This paper serves as a template for, and argument to, the engineering design research community to pre-register research studies. Pre-registering allows for a research plan to be validated and results published, no matter the findings. To support pre-registering, we propose a case study to study how individual perspectives and decision-making processes interact as design teams collaborate and reach consensus. We explore how narrative misalignments within a design team—disagreements on the best path forward—are shaped by individual perspectives. Driving requirements, requirements that reflect a designer's prime motivations, are used to shed light on individual priorities. A data collection and analysis plan are introduced to explain how the team will examine how consensus was achieved, which divergent personal interests persist, and how future decision-scenarios might be influenced.
