Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-scsgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T08:33:21.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2025

Aistė Čelkytė
Aistė Čelkytė
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Galen on Human Physiology
Taking the Body Apart and Putting it Back Together Again
 , pp. 218 - 232
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adamson, P. 2014. ‘Galen on Void’. In Philosophical Themes in Galen, ed Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. and Wilberding, J.. Cambridge: Institute of Classical Studies: 197–211.Google Scholar
Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. and Wilberding, J. (eds.). 2014. Philosophical Themes in Galen. Cambridge: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Allen, J. 2001. Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198250944.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Arnim, J. (ed.). 1903–5. Stoicorum veterum fragmenta. 3 vols. Cambridge: Teubner.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1982. The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.). 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation . Cambridge: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1988. ‘Bits and Pieces’. In Matter and Metaphysics, ed. Barnes, J. and Mignucci, M.. Cambridge: Bibliopolis: 225–94.Google Scholar
Berman, B. 2015. ‘Aristotle on Like-Partedness and the Like-Parted Bodies’. Early Science and Medicine 20: 27–47.10.1163/15733823-00201p02CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berryman, S. 1997. ‘Horror Vacui in the Third Century BC: When Is a Theory Not a Theory?’ Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement no. 68: 147–57. Google Scholar
Berryman, S. 2002. ‘Aristotle on Pneuma and Animal Self-Motion’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 23: 85–97.10.1093/oso/9780199259083.003.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, S. 2009. The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betegh, G. 2019. ‘Fire Heat and Motive Force in Early Greek Philosophy and Medicine’. In Heat, Pneuma and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Science, ed. Bartos, H. and King, C. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 35–60.Google Scholar
Bett, R. 2012. Sextus Empiricus: ‘Against the Physicists’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139048811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, D. 2000. ‘Ammonius Hermeiou and His School’. In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, ed. Gerson, L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 654–66.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. 1998. ‘“Chrysippus” Theory of Causes’. In Topics in Stoic Philosophy, ed. Ierodiakonou, K.. Cambridge: Oxford University Press: 196–242.Google Scholar
de Boer, W. 1937. De propriorum animi cuiuslibet affectuum dignotione et curatione, De animi cuiuslibet peccatorum dignotione et curatione and De atra bile, CMG V 4, 1, 1. Cambridge: AkademieVerlag.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. 2016. ‘The Perfidious Strategy; or, the Platonists against Stoicism’ In Strategies of Polemics in Greek and Roman Philosophy, ed. Weisser, S. and Thaler, N.. Cambridge: Brill: 166–84.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. (ed.). 2000. Galien. Tome ii: Exhortation à l’étude de la médecine; Art médical. Cambridge: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2007. Galien, Tome 1, Introduction générale. Sur l’ Ordre des ses propres Livres. Sur ses propres Livres. Que l’ excellent Médecin est aussi Philosophe. Cambridge: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. 2012. ‘Vision and Vision Disorders: Galen’s Physiology of Sight’. In Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe, ed. Horstmanshoff, H., King, H. and Zittel, C.. Cambridge: Brill: 551–68.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V., and Pietrobelli, A. (eds.). 2005. ‘Galien ressuscité: édition princeps du texte Grec du De Propriis Placitis’. Revue des Etudes Grecques 118: 168–213.10.3406/reg.2005.4610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouras-Vallianatos, P., and Zipser, B.. (eds.). 2019. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Galen. Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789004394353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. (ed.). 1974. Approaches to the Second Sophistic: Papers Presented at the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Philological Association. Cambridge: American Philological Association, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Boylan, M. 1984. ‘The Galenic and Hippocratic Challenges to Aristotle’s Conception Theory’. Journal of the History of Biology 17(1): 83–112.10.1007/BF00397503CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boylan, M. 1986. ‘Galen’s Conception Theory’. Journal of the History of Biology 19(1): 47–77.10.1007/BF00346617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. 2018. Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to AD 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brain, P. 1986. Galen on Bloodletting: A Study of the Origins, Development and Validity of His Opinions, with a Translation of the Three Works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511753565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadie, S. 1987. ‘Nature, Craft and Phronesis in Aristotle’. Philosophical Topics 15(2): 35–50.10.5840/philtopics19871523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadie, S. 2007. ‘Why No Platonistic Ideas of Artefacts?’ In Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat, ed. Scott, D.. Cambridge: Oxford University Press: 232–53.Google Scholar
Brock, A. J. 1916. Galen: On the Natural Faculties. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brunschön, C. W. 2021. Galeni De locis affectis V–VI, CMG V 6, 1, 3. Cambridge: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Caston, V. 1997. ‘Epiphenomenalism, Ancient and Modern’. The Philosophical Review 106(3): 309–63.10.2307/2998397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Čelkytė, A. 2020a. ‘The Soul and Personal Identity in Early Stoicism: Two Theories?’ Apeiron 53(4): 463–86.10.1515/apeiron-2017-0038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Čelkytė, A. 2020b. The Stoic Theory of Beauty. Cambridge: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Čelkytė, A. 2023. ‘The Medico-Oikonomic Model of Human Nature in Bryson’s Oikonomikos’. Phronesis 68(2): 206–35.10.1163/15685284-bja10071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2009. ‘Galen and Middle Platonism’. In Galen and the World of Knowledge, ed. Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 243–60.