To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The evolutionary perspective has influenced many subfields of psychology and related social sciences in the last three decades. However, developmental psychology has remained largely immune to evolutionary thinking. What does evolutionary thinking have to offer developmental psychology and the study of child development? This book invites some of the leading figures in evolutionary developmental psychology to discuss cutting-edge research and its significance in related fields. By laying out the utility and importance of evolutionary thinking in developmental science, each chapter shows how the evolutionary perspective both opens new avenues of research by posing novel questions and providing insightful answers to age-old questions and debates. In the process, their overviews pay particular attention to the theoretical and empirical contributions of Jay Belsky, a pioneering developmental psychologist who has paved the way forward for the field. A short tribute and biography follow the chapters to pay homage to his work.
This commentary reflects on Jang and Choi’s (this volume) chapter summarizing the extent work on behavior and molecular genetic studies of personality disorder (PD). The authors argue that more work needs to be done on refining the PD phenotype, as most work in genetics to date has utilized categorical definitions of PD, even though clinical psychology generally and the field of PDs specifically is moving resolutely toward a dimensional conceptualization (as represented in the alternative model of PDs in the DSM-5). They also argue that the real benefit of both quantitative and measured gene approaches to studying PDs might not be the elucidation of more precise heritability estimates or even the identification of specific genes, but the contribution of environmental influences to maladaptive personality traits.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.