Respected Sir,
This response builds upon previous scholarly discourse concerning medical aid provision in natural disasters, specifically referencing analyses of India’s evolving roleReference Cordero 1 and the disaster response frameworks of other nations, such as the Philippines.Reference Mukhida, Das and Das 2 We note with appreciation the engagement stimulated by our earlier work.
Developing nations frequently exhibit heightened vulnerability to both natural and anthropogenic hazards. While developed countries are also exposed to similar threats, their greater economic capacity and technological infrastructure generally confer enhanced resilience and response capabilities. Developing countries, conversely, often confront specific challenges in disaster preparedness and response, including high population density, complex geographical terrain, limitations in dedicated specialized response personnel, financial constraints, and deficits in specific technical expertise.Reference Zorn, Pelc and Koderman 3 Consequently, international cooperation and mutual assistance during disaster events are crucial for augmenting national response capacities.
India’s recurrent exposure to severe natural disasters, including significant floods, cyclones, tsunamis, and seismic events, underscored the necessity for establishing a dedicated, highly trained, and rapidly deployable national disaster response force.Reference Mukhida, Das and Das 2 , 4 Strategic allocation of national resources, potentially involving a proportion of defense budgets, towards strengthening disaster preparedness and response infrastructure 5 can substantially enhance a nation’s ability to mitigate the impact of domestic disasters and concurrently develop a capacity for supporting affected neighboring and partner nations.
India’s approach to disaster management has undergone a transformative shift over the past 2 decades. Historically, disaster response was often reactive.Reference Deshpande 6 Major events, such as the 1999 Odisha Super Cyclone and the 2001 Gujarat Earthquake, served as catalysts for governmental policy changes, leading to a more proactive and institutionalized framework. During earlier major disasters, international aid played a significant role in recovery efforts.Reference Mukhida, Das and Das 2 , 7 Subsequently, India has increasingly allocated dedicated budgetary resources to its National Disaster Response Force (NDRF). Within 2 decades, India has developed significant domestic response capabilities and has concurrently emerged as a provider of disaster relief assistance to other countries.Reference Mukhida, Das and Das 2
Specific subnational entities within India have also achieved notable effectiveness in disaster management, with Odisha’s cyclone preparedness and response drawing commendation from international bodies like the United Nations. State-level disaster response mechanisms, often supported by state disaster relief funds (e.g., Odisha Disaster Relief Fund) and personnel (SDRF equivalents), contribute significantly to localized response efforts and can also be deployed to assist other states during major crises. 8 The sustainability of these response capacities is maintained through consistent replenishment of dedicated funds via annual governmental budgetary processes, ensuring readiness for deployment across the country.
In conclusion, effective disaster response necessitates robust national capabilities and strong international cooperation. Dedicated and adequately resourced national forces, such as the NDRF, are pivotal components of domestic disaster management frameworks. Timely and appropriate strategic planning and resource allocation are fundamental requirements for enhancing national resilience and ensuring effective response during natural hazard events.
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Author contribution
Dr. NKD: Manuscript writing and concept; Dr. PD: manuscript review and revision; and Dr. SM: literature search, concept, and corresponding.
Competing interests
None.
Ethical standard
Institutional Review Board exempted ethical approval because there are no Human Subjects/patient data.