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2014. ‘Galen on What Is Persuasive (Pithanon) and What Approximates to Truth’. In Philosophical Themes in Galen, ed. Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. and Wilberding, J.. Cambridge: Institute of Classical Studies: 61–88.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2015. ‘Plotinus’ Account of Demiurgic Causation and Its Philosophical Background’. In Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity, ed. Marmadoro, A. and Prince, B. D.. Cambridge: Oxford University Press: 31–50.10.1017/CBO9781107447974.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, S. 1975. Aristotle’s Man: Speculations upon Aristotelian Anthropology. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245162.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, S. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals: A Study of the Generation of Animals . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316479766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius, K., and Gregoric, P. 2013. ‘Aristotle’s Model of Animal Motio..’ Phronesis 58(1): 52–97.10.1163/15685284-12341242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughlin, S. 2020. ‘Cohesive Causes in Ancient Greek Philosophy and Medicin.’. In Holism in Ancient Medicine and Its Reception, ed. Thumiger, C.. Cambridge: Leiden: 237–67.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. 1997. The Anatomical Renaissance: The Resurrection of the Anatomical Projects of the Ancients. Cambridge: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. 2010. The Anatomists Anatomis’d: An Experimental Discipline in Enlightenment Europe . Cambridge: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A. 2003. ‘The Pen and the Sword: Recovering the Disciplinary Identity of Physiology and Anatomy before 1800 II: Old Anatomy – the Swor.’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34: 51–76.10.1016/S1369-8486(02)00069-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, A. 2002. ‘The Pen and the Sword: Recovering the Disciplinary Identity of Physiology and Anatomy before 1800 I: Old Physiology – the Pe.’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33: 631–65.10.1016/S1369-8486(02)00023-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curd, P. 1998. The Legacy of Parmenides: Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought. Cambridge: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, T. 2010. Rhetorical Strategies and Generic Conventions in the Galenic Corpus. PhD dissertation, Newcastle University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Daremberg, C., and Ruelle, C. É.. 1963 (1879). Oeuvres de Rufus d’Éphèse. Cambridge: Hakkert (original Paris: Imprimerie Nationale).Google Scholar
Das, A. 2020. Galen and the Arabic Reception of Plato’s “Timaeus”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108583107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debru, A. 1996. Le Corps Respirant. Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789004377387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debru, A. 1997. ‘Philosophie et Pharmacologie: La Dynamique des Substances Leptomeres Chez Gale.’. Galen on Pharmacology: Philosophy, History, and Medicine: Proceedings of the 5th International Galen Colloquium, Lille, 16–18 March 1995, ed. Debru, A.. Cambridge: Brill: 85–102.10.1163/9789004377431_005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debru, A. 2008. ‘Physiolog.’. In The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. Hankinson, R. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 263–82.Google Scholar
Destrée, P. 2007. ‘Aristotle on the Causes of Akrasia ’. In Akrasia in Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Brill: 139–65.Google Scholar
Devinant, J. 2020. Les troubles psychiques selon Galien: Étude d’un système de pensée. Cambridge: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Diels, H. 1893. ‘Uber das physikalische System des Strato.’. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 12: 101–27.Google Scholar
Diels, H., and Kranz, W (eds.). 1951–2. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 6th edn. 3 vols. Cambridge: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Diller, H. 1999. Hippocratis De aere aquis locis, CMG I 1, 2. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Donini, P. 2008. ‘Psycholog.’. The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. Hankinson, R. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 184–209.10.1017/CCOL9780521819541.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, W. L. H. (tr.). 1962. Galen on Anatomical Procedures, the Later Books, ed. Lyons, M. C. and Towers, B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duncombe, M. 2015. ‘The Role of Relatives in Plato’s Partition Argument, Republic 4, 436b9–439c.’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48: 37–60.Google Scholar
Durling, R. J. 1988. ‘The Innate Heat in Gale.’. Medizinhistorisches Journal 23(3/4): 210–12.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 1997. ‘Galen’s Use of the Concept of “Qualified Experience” in His Dietetic and Pharmacological Work.’. In Galen on Pharmacology: Philosophy, History, and Medicine, ed. Debru, A.. Cambridge: Brill: 35–57.10.1163/9789004377431_003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2000–1. Diocles of Carystus: A Collection of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary . 2 vols. Cambridge: Brill.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2005. Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity: Doctors and Philosophers on Nature, Soul, Health and Disease. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511482670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2009. ‘Aristotle! What a Thing for You to Say!’ Galen’s Engagement with Aristotle and Aristotelian.’. In Galen and the World of Knowledge, ed. Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 261–81.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2014. ‘Galen on the Nature of Human Being.’. In Philosophical Themes in Galen, ed. Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. and Wilberding, J.. Cambridge: Institute of Classical Studies: 89–134.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2017. ‘The Place of Disease in a Teleological World-view: Plato, Aristotle, Gale.’. In Teleology in the Ancient World: Philosophical and Medical Approaches, ed. Rocca, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 217–41.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. 2020. ‘Galen on Soul, Mixture, Pneum.’. In Body and Soul in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Inwood, B. and Warren, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 62–88.10.1017/9781108641487.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcon, A. 2021. ‘The Reception of Aristotle’s Biology in Late Antiquity and Beyon.’. In The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology, ed. Connell, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 246–60.Google Scholar
