To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Emerging evidence indicates that gene–environment interactions (GEIs) are important underlying mechanisms for the development of schizophrenia (SZ). We investigated the associations of polygenic risk score for SZ (PRS-SZ), environmental measures, and their interactions with case–control status and clinical phenotypes among patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs).
Methods
The PRS-SZ for 717 SSD patients and 356 healthy controls (HCs) were calculated using the LDpred model. The Korea-Polyenvironmental Risk Score-I (K-PERS-I) and Early Trauma Inventory-Self Report (ETI-SR) were utilized as environmental measures. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to identify the associations of PRS-SZ and two environmental measures with case–control status and clinical phenotypes.
Results
The PRS-SZ explained 8.7% of SZ risk. We found greater associations of PRS-SZ and total scores of the K-PERS-I with case–control status compared to the ETI-SR total score. A significant additive interaction was found between PRS-SZ and K-PERS-I. With the subdomains of the K-PERS-I and ETI-SR, we identified significant multiplicative or additive interactions of PRS-SZ and parental socioeconomic status (pSES), childhood adversity, and recent life events in association with case–control status. For clinical phenotypes, significant interactions were observed between PRS-SZ and the ETI-SR total score for negative-self and between PRS-SZ and obstetric complications within the K-PERS-I for negative-others.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that the use of aggregate scores for genetic and environmental measures, PRS-SZ and K-PERS-I, can more accurately predict case–control status, and specific environmental measures may be more suitable for the exploration of GEIs.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.