Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-xh45t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T06:00:06.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards Urban Alter-Politics: Scholar-Activists Situated Solidarities in Philippine Housing Struggles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2025

Chester Antonino Cunan Arcilla*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines Department of Sociology and Centre for Asian Studies in Africa, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

In this paper, I marked the critical alter-political works of urban scholar-activists in the Philippines. Slums are at the heart of capitalist dispossessions. Slumdwellers live, survive, negotiate, and resist on an everyday basis. In the Philippines, the struggles of slum community organisations are strongly influenced, formed, and pulled in divergent ideological trajectories by contending larger political formations.

I draw on my own experience and that of 20 Filipino urban scholar-activists with varied political commitments, reflecting on decades of community work, to highlight the alter-works and challenges of navigating the web of political heterogeneity within urban poor organisations and movements. By scholar-activists, I do not refer solely to those who are based in universities, but to the many who struggle every day to unearth subaltern political knowledges and collectively fight for the right to adequate housing, as well as, for some, the right to the city. I enumerate the multiple functions and necessary labours of being 'embedded' in these complex politics. We engage in political advising, framing, networking, organizing, translating, and capacity-building. Caught in a complex web that may necessitate strategic essentialisation, silencing, and foreclosures, scholar-activists play a crucial role of strategic facilitation that connects collective forms of living among urban surplus lives and corrodes neoliberal urban dispossessions. These alter-works are continuous efforts towards situated solidarities, where urban scholar activists critically draw from and reshape ‘inherited’ social movement frames and strategies grounded on actually existing subaltern realities, capacities, and political opportunities.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Institute for East Asian Studies.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Appadurai, Arjun. 2001. “Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics.” Environment & Urbanization 13(2): 23-44.10.1177/095624780101300203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcilla, Chester. 2018. “Producing empty socialized housing: Privatizing gains, socializing costs, and dispossessing the Filipino Poor.” Social Transformations: Journal of the Global South 6(1): 77-105.Google Scholar
Arcilla, Chester. 2019. “Ethics and personal politics in the engaged ethnography of urban subalternity.” Agham Tao 27(1): 57-87.Google Scholar
Arcilla, Chester. 2023. “Disrupting gentrification: From barricades and housing occupations to an insurgent urban subaltern history in a southern city.” Antipode. doi 10.1111/anti.12827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballesteros, Marife. 2010. “Linking poverty and the environment: Evidence from slums in Philippine cities.” Philippine Institute for Development Studies Discussion Paper 33.Google Scholar
Bayat, Asef. 2000. “From 'dangerous classes' to 'quiet rebels': Politics of the urban subaltern in the Global South.” International Sociology 15: 533-557.10.1177/026858000015003005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, Becky, and Exley, Zack. 2016. Rules for Revolutionaries: How Big Organizing Can Change Everything. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Borras, Saturnino, and Franco, Jennifer. 2023. Scholar-activism and Land Struggles. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.Google Scholar
Božić-Vrbančić, Senka. 2020. “An interview with Ghassan Hage.” Etnološka Tribina 43(50): 238-244.Google Scholar
Cardenas, Kenneth. 2020. “The mobility-oligopoly nexus in Philippine property development.” In Mobilities of Transport and Labor in Asia, edited by Aulakh, Preet and Kelly, Philip, 233-261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Casas-Cortes, Maribel, Michal, Osterweil, and Powell, Dana. 2013. “Transformations in engaged ethnography: Knowledge, networks, and social movements.” In Insurgent Encounters: Transnational Activism, Ethnography, and the Political, edited by Jeffrey, S. Juris and Khasnabish, Alex, 199-229. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822395867-009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, Rosa Cordillera. 2015. “The emotional, political, and analytical labor of engaged anthropology amidst violent political conflict.” Medical Anthropology 34(1): 70-83.10.1080/01459740.2014.960564CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choplin, Armelle, and Ciavolella, Riccardo. 2017. “Gramsci and the African Città Futura: Urban subaltern politics from the margins of Nouakchott, Mauritania.” Antipode 49(2): 314-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciavolella, Riccardo, and Boni, Stefano. 2015. “Aspiring to alterpolitics. Anthropology, radical theory, and social movements.” Focaal - Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 72: 3-8.Google Scholar
