Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-dbm8p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-02T16:36:45.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2025

Edited by
Charles Brittain  and
James Warren
Charles Brittain
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
James Warren
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Cicero's Tusculan Disputations , pp. 189 - 197
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Albrecht, M. von (2007) A History of Roman Literature. 2 vols., Leiden.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (1997) ‘Chrysippus, Carneades, Cicero: the ethical divisiones in Cicero’s Lucullus’, in Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J. eds., Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, Leiden: 107–39.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2022) ‘Radicalism and moderation in the New Academy’, Phronesis 67: 133–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, W. (2016) The Revival of Platonism in Cicero’s Late Philosophy, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
André, J.-M. (1974) ‘Cicéron et Lucrèce: loi du silence et allusions polémiques’, in Mélanges de philosophie, de littérature et d’histoire ancienne offerts à Pierre Boyancé. Rome: 21–38.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1992) Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. (1993) The Morality of Happiness, Oxford.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2007) ‘Carneades’ classification of ethical theories’, in Ioppolo, A. M. and Sedley, D. eds., Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 bc, Naples: 189–223.Google Scholar
Annas, J. and Betegh, G. eds. (2016) Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Annas, J. and Woolf, R. (2001) Cicero: On Moral Ends, Translation and Notes, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (2003) ‘All things to all men: Philodemus’ model of therapy and the audience of De morte’, in Fitzgerald, J., Obbink, D. and Holland, G. eds., Philodemus and the New Testament World, Leiden: 13–54.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. et al. eds. (2004) Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans, Austin.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. and Bénatouïl, T. eds. (2021) The Cambridge Companion to Cicero’s Philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert-Baillot, S. (2018) ‘Terminology and practice of dialectic in Cicero’s letters’, in Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K. eds., Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle, Cambridge: 254–82.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1947) Titi Lucreti Cari: De Rerum Natura Libri Sex, 3 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Balmaceda, C. (2017) Virtus Romana. Politics and Morality in the Roman Historians, Chapel Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2013a) ‘Cicero’s Consolatio ad se: character, purpose, and impact of a curious treatise’, in Baltussen, H. ed., Greek and Roman Consolations. Eight Studies of a Tradition and its Afterlife, Swansea: 67–92.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. ed. (2013b) Greek and Roman Consolations, Swansea.Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. (2012) A Written Republic: Cicero’s Philosophical Politics, Princeton.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1989) ‘Antiochus of Ascalon’, in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. eds., Philosophia Togata I, Oxford: 51–96.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2006) Faire usage, la pratique du stoïcisme, Paris.Google Scholar
Benferhat, Y. (2005) Cives Epicurei: les Épicuriens et l’idée de monarchie à Rome et en Italie de Sylla à Octave, Brussels.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. (2019) Cicero, Greek Learning, and the Making of a Roman Classic, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, D. (2010) ‘Cicero and philosophy as text’, Classical Journal 106: 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2009). ‘Antiochus’ ethics and the subordination of Stoicism’, in Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. eds., The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts, Louvain: 33–54.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M (2012) ‘Antiochus and Platonism’, in Sedley, D. N. ed., The Philosophy of Antiochus, Cambridge: 307–33.Google Scholar
Boyancé, Pierre (1963) Lucrèce et l’épicurisme, Paris.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R., (2013) ‘The Consolatio ad Apollonium: therapy for the dead’, in Baltussen, H. ed., Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and its Afterlife, Swansea: 123–37.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (1998) ‘The Old Stoic theory of emotions’, in Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T. eds., The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, Dordrecht: 21–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. (2002) ‘R. Sorabji, Emotion and Peace of Mind’, Philosophical Books 43: 173–86.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (2003) ‘Stoic moral psychology’, in Inwood, B ed., The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, Cambridge: 257–94.