We review 1982–1984 articles identifying Superfund sites in three nationalnewspapers. Articles almost never identify the race of nearby residents. Basedon sites receiving disproportionate coverage, readers might conclude thatSuperfund generally affected white, working-class families, but results do notsupport this narrative. In a pooled sample, neither race nor income predicts thenumber of times a site gets mentioned. When the sample is partitioned bynewspaper or by each newspaper's coverage of nearby sites, a positiverelationship emerges between the proportion of Hispanic or nonwhite residentsand the number of articles about a site. We discuss this apparentcontradiction.