Flemming, R. 2000. Medicine and the Making of Roman Women: Gender, Nature, and Authority from Celsus to Galen. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199240029.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortuna, S. 1997. Galeni de Constitutione Artis Medicae ad Patrophilum, CMG V 1, 3. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1987. Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J., and Wilkie, J. S.. 1984. Galen: On Respiration and the Arteries. Cambridge: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400855155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garofalo, I. 1991. Procedimenti anatomici. Cambridge: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Garofalo, I., and Lami, A. 2012 Galeno, l’anima e il dolore. De Indolentia; De Propriis Placitis. Cambridge: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Gärtner, F. 2015. Galenus. De locis affectis I–II. Cambridge: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gelber, J. 2010. ‘Form and Inheritance in Aristotle’s Embryolog.’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 183–212.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L. 2007. Democrito e l’Accademia: studi sulla trasmissione dell’atomismo antico da Aristotele a Simplicio . Cambridge: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110912722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. J. 2006. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198152682.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. J. 2010. Naturalistic Psychology in Galen and Stoicism. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, C. J., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J. (eds.). 2009. Galen and the World of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glare, P. (ed.). 1982. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. 2012. Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199287956.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. 1987. ‘Aristotelian philosophy in the Roman world from the time of Cicero to the end of the second century A..’ In Aufstieg Und Niedergang Der Römischen Welt. Tel Ii: Teilband: Philosophie (Platonismus (Fortsetzung) Aristotelismus) Band 36: Philosophie, Wissenschaften, Technik, ed. Haase, W.. Cambridge: De Gruyter: 1079–175.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. 2007. ‘ Akrasia and Enkrateia in Ancient Stoicism: Minor Vice and Minor Virtue.’ In Akrasia in Greek Philosophy, ed. Bobonich, C. and Destrée, P.. Cambridge: Brill: 215–47.Google Scholar
Grensemann, H. 1968. Die hippokratische Schrift ‘Über die heilige Krankheit’. Cambridge: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110820744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundert, B. 1992. ‘Parts and Their Roles in Hippocratic Medicin.’. Isis 83(3): 453–65.10.1086/356204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundert, B. 2000. ‘Soma and Psyche in Hippocratic Medicin.’. In Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind-Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment, ed. Wright, J. and Potter, P.. Cambridge: Oxford University Press: 13–35.10.1093/oso/9780198238409.003.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundert, B. 2009. Galeni De Symptomatum Differentiis, CMG V 5, 1. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.10.1524/9783050087979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1965. A History of Greek Philosophy: Vol. 2, The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. 1989. ‘Galen and the Best of All Possible World.’. The Classical Quarterly 39(1): 206–27.10.1017/S0009838800040593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. 1991a. ‘Galen’s Anatomy of the Sou.’. Phronesis 36(2): 197–233.10.1163/156852891321052787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. 1991b. ‘A Purely Verbal Dispute? Galen on Stoic and Academic Epistemolog.’. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 45(178(3)): 267–300.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. 1993. ‘Actions and Passions: Affection, Emotion, and Moral Self-Management in Galen’s Philosophical Psychology’. In Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, ed. Brunschwig, J and Nussbaum, M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 184–222.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. 1994. ‘Galen’s Theory of Causatio.’. ANRW II, 37(2): 1757–74.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. 1998. Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. 2003. ‘Causation in Gale.’. In Galien et la Philosophie Entretiens sur l’antiquite classique, vol. 49, ed. Barnes, J. and Jouanna, J.. Cambridge: Fondation Hardt: 31–72.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. 2006. ‘Body and Soul in Gale.’. In Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, ed. King, R. A. H.. Cambridge: De Gruyter: 232–58.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. 2008a. ‘Philosophy of Natur.’. In The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. Hankinson, R. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 210–41.10.1017/CCOL9780521819541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. 2008b. ‘The Man and His Wor.’. In The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. Hankinson, R. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–33.10.1017/CCOL9780521819541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. (ed.) 2008c. The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521819541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. 2009. ‘Galen on the Limitations of Knowledg.’. In Galen and The World of Knowledge, ed. Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 206–42.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. 2014. ‘Partitioning the Soul: Galen on the Anatomy of the Psychic Functions and Mental Illnes.’. In Partitioning the Soul: Debates from Plato to Leibniz, ed. Corcilius, K. and Perler, D.. Cambridge: De Gruyter: 85–106.10.1515/9783110311884.85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. 2016. ‘Galen’s Reception of Aristotl.’. In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, ed. Falcon, A.. Cambridge: Brill: 238–57.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. 2017a. ‘Substance, Element, Quality, Mixture: Galen’s Physics and His Hippocratic Inheritanc.’. Aitia 7(2).Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. 2017b. ‘Teleology and Necessity in Greek Embryolog.’. In Teleology in the Ancient World, ed. Rocca, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 242–71.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. 2022a. ‘Discovery, Method, and Justification: Galen and the Determination of Therap.’. In Galen’s Epistemology: Experience, Reason, and Method in Ancient Medicine, ed. Hankinson, R. and Havrda, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 79–115.10.1017/9781009072670.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. 2022b. ‘A Hymn to Nature: Structure, Function, Design and Beauty in Galen’s Biolog.’. In Poikile Physis: Biological Literature in Greek during the Roman Empire: Genres, Scopes, and Problems, ed. de Brasi, D. and Fronterotta, F.. Cambridge: De Gruyter: 145–66.Google Scholar