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (2005) The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bringmann, K. (1971) Untersuchungen zum späten Cicero, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2006) Cicero, On Academic Scepticism: Introduction, Translation, and Notes, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2016) ‘Cicero’s sceptical methods: the example of the De Finibus’, in Annas and Betegh 2016: 12–40.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. and Osorio, P. (2021) ‘The Ciceronian dialogue’, in Atkins and Bénatouïl 2021: 25–42.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. and Rowe, C. (2002) Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, trans. C. Rowe, ed. Broadie, S., Oxford.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994) ‘On a Stoic way of not being’, in Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: 158–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappello, O. (2023) ‘The shape of tradition to come: Academic arguments in Cicero’, in Konstan, D., Garani, M., and Reydams-Schils, G. eds., The Oxford Handbook of Roman Philosophy, Oxford: 256–74.Google Scholar
Castner, C. (1988) A Prosopography of Roman Epicureans, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1978) ‘Horace – a Cook?’, CQ 28: 333–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1989) ‘Die Peripatetiker in Cicero’s Tuskulanen’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Steinmetz, P. eds., Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos, New Brunswick 186–200.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1998) Latin Literature: A History, trans. J. Solodow, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (2003) The Fragmentary Latin Poets: Edited with Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
D’Anna, G. (1965 ) Alcuni aspetti della Polemica Antiepicurea di Cicerone, Rome.Google Scholar
Davie, J. (2017) Cicero on Life and Death, Oxford.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. and De Lacy, E. (1978) Philodemus: On Methods of Inference. Naples.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M (1983) ‘Metriopatheia and apatheia: some reflections on a controversy in later Greek ethics’, in Anton, J. P. and Preus, A. eds., Essays in ancient Greek philosophy Vol. II, Albany, 508–17; reprinted in J. Dillon (1990) The Golden Chain: Studies in the Development of Platonism and Christianity, Aldershot: Variorum, 508–17.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1996) The Middle Platonists, 2nd ed., London.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (2003) The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy (347–274 bc), Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougan, T. W. (1905) M. Tulli Ciceronis Tusculanarum Disputationum Libri Quinque, Volume I: Books I and II, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dougan, T. W. and Henry, R. M. (1934) M Tulli Ciceronis Tusculanarum Disputationum Libri, Volume II: Books III–V, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1985) Cicero: Tusculan Disputations I. Warminster.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1990) Cicero. Tusculan Disputations II & V. Warminster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, A. E. (1995) ‘Form and content in the Tusculan Disputations’, in Powell, J. G. F. ed., Cicero the Philosopher, Oxford: 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fohlen, G. and Humbert, J. (1931) Cicéron: Tusculanes, 2 vols., Paris. Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I. (1989) Posidonius, Volume I: The Fragments (2nd edition), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gale, M. ed. (2007) Oxford Readings in Lucretius, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gee, E. (2013a) Aratus and the Astronomical Tradition, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, E. (2013b) ‘Cicero’s poetry’, in Steel, C. ed., The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, Cambridge: 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigante, M. (1983) Ricerche Filodemee, Naples.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. (1985) Cicero, Gespräche in Tusculum, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2015) ‘Among friends: Cicero and the Epicureans’, PhD thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2022) ‘Was Atticus an Epicurean?’, in Davis, G., G. and Yona, S. eds., Epicurus in Rome: Philosophical Perspectives in the Ciceronian Age, Cambridge: 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, N. (2023) ‘Cicero the philosopher at work: the genesis and execution of De Officiis 3’, in Gilbert, N., Graver, M., and McConnell, S. eds., Power and Persuasion in Cicero’s Philosophy, Cambridge: 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2007) Paideia Romana: Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations (Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society Supplementary Volume 30), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2005) ‘Competing readings of Stoic emotions’, in Salles, R. ed., Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought, Oxford: 445–70.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2006) The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. (2020)’Questions and answers: De Finibus and Tusculans 5’, in Müller, G. and Müller, J. eds., Cicero ethicus, Die Tusculanae disputations im Vergleich mit De finibus bonorum et malorum, Heidelberg: 113–34.Google Scholar
