Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mwwwr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-10T09:14:26.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2025

Louise Kennefick
Louise Kennefick
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The Boundaries of Blame
Towards a Universal Partial Defence for the Criminal Law
 , pp. 283 - 324
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Alexander, L. ‘Retributive Justice’ in Olsaretti, S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Alexander, L. & Ferzan, K., Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law, Morse, S. contrib. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).10.1017/CBO9780511804595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. ‘Justifying the Capabilities Approach to Justice’ in Brighouse, H. & Robeyns, I. (eds.), Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Anderson, E. The Imperative of Integration (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010).10.1515/9781400836826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. ‘Autonomy and Vulnerability Entwined’ in Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Anderson, J. & Honneth, A., ‘Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice’ in Christman, J. & Anderson, J. (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Appiah, K. A. The Ethics of Identity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Ashworth, A. Positive Obligations (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar
Ashworth, A. Principles of Criminal Law, 3rd edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Ashworth, A. Principles of Criminal Law, 5th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Azmanova, A. Capitalism on Edge: How Fighting Precarity Can Achieve Radical Change Without Crisis or Utopia (New York: Columbia University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Barclay, G. ‘Law, Emotions, and “Reactive Defences”’ in Crofts, T., Kennefick, L., & Loughnan, A. (eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Criminal Responsibility (London: Routledge, 2025).Google Scholar
Baron, M. ‘Reframing the Issues: Differing Views of Justification and the Feminist Critique of Provocation’ in Robinson, P., Ferzan, K., & Garvey, S. (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Barry, B. Why Social Justice Matters (New York: Polity Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. On Crimes and Punishment, Grigson, J. (trans.) (Venice: Marsilio, 1996 [1764]).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. ‘The Utilitarian Theory of Punishment’ in Bentham, J. with Burns, J. H. & Hart, H. L. A. (eds.), An Introduction to Principles of Morals and Legislation (London: Athlone, 1970 [1789]).Google Scholar
Bentham, J. The Principles of Morals and Legislation (Ontario: Batoche Books, 2000 [1789]).Google Scholar
Berlin, I. Two Concepts of Liberty (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Berman, M. N. ‘Modest Retributivism’ in Ferzan, K. K. & Morse, S. J. (eds.), Legal, Moral, and Metaphysical Truths: The Philosophy of Michael S. Moore (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Berman, M. N. ‘Two Kinds of Retributivism’ in Duff, R. A. & Green, S. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Billis, E., Knust, N., & Rui, J. P., ‘The Typology of Proportionality’ in Billis, E., Knust, N., & Rui, J. P. (eds.), Proportionality in Crime Control and Criminal Justice (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2021).10.5040/9781509938636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom-Cooper, L. & Morris, T., With Malice Aforethought: A Study of the Crime and Punishment for Homicide (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar
Bohlander, M. ‘When the Bough Breaks – Defences and Sentencing Options Available in Battered Women and Similar Scenarios Under German Law’ in Reed, A. & Bohlander, M. (eds.), Loss of Control and Diminished Responsibility: Domestic, Comparative and International Perspectives (London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
Bottoms, A. ‘Penal Censure, Repentance and Desistance’ in du Bois-Pedain, A. & Bottoms, A. (eds.), Penal Censure: Engagements Within and Beyond Desert Theory (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019).Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. Crime, Shame, and Reintegration (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989).10.1017/CBO9780511804618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. & Pettit, P., Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198240563.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briguglio, L., Cordina, G., Farrugia, N., & Vella, S., ‘Economic Vulnerability and Resilience: Concepts and Measurements’ in Naude, W., Santos-Paulino, A., & McGillivray, M. (eds.), Measuring Vulnerability in Developing Countries: New Analytical Approaches (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Brink, D. O. Fair Opportunity and Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).10.1093/oso/9780198859468.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, D. O. ‘Partial Responsibility and Excuse’ in Hurd, H. M. (ed.), Moral Puzzles and Legal Perplexities: Essays on the Influence of Larry Alexander (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Brink, D. O. & Nelkin, D. K., ‘Fairness and the Architecture of Responsibility’ in Shoemaker, D. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, Vol. 1 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Brink, D. O. & Nelkin, D. K., ‘The Nature and Significance of Blame’ in Vargas, M. & Doris, J. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).Google Scholar
Brudner, A. Punishment and Freedom: A Liberal Theory of Penal Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207251.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, E. M. & Hunt, P. M. A., South African Criminal Law and Procedure, Vol. I (Cape Town: Juta, 1997).Google Scholar
Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991).10.7208/chicago/9780226028811.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchell, J. M. & Milton, J., Principles of Criminal Law, revised edn (Cape Town: Juta & Co., 1994).Google Scholar
Butler, J. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence (London: Verso, 2004).Google Scholar
Campbell, L., Kilcommins, S., & O’ Sullivan, C., Criminal Law in Ireland: Cases and Commentary, 2nd edn (Dublin: Clarus Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Carlen, P. & França, L. A. (eds.), Justice Alternatives (London: Routledge, 2019).10.4324/9780429468179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, G. D. Rejecting Retributivism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).10.1017/9781108689304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, J. Legal Defences for Battered Women Who Kill: The Battered Woman Syndrome, Expert Testimony and Law Reform, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis (Edinburgh University, 1999).Google Scholar
Catley, P. ‘The Need for a Partial Defence of Diminished Capacity and the Potential Role of the Cognitive Sciences in Helping Frame That Defence’ in Ligthart, S. et al. (eds.), Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice & Security (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021).Google Scholar
Chalmers, J. ‘Partial Defences to Murder in Scotland: An Unlikely Tranquillity’ in Reed, A & Bohlander, M, Loss of Control and Diminished Responsibility: Domestic, Comparative and International Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Chalmers, J. & Leverick, F., Criminal Defences and Pleas in Bar of Trial (Edinburgh: W. Green, 2006).Google Scholar
Chalmers, J. & Leverick, F., The Criminal Law of Scotland, Vol. 1, 4th edn (Edinburgh: W. Green, 2023).Google Scholar
Chappell, V. C. (ed.), Ordinary Language: Essays in Philosophical Method 43 (Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1964).Google Scholar
Charman, S., Douglass, A. B., & Mook, A., ‘Cognitive Bias in Legal Decision Making’ in Brewer, N. & Douglass, A. B. (eds.), Psychological Science and the Law (New York: The Guildford Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Chiao, V. Criminal Law in the Age of the Administrative State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).10.1093/oso/9780190273941.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiao, V. ‘Two Conceptions of the Criminal Law’ in Flanders, C. & Hoskins, Z. (eds.), The New Philosophy of Criminal Law (Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016).Google Scholar
Child, J. & Ormerod, D., Smith and Hogan’s Essentials of Criminal Law, 1st edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).10.1093/he/9780199689569.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, N. Limits to Pain: The Role of Punishment in Penal Policy (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1981).Google Scholar
Christman, J. Social and Political Philosophy: A Contemporary Introduction (London: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Christman, J. P. (ed.), The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Clear, T. R. Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods Worse (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Cohen, S. ‘Social Control and the Politics of Reconstruction’ in Nelken, D. (ed.), The Futures of Criminology (London: Sage Publications, 1994).Google Scholar
Cohen, S. Vision of Social Control (New York: Polity Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Coppola, F. The Emotional Brain and the Guilty Mind (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2021).Google Scholar
Costanzo, M. & Krauss, D., Forensic and Legal Psychology (Cheltenham: Worth Publishers, 2012).Google Scholar
Craigie, J. & Coram, A., ‘Irrationality, Mental Capacities, and Neuroscience’ in Vincent, N. (ed.), Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Crofts, T. & Loughnan, A. (eds.), Criminalisation and Criminal Responsibility in Australia (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Cuneen, C., Baldry, E., Brown, D., Brown, M., Schwartz, M., & Steel, A., Penal Culture and Hyperincarceration: The Revival of the Prison (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Dell, S. Murder Into Manslaughter (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Dershowitz, A. The Abuse Excuse: And Other Cop-Outs, Sob Stories, and Evasions of Responsibility (New York: Little, Brown & Co., 1995).Google Scholar
Dingwall, G. & Hillier, T., Blamestorming, Blamemongers and Scapegoats: Allocating Blame in the Criminal Justice Process (Bristol: Policy Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Doris, J. M. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).10.1017/CBO9781139878364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, D. & Hansen, K., ‘Welfare and Punishment in Comparative Perspective’ in Armstrong, S. & McAra, L. (eds.), Perspectives on Punishment: The Contours of Control (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Dressler, J. ‘Provocation, Explaining and Justifying the Defense in Partial Excuse, Loss of Self-Control Terms’ in Robinson, P., Ferzan, K., & Garvey, S. (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Duff, A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S., & Tadros, V. (eds.), The Trial on Trial Volume Three: Towards a Normative Theory of the Criminal Trial (Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar
Duff, A. & Marshall, S., ‘Civic Wrongs’ in Dzur, A. (ed.), Democratic Theory and Mass Incarceration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. Intention, Agency and Criminal Liability: Philosophy of Action and the Criminal Law (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. Punishment, Communication, and Community (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. ‘Relational Reasons and the Criminal Law’ in Green, L. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, Vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. ‘Retrieving Retributivism’ in White, M. D. (ed.), Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. The Realm of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).10.1093/oso/9780199570195.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A. ‘The Reciprocity of Criminal Responsibility’ in Crofts, T., Kennefick, L., & Loughnan, A. (eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Criminal Responsibility (London: Routledge, 2025).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. Trials and Punishments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. & Garland, D. (eds.), A Reader on Punishment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S., & Tadros, V. (eds.), The Trial on Trial: Volume 1 Truth and Due Process (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S. E., Renzo, M., & Tadros, V. (eds.), The Structures of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Easton, S. & Piper, C., Sentencing and Punishment, 5th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).10.1093/oso/9780192863294.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endicott, T. Vagueness in Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268406.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, L. Making the Modern Criminal Law: Criminalization and Civil Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199568642.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassin, D. The Will to Punish (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).10.1093/oso/9780190888589.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, J. ‘Causing Voluntary Action’ in Feinberg, J. (ed.), Doing & Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law Vol 3: Harm to Self (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Feldman, G. ‘Neoliberalism and Poverty: An Unbreakable Relationship’ in Greve, B. (ed.), Routledge International Handbook of Poverty (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
Fineman, M. A. ‘Introduction: Understanding Vulnerability’ in Fineman, M. A. & Spitz, L. (eds.), Law, Vulnerability, and the Responsive State: Beyond Equality and Liberty (London: Routledge, 2023).10.4324/9781003323242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, M. A. & Grear, A. (eds.), Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Fingarette, H. & Fingarette Hasse, A., Mental Disabilities and Criminal Responsibility (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Fischer, J. & Ravizza, M., Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998).10.1017/CBO9780511814594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitz-Gibbon, K. Homicide Law Reform, Gender and the Provocation Defense: A Comparative Perspective (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2014).Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. P. Rethinking Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).10.1093/oso/9780195136951.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortson, R. ‘The Modern Partial Defence of Diminished Responsibility’ in Reed, A. & Bohlander, M. (eds.), Loss of Control and Diminished Responsibility: Domestic, Comparative and International Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. ‘Governmentality’ in Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmental Rationality (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. ‘Technologies of the Self’ in Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (London: Tavistock, 1988).Google Scholar
Frase, R. S. Just Sentencing: Principles and Procedures for a Workable System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199757862.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frase, R. S. ‘Theories of Proportionality and Desert’ in Petersilla, J. & Reitz, K. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Fraser, N. ‘From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a “Post-Socialist” Age’ in Phillips, A. (ed.), Feminism and Politics: Oxford Readings in Feminism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023).Google Scholar
Fraser, N. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
Fraser, N. ‘Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World’ in Fraser, N. & Bourdieu, P. with Lovell, T. (eds.), Misrecognition, Social Inequality and Social Justice (New York: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar
Fraser, N. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Fraser, N. ‘Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation’ in Ray, L. & Sayer, A. (eds.), Culture and Economy After the Cultural Turn (London: SAGE Publications, 1999).Google Scholar
Fraser, N. & Honneth, A., Redistribution or Recognition? A Political Philosophyical Exchange (London: Verso, 2003).Google Scholar
Frie, R. ‘The Situated Nature of Psychological Agency’ in Frie, R. (ed.), Psychological Agency: Theory, Practice, and Culture (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008).10.7551/mitpress/7677.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulford, K. W. M. ‘Value, Action, Mental Illness, and the Law’ in Shute, S., Gardner, J., & Horder, J. (eds.), Action and Value in Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Garland, D. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).10.7208/chicago/9780226190174.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, S. ‘Injustice, Authority, and the Criminal Law’ in Sarat, A. (ed.), The Punitive Imagination: Law, Justice, and Responsibility (Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Gilovich, T., Keltner, D., Chen, S., & Nisbett, R., Social Psychology, 3rd edn (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2013).Google Scholar
Goodin, R. Protecting the Vulnerable: A Re-Analysis of Our Social Responsibilities (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Gordon, G. H. Criminal Law of Scotland (Edinburgh: W. Green, 1978).Google Scholar
