Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-2bdfx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T15:14:24.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Historical Background and Theoretical Foundations of Jay Belsky’s Work in Evolutionary Developmental Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2025

Edited by
Satoshi Kanazawa
Satoshi Kanazawa
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Genes, Environments, and Differential Susceptibility
Current Topics in Evolutionary Developmental Psychology
 , pp. 7 - 80
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Baziyants, G., Dodge, K. A., Bai, Y., Goodman, W. B., O’Donnell, K., & Murphy, R. A. (2023). The effects of a universal short-term home visiting program: Two-year impact on parenting behavior and parent mental health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 140, 106140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J. (1978). Three theoretical models of child abuse: A critical review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(78)90005-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J. (1980). Child maltreatment: An ecological integration. American Psychologist, 35(4), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.4.320CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J. (1993). Etiology of child maltreatment: A developmental ecological analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.413CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, D. L., Dodge, K. A., & Campbell, S. K. (2010). Where and how to draw the line between reasonable corporal punishment and abuse. Law and Contemporary Problems, 73(2), 107–166.Google ScholarPubMed
Dodge, K. A., Goodman, W. B., Bai, Y., O’Donnell, K., & Murphy, R. A. (2019). A randomized controlled trial of a community agency-administered nurse home visitation program’s effects on program use and maternal and infant health outcomes. JAMA Network Open, 2(11), e1914522. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge, K. A., Goodman, W. B., Murphy, R. A., O’Donnell, K., Sato, J., & Guptill, S. (2014). Implementation and randomized controlled trial evaluation of universal postnatal nurse home visiting [Special Issue]. American Journal of Public Health, 104(Suppl. 1), S136–S143. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donelan-McCall, N., Eckenrode, J., & Olds, D. L. (2009). Home visiting for the prevention of child maltreatment: Lessons learned during the past 20 years. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 56(2), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2009.01.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffee, J. H., Mendelsohn, A. L., Kuo, A. A., Legano, L. A., Earls, M. F., Chilton, L. A., … & Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect (2017). Early childhood home visiting. Pediatrics, 140(3), e20172150. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-2150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckenrode, J., Campa, M., Luckey, D. W., Henderson, C. R., Cole, R., Kitzman, H., … & Olds, D. (2010). Long-term effects of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on the life course of youths: 19-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.240CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, A., & Lutzker, J. R. (2008). Iterations of the SafeCare model: An evidence-based child maltreatment prevention program. Behavior Modification, 32(5), 736–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445508317137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershater-Molko, R. M., Lutzker, J. R., & Wesch, D. (2003). Project SafeCare: Improving health, safety, and parenting skills in families reported for, and at-risk for child maltreatment. Journal of Family Violence, 18(6), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026219920902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, W. B., Dodge, K. A., Bai, Y., Murphy, R. A., & O’Donnell, K. (2021). Effect of a universal postpartum nurse home visiting program on child maltreatment and emergency medical care at 5 years of age: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 4(7), e2116024. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, W. B., Dodge, K. A., Bai, Y., Murphy, R. A., & O’Donnell, K. (2022). Implementation and impact evaluation of a dissemination of Family Connects to four high-poverty rural counties. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 26(5), 1067–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03297-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, W. B., Dodge, K. A., Bai, Y., O’Donnell, K., & Murphy, R. A. (2019). Randomized controlled trial of Family Connects: Effects on child emergency medical care from birth – 24 months. Development and Psychopathology, 31(5), 1863–1872. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579419000889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, K., Galano, J., Martin, J., Huntington, L., & Schellenbach, C. J. (2007). Healthy Families America® effectiveness: A comprehensive review of outcomes. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 34, 149–179. https://doi.org/10.1300/J005v34n01_08CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempe, C., H., Silverman, F. N., Steele, B. F., Droegemuller, W., & Silver, H. K. (1962). The battered child syndrome. JAMA, 181(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1962.03050270019004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitzman, H., Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Hanks, C., Cole, R., Tatelbaum, R., … & Barnard, K. (1997). Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 278(8), 644–652. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550080054039CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Home Visiting Resource Center. (2021). 2021 home visiting yearbook. James Bell Associates and the Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Olds, D. L. (2006). The Nurse-Family Partnership: An evidence-based preventive intervention. Infant Mental Health Journal, 27(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.20077CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olds, D. L., Eckenrode, J., Henderson, C. R., Kitzman, H., Powers, J., Cole, R., … & Luckey, D. (1997). Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect: Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial. JAMA, 278(8), 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550080047038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R. Jr, & Kitzman, H. (1994). Does prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation have enduring effects on qualities of parental caregiving and child health at 25 to 50 months of life? Pediatrics, 93(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.93.1.89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olds, D. L., Kitzman, H., Hanks, C., Cole, R., Anson, E., Sidora-Arcoleo, K., … & Bondy, J. (2007). Effects of nurse home visiting on maternal and child functioning: Age-9 follow-up of a randomized trial. Pediatrics, 120(4), e832–e845. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-2111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olds, D. L., Robinson, J., O’Brien, R., Luckey, D. W., Pettitt, L. M., Henderson, C. R. Jr, … & Talmi, A. (2002). Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics, 110(3), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.3.486CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrish, R. (1996). Battered child syndrome: Investigating physical abuse and homicide. United States Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/161406.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pfannenstiel, J., & Seltzer, D. (1985). Evaluation report: New Parents as Teachers project. Research & Training Associates.Google Scholar