Glibert-Thirry, A. (1977) ‘La théorie stoïcienne de la passion chez Chrysippe et son évolution chez Posidonius’, Revue philosophique de Louvain 75: 393–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucker, J. (1978) Antiochus and the Late Academy (Hypomnemata 56), Göttingen.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1988) ‘Cicero’s philosophical affiliations’, in Dillon, J. M. and Long, A. A. eds., The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, Berkley: 34–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucker, J. (1995) ‘Probabile, veri simile, and related terms’, in Powell, J. G. F. ed., Cicero the Philosopher, Oxford 1995: 115–43.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. (2012) The Invention and Gendering of Epicurus, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görler, W. (1996) ‘Zum literarischen Charakter and zur Struktur der Tusculanae’, in Mueller-Goldingen, C. and Sier, K. eds., ΛΗΝΑΙΚΑ: Festschrift für Carl Werner Müller, Stuttgart: 189–216.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (2004) ‘Zum Literarischer Charakter und zur Struktur der Tusculanae disputationes’, in Görler, W. and Catrein, C. eds., Kleine Schriften zur hellenistisch-römischen Philosophie, Leiden: 212–39.Google Scholar
Gorman, R. (2005) The Socratic Method in the Dialogues of Cicero, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gould, J. B. (1970) The Philosophy of Chrysippus, Albany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.–O. (2011) ‘A propos de l’assentiment stoïcien’, in Goulet-Cazé, M.–O. ed., Etudes sur la théorie stoïcienne de l’action, Paris: 73–236.Google Scholar
Graver, M. R. (2002) Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4, Chicago.Google Scholar
Graver, M. R. (2007) Stoicism and Emotion, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, M. R. (2015) ‘Honor and the honorable: Cato’s Discourse in De Finibus 3’, in Annas and Betegh 2016: 119–46.Google Scholar
Graver, M. R. (2023) ‘The psychology of honor in Cicero’s De re publica’, in Gilbert, N., Graver, M., and McConnell, S. eds., Power and Persuasion in Cicero’s Philosophy, Cambridge: 140–69.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (1995) ‘Philosophical badinage in Cicero’s letters to his friends’, in Powell, J. G. F. ed., Cicero the Philosopher, Oxford: 325–46.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S (1990) Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy, Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1992) Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. (2007) ‘Critolaus and Late Hellenistic Peripatetic philosophy’, in Ioppolo, A. M. and Sedley, D. N. eds., Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 B.C., Naples: 47–101.Google Scholar
Hani, J. ed. (1972) Plutarque, Consolation à Apollonios, Texte et Traduction avec Introduction et Commentaire, Paris.Google Scholar
Heine, O. and Pohlenz, M. (1957), Tusculanarum Disputationum libri V, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Henry, W. B. (2009) Philodemus: On Death, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hine, H. (2016) ‘Philosophy and philosophi: from Cicero to Apuleius’, in Williams, G. D. and Volk, K. eds., Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy, Oxford: 13–30.Google Scholar
Hollis, A. (1977) ‘L. Varius Rufus, De morte (Frs. 1–4 Morel)’, Classical Quarterly 27: 187–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, A. (2007) Fragments of Roman Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Howe, H. M. (1951) ‘Amafinius, Lucretius, and Cicero’, American Journal of Philology 72: 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2014a) ‘Ancient goods: the tria genera bonorum in ethical theory’, in Lee, M.-K. ed., Strategies of Argument, Oxford University Press, 255–80.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2014b) Ethics After Aristotle, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B and Donini, P. (1999). ‘Stoic ethics’, in Algra, K. and al. eds., The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: 675–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1967) The Tragedies of Ennius, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. (2012) ‘Speaking with the same voice as reason’, in Barney, R., Brennan, T., and Brittain, C. eds., Plato and the Divided Self, Cambridge: 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamanolis, G. (2020), ‘The primacy of virtue: the transition from De Finibus to Tusculan Disputations 5’, in Mueller and Mueller 2020: 149–72.Google Scholar
Kennedy, S. (2010) ‘Tusculanarum Disputationum de libro primo commentarius’, PhD thesis, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1971) Lucretius: De Rerum Natura Book III, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (2014) Lucretius: De Rerum Natura III, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
King, J. E. (1927) Cicero: Tusculan Disputations, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (2015) ‘Making sense of Stoic indifferents’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49: 227–81.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (2020) ‘Desire and impulse in Epictetus and the Older Stoics’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 103: 121–51.Google Scholar
Koch, B. (2006) Philosophie als Medizin für die Seele: Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Tusculanae Disputationes, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. (1963) Orationis Ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians, and Philosophers, 2 vols., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2008) Philosophie unter der Tyrannis: Ciceros Tusculanae Disputationes, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1992) (2nd ed. 2017), Cicero Academicus: recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie cicéronienne, Rome.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1993) ‘Le concept de doxa des Stoïciens à Philon d’Alexandrie: Essai d’étude diachronique’, in Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. eds., Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: 250–84.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2002) ‘L’Âme et le moi dans les Tusculanes’, Revue des Études Latines 80: 78–94.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2003) ‘Chrysippe dans les Tusculanes’, in Besnier, B., Moreau, P.-F. and Renault, L. eds., Les passions antiques et médiévales, Théories et critiques des passions, vol. 1, Paris: 131–43.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. (1978) ‘Emotion and decision in Stoic psychology’, in Rist, J. ed., The Stoics, Berkeley: 233–46.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1995), ‘Cicero’s Plato and Aristotle’, in Powell, J. G. F. ed., Cicero the Philosopher, Oxford: 37–62, reprinted in A. A. Long, From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, A. G. (2019) Death and Immortality in Ancient Philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackendrick, P. (1989) The Philosophical Books of Cicero, London.Google Scholar
Maso, S. (2008) Capire e dissentire: Cicerone a la filosofia di Epicuro, Naples; English translation (2015) Grasp and Dissent: Cicero and Epicurean Philosophy, Turnhout.Google Scholar
McConnell, S. (2014) Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, S. (2019) ‘Why is Latin spectrum a bad translation of Epicurus’ ΕΙΔΩΛΟΝ? Cicero and Cassius on a point of philosophical translation', Mnemosyne 72: 154–162.Google Scholar
McConnell, S. (2021) ‘Cicero on the emotions and the soul’, in Atkins and Bénatouïl 2021: 150–65.Google Scholar
McDonnell, M. (2003) ‘Roman men and Greek virtue’, in Rosen, R. and Sluiter, I. eds., Andreia. Studies in Manliness and Courage in Classical Antiquity, Leiden: 235–61.Google Scholar
McDonnell, M. (2006) Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Meinwald, C. (2005) ‘Ignorance and opinion in Stoic epistemology’, Phronesis 50: 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mette, H. J. (1984) ‘Zwei Akademiker heute: Krantor von Soloi und Arkesilaos von Pitane’, Lustrum 26: 7–93.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (1973) ‘Rhétorique et philosophie dans les traités de Cicéron’, ANRW 1.3: 139–208.Google Scholar
Minyard, J. D. (1985) Lucretius and the Late Republic: An Essay in Roman Intellectual History, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moraux, P. (1968) ‘La joute dialectique d’après le huitième livre des Topiques’, in Owen, G. E. L. ed., Aristotle on Dialectic. The Topics, Oxford: 277–310.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1973) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias, vol. 1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Moss, J. (2005) ‘Shame, pleasure, and the divided soul’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 137–70.Google Scholar
Müller, G. M. (2020) ‘Continentem orationem audire malo (Cic. Tusc. I, 16). Gesprächsdynamik und römisches Selbstverständnis in den Tusculanae disputationes mit einem Ausblick auf De finibus bonorum et malorum und Ciceros frühe Dialoge’, in Müller, G. M. and Müller, J. eds., Cicero Ethicus. Die Tusculanae Disputationes im Vergleich mit De finibus bonorum et malorum, Heidelberg: 45–111.Google Scholar
Müller, G. M. and Müller, J. eds. (2020) Cicero Ethicus: Die Tusculanae disputationes im Vergleich mit De Finibus bonorum et malorum, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Müller, J. 2020. ‘Mere verbal dispute or serious doctrinal debate? Cicero on the relationship between the Stoics, Peripatetics, and the Old Academy’, in Müller, G. M. and Müller, J. eds., Cicero Ethicus. Die Tusculanae Disputationes im Vergleich mit De finibus bonorum et malorum, Heidelberg: 173–96.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire. Princeton.Google Scholar
Obbink, Dirk (1996) Philodemus: On Piety Part I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2012) ‘Plutarch on the division of the soul’, in Barney, R., Brennan, T. and Brittain, C. eds., Plato and the Divided Self, Cambridge: 311–30.Google Scholar