Coles, Romand. 2016. Visionary Pragmatism: Radical and Ecological Democracy in Neoliberal Times. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2009. “Regimes, repertoires and state repression.” Swiss Political Science Review 15(2): 377385.10.1002/j.1662-6370.2009.tb00138.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, Manisha, 2013. “The possibilities and perils for scholar-activists and activist-scholars: Reflections on the feminist dialogues.” In Insurgent Encounters: Transnational Activism, Ethnography, and the Political, edited by Jeffrey, S. Juris, and Khasnabish, Alex, 89-107. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822395867-004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, Matthew. 2012. “Eviction and the reproduction of urban poverty.” American Journal of Sociology 118(1): 88-133.10.1086/666082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dizon, Hazel. 2019. “Philippine housing takeover: How the urban poor claimed their right to shelter.” Radical Housing Journal 1(1): 105-129.10.54825/LDXD9655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovey, Kim, and Recio, Redento. 2024. “Inventraset assemblages: The spatial logic of informal street vending, transport and settlement.” Urban Studies. doi: 10.1177/00420980231223060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fields, Desiree, Power, Emma, and Card, Kenton. 2023. “Housing movements and care: Rethinking the political imaginaries of housing.” Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.13012.Google Scholar
Frøystad, Kathinka. 2016. “Alter-politics reconsidered: From different worlds to osmotic worlding.” In Critical Anthropological Engagements in Human Alterity and Difference, edited by Bertelsen, Enge and Bendixsen, Synnøve, 229-252. doi 10.1007/978-3-319-40475-2_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullilove, Mindy Thompson. 2021. “Thoughts on ‘scholar*activist.’Radical Housing Journal 3(1): 287-290.10.54825/LMVC3096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrido, Marco. 2008. “Civil and uncivil society: Symbolic boundaries and civic exclusion in Metro Manila.” Philippine Studies 56(4): 443465.Google Scholar
Hage, Ghassan. 2012. “Critical anthropological thought and the radical political imaginary today.” Critique of Anthropology 32(3): 285-308.10.1177/0308275X12449105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hage, Ghassan. 2015. Alter-Politics: Critical Anthropology and the Radical Imagination. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. 2017. Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Herrin, Alejandro. 1982. “Philippine demographic development: Problems and prospects.” Philippine Economic Review 19(1&2): 175-197.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Dorothy. 2011. Being Maasai, Becoming Indigenous: Postcolonial Politics in a Neoliberal World. Indiana: Indiana University Press.10.2979/6125.0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaos, Anna Marie. 1993. “Manila's squatter movement: A struggle for place and identity.” Philippine Sociological Review 41(1/4): 71-91.Google Scholar
Karaos, Anna Marie. 1998. “Fragmentations in the urban movement: Shift from resistance to policy advocacy.” Philippine Sociological Review 46(3/4): 143-157.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict. 1996. “Contemporary Philippine left politics in historical perspective.” In The Revolution Falters: The Left in Philippine Politics after 1986, edited by Abinales, Patricio, 9-27. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501719028.Google Scholar
Khasnabish, Alex, and Haiven, Max. 2012. “Convoking the radical imagination: Social movement research, dialogic methodologies, and scholarly vocations.” Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 12(5): 408-421.10.1177/1532708612453126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kioupkiolis, Alexandros. 2023. “Counter-hegemonic leadership for democratic alter-politics in our times.” Politics 43(4): 489-504.10.1177/02633957211063428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusaka, Wataru. 2017. Moral Politics in the Philippines: Inequality, Democracy and the Urban Poor. Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
