To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The Electoral College can misfire, electing a president who loses the popular vote (as in 2000 and 2016), but the presidential nomination process can misfire as well, producing a nominee (as in 1952 or, more recently, 2016) who is less popular among party voters than other candidates in the party. The cause of this is the byzantine web of state laws and party rules governing the process. This book explores those rules, enabling us to make sense of the process and understand how presidential candidates have been selected throughout American history. Surprisingly, for much of American history, the major party’s nominees were chosen by party leaders, not ordinary voters, and even today, the process is far less democratic than many imagine. Not every voter is able to participate in the process, and not every vote is weighted equally. This book examines the evolution of the rules governing the nomination process and how those rules contribute to the increasing ideological polarization of our politics today.
Who Nominates? is an accessible and non-partisan examination of the presidential nomination process, untangling the byzantine web of legal rules that govern modern nomination procedures in both major political parties. Beginning with the Constitutional Convention of 1787, noted constitutional law scholar Norman R. Williams traces the evolution of party rules and state laws regarding which individuals are entrusted with the power to choose the parties' presidential nominees. Only in the 1970s were ordinary voters fully included in the process, and even today, the rules governing nominations exclude or devalue a large number of voters. Williams' analysis provides context for modern debates about the role and influence of party elites, such as the Democrats' “superdelegates,” and examines how the rules governing the process today contribute to the increasingly divisive ideological polarization of presidential contests.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.