Book contents
- Leadership in the Ancient World
- Antiquity in Global Context
- Leadership in the Ancient World
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Table
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Leadership in Third-Millennium Mesopotamia
- Chapter 2 Leadership in Rural Pharaonic Egypt
- Chapter 3 The Importance of Religion in Achaemenid Leadership
- Chapter 4 Leadership in Ancient China
- Chapter 5 Public Generosity and Models of Leadership in Classical Athens
- Chapter 6 Divine Kingship as Reflected in Deuterocanonical Literature
- Chapter 7 Cicero, Octavian and the Failure of Republican Leadership
- Chapter 8 Ciceronian Aspects of Leadership in Livy’s Ab Vrbe Condita
- Chapter 9 Imperial and Episcopal Leadership Networks in the Later Roman Empire
- Chapter 10 Concluding Remarks
- General Index
- References
Chapter 1 - Leadership in Third-Millennium Mesopotamia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 September 2025
Edited by
Book contents
- Leadership in the Ancient World
- Antiquity in Global Context
- Leadership in the Ancient World
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Table
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Leadership in Third-Millennium Mesopotamia
- Chapter 2 Leadership in Rural Pharaonic Egypt
- Chapter 3 The Importance of Religion in Achaemenid Leadership
- Chapter 4 Leadership in Ancient China
- Chapter 5 Public Generosity and Models of Leadership in Classical Athens
- Chapter 6 Divine Kingship as Reflected in Deuterocanonical Literature
- Chapter 7 Cicero, Octavian and the Failure of Republican Leadership
- Chapter 8 Ciceronian Aspects of Leadership in Livy’s Ab Vrbe Condita
- Chapter 9 Imperial and Episcopal Leadership Networks in the Later Roman Empire
- Chapter 10 Concluding Remarks
- General Index
- References
Summary
The concept of leadership has not received much attention in Assyriology as it was overshadowed by the concept of kingship and its omnipresence in ancient Mesopotamia. As the available sources mostly are written from the perspective of the leader – in the case of ancient Mesopotamia this is the king or the city ruler – also Assyriologists mostly took this standpoint and wrote ‘history from above’. Much scholarly effort was invested in the study of various aspects of kingship. Because of the scarceness of sources discussing the experience of the ruler’s leadership and the abundance of royal inscriptions, we usually do not take the perspective – to use a widespread political metaphor – of the sheep, but only that of the shepherd. Nevertheless, there are some texts that critic the leadership of kings. These texts are mostly of literary nature but they allow us at least a partial ‘view from below’, as they describe the problems of people living under a powerful king.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Leadership in the Ancient WorldConcepts, Models, Theories, pp. 14 - 33Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Alster, B. (1997) Proverbs of Ancient Sumer: The World’s Earliest Proverb Collections, 2 volumes (Bethesda: LDC Press).Google Scholar
Anthonioz, S. (2020) ‘The Lion, the Shepherd, and the Master of Animals: Metaphorical Interactions and Governance Representations in Mesopotamian and Levantine Sources’, in Pallavidini, M. and Portuese, L. (eds.) Researching Metaphor in the Ancient Near East, Philippika 141 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barjamovic, G. (2004) ‘Civic Institutions and Self-Government in Southern Mesopotamia in the Mid-First Millennium bc’, in Dercksen, J. G. (ed.) Assyria and Beyond: Studies Presented to Mogens Trolle Larsen (Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten), 47–98.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. E. (1988) The Canonical Lamentation of Ancient Mesopotamia, 2 volumes (Potomac: CDL Press).Google Scholar
Cooper, J. S. (1983) Reconstructing History from Ancient Inscriptions: The Lagash-Umma Border Conflict (Malibu: Undena Publications).Google Scholar
Di Ludovico, A. (2014) ‘The Reign of Šulgi: Investigation of a King above Suspicion’, in Neumann, H., Dittmann, R., Paulus, S., Neumann, G. and Schuster-Brandis, A. (eds.) Krieg und Frieden im Alten Vorderasien (52e Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale) (Münster: Ugarit Verlag), 481–93.Google Scholar
Fink, S. (2016) ‘Battle and War in the Royal Self-Representation of the Ur III Period’, in Kämmerer, T. R., Kõiv, M. and Sazonov, V. (eds.) Kings, Gods and People: Establishing Monarchies in the Ancient World (Münster: Ugarit Verlag), 109–34.Google Scholar
Fink, S. (2020a) ‘Invisible Mesopotamian Royal Women?’, in Carney, E. and Müller, S. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Women and Monarchy in the Ancient Mediterranean World (London: Routledge), 137–48.Google Scholar
Fink, S. (2020b) ‘Criticizing the King in Ancient Mesopotamia: An Overview’, in Horst, C. (ed.) Der Alte Orient und die Entstehung der Athenischen Demokratie, Classica et Orientalia 21 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), 11–36.Google Scholar
Fink, S. (2021) ‘Vom Mittelmeer bis zum Indus: Raum, Geschwindigkeit und die Imperien Mesopotamiens’, Geographia Antiqua 30, 121–31.Google Scholar
Fink, S. and Sazonov, V. (2019) ‘Complex Genealogies in Mesopotamia: From Mesilim to Tukultī-Ninurta’, Studia Antiqua et Archaelolgica 25(2), 231–48.Google Scholar
Fleming, D. (2004) Democracy’s Ancient Ancestors (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, B. R (2014) ‘Wool in the Economy of Sargonic Mesopotamia’, in Breniquet, C. and Michel, C. (eds.) Wool Economy in the Ancient Near East and the Aegean (Ancient Textiles Series 17) (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 115–23.Google Scholar
Frayne, D. (1993) Sargonic and Gutian Periods (2334–2113 bc): The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia Early Periods, vol. 2 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frayne, D. (1997a) Presargonic Period (2700–2350): The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia Early Periods, vol. 1 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
