Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-vmslq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-25T07:43:43.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  aN Invalid Date NaN

Douglas Moggach
Douglas Moggach
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa and University of Sydney
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Freedom and Perfection
German Political Thought from Leibniz to Marx
 , pp. 324 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Primary Sources

Aristotle. 1925. Metaphysics, trans. W. D. Ross, revised ed., Oxford.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1995. Politics, trans. E Barker, Oxford.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 2009. Nicomachean Ethics, trans. D. Ross, revised ed., Oxford.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. (anon.). 1841. Die Posaune des jüngsten Gerichts über Hegel den Atheisten und Antichristen: Ein Ultimatum, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. 1843. Deutschland während der ersten vierzig Jahre des 18. Jahrhundert, Charlottenburg.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. (anon.). 1845. “Charakteristik Ludwig Feuerbachs,” Wigands Vierteljahrschrift III, Leipzig, 86–146.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. 1968. Feldzüge der reinen Kritik, ed. H.-M. Sass, Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, A. 1739 [1783]. Metaphysica, 3rd ed., Halle.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. 1991. On Duties, ed. Atkins, E. M., trans. M. T. Griffin, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dalberg, K. von. 1793. “Von den wahren Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staats in Beziehung auf seine Mitglieder,” reproduced in Leroux 1932, 45–54.Google Scholar
Dalberg, K. von. 1791. Grundsätze der Ästhetik, deren Anwendung und künftige Entwicklung, ErfurtGoogle Scholar
Epictetus, . 1948. Enchiridion, trans. T. W. Higginson, New York.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, L. 1969 [1837]. Darstellung, Entwicklung und Kritik der Leibnizschen Philosophie. Geschichte der neueren Philosophie. Gesammelte Werke, vol. 3, Berlin.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, L. 1974 [1835]. Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der neueren Philosophie, ed. Thies, E., Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, L. 1981–. Gesammelte Werke, ed. Schuffenhauer, W., Berlin.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. 1965–. Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie, 17 vols., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. 1965 [1794–95]. Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre, Gesamtausgabe, Bd. I/2, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. 1966 [1796]. Grundlage des Naturrechts nach Prinzipien der Wissenschaftslehre, Gesamtausgabe, vol. I/3, I/4, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. 1970. Science of Knowledge (Wissenschaftslehre), trans. P. Heath and J. Lachs, New York.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. 1977 [1798]. System der Sittenlehre Gesamtausgabe, vol. I/5, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. 1988 [1800]. Der geschlossene Handelsstaat Gesamtausgabe, vol. I/7, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gans, E. 1995 [1836]. Rückblicke auf Personen und Zustände, ed. Waszek, N., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1964 [1835–38]. Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik, 3 vols., Sämtliche Werke, ed. Glockner, H., vols. 12–14, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1971 [1833]. Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, III, Werke, vol. 20, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1975a [1830]. Logic, Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences, Part I, trans. W. Wallace, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1975b [1837]. Lectures on the Philosophy of World History. Introduction: Reason in History, trans. H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1983. Philosophie des Rechts. Die Vorlesung von 1899/20 in einer Nachschrift, ed. Henrich, D., Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1989 [1827]. Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse, Gesammelte Werke, vol. 19, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1991 [1821]. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, A. W., trans. H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2009 [1821]. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, Gesammelte Werke, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2017 [1828–29]. Vorlesungen zur Ästhetik. Vorlesungsmitschrift Adolf Heimann (1828/1829), ed. Olivier, A. P. and Gethmann-Siefert, A., Paderborn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2023. Lectures on the Philosophy of Right, 1819–1820, ed. Brudner, A., Toronto.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. 1877 [1774]. Auch eine Philosophie der Geschichte zur Bildung der Menschheit, Sämtliche Werke, vol. 5, Berlin.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. 1965 [1784–91]. Ideen zu einer Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 2014 [1651]. Leviathan, ed. Malcolm, N., Oxford.Google Scholar
