Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sq2k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T08:46:38.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of S100 family proteins in colorectal cancer (CRC): an overview of their potential function as new biomarkers and therapeutic agents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2025

Hamideh Raeisi*
Affiliation:
Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Centre, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Leili Rejali
Affiliation:
Basic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Centre, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Nayeralsadat Fatemi
Affiliation:
Basic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Centre, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Amir Sadeghi
Affiliation:
Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Centre, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Zahra Sadeghloo
Affiliation:
Basic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Centre, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Reza Zali
Affiliation:
Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Centre, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad*
Affiliation:
Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Centre, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
Corresponding authors: Hamideh Raeisi and Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad; Emails: ha.raeesi@gmail.com; ehsanmojarad@gmail.com
Corresponding authors: Hamideh Raeisi and Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad; Emails: ha.raeesi@gmail.com; ehsanmojarad@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second deadliest cancer worldwide, posing a great threat to human health and a social burden. Various genetic and epigenetic alterations can activate tumourigenesis-related signalling pathways, leading to CRC development and progression. Over the past two decades, the understanding of the role of S100 family proteins in different types of cancer has received great attention. S100 proteins, as intracellular and extracellular, play important roles in regulating various cellular processes, such as calcium homeostasis, apoptosis, tumour cell proliferation, invasion and motility. It is well documented that alteration in expression of S100 proteins can be associated with tumourigenesis and cancer progression. These proteins play important roles in CRC carcinogenesis by activating different signalling pathways, especially the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signalling pathway, which is involved in cell proliferation, invasion and migration. In this review, we describe the functions of S100 proteins in the context of inflammation, tumourigenesis, cancer progression, metastasis, and drug resistance in CRC. We also discuss the potential of targeting different S100 proteins as prognostic factors and therapeutic agents for CRC treatment. This narrative review will increase our understanding of the role of S100 proteins in the progression of CRC and provide insights into the use of S100 proteins as new biomarkers and therapeutic targets for CRC therapy.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most fatal cancer and the third most prevalent malignant tumour worldwide, causing a highly heterogeneous malignancy in colon and rectum tissues (Ref. Reference Hossain, Karuniawati, Jairoun, Urbi, Ooi, John and Hadi1). Surveillance data from 2018 estimated the number of CRCs at approximately 1.8 million new cases and 881,000 deaths, accounting for nearly 10% of new cancer cases and cancer deaths worldwide (Ref. Reference Bray, Ferlay, Soerjomataram, Siegel, Torre and Jemal2). CRC is multifactorial in origin; for example, age (>50 years) and genetics (family history of polyps and CRC) are the main risk factors for this cancer (Ref. Reference Keum and Giovannucci3). Several environmental factors, such as obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, high-fat/low-fibre diets, and chronic intestinal inflammation, may increase the risk of CRC (Refs. Reference Chen, Jansen, Guo, Hoffmeister, Chang-Claude and Brenner4, Reference Soltani, Poursheikhani, Yassi, Hayatbakhsh, Kerachian and Kerachian5). CRC typically develops in several stages, from polyps and adenocarcinoma to malignant tumours (Ref. Reference Simon6), and progresses in four steps, including initiation, promotion, progression and metastasis (Ref. Reference de Visser and Joyce7). Initiation of CRC involves irreversible genetic alteration, resulting in neoplastic transformation. In promotion, cell proliferation leads to abnormal growth. The progression phase contains aberrations of genetic/epigenetic that convert benign cells to malignant cells, resulting in aggressive characteristics and metastasis. Eventually, the potential spread to other organs of the body through the blood and lymph nodes occurs during the metastasis phase (Refs. Reference Hossain, Karuniawati, Jairoun, Urbi, Ooi, John and Hadi1, Reference Simon6).

So far, different classifications have identified CRC subtypes with distinctive genotypic and phenotypic traits. In this regard, the CRC Subtyping Consortium (CRCSC) established a classification system for CRCs in 2015 and grouped them into four consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) based on distinct gene expression patterns (Ref. Reference Guinney, Dienstmann, Wang, de Reyniès, Schlicker, Soneson and Tejpar8). In this classification, CMS1 (MSI-immune, 14%) is characterised by high microsatellite instability (MSI), low chromosomal instability (CIN), hypermutation, hypermethylation and strong immune infiltration and activation. CMS2 (canonical, 37%) is featured by high CIN, high epithelial differentiation, and a large number of somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs). CMS3 (metabolic, 13%) is distinguished by the dysregulation of genes associated with cellular metabolic processes, the presence of kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) mutations, and CpG island methylator phenotype-low (CIMP-low). CMS4 (mesenchymal, 23%) is characterised by the widespread activation of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signalling, and the overexpression of genes involved in inflammation, stromal invasion and angiogenesis. Notably, patients with CMS4 have worse overall and relapse-free survival rates than those with the other three subtypes. In addition to CMSs, an unclassified group (mixed features, 13%) is characterised by transition phenotype or intratumoural heterogeneity (Refs. Reference Guinney, Dienstmann, Wang, de Reyniès, Schlicker, Soneson and Tejpar8, Reference Singh, Rai, Pandey, Singh and Srivastava9).

Using transcriptional analysis, a classification based on tumour biology regardless of mutational status was published in 2023 and characterised three pathway-derived subtypes (PDSs) for CRC, including PDS1 tumours with canonical/LGR5+ stem-rich cells, upregulated cell cycle pathways, and good prognosis; PDS2 tumours with regenerative/ANXA1+ stem-rich cells, upregulated inflammatory and immune signalling pathways and elevated stromal and immune tumour microenvironmental lineages; and PDS3 tumours with decreased stem cell populations and increased differentiated lineages and displayed the worst prognosis in locally advanced disease. In line with CMS associations, CMS groups can be combined in PDS subtypes; accordingly, the inflammatory/stromal CMS1 and CMS4 tumours are distinguished as PDS2, and CMS2 and CMS3 tumours are characterised as PDS1 and PDS3 (Ref. Reference Malla, Byrne, Lafarge, Corry, Fisher, Tsantoulis and Consortium10). Remarkably, CMSs and PDSs are robust classifications for CRC, providing deeper insights into CRC biology.

In the past two decades, various epidemiological and experimental studies have suggested that changes in the expression of some proteins, such as S100 proteins, may increase the probability of occurrence of various cancers (Refs.Reference Diamantopoulou, Mantas, Kostakis, Agrogiannis, Garoufalia, Kavantzas and Kouraklis11Reference Duan, Wu, Zou, Wang, Ye, Li and Zhou15). S100 proteins belong to the largest subfamily of EF-hand-type calcium-binding proteins (Ref. Reference Singh and Ali16). S100 proteins can interact with various protein targets, resulting in the activation of different intracellular and extracellular cascades (Ref. Reference Gonzalez, Garrie and Turner17). Thus, these proteins influence several functions in cellular processes, such as Ca2+ homeostasis, inflammation, apoptosis, tumourigenesis, metastasis and drug resistance (Ref. Reference Singh and Ali16). Accumulated data have demonstrated that different members of the S100 family are involved in the activation of various signalling pathways related to cancer and affect the expression of genes related to cancer progression, such as nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), β-catenin and p53 (Refs. Reference Hou, Tian, Qi, Sun, Yuan, Wang and Zhang18Reference Kwon, Moon, Park, Choi and Park21).

This review discusses the roles of S100 proteins in inflammation, cancer development and progression and resistance to chemotherapy. In addition, the potential of different S100 proteins as prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic agents for CRC is summarised. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the importance of S100 proteins in tumourigenesis, their potential as diagnostic agents for managing cancer and their role as therapeutic agents in suppressing cancer development and progression.

Function of S100 proteins

S100 is a subfamily of low-molecular-weight calcium-binding proteins with more than 20 known human members with similar structures but different functions (Ref. Reference Singh and Ali16). These proteins were named ‘S100’ because they exhibit 100% solubility in ammonium sulfate at neutral pH (Ref. Reference Donato22). Among human S100 genes, group A is located in the chromosomal regions of 1q21, whereas other members are located in different chromosomal regions (Ref. Reference Gonzalez, Garrie and Turner17), including S100B (21q22), S100G (Xp22), S100P (4p16) and S100Z (5q14) (Ref. Reference Leśniak and Graczyk-Jarzynka23). All S100 proteins have a similar molecular weight of about 10–12 KDa with 25–65% similarity in their amino acid sequence (Refs. Reference Singh and Ali16, Reference Gonzalez, Garrie and Turner17). The functions of S100 proteins are regulated via two different mechanisms: (1) binding of metal ions Ca2+, which activates the protein to bind partner proteins, and transition metals (e.g., Zn2+, Cu2+, Mn2+), which serve in antimicrobial functions; (2) formation of homo- and hetero-oligomers (Ref. Reference Singh and Ali16). S100 proteins consist of two helix–loop–helix structural motifs (known as EF-hands (EF-1 and EF-2)) connected through a flexible hinge region in the center and flanked by hydrophobic residues at the N- and C-termini (Refs. Reference Singh and Ali16, Reference Gonzalez, Garrie and Turner17). S100 proteins (except S100G) are obligate dimers with a contiguous hydrophobic core (Ref. Reference Donato22) and also form higher-order oligomers typically mediated by metal binding. The most highly characterised S100 protein heterodimer is S100A8/S100A9 (calprotectin), a crucial mediator of inflammatory and immune responses (Ref. Reference Chang, Chou, Chen, Tsai, Sun, Lin and Lin24). Other examples of S100 protein heterodimeric complexes include S100A1/ S100B, S100A11/ S100B, S100A1/ S100A4 and S100A1/S100P (Ref. Reference Spratt, Barber, Marlatt, Ngo, Macklin, Xiao and Shaw25).

S100 proteins are multifunctional with intracellular and extracellular activities in different cell types. Intracellular S100 proteins are associated with the regulation of various cellular processes, such as calcium homeostasis, cell growth, cell cycle, cytoskeletal components, phosphorylation and modulation of transcriptional factors (Ref. Reference Singh and Ali16). In the extracellular milieu, S100 proteins can act in a cytokine-like manner, binding to cell surface receptors such as the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), toll-like receptors (TLRs), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) and scavenger receptors (SRs), which activate different signalling pathways related to cell proliferation and differentiation, particularly the NF-κB signalling pathway (Figure 1) (Refs. Reference Gonzalez, Garrie and Turner17, Reference Kwon, Moon, Park, Choi and Park21, Reference Yu, Lu, Li, Xiao, Xing, Li and Wu26, Reference Jingjing, Tongqian, Shirong, Lan, Jing, Shihui and Fang27).

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the signalling pathways activated by extracellular S100 proteins. These proteins bind to different cell surface receptors, including RAGE, TLR4, EGFR, GPCR, and SR, and subsequently activate several signalling pathways involved in cancer progression. RAGE-mediated signalling activates MAPK, PI3K/AKT, and β-catenin pathways. TLR4-mediated signalling activates MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways. GPCR, EGFR-, and SR-mediated signalling activate MAPK pathways. The activation of these signalling pathways subsequently activates signalling cascades related to cancer progression, especially NF-κB signalling pathways, leading to the upregulation of genes involved in cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance. Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; AP-1, activator protein 1; c-myc, cellular myelocytomatosis oncogene; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK, extracellular signalling-related kinase; GPCR, G protein coupled receptor; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; PI3K, phosphatidyl inositol 3 phosphate; RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end products; RAF, rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; RAS, rat sarcoma virus; SR, scavenger receptor; TCF/LEF, T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor; TLR4, toll-like receptor 4.

Different S100 proteins can bind to the same targets because of their high sequence and structural similarity. For example, S100A1, S100A6 and S100B interact with annexin 6 (ANXA6), and S100A1, S100A2, S100A4, and S100B can interact with p53, a tumour suppressor (Ref. Reference Gonzalez, Garrie and Turner17). Despite these similarities in binding partners, the most variable portion of S100 proteins is the regions exposed upon Ca2+ binding, which does provide a degree of selectivity for target proteins (Ref. Reference Gonzalez, Garrie and Turner17). Selectivity is provided by differences in the protein surface and the distribution of hydrophobic and charged residues (Ref. Reference Singh and Ali16). This in turn provides the functional diversity, for example, the involvement of S100A1, S100A4, S100A6 and S100A9 in cytoskeleton assembly, involvement of S100A4, S100A11, S100A14 and S100B in DNA repair and transcriptional regulation, involvement of S100A6, S100A8/S100A9 and S100B in cell differentiation, involvement of S100A4, S100A8/S100A9, S100A12 and S100A13 in inflammation state, and involvement of S100A6, S100A9 and S100B in cell growth and migration have been reported in different studies (Refs. Reference Singh and Ali16, Reference Kilańczyk, Graczyk, Ostrowska, Kasacka, Leśniak and Filipek19, Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28Reference Xiao, Li, Ji, Jiang, Ni, Zhu and Ni34). Some functions of S100 proteins in cancer progression are described in the following.

