To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To cognitively test questions for inclusion in a national nutrition survey, ensuring the questions are interpreted as intended and to inform further improvements.
Design:
A draft nutrition survey questionnaire was developed based on existing questionnaires and expert input. Twelve questions on dietary habits and food security were selected for cognitive testing as these were newly developed, amended from existing questions, or identified to no longer reflect the current food environment or concepts. Cognitive interviews were conducted using both think-aloud and probing techniques to capture respondents’ thought processes used to arrive at an answer. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative data were analysed for recurring patterns and unique discoveries across the survey questions.
Setting:
New Zealand.
Participants:
Sixty-eight participants aged 11 years and older representing diverse socio-demographics including gender, ethnicity, and education level.
Results:
Three main cognitive challenges were identified: 1) interpreting ambiguous terms, 2) understanding of dietary or technical terms, and 3) following complex or unclear instructions. Questions were refined based on the study findings and further advice from experts in nutrition and survey design to enhance participant understanding and accuracy.
Conclusion:
The cognitive testing findings and expert input led to the refinement and potential improvement of selected questions for inclusion in a national nutrition survey. Changes included simplified terminology, clearer instructions, improved examples, and better question order. Our methodological approach and findings may be valuable for those designing similar questions for dietary surveys.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.