Western and Central Asia: Languages

doi:10.1017/CHO9781139017831.101

3.16 - Western and Central Asia: Languages

from VII. - Western and Central Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2014

Paul Heggarty and

Colin Renfrew

Edited by

Colin Renfrew and

Paul Bahn

Show author details

Paul Heggarty: Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Colin Renfrew: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Colin Renfrew: Affiliation:
University of Cambridge

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Overview and Worldwide Context

Western and Central Asia are a part of the world especially significant to our understanding of deep linguistic prehistory – not only its own, but also that of the continents that surround it. Nowhere more closely than here, moreover, might archaeology and linguistics go hand in hand, for Western Asia is also the repository of many of the oldest written records in any languages, inscribed in what are among the earliest of all writing systems. So here historical linguistics is by no means limited to its abstract reconstructions of individual words in isolation, but enjoys detailed, continuous texts – unearthed, moreover, in rich archaeological contexts. The linguistic data they harbour attest directly to how, in language just as on other levels, the western and central regions of Asia long played the role of a nexus for the continents that surround them.

Still today, Western Asia is home to representatives of two of the broadest and oldest of all language families, and those whose past we best understand, thanks in large part to how far back we can trace them here. The great geographical spread of Indo-European, from Iceland to the Bay of Bengal, is centred here, as too are its earliest known texts that first bring the family into recorded history. Most notable is the language of a veritable library of tablets in cuneiform script, discovered in the early 20th century at the former Hittite capital in Central Anatolia, and whose subsequent decipherment brought far-reaching revisions to our understanding of the Indo-European family as a whole, and its deep prehistory. This has since been complemented by the progressive realisation that all of the earliest attested languages within Asia Minor westwards of Hittite are its sisters, within a broader “Anatolian” branch of Indo-European.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge World Prehistory , pp. 1678 - 1700

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHO9781139017831.101 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anthony, D. W. 2007. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.

Anttila, R. 1989. Historical and Comparative Linguistics, 2nd rev. ed. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.

Beekes, R. S. P. 1995. Comparative Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.

Bellwood, P. 2005. First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies. Blackwell: Oxford.

Bouckaert, R., Lemey, P., Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., Alekseyenko, A. V., Drummond, A. J., Gray, R. D., Suchard, M. A. & Atkinson, Q. D. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337 (6097): 957–60.Google Scholar

Bryant, E. 2003. The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Campbell, L. & Poser, W. J. 2008. Language Classification: History and Method. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Carruba, O. 1995. L’arrivo dei greci, le migrazioni indoeuropee e il “ritorno” degli Eraclidi. Athenaeum NS 83: 5–44.Google Scholar

Childe, V. G. 1926. The Aryans: A Study of Indo-European Origins. Kegan Paul, Trench & Trubner: London.

Clackson, J. 1994. The Linguistic Relationship Between Armenian and Greek. Blackwell: Oxford.

Clackson, J. 2007. Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Coleman, R. 1988. Review of Renfrew (1987): Archaeology and Language. Current Anthropology 29 (3): 449–53.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 2008. Linguistic diversity in the Caucasus. Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 131–43.Google Scholar

Degener, A. 2002. The Nuristani languages, pp. 103–17 in (Sims-Williams, N., ed.) Indo-Iranian Languages and Peoples. British Academy/Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Deutscher, G. 2007. Syntactic Change in Akkadian: The Evolution of Sentential Complementation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Diakonoff, I. M. & Starostin, S. A. 1986. Hurro-Urartian as an Eastern Caucasian Language. R. Kitzinger: Munich.

Diamond, J. M. 1991. The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee. Hutchinson: London.

Diamond, J. M. 1997. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. W. W. Norton: New York.

Diamond, J. M. & Bellwood, P. 2003. Farmers and their languages: the first expansions. Science 300 (5619): 567–603.

Dixon, R. M. W. 1997. The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Emmerick, R. 1992. Iranian, pp. 289–345 in (J. Gvozdanović, ed.) Indo-European Numerals. de Gruyter: Berlin.