Roles of S100 proteins in cancer

The upregulation of S100 proteins in different diseases has attracted considerable attention, particularly in oncological research (Refs. Reference Zhao, Zhang and Wang12, Reference Gonzalez, Garrie and Turner17, Reference Zhang, Zhang, Jiang and Zhang47, Reference Li, Zhang, Qian, Wu, Sun, Ling and Xu52, Reference Fang, Zhang, Xu, Liu, Mo, Sun and Lan71, Reference Peterova, Bures, Moravkova and Kohoutova79). Most of the S100 protein genes are located in the human chromosomal region of 1q21, and genomic instability of this region is often observed in various tumours (Refs. Reference Sawyer, Tian, Walker, Wardell, Lukacs, Sammartino and van Rhee80, Reference Chen, Chan and Guan81). Multiple lines of evidence have demonstrated that altered expression of S100 proteins, typically upregulation, can be associated with tumour development, angiogenesis and metastasis (Refs. Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28, Reference Seguella, Rinaldi, Marianecci, Capuano, Pesce, Annunziata and Sarnelli82, Reference Huang, Wang, Chang, Hsiao, Wang and Lin83). In addition, several S100 proteins appear to contribute to drug resistance and may mediate responses to chemotherapy (Refs. Reference Cui, Li, Li, Yin, Lane, Ji and Jiang61, Reference Bertram, Palfner, Hiddemann and Kneba84, Reference Mencía, Selga, Rico, de Almagro, Villalobos, Ramirez and Ciudad85). S100 proteins are expressed in a tissue-dependent manner, and the function of different S100 proteins may be different in various cancers (Ref. Reference Gonzalez, Garrie and Turner17). For example, S100A2 acts as a tumour suppressor in oral cancer, while it facilitates tumour growth in lung cancer (Refs. Reference Naz, Bashir, Ranganathan, Bodapati, Santosh and Kondaiah33, Reference Tsai, Jin, Tsai, Wang, Lin, Chang and Wu86). Pathologic S100 signalling has been explored in melanoma, breast, lung and ovarian cancers (Refs. Reference Xiong, Pan and Li87Reference Bai, Li, Li and Lu90). Moreover, multifunctional roles of S100 proteins in gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers have been identified (Table 1).

Table 1. S100 proteins: characterisation and function in GI tract cancers

Abbreviations: ANX, annexin; CRC, colorectal cancer, EC, esophageal cancer; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; FGF1, fibroblast growth factor 1; FGFR, fibroblast growth factor receptor; GC, gastric cancer; GI tract, gastrointestinal tract; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptors; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; PDAC, pancreatic adenocarcinoma; RAGE, advanced glycation end products; RARα, retinoic acid receptor alpha; SR, scavenger receptor; TLR4, toll-like receptor4.

S100 proteins play a role in the progression of CRC. The most important signalling pathways involved in cancer development are the wingless-related integration site (Wnt), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), p53, TGF-β and EGFR signalling pathways (Ref. Reference Koveitypour, Panahi, Vakilian, Peymani, Seyed Forootan, Nasr Esfahani and Ghaedi105). These signalling pathways trigger the activation of various genes, such as β-catenin, p53, RAS and rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF), which may be involved in CRC progression (Refs. Reference Koveitypour, Panahi, Vakilian, Peymani, Seyed Forootan, Nasr Esfahani and Ghaedi105, Reference Al-Shamsi, Jones, Fahmawi, Dahbour, Tabash, Abdel-Wahab and Wolff106). Interestingly, some components of these signalling pathways regulate the expression of different S100 proteins. For example, previous studies have indicated that S100A4 is a direct transcriptional target of the Wnt/β-catenin/TCF-mediated signalling pathway. Interestingly, inhibition of the expression of β-catenin can lead to reduced levels of S100A4 in in vitro and in vivo CRC models (Refs. Reference Sack, Walther, Scudiero, Selby, Aumann, Lemos and Stein107, Reference Stein, Arlt, Smith, Sack, Herrmann, Walther and Schlag108). S100A6 is also transcriptionally regulated by β-catenin in CRC cells (Ref. Reference Kilańczyk, Graczyk, Ostrowska, Kasacka, Leśniak and Filipek19), which stimulates tumour cell proliferation and migration (Ref. Reference Duan, Wu, Zou, Wang, Ye, Li and Zhou15). EGF stimulates the expression of S100 proteins, such as S100A2, S100A7 and S100A9 (Refs. Reference Stoll, Zhao and Elder109Reference Bergenfelz, Gaber, Allaoui, Mehmeti, Jirström, Leanderson and Leandersson111). P53 can interact with the promoters of S100 proteins, such as S100A2, S100A4, S100A9 and S100B, and increase their expression levels (Refs. Reference Li, Chen, Ding, Zhang, Luo, Wang and Liu101, Reference Van Dieck, Fernandez-Fernandez, Veprintsev and Fersht112Reference Lin, Yang, Yan, Markowitz, Wilder, Carrier and Weber115). In addition, intracellular S100 proteins can function in the regulation of key cellular factors and drivers of cancer, e.g., NF-κB, Wnt/β-catenin, AKT, p53 and MAPK cascades (including extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), p38 kinases) (Figure 2). The activation of these signalling pathways by S100 proteins has been shown in different GI cancers (Table 2).

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the intracellular activity of S100 proteins in signalling pathways involved in CRC. The Wnt signalling pathway is activated after binding Wnt to the Frizzled receptor, resulting in the translocation of β-catenin from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. In the nucleus, β- catenin interacts with TCF/LEF transcription factors. EGF binding to EGFR activates PI3K/AKT/mTOR and ERK signalling pathways. The TGF-β signalling pathway is activated after TGF-β binding to TGF-βR, leading to the formation of a trimeric complex of Smad. This complex is translocated to the nucleus, influencing gene expression related to cancer progression. The activation of these signalling pathways upregulates the expression of genes involved in cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, invasion, and metastasis. The binding of S100 proteins to P53 suppress p53 signalling pathway and pathways related to apoptosis. Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; Bax, Bcl-2-associated protein x; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK, extracellular signalling-related kinase; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; PI3K, phosphatidyl inositol 3 phosphate; RAF, rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; RAS, rat sarcoma virus; TCF/LEF, T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor; TGF-β: transforming growth factor-β; TGF-βR: transforming growth factor-β receptor; SMAD, suppressor of mothers against decapentaplegic; Wnt, wingless-related integration site.

Table 2. Signalling pathways activated by S100 protein in GI tract cancers

Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; ANXA2, annexin A2; c-myc, cellular myelocytomatosis oncogene; CRC, colorectal cancer, EC, esophageal cancer; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor, EMT, epithelial mesenchymal transition; ERK1/2, extracellular signal-regulated kinase ½; FGF19, fibroblast growth factor 19; GC, gastric cancer; GI tract, gastrointestinal tract; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; KRAS, kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88; PDAC, pancreatic adenocarcinoma; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; RAGE, advanced glycation end products; TCF/LEF, T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor; TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor alpha; SCCOC, squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity; Wnt, wingless-related integration site.

Role of S100 proteins in inflammation

Inflammation is a normal pathological process that is activated by infections at a specific tissue or organ site, but it can also be activated in disease states. Examples include microbial infections, such as Helicobacter pylori (Ref. Reference Wang, Zhao, Shao and Yao116), metabolic disorders, such as diabetes and obesity (Ref. Reference Rohm, Meier, Olefsky and Donath117), autoimmune disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (Ref. Reference Franks and Slansky118), and environmental factors, such as heavy smoking (Ref. Reference Elisia, Lam, Cho, Hay, Li, Yeung and Krystal119). Although cancer is multifactorial in origin, evidence has accumulated that chronic inflammatory conditions likely affect the development of various cancers, including gastric, liver, colorectal and pancreatic cancers (Refs. Reference Kwon, Moon, Park, Choi and Park21, Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28, Reference Liao, Chen, Tsai, Wang, Chang, Wu and Chow54, Reference Nedjadi, Evans, Sheikh, Barerra, Al-Ghamdi, Oldfield and Costello100). Chronic inflammation enhances the risk of tumourigenesis, metastasis, and treatment resistance in CRC (Refs. Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28, Reference Alorda-Clara, Torrens-Mas, Hernández-López, de la Rosa, Falcó, Fernández and Roca120, Reference Sui, Zhang, Chen, Tang, Yu, Li and Ding121). For example, patients with IBD are at a higher risk of developing CRC because similar signalling pathways that mediate cell proliferation, survival, migration and angiogenesis are chronically activated (Ref. Reference Linson and Hanauer122).

Among S100 proteins, S100A8 and S100A9 homodimers and heterodimers (S100A8/S100A9) are known as inflammation biomarkers (Refs. Reference Chang, Chou, Chen, Tsai, Sun, Lin and Lin24, Reference Saviano, Migneco, Brigida, Petruzziello, Zanza, Savioli and Ojetti123). These proteins play decisive roles in the development of certain inflammatory processes (Refs. Reference Raeisi, Azimirad, Schiopu, Zarnani, Asadzadeh Aghdaei, Abdemohamadi and Yadegar20, Reference Turovskaya, Foell, Sinha, Vogl, Newlin, Nayak and Srikrishna124). A role for S100A8/S100A9 in the context of an increased risk of CRC in patients with IBD has been proposed (Ref. Reference Turovskaya, Foell, Sinha, Vogl, Newlin, Nayak and Srikrishna124). S100A8, S100A9 and S100A8/S100A9 are ligands for TLR4, which activate the NF-κB signalling pathway and elevate cytokine production (Refs. Reference Raeisi, Azimirad, Schiopu, Zarnani, Asadzadeh Aghdaei, Abdemohamadi and Yadegar20, Reference Ma, Sun, Zhang, Zhang and Yao125). In addition to interacting with TLR4, S100A4, S100A7, S100A8/S100A9 and S100B bind to RAGE, activate NF-κB signalling and MAPK cascades, and increase the production of cytokines and chemokines (Figure 3A) (Refs. Reference Kwon, Moon, Park, Choi and Park21, Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28, Reference Liu, Bunston, Hodson, Resaul, Sun, Cai and Ye51, Reference Seguella, Rinaldi, Marianecci, Capuano, Pesce, Annunziata and Sarnelli82). The activation of these molecules triggers immune responses via leukocyte recruitment, leading to the induction of immune cell-related factors and the promotion of a self-amplifying feedback cycle through the increase in the expression levels of different cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (Refs. Reference Raeisi, Azimirad, Schiopu, Zarnani, Asadzadeh Aghdaei, Abdemohamadi and Yadegar20, Reference Jingjing, Tongqian, Shirong, Lan, Jing, Shihui and Fang27, Reference Ma, Sun, Zhang, Zhang and Yao125). These cascades alter pathways related to cell proliferation and growth factors that promote cancer progression (Ref. Reference Koveitypour, Panahi, Vakilian, Peymani, Seyed Forootan, Nasr Esfahani and Ghaedi105).

