Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-t9wd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-29T20:43:10.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intractable Focal Epilepsy from Neurobrucellosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2025

Zachariah I. Hasan*
Affiliation:
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital Department of Neurology, Washington, D.C., USA
Jacqueline Barnes
Affiliation:
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital Department of Neurology, Washington, D.C., USA
Sarah Ganji
Affiliation:
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital Department of Neurology, Washington, D.C., USA
Alexander Andrews
Affiliation:
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital Department of Neurology, Washington, D.C., USA
Prishanya Pillai
Affiliation:
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital Department of Infectious Diseases, Washington, D.C., USA
Gholam K. Motamedi
Affiliation:
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital Department of Neurology, Washington, D.C., USA
*
Corresponding author: Zachariah Hasan; Email: Zachariah.I.Hasan@medstar.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information

Type
Letter to the Editor: New Observation
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation

Neurobrucellosis is a rare manifestation of systemic brucellosis, which is one of the most common zoonotic infections worldwide. Brucellosis is endemic to many parts of the world with suboptimal food safety and/or livestock care standards and poses a global public health challenge with an estimated greater than 2 billion people at risk of exposure worldwide. Reference Corbel1 Neurological complications are estimated to occur in less than 10% of systemic brucellosis cases, with predominantly acute syndromes of meningitis, encephalitis, focal myelitis, radiculitis and polyneuropathies of peripheral or cranial nerves reported. Reference Corbel1 Reference Pappas, Akritidis, Bosilkovski and Tsianos,2 Seizure is a rare complication of neurobrucellosis, and cases in the literature report seizures mostly in the setting of acute meningoencephalitis from Brucella spp. leading to cortical excitability. Reference Naderi, Sheybani, Parsa, Haddad and Khoroushi4Reference Yilmaz, Ozaras, Ozturk, Mert, Tabak and Aktuglu6 Here, we report a case of chronic intractable focal epilepsy in the setting of a Brucella melitensis granuloma, expanding our understanding of the neurological manifestations of brucellosis.

A 40-year-old previously healthy immunocompetent man presented to the emergency room after a first-time focal seizure described as right face and arm tonic stiffness with preserved awareness that progressed after a few minutes to loss of consciousness with generalized tonic-clonic shaking and tongue bite. He reported one month of intermittent headaches, right arm burning pain, malaise, tremor and subtle right-sided weakness prior to the seizure. He denied fever or night sweats. On arrival, he was afebrile and without nuchal rigidity or altered mental status. Examination was notable for right face and limb hemisensory loss and weakness. He had immigrated to the USA from Peru 8 months prior to presentation and reported ingesting unpasteurized milk and other dairy products regularly. MRI of the brain with and without gadolinium contrast administration revealed an intra-axial mass in the left frontal lobe with areas of solid enhancement and extensive associated vasogenic edema (Figure 1). Laboratory analysis was notable for an elevated serum white blood cell count of 16.7 K/uL with neutrophil predominance. Pertinent negative serum studies included a negative HIV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) screen, syphilis screen, Lyme PCR, interferon gamma release assay (T-spot) TB test, histoplasma serologies, toxoplasma serologies, coccidioidomycosis serologies and blood cultures. Lumbar puncture with CSF analysis was unremarkable with 3 white blood cells/mm3, 18 red blood cells/mm3, 28 mg/dL protein, 63 mg/dL glucose, a negative meningitis/encephalitis viral/bacterial/fungal CSF screen and negative CSF cultures. Pathology from an excisional brain biopsy revealed necrotizing granulomatous inflammation, without evidence of any neoplastic process, viral cytopathic changes or vasculitic changes. Cultures from the biopsy revealed fastidious growth of gram-negative rods, which speciated into B. melitensis. A diagnosis of neurobrucellosis was made.

Figure 1. Row 1: Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) axial MRI. Row 2: T1 post-gadolinium contrast axial MRI. Presence of hyperintense signal abnormalities with cortical and subcortical involvement. Patchy enhancing foci along the cortex and adjacent subcortical white matter involving the left motor gyrus in the posterior left frontal lobe.