Frayne, D. (1997b) Ur III Period (2112–2004 bc): The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia Early Periods, vol. 3.2 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, A. (2008) ‘Über den Wert von Befestigungsanlagen’, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 98, 45–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbay, U. (2014) Pacifying the Hearts of the Gods: Sumerian Emesal Prayers of the First Millennium bc, Heidelberger Emesal Studien 1 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz).Google Scholar
Gabriel, G. (2020) ‘Die älteste Version der Chronik der einzigen Monarchie’, in Janowski, B. and Schwemer, D. (eds.) Texte aus der Umwelt des Alten Testaments, Neue Folge 9 (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus), 54–62.Google Scholar
Glassner, J. J. (2004) Mesoptamian Chronicles (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature).Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T, (1943) ‘Primitive Democracy in Ancient Mesopotamia’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 2, 159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johandi, A. (2015) ‘Public Speaking in Ancient Mesopotamia: Speeches before Earthly and Divine Battles’, in Espak, P., Läänemets, M. and Sazonov, V. (eds.) When Gods Spoke: Researches and Reflections on Religious Phenomena and Artefacts, Studia in Honorem Tarmo Kulmar (Tartu: Studia Orientalia Tartuensia, Tartu University Press), 71–106.Google Scholar
Keetman, J. (2007) ‘König Gilgamesch reitet auf seinen Untertanen. Gilgamesch, Enkidu und die Unterwelt politisch gelesen’, Bibliotheca Orientalis 64, 5–31.10.2143/BIOR.64.1.2021779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keetman, J. (2008) ‘Der Kampf im Haustor. Eine der Schlüsselszenen zum Verständnis des Gilgameš-Epos’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 67, 161–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, B. (2009) ‘The Army of the Kings of Ur: The Textual Evidence’, Cuneiform Digital Library Journal 5, 1–25 (http://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2009/cdlj2009_005.html).Google Scholar
Liverani, M. (ed.) (1993) Akkad, the First World Empire: Structure, Ideology, Traditions, History of the Ancient Near East, Studies V (Padua: Sargon).Google Scholar
Liverani, M. (2006) Uruk: The First City, ed. and trans. by Bahrani, Z. and Van De Mieroop, M. (London: Equinox).10.1558/isbn.9781845534875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maul, S. (1988) ‘Herzberuhigungsklagen’, die sumerisch-akkadischen Eršaḫunga-Gebete (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz).Google Scholar
Maul, S. (2013) Die Wahrsagekunst im Alten Orient. Zeichen des Himmels und der Erde (Munich: C. H. Beck).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalowski, P. (2008) ‘The Mortal Kings of Ur: A Short Century of Divine Rule in Ancient Mesopotamia’, in Briesch, N. (ed.) Religion and Power: Divine Kinship in the Ancient World and Beyond, Oriental Institute Seminars 4 (Chicago: Oriental Institute), 33–45.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P. (2010) ‘Masters of the Four Corners of the Heavens: Views of the Universe in Early Mesopotamian Writings’, in Raaflaub, K. and Talbert, R. J. A. (eds.) Geography and Ethnography, The Ancient World: Comparative Histories (Malden: Wiley Blackwell), 147–68.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P. (2013) ‘Of Bears and Men: Thoughts about the End of Šulgi’s Reign and the Ensuing Succession’, in Vanderhooft, D. S. and Winitzer, A. (eds) Literature as Politics, Politics as Literature Essays on the Ancient Near East in Honor of Peter Machinist (Ann Arbor: Eisenbrauns), 285–319.Google Scholar
Nissinen, M. (2019) Ancient Prophecy: Near Eastern, Biblical and Greek Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Sallaberger, W. (1999) ‘Ur III Zeit’, in Sallaberger, W. and Westenholz, A. (eds.) Mesopotamien. Akkade-Zeit und Ur III-Zeit, Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 160 (Freiburg: Universitätsverlag Freiburg), 121–390.Google Scholar
Selz, G. (2010) ‘“The Poor are the Silent Ones in The Country”: On the Loss of Legitimacy; Challenging Power in Early Mesopotamia’, in Charvát, P. and Vlčková, P. M. (eds.) Who Was King? Who Was Not King? (Prague: Institute of Archaeology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic), 1–15.Google Scholar
Selz, G. (2012) ‘Stadtgott’, Reallexikon der Assyriologie und vorderasiatischen Archäologie 13, 75–8.Google Scholar
Selz, G. (2018) ‘Intimate Relations: Reconsidering Background of the Mesopotamian Mistress of the Animals’, in Kaniuth, K., Lau, D. and Wilcke, D. (eds.) Übergangszeiten. Altorientalische Studien für Reinhard Dittmann anlässlich seines 65. Geburtstags (Münster: Zaphon), 143–51.Google Scholar
Selz, G. (2020) ‘The Uruk Phenomenon’, in Radner, K., Moeller, N. and Potts, D. T. (eds.) The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East: From the Beginnings to Old Kingdom Egypt and the Dynasty of Akkad, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 163–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, G. (1999) Rethinking World-Systems: Diaspora, Colonies, and Interaction in Uruk Mesopotamia (Tucson: The University of Arizona Press).Google Scholar
Steinkeller, P. (2013) ‘An Archaic “Prisoner Plaque” from Kiš’, Revue d’assyriologie et d’archéologie orientale 107, 131–57.Google Scholar
Winter, I. (1996) ‘Sex, Rhetoric, and the Public Monument: The Alluring Body of Naram-Sin of Agade’, in Kampen, N. and Bergmann, B. A. (eds.) Sexuality in Ancient Art: Near East, Egypt, Greece, and Italy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 11–26.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
The PDF of this book
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.