Gordon, G. H. Criminal Law of Scotland, 3rd edn (Edinburgh: W. Green, 2000).Google Scholar
Gordon, G. H. Criminal Law of Scotland, 3rd edn (Supp. Service) (Edinburgh: W. Green, 2005).Google Scholar
Green, S. ‘Crime, Victimisation and Vulnerability’ in Walklate, S. (ed.), Handbook of Victims and Victimology (London: Willan, 2007).Google Scholar
Green, S. P. ‘Just Deserts in Unjust Societies: A Case Specific Approach’ in Duff, R. A. & Green, S. P. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Gross, H. & von Hirsch, A. (eds.), Sentencing (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Hanson, J. & Jost, J. (eds.), Ideology, Psychology, and Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. ‘Legal Responsibility and Excuses’ in Hook, S. (ed.), Determinism and Freedom in the Age of Modern Science, 2nd edn (New York: Collier Books, 1965).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. ‘Negligence, Mens Rea, and Criminal Responsibility’ in Hart, H. L. A. with Gardner, J. (eds.), Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008 [1961]).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534777.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. in Gardner, J. (ed.), Punishment and Responsibility, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008 [1968]).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534777.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. & Honoré, A. M., Causation in the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Heffernan, W. C. ‘Social Justice/Criminal Justice’ in Heffernan, W. C. & Kleinig, J. (eds.), From Social Justice to Criminal Justice: Poverty and the Administration of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).10.1093/oso/9780195129854.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit, Miller, A. V. (trans.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976) with analysis and foreword by Findlay, J. N..Google Scholar
Heider, F. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (New York: Wiley, 1958).10.1037/10628-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, V. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Helm, B. W. Communities of Respect: Grounding Responsibility, Authority, and Dignity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).10.1093/oso/9780198801863.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, J. Criminal Law: Text, Cases and Materials, 9th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).10.1093/he/9780198848479.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, J. Law and the Relational Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).10.1017/9781108348171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, J. ‘The Serious Wrong of Domestic Abuse and the Loss of Control Defence’ in Reed, A. & Bohlander, M. (eds.), Loss of Control and Diminished Responsibility: Domestic, Comparative and International Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
HillJr, T. E. Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).10.1093/0198238347.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life (New York: Columbia University Press, 2014).10.7312/honn16246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, Wright, C. W. (ed.) (Albany: SUNY Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Honneth, A. The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel’s Social Theory (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010).10.1515/9781400835027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Anderson, J. (trans.) (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995).10.2307/jj.18253805.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horder, J. Ashworth’s Principles of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).10.1093/he/9780198753070.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horder, J. Excusing Crime (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Horder, J. Provocation and Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198256960.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, Z. Beyond Punishment? A Normative Account of the Collateral Legal Consequences of Conviction, Studies in Penal Theory and Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019).10.1093/oso/9780199389230.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D. ‘Does Criminal Liability Require an Act?’ in Husak, D., The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585038.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D. Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328714.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D. ‘What Do Criminals Deserve?’ in Ferzan, K. K. & Morse, S. J. (eds.), Legal, Moral, and Metaphysical Truths: The Philosophy of Michael S. Moore (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Husak, D. & de Marneffe, P., The Legalization of Drugs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).10.1017/CBO9780511614842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ievins, A. Stains of Imprisonment: Moral Communication and Men Convicted of Sex Offenses (Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2023).10.1525/9780520383722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. World Crisis and Underdevelopment: A Critical Theory of Poverty, Agency, and Coercion, 1st edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).10.1017/9781108377874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, R. Social Identity, 3rd edn (Abingdon: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
Jones, E. E. & Davis, K. E., ‘From Acts to Dispositions: The Attribution Process in Person Perception’ in Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2 (New York: Academic Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Kadish, S. H. Blame and Punishment: Essays in the Criminal Law (New York: Macmillan USA, 1987).Google Scholar
Katz, L. D. ‘Relational Concepts of Retribution’ in Altman, M. C. (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook on the Philosophy of Punishment (London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2023).Google Scholar
Kelly, E. The Limits of Blame: Rethinking Punishment and Responsibility (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, E. ‘The Retributive Sentiments’ in Focquaert, F., Shaw, E., & Waller, B. N. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook on the Philosophy and Science of Punishment (New York: Routledge Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. Attribution in Social Interaction (Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Kemp, G. ‘South Africa’ in Reed, A. & Bohlander, M. (eds.), Homicide in Criminal Law: A Research Companion (Abingdon: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
Kennefick, L. ‘Criminal Responsibility Attribution as a Step on the Road to Desistance? Exploring Theoretical Intersections’ in Crofts, T., Kennefick, L., & Loughnan, A. (eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Criminal Responsibility (London: Routledge, 2025).Google Scholar
Kenny, A. Freewill and Responsibility (London: Routledge, 1978).Google Scholar
Kersting, W. Theorien der sozialen Gerechtigkeit [Theories of Social Justice] (Stuttgart/Weimar: Springer, 2000).10.1007/978-3-476-01668-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, E. F. Loveʼs Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency (New York: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Kittay, E. F. ‘The Relationality and the Normativity of An Ethic of Care’ in Ivanhoe, P., Flanagan, O., Harrison, V., Sarkissian, H., & Schwitzgebel, E. (eds.), The Oneness Hypothesis: Beyond the Boundary of Self (New York: Columbia University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Knight, C. & Stemplowska, Z. (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565801.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knijn, T. & Lepianka, D., Justice and Vulnerability in Europe: An Interdisciplinary Approach (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020).10.4337/9781839108488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, C. The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552733.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurek, L. ‘Law, Folk Psychology and Cognitive Science’ in Brożek, B., Hage, J., & Vincent, N. (eds.), Law and Mind: A Survey of Law and the Cognitive Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Kurki, V. A. J. A Theory of Legal Personhood (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).10.1093/oso/9780198844037.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. In Search of Criminal Responsibility: Ideas, Interests, and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248209.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. State Punishment (Abingdon: Routledge, 1988).Google Scholar
Lacey, N. ‘The Resurgence of Character: Criminal Responsibility in the Context of Criminalisation’ in Duff, R. A. & Green, S. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Lee, C. ‘Reasonable Provocation and Self-Defence: Recognizing the Distinction between Act Reasonableness and Emotion Reasonableness’ in Robinson, P., Ferzan, K., & Garvey, S. (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. D. Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Lippke, R. ‘Parsimony and the Sentencing of Multiple Offenders’ in de Keijser, J., Roberts, J. V., & Ryberg, J. (eds.), Sentencing for Multiple Crimes, Studies in Penal Theory and Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Locke, J. ‘Of the State of Nature’ in Second Treatise of Civil Government (1690), reprinted in Locke, J. & Shapiro, I., Two Treatises of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Loughnan, A. ‘From Carpetbag to Crucible: Reconceptualising Diminished Responsibility Manslaughter’ in Livings, B., Reed, A., & Wake, N. (eds.), Mental Condition Defences and the Criminal Justice System: Perspectives from Law and Medicine (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar
Loughnan, A. Manifest Madness: Mental Incapacity in Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Loughnan, A. ‘Re-Situating Criminal Responsibility: Introducing Interstitial Spaces’ in Solanke, I. (ed.), On Crime, Society and Responsibility in the Work of Nicola Lacey (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Loughnan, A. Self, Others and the State: Relations of Criminal Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).10.1017/9781108596367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, R. ‘The Insanity Defence in English Law’ in Mackay, R. & Brookbanks, W. (eds.), The Insanity Defence: International and Comparative Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023).Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. ‘Relational Autonomy’ in Hall, K. Q. & Ásta, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. ‘The Importance of Relational Autonomy and Capabilities for an Ethics of Vulnerability’ in Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316649.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199316649.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. E. & Duff, R. A., ‘Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs’ in Robinson, P. H. (ed.), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. ‘Citizenship and Social Class’ in Shafir, G. (ed.), The Citizenship Debates: A Reader (Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. & Bottomore, T., Citizenship and Social Class (London: Pluto Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Matravers, M. ‘Is Twenty-First Century Punishment Post-Desert?’ in Tonry, M. (ed.), Retributivism Has a Past: Has It a Future? (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Matravers, M. ‘Mad, Bad, or Faulty? Desert in Distributive and Retributive Justice’ in Knight, C. & Stemplowska, Z. (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Matravers, M. ‘The Criminal Law’s Various Persons’ in Lernestedt, C. & Matravers, M. (eds.), The Criminal Law’s Person (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2022).10.5040/9781509923779.ch-002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuley, F. Insanity, Psychiatry and Criminal Responsibility (Dublin: Round Hall Press, 1993).Google Scholar
McDiarmid, C. ‘Don’t Look Back in Anger: The Partial Defence of Provocation in Scots Criminal Law’ in Chalmers, J., Leverick, F., & Farmer, L. (eds.), Essays in Criminal Law in Honour of Sir Gerald Gordon (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
McEwan, J. The Verdict of the Court: Passing Judgment in Law and Psychology (Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2003),Google Scholar
McGeer, V. ‘Civilizing Blame’ in Coates, D. J. & Tognazzini, N. A. (eds.), Blame: Its Nature and Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
McKenna, M. ‘Directed Blame and Conversation’ in Coates, D. & Tognazzini, N. (eds.), Blame: Its Nature and Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
McNay, L. ‘Historicizing Recognition: From Ontology to Teleology’ in Ikäheimo, H., Leopold, K., & Stahl, T. (eds.), Recognition and Ambivalence (New York: Columbia University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
McNeill, F. Pervasive Punishment (Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2018).10.1108/9781787564657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, F. ‘Resisting Mass Supervision’ in Carlen, P. & França, L. A. (eds.), Justice Alternatives (London: Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
Meyers, D. (ed.), Feminists Rethink the Self (New York: Westview Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Milanović, B. Capitalism Alone (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Miller, D. Principles of Social Justice (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Miller, P. & Rose, N., Governing the Present: Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life (New York: Polity Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Millie, A. Securing Respect: Behavioural Expectations and Anti-Social Behaviour in the UK (Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. ‘Loss of Control Under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009: Oh No!’ in Reed, A. & Bohlander, M. (eds.), Loss of Control and Diminished Responsibility: Domestic, Comparative and International Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Mocan, N. ‘Biases in Judicial Decision-Making’ in Avery, J. & Sidanius, J. (eds.), Bias in the Law: A Definitive Look at Racial Prejudice in the U.S. Criminal Justice System (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2021).Google Scholar
Moore, M. S. Law and Psychiatry: Rethinking the Relationship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Moore, M. S. Placing Blame: A General Theory of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Morris, N. Madness and the Criminal Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Morris, N. ‘Punishment, Desert and Rehabilitation’ in Gross, H. & von Hirsch, A. (eds.), Sentencing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Morris, N. The Future of Imprisonment (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Morse, S. ‘Psychology, Determinism and Legal Responsibility’ in Melton, G. B. (ed.), The Law as a Behavioural Instrument (Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. ‘Against Control Tests for Criminal Responsibility’ in Robinson, P. H., Garvey, S., & Kessler Ferzan, K. (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. ‘Deprivation and Desert’ in Heffernan, W. C. & Kleinig, J. (eds.), From Social Justice to Criminal Justice: Poverty and the Administration of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. For a Left Populism (London: Verso Books, 2020).Google Scholar
Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E., Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much (London: Allen Lane, 2013).Google Scholar
Murray, C. A. Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980 (New York: Basic Books, 1984).Google Scholar
Naffine, N. Criminal Law and the Man Problem (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019).10.5040/9781509918041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naffine, N. Law’s Meaning of Life: Philosophy, Religion, Darwin and the Legal Person (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Neal, M. ‘The Idea of Vulnerability in Healthcare Law and Ethics: From the Margins to the Mainstream?’ in Bedford, D. & Herring, J. (eds.), Embracing Vulnerability: The Challenges and Implications for Law (London: Routledge, 2020).Google Scholar
Norrie, A. Crime, Reason and History: A Critical Introduction to Criminal Law, 2nd edn (London: Butterworths, 2001).Google Scholar
Norrie, A. Justice and the Slaughter Bench: Essays on Law’s Broken Dialectic (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Norrie, A. ‘Practical Reasoning and Criminal Responsibility: A Jurisprudential Approach’ in Cornish, D. B. & Clarke, R. V. (eds.), The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending (New York: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
Norrie, A. Punishment, Responsibility and Justice: A Relational Critique (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198259565.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. Creating Capabilities (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011).10.4159/harvard.9780674061200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormerod, D. Smith and Hogan Criminal Law, 12th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Ormerod, D. & Laird, K., Smith, Hogan and Ormerod’s Text, Cases, and Materials on Criminal Law, 12th edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).10.1093/he/9780198788713.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortner, S. B. ‘Patterns of History: Cultural Schemas in the Founding of Sherpa Religious Institutions’ in Ohnuki-Tierney, E. (ed.), Culture through Time: Anthropological Approaches (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Pada, R. T. Axel Honneth’s Social Philosophy of Recognition: Freedom, Normativity, and Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017).Google Scholar