While hospitalized, dual therapy with levetiracetam and lacosamide was needed for breakthrough seizure control, and IV dexamethasone was added to reduce vasogenic edema. Long-term video electroencephalogram monitoring found left frontal focal slowing and intermittent left frontal epileptiform abnormalities (Figure 2). The patient then had a subtotal resection of the frontal granulomatous lesion. He was treated with 6 weeks of IV ceftriaxone 2 g daily, followed by 6 months of oral doxycycline 100 mg BID and rifampin 600 mg daily. Interval imaging at 6 months revealed improvement, but portions of the granuloma with enhancement were still present, so oral antibiotic treatment was extended 6 additional months. A brain MRI 14 months after initial presentation and post-completion of the antibiotic regimen showed near complete resolution of the nodular enhancing lesion. Subsequently, he was admitted to the epilepsy monitoring unit for a controlled seizure medication wean. Unfortunately, this led to breakthrough focal seizures requiring continued treatment with both lacosamide and levetiracetam. With physical rehabilitation, the patient gradually regained much of his strength in his right arm and leg but still has residual sensory deficits.

Figure 2. Electroencephalogram recording with evidence of interictal left fronto-central sharp and slow discharge, maximum at the F3 electrode. This localization correlates with the cortical irritability most likely caused by the left frontal granuloma seen on imaging and indicates the potential seizure focus.

Brucella spp. likely invade the central nervous system (CNS) through hematogenous spread to the meninges. Reference Bouferraa, Bou Zerdan, Hamouche, Azar, Afif and Jabbour3 Damage to neurologic tissues is suspected to be due to direct neuropathic effects of the bacteria and/or abnormal host inflammatory response to organisms. Reference Bouferraa, Bou Zerdan, Hamouche, Azar, Afif and Jabbour3 Neurobrucellosis has most often been described in cases of acute meningitis and meningoencephalitis.Reference Corbel1Reference Naderi, Sheybani, Parsa, Haddad and Khoroushi4 Within the peripheral nervous system, peripheral neuropathy and radiculopathy have been described including acute demyelinating polyneuropathy (Guillain–Barre syndrome). Reference Corbel1Reference Naderi, Sheybani, Parsa, Haddad and Khoroushi4 In the CNS, brain abscesses, mycotic aneurysms, cerebral vasculitis, subarachnoid hemorrhage and spinal cord myelitis have been seen.Reference Corbel1Reference Naderi, Sheybani, Parsa, Haddad and Khoroushi4 Granulomatous inflammation from neurobrucellosis, as seen in this case, has rarely been described in the literature, and the associated clinical syndrome is less well defined. Reference Bouferraa, Bou Zerdan, Hamouche, Azar, Afif and Jabbour3Reference Alqwaifly, Al-Ajlan, Al-Hindi and Al Semari5 Seizures associated with neurobrucellosis have been reported in the setting of acute meningitis, encephalitis and vascular complications, but cases of chronic epilepsy are rare. Reference Naderi, Sheybani, Parsa, Haddad and Khoroushi4Reference Yilmaz, Ozaras, Ozturk, Mert, Tabak and Aktuglu6 For our patient, direct cortical irritation from the granuloma likely contributed to a chronic focal epilepsy. There have been pediatric cases of CNS brucella abscess leading to epilepsy reported in the literature. Reference Yilmaz, Ozaras, Ozturk, Mert, Tabak and Aktuglu6 One case from Saudi Arabia describes persistent epileptic auras without major seizures in an immunocompromised patient post-renal transplantation, who developed a CNS brucella granuloma. Reference Alqwaifly, Al-Ajlan, Al-Hindi and Al Semari5 In contrast, this case describes a CNS brucella granuloma leading to epilepsy in an immunocompetent patient.

There are few guidelines for the optimal approach to treatment of neurobrucellosis as data is limited to observational and retrospective studies. Reference Pappas, Akritidis, Bosilkovski and Tsianos2Reference Bouferraa, Bou Zerdan, Hamouche, Azar, Afif and Jabbour3, Reference Zhao, Cheng, Liao, Zhang, Yin and Shi7Reference Erdem, Ulu-Kilic and Kilic8 Duration of treatment could potentially be tailored to the presence of symptoms and neuroimaging response to therapy. Reference Zhao, Cheng, Liao, Zhang, Yin and Shi7Reference Erdem, Ulu-Kilic and Kilic8 In this case, after continued presence of enhancement of the Brucella lesion despite resection and 6 months of antibiotic therapy, a multidisciplinary decision was made to continue oral antibiotics for an additional 6 months.