Harder, R. 1926. Ocellus Lucanus: Neue philologische Untersuchungen, vol. 1. Cambridge: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Hardie, R. P., and Gaye, R. K (tr.) 1984. ‘Aristotle’s Physics ’. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. Barnes, J.. Cambridge: Princeton University Press: 315–446.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. S. 1973. The Heart and the Vascular System in Ancient Greek Medicine: From Alcmaeon to Galen. Cambridge: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harte, V. 2002. Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. Cambridge: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0198236751.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havrda, M. 2015. ‘The Purpose of Galen’s Treatise On Demonstration ’. Early Science and Medicine 20: 265–87.10.1163/15733823-00203p03CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havrda, M. 2017. ‘Body and Cosmos in Galen’s Account of the Sou.’. Phronesis 62(1): 69–89.10.1163/15685284-12341319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helle, R. 2021. ‘Self-causation and Unity in Stoicis.’. Phronesis 66(2): 178–213.10.1163/15685284-BJA10038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiberg, J. L. 1927. Hippocratis Indices librorum, Iusiurandum, Lex, De arte, De medico, De decente habitu, Praeceptiones, De prisca medicina, De aere locis aquis, De alimento, De liquidorum usu, De flatibus, CMG I 1. Cambridge: Teubner.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. 1893. Claudii Galeni scripta minora. 3 vols. Cambridge: Teubner.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. 1901. Galenus de optima corporis constitutione. Idem de bono habitu . Cambridge: Hof.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. 1968 (1907–1909). De Usu Partium. 2 vols. Cambridge: Hakkert (original Leipzig: Bibliotheca Teubneriana.Google Scholar
Hensley, I. 2020. ‘The Physics of Pneuma in Early Stoicis.’. In The Concept of Pneuma after Aristotle, ed. Coughlin, S., Leith, D. and Lewis, O.. Cambridge: Topoi: 171–202.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2012. ‘Sympathy between Hippocrates and Galen: The Case of Galen’s Commentary on Epidemics I.‘. In Epidemics in Context: Hippocrates, Galen and Hunayn between East and West, ed. Pormann, P. E.. Cambridge: De Gruyter: 49–70.10.1515/9783110259803.49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, B. 2015. ‘Reflection: Galen’s Sympath.’. In Sympathy: A History, ed. Schliesser, E.. Cambridge: Oxford University Press: 61–9.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2017. ‘Pure Life: The Limits of the Vegetal Analogy in the Hippocratics and Gale.’. In The Comparable Body: Analogy and Metaphor in Ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and Greco-Roman Medicine, ed. Wee, J. . Cambridge: Brill: 358–86 . Google Scholar
Holmes, B. 2020. ‘Holism, Sympathy, and the Living Being in Ancient Greek Medicine and Philosoph.’. In Holism in Ancient Medicine and Its Reception, ed. Thumiger, C.. Cambridge: Brill: 47–83.10.1163/9789004443143_004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horstmanshoff, H. F. J., King, H. and Zittel, C. (eds.). 2012. Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789004229204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hort, A. (tr.). 2015. Theophrastus: Enquiry into Plants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. 1999. ‘Galen’s Criticism of the Aristotelian Theory of Colour Visio.’. In Antiaristotelismo, ed. Natali, C. and Maso, S.. Cambridge: Hakkert: 123–41.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. 2014. ‘On Galen’s Theory of Visio.’. In Philosophical Themes in Galen, ed. Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. and Wilberding, J.. Cambridge: Institute of Classical Studies: 235–48.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. 2015. ‘Wholes and Parts: M 9.331–35.’. In Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics, ed. Algra, K. and Ierodiakonou, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 105–29.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. 2022. ‘On Sense-Perception: Galen in Dialogue with Plato and the Stoic.’. In Galen’s Epistemology: Experience, Reason, and Method in Ancient Medicine, ed. Hankinson, R. and Havrda, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 218–31.Google Scholar
Ilberg, J. 1927. Sorani Gynaeciorum libri iv, de signis fracturarum, de fasciis, vita Hippocratis secundum Soranum, CMG 4. Cambridge: Teubner.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. W. 1938. Diokles von Karystos: Die griechische Medizin und die Schule des Aristoteles. Cambridge: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Johnston, I. 2006. Galen on Diseases and Symptoms (tr. of ‘On the Differentiae of Diseases’, ‘On the Causes of Diseases’ ‘On the Differentiae of Symptoms’, ‘On the Causes of Symptoms’). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, I. 2016. Galen: On the Constitution of the Art of Medicine; The Art of Medicine; A Method of Medicine to Glaucon. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Johnston, I. (ed. and tr.). 2018. Galen: Hygiene. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, I., and Horsley, G. H. R. 2011. Galen: Method of Medicine. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Joly, R., and Byl, S.. 1984. Hippocrate: Du regime, CMG I 2, 4. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1990. Hippocrate II I: De l’ancienne médecine. Cambridge: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 2002. Hippocratis De natura hominis, CMG I 1, 3. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 2009. ‘Does Galen Have a Medical Programme for Intellectuals and the Faculties of the Intellect.’ In Galen and the World of Knowledge, ed. Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 190–205.10.1017/CBO9780511770623.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouanna, J. 2013. Greek Medicine from Hippocrates to Galen: Selected Papers. Cambridge: Brill.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 1995. ‘Early Stoicism and Akrasi.’. Phronesis 40(3): 315–35.10.1163/156852895321051874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalbfleisch, K. 1896. Galeni Institutio logica. Cambridge: Teubner.Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. 2017. Plato’s Moral Psychology: Intellectualism, the Divided Soul, and the Desire for Good. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katayama, E. G. 1999. Aristotle on Artifacts: A Metaphysical Puzzle. Cambridge: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, D. 2017. ‘Galen on Reason and Appetite: A Study of the De 6 ’. Apeiron 50(3): 367–92.10.1515/apeiron-2016-0048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D. 2018. Experiencing Pain in Imperial Greek Culture. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, H. 1998. Hippocrates’ Women: Reading the Female Body in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koch, K., Helmreich, G, Kalbfleisch, K and Hartlich, O. 1923. Galeni de Sanitate Tuenda [Koch]; de Alimentorum Facultatibus [Helmreich]; de Bonis et Malis Alimentorum Sucis [Helmreich]; de Victu Attenuante [Kalbfleisch]; de Ptisana [Hartlich], CMG V 4, 2. Cambridge: Teubner.Google Scholar
Kollesch, J. 1964. De Instrumento Odoratus, CMG V. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Kollesch, J. 1981. ‘Galen und die Zweite Sophisti.’. In Galen: Problems and Prospects, ed. Nutton, V.. Cambridge: The Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine: 1–11.Google Scholar
Koslicki, K. 2008. The Structure of Things. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kovačić, F. 2001. Der Begriff der Physis bei Galen vor dem Hintergrund seiner Vorgänger. Cambridge: Steiner.Google Scholar
Kress, E. 2023. ‘How the Soul Uses Its Tools: Flexible Agency in Aristotle’s Account of Animal Generatio.’. Phronesis 68(3): 293–325.10.1163/15685284-12341053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühn, K. G. (ed.). 1821–33. Claudii Galeni Opera Omnia. 22 vols. Cambridge: Knobloch.Google Scholar
Kupreeva, I. 2014. ‘Galen’s Theory of Element.’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement no. 114: 153–96.Google Scholar
Kupreeva, I. 2022. ‘Galen’s Empiricist Background: A Study of the Argument in On Medical Experience ’. In Galen’s Epistemology: Experience, Reason, and Method in Ancient Medicine, ed. Hankinson, R. and Havrda, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 32–78.10.1017/9781009072670.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lacy, P. 1972. ‘Galen’s Platonis.’. The American Journal of Philology 93(1): 27–39.10.2307/292898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lacy, P. 1978–84. Galen: De Placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, CMG V 4, 1, 2. 3 vols. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
de Lacy, P. 1979. ‘Galen’s Concept of Continuit.’. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 20(4): 355–69.Google Scholar
de Lacy, P. 1992. Galen: De Semine, CMG V 3, 1. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
de Lacy, P. 1996. Galen: On the Elements According to Hippocrates, CMG V 1, 2. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Larrain, C. J. 1992. Galens Kommentar zu Platons Timaios. Cambridge: Teubner.10.1515/9783110979701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leith, D. 2012. ‘Pores and Void in Asclepiades’ Physical Theor.’. Phronesis 57(2): 164–91.10.1163/156852812X629005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leith, D. 2014. ‘Galen’s Refutation of Atomis.’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement no. 114: 213–34.Google Scholar
Leith, D. 2015. ‘Elements and Uniform Parts in Early Alexandrian Medicin.’. Phronesis 60(4): 462–91.10.1163/15685284-12341293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leith, D. 2020. ‘Herophilus and Erasistratus on the Hēgemoniko.’. In Body and Soul in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Inwood, B. and Warren, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 30–61.10.1017/9781108641487.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, J. 2001. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Leunissen, M. 2010. Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511762499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, E. 1995. ‘The Stoics on Identity and Individuatio.’. Phronesis 40(1): 89–108.10.1163/156852895321052026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, O. 2017. Praxagoras of Cos on Arteries, Pulse and Pneuma . Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789004337435CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, O., and Gregoric, P.. 2015. ‘The Context of “De Spiritu.”’ Early Science and Medicine 20(2): 125–49.10.1163/15733823-00202p02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Jones, H. S. 1996 (1940). A Greek–English Lexicon. 9th edn. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Littré, É. (ed.). 1839–61. Oeuvres complètes d’Hippocrate. 10 vols. Cambridge: J. B. Baillière.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1991. Methods and Problems in Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996. ‘Theories and Practises of Demonstration in Gale.’. In Rationality in Greek Thought, ed. Frede, M. and Striker, G.. Cambridge: Clarendon Press: 255–77.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2007. ‘Pneuma between Body and Sou.’. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13: S135–46.10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00409.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2008. ‘Galen and His Contemporaries’. In The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. Hankinson, R. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 34–48.10.1017/CCOL9780521819541.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. (eds.). 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longrigg, J. 1993. Greek Rational Medicine: Philosophy and Medicine from Alcmaeon to the Alexandrians. Cambridge: Routledge.10.4324/9780203328354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, M. C. 1969. Galeni de Partibus Artibus Medicativae, de Causis Contentivis, de Diaeta in Morbis Acutis Secundum Hippocratem, CMG Suppl. Or. II. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Makin, S. 2014. ‘Parmenides, Zeno, and Melissus.’ In The Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy, ed. Warren, J. and Sheffield, F.. Cambridge: Routledge: 34–48.Google Scholar
