To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter reads the late nineteenth-century genres of American naturalism and regionalism through the prism of climate, and finds that their authors depict characters whose characteristics are shaped by their responses to their ambient environments, including climate, and by the inherited effects of their ancestors’ adaptations to theirs. It argues that their thinking about climate was informed by the popular Lamarckian science of their post-Darwinian evolutionary era, by the climate theory of the historian Hippolyte Taine, and by turn-of-the-century geography. In the decades during which Frank Norris, Charles Chesnutt, Edith Wharton, and Hamlin Garland were at work on questions of determinism and/or a “determined indeterminacy,” climatic, genetic, medico-psychiatric, and sociological models of identity vied for authority. The writers drew their representations of the making of Americans from these competing claims.
From his early youth Hippolyte Taine's ambition was to be a philosopher. Sainte-Beuve recognized Taine's approach as an artifice with surprising results, for what the doctoral thesis on La Fontaine actually provided was an indirect method of discussing the nature of Taine's hobby-horse: the self. Leaving aside his youthful search for the mysterious origin or hypothetical purpose of the self, Taine here claims to offer a scientific analysis of its operation through the imagination and the language of the poet. Taine's thinking was unquestionably informed by his reading of philosophy both at the Lycée Bourbon and at the Ecole Normale. Taine's idea concerned the nature of the self. His ambition was to be a philosopher but his method of inquiry was that of science and he applied it to all aspects of humanity, to literature, to art, to history and to psychology.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.