Paradis, C., Bowen, M., & McCullough, G., ‘Intimate Partner Violence: Psychological Effects and Legal Defenses’ in Javier, R., Owen, E., & Maddux, J. (eds.), Assessing Trauma in Forensic Contexts (Cham: Springer, 2020).Google Scholar
Parekh, B. ‘Cultural Defense and the Criminal Law’ in Kymlicka, W. (ed.), Criminal Law and Cultural Diversity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Pawlik, M. Normbestätigung und Identitätsbalance: Über die Legitimation staatlichen Strafens [Norm Confirmation and Identity Balance: On the Legitimacy of Punishing] (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017).10.5771/9783845287638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedace, C. F. ‘Victim/Victimology/Vulnerability’ in Simone, A., Boiano, I., & Condello, A. (eds.), Legal Feminism (London: Routledge, 2022).Google Scholar
Peng Kok, L., Cheang, M., & Tsee Chee, K., Diminished Responsibility: With Special Reference to Singapore (Singapore: Singapore University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Perlin, M. L. ‘The Insanity Defense: Nine Myths That Will Not Go Away’ in White, M. D. (ed.), The Insanity Defense: Multidisciplinary Views on Its History, Trends, and Controversies (Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2017).Google Scholar
Pickard, H. ‘Responsibility Without Blame: Philosophical Reflections on Clinical Practice’ in Fulford, K. W. M., Davies, M., Gipps, R., Graham, G., Sadler, J. Z., Stanghellini, G., & Thornton, T. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Pogge, T. ‘Concluding Reflections’ in Brock, G. (ed.), Cosmopolitanism Versus Non-Cosmopolitanism: Critiques, Defenses, Reconceptualizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Ramsay, P. The Insecurity State: Vulnerable Autonomy and the Right to Security in the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581061.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).10.4159/9780674042605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice, revised edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).10.4159/9780674042582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Reed, A. & Bohlander, M., Loss of Control and Diminished Responsibility: Domestic, Comparative and International Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Reeves, C. ‘Responsibility Beyond Blame: Unfree Agency and the Moral Psychology of Criminal Law’s Person’ in Lernestedt, C. & Matravers, M. (eds.), The Criminal Law’s Person (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2022).Google Scholar
Reiff, M. R. & Cruft, R., ‘Antony Duff and the Philosophy of Punishment’ in Cruft, R. (ed.), Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Renteln, A. D. The Cultural Defense (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).10.1093/oso/9780195154023.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ristroph, A. ‘Responsibility for the Criminal Law’ in Duff, R. A. & Green, S. P. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H. ‘Abnormal Mental State Mitigations or Murder – The U.S. Perspective’ in Reed, A. & Bohlander, M. (eds.), Loss of Control and Diminished Responsibility: Domestic, Comparative and International Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H. Distributive Principles of Criminal Law: Who Should Be Punished and How Much (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195365757.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. H. ‘The Modern General Part: Three Illusions’ in Shute, S. & Simester, A. P. (eds.), Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Rose, N. ‘Governing the Enterprising Self’ in Heelas, P. & Moris, P. (eds.), The Values of the Enterprise Culture: The Moral Debate (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Rose, N. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Rosen, M. ‘Dignity: The Case Against’ in McCrudden, C. (ed.), Understanding Human Dignity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Ross, L. & Shestowsky, D. ‘Two Social Psychologists’ Reflections on Situationism and the Criminal Justice System’ in Hanson, J. & Jost, J. (eds.), Ideology, Psychology, and Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Scheff, T. Being Mentally Ill: A Sociological Theory (Chicago: Aldine, 1966).Google Scholar
Schmidt am Busch, H.-C. ‘Can the Goals of the Frankfurt School be Achieved by a Theory of Recognition?’ in Schmidt am Busch, H.-C. & Zurn, C. F. (eds.), The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2010).Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. The Concept of the Political, Schwab, G. (trans.) (New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Schram, S. F. The Return of Ordinary Capitalism: Neoliberalism, Precarity, Occupy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190253011.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreck, C. J. & Berg, M. T., ‘What Ideas of Victimization and Vulnerability Mean for Criminological Theory’ in Pratt, T. C. & Turanovic, J. J. (eds.), Revitalizing Victimization Theory (London: Routledge, 2021).Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E. ‘A Dispositional Approach to Attitudes: Thinking Outside the Belief Box’ in Nottleman, M. (ed.), New Essays on Belief: Constitution, Content and Structure (New York: Springer, 2013).Google Scholar
Sen, A. The Idea of Justice (London: Penguin Books, 2010).Google Scholar
Shaver, K. G. An Introduction to Attribution Processes (London: Routledge, 2016).10.4324/9781315536019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simester, A. P., Spencer, J. R., Sullivan, G. R., & Virgo, G. J., Simester and Sullivan’s Criminal Law: Theory and Doctrine, 4th edn (Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar
Simon, J. Mass Incarceration on Trial: A Remarkable Court Decision and the Future of Prisons in America (New York: The New Press, 2014).10.2307/jj.26193180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöström, S. ‘Labelling Theory’ in Cohen, B. M. Z. (ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Mental Health (New York: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Slovenko, R. ‘Foreward’ in Scrignar, D. B., Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 1984).Google Scholar
Smith, J. C. & Hogan, B., Criminal Law (London: Butterworths, 1992).Google Scholar
Sola, J. C. ‘Crime and Punishment of the Poor from Recognition Theory Perspective’ in Schweiger, G. (ed.), Poverty, Inequality and the Critical Theory of Recognition (Cham: Springer, 2020).Google Scholar
Song, S. ‘The “Cultural Defense” in American Law’ in Justice, Gender, and the Politics of Multiculturalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Spain, E. The Role of Emotions in Criminal Defences: Necessity and Duress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).10.1017/CBO9781139030625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, G. The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007 [1958]).10.1515/9781400828272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadros, V. Criminal Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Tanguay-Renaud, F. States as Wrongdoers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming, September 2025).Google Scholar
Taylor, C. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Thorburn, M. ‘Constitutionalism and the Limits of the Criminal Law’ in Duff, R. A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S. E., Renzo, M., & Tadros, V. (eds.), The Structures of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Thorburn, M. ‘Criminal Law as Public Law’ in Duff, R. A. & Green, S. P. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Tonry, M. Doing Justice, Preventing Crime (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020).10.1093/oso/9780195320503.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, M. ‘Fairness, Equality, Proportionality and Parsimony: Towards a Comprehensive Jurisprudence of Just Punishment’ in du Bois-Pedain, E. A. & Bottoms, A. E. (eds.), Penal Censure: Engagements Within and Beyond Desert Theory (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2019).Google Scholar
Tonry, M. ‘Preface’ in Tonry, M. (ed.), Of One-Eyed and Toothless Miscreants: Making the Punishment Fit the Crime? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Tonry, M. (ed.), Retributivism Has a Past: Has It a Future? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199798278.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, J. & Western, B. (eds.), Parsimony and Other Radical Ideas About Justice (New York: The New Press, 2023).10.2307/jj.26193106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, G. ‘Respect and the Efficacy of Blame’ in Shoemaker, D. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, Vol. IV (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Unnever, J. D. & Cullen, F. T., ‘Public Opinion and the Death Penalty’ in Oswald, M. E., Bieneck, S., & Hupfeld-Heinemann, J. (eds.), Social Psychology of Punishment of Crime (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2009).Google Scholar
von Hirsch, A. Censure and Sanctions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262411.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hirsch, A. & Ashworth, A., Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272600.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hirsch, A., Ashworth, A., & Roberts, J. V. (eds.), Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy, 3rd edn (London: Bloomsbury, 2009).Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Walker, N. Crime and Insanity in England, Volume One: The Historical Perspective (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Warmke, B. ‘Responsibility and Situationism’ in Nelkin, D. K. & Pereboom, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).Google Scholar
Watson, G. Respect and Criminal Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).10.1093/oso/9780198833345.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werth, R. ‘Breaking the Rules the Right Way: Resisting Parole Logics and Asserting Autonomy in the USA’ in Armstrong, R. & Durnescu, I. (eds.), Parole and Beyond: International Experiences of Life after Parole (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Google Scholar
Whelan, D. Mental Health Law and Practice: Civil and Criminal Aspects (Dublin: Round Hall, 2009).Google Scholar
Wiegman, I. ‘Doubts About Retribution: Is Punishment Non-Instrumentally Good or Right?’ in Altman, M. C. (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook on the Philosophy of Punishment (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2023).Google Scholar
Williams, G. Criminal Law: The General Part (London: Stevens, 1961).Google Scholar
Williams, G. Textbook of Criminal Law (London: Stevens & Sons, 1978).Google Scholar
Williams, G. Textbook of Criminal Law, 2nd edn (London: Stevens & Sons, 1983).Google Scholar
Williams, R. R. Hegel’s Ethics of Recognition (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. Moral Judgment: Does the Abuse Excuse Threaten Our Legal System? (New York: BasicBooks, 1997).Google Scholar
Wilson, W. Central Issues in Criminal Theory (Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2002).Google Scholar
Wolf, S. ‘Attributability and the Self’ in Coates, D. J. & Tognazzini, N. A. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, Vol. 5 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Wolff, J. Ethics and Public Policy: A Philosophical Inquiry (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Young, I. M. Responsibility for Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Zehr, H. Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice (Harrisonburg, VA: Herald Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. ‘A Situationist Perspective on the Psychology of Evil: Understanding How Good People Are Transformed Into Perpetrators’ in Miller, A. (ed.), The Social Psychology of Good and Evil: Understanding our Capacity for Kindness and Cruelty (New York: Guildford, 2004).Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. Living With Uncertainty: The Moral Significance of Ignorance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).10.1017/CBO9780511481505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aboraya, A., Rankin, E., France, C., El-Missiry, A., & John, C., ‘The Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis Revisited: The Clinician’s Guide to Improve the Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis’, Psychiatry 3(1): (2006), pp. 41–50.Google Scholar
Acosta, E., De Bustillo, M., Martín, E., Aragón, N., & Betancort, M., ‘Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Minimum Intervention Measures on Young Offenders’, The Spanish Journal of Psychology 15(2): (2012), pp. 702–709.10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, C. ‘Oregon’s Psychiatric Security Review Board – Trouble in Paradise’, Law and Psychology Review 22(Spring): (1998), pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
Allsopp, K., Read, J., Corcoran, R., & Kinderman, P., ‘Heterogeneity in Psychiatric Diagnostic Classification’, Psychiatry Research 279(Sept.): (2019), pp. 15–22.10.1016/j.psychres.2019.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. ‘What Is the Point of Equality?’, Ethics, 109(2): (1999), pp. 287–337.10.1086/233897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E. S. & Pildes, R. H., ‘Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148(5): (2000), pp. 1503–1575.10.2307/3312748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antill, G. ‘Fitting the Model Penal Code Into a Reason-Responsiveness Picture of Culpability’, Yale Law Journal 131: (2022), pp. 1346–1384.Google Scholar
Arenella, P. ‘The Diminished Capacity and Diminished Responsibility Defenses: Two Children of a Doomed Marriage’, Columbia Law Review 77(6): (1977), pp. 827–865.10.2307/1121980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. & Krisberg, B., ‘Wider, Stronger, and Different Nets: The Dialectics of Criminal Justice Reform’, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 18(1): (1981), pp. 165–196.10.1177/002242788101800110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. ‘A Plea for Excuses’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57: (1956–1957), pp. 1–30.10.1093/aristotelian/57.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagaric, M., Wolf, G., & Isham, P., ‘Trauma and Sentencing: The Case for Mitigating Penalty for Childhood Physical and Sexual Abuse’, Stanford Law and Policy Review 30(1): (2018), pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. ‘Favoured or Oppressed? Married Women, Property and “Coverture” in England, 1660–1800’, Continuity and Change 17(3): (2002), pp. 351–372.10.1017/S0268416002004253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L., ‘Automaticity of Social Behavior: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Activation on Action’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(2): (1996), pp. 230–244.10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, J. A. & Chartrand, T. L., ‘The Unbearable Automaticity of Being’, American Psychologist 54(7): (1999), pp. 462–479.10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, C., Clarke, N., Cloke, P., & Malpass, A., ‘The Elusive Subjects of Neo-Liberalism: Beyond the Analytics of Governmentality’, Cultural Studies 22(5): (2008), pp. 624–653.10.1080/09502380802245902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, P. ‘The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Mental Health Law’, Modern Law Review 75(5): (2012), pp. 752–778.10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00923.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzun, C. L. ‘Inside-Out: Beyond the Internal/External Distinction in Legal Scholarship’, Virginia Law Review 101(5): (2015), pp. 1203–1288.Google Scholar
Bateson, K., McManus, M., & Johnson, G., ‘Understanding the Use, and Misuse, of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) in Trauma-Informed Policing’, The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles 93(3): (2019), pp. 131–145.10.1177/0032258X19841409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z. ‘The Great War of Recognition’, Theory, Culture and Society 18(2–3): (2001), pp. 137–150.10.1177/02632760122051823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazelon, D. L. ‘The Morality of the Criminal Law’, Southern California Law Review 49: (1975–1976), pp. 385–405.Google Scholar
Becker, G. ‘Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach’, Journal of Political Economy 76(2): (1968), pp. 169–217.10.1086/259394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benforado, A. ‘Frames of Injustice: The Bias We Overlook’, Indiana Law Journal 85(4): (2010), pp. 1333–1378.Google Scholar
Benforado, A. & Hanson, J. D., ‘The Great Attributional Divide: How Divergent Views of Human Behavior Are Shaping Legal Policy’, Emory Law Journal 57(2): (2008), pp. 311–408.Google Scholar
