Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Drones on the Ground
- Part II Drones and the Laws of War
- Part III Drones and Policy
- 11 “Bring on the Magic”
- 12 The Five Deadly Flaws of Talking About Emerging Military Technologies and the Need for New Approaches to Law, Ethics, and War
- 13 Drones and Cognitive Dissonance
- 14 Predator Effect
- 15 Disciplining Drone Strikes
- 16 World of Drones
- Part IV Drones and the Future of War
- Index
- References
13 - Drones and Cognitive Dissonance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2014
By
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Drones on the Ground
- Part II Drones and the Laws of War
- Part III Drones and Policy
- 11 “Bring on the Magic”
- 12 The Five Deadly Flaws of Talking About Emerging Military Technologies and the Need for New Approaches to Law, Ethics, and War
- 13 Drones and Cognitive Dissonance
- 14 Predator Effect
- 15 Disciplining Drone Strikes
- 16 World of Drones
- Part IV Drones and the Future of War
- Index
- References
Summary
What Is It About Drones?
There is something about drones that makes sane people crazy. Is it those lean, futurist profiles? The activities drone technologies enable? Or perhaps, it is just the word itself – drone – a mindless, unpleasant, dissonant thrum. Whatever the cause, drones seem to produce an unusual kind of cognitive dissonance in many people.
Some demonize drones, denouncing them for causing civilian deaths or enabling long-distance killing, even as they ignore the fact that the same (or worse) could be said of many other weapons delivery systems. Others glorify them as a low-cost way to “take out terrorists,” despite the strategic vacuum in which most drone strikes occur. Still others insist that US drone policy is just “business as usual,” despite the fact that these attacks may undermine US foreign policy goals while creating an array of new problems.
It is worth taking a closer look at what is and is not new and noteworthy about drone technologies and the activities they enable. Ultimately, “drones,” as such, present few new issues – but the manner in which the United States has been using them raises grave questions about their strategic efficacy and unintended consequences. In fact, the legal theories used to justify many US drone strikes risk dangerously hollowing out the rule of law itself.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Drone WarsTransforming Conflict, Law, and Policy, pp. 230 - 252Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
, and , “A grim portrait of civilian deaths in Iraq,” New York Times, October 23, 2010.
, “Close air support and civilian casualties in Afghanistan,” Small Wars Journal, December 30, 2008.
United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan and UN Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights, Afghanistan Annual Report 2011: Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict, February 2012.
, Armament & history: The influence of armament of history from the dawn of classical warfare to the end of the Second World War (New York, NY: First Da Capo Press, 1998), pp. 91–92.Google Scholar
, and , “A killer above the law?” Guardian, February 8, 2010.
, “Daniel Klaidman on the mind of a drone strike operator,” Daily Beast, June 8, 2012.
, “Sky-high overruns, safety ills plague jet,” Los Angeles Times, August 7, 2011.
, and , “White House defends continuing US role in Libya operation,” New York Times, June 15, 2011.
, “The moral case for drones,” New York Times, June 14, 2012.
, “Do Americans care about civilian deaths in drone attacks?” Mother Jones, August 28, 2012.
, “Take two drones and call me in the morning,” Foreign Policy, September 12, 2012.
, “Increase US drone strikes in Pakistan killing few high-value militants,” Washington Post, February 21, 2011.
, and , “Did the US launch a drone strike on AQIM in northern Mali?” Long War Journal, June 24, 2012.
, “Eliminating Al Qaeda’s No. 3, again,” New York Times, June 1, 2010.
, “Drone attacks create terrorist safe haven, warns former CIA official,” Guardian, June 5, 2012.
, “In Yemen, US airstrikes breed anger, and sympathy for al-Qaeda,” Washington Post, May 29, 2012.
, “Chile seeks US files on 1976 assassination,” New York Times, September 21, 2006.
, “How Is International Human Rights Law enforced?” Indiana Law Journal 74 (1999): 1397–1477.Google Scholar
, “Faction splits from Islamist group in northern Mali,” New York Times, January 24, 2013.
, “International law and the preemptive use of military force,” Washington Quarterly 26 (2003): 89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , “Secret ‘kill list’ proves a test of Obama’s principles and will,” New York Times, May 29 2012.
, “Sovereignty-modern: A new approach to an outdated concept,” American Journal of International Law 97 (2003): 782–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Assassination and targeted killing: A historical and post-Bin Laden legal analysis,” Georgetown Journal of Internal Law 43 (2012): 259–333Google Scholar
, Tell me how this ends: General David Petraeus and the search for a way out of Iraq (New York, NY: PublicAffairs, 2008).Google Scholar
, “What did the Iraq War cost? More than you think,” U.S. News, December 15, 2011.
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 7
- Cited by