Figure 3. Schematic overview of the potential mechanisms of extracellular and intracellular S100 proteins during CRC progression. (A) inflammation inducers activate neutrophils and monocytes, leading to increase the release of S100 proteins such as S100A8 and S100A9. These proteins are the ligands of TLR4, which activates the NF-κB signalling pathway and elevates cytokine production, resulting in increases inflammation in epithelial cells. (B) Overexpression of S100A8 and S100A9 activates various immune cells (e.g., neutrophils, macrophages, T cells), leading to excessive production of cytokines. The increased expression of S100 proteins and cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IFN-γ stimulates the production of ROS and RNS, resulting in the induction of mutagenesis in premalignant cells. (C) S100 proteins and cytokines releases from cells can directly or indirectly affect cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. (D) Extracellular S100 proteins such as S100A4, S100A8, S100A9, and S100A8/S100A9 activate NF-κB and MAPK signalling and subsequently promote CRC cell survival and proliferation. Intracellular S100 proteins, such as S100A2, S100A4, S100A8, S100A9, S100A8/S100A9, S100B, and S100P, regulate signalling pathways related to cancer progression such as AKT, TGF-β, β-catenin, and P53, which are involved in the cell growth, proliferation, invasion or metastasis of CRC. Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; IL, interleukin; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; RAGE, advanced glycosylation end-product receptor; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RNS, reactive nitrogen species; TGF-β: Transforming Growth Factor-β; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor alpha.

S100A4 and S100B can bind to p53, leading to decreased p53 binding of DNA and transcriptional activity, thereby compromising the tumour-suppressor activity of p53 (Refs. Reference Orre, Panizza, Kaminskyy, Vernet, Gräslund, Zhivotovsky and Lehtiö114, Reference Lin, Blake, Tang, Zimmer, Rustandi, Weber and Carrier126). The loss of functional p53 induces the activation of NF-κB signalling and facilitates the secretion of Wnt ligands, which subsequently increase the expression of inflammatory markers and facilitate systemic neutrophilic inflammation (Ref. Reference Wellenstein, Coffelt, Duits, van Miltenburg, Slagter, de Rink and de Visser127). These finding suggest that S100 proteins can stimulate cytokine secretion through different cancer-related signalling pathways and may trigger chronic inflammation, thereby facilitating tumour progression.

Impact of S100 proteins on promoting tumourigenesis in CRC

S100 proteins exhibit a range of biological activities during cancer development and can act as mediators in cancer progression (Ref. Reference Gonzalez, Garrie and Turner17). Moreover, the modes of action of S100 proteins can be altered according to the stage of cancer. The regulatory roles of S100 proteins in the progression of CRC are discussed in the following sections.

Role of S100 protein in CRC initiation

Tumour initiation is the initial stage of tumourigenesis. At this stage, irreversible genetic changes caused by oncogenic factors transform normal cells into malignant cells (Ref. Reference Testa, Pelosi and Castelli128). S100A1, S100A8 and S100A9 stimulate the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) (Refs. Reference Yu, Lu, Li, Xiao, Xing, Li and Wu26, Reference Simard, Cesaro, Chapeton-Montes, Tardif, Antoine, Girard and Tessier29). The increase in these factors may lead to the activation of oxidative stress, resulting in damage to different biological macromolecules, including proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids (Ref. Reference Pizzino, Irrera, Cucinotta, Pallio, Mannino, Arcoraci and Bitto129). The most sensitive target of oxidative stress is DNA, in which case ROS and RNS can cause DNA damage and mutations by incusing oxidation, halogenation, deamination, lipid peroxidation-derived adducts, and single- or double-strand breaks (Ref. Reference Kay, Thadhani, Samson and Engelward130). In addition, the binding of extracellular S100A1, S100A4, S100A6, S100A8/S100A9, S100A11, S100A12, S100A14, S100B, and S100P to TLRs and RAGE and activation of cellular signalling pathways resulting in the release of cytokines from inflammatory cells leads to ROS generation (Refs. Reference Duan, Wu, Zou, Wang, Ye, Li and Zhou15, Reference Simard, Cesaro, Chapeton-Montes, Tardif, Antoine, Girard and Tessier29, Reference Piazza, Leggiero, De Benedictis, Pastore, Salvatore, Tufano and De Robertis31, Reference Seguella, Rinaldi, Marianecci, Capuano, Pesce, Annunziata and Sarnelli82, Reference Cerezo, Remáková, Tomčik, Gay, Neidhart, Lukanidin and Šenolt131) and may contribute to the induction of mutagenesis in premalignant cells (Figure 3B). In summary, S100 proteins are implicated in cancer initiation by stimulating oxidative stress and inducing the expression of inflammatory cytokines.

Role of S100 proteins in CRC progression

The influence of pro-tumour factors and other specific conditions on damaged cells subsequently leads to the development of pre-malignant cells, which is known as the tumour promotion stage (Ref. Reference Testa, Pelosi and Castelli128). At this stage, cells undergo malignant conversion, resulting in aberrant proliferation to form the primary tumour and enter the stage of tumour progression (including tumour infiltration, invasion, and metastasis) (Figure 3C) (Refs. Reference Koveitypour, Panahi, Vakilian, Peymani, Seyed Forootan, Nasr Esfahani and Ghaedi105, Reference Hibino, Kawazoe, Kasahara, Itoh, Ishimoto, Sakata-Yanagimoto and Taniguchi132). S100A2, S100A4, S100A6, S100A7, S100A8/S100A9 and S100B, either as intracellular or extracellular factors, may exhibit malignancy-promoting effects and may be associated with the regulation of cell cycle progression, proliferation, migration, and local invasion in cancers (Refs. Reference Duan, Wu, Zou, Wang, Ye, Li and Zhou15, Reference Naz, Bashir, Ranganathan, Bodapati, Santosh and Kondaiah33, Reference Liu, Bunston, Hodson, Resaul, Sun, Cai and Ye51, Reference Duan, Wu, Ye, Wang, Yang, Zhang and Zhou95, Reference Sack, Walther, Scudiero, Selby, Aumann, Lemos and Stein107, Reference Seguella, Rinaldi, Marianecci, Capuano, Pesce, Annunziata and Sarnelli133).

The effects of S100 proteins on CRC progression have been investigated, with a focus on S100A4, S100A8, S100A9 and S100A8/S100A9 (Figure 3D). S100A4 plays a role in different cancer stages, including cell motility, adhesion, proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, cell survival and metastasis. It is associated with CRC progression by modulating the signalling pathways of NF-κB, MAPKs, PI3K/AKT/mTOR and EGFR (Refs. Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28, Reference Wang, Duan, Zou, Li, Yuan, Chen and Zhou32). The interaction of S100A4 with p53 may contribute to tumour growth and metastatic progression (Ref. Reference Orre, Panizza, Kaminskyy, Vernet, Gräslund, Zhivotovsky and Lehtiö114). S100A8 and S100A9, as homodimers or heterodimers, may affect tumour cell growth depending on their concentrations (Refs. Reference Duan, Wu, Ye, Wang, Yang, Zhang and Zhou95, Reference Li, Chen, Ding, Zhang, Luo, Wang and Liu101). Low concentrations of extracellular S100A8/S100A9 can promote cell growth by interacting with RAGE or TLR4 and subsequently activating MAPKs and the NF-κB signalling pathway, whereas high concentrations of S100A8/S100A9 can activate p53 transcriptional activity, presumably inducing p53-dependent cellular apoptosis (Ref. Reference Li, Chen, Ding, Zhang, Luo, Wang and Liu101). Notably, overexpression of S100A8/S100A9 in certain tissues correlates with inflammation and appears to be an initial step in the transformation of neoplastic lesions during CRC progression (Ref. Reference Peterova, Bures, Moravkova and Kohoutova79), suggesting a biological association between inflammation and neoplastic transformation in CRC.

Roles for other S100 proteins in CRC development have been demonstrated in several studies. For example, S100A2 activates the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway and upregulates glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) expression in CRC, which induces glycolytic reprogramming and consequently increases tumour proliferation (Ref. Reference Li, Chen, Zhou, Niu, Wang, Li and Gao134). S100A3 appears to play a role in the occurrence and progression of various cancers; S100A3 overexpression may be linked to tumourigenesis and progression of CRC (Ref. Reference Liu, Sun, Zhi, Lu, Gao and Zhou41). S100A6 is overexpressed in CRC tissue and may play a role in tumour promotion (Ref. Reference Duan, Wu, Zou, Wang, Ye, Li and Zhou15). S100A14 is overexpressed in colon tissue (Ref. Reference Hashida and Coffey135) and may play roles in different cellular processes, including cell growth, motility and adhesion in CRC (Ref. Reference Diamantopoulou, Mantas, Kostakis, Agrogiannis, Garoufalia, Kavantzas and Kouraklis11). Low concentrations of extracellular S100A14 are involved in cell proliferation by binding to RAGE; however, S100A14 expression is inversely correlated with CRC progression (Refs. Reference Diamantopoulou, Mantas, Kostakis, Agrogiannis, Garoufalia, Kavantzas and Kouraklis11, Reference Jin, Chen, Luo, Ding and Liu136). Notably, S100A14 expression appears to be related to the expression of S100A1, S100A13 and S100A16, which are closely mapped to the 1q21 chromosomal region (Ref. Reference Hashida and Coffey135). S100P inactivates p53 and promotes cell proliferation in CRC, contributing to cytotoxic therapy resistance (Ref. Reference Gibadulinova, Pastorek, Filipcik, Radvak, Csaderova, Vojtesek and Pastorekova137). S100P expression is also correlated with clinical staging, recurrence and lymph node metastasis (Ref. Reference Dong, Wang, Yin, Chen, Li, Lin and Jiang75). However, the specific mechanisms underlying the expression of these proteins in CRC have not been fully elucidated.

Role of S100 proteins in TME formation in CRC

S100 proteins impact not only tumour promotion but are also closely related to the formation of tumour microenvironment (TME) by activating various immune cells (e.g., macrophages, T cells, B cells, etc.), cytokines, and chemokines, further supporting the role of these proteins in tumour progression (Refs. Reference Tanigawa, Tsukamoto, Koma, Kitamura, Urakami, Shimizu and Yokozaki53, Reference Bao, Wang, Dai, Liu, Zhang, Jin and Fang138, Reference Grum-Schwensen, Klingelhöfer, Beck, Bonefeld, Hamerlik, Guldberg and Ambartsumian139). The TME is formed as sites where cancer cells are in a network of stromal cells, including inflammatory immune cells, vascular cells and fibroblasts altogether (Ref. Reference Anderson and Simon140). These proteins can affect TME formation by excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, recruitment of immune cells and angiogenesis induction (Refs. Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28, Reference Chen, Shu, Zhang, Ye, Tian and Shen30, Reference Anderson and Simon140). Among the S100 family proteins, S100A4, S100A8 and S100A9 are closely related to the TME by upregulating cytokines and chemokines and inducing immune cell infiltration in tumours (Refs. Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28, Reference Ichikawa, Williams, Wang, Vogl and Srikrishna99, Reference Bao, Wang, Dai, Liu, Zhang, Jin and Fang138, Reference Grum-Schwensen, Klingelhöfer, Beck, Bonefeld, Hamerlik, Guldberg and Ambartsumian139). These proteins can directly or indirectly activate the NF-κB signalling pathway, which is always present in the TME. In addition, these proteins may play crucial roles in the inactivation of tumour suppressors, such as TP53, which regulates cellular homeostasis and exhibits transcriptional antagonism with NF-κB. This process increases the expression of NF-κB-dependent inflammatory genes (Ref. Reference Carrà, Lingua, Maffeo, Taulli and Morotti141).

S100 proteins may also play a decisive role in immune cell infiltration in TME. For example, Hatthakarnkul et al. (Ref. Reference Hatthakarnkul, Ammar, Pennel, Officer-Jones, Cusumano, Quinn and Edwards142) found that S100A2 expression was correlated with increased infiltration of CD163 M2-like macrophages in the tumour, suggesting that S100A2 contributes to immune activation (Ref. Reference Hatthakarnkul, Ammar, Pennel, Officer-Jones, Cusumano, Quinn and Edwards142). In another study, Kazakova et al. (Ref. Reference Kazakova, Rakina, Sudarskikh, Iamshchikov, Tarasova, Tashireva and Larionova143) analysed human CRC tissues and revealed that S100A4 was expressed by stromal compartments, particularly tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) and showed a strong correlation with macrophage infiltration in CRC tumours (Ref. Reference Kazakova, Rakina, Sudarskikh, Iamshchikov, Tarasova, Tashireva and Larionova143). In addition, TAMs can be characterised by the upregulation of chemokine genes, such as IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8, and S100 genes such as S100A8/S100A9 and S100A9 in primary CRC, resulting in the recruitment and regulation of immune cells (Ref. Reference Che, Liu, Huo, Luo, Xu, He, Li, Zhou, Huang, Chen, Ni, Zhou, Liu, Li, Zhou, Mo and Li144). Notably, the increased levels of IL-6 and IL-8 in the TME can upregulate the expression of S100A8/S100A9 in tumour-infiltrated myeloid cells, the differentiation of myeloid cells into S100A8/S100A9-expressing myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) or M2 macrophages in the TME of CRC (Ref. Reference Kim, Oh, Kim, Park, Hong, Cheon and Kim145). Further studies are needed to determine the role of S100 proteins in the CRC microenvironment.