Manetti, D. 2011. Anonymi Londiniensis. De medicina. Cambridge: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1991. ‘The Idea of the Will in Chrysippus, Posidonius, and Gale.’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 7: 107–45.10.1163/2213441791X00079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J., and Runia, D. 2020. Aëtiana V: An Edition of the Reconstructed Text of the Placita with a Commentary and a Collection of Related Texts. 4 vols. Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789004428409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marechal, P. 2019. ‘Galen’s Constitutive Materialis.’. Ancient Philosophy 39(1): 191–209.10.5840/ancientphil201939110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattern, S. P. 2008. Galen and the Rhetoric of Healing . Cambridge: The Johns Hopkins University Press.10.1353/book.3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, M. T. 1968. Galen, On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body. Cambridge: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. 2010. The Female in Aristotle’s Biology: Reason or Rationalization. Cambridge: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meeusen, M. 2020. ‘Ps.-Alexander of Aphrodisias on Unsayable Properties in Medical Puzzles and Natural Problem.’. In Ancient Greek Medicine in Questions and Answers, ed. Meeusen, M.. Cambridge: Brill: 80–107.10.1163/9789004442672_006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelsohn, E. 1964. Heat and Life: The Development of the Theory of Animal Heat . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674180840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moraux, P. 1984. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias, Band II: Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jr. n. Chr. Cambridge: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Morison, B. 2008. ‘Logi.’. In The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. Hankinson, R. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 66–115.10.1017/CCOL9780521819541.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J. 1891. Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora, vol. 2. Cambridge: Teubner.Google Scholar
Nickel, D. 2001. Galeni De foetuum formatione, CMG V 3, 3. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.10.1524/9783050080413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Nuffelen, P. 2014. ‘Galen, Divination and the Status of Medicin.’. Classical Quarterly 64(1): 337–52.10.1017/S0009838813000761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1978. Aristotle’s De motu animalium: Text with Translation, Commentary, and Interpretive Essays. Cambridge: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 1999. Galen: On my Own Opinions, CMG 3, 2. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 2005. ‘The Fatal Embrace: Galen and the History of Ancient Medicin.’. Science in Context 18(1): 111–21.10.1017/S0269889705000384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutton, V. 2008. ‘The Fortunes of Gale.’. In The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. Hankinson, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 355–90.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. 2012a. Ancient Medicine. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Taylor and Francis.10.4324/9780203081297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutton, V. 2012b. ‘ Physiologia from Galen to Jacob Bordin.’. In Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe, ed. Horstmanshoff, M., King, H. and Zittel, C.. Cambridge: Brill: 25–40.10.1163/9789004229204_003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutton, V. 2020. Galen: A Thinking Doctor in Imperial Rome. Cambridge: Routledge.10.4324/9780429341380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutton, V., and Bos, G.. 2011. Galen: On Problematical Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..Google Scholar
O’Brien, C. S. 2015. The Demiurge in Ancient Thought. Secondary Gods and Divine Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139871723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, S. 2004. A History of Nerve Functions: From Animal Spirits to Molecular Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511546358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2005. ‘Demiurges in Early Imperial Platonis.’. In Gott und die Gotter bei Plutarch, ed. Hirsch-Luipold, R.. Cambridge: De Gruyter: 51–99.Google Scholar
Overwien, O. 2014. Hippocratis De humoribus, CMG I 3, 1. Cambridge: De Gruyter.10.1524/9783110362442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, C. 2009. Galien. Œuvres. Tome III: Le médecin. Introduction. Cambridge: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Petit, C. 2018. Galien de Pergame ou la rhétorique de la Providence: Médecine, Littérature et Pouvoir à Rome. Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789004380967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, C. (ed.). 2019. Galen’s Treatise Περὶ Ἀλυπίας (De indolentia) in Context. Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789004383302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polito, R. 2006. ‘Matter. Medicine and the Mind: Asclepiades versus Epicurus’. OSAP 30: 285–336.Google Scholar
Powers, N. 2013. ‘Plato’s Demiurge as Precursor to the Stoic Providential Go.’. The Classical Quarterly 63(2): 713–22.10.1017/S0009838813000190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prager, F. D. 1974. Pneumatica: The Treatise on Experimental Physics, Western Version and Eastern Version: Facs. and Transcript of the Latin manuscript, CLM 534, Bayer. Staatsbibliothek, Munich: transl. and ill. of the Arabic manuscript, A.S. 3713, Aya-Sofya, Istanbul. Cambridge: Reichert.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 1997. ‘Posidonius and the Timaeus: Off to Rhodes and Back to Plato.’ The Classical Quarterly 47(2): 455–76.10.1093/cq/47.2.455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhetorical Strategies and Generic Conventions in the Galenic Corpus’ (PhD dissertation. Newcastle University).Google Scholar
Rocca, J. 2003. Galen on the Brain: Anatomical Knowledge and Physiological Speculation in the Second Century AD. Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789047401438CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocca, J. 2006. ‘“Plato Will Tell You”: Galen’s Use of the Phaedrus in De Placitis Hippcoratis et Platonis I.’. In Reading Plato in Antiquity, ed. Tarrant, H. and Baltzly, D.. Cambridge: Bloomsbury Publishing: 49–60.Google Scholar
Rocca, J. 2012. ‘From Doubt to Certainty: Aspects of the Conceptualisation and Interpretation of Galen’s Natural Pneum.’. In Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe, ed. Horstmanshoff, M., King, H. and Zittel, C.. Cambridge: Leiden: 627–59.Google Scholar
Rocca, J. 2017. ‘Galen and Middle Platonism: The Case of the Demiurg.’. In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. Cambridge: Brill: 206–22.Google Scholar
Rocca, J. 2020. ‘Pneuma as a Holistic Concept in Gale.’. In Holism in Ancient Medicine and Its Reception, ed. Thumiger, C.. Cambridge: Leiden: 268–91.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. 2013. ‘Galen, Plato, and the Physiology of Eros’. In Eros in Ancient Greece, ed. Sanders, E., Thumiger, C., Carey, C. and Lowe, N.. Cambridge: Oxford University Press: 111–27.Google Scholar