Benson, M. L., Alarid, L. F, Burton, V. S., & Cullen, F. T., ‘Reintegration or Stigmatization? Offenders’ Expectations of Community Re-Entry’, Journal of Criminal Justice 39(5): (2011), pp. 385–393.10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, D. J. ‘Rawls’ Theory of Justice’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121(5): (1973), pp. 1073–1078.10.2307/3311281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergelson, V. ‘Rationales: Rejected, Imagined and Real – Provocation, Loss of Control and Extreme Mental or Emotional Disturbance’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 72(2): (2021), pp. 363–388.10.53386/nilq.v72i2.884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, A. S. ‘Arrogance Among Physicians’, Academic Medicine 77(2): (2002), pp. 145–147.10.1097/00001888-200202000-00010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, M. N. ‘Proportionality, Constraint, and Culpability’, Criminal Law and Philosophy 15(3): (2021), pp. 373–391.10.1007/s11572-021-09589-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, M. N. ‘Punishment and Justification’, Ethics 118(2): (2008), pp. 258–290.10.1086/527424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Z. & Frederickson, J., ‘Explanations and Implications of the Fundamental Attribution Error: A Review and Proposal’, Journal of Integrated Social Sciences 5(1): (2015), pp. 44–57.Google Scholar
Besser-Jones, L. ‘Social Psychology, Moral Character, and Moral Fallibility’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76(2): (2008), pp. 310–332.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00134.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, G., McGinley, H., & Pasewark, R., ‘Understanding the Use of the Insanity Defense’, Journal of Clinical Psychology 49(3): (1993), pp. 435–440.10.1002/1097-4679(199305)49:3<435::AID-JCLP2270490319>3.0.CO;2-P3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, S. ‘The Prerequisite of Personal Guilt and the Duty to Know the Law in the Light of Article 32 ICC Statute’, Utrecht Law Review 9(4): (2013), pp. 184–194.10.18352/ulr.249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondi, L. ‘Working the Spaces of Neoliberal Subjectivity: Psychotherapeutic Technologies, Professionalization and Counselling’, Antipode 37(3): (2005), pp. 497–514.10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00508.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, M. (ed.), ‘Special Issue – Reinventing Penal Parsimony’, Theoretical Criminology 14(3): (2010).10.1177/1362480610373219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, M., Hasselberg, I., & Turnbull, S., ‘Punishment, Citizenship and Identity: An Introduction’, Criminology and Criminal Justice 16(3): (2016), pp. 257–266.10.1177/1748895816635720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, M. & Briody, A., ‘Strategic Use of Temporary Employment Contracts as Real Options’, Journal of General Management 42(2): (2016), pp. 31–56.10.1177/030630701704200204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, S. ‘Not Proven: Introducing a Third Verdict’, The University of Chicago Law Review 72(4): (2005), pp. 1299–1329.Google Scholar
Bredström, A. ‘Culture and Context in Mental Health Diagnosing: Scrutinizing the DSM-5 Revision’, The Journal of Medical Humanities 40(3): (2019), pp. 347–363.10.1007/s10912-017-9501-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brettschneider, C. ‘The Rights of the Guilty: Punishment and Political Legitimacy’, Political Theory 35(2): (2007), pp. 175–199.10.1177/0090591706297714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, D. O. ‘Retributivism and Legal Moralism’, Ratio Juris 25(4): (2012), pp. 496–512.10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00524.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, D. O. ‘Situationism, Responsibility, and Fair Opportunity’, Social Philosophy & Policy 30(1–2): (2013), pp. 121–149.10.1017/S026505251300006XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, B. ‘Responsibilization and Recovery: Shifting Responsibilities on the Journey Through Mental Health Care to Social Engagement’, Social Theory & Health 19(1): (2021), pp. 92–109.10.1057/s41285-019-00097-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. ‘Criminalisation and Normative Theory’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice 25(2): (2013), pp. 605–625.10.1080/10345329.2013.12035986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. K. ‘Criminal Law Theory and Criminal Justice Practice’, American Criminal Law Review 49(1): (2012), pp. 73–103.Google Scholar
Brown, K. ‘The Governance of Vulnerability: Regulation, Support and Social Divisions in Action’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 37(11/12): (2017), pp. 667–682.10.1108/IJSSP-04-2016-0049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. ‘“Vulnerability”: Handle with Care’, Ethics and Social Welfare, 5(3): (2011), pp. 313–321.10.1080/17496535.2011.597165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K., Ecclestone, K., & Emmel, N., ‘The Many Faces of Vulnerability’, Social Policy and Society 16(3): (2017), pp. 497–510.10.1017/S1474746416000610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. C. H., Maslen, H., & Savulescu, J., ‘Against Moral Responsibilisation of Health: Prudential Responsibility and Health Promotion’, Public Health Ethics 12(2): (2019), pp. 114–129.10.1093/phe/phz006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunning, L. & Milam, P.-E., ‘Letting Go of Blame’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 106(3): (2022), pp. 720–740.10.1111/phpr.12899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchhandler-Raphael, M. ‘Loss of Self-Control, Dual-Process Theories, and Provocation’, Fordham Law Review 88(5): (2020), pp. 1815–1873.Google Scholar
Buron, A. L., Cullen, F. T., Burton, V. S., Graham, A., Butler, L. C., & Thielo, A. J., ‘Belief in Redeemability and Punitive Public Opinion: “Once a Criminal, Always a Criminal” Revisited’, Criminal Justice and Behavior 47(6): (2020), pp. 712–732.10.1177/0093854820913585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, P. ‘Much Respect: Toward a Hip-Hop Theory of Punishment’, Stanford Law Review 56(5): (2004), pp. 983–1003.Google Scholar
Bystrzycki, A. ‘A Call for Diminished Responsibility in Canada’, Manitoba Law Journal 45(5): (2022), pp. 255–281.Google Scholar
Cahill, M. T. ‘Retributive Justice in the Real World’, Washington University Law Review 85(4): (2007), pp. 815–870.Google Scholar
Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H., ‘Why Do We Punish? Deterrence and Just Deserts as Motives for Punishment’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(2): (2002), pp. 284–299.10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, H. & Chamberlen, A., ‘Why Punishment Pleases: Punitive Feelings in a World of Hostile Solidarity’, Punishment and Society 20(2): (2018), pp. 217–234.10.1177/1462474517699814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, H., Chamberlen, A., & Lewis, R., ‘Punitiveness Beyond Criminal Justice: Punishable and Punitive Subjects in an Era of Prevention, Anti-Migration and Austerity’, British Journal of Criminology 60(2): (2019), pp. 265–284.Google Scholar
Chalmers, J. ‘Merging Provocation and Diminished Responsibility: Some Reasons for Scepticism’, Criminal Law Review 3: (2004), pp. 198–212.Google Scholar
Chalmers, J., Leverick, F., & Munro, V. E., ‘A Modern History of the Not Proven Verdict’, Edinburgh Law Review 25(2): (2021), pp. 151–172.10.3366/elr.2021.0692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, J., Leverick, F., & Munro, V. E., ‘Beyond Doubt: The Case Against ‘Not Proven’, The Modern Law Review 85(4): (2022), pp. 847–878.10.1111/1468-2230.12707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlen, A. & Carvalho, H., ‘Feeling the Absence of Justice: Notes on Our Pathological Reliance on Punitive Justice’, The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 61(1): (2021), pp. 87–102.10.1111/hojo.12458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlen, A. & Carvalho, H., ‘The Thrill of the Chase: Punishment, Hostility and the Prison Crisis’, Social & Legal Studies 28(1): (2019), pp. 100–117.10.1177/0964663918759820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiao, V. ‘What Is the Criminal Law For?’, Law and Philosophy 35(2): (2016), pp. 137–163.10.1007/s10982-015-9247-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J. J. ‘Defence of a Basic Voluntary Act Requirement in Criminal Law from Philosophies of Action’, New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 23(4): (2020), pp. 437–470.10.1525/nclr.2020.23.4.437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, G. J. ‘Unjustified: The Partial Irrelevance of the Justification / Excuse Distinction’, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 43(5): (2009), pp. 79–115.10.36646/mjlr.43.1.unjustifiedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirincione, C., Steadman, H. J., & McGreevy, M. A., ‘Rates of Insanity Acquittals and the Factors Associated with Successful Insanity Pleas’, Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 23(3): (1995): pp. 399–409.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. ‘Toward a Credible Agent-Causal Account of Free Will’, Noûs 27(2): (1993), pp. 191–203.10.2307/2215755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coca-Vila, I. & Irarrázaval, C., ‘A Criminal Law for Semicitizens’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 39(1): (2022), pp. 56–72.10.1111/japp.12534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commons, M. & Miller, P., ‘Folk Psychology and the Law: Why Behavioral Science Needs to Replace Folk Psychology’, The Journal of Psychiatry and Law 39(3): (2011), pp. 494–516.10.1177/009318531103900309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornford, A. ‘Mitigating Murder’, Criminal Law and Philosophy 10(1): (2016), pp. 31–44.10.1007/s11572-014-9298-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornford, A. ‘Rethinking the Wrongness Constraint on Criminalisation’, Law and Philosophy 36(6): (2017), pp. 615–649 at pp. 618–621.10.1007/s10982-017-9299-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornford, A. ‘The Aims and Functions of Criminal Law’, Modern Law Review 87(2): (2024), pp. 398–429.10.1111/1468-2230.12846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrado, M. ‘Addiction and Causation’, San Diego Law Review 37(4): (2000), pp. 913–958.Google Scholar
Corrado, M. ‘Automatism and the Theory of Action’, Emory Law Journal 39(4): (1990), pp. 1191–1228.Google Scholar
Cradock, G. ‘The Responsibility Dance: Creating Neoliberal Children’, Childhood 14(2): (2007), pp. 153–172.10.1177/0907568207078325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranor, C. ‘Towards a Theory of Respect for Persons’, American Philosophical Quarterly 12(4): (1975), pp. 303–319.Google Scholar
Crewe, B. & Ievins, A., ‘“Tightness”, Recognition and Penal Power’, Punishment & Society 23(1): (2021), pp. 47–68.10.1177/1462474520928115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crichton, J. H. M., Darjee, R., & Chiswick, D., ‘Diminished Responsibility in Scotland: New Case Law’, Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 15(3): (2004), pp. 552–565.10.1080/14789940410001714866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, P. L. ‘Concepts of Culpability and Deathworthiness: Differentiating Between Guilt and Punishment in Death Penalty Cases’, Fordham Law Review 66(1): (1997), pp. 21–86.Google Scholar
Crofts, T. ‘Labelling Homicides’, Annual Review of Law and Ethics 17: (2009), pp. 255–383.Google Scholar
Crofts, T. & Loughnan, A., ‘Provocation, NSW Style: Reform of the Defence of Provocation in NSW’, Criminal Law Review (2): (2014), pp. 107–123.Google Scholar
Crofts, T. & Wake, N., ‘Diminished Responsibility Determinations in England and Wales and New South Wales: Whose Role Is It Anyway?’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 72(2): (2021), pp. 324–362.10.53386/nilq.v72i2.874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, N. & Roberts, J. V., ‘Retributivism, Penal Censure, and Life Imprisonment Without Parole’, Criminal Justice Ethics 39(1): (2019), pp. 1–18.10.1080/0731129X.2019.1600289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darley, J. M., Carlsmith, K. M., & Robinson, P. H., ‘Incapacitation and Just Deserts as Motives for Punishment’, Law & Human Behavior 24(6): (2000), pp. 659–683.10.1023/A:1005552203727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, S. L. ‘Two Kinds of Respect’, Ethics 88(1): pp. 36–49.10.1086/292054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, E., Critchley, A., & Wright, L. H. V., ‘Making Scotland an ACE-Informed Nation’, Scottish Affairs 29(4): (2020), pp. 451–455.10.3366/scot.2020.0336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. R. & Aldieri, E., ‘Precarity and Resistance: A Critique of Martha Fineman’s Vulnerability Theory’, Hypatia 36(2): (2021), pp. 321–337.10.1017/hyp.2021.25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. ‘Punishment Theory’s Golden Half Century: A Survey of Developments from (About) 1957 to 2007’, Journal of Ethics 13(1): (2009), pp. 73–100.10.1007/s10892-008-9040-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Courson, B. & Nettle, D., ‘Why Do Inequality and Deprivation Produce High Crime and Low Trust?’, Scientific Reports 11(1): (2021), p. 1937.10.1038/s41598-020-80897-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vel-Palumbo, M., Howarth, L., & Brewer, M. B., ‘Once a Sex Offender Always a Sex Offender’? Essentialism and Attitudes Towards Criminal Justice Policy’, Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(5): (2019), pp. 421–439.10.1080/1068316X.2018.1529234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, M. ‘Governing the Unemployed Self in an Active Society’, Economy and Society 24(4): (1995), pp. 559–583.10.1080/03085149500000025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, R. ‘“Rotten Social Background”: Should the Criminal Law Recognize a Defense of Severe Environmental Deprivation?’, Law and Inequality 3(9): (1985), pp. 9–90.Google Scholar
Dell, S. ‘The Mandatory Sentence and Section 2’, Journal of Medical Ethics 12(1): (1986), pp. 28–31.10.1136/jme.12.1.28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denno, D. W. ‘How Courts in Criminal Cases Respond to Childhood Trauma’, Marquette Law Review 103(2): (2019), pp. 301–363.Google Scholar
Douglas, H. & Reed, A., ‘The Role of Loss of Self-Control in Defences to Homicide: A Critical Analysis of Anglo-Australian Developments’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 72(2): (2021), pp. 271–323.10.53386/nilq.v72i2.878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas-Scott, S. ‘Human Rights as a Basis for Justice in the European Union’, Transnational Legal Theory 8(1): (2017), pp. 59–78.10.1080/20414005.2017.1321907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, J. ‘Exegesis of the Law of Duress: Justifying the Excuse and Searching for Its Proper Limits’, Southern California Law Review 62(5): (1989), pp. 1331–1386.Google Scholar
Dressler, J. ‘Provocation: Partial Justification or Partial Excuse’, Modern Law Review 51(4): (1988), pp. 467–480.10.1111/j.1468-2230.1988.tb01767.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, J. ‘Reflections on Excusing Wrongdoers: Moral Theory, New Excuses and the Model Penal Code’, Rutgers Law Journal 19(3): (1988), pp. 671–715.Google Scholar
Dressler, J. ‘Rethinking Heat of Passion: A Defense in Search of a Rationale’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 73(2): (1982), pp. 421–470.10.2307/1143104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, J. ‘Some Very Modest Reflections on Excusing Criminal Wrongdoers’, Texas Tech Law Review 42(2): (2009), pp. 247–258.Google Scholar
Dressler, J. ‘Why Keep the Provocation Defense: Some Reflections on a Difficult Subject’, Minnesota Law Review 86: (2002), pp. 959–1002.Google Scholar
Dripps, D. A. ‘Fundamental Retribution Error: Criminal Justice and the Social Psychology of Blame’, Vanderbilt Law Review 56(5): (2003), pp. 1383–1438.Google Scholar
Dubber, M. D. ‘The Victim in American Penal Law: A Systematic Overview’, Buffalo Criminal Law Review 3(1): (1999), pp. 3–31.10.1525/nclr.1999.3.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A. ‘A Criminal Law for Citizens’, Theoretical Criminology 14(3): (2010), pp. 292–309.10.1177/1362480610369784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A. ‘Answering for Crime’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106(1): (2005), pp. 87–113.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2006.00140.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A. ‘Criminal Law and the Constitution of Civil Order’, University of Toronto Law Journal 70(1): (2020), pp. 4–26.10.3138/utlj.2019-0077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A. ‘Criminal Responsibility and the Emotions: If Anger and Fear Can Exculpate, Why Not Compassion?’, Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Law and Philosophy 58(2): (2015), pp. 189–220.10.1080/0020174X.2015.986855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A. ‘Responsibility and Reciprocity’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21(4): (2018), pp. 775–787.10.1007/s10677-018-9898-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A. ‘The Intrusion of Mercy’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 4(2): (2007), pp. 361–387.Google Scholar
Dunn, M. C., Clare, I. C. H., & Holland, A. J., ‘To Empower or To Protect? Constructing the “Vulnerable Adult” in English Law and Public Policy’, Legal Studies 28(2): (2008), pp. 234–253.10.1111/j.1748-121X.2008.00085.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnescu, I. ‘Pains of Probation: Effective Practice and Human Rights’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 55(4): (2011), pp. 530–545.10.1177/0306624X10369489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnescu, I., Griffin, M., & Scott, J., ‘Developing an Irish Offender Supervision Framework: A Whole System Approach’, Irish Probation Journal 17: (2020), pp. 24–42.Google Scholar