Role of S100 proteins in CRC metastasis

Metastasis is a complicated process, and different factors exert effects on the progression of metastasis (Ref. Reference Simon6). Recent studies have supported the involvement of different S100 proteins in CRC metastasis (Refs. Reference Destek and Gul45, Reference Li, Zhang, Qian, Wu, Sun, Ling and Xu52, Reference Fang, Zhang, Xu, Liu, Mo, Sun and Lan71, Reference Lin, Fang, Li, Li, Feng, Zhan and Deng146). The involvement of S100A4, S100A8 and S100A9 has been investigated in tumourigenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion and cell migration of CRC (Refs. Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28, Reference Li, Zhang, Qian, Wu, Sun, Ling and Xu52, Reference Zhang, Wei, Wang, Qin, Wang, Lu and Ma147). It is well documented that S100A4 overexpression is associated with increased metastatic potential in patients with CRC (Ref. Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28), as S100A4 knockdown limits metastasis formation in CRC xenograft mouse models (Ref. Reference Dahlmann148). This protein can induce production of cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β, which regulate the expression of transcription factors, such as Twist and Slug, that induce EMT (Ref. Reference Chattopadhyay, Ambati and Gundamaraju149). Moreover, S100A4 contributes to the recruitment of TGF-β-driven and -producing fibroblasts, leading to immune escape and tumour invasion in cancer (Ref. Reference Li, shi, Xu, Yao, Mou, yu and Li104). Extracellular S100A8 and/or S100A9 are also involved in the formation of the pre-metastatic niche by upregulating chemokine expression, such as CXC motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1) and C-C motif ligand 5 (CCL5) (Refs. Reference Chen, Shu, Zhang, Ye, Tian and Shen30, Reference Wang, Sun, Wei, Cen and DuBois150). At low concentrations, they may induce CRC cell invasion. In addition, these proteins upregulate the expression of different cytokines and may be involved in EMT formation (Refs. Reference Chen, Shu, Zhang, Ye, Tian and Shen30, Reference Duan, Wu, Ye, Wang, Yang, Zhang and Zhou95). S100A8 promotes TGF-β-induced EMT and metastasis in CRC mouse models (Ref. Reference Li, Zhang, Qian, Wu, Sun, Ling and Xu52), suggesting that S100A8 and upstream transcription factor 2 (USF2) expression is upregulated during TGF-β-induced EMT and cell migration and invasion in CRC cells.

Among other S100 proteins, S100A2 is involved in metastasis through the formation of the S100A2/ Karyopherin alpha 2 (KPNA2) cotransport complex, which promotes cell metastasis by modulating the tumour-associated nuclear transcription factor y subunit alpha (NFYA) (Ref. Reference Han, Zhang, Liao, Zhang, Qian, Hou and Zhang151). S100A6 may contribute to invasion and metastasis in CRC cells by activating MAPK pathways (Ref. Reference Duan, Wu, Zou, Wang, Ye, Li and Zhou15). S100A11 can interact with LIM and SH3 protein 1 (LASP1) and enhance its expression in CRC. The LASP1-S100A11 axis can activate of TGF-β1/SMAD pathway, which mediates EMT and CRC progression (Ref. Reference Niu, Shao, Wang, Yang, Zhang, Luo and Zhao62). S100B is overexpressed in metastatic CRC and stimulates cell growth, invasion, and migration through interaction with thioredoxin-1 (Trx-1) and β-tubulin (Ref. Reference Zuo, Zhang, Lin, Shang, Bi, Lu and Jiang152). S100P is a transcriptional target gene for the transcriptional regulator of metastasis associated in colon cancer 1 (MACC1), which is a well-known driver of metastasis formation in CRC (Refs. Reference Lin, Fang, Li, Li, Feng, Zhan and Deng146, Reference Schmid, Dahlmann, Röhrich, Kobelt, Hoffmann, Burock and Stein153). Schmid et al. (Ref. Reference Schmid, Dahlmann, Röhrich, Kobelt, Hoffmann, Burock and Stein153) reported that S100P boosts the metastatic potential of CRC cells in vitro and in vivo via MACC1 (Ref. Reference Schmid, Dahlmann, Röhrich, Kobelt, Hoffmann, Burock and Stein153). Although different studies have confirmed the role of S100 proteins in the development of metastasis in CRC, the specific functions of most S100 proteins have not yet been fully characterised.

Roles of S100 proteins in drug resistance

Drug resistance is a complex process in which malignant cells become insensitive to anticancer drugs (Ref. Reference Emran, Shahriar, Mahmud, Rahman, Abir, Siddiquee and Hassan154). S100 proteins are differentially expressed in drug-resistant tumours (Ref. Reference Hua, Zhang, Jia, Chen, Sun and Zhu155) and may be involved in drug resistance in cancers. Intracellular S100 proteins intensify drug resistance by regulating different signalling pathways involved in cancer, such as reducing Ca2+ levels, inactivating p53, promoting annexin A2 (ANXA2) phosphorylation, regulating apoptosis and autophagy, elevating the expression of drug transporters (MDR-1, MRP-1 and LRP), activating cancer stem cells (CSCs) and interacting with non-coding RNAs (Refs. Reference Gonzalez, Garrie and Turner17, Reference Hua, Zhang, Jia, Chen, Sun and Zhu155). In addition, the binding of extracellular S100 proteins to RAGE or TLR4 can activate NF-κB signalling pathways and promote EMT, and the activation of these processes plays a critical role in the induction of chemo-drug resistance (Refs. Reference Hua, Zhang, Jia, Chen, Sun and Zhu155Reference Harada, Ikeda, Kawabe, Oguri, Hashimura, Yokoi and Saegusa157).

Roles for different S100 proteins in inducing resistance in CRC cells to various chemotherapeutic drugs have been proposed. Chemotherapeutics may cause differential expression of S100 proteins; the expression levels of S100A2, S100A3, S100A4 and S100A10, notably upregulated in CRC tissues compared with healthy controls, are over 2-fold lower in 5-FU-resistant colon cancer cells (Ref. Reference Schmidt, Kalipciyan, Dornstauder, Rizovski, Steger, Sedivy and Mader158). S100A4 expression is upregulated in different drug-resistant colon cancer cells, including those resistant to methotrexate (Ref. Reference Mencía, Selga, Rico, de Almagro, Villalobos, Ramirez and Ciudad85) and cisplatin (DDP) (Ref. Reference Liu, Yang, Zhao, Chi, Wang and Sun159). Boye et al. (Ref. Reference Boye, Jacob, Frikstad, Nesland, Maelandsmo, Dahl and Flatmark160) reported that 5-FU sensitivity is not significantly correlated with S100A4 levels, since no difference in 5-FU sensitivity was observed among different groups, including overexpressed S100A4, S100A4-knockdown, and control CRC cells (Ref. Reference Boye, Jacob, Frikstad, Nesland, Maelandsmo, Dahl and Flatmark160). A strong correlation between S100A10 expression and oxaliplatin resistance was reported. Suzuki et al. (Ref. Reference Suzuki, Yamayoshi, Nishimuta and Tanigawara161) found that S100A10 in combination with ANXA2 can mediate oxaliplatin resistance in in vitro CRC models (Ref. Reference Suzuki, Yamayoshi, Nishimuta and Tanigawara161). Notably, S100A10 expression levels were not correlated with 5-FU-sensitive CRC cells, demonstrating that deregulated S100A10 expression is more specific to oxaliplatin than to 5-FU. Additionally, Fenouille et al. (Ref. Reference Fenouille, Grosso, Yunchao, Mary, Pontier-Bres, Imbert and Lagadec162) found that the expression levels of S100A10, ANXA2, and calpain 2 may be involved in irinotecan resistance, since their expression levels are significantly higher in irinotecan-resistant HT-29 CRC cells compared to irinotecan-sensitive cells (Ref. Reference Fenouille, Grosso, Yunchao, Mary, Pontier-Bres, Imbert and Lagadec162). S100P was upregulated in an oxaliplatin-resistant cell line (Ref. Reference Tang, Liu, Liu and Li163), whereas it was downregulated in a doxorubicin-resistant cell line (Ref. Reference Bertram, Palfner, Hiddemann and Kneba84). Previous studies have demonstrated that S100P interferes with the interaction between p53 and its corresponding repressor HDM2, disrupting the normal regulatory mechanisms of p53-HDM2 interaction, which may facilitate chemotherapy resistance. Further studies are needed to explore the precise roles of S100 proteins in processes involved in drug resistance.

Association of S100 proteins and molecular subtypes of CRC

Few studies have investigated the relationship between S100 proteins and different CRC subtypes. The multi-omics analyses revealed that the S100 protein expression levels could be correlated with distinct gene expression patterns in CRC. For example, Kundu et al. (Ref. Reference Kundu, Ali, Handin, Conway, Rendo, Artursson and Sjöblom164) demonstrated that the expression levels of S100A2 and S100A10 were higher in KRAS-mutated CRC cells compared to BRAF-mutated cells (Ref. Reference Kundu, Ali, Handin, Conway, Rendo, Artursson and Sjöblom164). Previous evidence has demonstrated that CMS2 and CMS3 tumours harbor high mutations in KRAS (Ref. Reference Smeby, Sveen, Merok, Danielsen, Eilertsen, Guren and Lothe165). Hence, S100A2 and S100A10 expression may be positively correlated with these CRC subtypes. S100A4 plays a critical role in the deregulation of Wnt/β-catenin pathways in CRC. Lee et al. (Ref. Reference Lee, Choi, Kim, Ji, Lee, Son and Park166) found that although β-catenin nuclear expression was increased in MSS tumours compared with MSI-H tumours, there was no significant difference between expression levels of S100A4 in MSI-H and MSS CRC papulation (Ref. Reference Lee, Choi, Kim, Ji, Lee, Son and Park166). Another study indicated that the prognostic significance of S100A4 mRNA expression does not depend on cancer type (Ref. Reference Kazakova, Rakina, Sudarskikh, Iamshchikov, Tarasova, Tashireva and Larionova143). A previous study demonstrated that the gene signature of M11 (S100B + MMP12 + CD68+ TAMs) could be associated with good prognosis in MSS (CMS2/CMS3) tumours, whereas it shows little correlation with outcomes in MSI (CMS1) CRC tumours (Ref. Reference Che, Liu, Huo, Luo, Xu, He, Li, Zhou, Huang, Chen, Ni, Zhou, Liu, Li, Zhou, Mo and Li144), demonstrating S100B may be associated with CMS2 and CMS3 subtypes. Importantly, the profile of IBD-related CRC belongs to the CMS4 tumours (Ref. Reference Rajamäki, Taira, Katainen, Välimäki, Kuosmanen, Plaketti and Aaltonen167). Accordingly, S100A8 and S100A9 are known as biomarkers for IBD and may be associated with CMS4. In addition, a single-cell RNA sequencing analysis demonstrated that S100A9+ macrophage contributes to immunosuppressive TME and ICI resistance in patients with C3 subtype MSI-H CRC, suggesting that S100A9 may be associated with CMS1 (Ref. Reference Bao, Wang, Dai, Liu, Zhang, Jin and Fang138). Future studies should investigate the functions of S100 proteins in different CRC subtypes.