PUBLIC LAW 111–148—March 23, 2010 Subtitle L—Maternal and Child Health Services Section 2951. Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Programs.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1992). Statebuilding for mothers and babies: the Children’s Bureau and the Sheppard-Towner Act. In Skocpol, T. (Ed), Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States (pp. 480–524). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674043725-015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolan, P.H., & Dodge, K. A. (2005). Children’s mental health as a primary care and concern: A system for comprehensive support and service. American Psychologist, 60, 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, M. M., & Clayton, S. L. (1999). The Parents As Teachers program: Results from two demonstrations. The Future of Children, 9(1), 91–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602723CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, M., & McDonald, D. (1997). Parents as Teachers: Investing in good beginnings for children. In Albee, G. & Gullotta, T. (Eds), Primary prevention works (pp. 119–145). Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Anderson, K. G. (2010). Life expectancy and the timing of life history events in developing countries. Human Nature, 21, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. A., Duffy, D. L., Martin, N. G., & Visscher, P. M. (2007). Estimation of variance components for age at menarche in twin families. Behavior genetics, 37, 668–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ardissino, M., Slob, E. A., Carter, P., Rogne, T., Girling, J., Burgess, S., & Ng, F. S. (2023). Sex‐specific reproductive factors augment cardiovascular disease risk in women: A Mendelian randomization study. Journal of the American Heart Association, 12, e027933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnocky, S., Desrochers, J., Rotella, A., Albert, G., Hodges-Simeon, C., Locke, A., … & Kelly, B. (2021). Men’s mate value correlates with a less restricted sociosexual orientation: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50, 3663–3673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baams, L., Dubas, J. S., Overbeek, G., & Van Aken, M. A. (2015). Transitions in body and behavior: A meta-analytic study on the relationship between pubertal development and adolescent sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56, 586–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barban, N., Jansen, R., De Vlaming, R., Vaez, A., Mandemakers, J. J., Tropf, F. C., … & Hopper, J. (2016). Genome-wide analysis identifies 12 loci influencing human reproductive behavior. Nature Genetics, 48, 1462–1472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batres, C., & Perrett, D. I. (2016). Early menarche is associated with preference for masculine male faces and younger preferred age to have a first child. Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 1474704916637876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behboudi-Gandevan, S., Moe, C. F., Skjesol, I., Arntzen, E. C., & Bidhendi-Yarandi, R. (2024). The J shaped association of age at menarche and cardiovascular events: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 14, 2695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J. (2007). Experience in childhood and the development of reproductive strategies. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 454–468.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. (2012). The development of human reproductive strategies: Progress and prospects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 310–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J. (2019). Early-life adversity accelerates child and adolescent development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J. (in press). The nature of nurture. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Schlomer, G. L., & Ellis, B. J. (2012). Beyond cumulative risk: Distinguishing harshness and unpredictability as determinants of parenting and early life history strategy. Developmental Psychology, 48, 662–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal de- velopment, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., Houts, R. M., Halpern-Felsher, B. L., & NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2010). The development of reproductive strategy in females: Early maternal harshness → earlier menarche → increased sexual risk taking. Developmental Psychology, 46, 120–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, C. J., Figueredo, A. J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2017). Substance, history, and politics: An examination of the conceptual underpinnings of alternative approaches to the life history narrative. Evolutionary Psychology, 15, 1474704916670402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolund, E. (2020). The challenge of measuring trade-offs in human life history research. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41, 502–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1989). Early maturing Kipsigis women have higher reproductive success than late maturing women and cost more to marry. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 24, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2009). Serial monogamy as polygyny or polyandry? Human Nature, 20, 130–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Ross, C. T. (2019). Unpacking mating success and testing Bateman’s principles in a human population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 286, 20191516.Google Scholar
Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Towner, M. C., Baldini, R., Beheim, B. A., Bowles, S., Colleran, H., … & Scelza, B. A. (2019). Differences between sons and daughters in the intergenerational transmission of wealth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 374, 20180076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braendle, C., Heyland, F., & Flatt, T. (2011). Integrating mechanistic and evolutionary analysis of life history variation. In Flatt, T., & Heyland, F. (Eds), Mechanisms of life history evolution. The genetics and physiology of life history traits and trade-offs (pp. 3–10). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulley, A., & Pepper, G. V. (2017). Cross-country relationships between life expectancy, intertemporal choice and age at first birth. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 652–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton Jones, N. (2016). Demography and evolutionary ecology of Hadza hunter-gatherers. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, M. D., Mendle, J., & Harden, K. P. (2014). Early adverse environments and genetic influences on age at first sex: Evidence for gene × environment interaction. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1532–1542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charalampopoulos, D., McLoughlin, A., Elks, C. E., & Ong, K. K. (2014). Age at menarche and risks of all-cause and cardiovascular death: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 180, 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, J. S. (1993). Death, hope, and sex: Life-history theory and the development of reproductive strategies. Current Anthropology, 34, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, J. S. (1999). Death, hope, and sex: Steps to an evolutionary ecology of mind and morality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. A., Durbin, C. E., Iacono, W. G., McGue, M., & Hicks, B. M. (2021). personality and sexual development in adolescence: Selection, corresponsive effects, and genetic and environmental influences. PsyArXiv, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/s92c3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colich, N. L., Rosen, M. L., Williams, E. S., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2020). Biological aging in childhood and adolescence following experiences of threat and deprivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146, 721–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copping, L. T., Campbell, A., & Muncer, S. (2014a). Conceptualizing time preference: A life-history analysis. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 829–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copping, L. T., Campbell, A., & Muncer, S. (2014b). Psychometrics and life history strategy: The structure and validity of the high K strategy scale. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 200–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copping, L. T., & Richardson, G. B. (2020). Studying sex differences in psychosocial life history indicators. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6, 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, S., Courtiol, A., Lummaa, V., Moorad, J., & Stearns, S. (2018). The transition to modernity and chronic disease: Mismatch and natural selection. Nature Reviews Genetics, 19, 419–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creswell, K. G., Wright, A. G., Flory, J. D., Skrzynski, C. J., & Manuck, S. B. (2019). Multidimensional assessment of impulsivity-related measures in relation to ex- ternalizing behaviors. Psychological Medicine, 49, 1678–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Giudice, M. (2018). Evolutionary psychopathology: A unified approach. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2020). Rethinking the fast-slow continuum of individual differences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41, 536–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2021). Are we comparing apples or squared apples? The proportion of explained variance exaggerates differences between effects. OpenPsych. https://doi.org/10.26775/OP.2021.06.15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2023a). A general motivational architecture for human and animal personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 144, 104967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Giudice, M. (2023b). Motivation, emotion, and personality: Steps to an evolutionary synthesis. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3ry7bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Giudice, M., & Belsky, J. (2010). Sex differences in attachment emerge in middle childhood: An evolutionary hypothesis. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Giudice, M., & Belsky, J. (2011). The development of life history strategies: Toward a multi-stage theory. In Buss, D. M. & Hawley, P. H. (Eds), The evolution of personality and individual differences (pp. 154–176). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2015). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In Buss, D. M. (Ed), The handbook of evolutionary psychology – Vol 1: Foundations (pp. 88–114, 2nd ed.). Wiley.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M., & Haltigan, J. D. (2023). An integrative evolutionary framework for psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 35, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denissen, J. J., & Penke, L. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the five-factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1285–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinh, T., & Gangestad, S. W. (2024). Mating fast and slow? Sociosexual orientations are not reflective of life history trajectories. Evolution and Human Behavior, 45, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinh, T., Haselton, M. G., & Gangestad, S. W. (2022). “Fast” women? The effects of childhood environments on women’s developmental timing, mating strategies, and reproductive outcomes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). The mating system of callitrichid primates: I. Conditions for the coevolution of pair bonding and twinning. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1057–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. J. (2004). Timing of pubertal maturation in girls: An integrated life history approach. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 920–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. J., Reid, B. M., & Kramer, K. L. (in preparation). Two tiers, not one: Different sources of extrinsic mortality have opposing effects on life history traits.Google Scholar
Frankenhuis, W. E., & Nettle, D. (2020). Current debates in human life history research. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41, 469–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 201–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fromonteil, S., Marie-Orleach, L., Winkler, L., & Janicke, T. (2023). Sexual selection in females and the evolution of polyandry. PLoS Biology, 21, e3001916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galizzi, M. M., & Navarro-Martínez, D. (2018). On the external validity of social preference games: A systematic lab-field study. Management Science, 65, 976–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, D. J., Geerkens, J. T., & Martin, M. A. (2022). Psychosocial and energetic factors on human female pubertal timing: A systematized review. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 4, e28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, M. J., Estioko-Griffin, A., Griffin, P. B., & Grove, J. S. (1985). Menarche, pregnancy, birth spacing and menopause among the Agta women foragers of Cagayan Province, Luzon, the Philippines. Annals of Human Biology, 12, 169–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutiérrez, F., Peri, J. M., Baillès, E., Sureda, B., Gárriz, M., Vall, G., … & Ruiz Rodríguez, J. (2022). A double-track pathway to fast strategy in humans and its personality correlates. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 889730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartemink, N., & Caswell, H. (2018). Variance in animal longevity: Contributions of heterogeneity and stochasticity. Population Ecology, 60, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartman, S., Sung, S., Simpson, J. A., Schlomer, G. L., & Belsky, J. (2018). Decomposing environmental unpredictability in forecasting adolescent and young adult development: A two-sample study. Development and Psychopathology, 30, 1321–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hochberg, Z. E., Gawlik, A., & Walker, R. S. (2011). Evolutionary fitness as a function of pubertal age in 22 subsistence-based traditional societies. International journal of pediatric endocrinology, 2011, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollis, B., Day, F. R., Busch, A. S., Thompson, D. J., Soares, A. L. G., Timmers, P. R., … & Wilson, C. H. (2020). Genomic analysis of male puberty timing highlights shared genetic basis with hair colour and lifespan. Nature Communications, 11, 1536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holtzman, N. S., & Strube, M. J. (2013). Above and beyond short-term mating, long-term mating is uniquely tied to human personality. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 147470491301100514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hur, Y. M., Jin, H. J., & Lee, S. (2019). Heritability of age at menarche in South Korean female twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 22, 183–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ibitoye, M., Choi, C., Tai, H., Lee, G., & Sommer, M. (2017). Early menarche: A systematic review of its effect on sexual and reproductive health in low-and middle-income countries. PLoS One, 12, e0178884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, J., & Ellis, B. J. (2013). The development of human reproductive strategies: Toward an integration of life history and sexual selection models. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 771–794). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, J. H. (2015). Resource transfers and life history evolution. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson Linnér, R., Mallard, T. T., Barr, P. B., Sanchez-Roige, S., Madole, J. W., Driver, M. N., … & Dick, D. M. (2021). Multivariate analysis of 1.5 million people identifies genetic associations with traits related to self-regulation and addiction. Nature Neuroscience, 24, 1367–1376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, K. M., Blomberg, S. P., Duffy, D. L., Heath, A. C., Owens, I. P., & Martin, N. G. (2001). Natural selection and quantitative genetics of life‐history traits in western women: A twin study. Evolution, 55, 423–435.Google ScholarPubMed
Kwon, E., Aalsma, M. C., Zapolski, T. C., Monahan, P. O., & Hulvershorn, L. (2023). Impulsivity as a predictor of early dating initiation in 11–12-year-old youth. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52, 1435–1443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawn, R. B., Sallis, H. M., Wootton, R. E., Taylor, A. E., Demange, P., Fraser, A., … & Munafò, M. R. (2020). The effects of age at menarche and first sexual intercourse on reproductive and behavioural outcomes: a Mendelian randomization study. PLoS One, 15, e0234488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeman, R. F., Rowland, B. H., Gebru, N. M., & Potenza, M. N. (2018). Relationships among impulsive, addictive and sexual tendencies and behaviours: A systematic re- view of experimental and prospective studies in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 374, 20180129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Z., Ma, H., Song, Q., Sun, D., Zhou, T., Heianza, Y., … & Qi, L. (2021). Joint associations of actual age and genetically determined age at menarche with risk of mortality. JAMA Network Open, 4, e2115297–e2115297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Guzman, S., Konova, A. B., Louie, K., & Glimcher, P. W. (2018). Risk preferences impose a hidden distortion on measures of choice impulsivity. PLoS One, 13, e0191357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, B. S., Parker, N., Hazel, A., & Welch, K. B. (2013). Life expectancy, fertility, and women’s lives: A life-history perspective. Cross-Cultural Research, 47, 198–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lozano-Esparza, S., Jansen, E. C., Hernandez-Ávila, J. E., Zamora-Muñoz, S., Stern, D., & Lajous, M. (2021). Menarche characteristics in association with total and cause-specific mortality: A prospective cohort study of Mexican teachers. Annals of Epidemiology, 62, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magnus, M. C., Guyatt, A. L., Lawn, R. B., Wyss, A. B., Trajanoska, K., Küpers, L. K., … & Fraser, A. (2020). Identifying potential causal effects of age at menarche: a Mendelian randomization phenome-wide association study. BMC Medicine, 18, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manson, J. H. (2017). Are extraversion and openness indicators of a slow life history strategy? Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 552–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson, J. H., & Kruger, D. J. (2022). Network analysis of psychometric life history indicators. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43, 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlowe, F. (2001). Male contribution to diet and female reproductive success among foragers. Current Anthropology, 42, 755–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. S., Ringen, E. J., Duda, P., & Jaeggi, A. V. (2020). Harsh environments promote alloparental care across human societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 287, 20200758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Međedović, J. (2021). Phenotypic signals of sexual selection and fast life history dynamics for the long-term but not short-term mating. Evolutionary Psychology, 19, 14747049211057158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Međedović, J. (2022). The position of body mass in a network of human life history indicators. Psihologijske Teme, 31, 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mike, A., King, H., Oltmanns, T. F., & Jackson, J. J. (2018). Obsessive, compulsive, and conscientious? The relationship between OCPD and personality traits. Journal of Personality, 86, 952–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, M. C., Tropf, F. C., Brazel, D. M., van Zuydam, N., Vaez, eQTLGen Consortium… & Zhao, J. H. (2021). Identification of 371 genetic variants for age at first sex and birth linked to externalising behaviour. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 1717–1730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mõttus, R., Allik, J., & Realo, A. (2010). An attempt to validate national mean scores of Conscientiousness: No necessarily paradoxical findings. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 630–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, C. M., Stanton, M. A., Lonsdorf, E. V., Wroblewski, E. E., & Pusey, A. E. (2016). Chimpanzee fathers bias their behaviour towards their offspring. Royal Society Open Science, 3, 160441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nettle, D., & Frankenhuis, W. E. (2019). The evolution of life-history theory: A bibliometric analysis of an interdisciplinary research area. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 286, 20190040.Google ScholarPubMed
Nettle, D., & Pollet, T. V. (2008). Natural selection on male wealth in humans. The American Naturalist, 172, 658–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olesen, T. B., Jensen, K. E., Nygård, M., Tryggvadottir, L., Sparén, P., Hansen, B. T., … & Kjær, S. K. (2012). Young age at first intercourse and risk-taking behaviours—a study of nearly 65000 women in four Nordic countries. European Journal of Public Health, 22, 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padrutt, E. R., Harper, J., Schaefer, J. D., Nelson, K. M., McGue, M., Iacono, W. G., & Wilson, S. (2023). Pubertal timing and adolescent outcomes: Investigating explanations for associations with a genetically informed design. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64, 1232–1241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pascual, J., García‐Moro, C. E., & Hernández, M. (2005). Biological and behavioral determinants of fertility in Tierra del Fuego. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 127, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peipert, J. F., Zhao, Q., Meints, L., Peipert, B. J., Redding, C. A., & Allsworth, J. E. (2011). Adherence to dual-method contraceptive use. Contraception, 84, 252–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Placek, C. D., & Quinlan, R. J. (2012). Adolescent fertility and risky environments: A population-level perspective across the lifespan. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 279, 4003–4008.Google ScholarPubMed