Ecclestone, K. ‘Changing the Subject of Education? A Critical Evaluation of “Vulnerability Creep” and Its Implications’, Social Policy and Society 16(3): (2017), pp. 443–456.10.1017/S1474746417000082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgely, M. ‘Criminals and (Second-Class) Citizenship: 21st Century Attainder?’, Griffith Law Review 19(3): (2010), pp. 403–437.10.1080/10383441.2010.10854683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Editorial, ‘Adjusting the Boundaries of Murder: Partial Defences and Complicity’, Criminal Law Review 11: (2008), pp. 829–830.Google Scholar
Eells, T. D. & Showalter, C. R., ‘Work-Related Stress in American Trial Judges’, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online 22(1): (1994), pp. 71–83.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. ‘Manifesto for a Relational Sociology’, American Journal of Sociology 103(2): (1997), pp. 281–317.10.1086/231209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EskridgeJr., W. N. ‘Relationship between Obligations and Rights of Citizens’, Fordham Law Review 69(5): (2001), pp. 1721–1751.Google Scholar
Fahey, E. M., Groschadl, L., & Weaver, B., ‘“The Angels That Surrounded My Cradle”: The History, Evolution, and Application of the Insanity Defense’, Buffalo Law Review 68(3): (2020), pp. 805–856.Google Scholar
Falk, P. J. ‘Novel Theories of Criminal Defense Based Upon the Toxicity of the Social Environment: Urban Psychosis, Television Intoxication, and Black Rage’, North Carolina Law Review 74(3): (1996), pp. 731–812.Google Scholar
Falls, M. ‘Retribution, Reciprocity, and Respect for Persons’, Law and Philosophy 6(1): (1987), pp. 25–51.10.1007/BF00142639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, L. ‘Time and Space in Criminal Law’, New Criminal Law Review 13(2): (2010), pp. 333–356.10.1525/nclr.2010.13.2.333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazel, S., Hayes, A. J., Bartellas, K., Clerici, M., & Trestman, R., ‘Mental Health of Prisoners: Prevalence, Adverse Outcomes, and Interventions’, Lancet Psychiatry 3(9): (2016), pp. 871–881.10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30142-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, M. ‘Feminism, Masculinities and Multiple Identities’, Nevada Law Journal 13(2): (2013), pp. 619–640.Google Scholar
Fineman, M. A. ‘The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State’, Emory Law Journal 60(2): (2010), pp. 251–275.Google Scholar
Fineman, M. A. ‘The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20(1): (2008), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Fish, M. J. ‘An Eye for an Eye: Proportionality as a Moral Principle of Punishment’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28(1): (2008), pp. 57–71.10.1093/ojls/gqm027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitz-Gibbon, K. ‘Homicide Law Reform in New South Wales: Examining the Merits of the Partial Defence of “Extreme” Provocation’, Melbourne University Law Review 40(3): (2017), pp. 769–815.Google Scholar
Fitz-Gibbon, K. ‘Protections for Children Before the Law: An Empirical Analysis of the Age of Criminal Responsibility, the Abolition of Doli Incapax and the Merits of a Developmental Immaturity Defence in England and Wales’, Criminology & Criminal Justice 16(4): (2016), pp. 391–409.10.1177/1748895816632579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitz-Gibbon, K. & Pickering, S., ‘Homicide Law Reform in Victoria, Australia’, British Journal of Criminology 52(1): (2021), pp. 159–180.10.1093/bjc/azr060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, G. P. ‘Political Theory and Criminal Law’, Criminal Justice Ethics 25(1): (2010), pp. 18–38.10.1080/0731129X.2006.9992192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, R. G. ‘Adequate (Non) Provocation and Heat of Passion as Excuse Not Justification’, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 43(1): (2009), pp. 27–52.10.36646/mjlr.43.1.adequateCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. ‘From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a “Post-Socialist” Age’, New Left Review 1(212): (1995).Google Scholar
Fraser, N. ‘Recognition or Redistribution? A Critical Reading of Iris Young’s Justice and the Politics of Difference’, Journal of Political Philosophy 3(2): (1995), pp. 166–180.10.1111/j.1467-9760.1995.tb00033.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N., Dahl, H. M., Stoltz, P., & Willig, R., ‘Recognition, Redistribution and Representation in Capitalist Global Society: An Interview with Nancy Fraser’, Acta Sociologica 47(4): (2004), pp. 374–382.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. ‘What’s the Point of Blame? A Paradigm Based Explanation’, Noûs 50(1): (2016), pp.165–183.10.1111/nous.12067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galoob, S. ‘Criminal Law and/as Political Theory’, Tulsa Law Review 55(2): (2020), pp. 203–212.Google Scholar
Gannage, M. ‘The Defence of Diminished Responsibility in Canadian Criminal Law’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal 19(2): (1981), pp. 301–320.10.60082/2817-5069.2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. ‘The Gist of Excuses’, Buffalo Criminal Law Review 1(2): (1998), pp. 577–598.10.1525/nclr.1998.1.2.575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. ‘The Logic of Excuses and the Rationality of Emotions’, Journal of Value Inquiry 43(3): (2009), pp. 315–338.10.1007/s10790-009-9181-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H. ‘Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies’, American Journal of Sociology 61(5): (1956) pp. 420–424.10.1086/221800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. ‘The Limits of the Sovereign State’, British Journal of Criminology 36(4): (1996), pp. 445–471.10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, S. P. ‘Agency and Insanity’, Buffalo Law Review 66(1): (2018), pp. 123–191.Google Scholar
Gault, B. A. & Sabini, J., ‘The Roles of Empathy, Anger, and Gender in Predicting Attitudes Toward Punitive, Reparative, and Preventative Public Policies’, Cognition and Emotion 14(4): (2000), pp. 495–520.10.1080/026999300402772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geenawalt, K. ‘The Cultural Defense: Reflections in Light of the Model Penal Code and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 6: (2009), pp. 299–321.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. ‘Diminished Responsibility in Golds and Beyond: Insights and Implications’, Criminal Law Review 7: (2017), pp. 543–553.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. ‘Pragmatism Preserved? The Challenges of Accommodating Mercy Killers in the Reformed Diminished Responsibility Plea’, The Journal of Criminal Law 81(3): (2017), pp. 177–200.10.1177/0022018317702801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginet, C. ‘In Defense of a Non-Causal Account of Reasons Explanations’, Journal of Ethics 12(3/4): (2008), pp. 229–237.10.1007/s10892-008-9033-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginet, C. ‘Reasons Explanation: Further Defense of a Non-Causal Account’, Journal of Ethics 20(1/3): (2016), pp. 219–228.10.1007/s10892-016-9232-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, L. ‘A Matter of Life and Death’, Medical Law Review 3(1): (1995), pp. 1–21.10.1093/medlaw/3.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, G. H., Chihuri, S., Blow, M., & Li, G., ‘Adverse Childhood Experiences and Justice System Contact: A Systematic Review’, Pediatrics 147(1): (2021), e2020021030.10.1542/peds.2020-021030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, S. P. ‘Is There Too Much Criminal Law?’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 6: (2009), pp. 737–749.Google Scholar
Greene, J. & Cohen, J., ‘For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything’, Law and the Brain 29(Nov.): (2004), pp. 1775–1785.Google Scholar
Griew, E. ‘Reducing Murder to Manslaughter: Whose Job?”, Journal of Medical Ethics 12(2): (1986), pp. 18–23.10.1136/jme.12.1.18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günther, K. ‘Nulla Poena Sine Culpa and Corporate Personhood’, Critical Quarterly for Legislation and Law 98(4): (2015), pp. 360–376.Google Scholar
Haggerty, K. D. & Bucerius, S., ‘The Proliferating Pains of Imprisonment’, Incarceration 1(1): (2020), https://doi.org/10.1177/2632666320936432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. ‘The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment’, Psychological Review 108(4): (2001), pp. 814–834.10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall Williams, J. E. ‘Irresistible Impulse and Diminished Responsibility’, Modern Law Review 24(1): (1961), pp. 164–166.Google Scholar
Hallett, N. ‘Psychiatric Evidence in Diminished Responsibility’, Journal of Criminal Law 82(6): (2018), pp. 442–456.10.1177/0022018318801677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halse, C., Hartung, C., & Wright, J., ‘Responsibility and Responsibilisation in Education’, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 38(1): (2017), p. 1.Google Scholar
Hamann, T. H. ‘Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and Ethics’, Foucault Studies 6(Feb.): (2009), pp. 37–59.10.22439/fs.v0i0.2471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, C. ‘Reconceptualising Penalty: Towards a Multidimensional Measure of Punitiveness’, The British Journal of Criminology 54(2): (2014), pp. 321–343.10.1093/bjc/azt075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, J. ‘Correcting Harms Versus Righting Wrongs: The Goal of Retribution’, UCLA Law Review 39(6): (1992), pp. 1659–1702.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. & Hanson, K., ‘The Blame Frame: Justifying (Racial) Injustice in America’, Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 41(2): (2006), pp. 413–480.Google Scholar
Harris, A. J. & Socia, K. M., ‘What’s in a Name? Evaluating the Effects of the “Sex Offender” Label on Public Opinions and Beliefs’, Sexual Abuse 28(7): (2016), pp. 660–678.10.1177/1079063214564391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HartJr., H. M. ‘The Aims of the Criminal Law’, Law and Contemporary Problems 23(3): (1958), pp. 401–441.10.2307/1190221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemming, A. ‘It’s Time to Abolish Diminished Responsibility, the Coach and Horses’ Defence Through Criminal Responsibility for Murder’, University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review 10: (2008), pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Hemming, A. ‘Provocation: A Totally Flawed Defence That Has No Place in Australian Criminal Law Irrespective of Sentencing Regime’, University of Western Sydney Law Review 14(1): (2010), pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Hill, R. A. ‘Character, Choice, and “Aberrant Behavior”’, The University of Chicago Law Review 65(3): (1998), pp. 975–999.10.2307/1600304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honoré, T. ‘Being Responsible and Being a Victim of Circumstance: Maccabaean Lecture in Jurisprudence’, Proceedings of the British Academy 97: (1998), pp. 169–187.Google Scholar
Horder, J. ‘Criminal Culpability: The Possibility of a General Theory’, Law and Philosophy 12(2): (1993), pp. 193–215.10.1007/BF02346478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horder, J. ‘Pleading Involuntary Lack of Capacity’, Cambridge Law Journal 52(2): (1993), pp. 298–318.10.1017/S0008197300095179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulley, J. L. ‘“While This Does Not in Any Way Excuse My Conduct …”: The Role of Treatment and Neutralizations in Desistance from Sexual Offending’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 60(15): (2016), pp. 1711–1790.10.1177/0306624X16668177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter-Blair, C. & Tonner-Barthet, C., ‘The Grounds for Excuse Shifts: An Analysis of the Law of Provocation in Ireland’, Irish Criminal Law Journal 31(2): (2021), pp. 36–44.Google Scholar
Husak, D. ‘Partial Defenses’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 11(1): (1998), pp. 167–192.10.1017/S0841820900001739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D. ‘Retributivism and Over-Punishment’, Law and Philosophy 41(2–3): (2022), pp. 169–191.10.1007/s10982-021-09422-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D. ‘Retributivism in Extremis’, Law and Philosophy 32(1): (2013), pp. 3–31.10.1007/s10982-012-9145-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D. ‘The Price of Criminal Law Skepticism: Ten Functions of the Criminal Law’, New Journal of Criminal Law 23(1): (2020), pp. 27–59.10.1525/nclr.2020.23.1.27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, D. N. ‘Why Punish the Deserving?’ Noûs 26(4): (1992), pp. 447–464.10.2307/2216023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichheiser, G. ‘Misunderstandings in Human Relations: A Study in False Social Perception’, American Journal of Sociology, 55(Suppl.): (1949), pp. 1–70.10.1086/220526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, B. S. ‘Truth or Proof? The Criminal Verdict’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law XI(33): (1998), pp. 227–273.10.1007/BF01110409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, E. L. ‘Imperfect Insanity and Diminished Responsibility’, Florida Law Review 76(3): (2024), pp. 533–636.Google Scholar
Johnston, E. L., Gliser, C. P., Haney, J. P., Formon, D. L., Hashimoto, N., & Rossbach, N., ‘Extreme Emotional Disturbance: Legal Frameworks and Considerations for Forensic Evaluation’, Behavioral Sciences & the Law 40(6): (2022), pp. 733–755.10.1002/bsl.2580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadish, S. H. ‘Excusing Crime’, California Law Review 75(1): (1987), pp. 257–290.10.2307/3480580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, R. ‘Responsibility, Luck, and Chance: Reflections on Free Will and Indeterminism’, The Journal of Philosophy 96(5): (1999), pp. 217–240.Google Scholar
Katz, L. D. ‘How Victims Matter: Rethinking the Significance of the Victim in Criminal Theory’, University of Toronto Law Journal 73(3): (2023), pp. 263–292.10.3138/utlj-2021-0091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L. D. ‘The Dogma of Opposing Welfare and Retribution’, Legal Theory 29(1): (2023), pp. 2–28.10.1017/S1352325223000137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, A. ‘Does Situationist Psychology Have Radical Implications for Criminal Responsibility?’, Alabama Law Review 59(3): (2008), pp. 611–678.Google Scholar
Kaye, A. ‘Resurrecting the Causal Theory of the Excuses’, Nebraska Law Review 83(4): (2005), pp. 1116–1177.Google Scholar
Kaye, A. ‘The Secret Politics of the Compatibilist Criminal Law’, Kansas Law Review 55(2): (2007), pp. 365–427.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. M. ‘The Early History of Murder and Manslaughter’, Law Quarterly Review 83: (1967), pp. 365–395.Google Scholar
Keith, L. ‘Some Observations on Diminished Responsibility’, Medico-Legal Journal 27(1): (1959), pp. 4–15.Google Scholar
Kelly, E. I. ‘Is Blame Warranted in Applying Justice?’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26(1): (2023), pp. 71–87.10.1080/13698230.2021.1893253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, E. I. ‘What Is Justice?’, Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy 18(Suppl.): (2020), pp. 889–903.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. ‘Inequality and Crime’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 82(4): (2000), pp. 530–539.10.1162/003465300559028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemshall, H. ‘Effective Practice in Probation: An Example of “Advanced Liberal” Responsibilisation?’, The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 41(1): (2002), pp. 41–58.10.1111/1468-2311.00224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. ‘“Ungovernable Feelings and Passions”: Common Sense Philosophy and Mental State Defences in Nineteenth Century Scotland’, The Edinburgh Law Review 20(3): (2016), pp. 285–311.10.3366/elr.2016.0360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennefick, L. ‘Beyond Homicide? The Feasibility of Extending the Doctrine of Partial Excuse Across All Offence Categories’, Criminal Law Forum 33(4): (2022), pp. 323–357.10.1007/s10609-022-09446-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennefick, L. ‘Diminished Responsibility in Ireland: Historical Reflections on the Doctrine and Present-Day Analysis of the Law’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 62(3): (2011), pp. 269–289.10.53386/nilq.v62i3.420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennefick, L. ‘Introducing a New Diminished Responsibility Defence for England and Wales’, Modern Law Review 74(5): (2011), pp. 750–766.10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00869.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennefick, L. ‘Verdict as a Site of Social (In)justice: More Groundwork for a Multivalent Approach’, Howard League for Penal Reform ECAN Bulletin (44): (2020), pp. 10–17.Google Scholar
Kennefick, L. ‘What the Doctor Ordered: Revisiting the Relationship between Psychiatry and the Law in the UK and Ireland’, Cork Online Law Review 7: (2008), pp. 58–70.Google Scholar
Kerber, L. K. ‘Meanings of Citizenship’, The Journal of American History 84(3): (1997), pp. 833–854.10.2307/2953082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, D. S. ‘Prisoner Reentry and the Reproduction of Legal Cynicism’, Social Problems 63(2): (2016), pp. 222–243.10.1093/socpro/spw003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitta, E. F. ‘Welfare, Dependency, and a Public Ethic of Care’, Social Justice, 25(1): (1998), pp. 123–145.Google Scholar
