There is an urgent need to improve early accessibility to psychoeducational interventions for informal caregivers of individuals with eating disorders (EDs). We adapted the BREF programme, a short, single-family, psycho-educational intervention originally developed for caregivers in severe mental disorders, to EDs (BREF-ED) and assessed at diagnosis announcement. We hypothesised that it has a good acceptability and effectiveness in reducing short-term caregivers’ self-reported levels of burden and depressive symptoms.

Data of caregivers who participated in the BREF-ED programme were analysed. Adherence, satisfaction, and perceived usefulness were evaluated. Changes in self-reported burden and depression symptoms were measured pre-, post-, and 3 months after the intervention using the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and Center for Epidemiological Studies – Depression scale (CES-D).

Of the 53 caregivers included in the study, 52 participants completed the BREF-ED programme. As compared to baseline, ZBI scores showed a significant reduction after the intervention (Cohen’s d = 0.61, p < 0.001), and at the 3-month assessment (Cohen’s d = 0.62, p < 0.001). The CES-D scores also significantly decreased by the end of the third session (Cohen’s d = 0.83, p < 0.001) and at the 3-month follow-up (Cohen’s d = 0.77, p < 0.001). Satisfaction scores were high, with 90.1% of participants reporting being “very satisfied” and 9.9% “satisfied.”

Preliminary findings demonstrated high adherence rates, caregiver satisfaction, and a positive impact on burden and related depressive symptoms immediately after the programme and at short-term follow-up. This time- and resource-efficient programme has the potential for easy dissemination.

Although its effect has not been verified, family therapy – such as family psychoeducation (FPE) – is a widely used intervention for treating major depressive disorder (MDD). To our knowledge, no systematic review and meta-analysis exists that examines the effect of FPE on MDD.

To assess evidence on the effectiveness of FPE on depressive symptoms in people with MDD.

We searched several databases – including PubMed, MEDLINE and Web of Science, among others – to identify eligible studies on the topic published up to March 2022. Our criteria included studies on participants with a primary MDD diagnosis and their family members and excluded studies on people with bipolar disorders and other mental illnesses. In the included studies, family members in the control groups did not receive FPE. Participants in both the intervention and control groups received standard treatment. Two researchers independently selected relevant publications, extracted data and evaluated methodological quality using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and GRADE evaluation. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (no. CRD42020185884).

The meta-analysis included five studies with 301 patients with MDD and their family members. The effect of FPE on patients’ symptom severity, compared with the control condition, at 16 weeks was available for five comparisons of four randomised control trials (RCTs); a final follow-up was available for six comparisons of five RCTs. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant improvement in patients’ symptoms, compared with control, at 16 weeks (s.m.d. = −0.52, 95% CI −1.03 to −0.01) and at a final follow-up (s.m.d. = −0.53, 95% CI −0.98 to −0.08). The meta-analysis on the effect of FPE on family functioning showed a non-significant improvement both at 16 weeks and at final follow-up.

FPE had a small but statistically significant effect on depressive symptoms in people with MDD, in both the short and long term. However, according to the GRADE framework, all outcomes are graded very low on certainty; therefore, more high-quality research is needed.

Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is an evidence-based treatment program for people with severe mental illness developed in high-income countries. We report the first randomized controlled trial of ACT in mainland China.

Sixty outpatients with schizophrenia with severe functional impairments or frequent hospitalizations were randomly assigned to ACT (n = 30) or standard community treatment (n = 30). The severity of symptoms and level of social functioning were assessed at baseline and every 3 months during the 1-year study. The primary outcome was the duration of hospital readmission. Secondary outcomes included a pre-post change in symptom severity, the rates of symptom relapse and gainful employment, social and occupational functioning, and quality of life of family caregivers.

Based on a modified intention-to-treat analysis, the outcomes for ACT were significantly better than those of standard community treatment. ACT patients were less likely to be readmitted [3.3% (1/30) v. 25.0% (7/28), Fisher's exact test p = 0.023], had a shorter mean readmission time [2.4 (13.3) v. 30.7 (66.9) days], were less likely to relapse [6.7% (2/30) v. 28.6% (8/28), Fisher's exact test p = 0.038], and had shorter mean time in relapse [3.5 (14.6) v. 34.4 (70.6) days]. The ACT group also had significantly longer times re-employed and greater symptomatic improvement and their caregivers experienced a greater improvement in their quality of life.

Our results show that culturally adapted ACT is both feasible and effective for individuals with severe schizophrenia in urban China. Replication studies with larger samples and longer duration of follow up are warranted.