Pollet, T. V., Tybur, J. M., Frankenhuis, W. E., & Rickard, I. J. (2014). What can cross-cultural correlations teach us about human nature? Human Nature, 25, 410–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prati, G., & Tomasetto, C. (2022). Early pubertal development and deviant behavior: A three-year longitudinal study among early adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 193, 111621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, C., Sharp, G. C., Howe, L. D., Fraser, A., & Richmond, R. C. (2022). The relationships between women’s reproductive factors: A Mendelian randomisation analysis. BMC Medicine, 20, 103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provenzano, D. A., Dane, A. V., Farrell, A. H., Marini, Z. A., & Volk, A. A. (2018). Do bullies have more sex? The role of personality. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, R. J. (2006). Human parental effort and environmental risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, R. J., & Quinlan, M. B. (2007). Evolutionary ecology of human pair-bonds: Cross-cultural tests of alternative hypotheses. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raj, A., Ghule, M., Nair, S., Saggurti, N., Balaiah, D., & Silverman, J. G. (2015). Age at menarche, education, and child marriage among young wives in rural Maharashtra, India. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 131, 103–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiches, M. W. (2019). Adolescence as a biocultural life history transition. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, G. B., Barbaro, N., Nedelec, J. L., & Liu, H. (2023). Testing environmental effects on age at menarche and sexual debut within a genetically informative twin design. Human Nature, 34, 324–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, G. B., Bates, D., Ross, A., Liu, H., & Boutwell, B. B. (2024). Is reproductive development adaptively calibrated to early experience? Evidence from a national sample of females. Developmental Psychology, 60, 306–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, G. B., Placek, C., Srinivas, V., Jayakrishna, P., Quinlan, R., & Madhivanan, P. (2020). Environmental stress and human life history strategy development in rural and peri-urban South India. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41, 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond‐Rakerd, L. S., Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D. W., Connor, J., Corcoran, D. L., … & Caspi, A. (2020). A polygenic score for age‐at‐first‐birth predicts disinhibition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61, 1349–1359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roff, D. A., & Fairbairn, D. J. (2007). The evolution of trade-offs: Where are we? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 433–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenbaum, S., & Silk, J. B. (2022). Pathways to paternal care in primates. Evolutionary Anthropology, 31, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rottenstreich, M., Loitner, L., Dar, S., Kedem, R., Smorgick, N., & Vaknin, Z. (2017). Unintended pregnancies among women serving in the Israeli military. Contraception, 96, 62–65.Google ScholarPubMed
SadrAzar, A., Sanaie, S., Tutunchi, H., Sheikh, B., Faramarzi, E., & Jourabchi-Ghadim, N. (2023). Is early age at menarche associated with multimorbidity? Findings from the Azar Cohort Study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 287, 46–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Šaffa, G., Kubicka, A. M., Hromada, M., & Kramer, K. L. (2019). Is the timing of menarche correlated with mortality and fertility rates? PLoS One, 14, e0215462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scelza, B. A. (2013). Choosy but not chaste: Multiple mating in human females. Evolutionary Anthropology, 22, 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sear, R. (2020). Do human ‘life history strategies’ exist? Evolution and Human Behavior, 41, 513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibly, R. M., Witt, C. C., Wright, N. A., Venditti, C., Jetz, W., & Brown, J. H. (2012). Energetics, lifestyle, and reproduction in birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 10937–10941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, R. E., & Ellner, S. P. (2018). Pluck or luck: Does trait variation or chance drive variation in lifetime reproductive success? The American Naturalist, 191, E90–E107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Städele, V., Vigilant, L., Strum, S. C., & Silk, J. B. (2021). Extended male–female bonds and potential for prolonged paternal investment in a polygynandrous primate (Papio anubis). Animal Behaviour, 174, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stifani, B. M., Plagianos, M., Vieira, C. S., & Merkatz, R. B. (2018). Factors associated with nonadherence to instructions for using the Nestorone®/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring. Contraception, 97, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tielbeek, J. J., Barnes, J. C., Popma, A., Polderman, T. J., Lee, J. J., Perry, J. R., … & Boutwell, B. B. (2018). Exploring the genetic correlations of antisocial behaviour and life history traits. BJPsych Open, 4, 467–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Towne, B., Czerwinski, S. A., Demerath, E. W., Blangero, J., Roche, A. F., & Siervogel, R. M. (2005). Heritability of age at menarche in girls from the Fels Longitudinal Study. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 128, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tropf, F. C., Barban, N., Mills, M. C., Snieder, H., & Mandemakers, J. J. (2015). Genetic influence on age at first birth of female twins born in the UK, 1919–68. Population Studies, 69, 129–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van de Walle, J., Fay, R., Gaillard, J. M., Pelletier, F., Hamel, S., Gamelon, M., … & Jenouvrier, S. (2023). Individual life histories: neither slow nor fast, just diverse. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 290, 20230511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Rheenen, W., Peyrot, W. J., Schork, A. J., Lee, S. H., & Wray, N. R. (2019). Genetic correlations of polygenic disease traits: From theory to practice. Nature Reviews Genetics, 20, 567–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venables, N. C., Foell, J., Yancey, J. R., Kane, M. J., Engle, R. W., & Patrick, C. J. (2018). Quantifying inhibitory control as externalizing proneness: A cross-domain model. Clinical Psychological Science, 6, 561–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, A. A. (2023). Historical and hunter-gatherer perspectives on fast-slow life history strategies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 44, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Rueden, C. R., & Jaeggi, A. V. (2016). Men’s status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 113, 10824–10829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voors, M., Turley, T., Kontoleon, A., Bulte, E., & List, J. A. (2012). Exploring whether behavior in context-free experiments is predictive of behavior in the field: Evidence from lab and field experiments in rural Sierra Leone. Economics Letters, 114, 308–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, M., Heath, A. C., Turkheimer, E., Emery, R., Bucholz, K. K., Madden, P. A., & Martin, N. G. (2007). Age at first sexual intercourse and teenage pregnancy in Australian female twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10, 440–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winking, J., & Koster, J. (2015). The fitness effects of men’s family investments: A test of three pathways in a single population. Human Nature, 26, 292–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodley of Menie, M. A., Cabeza de Baca, T., Fernandes, H. B. F., Madison, G., Figueredo, A. J., & Peñaherrera Aguirre, M. (2017). Slow and steady wins the race: K positively predicts fertility in the USA and Sweden. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, P. C. (1990). Patterns of paternal care in primates. International Journal of Primatology, 11, 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Balliet, D., Tybur, J. M., Arai, S., Van Lange, P. A., & Yamagishi, T. (2017). Life history strategy and human cooperation in economic games. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, Y., Lu, H., Lin, S., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Reproductive factors and risk of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in American women: NHANES 2003–2018. BMC Women’s Health, 24, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, L., Li, L., Millwood, I. Y., Peters, S. A., Chen, Y., Guo, Y., … & China Kadoorie Biobank Study Collaborative Group. (2017). Age at menarche and risk of major cardiovascular diseases: evidence of birth cohort effects from a prospective study of 300,000 Chinese women. International Journal of Cardiology, 227, 497–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaitlen, N., Kraft, P., Patterson, N., Pasaniuc, B., Bhatia, G., Pollack, S., & Price, A. L. (2013). Using extended genealogy to estimate components of heritability for 23 quantitative and dichotomous traits. PLoS Genetics, 9, e1003520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Z., Ma, P., Li, Q., Xiao, Q., Sun, H., Olasege, B. S., … & Pan, Y. (2018). Exploring the genetic correlation between growth and immunity based on summary statistics of genome-wide association studies. Frontiers in Genetics, 9, 411832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zietsch, B. P., & Sidari, M. J. (2020). A critique of life history approaches to human trait covariation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41, 527–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Aron, E. N. (2004, Jun). Revisiting Jung’s concept of innate sensitiveness. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 49(3), 337–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997, Aug). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345–368. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9248053CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. (2012, Aug). Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311434213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Assary, E., Vincent, J., Machlitt-Northen, S., Keers, R., & Pluess, M. (2020). The Role of gene-environment interaction in mental health and susceptibility to the development of psychiatric disorders. In Teperino, R. (Ed), Beyond Our Genes: Pathophysiology of Gene and Environment Interaction and Epigenetic Inheritance (pp. 117–138). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35213-4_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J. (1997a, Aug). Theory testing, effect-size evaluation, and differential susceptibility to rearing influence: The case of mothering and attachment. Child Development, 68(4), 598–600. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9306638CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J. (1997b). Variation in susceptibility to rearing influences: An evolutionary argument. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 182–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J. (2005). Differential susceptibility to rearing influences: An evolutionary hypothesis and some evidence. In Ellis, B. & Bjorklund, D. (Eds), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp. 139–163). Guilford.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007, Dec). For better and for worse: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00525.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J., Hsieh, K.-H., & Crnic, K. (1998). Mothering, fathering, and infant negativity as antecedents of boys’ externalizing problems and inhibition at age 3 years: Differential susceptibility to rearing experience? Development and Psychopathology, 10(2), 301–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009, Nov). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 885–908. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017376CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2013, Nov). Beyond risk, resilience, and dysregulation: Phenotypic plasticity and human development. Development and Psychopathology, 25(4 Pt 2), 1243–1261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457941300059XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2016). Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. In Cicchetti, D. (Ed), Developmental Psychopathology (3rd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 59). Wiley.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Pluess, M., & Widaman, K. F. (2013, Oct). Confirmatory and competitive evaluation of alternative gene-environment interaction hypotheses. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 54(10), 1135–1143. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12075CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991, Aug). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62(4), 647–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., Zhang, X., & Sayler, K. (2022). Differential susceptibility 2.0: Are the same children affected by different experiences and exposures? Development and Psychopathology, 34(3), 1025–1033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, W. T., Chesney, M., Alkon, A., Tschann, J. M., Adams, S., Chesterman, B., Cohen, F., Kaiser, P., Folkman, S., & Wara, D. (1995, Sep–Oct). Psychobiologic reactivity to stress and childhood respiratory illnesses: Results of two prospective studies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 57(5), 411–422. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8552730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005, Spring). Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary-developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology, 17(2), 271–301. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16761546CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, A. R. (1976, Jan). Galton and the birth of differential psychology and eugenics: social, political, and economic forces. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 12(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(197601)12:1<47::aid-jhbs2300120106>3.0.co;2-v3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M., & Greiling, H. (1999). Adaptive individual differences. Journal of Personality, 67(2), 209–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T. E., Taylor, A., Craig, I. W., Harrington, H., McClay, J., Mill, J., Martin, J., Braithwaite, A., & Poulton, R. (2003, Jul 18). Influence of life stress on depression: Moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science, 301(5631), 386–389. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1083968CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culverhouse, R. C., Saccone, N. L., Horton, A. C., Ma, Y., Anstey, K. J., Banaschewski, T., Burmeister, M., Cohen-Woods, S., Etain, B., & Fisher, H. L. (2018). Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression. Molecular Psychiatry, 23(1), 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, S. R., Bell, A. M., Bolnick, D. I., & Ratnieks, F. L. (2012, Oct). An evolutionary ecology of individual differences. Ecol Lett, 15(10), 1189–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01846.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origins of the species by means of natural selection, or preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray: London.Google Scholar