Krash, A. ‘The Durham Rule and Judicial Administration of the Insanity Defense in the District of Columbia’, The Yale Law Journal 70(6): (1961), pp. 905–952.10.2307/794426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, M. W. & Keltner, D., ‘Social Class Rank, Essentialism, and Punitive Judgment’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2): (2013), pp. 247–261.10.1037/a0032895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, J. T., Mojdehbakhsh, R., Raio, C., Brosch, T., Uleman, J. S., & Phelps, E. A., ‘Stressing the Person: Legal and Everyday Person Attributions Under Stress’, Biological Psychology 103(Dec.): (2014), pp. 117–124.10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. & Norman, W., ‘Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory’, Ethics 104(2): (1994), pp. 352–382.10.1086/293605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labbe, E., Blanquet, M., Gerbaud, L., Poirier, G., Sass, C., Vendittelli, F., & Moulin, J. J., ‘A New Reliable Index to Measure Individual Deprivation: The EPICES Score’, European Journal of Public Health 25(4): (2015), pp. 604–609.10.1093/eurpub/cku231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. ‘Responsibility and Modernity in Criminal Law’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 9(3): (2001), pp. 249–276.10.1111/1467-9760.00127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. ‘Socializing the Subject of Criminal Law? Criminal Responsibility and the Purposes of Criminalization’, Marquette Law Review 99(3): (2016), pp. 541–557.Google Scholar
Lacey, N. ‘Space, Time and Function: Intersecting Principles of Responsibility Across the Terrain of Criminal Justice’, Criminal Law and Philosophy 1(3): (2007), pp. 233–250.10.1007/s11572-006-9025-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. ‘The Metaphor of Proportionality’, Journal of Law and Society 43(1): (2016), pp. 27–44.10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00739.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. & Pickard, H., ‘A Dual-Process Approach to Criminal Law: Victims and the Clinical Model of Responsibility Without Blame’, Journal of Political Philosophy 27(2): (2018), pp. 226–251.Google Scholar
Lacey, N. & Pickard, H., ‘From the Consulting Room to the Court Room? Taking the Clinical Model of Responsibility Without Blame Into the Legal Realm’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33(1): (2013), pp. 1–29.10.1093/ojls/gqs028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. & Pickard, H., ‘The Chimera of Proportionality: Institutionalising Limits on Punishment in Contemporary Social and Political Systems’, The Modern Law Review 78(2): (2015), pp. 216–240.10.1111/1468-2230.12114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. & Pickard, H., ‘To Blame or To Forgive? Reconciling Punishment and Forgiveness in Criminal Justice’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 35(4): (2015), pp. 665–696.Google Scholar
Lambert, E. W. ‘A Way Out of the “Rotten Social Background” Stalemate: “Scarcity” and Stephen Morse’s Proposed Generic Partial Excuse’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change 21(4): (2018), pp. 298–338.Google Scholar
Lemke, T. ‘“The Birth of Bio-Politics”: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-Liberal Governmentality’, Economy and Society 30(2): (2001), pp. 190–207.10.1080/03085140120042271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, R. M., Bornstein, M. H., & Jervis, P., ‘The Development of Positive Attributes of Character: On the Embodiment of Specificity, Holism, and Self-System Processes’, Human Development 66(1): (2022), pp. 34–47.10.1159/000521583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, K. L. ‘Negotiating the Boundaries of Crime and Culture: A Sociolegal Perspective on Cultural Defense Strategies’, Law & Social Inquiry 28(1): (2003), pp. 39–86 at p. 44.10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00992.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, K. ‘Does Situationism Excuse? The Implications of Situationism for Moral Responsibility and Criminal Responsibility’, Arkansas Law Review 68(3): (2015), pp. 731–787.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, L., Ungar, M., & Ikeda, J., ‘Neo-Liberalism and Responsibilisation in the Discourse of Social Service Workers’ British Journal of Social Work 45(3): (2013), pp. 1006–1021.10.1093/bjsw/bct172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, B. G. & Phelan, J. C., ‘Conceptualizing Stigma’, Annual Review of Sociology 27(1): (2001), pp. 363–385.10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippke, R. L. ‘Retributive Parsimony’, Res Publica 15(4): (2009), pp. 377–395.10.1007/s11158-009-9101-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livings, B. ‘A New Partial Defence for the Mercy Killer: Revisiting Loss of Control’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 65(2): (2014), pp. 187–204.10.53386/nilq.v65i2.209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loader, I. ‘For Penal Moderation: Notes Towards a Public Philosophy of Punishment’, Theoretical Criminology 14(3): (2010), pp. 349–367.10.1177/1362480610370166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughnan, A. ‘Introducing Relations of Criminal Responsibility between Self, Others and the State’, Journal of Legal Philosophy 46(1): (2021), pp. 51–56.10.4337/jlp.2021.01.03CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughnan, A. ‘The Meta-Significance of Criminal Responsibility’, Critical Analysis of Law 4(1): (2017), pp. 31–41.10.33137/cal.v4i1.28146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu-Myers, Y. & Ghaferi, A. A., ‘Excising the “Surgeon Ego” to Accelerate Progress in the Culture of Surgery’, BMJ 363(Nov.): (2018), k4537.10.1136/bmj.k4537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, R. ‘“Nature”, “Quality” and Mens Rea – Some Observations on “Defect of Reason” and the First Limb of the M’Naghten Rules’, Criminal Law Review 7: (2020), p. 588.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. ‘What’s Happening with the Reformed Diminished Responsibility Plea?’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 72(2): (2021), pp. 224–244.10.53386/nilq.v72i2.873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, R. D. ‘The Abnormality of Mind Factor in Diminished Responsibility’, Criminal Law Review (2): (1999), pp. 117–125.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. D. ‘The Impairment Factors in the New Diminished Responsibility Plea’, Criminal Law Review 6: (2018), pp. 462–471.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. D. & Mitchell, B. J., ‘Provoking Diminished Responsibility: Two Pleas Merging Into One?’, Criminal Law Review 11: (2003), pp. 745–759.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. D. & Mitchell, B., ‘The New Diminished Responsibility Plea in Operation: Some Initial Findings’, Criminal Law Review 1: (2017), pp. 18–35.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. ‘Relational Autonomy, Normative Authority and Perfectionism’, Journal of Social Philosophy 39(4): (2008), pp. 512–533.10.1111/j.1467-9833.2008.00440.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, D. A., Courtright, K. E., & Packard, S. H., ‘Testing the Rehabilitative Ideal Among College Students’, Criminal Justice Studies 19(2): (2006), pp. 153–170.10.1080/14786010600764534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manikis, M. ‘A New Model of the Criminal Justice Process: Victims’ Rights as Advancing Penal Parsimony and Moderation’, Criminal Law Forum 30(2): (2019) pp. 201–233.10.1007/s10609-018-09362-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manikis, M. ‘The Principle of Proportionality in Sentencing: A Dynamic Evolution and Multiplication of Conceptions’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal 59(3): (2022), pp. 587–628.10.60082/2817-5069.3812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. E. & Duff, R. A., ‘Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 11(1): (1998), pp. 7–22.10.1017/S0841820900001661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. W. & Heiphetz, L., ‘“Internally Wicked”: Investigating How and Why Essentialism Influences Punitiveness and Moral Condemnation’, Cognitive Science 45(6): (2021), e12991.10.1111/cogs.12991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruna, S. & King, A., ‘Once a Criminal, Always a Criminal? “Redeemability” and the Psychology of Punitive Public Attitudes’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 15(1): (2009), pp. 7–24.10.1007/s10610-008-9088-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruna, S. & Mann, R. E., ‘A Fundamental Attribution Error? Rethinking Cognitive Distortions’, Legal and Criminological Psychology 11(2): (2006), pp. 155–177.10.1348/135532506X114608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, I. & Booth, N., ‘Using Techniques of Neutralisation to Maintain Contact: The Experiences of Loved Ones Supporting Remand Prisoners’, The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 61(4): (2022), pp. 463–483.10.1111/hojo.12489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheson, B. ‘Blameworthiness is Terminable’, The Philosophical Quarterly 75(2): (2025), pp. 671–692.10.1093/pq/pqad127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R. ‘The Myth of Punitiveness’, Theoretical Criminology 9(2): (2005), pp. 175–201.10.1177/1362480605051639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDiarmid, C. ‘An Age of Complexity: Children and Criminal Responsibility in Law’, Youth Justice 13(2): (2013), pp. 145–160.10.1177/1473225413492056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDiarmid, C. ‘Between Accidental Killing and Murder: Culpable Homicide’, Juridical Review 2023(1): (2023), pp. 19–47.Google Scholar
McLintock, K. & Sheard, L., ‘Prison Healthcare in England and Wales Is in Perpetual Crisis’, British Medical Journal 384(Mar.): (2024), q562.10.1136/bmj.q562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, A. ‘Character Problems as Collective Behavior’, Symbolic Interaction 43(4): (2020), pp. 657–691.10.1002/symb.520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, L. & Quilter, J., ‘The “Bikie Effect” and Other Forms of Demonisation: The Origins and Effects of Hyper-Criminalisation’, Law in Context 34(2): (2016), pp. 5–35.Google Scholar
McNamara, L., Quilter, J., Hogg, R., Douglas, H., Loughnan, A., & Brown, D., ‘Theorising Criminalisation: The Value of a Modalities Approach’, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 7(3): (2018), pp. 91–121.10.5204/ijcjsd.v7i3.511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, F. ‘Mass Supervision, Misrecognition and the “Malopticon”’, Punishment & Society 21(2): (2019), pp. 207–230.10.1177/1462474518755137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, R. ‘Battered Woman Syndrome, Diminished Responsibility and Women Who Kill: Insights from Scottish Case Law’, Journal of Criminal Law 83(5): (2019), pp. 381–393.10.1177/0022018319858506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, R. ‘Diminished Responsibility Post Codification: Lost Opportunities, Tensions and Gendered Applications’, Edinburgh Law Review 25(2): (2021), pp. 173–191.10.3366/elr.2021.0693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, R. ‘“Fit for Purpose in Today’s Society?” Reflecting on Provocation Pleas in Modern Scotland’, The Journal of Criminal Law 87(2): (2023), pp. 97–108.10.1177/00220183231165813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, R. ‘Reflecting on Legal Responses to Intimate Partner Femicide in Scotland’, Violence Against Women 29(3–4): (2022), pp. 686–704.10.1177/10778012221094068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menges, L. ‘The Emotion Account of Blame’, Philosophical Studies 174(1): (2017), pp. 257–273.10.1007/s11098-016-0680-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messinger, A. M. ‘Invisible Victims: Same-Sex IPV in the National Violence Against Women Survey’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 26(11): (2011), pp. 2228–2243.10.1177/0886260510383023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. K. & Bornstein, B. H., ‘Juror Stress: Causes and Interventions’, Thurgood Marshall Law Review 30(Fall): (2004), pp. 237–269.Google Scholar
Minkowitz, T. ‘Rethinking Criminal Responsibility from a Critical Disability Perspective: The Abolition of Insanity/Incapacity Acquittals and Unftness to Plead, and Beyond’, Griffith Law Review 23(3): (2014), pp. 434–466.10.1080/10383441.2014.1013177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. ‘Diminished Responsibility Manslaughter’, Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 8(1): (1997), pp. 107–117.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. ‘Putting Diminished Responsibility Law Into Practice: A Forensic Psychiatric Perspective’, Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 8(3): (1997), pp. 620–634.10.1080/09585189708412280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. & Mackay, R. D., ‘The Golds Standard of Substantial Impairment’, Archbold Review 4: (2015), pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
Moore, K. E., Stuewig, J. B., & Tangney, J. P., ‘The Effect of Stigma on Criminal Offenders’ Functioning: A Longitudinal Mediational Model’, Deviant Behavior 37(2): (2016), pp. 196–218.10.1080/01639625.2014.1004035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. S. ‘Causation and the Excuses’, California Law Review 73(4): (1985), pp. 1091–1150.10.2307/3480429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. S. ‘The Determinist Theory of Excuses Reviewed Work(s): Madness and the Criminal Law by Norval Morris’, Ethics 95(4): (1985), pp. 909–919.10.1086/292692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, H. ‘Persons and Punishment’, The Monist 52(4): (1968), pp. 475–501.10.5840/monist196852436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, S. J. ‘Culpability and Control’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142(5): (1994), pp. 1587–1660.10.2307/3312464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, S. J. ‘Diminished Rationality, Diminished Responsibility’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 1(1): (2003), pp. 289–308.Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. ‘Excusing and the New Excuse Defenses: A Legal and Conceptual Review’, Crime and Justice 23(Mar.): (1998), pp. 329–406.10.1086/449273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, S. J. ‘Excusing the Crazy: The Insanity Defence Reconsidered’, Southern California Law Review 58(3): (1985), pp. 777–836.Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. ‘Inevitable Mens Rea’, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 27(1): (2003), pp. 51–64.Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. ‘New Neuroscience, Old Problems: Legal Implications of Brain Science’, Cerebrum 6(4): (2004), pp. 81–90.Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. ‘Rationality and Responsibility’, Southern California Law Review 74(1): (2000), p. 251.Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. ‘The Twilight of Welfare Criminology: A Reply to Judge Bazelon’, Southern California Law Review 49(6): (1976), pp. 1247–1268.Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. ‘Undiminished Confusion in Diminished Capacity’, Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 75(1): (1984), pp. 1–55.10.2307/1143205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousourakis, G. ‘Character, Choice and Criminal Responsibility’, Les Cahiers de Droit 39(1): (1998), pp. 51–73.10.7202/043479arCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustalahti, I., Gutiérrez-Zamora, V., Hyle, M., Devkota, B. P., & Tokola, N., ‘Responsibilization in Natural Resources Governance: A Romantic Doxa?’, Forest Policy and Economics 111(Feb.): (2020), 102033.10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naffine, N. ‘The Liberal Legal Individual Accused: The Relational Case’, Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 29(1): (2014), pp. 123–132.10.1017/cls.2013.42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naffine, N. ‘The Ontology of Criminal Law: A Commentary on Arlie Loughnan, Self, Others and the State’, Journal of Legal Philosophy 46(1): (2021), pp. 67–72.10.4337/jlp.2021.01.06CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naffine, N. ‘Who Are Law’s Persons? From Cheshire Cats to Responsible Subjects’, Modern Law Review 66(3): (2003), pp. 346–367.10.1111/1468-2230.6603002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, C. & Dioso-Villa, R., ‘Australia’s Divergent Legal Responses to Women Who Kill Their Abusive Partners’, Violence Against Women 30(9): (2024), pp. 2275–2301.10.1177/10778012231156154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasser, M. ‘The Rise and Fall of Anti-Psychiatry’, Psychiatric Bulletin 19(12): (1995), pp. 743–746.10.1192/pb.19.12.743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, R. & Medland, S., ‘Psychiatric Expert Evidence and the New Partial Defences of Diminished Responsibility and Loss of Control’, BJPsych Advances 22(4): (2016), 277–284.10.1192/apt.bp.114.014431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, G. E. & Knobe, J., ‘The Essence of Essentialism’, Mind & Language 34(5): (2019), pp. 585–605.10.1111/mila.12226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, K. G. & Giebler, M. A., ‘The Neuroscience of Socioeconomic Inequality’, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 36(Dec.): (2020), pp. 23–28.10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrie, A. ‘A Critique of Criminal Causation’, Modern Law Review 54(5): (1991), pp. 685–701.10.1111/j.1468-2230.1991.tb02662.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrie, A. ‘Critical Realism and the Metaphysics of Justice’, Journal of Critical Realism 15(4): (2016), pp. 391–408.10.1080/14767430.2016.1195568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrie, A. ‘From Criminal Law to Legal Theory: The Mysterious Case of the Reasonable Glue Sniffer’, Modern Law Review 65(4): (2002), pp. 538–555.10.1111/1468-2230.00394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrie, A. ‘The Coroners and Justice Act 2009 – Partial Defences to Murder (1) Loss of Control’, Criminal Law Review 4: (2010), pp. 275–289.Google Scholar
Norrie, A. ‘The Limits of Justice: Finding Fault in the Criminal Law’, Modern Law Review 59(4): (1996), pp. 540–556.10.1111/j.1468-2230.1966.tb02097.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrie, A. ‘The Structure of Provocation’, Current Legal Problems 54(1): (2001), pp. 307–346.10.1093/clp/54.1.307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nourse, V. ‘Passion’s Progress: Model Law Reform and the Provocation Defense’, Yale Law Journal 106(5): (1997), pp. 1331–1448.10.2307/797186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nourse, V. ‘The New Normativity: The Abuse Excuse and the Resurgence of Judgment in the Criminal Law’, Stanford Law Review 50(4): (1998), pp. 1453–1470.10.2307/1229290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Malley, T. ‘Review: Insanity, Psychiatry and Criminal Responsibility by Finbarr McAuley’, Irish Jurist 28/30: (1993/1995), pp. 426–430.Google Scholar
Olusanya, O. ‘Excuse and Mitigation Under International Criminal Law: Redrawing Conceptual Boundaries’, New Criminal Law Review 13(1): (2010), pp. 23–89.10.1525/nclr.2010.13.1.23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacios-Barrios, E. E. & Hanson, J. L., ‘Poverty and Self-Regulation: Connecting Psychosocial Processes, Neurobiology, and the Risk for Psychopathology’, Comprehensive Psychiatry 90(April): (2019), pp. 52–64.10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.12.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, R. ‘Manufacturing Responsibility: The Governmentality of Behavioural Power in Social Policies’, Social Policy and Society 18(1): (2019), pp. 51–65.10.1017/S147474641700046XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peroni, L. & Timmer, A., ‘Vulnerable Groups: The Promise of an Emerging Concept in European Human Rights Convention Law’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 11(4): (2013), pp. 1056–1085.10.1093/icon/mot042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, M. A. ‘The End of Neoliberal Globalisation and the Rise of Authoritarian Populism’, Educational Philosophy and Theory 50(4): (2018), pp. 323–325.10.1080/00131857.2017.1305720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petherbridge, D. ‘Recognition, Vulnerability and Trust’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 29(1): (2021), pp. 1–23.10.1080/09672559.2021.1885135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, D. & Knobe, J., ‘The Pervasive Impact of Moral Judgment’, Mind & Language 24(5): (2009), pp. 586–604.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01375.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, E. G. ‘Conceptualizing and Measuring “Punitiveness” in Contemporary Advanced Democracies’, Regulation & Governance 18(2): (2023), pp. 573–589.10.1111/rego.12533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phoenix, J. & Kelly, L., ‘“You Have to Do It for Yourself”: Responsibilization in Youth Justice and Young People’s Situated Knowledge of Youth Justice Practice’, British Journal of Criminology 53(3): (2013), pp. 419–437.10.1093/bjc/azs078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickard, H. ‘Responsibility in Healthcare: What’s the Point?’, Journal of Medical Ethics 45(10): (2019), pp. 650–651.10.1136/medethics-2019-105829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickard, H. ‘Responsibility Without Blame: Empathy and the Effective Treatment of Personality Disorder’, Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 18(3): (2011), pp. 209–224.10.1353/ppp.2011.0032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickard, H. ‘Responsibility Without Blame: Therapy, Philosophy, Law’, Prison Service Journal 213(May): (2014), pp. 10–16.Google Scholar
Pickard, H. ‘Rethinking Justice: The Clinical Model of Responsibility Without Blame’, The Howard League for Penal Reform ECAN Bulletin 36: (2018), pp. 4–10.Google Scholar
Pleasants, N. J. ‘Free Will, Determinism and the “Problem” of Structure and Agency in the Social Sciences’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 49(1): (2019), pp. 3–84.10.1177/0048393118814952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pols, J. ‘Mental Illness and Rationality: A Critique’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 12(1): (1989), pp. 71–79.10.1016/0160-2527(89)90015-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porro, C. ‘Criminal Blame, Exclusion and Moral Dialogue’, Criminal Law, Philosophy 15(2): (2021), pp. 223–235.10.1007/s11572-021-09563-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. A. ‘Cost-Benefit Analysis: Definition, Justification, and Comment on Conference Papers’, Journal of Legal Studies 29(2): (2000), pp. 1153–1177.10.1086/468108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prendergast, D. ‘Judicial Stewardship of the Provocation Defence in People (DPP) v McNamara’, Irish Supreme Court Review 3: (2021), p. 69.Google Scholar
Proag, V. ‘The Concept of Vulnerability and Resilience’, Procedia Economics and Finance 18: (2014), pp. 369–376.10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00952-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pronin, E. ‘How We See Ourselves and How We See Others’, Science 320(5880): (2008), pp. 1177–1180.10.1126/science.1154199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, P. ‘The Responsible Subject as Citizen: Criminal Law, Democracy and the Welfare State’, Modern Law Review 69(1): 2006, pp. 29–58.10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00575.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, C. ‘Provoking Change: Comparative Insights on Feminist Homicide Reform’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100(1): (2010), pp. 33–108.Google Scholar
Reader, S. ‘The Other Side of Agency’, Philosophy 82(4): (2010), pp. 579–604.10.1017/S0031819107000162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, A., Wake, N., & Simpson, B. (eds.), ‘Domestic and Comparative Perspectives on Loss of Self-control and Diminished Responsibility as Partial Defences to Murder: A 10-Year Review of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 Reform Framework’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 72(2): (2021) (Special Issue).10.53386/nilq.v72i2.930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimonte, N. ‘A Question of Culture: Cultural Approval of Violence Against Women in the Pacific-Asian Community and the Cultural Defense’, Stanford Law Review 43(6): (1991), pp. 1311–1326.10.2307/1229041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, A. ‘Justice and Responsibility’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 17(2): (2004), pp. 361–386.10.1017/S0841820900003957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritsher, J. B., Otilingam, P. G., & Grajales, M., ‘Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness: Psychometric Properties of a New Measure’, Psychiatry Research 121(1): (2003), pp. 31–49.10.1016/j.psychres.2003.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera, B. & Widom, C. S., ‘Childhood Victimization and Violent Offending’, Violence & Victims 5(1): (1990), pp. 19–35.10.1891/0886-6708.5.1.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. ‘Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice’, Social Theory and Practice 34(3): (2008), pp. 341–362.10.5840/soctheorpract200834321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. ‘Mitigations: The Forgotten Side of the Proportionality Principle’, Harvard Journal on Legislation 57(1): (2020) pp. 219–271.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H. ‘Are We Responsible for Who We Are? The Challenge for Criminal Law Theory in the Defenses of Coercive Indoctrination and “Rotten Social Background”’, Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review 2(1): (2011), pp. 53–77.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H. ‘Criminal Law Defenses: A Systematic Analysis’, Columbia Law Review 82(2): (1982), pp. 199–291.10.2307/1122275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. H. ‘Rules of Conduct and Principles of Adjudication’, University of Chicago Law Review 57(3): (1990), pp. 729–771.10.2307/1600018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. H., Gaeta, T., Majarian, M., & Schulz, M., ‘The Modern Irrationalities of American Criminal Codes: An Empirical Study of Offense Grading’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100(3): (2010), pp. 709–764.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. L. ‘Oregon Legislation Relating to the Insanity Defense and the Psychiatric Security Review Board’, Williamette Law Review 18(1): (1981), pp. 23–48.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. A., Mackenzie, C., & Dodds, S., ‘Why Bioethics Needs a Concept of Vulnerability’, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5(2): (2012), pp. 11–38.10.3138/ijfab.5.2.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N. ‘Still “Like Birds on the Wire”? Freedom After Neoliberalism’, Economy and Society 46(3–4): (2017), pp. 303–323.10.1080/03085147.2017.1377947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N. & Miller, P., ‘Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government’, British Journal of Sociology 43(2): (1992), pp. 173–205.10.2307/591464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M., ‘Governmentality’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2(Dec.): (2006), pp. 83–104.10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, G. ‘Culpability and Moral Ignorance’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103(1): (2002), pp. 61–84.10.1111/1467-9264.00128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, L. ‘From the Fundamental Attribution Error to the Truly Fundamental Attribution Error and Beyond: My Research Journey’, Perspectives on Psychological Science 13(6): (2018), pp. 750–769.10.1177/1745691618769855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, L. ‘The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 10: (1977), pp. 173–220.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, L., Amabile, T. M., & Steinmetz, I. L., ‘Social Roles, Social Control, and Biases in Social Perception Processes’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35(7): (1977), pp. 485–494.10.1037/0022-3514.35.7.485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddick, S. ‘Abnormal, the “New Normal,” and Destabilizing Discourses of Rights’, Public Culture 18(1): (2006), pp. 53–78.10.1215/08992363-18-1-53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rufrancos, H. & Power, M., ‘Income Inequality and Crime: A Review and Explanation of the Time-Series Evidence’, Sociology and Criminology 1(1): (2013), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Rüsch, N., Angermeyer, M. C., & Corrigan, P. W., ‘Mental Illness Stigma: Concepts, Consequences, and Initiatives to Reduce Stigma’, European Psychiatry 20(8): (2005), pp. 529–539.10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryberg, J. ‘Punishing Adolescents – On Immaturity and Diminished Responsibility’, Neuroethics 7(3): (2014), pp. 327–336.10.1007/s12152-014-9203-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryberg, J. ‘Retributivism and the Dynamic Desert Model: Three Challenges to Dagan and Roberts’, Criminal Justice Ethics 40(1): (2021), pp. 56–67.10.1080/0731129X.2021.1900649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. J. & Smith, L. A., ‘Rethinking Criminal Propensity and Character: Cohort Inequalities and the Power of Social Change’, Crime and Justice 50(1): (2021), pp. 13–76.10.1086/716005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheff, T. ‘Updating Labelling Theory: Normalizing but not Enabling’, Nordic Journal of Social Research 1(1): (2010), pp. 1–7.10.7577/njsr.2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, S. ‘Justice and Desert in Liberal Theory’, California Law Review 88(3): (2000), pp. 965–990.10.2307/3481202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulhofer, S. J. ‘The Mathematician, the Monk, and the Militant: Reflections on the Role of Criminal Law Theory’, California Law Review 88(3): (2000), pp. 705–710.10.2307/3481189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. ‘Human Rights and Capabilities’, Journal of Human Development 6(2): (2005), pp. 151–166.10.1080/14649880500120491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, D. ‘Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability: Toward a Wider Theory of Responsibility’, Ethics 121(3): (2011), pp. 602–632.10.1086/659003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sifferd, K. L. ‘In Defense of the Use of Commonsense Psychology in the Criminal Law’, Law and Philosophy 25(6): (2006), pp. 571–612.10.1007/s10982-005-3802-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sifferd, K. L. ‘Why Not “Weak” Retributivism?’, Journal of Legal Philosophy 46(2): (2021), pp. 138–143.10.4337/jlp.2021.02.05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, J. R. ‘Moral Foundations, Intuitions of Justice, and the Intricacies of Punitive Sentiment’, Law & Society Review 51(2): (2017), pp. 413–450.10.1111/lasr.12264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. J. ‘Ideal and Nonideal Theory’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 38(1): (2010), pp. 5–36.10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01172.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, B. ‘R. v. Foy (Nicholas): Voluntary Intoxication, Mental Health and the Case for Diminished Responsibility’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 72(2): (2021), pp. 397–405.10.53386/nilq.v72i2.880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. ‘Criminalizing Vulnerability: Protecting “Vulnerable” Children and Punishing “Wicked” Mothers’, Social & Legal Studies 26(4): (2017), pp. 511–533.10.1177/0964663916682825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. ‘The Vulnerable (M)other and the Autonomous Legal Subject: Rethinking Vulnerability in Criminal Law’, International Journal of Law in Context 19(4): (2023), pp. 521–539.10.1017/S174455232300023XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skitka, L. J. & Mullen, E., ‘Understanding Judgments of Fairness in a Real-World Political Context: A Test of the Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(10): (2002), pp. 1419–1429.10.1177/014616702236873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobogin, C. ‘An End to Insanity: Recasting the Role of Mental Disability in Criminal Cases’, Virginia Law Review 86(6): (2000), pp. 1199–1248.10.2307/1073944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. ‘Responsibility as Answerability’, Inquiry 58(2): (2015), pp. 99–126.10.1080/0020174X.2015.986851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, C. R. & Higgins, R. I., ‘Excuses: Their Effective Role in the Negotiation of Reality’, Psychological Bulletin 104(1): (1988), pp. 23–35.10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyman, C. R. ‘Is There Such a Defence in Our Criminal Law as Emotional Stress?’, South African Law Journal 102(2): (1985), pp. 240–251.Google Scholar
Stannard, J. E. ‘The Merits of Ambiguity: Provocation from the Irish Perspective’, The Journal of Criminal Law 87(2): (2023), pp. 122–139.10.1177/00220183231165822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, C. A. ‘Respecting Human Dignity: Contract versus Capabilities’, Metaphilosophy 40(3–4): (2009), pp. 366–381.10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01605.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, F. ‘Killing the Unfaithful’, Cambridge Law Journal 71(2), pp. 260–263.10.1017/S0008197312000414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemplowska, Z. ‘What’s Ideal About Ideal Theory?’, Social Theory and Practice 34(3): (2008), pp. 319–340.10.5840/soctheorpract200834320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, H. ‘Contingency and Coherence: The Interdependence of Realism and Formalism in Legal Theory’, Valparaiso University Law Review 30(1): (1995), pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
Stockholm, K., Bojesen, A., Jensen, A. S., Juul, S., & Gravholt, C. H., ‘Criminality in Men with Klinefelter’s Syndrome and XYY Syndrome: A Cohort Study’, BMJ Open 2(1): (2012), e000650.10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. ‘Freedom and Resentment’, Proceedings of the British Academy 48: (1963), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Swift, A. ‘The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances’, Social Theory and Practice 34(3): (2008), pp. 363–387.10.5840/soctheorpract200834322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, G. M. & Matza, D., ‘Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency’, American Sociological Review 22(6): (1957), pp. 664–670.10.2307/2089195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadros, V. ‘Poverty and Criminal Responsibility’, Journal of Value Inquiry 43(3): (2009), pp. 391–413.10.1007/s10790-009-9180-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadros, V. ‘The Scope and Grounds of Responsibility’, New Criminal Law Review 11(1): (2008), pp. 91–118.10.1525/nclr.2008.11.1.91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanguay-Renaud, F. ‘Criminalizing the State’, Criminal Law and Philosophy 7(2): (2013), pp. 255–284.10.1007/s11572-012-9181-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taslitz, A. E. ‘The Rule of Criminal Law: Why Courts and Legislatures Ignore Richard Delgado’s Rotten Social Background’, Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review 2(1): (2011), pp. 79–132.Google Scholar