S100 proteins as biomarkers for CRC

S100 proteins can be considered as potential biomarkers for different types of cancer (Refs. Reference Zhang, Zhang, Jiang and Zhang47, Reference Liao, Chen, Tsai, Wang, Chang, Wu and Chow54, Reference Mohamed, Serag, Abdelal and Elsergany70, Reference Hwang, Chai, Chen, Tsai, Lu, Yu and Wang74). Mounting evidence demonstrates that the expression of S100 proteins is altered in different stages of CRC and holds promise as a stage-specific biomarker. Zeng et al. (Ref. Reference Zeng, Zhu, Liu, Shi, Kang, Lin and Cao168) reported that the mRNA levels of S100A2, S100A3, S100A9, S100A11 and S100P were upregulated and S100B was downregulated in CRC tissues compared with normal colon mucosa (Ref. Reference Zeng, Zhu, Liu, Shi, Kang, Lin and Cao168). Hatthakarnkul et al. (Ref. Reference Hatthakarnkul, Ammar, Pennel, Officer-Jones, Cusumano, Quinn and Edwards142) demonstrated that low cytoplasmic S100A2 could exhibit a prognostic role in CRC and the relationship between S100A2 and immune infiltration in CRC (Ref. Reference Hatthakarnkul, Ammar, Pennel, Officer-Jones, Cusumano, Quinn and Edwards142). The expression level of S100A2 may be a potential biomarker in several types of cancer, such as pancreatic cancer and endometrial carcinoma (Refs. Reference Zhang, Xia, Qi, Du and Ye13, Reference Chen, Wang, Song, Xu, Ruze and Zhao37). However, further research is warranted to clarify the exact function of S100A2 in the development of CRC. S100A4 is not only introduced as a biomarker for detecting metastatic states in patients with a high risk of metastatic development, but it is also involved in mediating metastatic processes; therefore, it may be a target for the diagnosis and monitoring of CRC. Destek and Gul. (Ref. Reference Destek and Gul45) noted that the S100A4 expression in colon cancer tissue samples can be linked to tumour localisation, malignant tumour (TNM) staging, increased aggressiveness and poor survival, suggesting that S100A4 may be a prognostic marker for TNM staging and poor survival (Ref. Reference Destek and Gul45). S100A8/S100A9 may also be a biomarker for detecting CRC. Different studies have demonstrated that the S100A8 and S100A9 overexpression can be linked to lymph node metastasis in CRC and may be considered as biomarkers for CRC metastasis (Ref. Reference Moris, Spartalis, Angelou, Margonis, Papalambros, Petrou and Felekouras169). Notably, Lehmann et al. (Ref. Reference Lehmann, Trapani, Fueglistaler, Terracciano, von Flüe, Cathomas and Beglinger170) indicated that the majority of patients with CRC with T3 and T4 tumours had higher fecal S100A8/S100A9 levels than those with T1 and T2 tumours (Ref. Reference Lehmann, Trapani, Fueglistaler, Terracciano, von Flüe, Cathomas and Beglinger170). Overexpression of S100A10 may be a predictor for CRC recurrence based on its correlation with advanced-stage CRC (Ref. Reference Tantyo, Karyadi, Rasman, Salim, Devina and Sumarpo171). S100A10 overexpression is significantly correlated with oxaliplatin resistance, and this protein exhibits a specific pattern in drug resistance (Ref. Reference Suzuki, Yamayoshi, Nishimuta and Tanigawara161). Increased mRNA levels of S100A11 in the tissue from patients with advanced adenoma have been observed when compared with the healthy mucosa in those with advanced adenomatous polyps (Refs. Reference Peterova, Bures, Moravkova and Kohoutova79, Reference Melle, Ernst, Schimmel, Bleul, Mothes, Kaufmann and Von Eggeling172). S100A11 overexpression was related to poor disease-free survival (DFS) in CRC, suggesting that S100A11 expression may be involved in tumour metastasis and may be considered as a potential prognostic marker. S100A16 expression is negatively correlated with CRC prognosis because S100A16 could suppress proliferation, migration and invasion in different CRC cell models (Ref. Reference Ou, Liao, Shi, Tang, Ye, Wu and Bai72). Thus, S100A16 may also serve as a prognostic biomarker of CRC (Refs. Reference Ou, Liao, Shi, Tang, Ye, Wu and Bai72, Reference Sun, Wang, Zhang, Ning, Guan, Chen and Hua173). S100B is overexpressed in patients with liver metastases of CRC and can be used as a marker for predicting early relapse in patients with stage II and III postoperative colon cancer (Refs. Reference Hwang, Chai, Chen, Tsai, Lu, Yu and Wang74, Reference Huang, Wang, Chang, Hsiao, Wang and Lin83). S100P is overexpressed in patients with CRC and can be detected in serum and fecal samples. Higher levels of S100P in primary colorectal tumours and metastatic lesions compared with normal tissue have been previously reported in CRC (Refs. Reference Schmid, Dahlmann, Röhrich, Kobelt, Hoffmann, Burock and Stein153, Reference Wang, Zhang, Lin, Qiu, Wu, Wu and Lu174). These studies suggest that S100P may be considered as a potential prognostic biomarker of metastasis-free survival in patients with CRC and a potential prognostic biomarker for primary tumours. However, other studies have not supported this finding, as there was no significant difference in the mRNA levels of S100P between different groups, including advanced adenoma patients, non-advanced adenoma patients, and controls (Ref. Reference Peterova, Bures, Moravkova and Kohoutova79). Further studies are needed to select S100 proteins as potential biomarkers for CRC.

S100 proteins as therapeutic targets for CRC

Currently, new targeted therapies have been introduced for cancer therapy, including natural and synthetic-molecule inhibitors, neutralising antibodies, peptide inhibitors, and microRNA (miRNA) mimics, some of which have already been approved or are undergoing clinical trials (Refs. Reference Kumar, Gautam, Sandhu, Rawat, Sharma and Saha195, Reference Xie, Chen and Fang196). Given the potential role of S100 proteins in the development of CRC, if these can be validated, they would serve as therapeutic targets to prevent CRC progression. To date, several studies have focused on the blockade of different S100 proteins in cancer states, most of which are limited to in vitro studies, and some data are controversial (Ref. Reference Bresnick197). Most inhibitors introduced for S100 proteins in cancer therapy are presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Overview of potential S100 proteins-targeting inhibitors for treating GI tract cancers

Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; CRC, colorectal cancer, EC, esophageal cancer; EMT, epithelial mesenchymal transition; TFP, trifluoperazine; GC, gastric cancer; GI tract, gastrointestinal tract; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; KPNA2, karyopherin alpha 2,KRAS, kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene, mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin, PDAC, pancreatic adenocarcinoma; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; RAGE, advanced glycation end products; TCF, T-cell factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; Wnt, wingless-related integration site.

Natural and synthetic molecules

Natural molecule inhibitors are classified as low-molecular-weight organic compounds that target important cancer-promoting proteins (Ref. Reference Li and Kang198). The inhibition of S100 proteins by small molecules has been previously reported. For CRC, it is documented that the interaction between S100A2 and KPNA2 mediates the transportation of the tumour-associated transcription factor NFYA, inhibits E-cadherin transcriptional activity, and subsequently facilitates metastasis. Han et al. reported that the use of a natural molecule, i.e., delanzomib, inhibits the S100A2-KPNA2 interaction and prevents CRC metastasis (Ref. Reference Han, Zhang, Liao, Zhang, Qian, Hou and Zhang151). Accordingly, delanzomib is a promising treatment option for preventing the progression of CRC.

In recent years, different synthetic molecules with inhibitory activity against S100A4 have been introduced to suppress cancer progression. For example, niclosamide, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic drug, has shown promising results for the treatment of various cancers and is being examined in clinical trials for different solid tumours (Refs. Reference Lee, Chen, Hsu and Lin176Reference Kortüm, Radhakrishnan, Zincke, Sachse, Burock, Keilholz and Stein179). Niclosamide modulates β-catenin signalling and induces β-catenin degradation by inhibiting S100A4 transcription (Ref. Reference Stein, Arlt, Smith, Sack, Herrmann, Walther and Schlag108). The safety and efficacy of niclosamide for patients with metastatic CRC are currently being evaluated in a phase II clinical trial (Ref. Reference Burock, Daum, Keilholz, Neumann, Walther and Stein199). Kortum et al. (Ref. Reference Kortüm, Radhakrishnan, Zincke, Sachse, Burock, Keilholz and Stein179) showed that the inhibition of S100A4 by niclosamide reduced cell proliferation, motility and migration in vitro, supporting the therapeutic value of targeting S100A4 as an anti-metastatic approach for CRC (Ref. Reference Kortüm, Radhakrishnan, Zincke, Sachse, Burock, Keilholz and Stein179). Another S100A4 inhibitor, sulindac, an FDA-approved nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), significantly downregulated the mRNA and protein levels of β-catenin and S100A4 in tumours and reduced tumour growth and metastasis formation in an animal model compared with controls. Additionally, sulindac treatment reduced β-catenin and S100A4 levels in liver metastases (Ref. Reference Stein, Arlt, Smith, Sack, Herrmann, Walther and Schlag108). Calcimycin is an antibiotic drug that can inhibit the activity of S100A4. Sack et al. (Ref. Reference Sack, Walther, Scudiero, Selby, Aumann, Lemos and Stein107) found that calcimycin dysregulated the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and restricted cell motility and metastasis induced by S100A4 in colon cancer cells (Ref. Reference Sack, Walther, Scudiero, Selby, Aumann, Lemos and Stein107). These findings support S100A4 targeting as an effective approach for inhibiting the Wnt signalling pathway and demonstrate anti-tumour and anti-metastatic effects (Ref. Reference Schmid, Dahlmann, Röhrich, Kobelt, Hoffmann, Burock and Stein153). Trifluoperazine (TFP) is an FDA-approved antipsychotic drug and acts as an S100 protein inhibitor that disrupts the S100A4/myosin-IIA interaction. Qian et al. (Ref. Reference Qian, Sun, Zhou, Ge, Meng and Li184) demonstrated that the administration of TFP reduced tumour growth and proliferation and inhibited the EMT phenotype in a CRC mouse model, suggesting the potential antitumour activity of TFP in CRC (Ref. Reference Qian, Sun, Zhou, Ge, Meng and Li184).

Paquinimod and tasquinimod have been introduced as S100A8/S100A9 inhibitors that suppress RAGE and TLR4 signalling, respectively (Refs. Reference Talley, Valiauga, Anderson, Cannon, Choudhry and Campbell200, Reference Fan, Satilmis, Vandewalle, Verheye, Vlummens, Maes and De Veirman201). A single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed the involvement of S100A9+ macrophages in patients with MSI-H (C3 subtype) that show resistance to anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibody (Ref. Reference Bao, Wang, Dai, Liu, Zhang, Jin and Fang138). Interestingly, administration of PD-1 blockade and tasquinimod reversed dysfunctional immunotherapy response and enhanced immunotherapy efficacy by depleting S100A9+ macrophages in vivo (Ref. Reference Bao, Wang, Dai, Liu, Zhang, Jin and Fang138). These results support the potential value of targeting S100A9 as a therapeutic strategy for treating patients with PD-1-resistant MSI-H CRC.

Inhibition of S100B by pentamidine (PTM) disrupts the S100B/p53 interaction (Ref. Reference Katte, Dowarha, Chou and Yu202), which promotes the expression of wtp53 and recovers p53-dependent cellular apoptosis in an in vitro colon cancer model (Ref. Reference Seguella, Rinaldi, Marianecci, Capuano, Pesce, Annunziata and Sarnelli133). Inhibition of S100P by cromolyn suppressed cell proliferation in CRC cell lines and attenuated tumour morphometric outcomes in an in vivo model of CRC by reducing tumour volume and weight compared with the control group. This suggests that the blockade of S00P by cromolyn may be a relevant anticancer approach for future therapeutic development (Ref. Reference Aliabadi, Haghshenas, Kiani, Panjehshahin and Erfani192). However, this inhibitor binds other S100 proteins, such as S100A1, S10012 and S100A13 due to the high structural similarity of these proteins, and the consequences of the lack of S100 protein specificity have not been investigated.