This case of neurobrucellosis presenting as focal epilepsy highlights important considerations in the presentation and sequelae of the disease. Brucellosis remains an important zoonosis to better characterize, given it is endemic to much of the world, with billions at risk of exposure annually. Reference Corbel1 In retrospect, repeated ingestion of unpasteurized dairy products while living in Peru was the likely source of infection for our patient. Globalization could bring more cases from endemic regions into the health systems of non-endemic regions. As such, increasing awareness of neurobrucellosis and additional research into the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and potential treatments of neurobrucellosis could have broad public health benefits.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patient for his willingness to share his story and for consenting to its publication. We also thank the multitude of healthcare professionals who have assisted in the diagnosis and management of this patient.

Author contributions

Z.H., J.B., S.G., A.A., P.P. and G.M. all contributed to the conceptualization, design and content of this manuscript. Z.H., J.B., S.G. and P.P. contributed to manuscript drafting, background research, creation of figures and revision. A.A. and G.M. contributed to supervision and manuscript editing.

Funding statement

None.

Competing interests

Z.H., J.B., S.G., A.A., P.P. and G.M. (all authors) have no relevant disclosures and have completed ICJME disclosure forms that have been submitted to the editorial board.

References

Corbel, MJ, et al. Brucellosis in Humans and Animals. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organization & World Organisation for Animal Health; 2006: ix, 89 p. ISBN 92 4 154713 8.Google Scholar
Pappas, G, Akritidis, N, Bosilkovski, M, Tsianos, E. Brucellosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:23252336. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra050570.10.1056/NEJMra050570CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouferraa, Y, Bou Zerdan, M, Hamouche, R, Azar, E, Afif, C, Jabbour, R. Neurobrucellosis : Brief Review. Neurologist. 2021;26:248–52. DOI: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000348. Published 2021 Nov 4.10.1097/NRL.0000000000000348CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naderi, H, Sheybani, F, Parsa, A, Haddad, M, Khoroushi, F. Neurobrucellosis: report of 54 cases. Trop Med Health. 2022;50:77. DOI: 10.1186/s41182-022-00472-x.10.1186/s41182-022-00472-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alqwaifly, M, Al-Ajlan, FS, Al-Hindi, H, Al Semari, A. Central nervous system brucellosis granuloma and white matter disease in immunocompromised patient. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:978981. DOI: 10.3201/eid2306.161173.10.3201/eid2306.161173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yilmaz, M, Ozaras, R, Ozturk, R, Mert, A, Tabak, F, Aktuglu, Y. Epileptic seizure: an atypical presentation in an adolescent boy with neurobrucellosis. Scand J Infect Dis. 2002;34:623625. DOI: 10.1080/00365540210147561.10.1080/00365540210147561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, S, Cheng, Y, Liao, Y, Zhang, Z, Yin, X, Shi, S. Treatment efficacy and risk factors of neurobrucellosis. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:10051012. DOI: 10.12659/msm.897947.10.12659/MSM.897947CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erdem, H, Ulu-Kilic, A, Kilic, S, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of antibiotic combinations in neurobrucellosis: results of the Istanbul study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:15231528. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.05974-11.10.1128/AAC.05974-11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Row 1: Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) axial MRI. Row 2: T1 post-gadolinium contrast axial MRI. Presence of hyperintense signal abnormalities with cortical and subcortical involvement. Patchy enhancing foci along the cortex and adjacent subcortical white matter involving the left motor gyrus in the posterior left frontal lobe.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Electroencephalogram recording with evidence of interictal left fronto-central sharp and slow discharge, maximum at the F3 electrode. This localization correlates with the cortical irritability most likely caused by the left frontal granuloma seen on imaging and indicates the potential seizure focus.