To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter distinguishes different manners through which individuals and collective entities engage in reprehensible behavior and, on that basis, identifies two general contexts of wrongdoing: (1) a one-on-one context involving tortious situations where one individual directs her conduct toward another specific individual and (2) a collective context, which refers to tortious situations arising from impersonal market transactions between consumers and corporations. Each context of wrongdoing provides a framework from which distinctive understandings of punitive damages can be explored, one where the retributive reaction seeks to address invasions of dignitary interests and another for cases in which the retributive reaction responds to violations of societal trust. Ultimately, the chapter argues that any informed conversation on the place of retribution in the mass-market context requires improved understandings of the relevant markers for reprehensible behavior in that context (particularly the problem of asymmetry of information between manufacturers and consumers) and the correlative retributive motivations of consumers elicited in those wrongful situations.
There are two major paradigms of the market: the neoclassical static equilibrium theory and the Austrian School (and Schumpeterian) dynamic non-equilibrium theory. The most important difference between the two is their different understandings of the entrepreneur’s status and function in the market. The market in neoclassical economics is a market without entrepreneurs. On the contrary, entrepreneurs are central to the market in Austrian School economics and Schumpeterian economics. The neoclassical model is not a good market theory and its market failure theory is wrong. By placing entrepreneurs at the center of the market, the Austrian School of economics provides a better understanding of the market. This chapter also points out the eight paradoxes of the neoclassical model. These eight paradoxes show that neoclassical economics totally distorts our understanding of the real market.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.