Pease, A (1955) M. Tulli Ciceronis De natura deorum, 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1909) De Ciceronis Tusculanis disputationibus, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1912) Cicero Tusculanarum Disputationum Libri V, vol. 1, Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F (1995), ‘Cicero’s translations from the Greek’, in Powell, J. G. F. ed., Cicero the Philosopher, Oxford: 273–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, A. W. (2005) ‘Were Zeno and Chrysippus at odds in analyzing emotion?’, in Salles, R. ed., Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji, Oxford: 471–88.Google Scholar
Prost, F. (2004) Les théories hellénistiques de la douleur, Leuven.Google Scholar
Pucci, G. C. (1965) ‘Echi lucreziani in Cicerone’, Studi italiani di filologia classica 38: 70–132.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. (2006) ‘What use is Aristotle’s doctrine of the mean?’, in Reis, B. ed., The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics, Cambridge: 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Reid, J. S. (1885) M. Tulli Ciceronis, Academica, London.Google Scholar
Reid, J. S. (1925) M Tulli Ciceronis De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum Libri I–II, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2021) ‘Cicero’s Academic skepticism’, in Atkins and Bénatouïl 2021: 103–19.Google Scholar
Renaut, O. (2020) ‘In what sense are emotions rational in the Timaeus? (Ti. 42a–b, 69c–72e)’, in Candiotto, L. and Renaut, O. eds., Emotions in Plato, Leiden: 103–22.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2016) ‘Teaching Pericles: Cicero on the study of nature’, in Williams, G. D. and Volk, K.. eds., Roman Reflections, Studies in Latin Philosophy, New York and Oxford: 91–107.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1980) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1998) Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2019) ‘From A Minor to A Major: a reappraisal of the anonymous interlocutor in Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations’, Eikasmós 30: 117–39.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2023) ‘Nos in diem vivimus: the approach of Cicero in the Tusculan Disputations’, in Gilbert, N., Graver, M. and McConnell, S. eds., Power and Persuasion in Cicero’s Philosophy, Cambridge: 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1983), ‘The syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’, Phronesis 28, 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2002) ‘Academic therapy: Philo of Larissa and Cicero’s Project in the Tusculans’, in Clark, G. and Rajak, T. eds., Philosophy and Power in the Greco-Roman World: essays in honour of Miriam Griffin, Oxford: 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2008) ‘Ciceronian dialogue’, in Goldhill, S. ed., The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, Cambridge: 63–84.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2009) Review of Gildenhard (2007), Classical Review 59: 128–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2012) ‘The neutralizing argument: Carneades, Antiochus, Cicero’, in Sedley, D. N. ed., The Philosophy of Antiochus, Cambridge: 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2013) ‘Writing Philosophy’, in Steel, C. ed., The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, Cambridge: 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2021a) ‘Cicero and Plato’, in Atkins and Bénatouïl 2021: 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2021b) ‘Debate or guidance? Cicero on philosophy’, in Leigh, F. ed., Themes in Plato, Aristotle, and Hellenistic Philosophy: Keeling Lectures 2011–2018. London: 131–148; reprinted in in M. Garani, D. Konstan, and G. Reydams-Schils eds. (2023) The Oxford Handbook of Roman Philosophy, Oxford: 119–40.Google Scholar
Schrenk, L. (1994) ‘Cicero on rhetoric and philosophy: Tusculan Disputations I’, Ancient Philosophy 14: 355–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1998) Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2009) ‘Epicureanism in the Roman Republic’, in Warren, J. ed., The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2012) ‘Antiochus as historian of philosophy’, in Sedley, D. N. ed., The Philosophy of Antiochus, Cambridge: 80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2013), ‘Cicero and the Timaeus’, in Schofield, M. ed., Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century bc, Cambridge: 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2019) ‘Epicurus on dialectic’, in Bénatouïl, T., T. and Ierodiakonou, K. eds., Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle, Cambridge: 82–113.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2007) ‘Peripatetics on happiness’, in R. W. Sharples and R. Sorabji eds., Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 bc–200 ad, volume II, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 94: 627–37.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2010) Peripatetic Philosophy 200 bc to ad 200. An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation (Cambridge Source Books in Post-Hellenistic Philosophy), Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stull, W. (2012) ‘Reading the Phaedo in Tusculan Disputations I’, Classical Philology 107: 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarnopolsky, C. H. (2010) Prudes, Perverts and Tyrants: Plato’s Gorgias and the Politics of Shame, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thesleff, H. (1965) The Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period Collected and Edited, Åbo.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. (2003) Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstructions and Interpretations, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouni, G. (2017) ‘Didymus’ Outline of Peripatetic ethics, household management and politics: an edition with translation’, in Fortenbaugh, B. ed., Arius Didymus on Peripatetic Ethics, Household Management, and Politics: Text, Translation, and Discussion, London: 1–67.Google Scholar
