To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The struggle of how to manage the solid waste produced in cities every day reflects much about the ways in which a city is administered and the extent to which it embraces the requirements of urban environmental sustainability. While often not as environmentally pressing as water access, disease, and extreme event hazards, for the past several decades urban solid waste management has been regularly described as a global crisis. Lack of strategies to effectively and safely handle solid waste, shortage of appropriate waste management sites and facilities, and absence of sufficient financing for these operations have severely hampered the ability of cities to address this crisis. The chapter examines a set of four cases detailing how and when, and under what circumstances did significant policy transition occur, and the extent to which these resulted in transformative shifts in city-level solid waste management. The cases include Buenos Aires, Argentina; Johannesburg, South Africa; Seattle, US; and Taipei, Taiwan. Solid waste management crises were present in each locale and were experienced as a set of policy proposals and failures before longer-term structural policy regime shifts are defined. Across all the cases, these solid waste management policy shifts were directly associated with an emergent reimagining of each city’s identity.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.