Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-s7dlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T20:51:34.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Ulysses Contract

from Part III - Diversity of Desires and Limits of Liberty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2025

Paul J. Ford
Affiliation:
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland
Denise M. Dudzinski
Affiliation:
University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
Get access

Summary

In this chapter of Complex Ethics Consultations: Cases that Haunt Us, the authors describe a 24-year-old patient with C-3 spinal cord injury resulting in quadriplegia and ventilator dependence. He is admitted from a nursing home with multiple serious pressure ulcers. No family or friends who offered him support and companionship. With full decision-making capacity, he declined turning and dressing changes for up to a week. His ulcers were worse and a foul odor emitted from his hospital room. He wanted to live, not risk dying though his choices were doing just that. The ethics consultant negotiated a "Ulysses contract," stipulating that dressing changes and turning would occur once a day and his objections would not be honored. The patient agreed. The authors reflect on the ethical, professional, and haunting conundrum that arose due to this contract.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Complex Ethics Consultations
Cases that Haunt Us
, pp. 84 - 89
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dresser, R. Bound to treatment: The Ulysses contract. Hastings Cent Rep, 1984; 14(3): 1316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srebnik, DS, Rutherford, LT, Peto, T, et al. The content and clinical utility of psychiatric advance directives. Psychiatr Serv, 2005; 56: 592–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spellecy, R. Reviving Ulysses contracts. Kennedy Inst Ethics J, 2003; 13: 373–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, PS, Duermeyer, M, Ehly, C, et al. The “impossible patient”: Organizational response to a clinical problem. J Clin Ethics, 1999; 10: 242–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×