To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Few breast cancer radiotherapy studies include either patients with a hearing impairment or non-English speakers. Literature about healthcare and cancer care in general provided insights into reports by patients of disparities. Given technological advancements, it is reasonable to believe communication barriers should be surmountable, prompting a survey of radiotherapy departments to assess the status quo.
Methods:
A survey was conducted of all UK National Health Service (NHS) radiotherapy departments in England. A questionnaire was designed to determine if a deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique was used for breast cancer radiotherapy, the equipment that was used and whether patients with a hearing impairment or other language barriers received the same treatment.
Results:
A total of 22 radiotherapy departments responded to the survey. All respondents reported using DIBH as a heart-sparing technique; 100% (n = 22) reported offering DIBH to non-English speakers and 73% (n = 16) DIBH to patients with a hearing impairment. 45% (n = 10) stated that they use verbal instruction only, and 23% (n = 5) a combination of both verbal and visual aids and references.
Conclusion:
The study highlights some novel efforts in radiotherapy departments to increase equitable access to DIBH; however, the results indicate that verbal communication methods still dominate practice, and these are not inclusive of all hearing-impaired patients. Such methods would also require translation for non-English speakers. The study suggests that more work needs to be done before equitable access is achieved for patients with a hearing impairment or other language barrier.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.