To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Although workplace mental health screening is often implemented to aid early identification of mental health symptoms and facilitate access to treatment, supporting evidence is limited.
Aims
We aimed to evaluate the effect of independently conducted, confidential, online mental health screening, paired with automated tailored feedback recommending referral services, on help-seeking and psychological distress.
Method
We conducted a cluster-randomised controlled trial with firefighters from an Australian fire and rescue service. Randomisation occurred by station (N = 264). Firefighters at stations allocated to the intervention group received tailored information detailing suitable mental health services based on their Kessler-6 psychological distress score (K6). The control group received generic feedback on services irrespective of K6 score. The primary outcome was help-seeking at 3-months post-intervention for those with at least moderate levels of psychological distress at baseline (K6 ≥14). The study was registered with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (no. ANZCTR 12621001457831).
Results
Of the 459 firefighters screened, 141 (30.72%) scored ≥14 on K6. Among this subgroup at 3 months, no differences were observed in rates of overall help-seeking between the intervention and control groups (P = 0.31). In contrast, levels of psychological distress remained high in the intervention group but declined in the control group (t[111] = 2.29, 95% CI: 0.24, 3.23, P = 0.024). The difference in psychological distress associated with workplace mental health screening equated to an effect size of −0.42 (95% CI: −0.04, −0.79).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that independent, confidential online mental health screening, paired with tailored online feedback and information on available treatment, does not significantly increase help-seeking and may sustain psychological distress over time compared with receiving generic information. As such, it should not be implemented to promote help-seeking and reduce levels of psychological distress. These findings are relevant for workplaces, mental health researchers and practitioners alike, highlighting the potential risk and potential harm of mental health screening conducted in this way on individuals.
By
Gina M. Vincent, Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School 55 Lake Avenue North, WSH 8B Worcester, MA 01655 USA,
Thomas Grisso, Professor, Law and Psychiatry Program Department of Psychiatry University of Massachusetts Medical School 55 Lake Avenue North, WSH 8B Worcester, MA 01655 USA,
Anna Terry, Research Associate, Law & Psychiatry Program Department of Psychiatry University of Massachusetts Medical School 55 Lake Avenue Norh, WSH 8B Worcester, MA 01655 USA
This chapter provides a brief description of the benefits and procedures of mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice settings. It begins with a discussion of the reasons for and benefits of identification of mental health problems in juvenile justice settings, and the developmental complications involved in this undertaking. The chapter defines and differentiates mental health screening versus assessment by describing the characteristics of both. Finally, it provides a brief review of the current mental health screening tools, which are in the public domain and have been validated for use in juvenile justice settings. The screening tools are defined along three categories: multidimensional brief screening tools, problem or needs-oriented interview schedules, and multidimensional scales identifying clinical disorder. The selection of tools must be commensurate with the purposes, demands, and constraints of the situations in which they will be used.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.