Neutralising antibodies

Neutralising anti-S100 antibodies have been introduced as novel therapeutic strategies for modulating different cellular processes, with S100A4, S100A8, S100A9 and S100P targeting by specific antibodies having been studied (Refs. Reference Raeisi, Azimirad, Schiopu, Zarnani, Asadzadeh Aghdaei, Abdemohamadi and Yadegar20, Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28, Reference Zhang, Wei, Wang, Qin, Wang, Lu and Ma147, Reference Dakhel, Padilla, Adan, Masa, Martinez, Roque and Hernández203). However, few studies have investigated the application of anti-S100 antibodies against CRC. For instance, Zhang et al. (Ref. Reference Zhang, Wei, Wang, Qin, Wang, Lu and Ma147) used an anti-S100A9 antibody to suppress colitis-associated colon cancer in mice. This study indicated that treatment of CRC mouse models with anti-S100A9 antibody may suppress key pathways involved in CRC development, such as the Wnt and PI3K/AKT signalling pathways. It has been suggested that an anti-S100A9 antibody could decrease the risk of CRC development (Ref. Reference Zhang, Wei, Wang, Qin, Wang, Lu and Ma147). Additionally, Zhang et al. (Ref. Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28) reported that an anti-S100A4 neutralising antibody reduced tumour incidence in a mouse model, suggesting that it may serve as an approach for the prevention and treatment of colon cancer (Ref. Reference Zhang, Hou, Gu, Tian, Yuan, Jia and Chen28).

Peptide inhibitors

In addition to antibodies, specific S100-blocking peptides have been introduced in an attempt to develop cancer therapies. For example, Deguchi et al. (Ref. Reference Deguchi, Watanabe-Takahashi, Mishima, Omori, Ohto, Arashiki and Maru189) generated a multivalent peptide to inhibit the activity of S100A8 (divalent peptide3A5). Treatment of human colorectal tumour SW480 cells with this peptide diminished tumour progression and metastasis by preventing the activation of the TLR4-dependent pathway and suppressing VEGF production. Interestingly, administration of this peptide in a CRC mouse model improved the efficacy of bevacizumab (an anti-VEGF antibody) and attenuated lung metastasis (Ref. Reference Deguchi, Watanabe-Takahashi, Mishima, Omori, Ohto, Arashiki and Maru189). Therefore, this peptide may be a treatment option for aggressive cancer. In another study, the application of an S100A8/S100A9-targeting specific peptide suppressed tumour growth and downregulated the expression of EMT-associated markers in CRC mouse models (Ref. Reference Cho, Mun, Kim, Ham, Gil and Yang190).

MicroRNA (miRNA) mimics

miRNAs belong to a class of small RNA molecules (approximately 18–24 nucleotides) that play critical roles in the regulation of different signalling pathways related to cancers, and miRNA mimics have been introduced as a pharmaceutical strategy for treating cancers (Ref. Reference Menon, Abd-Aziz, Khalid, Poh and Naidu204). Furthermore, miRNAs are involved in the expression of different S100 proteins (Refs. Reference Chengling, Yulin, Xiaoyu, Xingchen, Sen, Ziming and Xianming187, Reference Mudduluru, Ilm, Fuchs and Stein205, Reference Xiao, Zhao, Du, Chen and Zhou206). Several studies have suggested that miRNA mimics may serve as effective agents for blocking S100 expression, most of which focus on targeting S100A4 as an effective strategy for preventing CRC. Two miRNAs, i.e., miR-187-3p and miR-149-3p, have been shown to decrease S100A4 expression and inhibit tumour cell proliferation, invasion and migration by blocking S100A4 (Refs. Reference Xiao, Zhao, Du, Chen and Zhou206, Reference Yang, Du, Xu, Xi and Li207). In addition, the miR-149 − 3p–S100A4–p53 axis contributes to induced drug resistance, since lower expression of miR-149 − 3p was observed in DDP-resistant colon cancer cells than in DDP-sensitive cells (Ref. Reference Liu, Yang, Zhao, Chi, Wang and Sun159).

In CRC cells, miR-325-3p/S100A4, miR-520c-3p/S100A4 and miR-296/S100A4 play important roles in carcinogenesis. Chengling et al. (Ref. Reference Chengling, Yulin, Xiaoyu, Xingchen, Sen, Ziming and Xianming187) indicated that miR-325-3p can target S100A4, and overexpression of miR-325-3p efficiently attenuated bone resorption in bone metastasis of CRC (Ref. Reference Chengling, Yulin, Xiaoyu, Xingchen, Sen, Ziming and Xianming187). He et al. (Ref. Reference He, Yu, Luo, Li, Li, Li and Wang188) found that miR-296 inhibited EMT, migration and invasion of CRC cells by mediating S100A4, demonstrating that miR-296 can be a potential target against CRC metastasis (Ref. Reference He, Yu, Luo, Li, Li, Li and Wang188). There are no data available on the application of miR-520c-3p to suppress S100A4 expression, but Mudduluru et al. (Ref. Reference Mudduluru, Ilm, Fuchs and Stein205) demonstrated that epigenetic silencing of miR-520c induced the expression of S100A4 and subsequently promoted CRC progression, suggesting that miR-520c regulated S100A4 expression (Ref. Reference Mudduluru, Ilm, Fuchs and Stein205). Although miRNAs have shown high effectiveness in targeting S100 proteins, systems with high efficacy for the miRNA delivery needs to be explored to reach an effective therapy in a clinical context. Further studies are needed to explore an effective approach for targeting S100 proteins with high efficacy for therapeutic interventions in CRC.

Discussion

S100 proteins play critical roles in the development of CRC and can be considered as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for CRC management. Different S100 proteins, including S100A4, S100A8/S100A9, S100A10 and S100B, have shown promising results as biomarkers for CRC monitoring or assessing specific drug resistance (Refs. Reference Hwang, Chai, Chen, Tsai, Lu, Yu and Wang74, Reference Suzuki, Yamayoshi, Nishimuta and Tanigawara161, Reference Moris, Spartalis, Angelou, Margonis, Papalambros, Petrou and Felekouras169). Notably, most tests introduced for detecting S100 proteins are based on ELISA methods, and numerous commercial kits for measuring S100 proteins, such as S100A8/S100A9 and S100B, in biological fluids are already available, providing a non-invasive method for disease monitoring. Nonetheless, few studies have investigated the amount of S100 proteins in serum and fecal samples of patients with CRC, which are mostly limited by insufficient sample size. In addition, the precise expression level of these proteins in different CRC populations is not fully understood; thus, more comprehensive studies are needed to elucidate the exact relationship between S100 proteins in different CRC subtypes.

S100 proteins also show potential as therapeutic targets for CRC, with S100A4 showing the most promising results in CRC treatment (Refs. Reference Grum-Schwensen, Klingelhöfer, Beck, Bonefeld, Hamerlik, Guldberg and Ambartsumian139, Reference He, Yu, Luo, Li, Li, Li and Wang188, Reference Burock, Daum, Keilholz, Neumann, Walther and Stein199). Among the different S100A4 inhibitors, niclosamide has shown the most promise for suppressing the development of different cancers (Ref. Reference Burock, Daum, Keilholz, Neumann, Walther and Stein199). Further research is required to clarify the efficacy of this inhibitor for treating CRC. It should be noted that the efficacy of targeting S100 proteins as a therapeutic approach may be limited due to cross-reactivity between different S100 proteins, their long half-life and insufficient steady-state protein levels (Ref. Reference Bresnick197). In the future, further efforts should focus on improving the specificity and pharmacological effects of S100 inhibitors (e.g., biological half-life and affinity). In addition, evidence of the precise role of other S100 proteins in CRC progression is limited; therefore, a better understanding of the roles of extracellular and intracellular S100 proteins can help identify new therapeutic targets. The application of new technologies and bioinformatics tools can help reveal the functional roles of S100 proteins in cellular processes and signalling cascades in multiple cell types and provide a better understanding of the importance of S100 proteins in CRC clinical diagnosis, prevention and treatment.

The investigation of the precise roles of S100 in different CMSs of CRC may provide new insights into the predation and treatment of patients with CRC, as CMSs have shown different molecular features, prognosis, and drug responses (Ref. Reference Sveen, Bruun, Eide, Eilertsen, Ramirez, Murumägi and Lothe208). In this regard, investigating the importance of specific S100 proteins based on cancer grades and subtypes may provide insights into better stratifying patients with distinct TME properties and exploring personalised therapeutics. For example, S100 proteins, such as S100A8/S100A9, are known as biomarkers for inflammatory diseases and may be associated with CMS4 tumours (Ref. Reference Rajamäki, Taira, Katainen, Välimäki, Kuosmanen, Plaketti and Aaltonen167). This CRC subtype is associated with the poorest prognosis and worse overall and relapse-free survival rate than the other three subtypes; thus, S100A8/S100A9 may be a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target for CRC patients with CMS4 tumours. Therefore, future studies should be conducted to investigate both the genetic profile and immunomodulatory functions of S100 proteins in patients with CRC.

In conclusion, S100 proteins, especially S100A4, S100A8, S100A9, S100B, S100A8/S100A9 and S100A10, can play critical roles in CRC initiation, progression and drug resistance by activating cancer-signalling pathways. Dysregulated expression of these proteins in CRC tissues can be considered as a potential biomarker for disease monitoring and specific drug resistance and developing therapeutic agents for CRC management. However, most recent studies on the importance of S100 proteins in CRC progression have focused on basic and pre-clinical research. Further efforts are needed to explore the precise role of these proteins, particularly in different CMSs of CRC and assess their potential for developing new diagnostics and personalised therapeutics targeting specific CRC and drug-resistant tumours.

Abbreviations

AKT

protein kinase B

ANXA2

annexin A2

ANXA6

annexin A6

AP-1

activator protein 1

Bax

Bcl-2-associated protein x

CCL5

C-C motif ligand 5

CIN

chromosomal instability

CMS

consensus molecular subtypes

c-myc

cellular myelocytomatosis oncogene

CRC

colorectal cancer

CRCSC

colorectal cancer subtyping consortium

CSCs

cancer stem cells

CXCL1

CXC motif chemokine ligand 1

DDP

cisplatin

DFS

disease-free survival

EC

esophageal cancer

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

ELISA

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

EMT

epithelial mesenchymal transition

ERK

extracellular signalling-related kinase

FGF

fibroblast growth factor

FGFR

fibroblast growth factor receptor

GC

gastric cancer

GI tract

gastrointestinal tract

GLUT1

glucose transporter 1

GPCR

G protein coupled receptor

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

HER2

human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

IBD

inflammatory bowel disease

IL

interleukin

JNK

c-Jun N-terminal kinase

KPNA2

karyopherin alpha 2

KRAS

kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue

LASP1

LIM and SH3 protein 1

MACC1

metastasis associated in colon cancer 1

MAPK

mitogen-activated protein kinase

MDR

multiple drug resistance

MEK

mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase

miRNA

microRNA

MMP

matrix metalloproteinase

MMR

mismatch repair

MSI-H

microsatellite instability-high

MSS

microsatellite stability biomarker

mTOR

mammalian target of rapamycin

MyD88

myeloid differentiation primary response protein 88

NFYA

nuclear transcription factor y subunit alpha

NF-κB

nuclear factor κB

PD 1

programmed death 1

PDAC

pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PDSs

pathway-derived subtypes

PI3K

phosphatidyl inositol 3 phosphate

PTM

pentamidine

RAF

rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma

RAGE

receptor for advanced glycation end products

RARα

retinoic acid receptor alpha

RNS

reactive nitrogen species

ROS

reactive oxygen species

SCCOC

squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity

SCNAs

somatic copy number alterations

SMAD

suppressor of mothers against decapentaplegic

SR

scavenger receptor

TAMs

tumour-associated macrophages

TCF/LEF

T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor

TFP

trifluoperazine

TGF-β

transforming growth factor-β

TGF-βR

transforming growth factor-β receptor

TLR4

toll-like receptor 4

TME

tumour microenvironment

TNF-α

tumour necrosis factor alpha

TNM

malignant tumours

Trx-1

thioredoxin-1

USF2

upstream transcription factor 2

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

Wnt

wingless-related integration site

Author’s contribution

H.R. reviewed the literature and drafted the manuscript; L.R., A.S., N.F., Z,S., M.R.Z., and E.N.M. reviewed and edited the manuscript; H.R. and E.N.M. critically revised the manuscript. All authors read the final version of the manuscript and approved the list of authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Prof. Dr. Walter J. Chazin for valuable comments and critically reviewing the draft of manuscript.

