Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Section I Labour law and Europe
- 1 European labour law and the social dimension of the European Union
- 2 EU labour law and the UK
- 3 The conceptualisation of European labour law
- 4 Shifting strategies 1951–1986: ECSC, EEC, harmonisation, financial instruments, qualified majority voting
- 5 The strategy of European social dialogue
- 6 The European Employment Strategy, the open method of coordination and the ‘Lisbon Strategy’
- 7 The strategy of fundamental rights: the EU Charter of Nice 2000 and a ‘constitutional’ strategy
- Section II The structure of European labour law
- Section III The futures of European labour law
- Index
- References
2 - EU labour law and the UK
from Section I - Labour law and Europe
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Section I Labour law and Europe
- 1 European labour law and the social dimension of the European Union
- 2 EU labour law and the UK
- 3 The conceptualisation of European labour law
- 4 Shifting strategies 1951–1986: ECSC, EEC, harmonisation, financial instruments, qualified majority voting
- 5 The strategy of European social dialogue
- 6 The European Employment Strategy, the open method of coordination and the ‘Lisbon Strategy’
- 7 The strategy of fundamental rights: the EU Charter of Nice 2000 and a ‘constitutional’ strategy
- Section II The structure of European labour law
- Section III The futures of European labour law
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction: the ‘British problem’
The United Kingdom occupies a singular position in EU labour law: over the last twenty-eight of its thirty-five years (80 per cent) as a Member State of the EU, British governments have provided the most consistent and effective opposition to the extension of rights for workers and trade unions in EU law. The Conservative government elected in May 1979, first under the leadership of Margaret Thatcher and then John Major, pursued a specific social and labour policy with remarkable consistency and determination throughout that period. The New Labour government elected in May 1997 was committed to a vision of labour law which, in the words of its leader, Tony Blair, ‘would leave British law the most restrictive on trade unions in the western world’.
The consequences of this continuous opposition to labour regulation for the UK's relationship to European labour law – both the impact of EC law on domestic labour law, and also the impact of the social and labour policies of UK governments on the development of EC labour law – have been unmistakable. The mutual impact can be described in terms of a reversal of policy flow: up to 1979, UK domestic labour law policy was influenced in important ways by EC labour law; since 1979, it is EU labour and social policy which has been heavily influenced by domestic UK social and labour policies.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- European Labour Law , pp. 42 - 77Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
, ‘Has New Labour Reconfigured Employment Legislation?’, (2003) 32 Industrial Law Journal 135 at p. 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
concluded: ‘The directive will require little or no change to the law in any Member State apart from the UK’ ‘Protection of Pregnancy and Maternity’, (1993) 22 Industrial Law Journal 63 at p. 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Acquiring Rights – Losing Power: A Case Study of Ministerial Resistance to the Impact of European Community Law’, (1997) 60 Modern Law Review23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘EEC Law in the UK: A New Approach’, (1989) 18 Industrial Law Journal129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Fixed-Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002: Fiddling While Rome Burns?’ (2003) 32 Industrial Law Journal 194, at pp. 198–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Social Charter Action Programme: Progress and Prospects’, (1991) 20 Industrial Law Journal 147, at pp. 148–9Google Scholar
, and , ‘Opting Out of the 48-hour Week: Employer Necessity or Individual Choice? An Empirical Study of the Operation of Article 18(1)(b) of the Working Time Directive in the UK’, (2003) 32 Industrial Law Journal223–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The First Five Years of Britain's Third Statutory Union Recognition Procedure’, (2005) 34 Industrial Law Journal, 345–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Union Recognition Agreements in the Shadow of the Law’,(2004) 34 Industrial Law Journal, 374–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘A European Agenda?’ in (ed.), Employment Rights at Work: Reviewing the Employment Relations Act 1999, Institute of Employment Rights, 2001, 159 at pp. 172–85Google Scholar
and , ‘UK Worker Representation After Single Channel’ (2004) 33 Industrial Law Journal 121–51, at p. 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Council of Europe's Social Charter of 18 October 1961: Britain and the 15th Cycle of Supervision’, (2001) 30 Industrial Law Journal409–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Introduction: EMU and the European Social Model’, in and (eds.), Euros and Europeans: Monetary Integration and the European Model of Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 1–19 at p. 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.