Testa, A., Jackson, D. B., Ganson, K. T., & Nagata, J. M., ‘Adverse Childhood Experiences and Criminal Justice Contact in Adulthood’, Academic Pediatrics 22(6): (2022), pp. 972–980.10.1016/j.acap.2021.10.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. ‘Social Functionalist Frameworks for Judgment and Choice: Intuitive Politicians, Theologians, and Prosecutors’, Psychological Review 109(3): (2002), pp. 451–471.10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., Visser, P. S., Singh, R., Polifroni, M., Scott, A., Elson, S. B., Mazzocco, P., & Rescober, P., ‘People as Intuitive Prosecutors: The Impact of Social-Control Goals on Attributions of Responsibility’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43(2): (2007), pp. 195–209.10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. ‘“Expert Shopping”: Appeals Adducing Fresh Evidence in Diminished Responsibility Cases’, Journal of Criminal Law 84(3): (2020), pp. 249–254.10.1177/0022018320921053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorburn, M. ‘Justifications, Powers and Authority’, Yale Law Journal 117(6): (2008), pp.1070–1130.10.2307/20454675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolmie, J. ‘Is the Partial Defence an Endangered Defence? Recent Proposals to Abolish Provocation’, New Zealand Law Review 25(1): (2005), pp. 25–52.Google Scholar
Ulbrick, M. G., Flynn, A., & Tyson, D., ‘An Argument for Diminished Culpability Manslaughter: Responding to Gaps in Victorian Homicide Law’, Monash University Law Review 45(1): (2019), pp. 201–231.Google Scholar
Valentini, L. ‘Dignity and Human Rights: A Reconceptualisation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 37(4): (2017), 862–885.10.1093/ojls/gqx011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentini, L. ‘Ideal vs. Non-Ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map’, Philosophy Compass 7(9): (2012), pp. 654–664.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00500.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varshney, M., Mahapatra, A., Krishnan, V., Gupta, R., & Sinha Deb, K., ‘Violence and Mental Illness: What Is the True Story?’, Epidemiology & Community Health 70(3): (2016), pp. 223–225.10.1136/jech-2015-205546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, I. & Tonkens, E., ‘Talking Active Citizenship: Framing Welfare State Reform in England and the Netherlands’, Social Policy and Society 12(3): (2013), pp. 415–426.10.1017/S1474746413000158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilcan, T. ‘Articulating Resilience in Practice: Chains of Responsibilisation, Failure Points and Political Contestation’, Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 5(1): (2017), pp. 29–43.10.1080/21693293.2016.1228157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virokannas, E., Liuski, S., & Kuronen, M., ‘The Contested Concept of Vulnerability – A Literature Review’, European Journal of Social Work 23(2): (2020), pp. 327–339.10.1080/13691457.2018.1508001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hirsch, A. ‘Equality, “Anisonomy”, and Justice’, Michigan Law Review 82(4): (1984), pp. 1093–1112.10.2307/1288718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hirsch, A. ‘Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment’, Crime and Justice 16: (1992), pp. 55–98.10.1086/449204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuoso, G. ‘Background, Responsibility, and Excuse’, Yale Law Journal 96(7): (1987), pp. 1661–1686.10.2307/796498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wake, N. & Reed, A., ‘Reconceptualising Sexual Infidelity Provocation: New Anglo-Scottish Reform Proposals’, The Journal of Criminal Law 88(1): (2024), pp. 17–47.10.1177/00220183241229945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T. ‘Observers, Advisers, or Authorities? Experts, Juries and Criminal Responsibility in Historical Perspective’, The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 12(1): (2001), pp. 105–122.10.1080/09585180010028418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartofsky, M. ‘The Dialectics of Rationality: The Historicity of Norms in Psychiatry and the Law’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 3(3): (1980), pp. 279–293.10.1016/0160-2527(80)90008-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasik, M. ‘Partial Excuses in the Criminal Law’, Modern Law Review 45(5): (1982), pp. 516–533.10.1111/j.1468-2230.1982.tb02492.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G. ‘Two Faces of Responsibility’, Philosophical Topics 24(2): (1996), pp. 227–248.10.5840/philtopics199624222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, E. J. ‘Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law’, The Yale Law Journal 97(6): (1988), pp. 949–1016.10.2307/796339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, H. & Millings, M., ‘Scrutinising the Appeal of Volunteer Community Speedwatch to Policing Leaders in England and Wales: Resources, Responsivity and Responsibilisation’, Policing and Society 29(4): (2019), pp. 376–391.10.1080/10439463.2018.1515945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werkmäster, M. J. ‘Blame as a Sentiment’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 30(3): (2022), pp. 239–253.10.1080/09672559.2022.2121893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. A. & Milne, A., ‘Phenomenal Causality: Impressions of Pulling in the Visual Perception of Objects in Motion’, American Journal of Psychology 110(4): (1997), pp. 573–602.10.2307/1423411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whooley, O. ‘Nosological Reflections: The Failure of DSM-5, the Emergence of RDoC, and the Decontextualization of Mental Distress’, Society and Mental Health 4(2): (2014), pp. 92–110.10.1177/2156869313519114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. ‘Diminished Responsibility’, Medicine, Science and Law 339(1): (1960–1961), p. 41.10.1177/002580246100100105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. ‘Punishment: Consequentialism’, Philosophy Compass 5(6): (2010), pp. 455–469.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00287.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. ‘Retribution, Crime Reduction, and the Justification of Punishment’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22(2): (2002), pp. 301–321.10.1093/ojls/22.2.301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, K. ‘In Defence of Diminished Responsibility: Considering Diminished Responsibility in the New Zealand Context’, Auckland University Law Review 15: (2009), pp. 169–204.Google Scholar
Wootton, B. ‘Diminished Responsibility: A Layman’s View’, Law Quarterly Review 76: (1960), p. 224.Google Scholar
Wright, F. ‘Does New Zealand Need a Diminished Responsibility Defence?’, Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence 6(2): (1998), pp. 109–129.Google Scholar
Yeo, S. ‘The Role of Gender in the Law of Provocation’, Anglo-American Law Review 26: (1997), pp. 431–460.Google Scholar
Zedner, L. ‘Security, the State, and the Citizen: The Changing Architecture of Crime Control’, New Criminal Law Review 13(2): (2010), pp. 379–403.10.1525/nclr.2010.13.2.379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, L. & Moore, M., ‘Deontological Ethics’ in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/ethics-deontological/.Google Scholar
Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G., World Inequality Report (Paris: World Inequality Lab, 2018).10.4159/9780674984769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annison, H. & Guiney, T., ‘Locked In? Achieving Penal Change in the Context of Crisis and Scandal’, Prison Reform Trust Discussion Paper (2023).Google Scholar
Associated Press, ‘Father Is Cleared in Ill Baby’s Death’, New York Times (May 19, 1989).Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. & Travis, J., ‘The Power of Parsimony: Executive Session on the Future of Justice Policy’, Columbia University Justice Lab (2021), available at: https://squareonejustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/CJLJ8747-Square-One-Parsimony-Report-WEB-210524.pdf.Google Scholar
Blackstone, W. Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–1769), available at: https://lonang.com/library/reference/blackstone-commentaries-law-england/bla-003/10.1093/oseo/instance.00248899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom Cooper, L. ‘Social Control and Criminal Justice: An Unresponsive Alliance’, paper presented at the British Society of Criminology Conference (1995).Google Scholar
Brookbanks, W. ‘Diminished Responsibility: Balm or Bane’ in Legal Research Foundation, Movements and Markers in Criminal Policy (Pub. 23, 1984), pp. 29–39.Google Scholar
Caruso, G. ‘Skepticism About Moral Responsibility’ in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/skepticism-moral-responsibility/.Google Scholar
Chhana, R., Spier, P., Roberts, S., & Hurd, C., ‘The Sentencing Act 2002: Monitoring the First Year’, Ministry of Justice (2004), available at: www.employmentcourt.govt.nz/assets/sentencing-act-year-1.pdf.Google Scholar
Criminal Law Revision Committee, Cmnd. 7844, Fourteenth Report: Offences against the Person (London, 1980).Google Scholar
Dillon, R. S. ‘Respect’ in E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition), available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/respect/.Google Scholar
DurcanDr, G. Prison Mental Health Services in England, 2023: Prison & Young Offender Institution Mental Health Needs Analysis (Centre for Mental Health, 2023).Google Scholar
Eagleman, D. ‘The Brain on Trial’, The Atlantic (July/August 2011).Google Scholar
Fraser, N. ‘Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition and Participation,’ The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Delivered at Stanford University (30 April–2 May 1996), p. 9, available at: https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/f/Fraser98.pdf.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. ‘Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, Participation’, WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS I 98-108 (1998).Google Scholar
Griffith, S. ‘Alcoholic Given Life for “Grudge” Murder of Boxing Coach’, Irish Independent (28 March 2007).Google Scholar
Gur, R. C. Declaration of Ruben C. Gur., PhD, Patterson v. Texas. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to US Supreme Court, J. Gary Hart, Counsel, available at: www.abanet.org/crimjust/juvjus/patterson.html.Google Scholar
H.C. Public Bill Committee, Coroners and Justice Bill, Public Bill Committee Deb., H.C. 3 Mar. 2009, cc. 416.Google Scholar
Hoefer, C. ‘Causal Determinism’ in E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2016), available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/determinism-causal/.Google Scholar
Iser, M. ‘Recognition’ in E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/recognition/.Google Scholar
Kadish, S. ‘The Model Penal Code’s Provocation Proposal and Its Reception in the State Legislatures and Courts of the United States of America, with Comments Relating to the Partial Defenses of Diminished Responsibility and Imperfect Self-Defense’ in Partial Defences to Murder: Final Report, Law Com No. 290 (2004), Appendix F.Google Scholar
Kennefick, L. & Guilfoyle, E., An Evidence Review of Community Service Policy, Practice and Structure (Irish Probation Service, 2022).Google Scholar
Knijn, T. & Lepianka, D., Report Containing a Conceptual Framework for Integration of Findings (ETHOS, 2018), p. 13, available at: www.ethos-europe.eu/sites/default/files//docs/d7.1_website_report_complete.pdf.Google Scholar
Lacey, N. ‘Criminal Justice and Social (In)justice’, International Inequalities Institute Working Papers 84: (2022).Google Scholar
Law Commission, A New Homicide Act for England and Wales?, CP No. 177 (2005).Google Scholar
Law Commission, Criminal Liability: Insanity and Automatism, A Discussion Paper (2013).Google Scholar
Law Commission, Criminal Liability: Insanity and Automatism, A Scoping Paper (2012).Google Scholar
Law Commission, Final Report on Partial Defences to Murder, Law Com No. 195 (2004).Google Scholar
Law Commission, Partial Defences to Murder, Law Com No. 173 (2003).Google Scholar
Law Commission, Partial Defences to Murder, Law Com No. 290 (2004).Google Scholar
Law Commission, Report on Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide, Law Com No. 304 (2006).Google Scholar
Law Commission NZ, Understanding Family Violence: Reforming the Criminal Law relating to Homicide, Report 139 (2016).Google Scholar
Law Reform Commission, ‘Synopsis of Irish Law Relating to the Defence of Diminished Responsibility’ in Law Commission, Partial Defences to Murder – Overseas Studies, Appendices to Law Commission, Partial Defences to Murder, CP 173 (2003).Google Scholar
Lee, Y. The Criminal Jury, Moral Judgments, and Political Representation, 2018 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1255–1292, available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1942&context=faculty_scholarshipGoogle Scholar
Mackay, R. D. ‘The Diminished Responsibility Plea in Operation – An Empirical Study’, in Law Commission, Report on Partial Defences to Murder, LC 195 (2004), Appendix B.Google Scholar
McCartan, K. F. ‘Trauma-Informed Practice’, HM Inspectorate of Probation Academic Insights (2020).Google Scholar
McTaggart, A. ‘Considering New Zealand’s Lack of Partial Defences in Relation to Battered Women Who Kill Their Abusers’, Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 6/2020.10.2139/ssrn.3556196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Justice, Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide: Proposals for Reform of the Law, CP 19/08 (2008).Google Scholar
Monteith, KC, K., Quinn, E., Dennis, A. L., Joseph-Salisbury, R., Kane, E., Addo, F., & McGourlay, C., ‘Racial Bias and the Bench: A Response to the Judicial Diversity and Inclusion Strategy (2020–2025)’, University of Manchester (November 2022).Google Scholar
New Zealand Law Commission, The Partial Defence of Provocation, NZLC R98 (2007).Google Scholar
NSW Law Reform Commission, Partial Defences to Murder: Diminished Responsibility (Report 82, 1997), para. 3.11.Google Scholar
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, ‘Guidelines for Prosecutors’ (2019), available at: www.dppireland.ie/app/uploads/2021/01/Guidelines-for-Prosecutors-5th-Edition-eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Ramsay, P. ‘The Theory of Vulnerable Autonomy and the Legitimacy of the Civil Preventative Order’, LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers No. 1/2008 (2008).Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists, Child Defendants, OP 56 (March 2006).Google Scholar
Rt. Hon. Bruce Millan (Chairman), Report on the Review of the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984, SE/2001/56, ch. 29.Google Scholar
Scottish Law Commission, Discussion Paper on the Mental Element in Homicide, DP No. 172 (2021).Google Scholar
Scottish Law Commission, Report on Insanity and Diminished Responsibility, No 195 (2004).Google Scholar
Sentencing Council, ‘General Guideline: Overarching Principles’, Step 1(b), Sentencing Council Website (2019), available at: www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/overarching-guides/crown-court/item/general-guideline-overarching-principles/.Google Scholar
Sentencing Council, ‘Sentencing Guidelines: Manslaughter by Reason of Diminished Responsibility’, Sentencing Council Website (2018), available at: www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/crown-court/item/manslaughter-by-reason-of-diminished-responsibility/.Google Scholar
Shaw, A., Egan, J., & Gillespie, M., Drugs and Poverty: A Literature Review: A report produced by the Scottish Drugs Forum (SDF) on behalf of the Scottish Association of Alcohol and Drug Action Teams (Scotland, 2007).Google Scholar
Standing Committee for Youth Justice, Suggested Amendment for House of Commons Committee Stage (London, 2009).Google Scholar
The Law Commission of Western Australia, Final Report: Review of the Law of Homicide (2007).Google Scholar
Tong, R. & William, N., ‘Feminist Ethics’ in E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/feminism-ethics/.Google Scholar
van den Brink, B., Rippon, S., Theuns, T., & Zala, M., Report on the Workshop ‘Ideal and Non-Ideal Theories of Justice’: Towards a Non-Ideal Theory of Justice in Europe (ETHOS, 2018), available at: https://ethos-europe.eu/sites/default/files//docs/d2.2_loaded_website_version.pdf.Google Scholar
Victorian Law Reform Commission, Defences to Homicide, Report No. 94 (2004).Google Scholar
Victorian Law Reform Commission, Report on Defences to Homicide: Final Report (2004), para. 5.38.Google Scholar
Wade KC, C. Domestic Homicide Sentencing Review, CP 814 (March 2023).Google Scholar
Walen, A. ‘Retributive Justice’ in E. Zalta & U. Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 Edition), available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/justice-retributive/.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Louise Kennefick, University of Glasgow
  • Book: The Boundaries of Blame
  • Online publication: 26 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009386142.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Louise Kennefick, University of Glasgow
  • Book: The Boundaries of Blame
  • Online publication: 26 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009386142.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Louise Kennefick, University of Glasgow
  • Book: The Boundaries of Blame
  • Online publication: 26 July 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009386142.015
Available formats
×