Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-r5qjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-04T21:52:36.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Debate and Contestation in Singapore’s Death Penalty

from Part I - Executing States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2025

Wing-Cheong Chan
Affiliation:
Singapore Management University
Mai Sato
Affiliation:
Birkbeck, University of London
Michael Hor
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

The Singapore Government is well known for its stout defence of the use of capital punishment in the face of international criticism. It recently released studies to support claims of its effective deterrence against drug offending. However, domestic support for the death penalty, evidence for its effectiveness in controlling drug offences, and case law on capital drug offences are more nuanced than what appears at first sight. This chapter examines recent social, political, judicial, and regional developments, which may shape Singapore’s future death penalty policy and practice for drug offences.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

AFP. (2023) ‘Indonesian President grants ‘unprecedented’ clemency to death row drug convict’ The Straits Times (25 April). www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/indonesian-president-grants-unprecedented-clemency-to-death-row-drug-convict.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. (2004) Singapore: The Death Penalty – A Hidden Toll of Executions. www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa36/001/2004/en/.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. (2022) Singapore: Halt Resumption of Unlawful Executions. www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa36/5264/2022/en/.Google Scholar
AP. (2019) ‘Malaysia Backtracks on Plans to Abolish Death Penalty’, AP News (14 March). https://apnews.com/article/--9823fa5ca16f498f9961bac2c37ae4a6.Google Scholar
Bernama. (2023) ‘Death Penalty Not Proven as Best Preventive Measure: Ramkarpal’, New Straits Times (11 April). ww.nst.com.my/news/nation/2023/04/898627/death-penalty-not-proven-best-preventive-measure-ramkarpal-nsttv.Google Scholar
Central Narcotics Bureau. (2014) CNB statement on assessment of the Singapore Cannabis Awareness website to be objectionable (18 February). www.cnb.gov.sg/NewsAndEvents/News/Index/cnb-statement-on-assessment-of-the-singapore-cannabis-awareness-website-to-be-objectionable.Google Scholar
Chan, W. C. (2016) ‘The Death Penalty in Singapore: in Decline but Still Too Soon for Optimism11 Asian Journal of Criminology 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, W. C. (2023) ‘Escape from the Hangman’s Noose? Singapore’s Discretionary Death Penalty for Drug Traffickers24(1) Australian Journal of Asian Law 83.Google Scholar
Chan, W. C., Tan, E. S., Lee, J. T. T. and Mathi, B. (2018) ‘How Strong is Public Support for the Death Penalty in Singapore?13(2) Asian Journal of Criminology 91.Google Scholar
Change.org. (2021) Pardon the Death Sentence of an Intellectually Disabled Man. www.change.org/p/pardon-the-death-sentence-of-an-intellectually-disabled-man.Google Scholar
Channel News Asia. (2023) ‘Authorities Reject Activist Group’s POFMA Appeal Over Facebook Post on Drug Trafficker’s Death Sentence’ (30 May). www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/pofma-transformative-justice-collective-tjc-death-sentence-tangaraju-suppiah-3524656.Google Scholar
Chia, Y. F. (2020) ‘Deterrent Effect of Historical Amendments to Singapore’s Sanction Regime for Drug Trafficking’ Home Team Journal 56. www.mha.gov.sg/docs/hta_libraries/publications/ht-journale-jan-2020-(special-edition).pdf.Google Scholar
Chua, S. C. (1984) ‘Penal Code (Amendment) Bill’, Singapore Parliamentary Debates (26 July). https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/#/topic?reportid=003_19840726_S0002_T0010.Google Scholar
Devaraj, S. (2023) ‘11 Judicial Executions in 2022: None in Previous Two Years’, The Straits Times (9 February). www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/11-judicial-executions-in-2022-none-in-previous-two-years.Google Scholar
Editorial. (2019) ‘Death Does Not Become Us’, The Jakarta Post (17 December). www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2019/12/17/death-does-not-become-us.html.Google Scholar
Hor, M. (1995) ‘The Presumption of Innocence: A Constitutional Discourse for SingaporeSingapore Journal of Legal Studies 365. www.jstor.org/stable/24866862.Google Scholar
Hor, M. (2001) ‘Misuse of Drugs and Aberrations in the Criminal Law13 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 54.Google Scholar
Hor, M. (2011) ‘Criminal Justice in the Chan Court: Change, Contestation and Conservatism in the Court of Appeal’ in Yeo, T. M., Tjio, H. and Tang, H. W. (eds.) SAL Conference 2011: Developments in Singapore Law between 2006 and 2010 (Singapore: Academy Publishing).Google Scholar
Hor, M. (2013) ‘Singapore’s Death Penalty: The Beginning of the End?’ in Hood, R. and Deva, S. (eds.) Confronting Capital Punishment in Asia (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Iau, J. (2022) ‘Thailand Legalising Cannabis Poses More Challenges to S’pore’s Anti-drug Stance: Shanmugam’, The Straits Times (1 September). www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/thailand-legalising-cannabis-poses-more-challenges-to-spores-anti-drug-stance-shanmugam.Google Scholar
Iau, J. and Lim, M. Z. (2022) ‘Generational Shift in S’pore on Cannabis Use Overseas: Survey’, The Straits Times (2 October). www.straitstimes.com/singapore/generational-split-among-sporeans-on-whether-consuming-cannabis-abroad-should-be-illegal-survey.Google Scholar
Jayakumar, S. (1993) ‘Misuse of Drugs (Amendment) Bill’, Singapore Parliamentary Debates (10 November). https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/#/topic?reportid=020_19931110_S0003_T0006.Google Scholar
Kaur, J., Teo, K. S. and Samion, S. (2020) ‘The Impact of Deterrence on the Decision-Making Process of Drug TraffickersHome Team Journal 65.Google Scholar
Kine, P. (2016) ‘Indonesia President Jokowi May Rethink Death Penalty Policy’, Human Rights Watch (10 November), www.hrw.org/news/2016/11/10/indonesia-president-jokowi-may-rethink-death-penalty-policy.Google Scholar
Lee, D. (2022) ‘Schooling, Lim Treated “in the Same Way” as Others in Cannabis Use Investigation: Shanmugam’, The New Paper (31 August). https://tnp.straitstimes.com/sports/swimming/schooling-lim-treated-same-way-others-cannabis-use-investigation-shanmugam.Google Scholar
Levitt, S. D. (2004) ‘Understanding Why Crime Fell in the 1990s18(1) Journal of Economic Perspectives 163.Google Scholar
Loheswar, R. (2022) ‘Five Hanged in Last Decade, Nine More in Line: A Look at Malaysians Facing Gallows in Singapore for Drug Offences’ Malay Mail (29 April), www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2022/04/29/five-hanged-in-last-decade-nine-more-in-line-a-look-at-malaysians-facing-ga/2056200.Google Scholar
Low, J. Y. (2022) ‘300–400 People Attend Candlelight Vigil at Hong Lim Park for M’sian Drug Traffickers on Death Row’, Mothership (26 April). https://mothership.sg/2022/04/candlelight-vigil-nagaenthran-datchinamurthy/.Google Scholar
Masagos, Z. (2012) ‘Misuse of Drugs (Amendment) Bill’, Singapore Parliamentary Debates (14 November). https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/#/sprs3topic?reportid=bill-32.Google Scholar
Ministry of Home Affairs. (2022a) Findings from Recent Studies on the Death Penalty in Singapore (19 October). www.mha.gov.sg/mediaroom/press-releases/findings-from-recent-studies-on-the-death-penalty-in-singapore/.Google Scholar
Ministry of Home Affairs. (2022b) Statement by the Ministry of Home Affairs in Response to the International Drug Policy Consortium’s Article on the Use of Capital Punishment Against Drug-Related Offences (25 November). www.mha.gov.sg/mediaroom/press-releases/statement-by-the-ministry-of-home-affairs-in-response-to-the-international-drug-policy-consortium-article-on-the-use-of-capital-punishment-against-drug-related-offences.Google Scholar
NST Online. (2018) ‘Death Penalty to be abolished’, New Straits Times (10 October). www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2018/10/419931/death-penalty-be-abolished.Google Scholar
Ong, B. J. (2019) ‘Looking Beyond the Vague Terms in Singapore’s Fake News Laws’, Today (14 May). www.todayonline.com/commentary/looking-beyond-vague-terms-fake-news-laws.Google Scholar
Ong, J. (2022a) “Joseph Schooling’s Confession to Cannabis Use a ‘Setback’ for Singapore’s Fight Against Drugs: Shanmugam”, Today (1 September). www.todayonline.com/singapore/joseph-schooling-cannabis-singapore-fight-against-drugs-shanmugam-1982146.Google Scholar
Ong, J. (2022b) ‘3rd National Swimmer, Teong Tzen Wei, Took Drugs Overseas; SportSG Suspends Support to Errant Swimmers’, Today (28 September). www.todayonline.com/singapore/third-national-swimmer-used-drugs-abroad-sportsg-2005276.Google Scholar
Ong, J. (2023) ‘Explainer: How Will Malaysia’s Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Affect Crime Rates, and Will S’pore Face Pressure to Follow Suit?’, Today (4 April). www.todayonline.com/singapore/explainer-msia-mandatory-death-penalty-abolish-crime-rates-2144491.Google Scholar
Sato, M. (2023) Singapore’s Death Penalty for Drug Trafficking: What the Research Says and Doesn’t. www.academia.sg/academic-views/review-of-death-penalty-research/.Google Scholar
Shanmugam, K. (2021) Written Reply to Parliamentary Question on the Case of Mr David Roach. www.mha.gov.sg/mediaroom/parliamentary/written-reply-to-pq-on-the-case-of-mr-david-roach/.Google Scholar
Shanmugam, K. (2022a) ‘Reasons for Not Disclosing Racial Composition of Prison Inmate Population and Criminal Offender Figures’, Singapore Parliamentary Debates (4 July). https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/#/sprs3topic?reportid=oral-answer-2842.Google Scholar
Shanmugam, K. (2022b) Transcript of Sydney Morning Herald’s Interview with Mr K Shanmugam, Minister for Home Affairs and Minister for Law, on 15 September 2022. www.mha.gov.sg/mediaroom/speeches/transcript-of-sydney-morning-herald-interview-with-mr-k-shanmugam-on-15-september-2022/.Google Scholar
Strangio, S. (2023) ‘Malaysia Announces Plans to Decriminalize Minor Drug Offenses’, The Diplomat (17 May). https://thediplomat.com/2023/05/malaysia-announces-plans-to-decriminalize-minor-drug-offenses/.Google Scholar
Tan, T., Rahimy, R. and Carvalho, M. (2023) ‘“Nay” to Mandatory Death Penalty’, The Star (4 April). www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/04/04/nay-to-mandatory-death-penalty.Google Scholar
Tang, L. (2022) ‘AGC Flags Possible Contempt of Court Action Over ‘False Claims’ in Failed Bid to Halt Drug Trafficker’s Execution’, Today (27 April). www.todayonline.com/singapore/agc-contempt-court-action-false-claims-drug-trafficker-execution-1884306.Google Scholar
Tang, L. (2023) ‘New Laws Passed to Increase Penalties for Drug Possession, Better Tackle Psychoactive Substances’, Channel News Asia (21 March). www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/new-laws-passed-increase-penalties-drug-possession-better-tackle-psychoactive-substances-3362596.Google Scholar
Tee, K. (2023) ‘A Brief History of Malaysia’s Capital Punishment and Death Row Inmates’, Malay Mail (3 April). www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2023/04/03/a-brief-history-of-malaysias-capital-punishment-and-death-row-inmates/62376.Google Scholar
Teo, C. H. (2012) ‘Misuse of Drugs (Amendment) Bill’, Singapore Parliamentary Debates (14 November). https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/#/sprs3topic?reportid=bill-38.Google Scholar
Teo, K. X. (2021) ‘Civil Society Responses to Singapore’s Online “Fake News’ Law”15 International Journal of Communication 4795.Google Scholar
The Jakarta Post. (2023) ‘New Penal Code Offers Hope of Abolishing Death Penalty in Indonesia’, The Star (17 May). www.thestar.com.my/aseanplus/aseanplus-news/2023/05/17/new-penal-code-offers-hope-of-abolishing-death-penalty-in-indonesia.Google Scholar
Warr, P. (2023) ‘Thailand’s Cannabis Decriminalisation and Subsequent Unregulated Industry’, Thailand Business News (25 March). www.thailand-business-news.com/opinion/97257-thailands-cannabis-decriminalisation-and-subsequent-unregulated-industry.Google Scholar
Wongcha-um, P. (2024) ‘Thailand’s Flourishing Cannabis Culture to End as Government Seeks Ban’, Reuters (15 March). www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/thailand-cannabis/.Google Scholar
Yang, K. (2021) ‘Is Safekeeping Drug Trafficking? The Singapore Court of Appeal’s Attempt to Delineate Role and Culpability in Drug Trafficking Offenses24(1) New Criminal Law Review 90.10.1525/nclr.2021.24.1.90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimring, F. E., Fagan, J. and Johnson, D. T. (2010) ‘Executions, Deterrence and Homicide: A Tale of Two Cities7(1) Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA

The PDF of this book complies with version 2.2 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range of users and attains the highest (AAA) level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive accessibility guidelines.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×