Evershed, R. P., Payne, S., Sherratt, A. G., Copley, M. S., Coolidge, J., Urem-Kotsu, D., Kotsakis, K., Özdogan, M., Özdogan, A. E., Nieuwenhuyse, O., Akkermans, P. M. M. G., Bailey, D., Andeescu, R.-R., Campbell, S., Farid, S., Hodder, I., Nurcan, Y., Özbaşaran, M., Bıçakcı, E., Garfinkel, Y., Levy, T. & Burton, M. M. 2008. Earliest date for milk use in the Near East and southeastern Europe linked to cattle herding. Nature 455: 528–31.Google Scholar

Finkelberg, M. 1997. Anatolian languages and Indo-European migrations to Greece. Classical World 91 (1): 3–20.Google Scholar

Gamkrelidze, T. V. & Ivanov, V. V. 1995. Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A Reconstruction and Historical Analysis of a Proto-Language and a Proto-Culture. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.

Gimbutas, M. 1960. Culture change in Europe at the start of the second millennium b.c., pp. 540–52 in (Wallace, A. F. C., ed.) Men and Cultures: Selected Papers of the Fifth International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia.

Gimbutas, M. 1963. The Indo-Europeans, archaeological problems. American Anthropologist 65: 815–36.Google Scholar

Gimbutas, M. 1970. Proto-Indo-European culture: the Kurgan culture during the 5th to the 3rd millennia b.c., pp. 155–98 in (Cardona, G., Koenigswald, H. M., & Senn, A., eds.) Indo-European and Indo-Europeans. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia.

Gray, R. D. & Atkinson, Q. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426 (6965): 435–9.Google Scholar

Heggarty, P. 2006. Interdisciplinary indiscipline? Can phylogenetic methods meaningfully be applied to language data – and to dating language?, pp. 183–94 in (Forster, P. & Renfrew, C., eds.) Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.

Hrozný, B. Forthcoming. Prehistory by Bayesian phylogenetics? The state of the art on Indo-European origions. Antiquity.

Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. G. 2010. Agriculture and language dispersals: limitations, refinements, and an Andean exception? Current Anthropology 51 (2): 163–91.Google Scholar

Heggarty, P., Maguire, W. & McMahon, A. 2010. Splits or waves? Trees or webs? How divergence measures and network analysis can unravel language histories, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365: 3829–43, special issue on Cultural and Linguistic Diversity (Steele, J., Jordan, P. & Cochrane, E., eds.).Google Scholar

Hrozný, B. 1917. Die Sprache der Hethiter: ihr Bau und ihre Zugehörigkeit zum indogermanishen Sprachstamm. J. C. Hinrichs: Leipzig.

Hrozný, B. 1931. L’Entrainement des chevaux chez les anciens Indo-Européens d’après un texte Mitannien-Hittite provenant du 14ème siècle av. J.C. Archiv Orientalni 3: 431–61.

Huehnergard, J. & Woods, C. 2004. Akkadian and Eblaite, pp. 218–80 in (Woodard, R. D., ed.) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World’s Ancient Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Ivanov, V. V. 1985. Ob otnošenii xattskogo jazyka k severozapadnokavkavzskim. Drevnaja Anatolija 2: 25–59.Google Scholar

Janhunen, J. 2003. The Mongolic Languages. Routledge: London.

Johanson, L. & Johanson, É. Á. C. (eds.) 1998. The Turkic Languages. Routledge: London.

Kitchen, A., Ehret, C., Assefa, S. & Mulligan, C. J. 2009. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of Semitic languages identifies an Early Bronze Age origin of Semitic in the Near East. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276: 2703–10.Google Scholar

Kornfilt, J. 2009. Turkish and the Turkic languages, pp. 519–44 in (Comrie, B., ed.) The World’s Major Languages. Routledge: London.

Kramer, S. N. 1988. History Begins at Sumer: Thirty-Nine Firsts in Recorded History. 3rd ed. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia.

Krell, K. S. 1998. Gimbutas’ Kurgan-PIE homeland hypothesis: a linguistic critique, pp. 267–82 in (Blench, R. & Spriggs, M., eds.) Archaeology and Language II: Archaeological Data and Linguistic Hypotheses. Routledge: London.

Levine, M., Rassamakin, Y., Keslenko, A. & Tatarintseva, N. (eds.) 1999. Late Prehistoric Exploitation of the Eurasian Steppe. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.

Luraghi, S. 1998. The Anatolian languages, pp. 169–96 in (Ramat, A. G. & Ramat, P., eds.) The Indo-European Languages. Routledge: London.

Mallory, J. P. 1989. In Search of the Indo-Europeans. Thames & Hudson: London.

Mallory, J. P. 1998. A European perspective on Indo-Europeans in Asia, pp. 175–201 in (Mair, V. H., ed.) The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Peoples of Eastern Central Asia. Institute for the Study of Man: Washington, DC. 2013. Twenty-first century clouds over Indo-European homelands. Journal of Language Relationship 9: 145–54.

Mallory, J. P. & Mair, V. H. 2008. The Tarim Mummies: Ancient China and the Mystery of the Earliest Peoples from the West. Thames & Hudson: London.

McAlpin, D. W. 1974. Toward Proto-Elamo-Dravidian. Language 50 (1): 89–101.Google Scholar

Melchert, C. Forthcoming. The position of Anatolian, in (Weiss, M. & Garrett, A., eds.) The Handbook of Indo-European Studies. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Militarev, A. 2002. The prehistory of a dispersal: the Proto-Afrasian (Afroasiatic) farming lexicon, pp. 135–51 in (Bellwood, P. & Renfrew, C., eds.) Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research: Cambridge.

Nasidze, I., Sarkisian, T., Kerimov, A. & Stoneking, M. 2003. Testing hypotheses of language replacement in the Caucasus: evidence from the Y-chromosome. Human Genetics 112 (3): 255–61.Google Scholar

Nettle, D. 1999. Linguistic Diversity. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Nichols, J. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

Nichols, J. 1997. Modeling ancient population structures and movement in linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 359–84.Google Scholar

Pulgram, E. 1958. The Tongues of Italy. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

Ray, J. D. 1990. An outline of Carian grammar. Kadmos 29 (1): 54–83.Google Scholar

Renfrew, C. 1987. Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins. Jonathan Cape: London.

Renfrew, C. 1998. All the king’s horses: assessing cognitive maps in later prehistoric Europe, pp. 192–211 in (Mithen, S. J., ed.) Creativity in Human Evolution and Prehistory. Routledge: London.

Renfrew, C. 2001. The Anatolian origins of Proto-Indo-European and the autochtony of the Hittites, pp. 36–63 in (Drews, R., ed.) Greater Anatolia and the Indo-Hittite Language Family. Journal of Indo-European Studies Monographs. Institute for the Study of Man: Washington, DC.

Ringe, D. A., Warnow, T. & Taylor, A. 2002. Indo-European and computational cladistics. Transactions of the Philological Society 100 (1): 59–129.Google Scholar

Robinson, O. W. 1992. Old English and Its Closest Relatives. Routledge: London.

Schrader, O. 1890. Prehistoric Antiquities of the Aryan Peoples. Scribner & Welford: New York.

Sherratt, A. & Sherratt, S. 1988. The archaeology of Indo-European: an alternative view. Antiquity 62 (236): 584–95.Google Scholar

Sims-Williams, N. 1998. The Iranian languages, pp. 125–53 in (Ramat, A. G. & Ramat, P., eds.) The Indo-European Languages. Routledge: London.

Sims-Williams, P. 1998. Genetics, linguistics, and prehistory: thinking big and thinking straight. Antiquity 277: 505–27.Google Scholar

Starostin, S. A. 1991. On the hypothesis of a genetic connection between the Sino-Tibetan languages and the Yeniseian and North-Caucasian languages, pp. 12–41 in (Shevoroshkin, V. V., ed.) Nostratic, Dene-Caucasian, Austric and Amerind: Materials from the First International Interdisciplinary Symposium on Language and Prehistory, Ann Arbor, 8–12 November, 1988. Brockmeyer: Bochum.

Sturtevant, E. H. 1933. A Comparative Grammar of the Hittite Language. Linguistic Society of America: Philadelphia.

Thieme, P. 1960. The “Aryan” Gods of the Mitanni Treaties. Journal of the American Oriental Society 80 (4): 301–17.Google Scholar

Trask, R. L. 2000. Dictionary of Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Routledge: London.

Watkins, C. 2004. Hittite, pp. 551–75 in (Woodard, R. D., ed.) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World’s Ancient Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Woodard, R. D. (ed.) 2004. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World’s Ancient Languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.