Book contents
- The Cambridge History of the Holocaust
- The Cambridge History Of The Holocaust
- The Cambridge History of the Holocaust
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Contributors to Volume IV
- Abbreviations
- Additional material
- General Editor’s Introduction
- Introduction to Volume IV
- Part I History
- Part II Geography
- Part III Culture and Ideas
- Part IV Culture and Fields
- 18 Holocaust Commemoration and Memorials
- 19 Holocaust Museums
- 20 The Holocaust and the Medical Professions
- 21 Holocaust Literature
- 22 The Holocaust and the Visual Arts: Perplexity, Meanings
- 23 The Holocaust and Film
- 24 The Future of the Holocaust – Timely Reflections
- Index
- References
20 - The Holocaust and the Medical Professions
from Part IV - Culture and Fields
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2025
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge History of the Holocaust
- The Cambridge History Of The Holocaust
- The Cambridge History of the Holocaust
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Contributors to Volume IV
- Abbreviations
- Additional material
- General Editor’s Introduction
- Introduction to Volume IV
- Part I History
- Part II Geography
- Part III Culture and Ideas
- Part IV Culture and Fields
- 18 Holocaust Commemoration and Memorials
- 19 Holocaust Museums
- 20 The Holocaust and the Medical Professions
- 21 Holocaust Literature
- 22 The Holocaust and the Visual Arts: Perplexity, Meanings
- 23 The Holocaust and Film
- 24 The Future of the Holocaust – Timely Reflections
- Index
- References
Summary
The core idea in this chapter is that there was a substantial, transnational, effort to rethink medical ethics – how it was framed by, taught to, and practiced by health professionals such as physicians – after the Holocaust. Because of the intense involvement of medical professionals in the Holocaust, both in the extermination process and through medical experimentation, there was a widespread sense after 1945 that the medical profession needed to rethink its ethical foundations. The chapter in particular highlights postwar currents in east-central European ethical thought, which engaged its own indigenous tradition of medical ethics (“deontology” as it was called) in ways that sometimes went beyond the parallel but more familiar debates in western Europe and the USA. The Holocaust informed – but did not determine – the evolution of biomedical ethics throughout the postwar period. Such thinking was also, necessarily, shaped by other currents – economic, political, and scientific – such that it is hard to say that medicine has “learned the lessons of the Holocaust,” at least not completely.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of the Holocaust , pp. 467 - 489Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Select Bibliography
Annas, G.J., American Bioethics: Crossing Human Rights and Health Law Boundaries (Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Annas, G.J. and Grodin, M. A. (eds.), The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation (New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörner, K., Ebbinghaus, A., and Linne, K (eds.), The Nuremberg Medical Trial 1946/47: Transcripts, Material of the Prosecution and Defense, Related Documents (Munich, K. G. Saur Verlag, 1999) (microfiche).Google Scholar
Jonas, H., ‘Philosophical reflections on experimenting with human subjects’, Dædalus 98 (1969), 219–47.Google Scholar
Kielanowski, T., ‘Kodeks deontologiczny polskiej służby zdrowia’, Służba zdrowia 12–13 (1959), 2–3.Google Scholar
Löwy, I., ‘Ludwik Fleck: On medical experiments on human beings’, Science, Technology & Human Values 41 (2016), 534–46.Google Scholar
Löwy, I., The Polish School of Philosophy of Medicine: From Tytus Chalubinski (1820–1889) to Ludwik Fleck (1896–1961) (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 2011).Google Scholar
Mitscherlich, A. and Mielke, F. (eds.), Das Diktat der Menschenverachtung: Der Nürnberger Ärzteprozeß und seine Quellen (Heidelberg, Lambert Schneider, 1947).Google Scholar
Mitscherlich, A. and Mielke, F. (eds.), Medizin ohne Menschlichkeit: Dokumente des Nürnberger Ärzteprozesses (Frankfurt am Main, Fischer Verlag, 1960).Google Scholar
Moreno, J.D., Sándor, J., and Schmidt, U., ‘Autonomy and social responsibility: The post-pandemic challenge’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 65 (2022), 426–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, J.D., Schmidt, U., and Joffe, S., ‘The Nuremberg Code seventy years later’, Journal of the American Medical Association 318 (2017), 795–6.Google Scholar
Moreno, J.D., Undue Risk: Secret State Experiments on Humans (New York, W. H. Freeman, 1999).Google Scholar
Pappworth, M.H., Human Guinea Pigs: Experimentation on Man (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967).Google Scholar
Péteri, G., ‘Nylon Curtain: Transnational and transsystemic tendencies in the cultural life of state-socialist Russia and East-Central Europe’, Slavonica 10:2 (2004), 113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platen-Hallermund, A., Die Tötung Geisteskranker in Deutschland (Frankfurt am Main, Psychiatrie-Verlag 1998 [1948]).Google Scholar
Płonka-Syroka, B. and Kaźmierczak, A., ‘Polish School of Philosophy of Medicine – between the philosophy of science and clinical practice’, in Erdemir Demirhan, A., Erer, S., Usmanbaş, Ö, and Akgün, B. (eds.), 5th Balkan Congress on the History & Ethics of Medicine/5. Balkan Tıp Tarihi ve Etiği Kongresi (Istanbul, Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2011), pp. 242–7.Google Scholar
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, “Ethically Impossible” STD Research in Guatemala from 1946 to 1948 (Washington, D.C., Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, 2011), https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcsbi/node/654.html.Google Scholar
Proctor, R.N., Racial Hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Proctor, R.N., The Nazi War on Cancer (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, U., Frewer, A., and Sprumont, D. (eds.), Ethical Research: The Declaration of Helsinki – Past, Present and Future of Human Experimentation (Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Schmidt, U. and Frewer, A. (eds.), History and Theory of Human Experimentation: The Declaration of Helsinki and Modern Medical Ethics (Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 2007).Google Scholar
Schmidt, U., Justice at Nuremberg: Leo Alexander and the Nazi Doctors’ Trial (Basingstoke and New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, U., Karl Brandt: The Nazi Doctor. Medicine and Power in the Third Reich (London, Continuum, 2007).Google Scholar
Schmidt, U., ‘Medical ethics and Nazism’, in McCullough, L. B. and Baker, R. (eds.), The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics (Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 595–608.Google Scholar
Schmidt, U., Secret Science: A Century of Poison Warfare and Human Experiments (Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
U. Schmidt, ‘Thanatology and the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial: Conceptualizing the “science of killing”’, in H. Reginbogin and M. J. Breger (eds.), Nuremberg Principles and Ukraine: The Contemporary Challenges to Peace, Security, and Justice (Lanham, Lexington Books, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Schmidt, U. and Wahl, M., ‘Doctors and research behind the Iron Curtain: Medical ethics debates and the Declaration of Helsinki in East Germany (1961–1989)’, in Schmidt, U., Frewer, A., and Sprumont, D. (eds.), Ethical Research: The Declaration of Helsinki – Past, Present and Future of Human Experimentation (Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 167–89.Google Scholar
Weindling, P. J., ‘Human guinea pigs and experimental ethics: The BMJ ’s foreign correspondent at the Nuremberg Medical Trial’, British Medical Journal 313 (1996), 1467–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.