Hufeland, Gottlieb. 1785. Versuch über den Grundsatz des Naturrechts, Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hufeland, Gottlieb. 1790 [1795]. Lehrsätze des Naturrechts. Jena; 2nd ed., Frankfurt and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W von. 1903 [1792]. Ideen zu einem Versuch die Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen. Gesammelte Schriften Bd. 1, Berlin.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W von. 1903–1936. Gesammelte Schriften, 17 vols., Berlin.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W von. 1969. The Limits of State Action, ed. Burrow, J. W., Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1963 [1781]. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 1st ed., Immanuel Kants Gesammelte Schriften, Ak. vol. 4, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1963 [1785]. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Ak. vol. 4, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1923 [1786]. “Rezension zu Gottlieb Hufeland, ‘Versuch über den Grundsatz des Naturrechts,’” Ak. vol 8, Berlin, 127–30.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1963 [1786]. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft, Ak. vol. 4, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1962 [1787]. Kritik der reinen Vernunft, 2nd ed., Ak. vol. 3, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1963 [1788]. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, Ak. vol. 5, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1963 [1790]. Kritik der Urteilskraft, Ak. vol. 5, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1969 [1797]. Die Metaphysik der Sitten, Ak. vol. 6, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1956. Critique of Practical Reason, trans. L. W. Beck, New York.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1964 Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. H. J. Paton, New York.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1970a. “On the Common Saying: ‘This May Be True in Theory, But it Does not Apply in Practice’,” in Kant’s Political Writings, ed. Reiss, Hans, Cambridge, 61–92.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1970b. “Perpetual Peace,” in Political Writings, ed. Reiss, , Cambridge, 93–130.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1987. The Critique of Judgment, trans. W. Pluhar, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1991. The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1998 [1781/87]. Critique of Pure Reason, ed. Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W., Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 2004. Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie, ed. Stark, W., Berlin.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 2005. Notes and Fragments, ed. Guyer, P., trans. C. Bowman, P. Guyer, and F. Rauscher, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1860. Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Christian Wolff, ed. Gerhardt, C. I., Halle.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1948. Textes inédits, d’après les manuscrits de la Bibliothèque provinciale de Hanovre, published and annotated by G. Grua, ParisGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1952. Theodicy, ed. Farrer, A., New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1988. Political Writings, ed. Riley, P., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1991. Monadology, ed. Rescher, N., Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1993. Leibniz-Thomasius. Correspondance (1663–1672), ed. Bodéus, R., Paris.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1996a [1720]. Monadologie, ed. Horn, J. C., Würzburg.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1996b. Philosophische Werke, 4 vols., Hamburg.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 2008 [1875–1890]. Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, ed. Gerhardt, C. I., reprint, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 2016. The Leibniz-Arnauld Correspondence, ed. Voss, S., New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Lessing, G. E. 2005. Philosophical and Theological Writings, ed. and trans. Nisbet, H. B., Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. 1988 [1690]. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, P., revised ed., Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, N. 1988. The Prince, ed. Skinner, Q., trans. R. Price, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1927 [1842]. “The Philosophical Manifesto of the Historical School of Law,” in Marx Engels Collected Works, vol. 2, New York.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1959 [1894], Capital, vol. III, New York.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1967 [1867]. Capital, vol. I, New York.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 2009 [1844]. Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte, ed. Quante, M., Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, M. 1997. Philosophical Writings, ed. Dahlstrom, D., Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelssohn, M. 2005. Ästhetische Schriften, ed. Pollok, A., Hamburg.Google Scholar
Reinhold, K. L. 1790–92. Briefe über die Kantische Philosophie, 2nd ed., Jena.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. 1963. [1762]. Du contrat social, Paris.Google Scholar