Funding statement

This study was financially supported by a research grant (no. RIGLD 1300, IR.SBMU.RIGLD.REC.1403.042) from the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

Hossain, MS, Karuniawati, H, Jairoun, AA, Urbi, Z, Ooi, DJ, John, A and Hadi, MA (2022) Colorectal cancer: A review of carcinogenesis, global epidemiology, current challenges, risk factors, preventive and treatment strategies. Cancers (Basel) 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071732.Google Scholar
Bray, F, Ferlay, J, Soerjomataram, I, Siegel, RL, Torre, LA and Jemal, A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians 68(6), 394424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.Google Scholar
Keum, N and Giovannucci, E (2019) Global burden of colorectal cancer: Emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology 16(12), 713732. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8.Google Scholar
Chen, X, Jansen, L, Guo, F, Hoffmeister, M, Chang-Claude, J and Brenner, H (2021) Smoking, genetic predisposition, and colorectal cancer risk. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology 12(3), e00317. https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000317.Google Scholar
Soltani, G, Poursheikhani, A, Yassi, M, Hayatbakhsh, A, Kerachian, M and Kerachian, MA (2019) Obesity, diabetes and the risk of colorectal adenoma and cancer. MC Endocr Disord 19(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-019-0444-6.Google Scholar
Simon, K (2016) Colorectal cancer development and advances in screening. Clinical Interventions in Aging 11, 967976. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s109285.Google Scholar
de Visser, KE and Joyce, JA (2023) The evolving tumor microenvironment: From cancer initiation to metastatic outgrowth. Cancer Cell 41(3), 374403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.016.Google Scholar
Guinney, J, Dienstmann, R, Wang, X, de Reyniès, A, Schlicker, A, Soneson, C and Tejpar, S (2015) The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nature Medicine 21(11), 13501356. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3967.Google Scholar
Singh, MP, Rai, S, Pandey, A, Singh, NK and Srivastava, S (2021) Molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer: An emerging therapeutic opportunity for personalized medicine. Genes Dis 8(2), 133145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2019.10.013.Google Scholar
Malla, SB, Byrne, RM, Lafarge, MW, Corry, SM, Fisher, NC, Tsantoulis, PK and Consortium, SC (2024) Pathway level subtyping identifies a slow-cycling biological phenotype associated with poor clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer. Nature Genetics 56(3), 458472. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01654-5.Google Scholar
Diamantopoulou, A., Mantas, D., Kostakis, I. D., Agrogiannis, G., Garoufalia, Z., Kavantzas, N., & Kouraklis, G. (2020). A clinicopathological analysis of S100A14 expression in colorectal cancer. in vivo, 34(1), 321330. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11777.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y, Zhang, TB and Wang, Q (2013) Clinical significance of altered S100A2 expression in gastric cancer. Oncology Reports 29(4), 15561562. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2236.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q, Xia, T, Qi, C, Du, J and Ye, C (2022) High expression of S100A2 predicts poor prognosis in patients with endometrial carcinoma. BMC Cancer 22(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09180-5.Google Scholar
Xuan, X, Li, Q, Zhang, Z, Du, Y and Liu, P (2014) Increased expression levels of S100A4 associated with hypoxia-induced invasion and metastasis in esophageal squamous cell cancer. Tumour Biology 35(12), 1253512543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2573-x.Google Scholar
Duan, L, Wu, R, Zou, Z, Wang, H, Ye, L, Li, H and Zhou, L (2014) S100A6 stimulates proliferation and migration of colorectal carcinoma cells through activation of the MAPK pathways. International Journal of Oncology 44(3), 781790. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2013.2231.Google Scholar
Singh, P and Ali, SA (2022) Multifunctional role of S100 protein family in the immune system: An update. Cells 11(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11152274.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, LL, Garrie, K and Turner, MD (2020) Role of S100 proteins in health and disease. Biochim Biophy. Acta Mol Cell Res 1867(6), 118677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118677.Google Scholar
Hou, S, Tian, T, Qi, D, Sun, K, Yuan, Q, Wang, Z and Zhang, J (2018) S100A4 promotes lung tumor development through β-catenin pathway-mediated autophagy inhibition. Cell Death & Disease 9(3), 277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-018-0319-1.Google Scholar
Kilańczyk, E, Graczyk, A, Ostrowska, H, Kasacka, I, Leśniak, W and Filipek, A (2012) S100A6 is transcriptionally regulated by β-catenin and interacts with a novel target, Lamin a/C, in colorectal cancer cells. Cell Calcium 51(6), 470477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2012.04.005.Google Scholar
Raeisi, H, Azimirad, M, Schiopu, A, Zarnani, AH, Asadzadeh Aghdaei, H, Abdemohamadi, E and Yadegar, A (2025) Development of novel neutralizing single-chain fragment variable antibodies against S100A8. Scientific Reports 15(1), 12618. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96211-3.Google Scholar
Kwon, CH, Moon, HJ, Park, HJ, Choi, JH and Park, DY (2013) S100A8 and S100A9 promotes invasion and migration through p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent NF-κB activation in gastric cancer cells. Molecular Cell 35(3), 226234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-013-2269-x.Google Scholar
Donato, R (2001) S100: A multigenic family of calcium-modulated proteins of the EF-hand type with intracellular and extracellular functional roles. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 33(7), 637668. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00046-2.Google Scholar
Leśniak, W and Graczyk-Jarzynka, A (2015) The S100 proteins in epidermis: Topology and function. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1850(12), 25632572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.09.015.Google Scholar
Chang, MH, Chou, JW, Chen, SM, Tsai, MC, Sun, YS, Lin, CC and Lin, CP (2014) Faecal calprotectin as a novel biomarker for differentiating between inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome. Molecular Medicine Reports 10(1), 522526. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2180.Google Scholar
Spratt, DE, Barber, KR, Marlatt, NM, Ngo, V, Macklin, JA, Xiao, Y and Shaw, GS (2019) A subset of calcium-binding S100 proteins show preferential heterodimerization. The FEBS Journal 286(10), 18591876. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.14775.Google Scholar
Yu, J, Lu, Y, Li, Y, Xiao, L, Xing, Y, Li, Y and Wu, L (2015) Role of S100A1 in hypoxia-induced inflammatory response in cardiomyocytes via TLR4/ROS/NF-κB pathway. The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 67(9), 12401250. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphp.12415.Google Scholar
Jingjing, H, Tongqian, W, Shirong, Y, Lan, M, Jing, L, Shihui, M and Fang, Y (2024) S100A4 promotes experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by impacting microglial inflammation through TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway. International Immunopharmacology 142 (Pt A), 112849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112849.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Hou, S, Gu, J, Tian, T, Yuan, Q, Jia, J and Chen, Z (2018) S100A4 promotes colon inflammation and colitis-associated colon tumorigenesis. Oncoimmunology 7(8), e1461301. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402x.2018.1461301.Google Scholar
Simard, JC, Cesaro, A, Chapeton-Montes, J, Tardif, M, Antoine, F, Girard, D and Tessier, PA (2013) S100A8 and S100A9 induce cytokine expression and regulate the NLRP3 inflammasome via ROS-dependent activation of NF-κB(1.). PLoS One 8(8), e72138. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072138.Google Scholar
Chen, L, Shu, P, Zhang, X, Ye, S, Tian, L, Shen, S, et al. (2024) S100A8-mediated inflammatory Signaling drives colorectal cancer progression via the CXCL5/CXCR2 Axis. Journal of Cancer 15(11), 34523465. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.92588.Google Scholar
Piazza, O, Leggiero, E, De Benedictis, G, Pastore, L, Salvatore, F, Tufano, R and De Robertis, E (2013) S100B induces the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in alveolar type I-like cells. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology 26(2), 383391. https://doi.org/10.1177/039463201302600211.Google Scholar
Wang, H, Duan, L, Zou, Z, Li, H, Yuan, S, Chen, X and Zhou, L (2014) Activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR/p70S6K pathway is involved in S100A4-induced viability and migration in colorectal cancer cells. International Journal of Medical Sciences 11(8), 841849. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.8128.Google Scholar
Naz, S, Bashir, M, Ranganathan, P, Bodapati, P, Santosh, V and Kondaiah, P (2014) Protumorigenic actions of S100A2 involve regulation of PI3/Akt signaling and functional interaction with Smad3. Carcinogenesis 35(1), 1423. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgt287.Google Scholar
Xiao, M, Li, T, Ji, Y, Jiang, F, Ni, W, Zhu, J and Ni, R (2018) S100A11 promotes human pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cell proliferation and is involved in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Oncology Letters 15(1), 175182. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7295.Google Scholar
Guo, Q, Wang, J, Cao, Z, Tang, Y, Feng, C and Huang, F (2018) Interaction of S100A1 with LATS1 promotes cell growth through regulation of the hippo pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. International Journal of Oncology 53(2), 592602. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2018.4431.Google Scholar
Imazawa, M, Hibi, K, Fujitake, S, Kodera, Y, Ito, K, Akiyama, S and Nakao, A (2005) S100A2 overexpression is frequently observed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Research 25(2b), 12471250.Google Scholar
Chen, Y, Wang, C, Song, J, Xu, R, Ruze, R and Zhao, Y (2021) S100A2 is a prognostic biomarker involved in immune infiltration and predict immunotherapy response in pancreatic cancer. Frontiers in Immunology 12, 758004. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.758004.Google Scholar
Masuda, T, Ishikawa, T, Mogushi, K, Okazaki, S, Ishiguro, M, Iida, S and Sugihara, K (2016) Overexpression of the S100A2 protein as a prognostic marker for patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer. International Journal of Oncology 48(3), 975982. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2016.3329.Google Scholar
Yan, J, Huang, YJ, Huang, QY, Liu, PX and Wang, CS (2022) Transcriptional activation of S100A2 expression by HIF-1α via binding to the hypomethylated hypoxia response elements in HCC cells. Molecular Carcinogenesis 61(5), 494507. https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.23393.Google Scholar
Liu, J, Li, X, Dong, G-L, Zhang, H-W, Chen, D-L, Du, J-J and Wang, W-Z (2008) In silico analysis and verification of S100 gene expression in gastric cancer. BMC Cancer 8(1), 261. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-261.Google Scholar
Liu, B, Sun, WY, Zhi, CY, Lu, TC, Gao, HM, Zhou, JH, et al. (2013) Role of S100A3 in human colorectal cancer and the anticancer effect of cantharidinate. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 6(6), 14991503. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1344.Google Scholar
Tao, R, Wang, ZF, Qiu, W, He, YF, Yan, WQ, Sun, WY and Li, HJ (2017) Role of S100A3 in human hepatocellular carcinoma and the anticancer effect of sodium cantharidinate. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 13(6), 28122818. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.4294.Google Scholar
Che, P, Yang, Y, Han, X, Hu, M, Sellers, JC, Londono-Joshi, AI and Ding, Q (2015) S100A4 promotes pancreatic cancer progression through a dual signaling pathway mediated by Src and focal adhesion kinase. Scientific Reports 5, 8453. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08453.Google Scholar
Treese, C, Hartl, K, Pötzsch, M, Dahlmann, M, von Winterfeld, M, Berg, E and Stein, U (2022) S100A4 is a strong negative prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in adenocarcinoma of the stomach and esophagus. Cells 11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11061056.Google Scholar
Destek, S and Gul, VO (2018) S100A4 may be a good prognostic marker and a therapeutic target for colon cancer. Journal of Oncology 2018, 1828791. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1828791.Google Scholar
Li, Y, Wang, J, Song, K, Liu, S, Zhang, H, Wang, F and Zhang, J (2020) S100A4 promotes hepatocellular carcinogenesis by intensifying fibrosis-associated cancer cell stemness. Oncoimmunology 9(1), 1725355. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402x.2020.1725355.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Zhang, K, Jiang, X and Zhang, J (2014) S100A6 as a potential serum prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in gastric cancer. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 59(9), 21362144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3137-z.Google Scholar
