Uhink, Filippo “Quod Omni Consanguinitate Certius Est, Virtutibus Fratres: Families and Family Relationships in ‘Tetrarchic’ Ideology.” In Carlà-Uhink, and Rollinger, (eds.), The Tetrarchy as Ideology, 25–46. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlà-Uhink, Filippo, and Rollinger, Christian, eds. The Tetrarchy as Ideology: Reconfigurations and Representations of an Imperial Power. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, David. The Minority of Henry III. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Cascio, Elio lo. “The Age of the Severans.” CAH2 12: 137–55.Google Scholar
Cenderelli, Aldo. Ricerche sul codex Hermogenianus. Milan: Giuffrè, 1966.Google Scholar
Chaplin, Jane. Livy’s Exemplary History. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chastagnol, André. Histoire Auguste: les empereurs romains des IIe et IIIe siècles. 2nd ed. Paris: Laffont, 2014.Google Scholar
Chastagnol, André L’album municipal de Timgad. Bonn: Habelt, 1978.Google Scholar
Chastagnol, André “Un nouveau préfet du prétoire de Dioclétien: Aurelius Hermogenianus.” ZPE 78 (1989): 165–68.Google Scholar
Chatelain, Louis. “Fragments de Droit Antéjustinien.” RPh 23 (1899): 169–84.Google Scholar
Cheung, Caroline. “Born Roman between a Beet and a Cabbage.” AJP 142 (2021): 659–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitwood, Zachary. Byzantine Legal Culture and the Roman Legal Tradition, 867–1056. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoforou, Panayiotis. Imagining the Roman Emperor: Perceptions of Rulers in the High Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christol, Michel. “Entre la cité et l’empereur: Ulpien, Tyr et les empereurs de la dynastie sévérienne.” In Consuetudinis amor: Fragments d’histoire romaine (IIe-VIe siècles) offerts à Jean-Pierre Callu, edited by Chausson, François and Wolff, Étienne, 163–88. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2003.Google Scholar
Christol, Michel “Marius Maximus, Cassius Dio et Ulpien: destins croisés et débats politiques.” In Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures, edited by Fromentin, Valérie, Bertrand, Estelle, Coltelloni-Trannoy, Michèle, Molin, Michel, and Urso, Gianpaolo, 447–67. Bordeaux: Ausonius, 2016.Google Scholar
Chrysanthou, Chrysanthos. “Sex and Power in Cassius Dio’s Roman History: The Case of Elagabalus.” Mnemosyne 74 (2020): 598–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauss, James. “Allusion and Structure in Horace Satire 2.1: The Callimachean Response.” TAPA 115 (1985): 197–206.Google Scholar
Clemente, Guido. La Notitia Dignitatum. Cagliari: Fossataro, 1968.Google Scholar
Clemente, Guido “La notitia dignitatum: l’immagine e la realtà dell’impero tra IV e V secolo.” In Istituzioni, carismi ed esercizio del potere (IV–VI secolo d.C.), edited by Bonamente, Giorgio and Testa, Rita Lizzi, 117–32. Bari: Edipuglia, 2010.Google Scholar
Coleman, Kathleen. “Fatal Charades: Roman Executions Staged as Mythological Enactments.” JRS 80 (1990): 44–73.Google Scholar
Coleman, Kathleen “‘Informers’ on Parade.” In The Art of Ancient Spectacle, edited by Bergmann, Bettina and Kondoleon, Christine, 231–45. Washington (D.C.): National Gallery of Art, 1999.Google Scholar
Conlin, Diane. “Assemblages and Appropriation of Augustan Art and Topography in Flavian Rome.” In Domitian’s Rome and the Augustan Legacy, edited by Marks, Raymond and Mogetta, Marcello, 15–31. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Connolly, Joy. The Life of Roman Republicanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Connolly, Serena. Lives Behind the Laws: The World of the Codex Hermogenianus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constable, Marianne. Our Word Is Our Bond: How Legal Speech Acts. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alison. “From the Augustan Principate to the Invention of the Age of Augustus.” JRS 109 (2019): 71–87.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alison Res Gestae Diui Augusti. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Cooley, Alison The Senatus Consultum de Cn. Pisone Patre: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbo, Chiara. Constitutio Antoniniana: Ius philosophia religio. Naples: D’Auria, 2013.Google Scholar
Corcoran, Simon. “Hidden from History: The Legislation of Licinius.” In Harries, and Wood, (eds.), The Theodosian Code, 97–119. London: Duckworth, 1993.Google Scholar
Corcoran, Simon “Justinian and His Two Codes: Revisiting P. Oxy. 1814.” JJP 38 (2008): 73–111.Google Scholar
Corcoran, Simon “Roman Law and the Two Languages in Justinian’s Empire.” BICS 60 (2017): 96–116.Google Scholar
Corcoran, Simon The Empire of the Tetrarchs: Imperial Pronouncements and Government, AD 284–324. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, Simon “The Gregorianus and Hermogenianus Assembled and Shattered.” MEFRA 125 (2013): 285–304.Google Scholar
Coriat, Jean-Pierre. “La palingénésie des constitutions impériales: Histoire d’un projet et méthode pour le recueil de la législation du Principat.” MEFRA 101 (1989): 873–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coriat, Jean-Pierre “La technique du rescrit à la fin du principat.” SDHI 51 (1985): 319–48.Google Scholar
Coriat, Jean-Pierre “L’empereur juge et son tribunal à la fin du Principat: Un essai de synthèse.” In Haensch, (ed.), Recht haben und Recht bekommen, 41–61. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, 2016.Google Scholar
Coriat, Jean-Pierre Le prince législateur: La technique législative des Sévères et les méthodes de création du droit impérial à la fin du principat. Rome: École Française de Rome, 1997.Google Scholar
Coriat, Jean-Pierre Les constitutions des Sévères: Règne de Septime Sévère. Rome: École Française de Rome, 2014.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. “Nomos and Narrative.” Harvard Law Review 97 (1983): 4–68.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert “Violence and the Word.” Yale Law Journal 95 (1986): 1601–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, Eleanor. “Hopes and Aspirations: Res Publica, Leges et Iura, and Alternatives at Rome.” In Morrell, , Osgood, , and Welch, (eds.), The Alternative Augustan Age, 27–45. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Bridget. “Wills Formalities in the Twenty-First Century.” Wisconsin Law Review, 2019, 269–94.Google Scholar
Crawford, Michael. Roman Statutes. 2 vols. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 1996.Google Scholar
Crook, John. Consilium Principis: Imperial Councils and Counsellors from Augustus to Diocletian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Crook, John Legal Advocacy in the Roman World. Ithaca [NY]: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Crook, John “Women in Roman Succession.” In The Family in Ancient Rome: New Perspectives, edited by Rawson, Beryl, 50–82. Ithaca [NY]: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Graeme. “Law, Rhetoric, and Science: Historical Narratives in Roman Law.” Ph.D., University of Glasgow, 2018.Google Scholar
Curran, John. “‘Ius Vitae Necisque’: The Politics of Killing Children.” JAH 6 (2018): 111–35.Google Scholar
Czajkowski, Kimberley. Localized Law: The Babatha and Salome Komaise Archives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czajkowski, Kimberley “The Limits of Legal Pluralism in the Roman Empire.” JLH 40 (2019): 110–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czajkowski, Kimberley, and Eckhardt, Benedikt. “Law, Status and Agency in the Roman Provinces.” P&P 241 (2018): 3–31.Google Scholar
Daalder, Elsemieke. “‘Aequum Putavit Imperator’: Imperial Representation and Juristic Self-Fashioning in the Decreta and Imperiales Sententiae of Julius Paulus.” ZRG 139 (2022): 123–91.Google Scholar
Daalder, Elsemieke De rechtspraakverzamelingen van Julius Paulus: Recht en rechtvaardigheid in de rechterlijke uitspraken van keizer Septimius Severus. The Hague: Boom juridisch, 2018.Google Scholar
Daalder, Elsemieke “The ‘Decreta’ and ‘Imperiales Sententiae’ of Julius Paulus: Law and Justice in the Judicial Decisions of Septimius Severus.” In Hekster, and Verboven, (eds.), Impact of Justice, 49–67. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Daalder, Elsemieke “Tradition and Innovation in the Rescript Practice of the Emperor Caracalla.” In Tradition and Power in the Roman Empire, edited by Betjes, Sven, Hekster, Olivier, and Manders, Erika, 211–18. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2024.Google Scholar
Dagron, Gilbert. Emperor and Priest: The Imperial Office in Byzantium. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Dam, Raymond van. The Roman Revolution of Constantine. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Damaška, Mirjan. The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Damon, Cynthia. “Potior Utroque Vespasianus: Vespasian and His Predecessors in Tacitus’s Histories.” Arethusa 39 (2006): 245–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daube, David. “Princeps Legibus Solutus.” In Collected Studies in Roman Law, edited by Daube, David, Cohen, David, and Simon, Dieter, 549–51. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1991.Google Scholar
Daube, David “The Peregrine Praetor.” JRS 41 (1951): 66–70.Google Scholar
Daube, David “The Three Quotations from Homer in Digest 18. 1. 1. 1.” In Collected Studies in Roman Law, edited by Daube, David, Cohen, David, and Simon, Dieter, 341–43. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1991.Google Scholar
Davenport, Caillan. A History of the Roman Equestrian Order. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Davenport, Caillan “Cassius Dio and Caracalla.” CQ 62 (2012): 796–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Caillan, and Mallan, Christopher. “Hadrian’s Adoption Speech in Cassius Dio’s Roman History and the Problems of Imperial Succession.” AJP 135 (2014): 637–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Caillan, and Mallan, Christopher “Herodian and the Crisis of Emperorship, 235–238 AD.” Mnemosyne: 73 (2020): 419–40.Google Scholar
Davis, Kenneth Culp. “An Approach to Problems of Evidence in the Administrative Process.” Harvard Law Review 55 (1942): 364–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demougeot, Émilienne. “La Notitia dignitatum et l’histoire de l’Empire d’Occident au début du Ve siècle.” Latomus 34 (1975): 1079–1134.Google Scholar
Dench, Emma. Empire and Political Cultures in the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin, and Moyn, Samuel. “On the Domestication of Critical Legal History.” History and Theory 60 (2021): 296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dettenhofer, Maria. Herrschaft und Widerstand im augusteischen Principat: Die Konkurrenz zwischen res publica und domus Augusta. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2000.Google Scholar
Didion, Joan. “The White Album.” In The White Album, by Didion, Joan, 11–48. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. The Justice of Constantine: Law, Communication, and Control. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, Lucinda. “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” In Der christliche Orient und seine Umwelt, edited by Tubach, Jürgen, Vashalomidze, Sophia, and Greisiger, Lutz. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2007.Google Scholar
Dixon, Suzanne. “Infirmitas Sexus: Womanly Weakness in Roman Law.” TvR 52 (1984): 343–71.Google Scholar
Dolganov, Anna. “Law as Competitive Performance: Performative Aspects of the Legal Process in Roman Imperial Courts.” In Bubb, and Peachin, (eds.), Medicine and the Law, 66–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Dolganov, Anna “Reichsrecht and Volksrecht in Theory and Practice: Roman Justice in the Province of Egypt (P.Oxy. II 237, P.Oxy. IV 706, SB XII 10929).” Tyche 34 (2019): 27–60.Google Scholar
Doroszewska, Julia. “Between the Monstrous and the Divine: Hermaphrodites in Phlegon of Tralles’ Mirabilia.” AAntHung 53 (2013): 379–92.Google Scholar
Dreier, Horst. “Hans Kelsen (1881–1973): ‘Jurist des Jahrhunderts’?” In Deutsche Juristen jüdischer Herkunft, edited by Heinrichs, Helmut, Franzki, Harald, Schmalz, Klaus, and Stolleis, Michael, 705–32. Munich: Beck, 1993.Google Scholar
Drijvers, Jan Willem. “Jovian Between History and Myth.” In Burgersdijk, and Ross, (eds.), Imagining Emperors, 234–56. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, John. “Maximinus to Diocletian and the ‘Crisis.’” CAH2 12: 28–66.Google Scholar
Duggan, Charles. Twelfth-Century Decretal Collections and Their Importance in English History. London: Athlone Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Duxbury, Neil. The Nature and Authority of Precedent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. “Hard Cases.” Harvard Law Review 88 (1975): 1057–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald Law’s Empire. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberle, Lisa. “The Edicts of the Praetors: Law, Time, and Revolution in Ancient Rome.” LHR 42 (2024): 237–61.Google Scholar
Eck, Werner. “At Magnus Caesar, and Yet!: Social Resistance against Augustan Legislation.” In Morrell, , Osgood, , and Welch, (eds.), The Alternative Augustan Age, 78–95. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, Dan, and Straumann, Benjamin. “On the Liberties of the Ancients: Licentiousness, Equal Rights, and the Rule of Law.” History of European Ideas 49 (2023): 1037–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, P. T. Apocolocyntosis. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Edwards, Catharine. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eich, Armin, and Eich, Peter. “Thesen zur Genese des Verlautbarungsstils der spätantiken kaiserlichen Zentrale.” Tyche 19 (2004): 75–104.Google Scholar
Eichbauer, Melodie, and Brundage, James. Medieval Canon Law. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Jackie. Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enßlin, Wilhelm. Gottkaiser und Kaiser von Gottes Gnaden. Munich: Beck, 1943.Google Scholar
Ernst, Wolfgang. “Fritz Schulz (1879–1957).” In Jurists Uprooted: German-Speaking Emigré Lawyers in Twentieth Century Britain, edited by Beatson, Jack and Zimmermann, Reinhard, 105–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eshleman, Kendra. “Defining the Circle of Sophists: Philostratus and the Construction of the Second Sophistic.” CP 103 (2008): 395–413.Google Scholar
Evans-Grubbs, Judith. “Between Slavery and Freedom: Disputes over Status and the Codex Justinianus.” Roman Legal Tradition 9 (2013): 31–93.Google Scholar
Evans-Grubbs, Judith “Singles, Sex and Status in the Augustan Marriage Legislation.” In The Single Life in the Roman and Later Roman World, edited by Laes, Christian and Huebner, Sabine, 105–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Fantham, Elaine. Julia Augusti: The Emperor’s Daughter. London; New York: Routledge, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faro, Silvano. “Il questore imperiale: Luci ed ombre su natura e funzioni.” Κοινωνία 8 (1984): 133–59.Google Scholar
Faust, Stephan, and Leitmeir, Florian, eds. Repräsentationsformen in severischer Zeit. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Antike, 2011.Google Scholar
Fermi, Laura. Illustrious Immigrants: The Intellectual Migration from Europe, 1930–41. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Ferrary, Jean-Louis. “À propos des pouvoirs d’Auguste.” CCG 12 (2001): 101–54.Google Scholar
Ferrary, Jean-Louis, Marotta, Valerio, and Schiavone, Aldo. Ulpianus: Institutiones, de censibus. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2021.Google Scholar
Ferri, Rolando. “What the Text Wants to Say: Communicative Intention and Meaning in Late Antique Latin Exegesis of Literary Works and the Bible.” Incontri di filologia classica 16 (2017): 283–95.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter. The Mythology of Modern Law. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaig, Egon. Den Kaiser herausfordern: Die Ursurpation im römischen Reich. Frankfurt; New York: Campus, 1992.Google Scholar
Flory, Marleen. “Sic Exempla Parantur: Livia’s Shrine to Concordia and the Porticus Liviae.” Historia 33 (1984): 309–30.Google Scholar
Flower, Harriet. Roman Republics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Flower, Harriet The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Flower, Richard. “Visions of Constantine.” JRS 102 (2012): 287–305.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect.” Oxford Review 5 (1967): 5–15.Google Scholar
Ford, Lisa. Settler Sovereignty: Jurisdiction and Indigenous People in America and Australia, 1788–1836. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frakes, Robert. Compiling the Collatio Legum Mosaicarum et Romanarum in Late Antiquity. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Francisci, Pietro de. “Frammento di un indice del primo Codice Giustinianeo.” Aegyptus 3 (1922): 68–79.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, David. “Fetus Magic and Sorcery Fears in Roman Egypt.” GRBS 46 (2006): 37–62.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, Kirk. Horace, Satires: Book II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, Kirk “Horatius Anceps: Persona and Self-Revelation in Satire and Song.” In A Companion to Horace, edited by Davis, Gregson, 271–90. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, Kirk Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Martin. Untersuchungen zur Religion und zur Religionspolitik des Kaisers Elagabal. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar
Frier, Bruce. “Juristic Literature and the Law: Competition and Cooperation.” In Bubb, and Peachin, (eds.), Medicine and the Law, 177–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Frier, Bruce The Rise of the Roman Jurists: Studies in Cicero’s Pro Caecina. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frier, Bruce et al., eds. The Codex of Justinian: A New Annotated Translation, with Parallel Latin and Greek Text Based on a Translation by Justice Fred H. Blume. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon. “Consideration and Form.” Columbia Law Review 41 (1941): 799–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Gagarin, Michael. Writing Greek Law. Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, Karl. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Gallo, Filippo. “Ars boni et aequi e ius naturale.” SDHI 75 (2009): 15–42.Google Scholar
Gallo, Filippo “Diritto e giustizia nel titolo primo del Digesto.” SDHI 54 (1988): 1–36.Google Scholar
Gamauf, Richard. “Die Kritik am römischen Recht im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert.” Orbis Iuris Romani 2 (1996): 33–61.Google Scholar
Gardner, Jane. “Gender-Role Assumptions in Roman Law.” EMC 39 (1995): 377–400.Google Scholar
Garrido, Jacobo Rodríguez. “The Curious Case of Aurelius Papia: Slavery, Legislation and Causae Liberales in the Times of Severus Alexander.” Historia 72 (2023): 343–69.Google Scholar
Gauthier, Philippe. Les cités grecques et leurs bienfaiteurs (IVe–Ier siècle avant J.C.): Contribution à l’histoire des institutions. Paris: De Boccard, 1985.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, Ulrich. Sermo Iuris: Rechtssprache und Recht in der augusteischen Dichtung. Leiden: Brill, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelbach, Jonah. “The Dynamic Dilemma: Dynamics and Disuniformity in Statutory Interpretation.” In Research Handbook on Law and Time, edited by Fagan, Frank and Levmore, Saul, 1–53. Northampton [MA]; Cheltenham and Camberley: Elgar, 2025.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Translated by Jane Lewin. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Marie-Amélie. Family Matters: Queer Households and the Half-Century Struggle for Legal Recognition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getzler, Joshua. “Citation and the Authority of Opinions in Roman and Jewish Law: The Snake Oven Revisited.” In Inter Cives Necnon Peregrinos: Essays in Honour of Boudewijn Sirks, edited by Hallebeek, Jan, 289–308. Göttingen: V und R Unipress, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geue, Tom. Author Unknown: The Power of Anonymity in Ancient Rome. Cambridge [MA]; London: Harvard University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Geus, Klaus, and King, Colin. “Paradoxography.” In Oxford Handbook of Science and Medicine in the Classical World, edited by Keyser, Paul and Scarborough, John, 431–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Edward. Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. New York: Everyman, 1993.Google Scholar
Gibson, Bruce. “Contemporary Contexts.” In Roche, (ed.), Pliny’s Praise, 104–24. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Gibson, Bruce “Unending Praise: Pliny and Ending Panegyric.” In Form and Function in Roman Oratory, edited by Berry, Dominic and Erskine, Andrew, 122–36. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Giltaij, Jacob. “Reinventing the Principles of Roman Law.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY, April 24, 2019. papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3377309.Google Scholar
Giovanni, Lucio de. “Il principe e la legge: Dalla Lex de Imperio Vespasiani al mondo tardoantico.” In Colognesi, Capogrossi and Scandone, Tassi (eds.), La Lex, 219–30. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2009.Google Scholar
Gleason, Maud. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Goh, Ian. “It All Comes Out: Vomit as a Source of Comedy in Roman Moralizing Texts.” ICS 43 (2018): 438–58.Google Scholar
González, Julián. “Un nuevo fragmento de la Tabula Hebana.” AEA 73 (2000): 253–57.Google Scholar
González, Julián, and Crawford, Michael. “The Lex Irnitana: A New Copy of the Flavian Municipal Law.” JRS 76 (1986): 147–243.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert. “Critical Legal Histories.” Stanford Law Review 36 (1984): 57–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, Emily. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowing, Alain. The Triumviral Narratives of Appian and Cassius Dio. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Gradenwitz, Otto. Interpolationen in den Pandekten: Kritische studien. Berlin: Weidmann, 1887.Google Scholar
Griffin, Miriam. “The Flavians.” CAH2 11: 1–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, John. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 24 (1986): 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Ariela. What Blood Won’t Tell: A History of Race on Trial in America. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grugel, Jean, and Peruzzotti, Enrique. “The Domestic Politics of International Human Rights Law: Implementing the Convention on the Rights of the Child in Ecuador, Chile, and Argentina.” Human Rights Quarterly 34 (2012): 178–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gualandi, Giovanni. Legislazione imperiale e giurisprudenza. 2nd ed. Milan: Giuffrè, 2012.Google Scholar
Guarino, Antonio. “La leggenda sulla codificazione dell’editto e la sua genesi.” In Pagine di diritto romano, by Guarino, Antonio, 253–66. Naples: Jovene, 1994.Google Scholar
Guarino, Antonio “Sul legato di vesti.” Labeo 16 (1970): 58–60.Google Scholar
Gulina, Giovanni. “La cognizione straordinaria del princeps nei casi di C. Tettio e dei fratelli Tracali (Val. Max. 7.7.3–4).” Iuris antiqui historia 9 (2017): 41–73.Google Scholar
Haarer, Fiona. Justinian: Empire and Society in the Sixth Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Habinek, Thomas, and Schiesaro, Alessandro, eds. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society, 1997.Google Scholar
Haensch, Rudolf, ed. Recht haben und Recht bekommen im Imperium Romanum: das Gerichtswesen der römischen Kaiserzeit und seine dokumentarische Evidenz. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, 2016.Google Scholar
Hall, Linda. Roman Berytus: Beirut in Late Antiquity. London; New York: Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, Jill. Cicero and the Jurists: From Citizens’ Law to the Lawful State. London: Duckworth, 2006.Google Scholar
Harries, Jill “Iurisperiti: ‘Men Skilled in Law.’” In Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture, edited by Woolf, Greg and König, Jason, 83–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, Jill Law and Crime in the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, Jill Law and Empire in Late Antiquity. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, Jill “Legal Education and Training of Lawyers.” In du Plessis, , Ando, , and Tuori, (eds.), Roman Law and Society, 151–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Harries, Jill “Sacra Generalitas: The Administrative Background to the Theodosian Code.” In Estudios de historia del derecho europeo: Homenaje al P. G. Martínez Díez, edited by Calvo, María Dolores Gutiérrez and Pérez-Bustamante, Rogelio, 31–42. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1994.Google Scholar
Harries, Jill “The Roman Imperial Quaestor from Constantine to Theodosius II.” JRS 78 (1988): 148–72.Google Scholar
Harries, Jill, and Wood, Ian, eds. The Theodosian Code: Studies in the Imperial Law of Late Antiquity. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Harris, William. “A Roman Father’s Power of Life and Death.” In Studies in Roman Law in Memory of A. Arthur Schiller, edited by Bagnall, Roger and Harris, William, 81–95. Leiden: Brill, 1986.Google Scholar
Harrison, Geoffrey. “The Confessions of Lucilius (Horace ‘Sat.’ 2.1.30–34): A Defense of Autobiographical Satire?” ClAnt 6 (1987): 38–52.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. “Pigs and Positivism.” Wisconsin Law Review 1985.4 (1985): 899–936.Google Scholar
Hauken, Tor. Petition and Response: An Epigraphic Study of Petitions to Roman Emperors 181–249. Athens: The Norwegian Institute at Athens, 1998.Google Scholar
Haynes, Holly. The History of Make-Believe: Tacitus on Imperial Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Hedrick, Charles. History and Silence: Purge and Rehabilitation of Memory in Late Antiquity. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Hekster, Olivier. “All in the Family: The Appointment of Emperors Designate in the Second Century A.D.” In de Blois, (ed.), Administration, Prosopography and Appointment Policies, 35–49. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Hekster, Olivier Commodus: An Emperor at the Crossroads. Amsterdam: Gieben, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekster, Olivier Emperors and Ancestors: Roman Rulers and the Constraints of Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekster, Olivier “Imperial Justice?: The Absence of Images of Roman Emperors in a Legal Role.” CQ 70 (2020): 247–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekster, Olivier, and Kaizer, Ted. “An Accidental Tourist?: Caracalla’s Fatal Trip to the Temple of the Moon at Carrhae/Harran.” AS 42 (2012): 89–107.Google Scholar
Hekster, Olivier, and Zair, Nicholas. Rome and its Empire, AD 193–284. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekster, Olivier, and Verboven, Koenraad, eds. The Impact of Justice on the Roman Empire. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellström, Monica. “The Monumental Bureaucracy of Diocletian.” In Carlà-Uhink, and Rollinger, (eds.), The Tetrarchy as Ideology, 141–60. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2023.Google Scholar
Herz, Zachary. “How to Do the History of Elagabalus.” In The Routledge Handbook of Classics and Queer Theory, edited by Haselswerdt, Ella, Lindheim, Sara, and Ormand, Kirk, 408–22. Oxford; New York: Routledge, 2023.Google Scholar
Herz, Zachary “Precedential Reasoning and Dynastic Self-Fashioning in the Rescripts of Severus Alexander.” Historia 69 (2020): 103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, Zachary “The Epistemology of the Courthouse: Classical Antiquity in American LGBT-Rights Litigation.” In Enticements: Queer Legal Studies, edited by Fischel, Joseph and Cossman, Brenda, 29–58. New York: NYU Press, 2024.Google Scholar
Heyam, Kit. Before We Were Trans: A New History of Gender. New York: Seal Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Hirschfield, Paul. “Exceptionally Lethal: American Police Killings in a Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Criminology 6 (2023): 471–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoët-Van Cauwenberghe, Christine. “Marius Maximus, gouverneur de la Gaule Belgique, haut fonctionnaire et historien.” RdN 101 (2019): 243–62.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. Emergency Politics: Paradox, Law, Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Honoré, Anthony. Emperors and Lawyers: With a Palingenesia of Third-Century Imperial Rescripts, 193–305 A.D. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honoré, Anthony Gaius. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Honoré, Anthony Justinian’s Digest: Character and Compilation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honoré, Anthony Law in the Crisis of Empire, 379–455 AD: The Theodosian Dynasty and Its Quaestors with a Palingenesia of Laws of the Dynasty. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honoré, Anthony “The Severan Lawyers: A Preliminary Survey.” SDHI 28 (1962): 162–232.Google Scholar
Honoré, Anthony Tribonian. Ithaca [NY]: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Honoré, Anthony Ulpian: Pioneer of Human Rights. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, Brad. Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Horak, Franz. Rationes decidendi: Entscheidungsbegründungen bei den älteren römischen Juristen bis Labeo. Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1969.Google Scholar
Hornblower, Simon, and Matthews, Elaine. Greek Personal Names: Their Value as Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton. “The Rule of Law: An Unqualified Human Good?” Yale Law Journal 86 (1977): 561–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hose, Martin. “Historiographie in der Krise: Herausforderungen und Lösungen der Geschichtsschreibung im dritten Jahrhundert n. Chr.” In Empire in Crisis: Gothic Invasions and Roman Historiography, edited by Mitthof, Fritz, Martin, Gunther, and Grusková, Jana, 35–49. Vienna: Holzhausen, 2020.Google Scholar
Huck, Olivier. “Les compilateurs au travail: dessein et méthode de la codification théodosienne.” In Société, économie, administration dans le Code Théodosien, edited by Crogiez-Pétrequin, Sylvie and Jaillette, Pierre, 79–98. Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humfress, Caroline. “Law and Legal Practice in the Age of Justinian.” In Maas, (ed.), Age of Justinian, 161–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Humfress, Caroline “Legal Pluralism’s Other: Mythologizing Modern Law.” LHR 42 (2024): 155–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humfress, Caroline Orthodoxy and the Courts in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humfress, Caroline “Thinking through Legal Pluralism: ‘Forum Shopping’ in the Later Roman Empire.” In Law and Empire, edited by Duindam, Jeroen, Harries, Jill, Humfress, Caroline, and Hurvitz, Nimrod, 223–50. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Hunink, Vincent. Tertullian: De Pallio. Amsterdam: Gieben, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlet, Frédéric. “La Lex de imperio Vespasiani et la légitimité augustéenne.” Latomus 52 (1993): 261–80.Google Scholar
Hurlet, Frédéric “Les origines de la jurisdiction impériale: Imperator Caesar Augustus iudex.” In Haensch, (ed.), Recht haben und Recht bekommen, 5–39. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, 2016.Google Scholar
Hurlet, Frédéric “L’idéologie dynastique sous les Julio-Claudiens: Origines, évolution, modes d’expression et modalités de sa diffusion dans les provinces.” In L’Augusteum de Narona, edited by Zecchini, Giuseppe, 117–43. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2015.Google Scholar
Huschke, Philipp. “Über den Gregorianus und Hermogenianus Codex.” ZR 6 (1867): 279–331.Google Scholar
Icks, Martijn. “From Priest to Emperor to Priest-Emperor: The Failed Legitimation of Elagabalus.” In Private and Public Lies: The Discourse of Deception and Deceit in the Graeco-Roman World, edited by Turner, Andrew, Chong-Gossard, James, and Vervaet, Frederik, 329–41. Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Icks, Martijn The Crimes of Elagabalus: The Life and Legacy of Rome’s Decadent Boy Emperor. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Imrie, Alex. The Antonine Constitution: An Edict for the Caracallan Empire. Boston: Brill, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, Doreen. “The Panegyricus and Rhetorical Theory.” In Roche, (ed.), Pliny’s Praise, 67–84. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isager, Jacob. “Vespasiano e Augusto.” In Studia Romana in Honorem P. Krarup Septuagenarii, edited by Ascani, K., et al., 64–71. Odense: Odense University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Jackson, Claire. “Dio Chrysostom.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic, edited by Richter, Daniel and Johnson, William, 217–32. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Andrew. “‘Papinian Commands One Thing, Our Paul Another’: Roman Christians and Jewish Law in the Collatio Legum Mosaicarum et Romanarum.” In Religion and Law in Classical and Christian Rome, edited by Ando, Clifford, et al., 85–99. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2006.Google Scholar
Jasper, Detlev, and Fuhrmann, Horst. Papal Letters in the Early Middle Ages. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Jensen, Laura. “Government, the State, and Governance.” Polity 40 (2008): 379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, David. “Justinian’s Digest: The Interpretation of Interpolation.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1989): 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, David Roman Law in Context. 2nd ed. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, David “Three Thoughts on Roman Private Law and the Lex Irnitana.” JRS 77 (1987): 62–77.Google Scholar
Jolowicz, Herbert, and Nicholas, John. Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Jones, Arnold. The Later Roman Empire, 284–602. 3 vols. Oxford: B. Blackwell, 1964.Google Scholar
Jones, Brian. The Emperor Titus. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Jones, Brian, and Milns, Robert. Suetonius: The Flavian Emperors: A Historical Commentary. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. Legal Realism at Yale, 1927–1960. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Kampen, Natalie. Family Fictions in Roman Art. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. 3rd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kapust, Daniel. Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaser, Max. “Zur Glaubwürdigkeit der römischen Rechtsquellen (Über die Grenzen der Interpolationenkritik).” In Paradisi, (ed.), La critica del testo, 291–370. Florence: Olschki, 1971.Google Scholar
Kaser, Max Zur Methodologie der römischen Rechtsquellenforschung. Vienna: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger, 1972.Google Scholar
Kaser, Max, and Hackl, Karl. Das römische Zivilprozessrecht. 2nd ed. Munich: Beck, 1996.Google Scholar
Katzoff, Ranon. “On the Intended Use of P. Col. 123.” In Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Papyrology, edited by Bagnall, Roger, 559–73. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Katzoff, Ranon “Precedents in the Courts of Roman Egypt.” ZRG 89 (1972): 256–92.Google Scholar
Kearley, Timothy, and Kroll, Wilhelm. A History of Justinian’s Novels: With an English Translation of Wilhelm Kroll’s Latin Preface. Translated by David Miller. Fort Collins: Veterrimus Publishing, 2020.Google Scholar
Kehoe, Dennis. Law And the Rural Economy in the Roman Empire. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Benjamin. Petitions, Litigation, and Social Control in Roman Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Christopher. Ruling the Later Roman Empire. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Kemezis, Adam. “Augustus the Ironic Paradigm: Cassius Dio’s Portrayal of the Lex Julia and Lex Papia Poppaea.” Phoenix 61 (2007): 270–85.Google Scholar
Kemezis, Adam “Cassius Dio and Senatorial Memory of Civil War in the 190s.” In Lange, and Scott, (eds.), Impact of Violence, 257–86. Boston: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar
Kemezis, Adam Greek Narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans: Cassius Dio, Philostratus and Herodian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemezis, Adam “The Fall of Elagabalus as Literary Narrative and Political Reality.” Historia 65 (2016): 348–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemezis, Adam “Vox Populi, Vox Mea?: Information, Evaluation, and Public Opinion in Dio’s Account of the Principate.” In Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio’s Roman History, edited by Davenport, Caillan and Mallan, Christopher, 33–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmers, Fleur. “Out of the Shadow: Geta and Caracalla Reconsidered.” In Faust, and Leitmeir, (eds.), Repräsentationsformen in Severischer Zeit, 270–90. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Antike, 2011.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. A Critique of Adjudication: Fin de Siècle. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kikuchi, Shigeto. “Authority at a Distance: Popes, Their Media, and Their Presence Felt in the Frankish Kingdom.” In Communicating Papal Authority in the Middle Ages, edited by Ozawa, Minoru, Smith, Thomas, and Strack, Georg, 13–30. London; New York: Routledge, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kmak, Magdalena. “The Impact of Exile on Law and Legal Science 1934-1964.” In Roman Law and The Idea of Europe, edited by Tuori, Kaius and Björklund, Heta, 15–34. London: T. and T. Clark, 2018.Google Scholar
Kohlhepp, Ralf. “Franz Wieacker und die NS-Zeit.” ZRG 122 (2005): 203–23.Google Scholar
Kondratuk, Laurent. “Le travestissement dans les droits romain et judéo-chrétien.” In Genre, famille, vulnérabilité: Mélanges en l’honneur de Catherine Philippe, edited by Dorsman, Anne, Kondratuk, Laurent, and Lapérou-Scheneider, Béatrice, 51–64. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2017.Google Scholar
Köstner, Elena. “Geschlechterrollen im römischen Erbrecht im Spiegel des zeitgenössischen Gerechtigkeitsverständnisses und am Beispiel der lex Voconia.” In Hekster, and Verboven, (eds.), Impact of Justice, 177–95. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Kraus, Christina, and Woodman, Anthony. Latin Historians. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Krüger, Paul. “Über die Verwendung von Papyrus und Pergament für die juristische Litteratur der Römer.” ZRG 8 (1887): 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, Paul, Birks, Peter, and McLeod, Grant, eds. Justinian’s Institutes. Ithaca [NY]: Cornell University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Krüpe, Florian. Die damnatio memoriae: über die Vernichtung von Erinnerung: eine Fallstudie zu Publius Septimius Geta (189–211 n.Chr.). Gutenberg: Computus Druck Satz und Verlag, 2011.Google Scholar
Krüpe, Florian “Die damnatio memoriae von Plautianus und Plautilla: Zerstörte Familie, zerstörte Erinnerungen.” In BilderGewalt: Zerstörung, Zensur, Umkodierung, Neuschöpfung, edited by Münch, Birgit and Tacke, Andreas, 15–26. Petersberg: Imhof, 2018.Google Scholar
Kulikowski, Michael. “Ordo.” In Vidas, and Chin, (eds.), Late Ancient Knowing, 175–96. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Kulikowski, Michael “The ‘Notitia Dignitatum’ as a Historical Source.” Historia 49 (2000): 358–77.Google Scholar
Kunkel, Wolfgang. “Das Wesen des ius respondendi.” ZRG 66 (1948): 423–57.Google Scholar
Kunkel, Wolfgang “Der Prozess der Gohariener vor Caracalla.” In Festschrift für Hans Lewald, 81–91. Basel: Helbig & Lichtenhahn, 1953.Google Scholar
Kunkel, Wolfgang Die römischen Juristen: Herkunft und soziale Stellung. 2nd ed. Cologne; Vienna: Böhlau, 2001.Google Scholar
Kunkel, Wolfgang “Über Lebenszeit und Laufbahn des Juristen Julians.” Iura 1 (1950): 192–203.Google Scholar
Künzer, Isabelle. Kulturen der Konkurrenz: Untersuchungen zu einem senatorischen Interaktionsmodus an der Wende vom ersten zum zweiten Jahrhundert n. Chr. Bonn: Habelt, 2016.Google Scholar
Ladavac, Nicoletta. “Philosophy of Law and Theory of Law: The Continuity of Kelsen’s Years in America.” In Hans Kelsen in America: Selective Affinities and the Mysteries of Academic Influence, edited by Telman, D. A. Jeremy, 229–47. New York: Springer, 2016.Google Scholar
LaFleur, Richard. “Horace and Onomasti Komodein: The Law of Satire.” ANRW 2.3 (1981): 1790–1826.Google Scholar
Langbein, John. “Substantial Compliance with the Wills Act.” Harvard Law Review 88 (1975): 489–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Carsten. “Cassius Dio on Perusia: A Study in Human Nature During Civil War.” In Madsen, and Lange, (eds.), Cassius Dio the Historian, 336–62. Boston: Brill, 2021.Google Scholar
Lange, Carsten “The Battle of Actium: A Reconsideration.” CQ 61 (2011): 608–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Carsten, and Scott, Andrew, eds. Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Boston: Brill, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Carsten, and Madsen, Jesper, eds. Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Langford, Julie. “Cassius Dio and the Dowager Empresses, Part 1: Livia, the Senate, and the Succession Struggle.” In Madsen, and Lange, (eds.), Cassius Dio the Historian, 426–57. Boston: Brill, 2021.Google Scholar
Langford, Julie Maternal Megalomania: Julia Domna and the Imperial Politics of Motherhood. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, Rebecca. Exemplary Ethics in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, Rebecca “Roman Exemplarity: Mediating between General and Particular.” In Lowrie, and Lüdemann, (eds.), Exemplarity and Singularity, 68–80. London; New York: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Lanni, Adriaan. Law and Justice in the Courts of Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Atria, and Sisson, Keith. “Papal Decretals.” In A Companion to the Medieval Papacy, edited by Larson, Atria and Sisson, Keith, 158–73. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehne-Gstreinthaler, Christine. Iurisperiti et oratores: eine Studie zu den römischen Juristen der Republik. Vienna: Böhlau Verlag, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lendon, Jon. Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lendon, Jon “The Legitimacy of the Roman Emperor: Against Weberian Legitimacy and Imperial ‘Strategies of Legitimation.’” In Herrschaftsstrukturen Und Herrschaftspraxis, edited by Kolb, Anne, 53–63. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenel, Otto. “Interpolationenjagd.” ZRG 45 (1925): 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenel, Otto Palingenesia iuris civilis. 2nd ed. Graz: Akademische Druck-Universität Verlagsanstalt, 1960.Google Scholar
Lenski, Noel. Constantine and the Cities: Imperial Authority and Civic Politics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenski, Noel, and Cameron, Catherine, eds. What Is a Slave Society?: The Practice of Slavery in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Melvin, and Simmons, Carolyn. “Observer’s Reaction to the ‘Innocent Victim’: Compassion or Rejection?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4 (1966): 203–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Letteney, Mark. The Christianization of Knowledge in Late Antiquity: Intellectual and Material Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levick, Barbara. Augustus: Image and Substance. London: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Levick, Barbara “The Lex de Imperio Vespasiani: The Parts and the Whole.” In Capogrossi, Colognesi, and Tassi, Scandone, (eds.), La Lex, 11–22. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2009.Google Scholar
Levick, Barbara Vespasian. New York: Routledge, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, and Balkin, Jack. “Morton Horwitz Wrestles with the Rule of Law.” In Transformations in American Legal History, edited by Hamilton, Daniel and Brophy, Alfred, 1–22. Cambridge [MA]: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Levy, Ernst. “Von den römischen Anklägervergehen.” In Gesammelte Schriften, by Levy, Ernst, 379–432. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 1967.Google Scholar
Lewis, Andrew. “Slavery, Family, and Status.” In The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law, edited by Johnston, David, 151–74. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Licandro, Orazio. “Pauli Sententiae: storia controversa di un testo illustre tra autenticità, apocrifia e appunti di scuola.” SDHI 84 (2018): 355–66.Google Scholar
Licandro, Orazio, and Palazzolo, Nicola. Papirius Iustus: Libri XX de constitutionibus. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2021.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, John. Antioch: City and Imperial Administration in the Later Roman Empire. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Liebs, Detlef. Die Jurisprudenz im spätantiken Italien (260–640 n. Chr.). Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebs, Detlef Hermogenians Iuris epitome: Zum Stand der römischen Jurisprudenz im Zeitalter Diokletians. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1964.Google Scholar
Liebs, Detlef Hofjuristen der römischen Kaiser bis Justinian. Munich: Beck, 2011.Google Scholar
Liebs, Detlef “Jurisprudenz.” In Die Literatur des Umbruchs, edited by Sallmann, Klaus, 4: 83–217. Munich: Beck, 1997.Google Scholar
Liebs, Detlef “Rechtsschulen und Rechtsunterricht im Prinzipat.” ANRW 2.15 (1976): 197–286.Google Scholar
Liebs, Detlef Römische Jurisprudenz in Gallien (2. Bis 8. Jahrhundert). Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebs, Detlef “The Code System: Reorganizing Roman Law and Legal Literature in the Late Antique Period.” In Nasti, and Schiavone, (eds.), Jurists and Legal Science, 261–85. London: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Lindholmer, Mads. “Exploiting Conventions: Cassius Dio’s Late Republic and the Annalistic Tradition.” In Madsen, and Lange, (eds.), Cassius Dio the Historian, 336–62. Boston: Brill, 2021.Google Scholar
Lobur, John. Consensus, Concordia and the Formation of Roman Imperial Ideology. New York; Abingdon: Routledge, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lokin, Jan. “The End of an Epoch: Epilegomena to a Century of Interpolation Criticism.” In Collatio iuris romani: Études dédiées à Hans Ankum a l’occasion de son 65 anniversaire, edited by Feenstra, Robert, 261–73. Amsterdam: Gieben, 1995.Google Scholar
Lokin, Jan “The Novels of Leo and the Decisions of Justinian.” In Analecta Atheniensia Ad Ius Byzantinum Spectantia, edited by Troianos, Spyros, 131–40. Athens: Sakkoulas Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
Lowrie, Michèle. “Roman Law and Latin Literature.” In du Plessis, , Ando, , and Tuori, (eds.), Roman Law and Society, 70–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Lowrie, Michèle “Slander and Horse Law in Horace, Sermones 2.1.” Law & Literature 17 (2005): 405–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, Michèle “The Force of Literature.” In Ziogas, and Bexley, (eds.), Roman Law and Latin Literature, 25–44. London: Bloomsbury, 2022.Google Scholar
Lowrie, Michèle Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, Michèle, and Lüdemann, Susanne, eds. Exemplarity and Singularity: Thinking through Particulars in Philosophy, Literature, and Law. London; New York: Routledge, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucrezi, Francesco. Aspetti giuridici del principato di Vespasiano. Naples: Jovene, 1995.Google Scholar
Lucrezi, Francesco “Il mito della Lex de Imperio Vespasiani.” In Capogrossi, Colognesi, and Tassi, Scandone, (eds.), La Lex, 157–68. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2009.Google Scholar
Lucrezi, Francesco Leges super principem: La monarchia costituzionale di Vespasiano. Naples: Jovene, 1982.Google Scholar
Lucrezi, Francesco, and Rocca, Samuele. Studi sulla Collatio: Il deposito in diritto ebraico e romano. Turin: Giappichelli, 2017.Google Scholar
Lusnia, Susann. Creating Severan Rome. Brussels: Éditions Latomus, 2014.Google Scholar
John, Ma. Antiochos III and the Cities of Western Asia Minor. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Maas, Michael. “Roman History and Christian Ideology in Justinian Reform Legislation.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 40 (1986): 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, Michael, ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Justinian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMullen, Ramsay. “Judicial Savagery in the Roman Empire.” Chiron 16 (1986): 147–66.Google Scholar
MacMullen, Ramsay Roman Government’s Response to Crisis, A.D. 235–337. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Madsen, Jesper, and Lange, Carsten, eds. Cassius Dio the Historian: Methods and Approaches. Boston: Brill, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maehle, Ingvar. “Munificence in the Democratic and Oligarchic Systems of the Ancient World: A Comparative Approach.” In Institution of Sponsorship from Ancient to Modern Times, edited by Kakavas, Georgios, 13–27. Athens: Norwegian Institute at Athens, 2019.Google Scholar
Magioncalda, Andreina. “Un giurista al servizio dell’imperatore: La carriera di Emilio Papiniano.” Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica 30 (2000): 451–78.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results.” European Journal of Sociology 25 (1984): 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantovani, Dario. Digesto e masse bluhmiane. Milan: Giuffrè, 1987.Google Scholar
Mantovani, Dario “‘Leges et iura p(opuli) r(omani) restituit’: principe e diritto in un aureo di Ottaviano.” In I tribunali dell’Impero, edited by Milazzo, Francesco, 41–105. Milan: Giuffrè, 2008.Google Scholar
Mantovani, Dario “Les clauses ‘sans précédents’ de la lex de imperio Vespasiani: Une interprétation uuridique.” CCG 16 (2005): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantovani, Dario Les juristes écrivains de la Rome antique: Les œuvres des juristes comme littérature. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantovani, Dario “Lex Regia de Imperio Vespasiani: Il vagum imperium e la legge constante.” In Colognesi, Capogrossi and Scandone, Tassi (eds.), La Lex, 125–55. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2009.Google Scholar
Mantovani, Dario, and Padoa, Antonio Schioppa, , eds. Interpretare il Digesto: Storia e metodi. Pavia: IUSS Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Manuwald, Bernd. Cassius Dio und Augustus: Philologische Untersuchungen zu den Büchern 45–56 des dionischen Geschichtswerkes. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1979.Google Scholar
Martini, Remo. “Ancora sul legato di vesti.” Labeo 17 (1971): 157–68.Google Scholar
Martini, Rodolfo. “Note in calce ad una falsa emissione aurea di Octavianus recentemente apparsa sul mercato antiquario.” Annotazioni Numismatische 5 (1992): 94–95.Google Scholar
Martini, Rodolfo “Nuova nota a conferma della falsifità dell ‘aureo’ di Octavianus.” Annotazioni Numismatische 21 (1996): 465–67.Google Scholar
Mason, Hugh. Greek Terms for Roman Institutions: A Lexicon and Analysis. Toronto: Hakkert, 1974.Google Scholar
Massei, Massimo. “Le citazioni della giurisprudenza classica nella legislazione imperiale.” In Scritti di diritto romano in onore di Contardo Ferrini, 403–75. Milan: University of Pavia, 1946.Google Scholar
Matern, Petra. Helios und Sol: Kulte und Ikonographie des griechischen und römischen Sonnengottes. Istanbul: Ege Yayınları, 2002.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari. “Looking to the Bottom: Critical Legal Studies and Reparations.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 22 (1987): 323–400.Google Scholar
Matthews, John. Laying Down the Law: A Study of the Theodosian Code. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Mazurek, Lindsey. Isis in a Global Empire: Greek Identity Through Egyptian Religion in Roman Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Kathleen. Slaves, Masters, and the Art of Authority in Plautine Comedy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
McEvoy, Meaghan. Child Emperor Rule in the Late Roman West, A.D. 367–455. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, Thomas. “Satire and the Law: The Case of Horace.” CCJ 47 (2001): 81–102.Google Scholar
McGinn, Thomas “The Sea Common to All in Plautus, Rudens: Social Norms and Legal Rules.” In Ziogas, and Bexley, (eds.), Roman Law and Latin Literature, 169–88. London: Bloomsbury, 2022.Google Scholar
McSweeney, Thomas. Priests of the Law: Roman Law and the Making of the Common Law’s First Professionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Mischa. Das andere Zeitalter Justinians: Kontingenzerfahrung und Kontingenzbewältigung im 6. Jahrhundert n. Chr. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 2003.Google Scholar
Mennen, Inge. Power and Status in the Roman Empire, AD 193–284. Boston: Brill, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22 (1988): 869–96.Google Scholar
Metcalf, William. “Whose ‘Liberalitas’?: Propaganda and Audience in the Early Roman Empire.” RIN 95 (1993): 337–46.Google Scholar
Metzger, Ernest. A New Outline of the Roman Civil Trial. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Elizabeth. Legitimacy and Law in the Roman World: Tabulae in Roman Belief and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Zwiffelhoffer, Eckhard. “Ein Visionär auf dem Thron?: Kaiser Commodus, Hercules Romanus.” Klio 88 (2006): 189–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignone, Lisa. “Rome’s Pomerium and the Aventine Hill: From Auguraculum to Imperium Sine Fine.” Historia 65 (2016): 427–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Fergus. “A New Approach to the Roman Jurists.” JRS 76 (1986): 272–80.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus “Emperors at Work.” JRS 57 (1967): 9–19.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus “Empire and City, Augustus to Julian: Obligations, Excuses and Status.” JRS 73 (1983): 76–96.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus The Emperor in the Roman World, 31 BC–AD 337. Ithaca [NY]: Cornell University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn. “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984): 151–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David, and Sarris, Peter, eds. The Novels of Justinian: A Complete Annotated English Translation. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Milnor, Kristina. Gender, Domesticity, and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Milnor, Kristina “Augustus, History, and the Landscape of the Law.” Arethusa 40 (2007): 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mineo, Bernard, and Hurlet, Frédéric, eds. Le principat d’Auguste: Réalités et représentations du pouvoir autour de la res publica restituta. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2009.Google Scholar
van Minnen, Peter. “Three Edicts of Caracalla?: A New Reading of P.Giss. 40.” Chiron 46 (2016): 205–21.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Richard. “Roman History, Roman Law, and Roman Priests: The Common Ground.” University of Illinois Law Review 1984.3 (1984): 541–60.Google Scholar
Mitteis, Ludwig. Reichsrecht und Volksrecht in den östlichen Provinzen des Römischen Kaiserreichs: Mit Beiträgen zur Kenntniss des griechischen Rechts und der spätrömischen Rechtsentwicklung. Leipzig: Teubner, 1891.Google Scholar
Moatti, Claudia. Res publica: Histoire romaine de la chose publique. Paris: Fayard, 2018.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor. “Die Heimath des Gregorianus.” ZRG 22 (1901): 139–44.Google Scholar
Morgan, Gwyn. 69 AD: The Year of Four Emperors. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Morgan, Teresa. Popular Morality in the Early Roman Empire. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrell, Kit. “Augustus as Magpie.” In Morrell, , Osgood, , and Welch, (eds.), The Alternative Augustan Age, 12–26. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrell, Kit, Osgood, Josiah, and Welch, Kathryn, eds. The Alternative Augustan Age. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang. “The Recovery of Justinian’s Digest in the Middle Ages.” Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law 20 (1990): 1–30.Google Scholar
Murison, Charles. Rebellion and Reconstruction: Galba to Domitian: An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History, Books 64–67 (A.D. 68–96). Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Nappa, Christopher. Making Men Ridiculous: Juvenal and the Anxieties of the Individual. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Nasti, Fara. “Greek Thought and Roman Jurists: A Preliminary Survey on Pomponius’s Enchiridion.” In Nasti, and Schiavone, (eds.), Jurists and Legal Science, 137–58. London: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Nasti, Fara L’attività normativa di Severo Alessandro. Naples: Satura, 2006.Google Scholar
Nasti, Fara L’Enchiridion di Sesto Pomponio: una ricostruzione. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2023.Google Scholar
Nasti, Fara, and Schiavone, Aldo, eds. Jurists and Legal Science in the History of Roman Law. London: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Nellen, Henk. Hugo Grotius: A Lifelong Struggle for Peace in Church and State, 1583–1645. Boston: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Nelson, Hein. “Das Fragment über die cretio in der Autuner Gaiusparaphrase.” Subseciva Groningana 2 (1985): 1–20.Google Scholar
Nelson, Hein Überlieferung, Aufbau und Stil von Gai Institutiones. Leiden: Brill, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nethercut, Jason. “Ennius and the Revaluation of Traditional Historiography in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura.” In Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World, edited by Ker, James and Pieper, Christoph, 435–61. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Newlands, Carole. “Contesting Time and Space: Fasti 6.637–48.” In Ovid’s Fasti: Historical Readings at Its Bimillennium, edited by Herbert-Brown, Geraldine, 225–50. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Newlands, Carole Playing with Time: Ovid and the Fasti. Ithaca [NY]: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Newlands, Carole Statius’ Silvae and the Poetics of Empire. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolai, Helmut. Die rassegesetzliche Rechtslehre: Grundzüge einer nationalsozialistischen Rechtsphilosophie. Munich: Nationalsozialisten Bibliothek, 1932.Google Scholar
Noailles, Pierre, and Dain, Alphonse, eds. Les Novelles de Léon VI, Le Sage. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1944.Google Scholar
Noe, Christopher. “The ‘Age of Iron and Rust’ in Cassius Dio’s Roman History: Influences from Stoic Philosophy.” In Cassius Dio and the Principate, edited by Burden-Strevens, Christopher, Madsen, Jesper, and Pistellato, Antonio, 141–63. Venice: Ca’ Foscari, 2020.Google Scholar
Noreña, Carlos. Imperial Ideals in the Roman West: Representation, Circulation, Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Noreña, Carlos “Medium and Message in Vespasian’s Templum Pacis.” MAAR 48 (2003): 25–43.Google Scholar
Noreña, Carlos “Self-Fashioning in the Panegyricus.” In Roche, (ed.), Pliny’s Praise, 29–44. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noreña, Carlos “The Ethics of Autocracy in the Roman World.” In A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought, edited by Balot, Ryan, 266–79. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Nörr, Dieter. Rechtskritik in der römischen Antike. Munich, 1974.Google Scholar
Nörr, Dieter “Zur Rescriptenpraxis in der hohen Prinzipatzeit.” ZRG 98 (1981): 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutton, Vivian. Ancient Medicine. London; New York: Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliensis, Ellen. “Ut Arte Emendaturus Fortunam: Horace, Nasidienus, and the Art of Satire.” In Habinek, and Schiesaro, (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution, 90–104. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society, 1997.Google Scholar
Oliver, James. Greek Constitutions of Early Roman Emperors from Inscriptions and Papyri. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1989.Google Scholar
Oliver, James “The Athens of Hadrian.” In Les empereurs romains d’Espagne, edited by Piganiol, André, 123–33. Paris: Éditions du CNRS, 1965.Google Scholar
Oliver, James “The Ruling Power: A Study of the Roman Empire in the Second Century after Christ through the Roman Oration of Aelius Aristides.” TAPhS 43 (1953): 871–1003.Google Scholar
Oliver, James, and Palmer, Robert. “Text of the Tabula Hebana.” AJP 75 (1954): 225–49.Google Scholar
Optendrenk, Theo. Die Religionspolitik des Kaisers Elagabal im Spiegel der Historia Augusta. Bonn: Habelt, 1969.Google Scholar
Osborne, Robin. “Euergetism and the Public Economy of Classical Athens: The Initiative of the Deme.” In The Power of Individual and Community in Ancient Athens and Beyond: Essays in Honour of John K. Davies, edited by Archibald, Zosia and Haywood, Jan, 147–62. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2019.Google Scholar
Osgood, Josiah. “Cassius Dio’s Secret History of Elagabalus.” In Lange, and Madsen, (eds.), Greek Intellectual, 177–92. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Osgood, Josiah “Ending Civil War at Rome: Rhetoric and Reality, 88 BCE–197 C.E.” AHR 120 (2015): 1683–95.Google Scholar
Osgood, Josiah Turia: A Roman Woman’s Civil War. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Osler, Douglas. “The Fantasy Men.” Rechtsgeschichte 10 (2007): 169–92.Google Scholar
Palazzolo, Nicola. “Dalle cognitiones alla cognitio: principe e giuristi verso la costruzione del nuovo sistema processuale.” In I tribunali dell’Impero, edited by Milazzo, Francesco, 217–40. Milan: Giuffrè, 2015.Google Scholar
Palmer, Robert. “The Topography and Social History of Rome’s Trastevere.” PAPhS 125 (1981): 368–97.Google Scholar
Pandey, Nandini. The Poetics of Power in Augustan Rome: Latin Poetic Responses to Early Imperial Iconography. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pangerl, Andreas. “Zwei feindliche Brüder: Caracalla und Geta.” In Portraits: 500 Years of Roman Coin Portraits, edited by Pangerl, Andreas, 375–81. Munich: Staatliche Münzsammlung München, 2017.Google Scholar
Pani, Mario. “Costituzionalismo antico: la lex de imperio Vespasiani.” In Storia romana e storia moderna: Fasi in prospettiva, edited by Pani, Mario, 101–14. Bari: Edipuglia, 2005.Google Scholar
Paradisi, Bruno, ed. La critica del testo. Florence: Olschki, 1971.Google Scholar
Paschalis, Michael. “The Afterlife of Emperor Claudius in Seneca’s Apocolocyntosis.” Numen 56 (2009): 198–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, August Friedrich von, et al., eds. Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart: Druckenmüller Verlag, 1893.Google Scholar
Pazdernik, Charles. “Justinianic Ideology and the Power of the Past.” In Maas, (ed.), Age of Justinian, 185–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Peachin, Michael. “Exemplary Government in the Early Roman Empire.” In Crises and the Roman Empire, edited by Hekster, Olivier, de Kleijn, Gerda, and Slootjes, Daniëlle, 75–93. Boston: Brill, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peachin, Michael Iudex Vice Caesaris: Deputy Emperors and the Administration of Justice During the Principate. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar
Peachin, Michael “Jurists and the Law in the Early Roman Empire.” In de Blois, (ed.), Administration, Prosopography and Appointment Policies, 109–20. Amsterdam: Gieben, 2001.Google Scholar
Peachin, Michael “Weitere Gedanken zum Prozess des Verfassens kaiserliche Reskripte.” In Babusiaux, and Kob, (eds.), Das Recht der “Soldatenkaiser,” 211–24. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015.Google Scholar
Peer, Ayelet. “Cassius Dio, Cicero, and the Complexity of Civil War.” In Lange, and Scott, (eds.), Impact of Violence, 219–40. Boston: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar
Pernot, Laurent. “Aelius Aristides and Rome.” In Aelius Aristides: Between Greece, Rome, and the Gods, edited by Harris, William and Holmes, Brooke, 175–201. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Pernot, Laurent Epideictic Rhetoric: Questioning the Stakes of Ancient Praise. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Pernot, Laurent La rhétorique de l’éloge dans le monde gréco-romain. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, 1993.Google Scholar
Perry, Matthew. “Defining Gender.” In du Plessis, , Ando, , and Tuori, (eds.), Roman Law and Society, 432–42. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Piacente, Daniele. “Giurisprudenza e fonti del diritto romano nella tarda Antiquità.” Classica et Christiana 8 (2013): 287–98.Google Scholar
Pilipow, Ryan. “The Jeweled Jurist: Late Roman Legal Aesthetics.” SLA 4 (2020): 185–202.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. The Oxford Latin Syntax. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaza, Maria. “Solventur Risu Tabulae: Saved by Laughter in Horace (S. II.i.80–6) and Apuleius (Met. III.i-Ii).” C&M 54 (2003): 353–58.Google Scholar
du Plessis, Paul, Ando, Clifford, and Tuori, Kaius, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulter, Andrew. “Why Did Most Cities in Moesia and Thrace Survive During the 3rd-Century ‘Crisis’?” In Empire in Crisis: Gothic Invasions and Roman Historiography, edited by Mitthof, Fritz, Martin, Gunther, and Grusková, Jana. Vienna: Holzhausen, 2020.Google Scholar
Powell, Jonathan. “Juvenal and the Delatores.” In Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman, edited by Kraus, Christina, Marincola, John, and Pelling, Christopher, 224–44. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Pugsley, David. “Gaius or Sextus Pomponius.” RIDA 41 (1994): 353–67.Google Scholar
Pugsley, David “Justinian, Bluhme and the Numbers Game: Or How Precise Is Bluhme’s Massentheorie.” Fundamina 11 (2005): 63–77.Google Scholar
Puliatti, Salvatore. “La politica legislativa di Giustiniano.” In Mantovani, and Padoa, Schioppa, (eds.), Interpretare il Digesto, 135–73. Pavia: IUSS Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Purpura, Gianfranco. “I papiri e le costituzioni imperiali in Egitto.” Aegyptus 89 (2009): 155–220.Google Scholar
Purpura, Gianfranco “Sulla tavola perduta della Lex de Auctoritate Vespasiani.” Minima epigraphica et papyrologica 2 (1999): 261–95.Google Scholar
Raditsa, Leo. “Augustus’ Legislation Concerning Marriage, Procreation, Love Affairs and Adultery.” ANRW 2.13 (1980): 278–339.Google Scholar
Raggi, Andrea. “Cross-Dressing in Rome between Norm and Practice.” In Campanile, , Carlà-Uhink, , and Facella, (eds.), TransAntiquity, 38–51. London; New York: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rantala, Jussi. The Ludi Saeculares of Septimius Severus: The Ideologies of a New Roman Empire. New York: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebeggiani, Stefano. “From Civil War to Foreign Expansion: Cultural Identity and the Hellenization of the Empire in Statius and Valerius Flaccus.” RCCM 64 (2022): 41–60.Google Scholar
Reeves, M. Barbara. “The ‘Feriale Duranum’, Roman Military Religion, and Dura -Europos: A Reassessment.” Ph.D., State University of New York at Buffalo, 2005.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah. Access to Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Riccobono, Salvatore, ed. Fontes iuris romani antejustiniani. Florence: S.A.G. Barbèra, 1968.Google Scholar
Riccobono, Salvatore Ius et ars boni et aequi. Naples: Jovene, 1947.Google Scholar
Rich, John. “Consensus Rituals and the Origin of the Principate.” In Il Princeps romano, autocrate o magistrato? Fattori giuridici e fattori sociali del potere imperiale da Augusto a Commodo, edited by Ferrary, Jean-Louis and Scheid, John, 101–38. Pavia: IUSS Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Rich, John “Making the Emergency Permanent: Auctoritas, Potestas and the Evolution of the Principate of Augustus.” CEFRA 458 (2012): 37–121.Google Scholar
Rich, John The Augustan Settlement: Roman History (53.1–55.9). Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1990.Google Scholar
Rich, John, and Williams, Jonathan. “Leges et Iura p. r. Restituit: A New Aureus of Octavian and the Settlement of 28–27 B.C.” NC 159 (1999): 169–213.Google Scholar
Richlin, Amy. “Not Before Homosexuality: The Materiality of the Cinaedus and the Roman Law against Love between Men.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 3 (1993): 523–73.Google Scholar
Richlin, Amy Slave Theater in the Roman Republic: Plautus and Popular Comedy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedlberger, Peter. Prolegomena zu den spätantiken Konstitutionen: nebst einer Analyse der erbrechtlichen und verwandten Sanktionen gegen Heterodoxe. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggsby, Andrew. Roman Law and the Legal World of the Romans. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggsby, Andrew “Roman Legal Education.” In A Companion to Ancient Education, edited by Bloomer, W. Martin, 444–51. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2015.Google Scholar
Robinson, Olivia. The Sources of Roman Law: Problems and Methods for Ancient Historians. London; New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Robinson, Timothy. “In the Court of Time: The Reckoning of a Monster in the Apocolocyntosis.” Arethusa 38 (2005): 223–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, Paul, ed. Pliny’s Praise: The Panegyricus in the Roman World. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, Paul “Pliny’s Thanksgiving: An Introduction to the Panegyricus.” In Roche, (ed.), Pliny’s Praise, 1–28. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Martín, José-Domingo. Fragmenta augustodunensia. Granada: Editorial Comares, 1998.Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, David. The Play of Allusion in the Historia Augusta. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roller, Matthew “Demolished Houses, Monumentality, and Memory in Roman Culture.” ClAnt 29 (2010): 117–80.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew “Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia.” CP 99 (2004): 1–56.Google Scholar
Roller, Matthew Models from the Past in Roman Culture: A World of Exempla. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Roussel, Pierre, and De Visscher, Fernand. “Les Inscriptions du temple de Dmeir.” Syria 23 (1942): 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, Clare. “Becoming Jupiter: Severus Alexander, the Temple of Jupiter Ultor, and Jovian Iconography on Roman Imperial Coinage.” AJN 21 (2009): 123–50.Google Scholar
Rowan, Clare “The Procession of Elagabalus and the Problem of the Parasols.” Journal of the Numismatic Association of Australia 17 (2006): 114–19.Google Scholar
Rowan, Clare Under Divine Auspices: Divine Ideology and the Visualisation of Imperial Power in the Severan Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Rubin, Zvi. Civil-War Propaganda and Historiography. Brussels: Peeters, 1980.Google Scholar
Ruciński, Sebastian. Praefectus urbi: Le gardien de l’ordre public à Rome sous le Haut-Empire Romain. Translated by Bernadeta Pyśk. Poznań: Contact, 2009.Google Scholar
Ruggiero, Iolanda. Ricerche sulle Pauli Sententiae. Milan: Giuffrè, 2017.Google Scholar
Russell, Amy. The Politics of Public Space in Republican Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Russell, Amy “The Populus Romanus as the Source of Public Opinion.” In Communicating Public Opinion in the Roman Republic, edited by López, Cristina Rosillo, 41–56. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2019.Google Scholar
Russo Ruggeri, Carmela. Studi sulle quinquaginta decisiones. Milan: Giuffrè, 1999.Google Scholar
Rutledge, Steven. “Delatores and the Tradition of Violence in Roman Oratory.” AJP 120 (1999): 555–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saïd, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Saksena, Priyasha. “Jousting over Jurisdiction: Sovereignty and International Law in Late Nineteenth-Century South Asia.” LHR 38 (2020): 409–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, Luis Alejandro. “Medicine as Competitive Performance: Eristic and Erudition – Galen on Erasistratus and the Arteries.” In Bubb, and Peachin, (eds.), Medicine and the Law, 124–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Saller, Richard. Personal Patronage Under the Early Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salway, Benet. “A Fragment of Severan History: The Unusual Career of … atus, Praetorian Prefect of Elagabalus.” Chiron 27 (1997): 127–53.Google Scholar
Santos, Francisco Andrés. “Brevissima storia della critica interpolazionistica nelle fonti giuridiche romane.” Revista de estudios histórico-jurídicos 33 (2011): 65–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Francisco Andrés “El interpolacionismo: Auge y decadencia de un método de investigación sobre el Digesto.” In Mantovani, and Schioppa, Padoa (eds.), Interpretare il Digesto, 557–95. Pavia: IUSS Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Sapsford, Tom. Performing the “Kinaidos”: Unmanly Men in Ancient Mediterranean Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarris, Peter. Economy and Society in the Age of Justinian. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarris, Peter Justinian: Emperor, Soldier, Saint. New York: Basic Books, 2023.Google Scholar
Sautel, Gérard. “Usurpations du pouvoir impérial dans le monde romain et rescissio actorum.” In Studi in onore di Pietro de Francisci, edited by Giuffrè, Antonino, 461–91. Milan: Giuffrè, 1956.Google Scholar
Scarlata Fazio, Mariano. “Brevi osservazioni sull’opera di Papirio Giusto Constitutionum l. XX.” SDHI 5 (1939): 414–19.Google Scholar
Scarry, Elaine. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Thomas. Imperii insignia: Sella curulis und Fasces. Zur Repräsentation römischer Magistrate. Mainz: Zabern, 1989.Google Scholar
Scheid, John, Tassini, Paola, and Rüpke, Jörg. Recherches archéologiques à la Magliana: Commentarii Fratrum Arvalium qui supersunt: les copies épigraphiques des protocoles annuels de la confrérie arvale: 21 av.-304 ap. J.-C. Rome: Ecole Française de Rome, 1998.Google Scholar
Schiavone, Aldo. Ius: L’invenzione del diritto in Occidente. 2nd ed. Turin: Giulio Einaudi, 2017.Google Scholar
Schiavone, Aldo “Singularity and Impersonality in the Thought of Roman Jurists.” In Nasti, and Schiavone, (eds.), Jurists and Legal Science, 3–11. London: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred. “Claudius und Vespasian: Eine neue Interpretation des Wortes vae, puto, Deus fio (Suet. Vesp. 23,4).” Chiron 18 (1988): 83–89.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Hofner, Sebastian. “Ostentatious Legislation: Law and Dynastic Change, AD 364–365.” In Contested Monarchy: Integrating the Roman Empire in the Fourth Century A.D., edited by Wienand, Johannes, 67–99. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Hofner, Sebastian Reagieren und Gestalten: Der Regierungsstil des spätrömischen Kaisers am Beispiel der Gesetzgebung Valentinians I. Munich: Beck, 2008.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Translated by George Schwab. Cambridge [MA]: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Schöpe, Björn. Der römische Kaiserhof in severischer Zeit (193–235 n. Chr). Stuttgart: Steiner, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopen, Gregory. “On Emptying Chamber Pots Without Looking and the Urban Location of Buddhist Nunneries in Early India Again.” Journal Asiatique 296 (2008): 229–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Fritz. A History of Roman Legal Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Schulz, Fritz “A New Approach to Bracton.” Seminar 2 (1944): 41–50.Google Scholar
Schulz, Fritz “Bracton and Raymond de Peñafort.” Law Quarterly Review 61 (1945): 286–92.Google Scholar
Schulz, Fritz “Bracton as a Computist.” Traditio 3 (1945): 265–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Fritz “Bracton on Kingship.” The English Historical Review 60 (1945): 136–76.Google Scholar
Schulz, Fritz “Critical Studies on Bracton’s Treatise.” Law Quarterly Review 59 (1943): 172–80.Google Scholar
Schulz, Fritz Principles of Roman Law. Translated by Marguerite Wolff. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Schulz, Fritz “System der Rechte auf den Eingriffserwerb.” Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 105 (1909): 1–488.Google Scholar
Schuol, Monika. “Die Rechtsschule in Berytus: römische Jurisprudenz im Vorderen Orient.” In Interkulturalität in der Alten Welt: Vorderasien, Hellas, Ägypten und die vielfältigen Ebenen des Kontakts, edited by Rollinger, Robert, et al., 161–84. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2010.Google Scholar
Scott, Andrew. “Cassius Dio and the Age of Iron and Rust.” In Brill’s Companion to Cassius Dio, edited by Madsen, Jesper and Scott, Andrew, 324–47. Leiden: Brill, 2023.Google Scholar
Scott, Andrew “Cassius Dio, Caracalla, and the Senate.” Klio 97 (2015): 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Andrew Emperors and Usurpers: An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 79(78)–80(80) (A.D. 217–229). New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Andrew “Historiographic Method and Self-Presentation in Cassius Dio’s Contemporary History.” In Madsen, and Lange, (eds.), Cassius Dio the Historian, 223–41. Boston: Brill, 2021.Google Scholar
Scott, Andrew “The Legitimization of Elagabalus and Cassius Dio’s Account of the Reign of Macrinus.” JAH 1 (2013): 242–53.Google Scholar
Scott, Rebecca, and Venegas Fornias, Carlos. “María Coleta and the Capuchin Friar: Slavery, Salvation, and the Adjudication of Status.” William and Mary Quarterly 76 (2019): 727–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeck, Otto, ed. Notitia dignitatum: accedunt Notitia urbis Constantinopolitanae et laterculi prouinciarum. Berlin: Weidmann, 1876.Google Scholar
Sewell, William. “Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology.” In The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences, edited by McDonald, Terrence, 245–80. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Shannon-Henderson, Kelly. “What Makes a Divus? The Prospective Rhetoric of Deification in Pliny’s Panegyricus.” In Rhetoric and Religion in Ancient Greece and Rome, edited by Papaioannou, Sophia, Serafim, Andreas, and Demetriou, Kyriakos, 221–44. De Gruyter, 2021.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Scott. Legality. London: Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Brent. “Raising and Killing Children: Two Roman Myths.” Mnemosyne 54 (2001): 31–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sickle, Clifton van. “The Headings of Rescripts of the Severi in the Justinian Code.” CP 23 (1928): 270–77.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva. “Constitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict and Constitutional Change: The Case of the de Facto ERA.” California Law Review 94 (2006): 1323–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijpesteijn, Pieter. “Macrinus’ Damnatio memoriae und die Papyri.” ZPE 13 (1974): 219–27.Google Scholar
Simon, Dietrich. Konstantinisches Kaiserrecht: Studien anhand der Reskriptenpraxis und des Schenkungsrechts. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1977.Google Scholar
Sirks, Boudewijn. “Did the Published Theodosian Code Include Obsolete Constitutions?” TvR 89 (2021): 70–92.Google Scholar
Sirks, Boudewijn “Making a Request to the Emperor: Rescripts in the Roman Empire.” In de Blois, (ed.). Administration, Prosopography and Appointment Policies, 121–35. Amsterdam: Gieben, 2001.Google Scholar
Sirks, Boudewijn “The Sources of the Code.” In Harries, and Wood, (eds.), The Theodosian Code, 45–67. London: Duckworth, 1993.Google Scholar
Sirks, Boudewijn The Theodosian Code: A Study. Friedrichsdorf: Éditions Tortuga, 2007.Google Scholar
Skinner, Marilyn. “Horace, Catullus, and Maecenas.” SyllClass 24 (2013): 29–45.Google Scholar
Sommer, Michael. “‘A Vast Scene of Confusion’: Die Krise des 3. Jahrhunderts in der Forschung.” In Babusiaux, and Kolb, (eds.), Das Recht der “Soldatenkaiser,” 15–30. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Sommer, Michael “Elagabal: Wege zur Konstruktion eines ‘schlechten’ Kaisers.” SCI 23 (2004): 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sontag, Susan. “Notes on Camp.” In Against Interpretation: And Other Essays, by Susan Sontag, 275–92. New York: Octagon Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Soraci, Rosario. L’opera legislativa e amministrativa dell’imperatore Severo Alessandro. Catania: Muglia, 1974.Google Scholar
Southern, Richard. The Making of the Middle Ages. London; New York: Hutchinson’s University Library, 1953.Google Scholar
Spagnuolo Vigorita, Tullio. Casta domus: Un seminario sulla legislazione matrimoniale augustea. 3rd ed. Naples: Jovene, 2010.Google Scholar
Speidel, Michael. “Maximinus and the Thracians: Herodian on the Coup of 235, and Ethnic Networks in the Roman Army of the Third Century C.E.” In Mobility in Research on the Black Sea Region, edited by Cojocaru, Victor and Rubel, Alexander, 339–65. Cluj-Napoca: Mega, 2016.Google Scholar
Sperandio, Marco. Codex Gregorianus: Origini e vicende. Naples: Jovene, 2005.Google Scholar
Starr, Sonja. “Testing Racial Profiling: Empirical Assessment of Disparate Treatment by Police Policing the Police.” University of Chicago Legal Forum (2016): 485–532.Google Scholar
Stein, Peter. Roman Law in European History. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Peter “The Two Schools of Jurists in the Early Roman Principate.” The Cambridge Law Journal 31 (1972): 8–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinwenter, Artur. “Νόμος ἔμψυχος: Zur Geschichte einer politischen Theorie.” Anzeiger der Philosophisch-Historischen Klasse 83 (1946): 250–68.Google Scholar
Stewart, Roberta. Plautus and Roman Slavery. Malden [MA]: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara. The Emperor’s Old Clothes: Constitutional History and the Symbolic Language of the Holy Roman Empire. Translated by Thomas Dunlap. New York: Berghahn Books, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolte, Bernard. “Codification in Byzantium: From Justinian I to Leo VI.” In Diverging Paths? The Shapes of Power and Institutions in Medieval Christendom and Islam, edited by Hudson, John and Rodríguez, Ana, 59–74. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Stone Peters, Julie. Law as Performance: Theatricality, Spectatorship, and the Making of Law in Ancient, Medieval, and Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin Roman Law in the State of Nature: The Classical Foundations of Hugo Grotius’ Natural Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, David. The Living Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Strazdins, Estelle. Fashioning the Future in Roman Greece: Memory, Monuments, Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. “Switching the Default Rule.” New York University Law Review 77 (2002): 106–34.Google Scholar
Swan, Peter. The Augustan Succession: An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History, Books 55–56 (9 B.C.–A.D. 14). New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Syme, Ronald. Emperors and Biography: Studies in the Historia Augusta. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Syme, Ronald “Lawyers in Government: The Case of Ulpian.” PAPhS 116 (1972): 406–9.Google Scholar
Syme, Ronald “Who Was Vedius Pollio?” JRS 51 (1961): 23–30.Google Scholar
Tait, Allison, and Norris, Luke. “Narrative and the Origins of Law.” Law and Humanities 5 (2011): 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbert, Richard. The Senate of Imperial Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tani, Karen. States of Dependency: Welfare, Rights, and American Governance, 1935–1972. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Tarel, Philippe. Titus. Paris: Ellipses, 2016.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. Jeffrey. “Ultra Legem: Law and Literature in Horace, ‘Satires’ II.1.” Mnemosyne 51 (1998): 688–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temporini, Hildegard. Die Kaiserinnen Roms: Von Livia bis Theodora. Munich: Beck, 2002.Google Scholar
Thesaurus linguae latinae. Leipzig: Teubner, 1907.Google Scholar
Thomas, Rosalind. “Writing, Law, and Written Law.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law, edited by Gagarin, Michael and Cohen, David, 41–60. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Yan. “Vitae Necisque Potestas: The Father, The State, Death.” In Legal Artifices: Ten Essays on Roman Law in the Present Tense, by Yan Thomas, edited by Zartaloudis, Thanos and Francis, Cooper, 144–209. Translated by Schütz, Chantal and Schütz, Anton. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Edward. Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act. London: Allen Lane, 1975.Google Scholar
Thomson, Mark. Studies in the Historia Augusta. Brussels: Éditions Latomus, 2012.Google Scholar
Todisco, Elisabetta. “La res publica restituta e i Fasti Praenestini.” In Epigrafia e territorio, politica e società: Temi di antichità romane, edited by Pani, Mario, 341–58. Bari: Edipuglia, 2007.Google Scholar
Treggiari, Susan. Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, Kaius. Ancient Roman Lawyers and Modern Legal Ideals: Studies on the Impact of Contemporary Concerns in the Interpretation of Ancient Roman Legal History. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2007.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaius “Augustus, Legislative Power, and the Power of Appearances.” Fundamina (2014): 938–45.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaius “Dig. 34,2,33: The Return of the Cross-Dressing Senator.” Arctos 43 (2009): 191–200.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaius Empire of Law: Nazi Germany, Exile Scholars and the Battle for the Future of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, Kaius “Greek Tyranny and Roman Emperors During the Severan Period: A Case Study of P. Col. 123 and SEG 17.759.” BICS 55 (2012): 111–19.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaius “Hadrian’s Perpetual Edict: Ancient Sources and Modern Ideals in the Making of a Historical Tradition.” JLH 27 (2006): 219–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, Kaius “Legal Pluralism and the Roman Empires.” In Beyond Dogmatics, edited by Cairns, John and du Plessis, Paul, 39–52. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaius The Emperor of Law: The Emergence of Roman Imperial Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, Kaius “The Ius Respondendi and the Freedom of Roman Jurisprudence.” RIDA 51 (2004): 295–338.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaius “The Myth of Quintus Mucius Scaevola: Founding Father of Legal Science.” Legal History Review 72 (2004): 243–62.Google Scholar
Turcan, Robert. Héliogabale et le sacre du soleil. Paris: Michel, 1985.Google Scholar
Turpin, William. “The Law Codes and Late Roman Law.” RIDA 32 (1985): 339–53.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. “Critical Legal Studies: A Political History.” Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 1515–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark “Following the Rules Laid Down: A Critique of Interpretivism and Neutral Principles.” Harvard Law Review 96 (1983): 781–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark The American Law of Slavery, 1810–1860: Considerations of Humanity and Interest. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Tziovas, Dēmētrēs, ed. Re-Imagining the Past: Antiquity and Modern Greek Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uden, James. The Invisible Satirist: Juvenal and Second-Century Rome. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. “The Critical Legal Studies Movement.” Harvard Law Review 96 (1983): 561–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urso, Gianpaolo. “Cassius Dio’s Sulla: Exemplum of Cruelty and Republican Dictator.” In Lange, and Madsen, (eds.), Greek Intellectual, 13–32. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Vacca, Letizia. “In tema di bonorum possessio contra tabulas.” BIDR 80 (1977): 159–93.Google Scholar
Van Voorhis, Julie, and Abbe, Mark. Imperial Colors: The Roman Portrait Busts of Septimius Severus and Julia Domna, Sidney and Lois Eskenazi Museum of Art, Indiana University. Bloomington: Giles, 2023.Google Scholar
Varner, Eric. Mutilation and Transformation: Damnatio Memoriae and Roman Imperial Portraiture. Boston: Brill, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varner, Eric “Portraits, Plots, and Politics: Damnatio Memoriae and the Images of Imperial Women.” MAAR 46 (2001): 41–93.Google Scholar
Vernay, Eugène. “Note sur le changement de style dans les constitutions impériales de Dioclétien à Constantin.” In Études d’histoire juridique offertes a Paul Frédéric Girard, 2: 263–74. Paris: Geuthner, 1913.Google Scholar
Veyne, Paul. Le pain et le cirque: Sociologie historique d’un pluralisme politique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidas, Moulie, and Chin, Catherine Michael, eds. Late Ancient Knowing. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Vigneron, Roger. “L’antiféministe Loi Voconia et les Schleichwege des Lebens.” Labeo 29 (1983): 140–53.Google Scholar
Vittinghoff, Friedrich. Der Staatsfeind in der römischen Kaiserzeit: Untersuchungen zur damnatio memoriae. Berlin: Junker und Dünnhaupt, 1936.Google Scholar
Volterra, Edoardo. “L’ouvrage de Papirius Iustus Constitutionum Libri XX.” In Symbolae iuridicae et historicae Martino David dedicatae, edited by Ankum, Hans, Feenstra, Robert, and Leemans, Wilhelmus, 215–23. Leiden: Brill, 1968.Google Scholar
Wacke, Andreas. “Die potentiores in den Rechtsquellen: Einfluss und Abwehr gesellschaftlicher Übermacht in der Rechtspflege der Römer.” ANRW 2.13 (1980): 562–607.Google Scholar
Wagemann, Arnold. Deutsche Rechtsvergangenheit als Wegweiser in eine deutsche Zukunft. Jena: Fischer, 1922.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Stare Decisis and the Rule of Law: A Layered Approach.” Michigan Law Review 111 (2012): 1–32.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. “Civilis Princeps: Between Citizen and King.” JRS 72 (1982): 32–48.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew “Mutatio Morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution.” In Habinek, and Schiesaro, (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution, 3–22. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society, 1997.Google Scholar
Wankerl, Veronika. Appello ad principem: Urteilsstil und Urteilstechnik in kaiserlichen Berufungsentscheidungen (Augustus bis Caracalla). Munich: Beck, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, Kenneth. “The Second Dynasty of Rome.” Phoenix 17 (1963): 198–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Alan. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1974.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan “Review of T. Honoré, ‘Emperors and Lawyers.’” TvR 50 (1982): 409–14.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan The Law of Succession in the Later Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan The Spirit of Roman Law. Athens; London: University of Georgia Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan, Krueger, Paul, and Mommsen, Theodor, eds. The Digest of Justinian. 4 vols. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Weaver, Paul. Familia Caesaris: A Social Study of the Emperor’s Freedmen and Slaves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (P. Siebeck), 1922.Google Scholar
Weeda, Leendert. Horace’s Sermones Book 1: Credentials for Maecenas. Berlin; Warsaw: De Gruyter, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Kimberly. Black Litigants in the Antebellum American South. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Wen, Shanshan. Communal Dining in the Roman West: Private Munificence towards Cities and Associations in the First Three Centuries AD. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Leopold. Die Quellen des römischen Rechts. Vienna: Holzhausen, 1953.Google Scholar
Wenger, Leopold “Ein Prozess von Caracalla in Syrien: Zu einer neu bekannt gewordenen Inschrift.” AIPhO 11 (1951): 469–504.Google Scholar
William, Westermann, and Arthur Schiller, A.. Apokrimata: Decisions of Septimius Severus on Legal Matters. New York: Columbia University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Natasha. The Life and Death of States: Central Europe and the Transformation of Modern Sovereignty. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whewell, Emily. Law Across Imperial Borders: British Consuls and Colonial Connections on China’s Western Frontiers, 1880–1943. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Whitman, James. The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era: Historical Vision and Legal Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmarsh, Tim. Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Wibier, Matthijs. “Legal Education and Legal Culture in Gaul During the Principate.” In Law in the Roman Provinces, edited by Czajkowski, Kimberley, Eckhardt, Benedikt, and Strothmann, Meret, 462–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Wibier, Matthijs “Legal Education, Realpolitik, and the Propagation of the Emperor’s Justice.” In Hekster, and Verboven, (eds.), Impact of Justice, 86–102. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Wibier, Matthijs “Marcus Antistius Labeo and the Idea of Legal Literature.” In Ziogas, and Bexley, (eds.), Roman Law and Latin Literature, 125–44. London: Bloomsbury, 2022.Google Scholar
Wibier, Matthijs “Transmitting Legal Knowledge: From Question-and-Answer Format to Handbook in Gaius’ Institutes.” In Between Orality and Literacy: Communication and Adaptation in Antiquity, edited by Scodel, Ruth, 356–73. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz. Römische Rechtsgeschichte: Quellenkunde, Rechtsbildung, Jurisprudenz und Rechtsliteratur. 2 vols. Munich: Beck, 1988.Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz “Textkritik und Sachforschung: Positionen in der gegenwärtigen Romanistik.” ZR 91 (1974): 1–40.Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz Textstufen klassischer Juristen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1960.Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz “Zur gegenwärtigen Lage der romanistischen Textkritik.” In Paradisi, (ed.), La critica del testo, 1099–1122. Florence: Olschki, 1971.Google Scholar
Wilcken, Ulrich. “Zu den Kaiserreskripten.” Hermes 55 (1920): 1–42.Google Scholar
Wilcken, Ulrich “Zur Propositio libellorum.” APF 9 (1930): 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkes, John. Diocletian’s Palace, Split: Residence of a Retired Roman Emperor. Sheffield: Ian Sanders Memorial Committee, 1993.Google Scholar
Willems, Constantin. Justinian als Ökonom: Entscheidungsgründe und Entscheidungsmuster in den Quinquaginta decisiones. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Craig. Roman Homosexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Williams, Wynne. “Caracalla and the Authorship of Imperial Edicts and Epistles.” Latomus 38 (1979): 67–89.Google Scholar
Williams, Wynne “Caracalla and the Rhetoricians: A Note on the Cognitio de Goharienis.” Latomus 33 (1974): 663–67.Google Scholar
Williams, Wynne “The Libellus Procedure and the Severan Papyri.” JRS 64 (1974): 86–103.Google Scholar
Winterer, Caroline. The Culture of Classicism: Ancient Greece and Rome in American Intellectual Life, 1780–1910. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witschel, Christian. Krise, Rezession, Stagnation?: Der Westen des römischen Reiches im 3. Jahrhundert n. Chr. Frankfurt am Main: Clauss, 1999.Google Scholar
Wood, Susan. “A Too-Successful Damnatio Memoriae: Problems in Third-Century Roman Portraiture.” AJA 87 (1983): 489–96.Google Scholar
Woodman, Anthony. Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Woodman, Anthony, and Martin, Ronald. The Annals of Tacitus: Book 3. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Woolf, Greg. Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woudhuysen, George. “Uncovering Constans’ Image.” In Burgersdijk, and Ross, (eds.), Imagining Emperors, 158–82. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar
Woytek, Bernhard. “Elagabalus and the ‘Aedes Dei Invicti Solis Elagabali’ in Rome: The Numismatic Evidence.” NC 179 (2019): 205–24.Google Scholar
Yiftach-Firanko, Uri. “Law in Graeco-Roman Egypt: Hellenization, Fusion, Romanization.” In The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology, edited by Bagnall, Roger, 541–60. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Youtie, Herbert, Winter, John, Amundsen, Leiv, and Pearl, Orsamus. Papyri and Ostraca from Karanis. Vol. VI. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Zanker, Paul. Augustus und die Macht der Bilder. Munich: Beck, 1987.Google Scholar
Zaremby, Justin. Legal Realism and American Law. Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Zatloukal, Valerie. “Max Kaser’s ‘Roman Law as a Community Order’ and the ‘Crisis of Roman Law’ under the Nazi Regime.” Journal on European History of Law 11 (2020): 16–29.Google Scholar
Zehnacker, Hubert. “Quelques remarques sur Ie revers du nouvel aureus d’Octavien (28 av. J.-C).” BSFN 58 (2003): 1–3.Google Scholar
Zetzel, James. Critics, Compilers and Commentators: An Introduction to Roman Philology, 200 BCE–800 CE. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Reinhard. Roman Law, Contemporary Law, European Law: The Civilian Tradition Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziogas, Ioannis. Law and Love in Ovid: Courting Justice in the Age of Augustus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziogas, Ioannis “Orpheus and the Law: The Story of Myrrha in Ovid’s Metamorphoses.” Law in Context 34 (2016): 24–41.Google Scholar
Ziogas, Ioannis, and Bexley, Erica, eds. Roman Law and Latin Literature. London: Bloomsbury, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucca, Raimondo. “La Tavola di Esterzili e la controversia finium tra Vanacini e Mariani in Corsica.” In La Tavola di Esterzili: Il conflitto tra pastori e contadini nella Barbaria sarda, edited by Mastino, Attilio, 185–205. Sassari: Gallizzi, 1993.Google Scholar
Zuiderhoek, Arjan. The Politics of Munificence in the Roman Empire: Citizens, Elites and Benefactors in Asia Minor. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Zachary Herz, University of Colorado, Boulder
  • Book: The God and the Bureaucrat
  • Online publication: 17 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009629928.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Zachary Herz, University of Colorado, Boulder
  • Book: The God and the Bureaucrat
  • Online publication: 17 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009629928.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Zachary Herz, University of Colorado, Boulder
  • Book: The God and the Bureaucrat
  • Online publication: 17 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009629928.013
Available formats
×