Tsouni, G. (2018) ‘Academic and Peripatetic views on natural and moderate passions and a case of intertextuality in Plutarch’, Ploutarchos 15 :109–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouni, G. (2019) Antiochus and Peripatetic Ethics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usener, H. (1887) Epicurea, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Vahlen, J. (1928) Ennius Poesis Reliquiae. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Van Riper, B. W. (1917) ‘Philosophy and education’, The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods 14: 550–54.Google Scholar
Volk, K., (2016), ‘Roman Pythagoras’, in Williams, G. D. and Volk, K. eds., Roman Reflections, Oxford: 33–49.Google Scholar
Volk, K., (2021), The Roman Republic of Letters: Scholarship, Philosophy, and Politics in the Age of Cicero and Caesar, Princeton.Google Scholar
Warmington, E. H. (1936) Remains of Old Latin II: Livius Andronicus, Naevius, Pacuvius, Accius, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2004) Facing Death: Epicurus and His Critics, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, J. (2013) ‘The harm of death in Cicero’s first Tusculan Disputation’, in Stacey Taylor, J. ed., The Metaphysics and Ethics of Death, Oxford: 44–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, J. (2016) ‘Epicurean pleasure in Cicero’s De Finibus’, in Annas and Betegh 2016: 41–76.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2018) ‘Demetrius of Laconia on Epicurus On the Telos (Us. 68)’, in Bryan, J., Wardy, R., and Warren, J. eds., Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy, Cambridge: 202–21.Google Scholar
Watton, M. (2021) ‘Platonis Imitator: Cicero’s reception of Plato’s philosophy’, PhD thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Watton, M. (2022) ‘A Platonic argument for the immortality of the soul in Cicero (Tusculanae Disputationes 1.39–49)’, Classical Quarterly 72: 640–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watton, M. (2023) ‘Cicero, Socrates, and the Fear of Death’, Mnemosyne 76: 456–79.Google Scholar
Weisser, S. (2021) Eradication ou modération des passions: histoire de la controverse entre Stoïciens et Péripatéticiens chez Cicéron, Sénèque et Philon d’Alexandrie, Turnhout.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. (2023) ‘Mos dialogorum: scepticism and fiction in Cicero’s Academica’, in Gilbert, N., Graver, M., and McConnell, S. eds., Power and Persuasion in Cicero’s Philosophy, Cambridge: 52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S. A. (1995) ‘Cicero and the therapists’, in Powell, J. G. F. ed., Cicero the Philosopher. Oxford: 219–46.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2015), Cicero: The Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, J. F. P. (2019a) ‘Cicero’, in Machuca, D. and Reed, B. eds., Skepticism, from Antiquity to the Present, London: 93–101.Google Scholar
Wynne, J. P. F. (2019b) Cicero on the Philosophy of Religion: On the Nature of the Gods and On Divination, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, J. F. P. (2020) ‘Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations: a sceptical reading’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 58: 205–38.Google Scholar
Yona, S. and Gregson, D eds. (2022) Epicurus in Rome: Philosophical Perspectives in the Ciceronian age, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1995) Cicero: De republica. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1998) ‘De re publica and De rerum natura’, in Knox, P. and Foss, C. eds., Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, Stuttgart: 230–47.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2007) ‘The influence of Cicero on Ennius’, in Gowers, E. ed., Ennius Perennis, Cambridge: 1–16.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Charles Brittain, Cornell University, New York, James Warren, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Cicero's <i>Tusculan Disputations</i>
  • Online publication: 11 September 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009586047.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Charles Brittain, Cornell University, New York, James Warren, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Cicero's <i>Tusculan Disputations</i>
  • Online publication: 11 September 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009586047.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Charles Brittain, Cornell University, New York, James Warren, University of Cambridge
  • Book: Cicero's <i>Tusculan Disputations</i>
  • Online publication: 11 September 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009586047.011
Available formats
×