Ruge, A., 1972 [1840/42]. “Zur Kritik des gegenwärtigen Staats- und Völkerrechts,” and “Die Hegelsche Rechtsphilosophie und die Politik unsrer Zeit,” in Hegel, G. W. F., Philosophie des Rechts, ed. Reichelt, H., Frankfurt/M., 598–649.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. 1967 [1795]. On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters, bilingual edition, ed. Wilkinson, Elizabeth and Willoughby, L. A., Oxford.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. 1984 [1795–96]. “Über naïve und sentimentale Dichtung,” in Über das Schone und die Kunst. Schriften zur Ästhetik, ed. Fricke, G. and Gopfert, H. G., Munich.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. 1793. Über Anmut und Würde, Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, F. 1996 [1796]. “Essay on the Concept of Republicanism occasioned by the Kantian Tract Perpetual Peace,” in The Early Political Writings of the German Romantics, ed. and trans. Beiser, Frederick, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schlegel, F. 2003 [1797–99]. ‘Critical Fragments’, ‘Athenaeum Fragments’, ‘Ideas’, in Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics, ed. Bernstein, J. M., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. 2018 [1677]. Ethics. ed. Kisner, M., trans. M. Silverthorne, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1723. Vernünftige Gedanken von den Wirkungen der Natur, Halle.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1969 [1754]. Institutiones juris naturae et gentium. Gesammelte Werke, Bd. 26, ed. Thomann, M., Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1971 [1721]. Vernünftige Gedanken von dem gesellschaftlichen Leben der Menschen und insonderheit dem gemeinen Wesen, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. 1988 [1758]. Principes du droit de la nature et des gens, extrait du grand ouvrage latin, par M. Formey, first volume, Caen.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Allison, H. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, H. 2012. Essays on Kant, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altwicker, T., Cheneval, F., and Mahlmann, M., eds. 2020. Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie bei G. W. Leibniz, Tübingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, K. and Sturma, D., eds. 1995. The Modern Subject. Conceptions of the Self in Classical German Philosophy, Albany.Google Scholar
Antognazza, M. R. 2009. Leibniz. An Intellectual Biography, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Avineri, S. 2002. Hegel’s Theory of the Modern State, 2nd ed., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barnikol, E. 1972. Bruno Bauer, Studien und Materialien, ed. Riemer, P. and Sass, H.‑M., Assen.Google Scholar
Bärthlein, K. 1988. “Die Vorbereitung der Kantischen Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie in der Schulphilsophie,” in Kant: Analysen-Probleme-Kritik, ed. Oberer, H. and Seel, G., Würzburg, 221–71.Google Scholar
Basso, L. 2005. Individuo e communità nella filosofia politica di G. W. Leibniz, Soveria Mannelli.Google Scholar
Baur, M. and Russon, J.. 1997. Hegel and the Tradition, Toronto.Google Scholar
Beaulieu-Marconnay, K. von. 1879. Karl von Dalberg und seine Zeit, Weimar, 2 vol.Google Scholar
Beiner, R. and W. J. Booth, , eds. 1993. Kant and Political Philosophy. The Contemporary Legacy, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. 2003. The Romantic Imperative, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. 2005a. Schiller as Philosopher: A Re-Examination, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, F. 2005b. Hegel, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, F. 2011. The German Historicist Tradition, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, F. ed. 1993. The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, F. ed. 2008. The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth Century Philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, J. and Lutz-Bachmann, M.. 1997. Perpetual Peace. Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bourke, R. 2023. Hegel’s World Revolutions, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Breckman, W. 1998. Marx, The Young Hegelians, and the Origins of Radical Social Theory, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brudney, D. 1998. Marx’s Attempt to Leave Philosophy, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubner, R. 2009. Innovations of Idealism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Buchdahl, G. 1969. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
Buhr, M., ed. 1994. Das geistige Erbe Europas, Naples.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. 1962 [1902]. Leibniz’ System in seinen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. 2001 [1917]. Freiheit und Form. Studien zur deutschen Geistesgeschichte, ed. Schmücker, R., Hamburg.Google Scholar
Cesa, C. 2000. “Introduzione. Diritto naturale e filosofia classica tedesca,” in Diritto naturale e filosofia classica tedesca, ed. Fonnesu, L. and Henry, B., Pisa, 9–38.Google Scholar
Chytry, J. 1989. The Aesthetic State. A Quest in Modern German Thought, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. and Gottlieb, G., eds. 2021. Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel. Freedom, Right, and Revolution, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corr, C. A. 1975. “Christian Wolff and Leibniz,” Journal of the History of Ideas 36/2, 241–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, J. A. and O’Leary-Hawthorne, J.. 1999. Substance and Individuation in Leibniz, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristman, . J. and Anderson, J., eds. 2005. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Souza, N. 2012. “Leibniz in the Eighteenth Century: Herder’s Critical Reflections on the Principles of Nature and Grace,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20/4, 773–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deligiorgi, K. 2006. Hegel. New Directions, Chesham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Hondt, J. 1988. Hegel in His Time, Peterborough, ON.Google Scholar
Dreitzel, H. 1992. Absolutismus und ständische Verfassung in Deutschland, Mainz.Google Scholar
Dreitzel, H. 2003. “The Reception of Hobbes in the Political Philosophy of the Early German Enlightenment,” History of European Ideas 29/3, 255–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, S. and Whiting, J., eds. 1996. Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Flikschuh, K. 2000. Kant and Modern Political Philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonnesu, L. 2004. “Kants praktische Philosophie und die Verwirklichung der Moral,” in Recht-Geschichte-Religion. Die Bedeutung Kants für die Gegenwart, ed. Nagl-Docekal, H. and Langthaler, R., Berlin, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, P. 2002. Hegel’s Philosophy of Freedom, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Frank, M. 1989. Einführung in die frühromantische Ästhetik, Vorlesungen Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
Frank, M. 1997. “Unendliche Annäherung”. Die Anfänge der philosophischen Frühromantik, Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
Frank, M. 2007. Auswege aus dem deutschen Idealismus, Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
Franks, P. 2005. All or Nothing. Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Garber, D. and Longuenesse, B., eds. 2008. Kant and the Early Moderns, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, S. and Grist, M., eds. 2015. The Transcendental Turn, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grapotte, S. and Prunea-Bretonnet, T., eds. 2011. Kant et Wolff, Paris.Google Scholar
Grua, G. 1953. Jurisprudence universelle et théodicée selon Leibniz, Paris.Google Scholar
Grua, G. 1956. La justice humaine selon Leibniz, Paris.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. 1934. Dynamique et métaphysique leibniziennes, Paris.Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. 1982. L’évolution et la structure de la doctrine de la science chez Fichte, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. 2004. “Civic Responsibility and the Kantian Social Contract,” in Recht-Geschichte-Religion, ed. Langthaler, Nagl-Docekal, Berlin, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. 2011a. “Kantian Perfectionism,” in Perfecting Virtue. New Essays on Kantian Ethics and Virtue Ethics, ed. Jost, Lawrence and Wuerth, Julian, Cambridge, 194–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. 2011b. “Perfection, Autonomy, and Heautonomy: The Path of Reason from Wolff to Kant,” in Wolff und die europäische Aufklärung: Akten des 1. Internationalen Wolff-Kongresses, ed. Stolzenberg, Jürgen, Hildesheim, 299–322.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, K. 2006. “German Natural Law,” in The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, ed. Goldie, M. and Wokler, R., Cambridge, 251–90.Google Scholar
Harris, H. S. 1983. “The Social Ideal of Hegel’s Economic Theory,” in Hegel’s Philosophy of Action, ed. Stepelevich, L. S. and Lamb, D., Atlantic Highlands, NJ, 49–74.Google Scholar
Hartmann, K. 1984. “Towards a New Systematic Reading of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right,” in The State and Civil Society, ed. Pelczynski, Z. A., Cambridge, 114–36.Google Scholar
Heinekamp, A. 1986. Beiträge zur Wirkungs- und Rezeptionsgeschichte von G.W. Leibniz, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. 2003. Between Kant and Hegel. Lectures on German Idealism, ed. Pacini, D., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hernández Marcos, M. 1995. “La formación del criticismo juridico de Kant,” Revista de estudios políticos 89, 243–80.Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, T. J. 2000. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höffe, O., ed. 1999. Immanuel Kant: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höffe, O., ed. 2006. Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace, trans. Alexandra Newton, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T. S., ed. 2014. Das Recht als Form der ‘Gemeinschaft freier Wesen als solcher’, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. 1996. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, trans. J. Anderson, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Horn, J. C. 1994. “Die nachkantische Wende als Vollendung der Tranzendentalphilosophie,” in Buhr, ed., 1994, 250–71.Google Scholar
Hudson, W., Moggach, D., and Stamm, M.. 2016. Rethinking German Idealism, Aurora, CO.Google Scholar