Salas, L. A. 2020a. ‘Galen on the Definition of Disease’. American Journal of Philology 141(4): 603–34.10.1353/ajp.2020.0031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, L. A. 2020b. Cutting words: Polemical Dimensions of Galen’s Anatomical Experiments. Cambridge: Brill.Google Scholar
Sauvé Meyer, S. 2009. ‘Chain of Causes: What Is Stoic Fate.’ In God and Cosmos in Stoicism, ed. Salles, R.. Cambridge: Oxford University Press: 71–92.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556144.003.0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scade, P. 2010. ‘Stoic Cosmological Limits and Their Platonic Backgroun.’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 107: 143–83.Google Scholar
Schiefsky, M. J. 2007. ‘Galen’s Teleology and Functional Explanation’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33: 369–400.10.1093/oso/9780199238019.003.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiefsky, M. J. 2012. ‘Galen and the Tripartite Soul’. In Plato and the Divided Self, ed. Barney, R., Brennan, T. and Brittain, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 331–49.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W. 1899. Heronis Alexandrini opera quae supersunt omnia, vol. 1. Cambridge: Teubner.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. 1997. Bildung und Macht: zur sozialen und politische Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. Cambridge: Beck.Google Scholar
Schröder, H. O., and Kahle, P. 1934. Galeni in Platonis Timaeum Commentarii Fragmenta, CMG 1. Cambridge: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1982. ‘The Stoic Criterion of Identit.’. Phronesis 27(3): 255–75.10.1163/156852882X00177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 2005. ‘Stoic Metaphysics at Rome’. In Metaphysics, Soul and Ethics: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji, ed. Salles, R.. Cambridge: Oxford University Press: 117–42.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Cambridge: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520934368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 2008. ‘Atomism’s Eleatic Roots’. In The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, ed. Curd, P. and Graham, D. W.. Cambridge: Oxford University Press: 305–32.Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2007. ‘Unified Agency and Akrasia in Plato’s Republic’. In Akrasia in Greek Philosophy: From Socrates to Plotinus, ed. Bobonich, C. and Destrée, P.. Cambridge: Brill: 61–8.Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2008. ‘Substance and Life in Aristotle’. Apeiron 41(3): 129–51.10.1515/APEIRON.2008.41.3.129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, D., and McVaugh, M. 1979. ‘Galen, on Tremor, Palpitation, Spasm and Rigor’. Transactions and Studies of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia 1: 183–210.Google ScholarPubMed
Siegel, R. E. 1968–73. Galen’s System of Physiology and Medicine. Cambridge: Karger.Google Scholar
Siegel, R. E. 1976. Galen: On the Affected Parts. Cambridge: Karger.Google Scholar
Singer, C. 1956. Galen On Anatomical Procedures: De Anatomicis Administrationibus. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1991. ‘Aspects of Galen’s Platonism’. In Galeno: obra, pensamiento e influencia: Coloquio internacional, Madrid, 1988, ed. Férez, López. Cambridge: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia: 41–56.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1996. ‘Notes on Galen’s Hippocrates’. In Studi Storia Della Medicina Antica E Medievale, ed. Vegetti, M. and Gastaldi, S.. Cambridge: La Nuova Italia: 66–76.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1997. Galen: Selected Works. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 2013a. ‘General Introduction’. In Galen: Psychological Writings, ed. Singer, P. N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–40.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 2013b. ‘Introduction to The Capacities of the Soul Depend on the Mixture of the Body’. In Galen: Psychological Writings, ed. Singer, P. N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 335–70.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 2014. ‘Galen and the Philosophers: Philosophical Engagement, Shadowy Contemporaries, Aristotelian Transformations’. In Philosophical Themes in Galen, ed. Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. and Wilberding, J.. Cambridge: Institute of Classical Studies: 7–38.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 2017. ‘The Essence of Rage: Galen on Emotional Disturbances and Their PhysicalS Correlates’. In Selfhood and the Soul, ed. Seaford, R., Wilkins, J. and Wright, M.. Cambridge: Oxford University Press: 161–96.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 2018. ‘Galen’s Pathological Soul: Diagnosis and Therapy in Ethical Medical Texts and Contexts’. In Mental Illness in Ancient Medicine, ed. Thumiger, C. and Singer, P.. Cambridge: Brill: 381–420.10.1163/9789004362260_016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P. 2020. ‘Galen on Pneuma: Between Metaphysical Speculation and Anatomical Theory’. In The Concept of Pneuma after Aristotle, ed. Coughlin, S., Leith, D. and Lewis, O.. Cambridge: De Gruyter: 237–82.Google Scholar
Slaveva-Griffin, S. Manuscript in preparation. Medical Interest of the Neoplatonists: From Plotinus to Proclus. Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 2000. Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1989. Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1992. ‘Jaeger’s “Skandalon der historischen Vernunft”: Diocles, Aristotle, and Theophrastus’. In Werner Jaeger Reconsidered, ed. Calder, W. M III. Cambridge: Scholars Press: 227–65.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 1995. ‘Anatomy as Rhetoric: Galen on Dissection and Persuasion’. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 50(1): 47–66.10.1093/jhmas/50.1.47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Staden, H. 1997a. ‘Galen and the “Second Sophistic.”’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 68: 33–54.10.1111/j.2041-5370.1997.tb02261.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Staden, H. 1997b. ‘Teleology and Mechanism: Aristotelian Biology and Early Hellenistic Medicine’. In Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse, ed. Pullman, W. and Follinger, S.. Cambridge: Steiner: 183–208.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. 2000. ‘Body, Soul, and Nerves: Epicurus, Herophilus, Erasistratus, the Stoics, and Galen’. In Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind-Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment, ed. Wright, J. and Potter, P.. Cambridge: Oxford University Press: 79–116.10.1093/oso/9780198238409.003.0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, K. A. 2018. Galen’s Theory of Black Bile: Hippocratic Tradition, Manipulation, Innovation. Cambridge: Brill.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 1996. Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism and Power in the Greek World AD 50–250 . Cambridge: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198147725.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, H. 2017. ‘Teleology and Names in the Platonic and Anaxogorean Tradition’. In Teleology in the Ancient World, ed. Rocca, J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 58–75. Google Scholar
Tecusan, M. 2004. The Fragments of the Methodists: Methodism outside Soranus: Volume 1: Text and Translation. Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789047412687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, O. 1973. Galenism: Rise and Decline of a Medical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Thumiger, C., and Singer, P. N. (eds.). 2018. Mental Illness in Ancient Medicine: From Celsus to Paul of Aegina. Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789004362260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieleman, T. 1995. ‘Dialectic and Science: Galen, Herophilus and Aristotle on Phenomen.. Vol. 2’. In Ancient Medicine in Its Socio-cultural Context, ed. van der Eijk, P., Horstmanshoff, H. and Schrijvers, P.. Cambridge: Rodopi: 487–95.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 1996. Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation on the De Placitis Books II–III. Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789004320925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2003a. Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation. Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789004321175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2003b. ‘Galen’s Psychology’. In Galien et la Philosophie Entretiens sur l’antiquite classique, vol. 49, ed. Barnes, J. and Jouanna, J.. Cambridge: Fondation Hardt: 131–61.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2005. ‘Galen and Genesis’. In The Creation of Heaven and Earth: Re-interpretations of Genesis I in the Context of Judaism, Ancient Philosophy, Christianity, and Modern Physics, ed. van Kooten, George H.. Cambridge: Brill: 125–45.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2008. ‘Methodology’. In The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. Hankinson, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2009. ‘Galen and the Stoics: On the Art of Not Naming’. In Galen and the World of Knowledge, ed. Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J.. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press: 282–99.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2016. ‘Religion and Therapy in Galen’. In Religion and Illness, ed. Etzelmüller, G. and Weissenrieder, A.. Cambridge: Wipf and Stock Publishers: 15–31.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2020. ‘Galen’s Self-understanding and the Platonic Phaedrus ’. In The Reception of Plato’s ‘Phaedrus’ from Antiquity to the Renaissance, ed. Delcomminette, S., D’Hoine, P. and Gavray, M.-A.. Cambridge: De Gruyter: 25–39.10.1515/9783110683936-003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2022. ‘Galen’s Notion of Dialectic’. In Galen’s Epistemology: Experience, Reason, and Method in Ancient Medicine, ed. Hankinson, R. and Havrda, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 136–55. Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. Forthcoming. ‘Galen and Academic Scepticism’. In Galen aus Pergamon: Philosophie in der römischen Kaiserzeit, Philosophie der Antike, hrsg. W. Kullmann, ed. Leven, K.-H. Cambridge: Steiner.Google Scholar
Trompeter, J. 2018. ‘The Actions of Spirit and Appetite: Voluntary Motion in Galen’. Phronesis 63(2): 176–207.10.1163/15685284-12341346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trompeter, J. 2025. Galen on Ethics and Human Nature. Cambridge: Brill.10.1163/9789004733138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallance, J. T. 1990. The Lost Theory of Asclepiades of Bithynia. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198242482.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasallo, C. (ed.). 2017. Physiologia: Topics in Presocratic Philosophy and Its Reception in Antiquity (= AKAN-Einzelschriften, 12). Cambridge: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. 2000. ‘De caelo in terram. Il Timeo in Galeno (De placitis, Quod animi)’. In La filosofia in età imperiale: Le scuole e le tradizione filosofiche, ed. Brancacci, A.. Cambridge: Bibliopolis: 69–84.Google Scholar
Vinkesteijn, R. 2022. Philosophical Perspectives on Galen of Pergamum: Four Case-Studies on Human Nature and the Relation between Body and Soul . Cambridge: Brill.Google Scholar
Walzer, R. 1949. Galen on Jews and Christians. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waterlow, S. 1982. Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198246534.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenkebach, E. 1951. Galeni Adversus Lycum et Adversus Iulianum, CMG V 10, 3. Cambridge: Akademie Verlag.10.1515/9783112741474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. 2003. ‘Stoic Natural Philosophy (Physics and Cosmology)’. In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 124–52.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2014. ‘The Secret of Sentient Vegetative Life in Galen’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement, no. 114: 249–68.Google Scholar
Wills, A. 1999. ‘Herophilus, Erasistratus and the birth of Neuroscience’. Lancet 354: 1719–20.10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02081-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, C. 2012. ‘Aristotle on Deformed Animal Kind.’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 83–106.Google Scholar
Yeo, I.-S. 2002. ‘Hippocrates in the Context of Galen: Galen’s Commentary on the Classification of Fever.’. In Epidemics VI: In Hippocrates in Contexts, ed. van der Eijk, P.. Cambridge: Brill: 433–44.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Aistė Čelkytė, Universiteit Leiden
  • Book: Galen on Human Physiology
  • Online publication: 28 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009435833.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Aistė Čelkytė, Universiteit Leiden
  • Book: Galen on Human Physiology
  • Online publication: 28 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009435833.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Aistė Čelkytė, Universiteit Leiden
  • Book: Galen on Human Physiology
  • Online publication: 28 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009435833.009
Available formats
×