Davidson, T., Braudt, D. B., Keers, R., Assary, E., Harris, K. M., & Boardman, J. D. (2021). Genome-wide stress sensitivity moderates the stress-depression relationship in a nationally representative sample of adults. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 20332–20332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98684-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. T., Hentges, R. F., Coe, J. L., Parry, L. Q., & Sturge-Apple, M. L. (2021, Aug). Children’s dove temperament as a differential susceptibility factor in child rearing contexts. Developmental Psychology, 57(8), 1274–1290. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Gucht, V., Woestenburg, D. H., & Wilderjans, T. F. (2022). The different faces of (high) sensitivity, toward a more comprehensive measurement instrument. Development and validation of the Sensory Processing Sensitivity Questionnaire (SPSQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(6), 784–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wolff, M. S., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1997, Aug). Sensitivity and attachment: a meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68(4), 571–591. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=9306636Google ScholarPubMed
Deater-Deckard, K., & Dodge, K. A. (1997). Externalizing behavior problems and discipline revisited: Nonlinear effects and variation by culture, context, and gender. Psychological Inquiry, 8(3), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2011, Feb). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23(01), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, D. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007, Aug). Developing a model for adult temperament. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 868–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1981). A model for personality. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gard, A. M., Shaw, D. S., Forbes, E. E., & Hyde, L. W. (2018, Dec). Amygdala reactivity as a marker of differential susceptibility to socioeconomic resources during early adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 54(12), 2341–2355. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000600CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldsmith, H. H., Reilly, J., Lemery, K. S., Longley, S., & Prescott, A. (1999). The Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery—Preschool Version (Technical Report).Google Scholar
Gottesman, II, & Shields, J. (1967, Jul). A polygenic theory of schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 58(1), 199–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8(3), 249–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gubler, D. A., Janelt, T., Roth, M., Schlegel, K., Guggisberg, J., & Troche, S. J. (2024). The DOES scale: Measuring sensory processing sensitivity as a trait constellation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2405536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, S., Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2023). Prenatal programming of environmental sensitivity. Translational psychiatry, 13(1), 161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartman, S., Freeman, S. M., Bales, K. L., & Belsky, J. (2018). Prenatal stress as a risk–and an opportunity–factor. Psychological Science, 29(4), 572–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, C. G. (1913). The theory of psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Review (1913–1957), 1, 1.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1921). Psychological types. The collected works of C.G. Jung, 6.Google Scholar
Kagan, J., Reznick, J. S., & Snidman, N. (1987, Dec). The physiology and psychology of behavioral inhibition in children. Child Development, 58(6), 1459–1473. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3691195CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keers, R., Coleman, J. R., Lester, K. J., Roberts, S., Breen, G., Thastum, M., Bögels, S., Schneider, S., Heiervang, E., & Meiser-Stedman, R. (2016). A genome-wide test of the differential susceptibility hypothesis reveals a genetic predictor of differential response to psychological treatments for child anxiety disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 85(3), 146–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, M. C., & Miller, G. (2006). Resolving the paradox of common, harmful, heritable mental disorders: Which evolutionary genetic models work best? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(4), 385–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lionetti, F., Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Burns, G. L., Jagiellowicz, J., & Pluess, M. (2018). Dandelions, tulips and orchids: Evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Translational psychiatry, 8(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0090-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lionetti, F., Aron, E. N., Aron, A., Klein, D. N., & Pluess, M. (2019, Nov). Observer-rated environmental sensitivity moderates children’s response to parenting quality in early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 55(11), 2389–2402. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000795CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manuck, S. B. (2011). Delay discounting covaries with childhood socioeconomic status as a function of genetic variation in the dopamine D4 Receptor (DRD4) Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Markovitch, N., Hart, Y., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2023). Environmental susceptibility for all: A data-driven approach suggests individual differences in domain-general and domain-specific patterns of environmental susceptibility. Development and Psychopathology, 1–17.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S., Best, K., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 425–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, A. K., Smeeth, D., McEwen, F., Karam, E., Rieder, M. J., Elzagallaai, A. A., van Uum, S., Lionetti, F., & Pluess, M. (2024). The role of environmental sensitivity in the mental health of Syrian refugee children: A multi-level analysis. Molecular Psychiatry, 29(10), 3170–3179. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02573-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNaughton, N., & Gray, J. A. (2000). Anxiolytic action on the behavioural inhibition system implies multiple types of arousal contribute to anxiety. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61(3), 161–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meehl, P. E. (1962). Schizotaxia, schizotypy, schizophrenia. American Psychologist, 17(12), 827–838. https://doi.org/doi:10.1037/h0041029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monroe, S. M., & Simons, A. D. (1991, Nov). Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: Implications for the depressive disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), 406–425. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1758917CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2001). Nonmaternal care and family factors in early development: An overview of the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 457–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., & Pluess, M. (2018, Nov). The personality trait of environmental sensitivity predicts children’s positive response to school-based antibullying intervention. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(6), 848–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618782194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluess, M. (2015). Individual Differences in Environmental Sensitivity. Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluess, M. (2017, Feb). Vantage sensitivity: environmental sensitivity to positive experiences as a function of genetic differences. Journal of Personality, 85(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluess, M., Aron, E., Kähkönen, J., Lionetti, F., Huang, Y., Tillmann, T., Greven, C., & Aron, A. (2024). Evolution of the concept of sensitivity and its measurement: The highly sensitive person scale-revised. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/w7bquCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K. J., Krapohl, E., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (2018, Jan). Environmental sensitivity in children: Development of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale and identification of sensitivity groups. Developmental Psychology, 54(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000406CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2011, Feb). Prenatal programming of postnatal plasticity? Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579410000623CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2013, Jul). Vantage sensitivity: Individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 901–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030196CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluess, M., De Brito, S. A., Bartoli, A. J., McCrory, E., & Viding, E. (2022a). Individual differences in sensitivity to the early environment as a function of amygdala and hippocampus volumes: An exploratory analysis in 12-year-old boys. Development and Psychopathology, 34(3), 901–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluess, M., Lionetti, F., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (2023). People differ in their sensitivity to the environment: An integrated theory, measurement and empirical evidence. Journal of Research in Personality, 104, 104377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluess, M., Rhoades, G., Keers, R., Knopp, K., Belsky, J., Markman, H., & Stanley, S. (2022b, Feb). Genetic sensitivity predicts long-term psychological benefits of a relationship education program for married couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 90(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000715CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluess, M., Stevens, S., & Belsky, J. (2013). Differential susceptibility: developmental and evolutionary mechanisms of gene-environment interactions. In Legerstee, M., Haley, D. W., & Bornstein, M. H. (Eds), The infant mind: Origins of the social brain (pp. 77–96). Guilford.Google Scholar
Roisman, G. I., Newman, D. A., Fraley, R. C., Haltigan, J. D., Groh, A. M., & Haydon, K. C. (2012). Distinguishing differential susceptibility from diathesis-stress: Recommendations for evaluating interaction effects. Development and Psychopathology, 24(2), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000065CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, M. K. (1981). Measurement of temperament in infancy. Child Development, 52(2), 569–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, M. (1979). Protective factors in children‘s responses to stress and disadvantage. In Kent, M. W. & Rolf, J. E. (Eds), Primary prevention of psychopathology (Vol. 3, pp. 49–74). University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (1987, Jul). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57(3), 316–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarr, S. (1992). Developmental theories for the 1990s: Development and individual differences. Child Development, 63(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperati, A., Spinelli, M., Fasolo, M., Pastore, M., Pluess, M., & Lionetti, F. (2022). Investigating sensitivity through the lens of parents: Validation of the parent-report version of the Highly Sensitive Child scale. Development and Psychopathology, 36(1), 415–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stamps, J. A. (2015, Apr 10). Individual differences in behavioural plasticities. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 91(2), 534–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sweitzer, M. M., Halder, I., Flory, J. D., Craig, A. E., Gianaros, P. J., Ferrell, R. E., & Manuck, S. B. (2013, Jun). Polymorphic variation in the dopamine D4 receptor predicts delay discounting as a function of childhood socioeconomic status: evidence for differential susceptibility. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(5), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Uher, R. (2009, Dec). The role of genetic variation in the causation of mental illness: An evolution-informed framework. Molecular Psychiatry, 14(12), 1072-1082. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2009.85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wachs, T. D., & Gandour, M. J. (1983, June). Temperament, environment, and six-month cognitive-intellectual development: A test of the organismic specificity hypothesis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 6(2), 135–152. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1984-00959-001&site=ehost-liveCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A study of resilient children. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Weyn, S., Lionetti, F., Klein, D. N., Aron, E., Aron, A., Hayden, E. P., Dougherty, L. R., Singh, S., Waszczuk, M., Kotov, R., Docherty, A., Shabalin, A., & Pluess, M. (2025). Observer-rated environmental sensitivity and its characterization at behavioral, genetic, and physiological levels. Development and Psychopathology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424001883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widaman, K. F., Helm, J. L., Castro-Schilo, L., Pluess, M., Stallings, M. C., & Belsky, J. (2012, Dec). Distinguishing ordinal and disordinal interactions. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, D. S., Clark, A. B., Coleman, K., & Dearstyne, T. (1994). Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. Trends in ecology & evolution, 9(11), 442–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Schlomer, G. L., Ellis, B. J., & Belsky, J. (2022). Environmental harshness and unpredictability: Do they affect the same parents and children? Development and Psychopathology, 34(2), 667–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zubin, J., & Spring, B. (1977, Apr). Vulnerability--a new view of schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(2), 103–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuckerman, M. (1999). Diathesis-stress models. In Zuckerman, M. (Ed), Vulnerability to psychopathology: A biosocial model American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

The PDF of this book conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×