Lacaba, Pete. 1982. Days of Disquiet, Nights of Rage. Quezon City: Rapid Lithographic.Google Scholar
Lancione, Michele. 2023. “Radical housing justice within and beyond caring.” Antipode 56(3): 841-846.10.1111/anti.12958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larner, Wendy. 1995. “Theorising 'difference' in Aotearoa/New Zealand {1}.” Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 2(2): 177-190.10.1080/09663699550022008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynd, Staughton, and Grubačić, Andrej. 2008. Wobblies and Zapatistas: Conversations on Anarchism, Marxism, and Radical History. New York: PM Press.Google Scholar
Nagar, Richa, and Geiger, Susan. 2007. “Reflexivity and positionality in feminist fieldwork revisited.” In Politics and Practice in Economic Geography, edited by Tickell, Adam, Peck, Jamie, and Sheppard, Eric, 267-278. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd.10.4135/9781446212240.n23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Gritt, and Jorgensen, Nanna. 2018. “Engagement beyond critique? Anthropological perspective on participation and community.” Conjunctions: Transdisciplinary Journal of Cultural Participation 5(1): 5-13.10.7146/tjcp.v5i1.105289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Arnisson. 2016. Neoliberalizing Spaces in the Philippines: Suburbanization, Transnational Migration, and Dispossession. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Osterweil, M. 2016. “Collaboration: Translation.” Correspondences, Cultural Anthropology 2 October. Available at https://culanth.org/fieldsights/963-collaboration-translation. (accessed 20 May 2022).Google Scholar
Pande, Raksha. 2017. “Strategic essentialism.” In The International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment, and Technology, edited by Richardson, Douglas, Castree, Noel, Goodchild, Micheal, Kobayashi, Audrey, Liu, Weidong, Marston, Richard, 1-5. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Portelli, Stefano, and Tschoepe, Aylin. 2021. “On Activist scholarship.” Radical Housing Journal 3(1): 251-259.10.54825/YCGB5574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putzel, James. 1992. A Captive Land: The Politics of Agrarian Reform in the Philippines. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
Putzel, James. 1995. “Managing the ‘main force’: The communist party and the peasantry in the Philippines.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 22(4): 645-671.10.1080/03066159508438591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Alejandra, Vilenica, Ana, McElroy, Erin, Chen, Hung-Ying, Lancione, Michele, Thompson, Samantha, and Muñoz, Solange. 2021. “Editorial: Tenant organizing, scholar activism, and global south perspectives as alternative infrastructures of knowledge production.” Radical Housing Journal 3(1): 1-10.10.54825/EWCU1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocamora, Joel. 1994. Breaking through: The Struggle within the Communist Party of the Philippines. Metro Manila: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar
Routledge, Paul, and Kate, Driscoll Derickson. 2015. “Situated solidarities and the practice of scholar-activism.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33(3): 391-407.10.1177/0263775815594308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2006. The Rise of the Global Left. London: Zed Books.10.5040/9781350223516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Benedikt, and Smith, Thomas. 2021. “Social transformation and postcapitalist possibility: Emerging dialogues between practice theory and diverse economies.” Progress in Human Geography 45(2): 253275.10.1177/0309132520905642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Ian G.R., and Waterstone, Marv. 2021. “A planet of surplus life: Building worlds beyond capitalism.” Antipode 53(6): 1787-1806.10.1111/anti.12741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simone, AbdouMaliq. 2022. The Surrounds: Urban Life Within and Beyond Capture. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Speed, Shannon. 2006. “At the crossroads of human rights and anthropology: Toward a critically engaged activist research.” American Anthropologist 108(1): 66-76.10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Mark. 2020. “Pushback after backsliding? Unconstrained executive aggrandizement in the Philippines versus contested military-monarchial rule in Thailand.” Democratization. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1835860.Google Scholar
UN-Habitat Philippines. 2023. Philippines Country Report. Manila: UN-Habitat Philippines.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2024. Urban Population Philippines. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL?locations=PHGoogle Scholar