Song, D, Xu, B, Shi, D, Li, S and Cai, Y (2020) S100A6 promotes proliferation and migration of HepG2 cells via increased ubiquitin-dependent degradation of p53. Open Med (Wars) 15(1), 317326. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2020-0101.Google Scholar
Ohuchida, K, Mizumoto, K, Ishikawa, N, Fujii, K, Konomi, H, Nagai, E and Tanaka, M (2005) The role of S100A6 in pancreatic cancer development and its clinical implication as a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target. Clinical Cancer Research 11(21), 77857793. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-0714.Google Scholar
Lu, Z, Zheng, S, Liu, C, Wang, X, Zhang, G, Wang, F and He, J (2021) S100A7 as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma promotes M2 macrophage infiltration and angiogenesis. Clinical and Translational Medicine 11(7), e459. https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.459.Google Scholar
Liu, Y, Bunston, C, Hodson, N, Resaul, J, Sun, PH, Cai, S and Ye, L (2017) Psoriasin promotes invasion, aggregation and survival of pancreatic cancer cells; association with disease progression. International Journal of Oncology 50(5), 14911500. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.3953.Google Scholar
Li, S, Zhang, J, Qian, S, Wu, X, Sun, L, Ling, T and Xu, F (2021) S100A8 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis under TGF-β/USF2 axis in colorectal cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond) 41(2), 154170. https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12130.Google Scholar
Tanigawa, K, Tsukamoto, S, Koma, YI, Kitamura, Y, Urakami, S, Shimizu, M and Yokozaki, H (2022) S100A8/A9 induced by interaction with macrophages in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma promotes the migration and invasion of cancer cells via Akt and p38 MAPK pathways. The American Journal of Pathology 192(3), 536552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.12.002.Google Scholar
Liao, WC, Chen, CT, Tsai, YS, Wang, XY, Chang, YT, Wu, MS and Chow, LP (2023) S100A8, S100A9 and S100A8/A9 heterodimer as novel cachexigenic factors for pancreatic cancer-induced cachexia. BMC Cancer 23(1), 513. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11009-8.Google Scholar
Blad, N, Palmqvist, R and Karling, P (2022) Pre-diagnostic faecal calprotectin levels in patients with colorectal cancer: A retrospective study. BMC Cancer 22(1), 315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09440-4.Google Scholar
Kung, PJ, Lai, TY, Cao, J, Hsu, LC, Chiang, TC, Ou-Yang, P and Lee, CY (2022) The role of S100A9 in the interaction between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells and stromal cells. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 71(3), 705718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-03026-y.Google Scholar
Li, Y, Li, XY, Li, LX, Zhou, RC, Sikong, Y, Gu, X and Zuo, XL (2020) S100A10 accelerates aerobic glycolysis and malignant growth by activating mTOR-signaling pathway in gastric cancer. Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology 8, 559486. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.559486.Google Scholar
Bydoun, M, Sterea, A, Liptay, H, Uzans, A, Huang, WY, Rodrigues, GJ and Waisman, DM (2018) S100A10, a novel biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Molecular Oncology 12(11), 18951916. https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.12356.Google Scholar
Shang, J, Zhang, Z, Song, W, Zhou, B, Zhang, Y, Li, G and Qiu, S (2013) S100A10 as a novel biomarker in colorectal cancer. Tumor Biology 34(6), 37853790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0962-1.Google Scholar
Wang, X, Huang, H, Sze, KM, Wang, J, Tian, L, Lu, J and Ng, IO (2023) S100A10 promotes HCC development and progression via transfer in extracellular vesicles and regulating their protein cargos. Gut 72(7), 13701384. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327998.Google Scholar
Cui, Y, Li, L, Li, Z, Yin, J, Lane, J, Ji, J and Jiang, WG (2021) Dual effects of targeting S100A11 on suppressing cellular metastatic properties and sensitizing drug response in gastric cancer. Cancer Cell International 21(1), 243. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01949-1.Google Scholar
Niu, Y, Shao, Z, Wang, H, Yang, J, Zhang, F, Luo, Y and Zhao, L (2016) LASP1-S100A11 axis promotes colorectal cancer aggressiveness by modulating TGFβ/Smad signaling. Scientific Reports 6, 26112. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26112.Google Scholar
Zheng, M, Meng, H, Li, Y, Shi, J, Han, Y, Zhao, C and Wang, Y (2023) S100A11 promotes metastasis via AKT and ERK signaling pathways and has a diagnostic role in hepatocellular carcinoma. International Journal of Medical Sciences 20(3), 318328. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.80503.Google Scholar
Zeng, X, Guo, H, Liu, Z, Qin, Z, Cong, Y, Ren, N, Zhang, N and Zhang, N (2022) S100A11 activates the pentose phosphate pathway to induce malignant biological behaviour of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cell Death & Disease 13(6), 568. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-05004-3.Google Scholar
Li, D, Zeng, Z, Yu, T, Qin, J, Wu, J, Song, JC and Yuan, JP (2016) Expression and clinical implication of S100A12 in gastric carcinoma. Tumour Biology 37(5), 65516559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-4460-5.Google Scholar
Xia, L, Guo, X, Lu, D, Jiang, Y, Liang, X, Shen, Y and Zhang, W (2025) S100A13-driven interaction between pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes tumor progression through calcium signaling. Cell Communication and Signaling: CCS 23(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-025-02049-7.Google Scholar
Zhu, M, Wang, H, Cui, J, Li, W, An, G, Pan, Y and Lu, Y (2017) Calcium-binding protein S100A14 induces differentiation and suppresses metastasis in gastric cancer. Cell Death & Disease 8(7), e2938e2938. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2017.297.Google Scholar
Chen, H, Ma, J, Sunkel, B, Luo, A, Ding, F, Li, Y and Liu, Z (2013) S100A14: Novel modulator of terminal differentiation in esophageal cancer. Molecular Cancer Research 11(12), 15421553. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-13-0317.Google Scholar
Zhu, H, Gao, W, Li, X, Yu, L, Luo, D, Liu, Y and Yu, X (2021) S100A14 promotes progression and gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 21(3), 589598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2021.01.011.Google Scholar
Mohamed, BF, Serag, WM, Abdelal, RM and Elsergany, HF (2019) S100A14 protein as diagnostic and prognostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma. Egyptian Liver Journal 9(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-019-0015-6.Google Scholar
Fang, D, Zhang, C, Xu, P, Liu, Y, Mo, X, Sun, Q and Lan, L (2021) S100A16 promotes metastasis and progression of pancreatic cancer through FGF19-mediated AKT and ERK1/2 pathways. Cell Biology and Toxicology 37(4), 555571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-020-09574-w.Google Scholar
Ou, S, Liao, Y, Shi, J, Tang, J, Ye, Y, Wu, F and Bai, L (2021) S100A16 suppresses the proliferation, migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells in part via the JNK/p38 MAPK pathway. Molecular Medicine Reports 23(2). https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11803.Google Scholar
You, X, Li, M, Cai, H, Zhang, W, Hong, Y, Gao, W and Su, D (2021) Calcium binding protein S100A16 expedites proliferation, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition process in gastric cancer. Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology 9, 736929. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.736929.Google Scholar
Hwang, CC, Chai, HT, Chen, HW, Tsai, HL, Lu, CY, Yu, FJ and Wang, JY (2011) S100B protein expressions as an independent predictor of early relapse in UICC stages II and III colon cancer patients after curative resection. Annals of Surgical Oncology 18(1), 139145. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1209-7.Google Scholar
Dong, L, Wang, F, Yin, X, Chen, L, Li, G, Lin, F and Jiang, L (2014) Overexpression of S100P promotes colorectal cancer metastasis and decreases chemosensitivity to 5-FU in vitro. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 389(1–2), 257264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-013-1947-5.Google Scholar
Yuan, RH, Chang, KT, Chen, YL, Hsu, HC, Lee, PH, Lai, PL and Jeng, YM (2013) S100P expression is a novel prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma and predicts survival in patients with high tumor stage or early recurrent tumors. PLoS One 8(6), e65501. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065501.Google Scholar
Ge, F, Wang, C, Wang, W and Wu, B (2013) S100P predicts prognosis and drug resistance in gastric cancer. Int J Biol Marker 28, 0. https://doi.org/10.5301/jbm.5000034.Google Scholar
Hao, W, Zhang, Y, Dou, J, Cui, P and Zhu, J (2023) S100P as a potential biomarker for immunosuppressive microenvironment in pancreatic cancer: A bioinformatics analysis and in vitro study. BMC Cancer 23(1), 997. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11490-1.Google Scholar
Peterova, E, Bures, J, Moravkova, P and Kohoutova, D (2021) Tissue mRNA for S100A4, S100A6, S100A8, S100A9, S100A11 and S100P proteins in colorectal neoplasia: A pilot study. Molecules 26(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26020402.Google Scholar
Sawyer, JR, Tian, E, Walker, BA, Wardell, C, Lukacs, JL, Sammartino, G and van Rhee, F (2019) An acquired high-risk chromosome instability phenotype in multiple myeloma: Jumping 1q syndrome. Blood Cancer Journal 9(8), 62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-019-0226-4.Google Scholar
Chen, L, Chan, TH and Guan, XY (2010) Chromosome 1q21 amplification and oncogenes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 31(9), 11651171. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2010.94.Google Scholar
Seguella, L, Rinaldi, F, Marianecci, C, Capuano, R, Pesce, M, Annunziata, G and Sarnelli, G (2020) Pentamidine niosomes thwart S100B effects in human colon carcinoma biopsies favouring wtp53 rescue. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 24(5), 30533063. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.14943.Google Scholar
Huang, MY, Wang, HM, Chang, HJ, Hsiao, CP, Wang, JY and Lin, SR (2012) Overexpression of S100B, TM4SF4, and OLFM4 genes is correlated with liver metastasis in Taiwanese colorectal cancer patients. DNA and Cell Biology 31(1), 4349. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2011.1264.Google Scholar
Bertram, J, Palfner, K, Hiddemann, W and Kneba, M (1998) Elevated expression of S100P, CAPL and MAGE 3 in doxorubicin-resistant cell lines: Comparison of mRNA differential display reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and subtractive suppressive hybridization for the analysis of differential gene expression. Anti-Cancer Drugs 9(4), 311317. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001813-199804000-00004.Google Scholar
Mencía, N, Selga, E, Rico, I, de Almagro, MC, Villalobos, X, Ramirez, S and Ciudad, CJ (2010) Overexpression of S100A4 in human cancer cell lines resistant to methotrexate. BMC Cancer 10(1), 250. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-250.Google Scholar
Tsai, ST, Jin, YT, Tsai, WC, Wang, ST, Lin, YC, Chang, MT and Wu, LW (2005) S100A2, a potential marker for early recurrence in early-stage oral cancer. Oral Oncology 41(4), 349357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.09.006.Google Scholar
Xiong, TF, Pan, FQ and Li, D (2019) Expression and clinical significance of S100 family genes in patients with melanoma. Melanoma Research 29(1), 2329. https://doi.org/10.1097/cmr.0000000000000512.Google Scholar
Cancemi, P, Buttacavoli, M, Di Cara, G, Albanese, NN, Bivona, S, Pucci-Minafra, I and Feo, S (2018) A multiomics analysis of S100 protein family in breast cancer. Oncotarget 9(49), 2906429081. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25561.Google Scholar
Liu, Y, Cui, J, Tang, YL, Huang, L, Zhou, CY and Xu, JX (2018) Prognostic roles of mRNA expression of S100 in non-small-cell lung cancer. BioMed Research International 2018, 9815806. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9815806.Google Scholar
Bai, Y, Li, LD, Li, J and Lu, X (2018) Prognostic values of S100 family members in ovarian cancer patients. BMC Cancer 18(1), 1256. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5170-3.Google Scholar
Yonemura, Y, Endou, Y, Kimura, K, Fushida, S, Bandou, E, Taniguchi, K and Sasaki, T (2000) Inverse expression of S100A4 and E-cadherin is associated with metastatic potential in gastric cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 6(11), 42344242.Google Scholar
Chen, X, Liu, X, Lang, H, Zhang, S, Luo, Y and Zhang, J (2015) S100 calcium-binding protein A6 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition through β-catenin in pancreatic cancer cell line. PLoS One 10, e0121319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121319.Google Scholar
Ning, X, Sun, S, Zhang, K, Liang, J, Chuai, Y, Li, Y and Wang, X (2012) S100A6 protein negatively regulates CacyBP/SIP-mediated inhibition of gastric cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. PLoS One 7(1), e30185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030185.Google Scholar
Zhou, G, Xie, TX, Zhao, M, Jasser, S, Younes, M, Sano, D and Myers, J (2008) Reciprocal negative regulation between S100A7/psoriasin and beta-catenin signaling plays an important role in tumor progression of squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity. Oncogene 27, 35273538. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1211015.Google Scholar
Duan, L, Wu, R, Ye, L, Wang, H, