To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Hypothalamic hamartomas (HHs) are a known cause of refractory focal epilepsy. Advancement in microsurgical techniques and introduction of stereotactic ablative methods have led to improved complication rates, but the effect on seizure control is still to be determined. In this systematic review, we present a thorough analysis of published literature on the outcomes of various surgical treatments of HHs for refractory epilepsy.
Methods:
A literature search using the MedLine, SCOPUS and Cochrane databases was conducted. All English language studies describing surgical treatment of HH with refractory epilepsy, with a minimum of three patients and a follow-up of at least one year, were identified.
Results:
An initial selection of 55 studies was reduced to 41 after combining studies from the same groups; 14 open, 4 endoscopic, 8 Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS), 9 laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and 6 radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF-TC) studies were included. From a total of 832 patients, 209 underwent open (25.1%), 80 endoscopic (9.6%), 124 GKRS (14.9%), 229 LITT (27.5%) and 190 RF-TC (22.8%). Engel I or ILAE 1 or 2 was achieved in: open 115 (55.0%), endoscopic 38 (47.5%), GKRS 49 (39.5%), LITT 176 (76.9%) and RF-TC 128 (67.4%). Invasive surgeries (open and endoscopic) had a higher incidence of neurological complications (27.0%) than ablative surgeries (GKRS, LITT, RF-TC) (7.2%). Reoperation rates were higher for ablative surgeries (23.8%) than invasive surgeries (9.0%).
Conclusion:
Surgical treatment of HH causing refractory epilepsy is effective. RF-TC and LITT surgery types have the highest Engel class I outcomes, and ablative surgeries have a lower neurological complication profile compared to open and endoscopic approaches.
Compared to surgery, LITT provides minimal disruption of the brain matter, less post-operative pain and shorter length of stay. LITT has enabled a more minimalist approach to deep-seated targets such as the insula. Increasing utilization of stereoelectroencephalography has allowed for better identification of seizure onset involving the insular cortex and subsequent ablation, including many patients with prior surgeries involving the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes. The insula serves as an ideal target for LITT, given the deep location and surrounding anatomic structures. There are limited studies on the efficacy of LITT in adults with lesional or non-lesional insular epilepsy. Retrospective LITT studies as well as comparisons with open surgical resection in the pediatric population have, however, shown good comparative efficacy while also demonstrating minimal, often transient, post-operative complications.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.