Hunter, I. 2001. Rival Enlightenments. Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, T. 1993. Perfectionism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ilting, K.-H, ed. 1973. GWF Hegel. Vorlesungen über Rechtsphilosophie, 1818–1831, 4 vols., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ilting, K.-H, 1984. “Hegel’s Concept of the State and Marx’s Early Critique,” in The State and Civil Society, ed. Pelczynski, Z. A., Cambridge, 93–113.Google Scholar
Inwood, B., ed. 2003. Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivaldo, M. 1992. Libertà e ragione. L’etica di Fichte, Milan.Google Scholar
Jaeschke, W. and Holzhey, H., eds. 1990. Früher Idealismus und Frühromantik. Der Streit um die Grundlagen der Ästhetik (1795–1805), Hamburg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, D. 2011. Fichte’s Social and Political Philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarczyk, G. and Labarrière, P.-J.. 1989. Le syllogisme du pouvoir. Y a-t-il une démocratie hégélienne?, Paris.Google Scholar
Johns, C. 2013. The Science of Right in Leibniz’s Moral and Political Philosophy, London.Google Scholar
Jolley, N., ed. 1995. The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kahlo, M., et al., eds. 1992. Fichtes Lehre vom Rechtsverhältnis, Frankfurt/M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, A. 1999. Welfare in the Kantian State, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klippel, D. 1976. Politische Freiheit und Freiheitsrechte im deutschen Naturrecht des 18. Jahrhunderts, Paderborn.Google Scholar
Klippel, D. 1998. “Der liberale Interventionsstaat. Staatszweck und Staatstätigkeit in der deutschen politischen Theorie des 18. und der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts,” in Recht und Rechtswissenschaft im mitteldeutschen Raum, ed. Lück, H., Köln, 77–103.Google Scholar
Kosch, M. 2015. “Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth Century Ethics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53/1, 111–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laerke, M., Leduc, C., and Rabouin, D., eds. 2017. Lire Leibniz, Paris.Google Scholar
Lartillot, F. 2015. Le libéralisme de Wilhelm von Humboldt, Paris.Google Scholar
Leipold, B. 2024. Citizen Marx: Republicanism and the Formation of Marx’s Social and Political Thought, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Léon, X. 1954. Fichte et son temps, 2 vol., Paris.Google Scholar
Leopold, D. 2007. The Young Karl Marx, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroux, R. 1932a. La théorie du despotisme éclairé chez Karl Theodor Dalberg, Paris.Google Scholar
Leroux, R. 1932b. Guillaume de Humboldt: La formation de sa pensée jusqu’en 1794, Paris.Google Scholar
Lipton, D. 1978. Ernst Cassirer: The Dilemma of a Liberal Intellectual in Germany 1914–33, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liske, M.-T. 1993. Leibniz’ Freiheitslehre, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Look, B., ed. 2011/2014. The Bloomsbury Companion to Leibniz, London.Google Scholar
Look, B., ed. 2021. Leibniz and Kant, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losurdo, D. 2004. Hegel and the Freedom of the Moderns, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Lypp, B. 1972. Ästhetischer Absolutismus und politische Vernunft, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Macintyre, A. 2007. After Virtue, 3rd ed., Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Maesschalck, M. 1996. Droit et création sociale chez Fichte, Louvain.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. 1956. Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory, Boston.Google Scholar
McCarthy, G. E. 1992. Marx and Aristotle, Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
Menke, C. 1999. “Ästhetische Subjektivität. Zu einem Grundbegriff moderner Ästhetik,” in Konzepte der Moderne, ed. von Graevenitz, G., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Menke, C. 2018. Autonomie und Befreiung, Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
Moggach, D. 2003. The Philosophy and Politics of Bruno Bauer, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moggach, D. ed. 2006. The New Hegelians, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moggach, D. ed. 2011 Politics, Religion, and Art: Hegelian Debates, Evanston, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moggach, D. and Schultze, W.. 1996. Bruno Bauer: Über die Prinzipien des Schönen. De pulchri principiis. Eine Preisschrift, Berlin.Google Scholar
Moggach, D., Mooren, N., and Quante, M., eds. 2020. Perfektionismus der Autonomie, Paderborn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulholland, L. 1990. Kant’s System of Rights, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nachtomy, O. 2007. Possibility, Agency, and Individuality in Leibniz’s Metaphysics, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagl-Docekal, H. and Langthaler, R., eds. 2004. Recht-Geschichte-Religion: Die Bedeutung Kants für die Gegenwart, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakhimovsky, I. 2011. The Closed Commercial State, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Neimann, S. 1997. The Unity of Reason. Rereading Kant, Oxford.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, F. 2000. Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhouser, F. 2016. “Die Dialektik der Freiheit in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie,” Hegel-Studien Bd. 50, 13–31.Google Scholar
Neumann, H.-P. 2013. Monaden in Diskurs. Monas, Monaden, Monadologie (1600 bis 1770), Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’ Neill, O. 1989. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Oz-Salzberger, F. 1995. Translating the Enlightenment: Scottish Civic Discourse in Eighteenth-Century Germany, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, A. 1999. Hegel’s Idea of Freedom, Oxford.Google Scholar
Philonenko, A. 1968. Théorie et praxis dans la pensée morale et politique de Kant et de Fichte en 1793, Paris.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. 1996. Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. 2002. German Philosophy: The Legacy of Idealism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. 2008. Hegel’s Practical Philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. 1997. Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. 1989. Hegel’s Idealism, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R., and Höffe, O., eds. 2004. Hegel on Ethics and Politics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöggeler, O., et al., eds. 1981. Hegel in Berlin. Preußische Kulturpolitik und idealistische Ästhetik, Berlin.Google Scholar
Quante, M., ed. 2009. Karl Marx. Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Quante, M., 2006. “Die fragile Einheit des Marxschen Denkens,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 60, 591–608.Google Scholar
Quante, M., 2004. Hegel’s Concept of Action, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quante, M. and Mooren, N., eds. 2018. Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik, Hamburg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Racionero, Q., 1994. “Politische Aufklärung und Staatstheorie bei Leibniz,” in Buhr, ed., 1994, 517–39.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1973. A Theory of Justice, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1989. “Themes in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” in Kant’s Transcendental Deductions, ed. Förster, Eckart, Stanford.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1986. The Morality of Freedom, Oxford.Google Scholar
Reath, A. and Timmermann, J., eds. 2010. Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. A Critical Guide, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, P. 2009. Continental Idealism. Leibniz to Nietzsche, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, P. 2023. Conceptual Harmonies. The Origins and Relevance of Hegel’s Logic, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. 2014. The Anti-Romantic. Hegel vs. Ironic Romanticism, London.Google Scholar
Renaut, A. 1986. Le système du droit: Philosophie et droit dans la pensée de Fichte, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedel, M. 1984. Between Tradition and Revolution, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Riley, P. 1996. Leibniz’ universal jurisprudence: Justice as the charity of the wise, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, A. 2009. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, J. 1984. Hegel and the French Revolution, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. 2008. Wilhelm von Humboldt and German Liberalism: A Reassessment, Oakville.Google Scholar
Rohls, M. 2004. Kantisches Naturrecht und historisches Zivilrecht. Wissenschaft und bürgerliche Freiheit bei Gottlieb Hufeland (1760–1817), Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
Rojek, T. 2020. “Perfektionistische Gehalte der Rugeschen Geschichtsphilosophie?,” in Perfektionismus der Autonomie, ed. Moggach, D., Mooren, N., and Quante, M., Paderborn, 227–44.Google Scholar
Rose, G. 1981. Hegel Contra Sociology, London.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. 2013. The Idea of Hegel’s Science of Logic, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruda, F. 2011. Hegel’s Rabble, London.Google Scholar
Rutherford, D. 2008. “Leibniz as Idealist” in Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. 4, ed. Garber, D. and Nadler, S., Oxford, 141–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, D. and Cover, J. A., eds. 2005. Leibniz. Nature and Freedom, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1996. “Kant and Stoic Ethics,” in Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics, ed. Engstrom, S. and Whiting, J., Cambridge, 285–301.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. 1998. The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schneider, H.-P. 1967. Justitia universalis, Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
Schui, F. 2013. Rebellious Prussians, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schülein, J.-G. ed. 2020. Hegel-Studien, Bd. 53/54, Schwerpunkt Hegels Rechtsphilosophie.Google Scholar
Schweiger, C. 2001a. “Vollkommenheit als Moralprinzip bei Wolff, Baumgarten und Kant,” in Vernünftkritik und Aufklärung. Studien zr Philosophie Kants und seines Jahrhunderts, ed. Oberhausen, M. et al., Stuttgart, 317–28.Google Scholar
Schweiger, C. 2001b. “Die Anfänge des Projekts einer Metaphysik der Sitten. Zu den Wolffianischen Würzeln einer Kantischen Schlüsselidee,” in Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, 5 vols., ed. Gerhardt, V. et al., Berlin: vol. 2, 52–58.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, S. 2000. The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, S. 2014. Hegel’s Critique of Kant, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom, New York.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Sgarbi, M. 2012. Kant on Spontaneity, London.Google Scholar
Siep, L.. 1979. Anerkennung als Prinzip der praktischen Philosophie, Freiburg/München.Google Scholar
Siep, L.. ed. 1997. G. W. F. Hegel. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, Berlin.Google Scholar
Siep, L.. 2010. Aktualität und Grenzen der praktischen Philosophie Hegels, Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Q. 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. 2 vol., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, G. 2002. “Introduction”, Marx, K., Engels, F., The Communist Manifesto, London.Google Scholar
Stedman Jones, G. 2016. Karl Marx. Greatness and Illusion, Cambridge. MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stipperger, E. 1984. Freiheit und Institution bei Christian Wolff (1679–1754), Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Stolzenberg, J. and Rudolph, O.-P., eds. 2007. Christian Wolff und die Europäische Aufklärung, Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Streisand, J. 1971. Kritische Studien zum Erbe der deutschen Klassik, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. 2014. Why Nudge? The Politics of Liberal Paternalism, Yale.Google Scholar
Sweet, P. R. 1978. Wilhelm Von Humboldt: A Biography, 2 vols., Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1997. “Was Ist Liberalismus?,” in Hegel-Preis, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. 2019. Hegel’s Theory of Normativity, Evanston, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. J., ed. 2015. Constructing Marxist Ethics. Critique, Normativity, Praxis, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, B. 2001, “Permissive Natural Law and Property: Gratian to Kant,” Journal of the History of Ideas 62/3, 381–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmons, M., ed. 2002. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tintemann, U. and Trabant, J.. 2012. Wilhelm von Humboldt. Universalität und Individualität, Paderborn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, K. 1988. Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse, 1750–1840, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tuschling, B. 1998. ‚Die Idee des Rechts: Hobbes und Kant, in Recht, Staat und Völkerrecht bei Immanuel Kant, ed. Hüning, D. and Tuschling, B., Berlin, 85–117.Google Scholar
Tymieniecka, A. T. 1964. Leibniz’s Cosmological Synthesis, Assen.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, M, and Skinner, Q., eds. 2002. Republicanism. A Shared European Heritage 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Velkley, R., 1989. Freedom and the End of Reason, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verweyen, H. J. 1975. Recht und Sittlichkeit in J.G. Fichtes Gesellschaftslehre, Freiburg.Google Scholar
Ware, O. 2020. Fichte’s Moral Philosophy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weckend, J., and Strickland, L., eds. 2020. Leibniz’s Legacy and Impact, Abingdon.Google Scholar
Weisser-Lohmann, E. 2011. Rechtsphilosophie als praktische Philosophie, Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendte, M. 2007. Gottmenschliche Einheit bei Hegel, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, M. 1992. Hegel, Freedom, and Modernity, Albany.Google Scholar
Widdau, C. 2016. Cassirers Leibniz und die Begründung der Menschenrechte, Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, H., ed. 1992. Kant’s Political Philosophy, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Williams, R. R. 1997. Hegel’s Ethics of Recognition, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Wood, A. W. 2014. The Free Development of Each: Studies in Freedom, Right, and Ethics in Classical German Philosophy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. W. 2016. Fichte’s Ethical Thought, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, C. 2012. Freedom and Reflection: Hegel and the Logic of Agency, Oxford.Google Scholar
Yeomans, C. 2015. The Expansion of Autonomy: Hegel’s Pluralistic Philosophy of Action, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, C. 2023. The Politics of German Idealism, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zöller, G. 1998. Fichte’s Transcendental Philosophy: The Original Duplicity of Intelligence and Will, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, R. 2007. Kant on Beauty and Biology, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Douglas Moggach, University of Ottawa and University of Sydney
  • Book: Freedom and Perfection
  • Online publication: 25 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009590419.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Douglas Moggach, University of Ottawa and University of Sydney
  • Book: Freedom and Perfection
  • Online publication: 25 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009590419.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Douglas Moggach, University of Ottawa and University of Sydney
  • Book: Freedom and Perfection
  • Online publication: 25 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009590419.012
Available formats
×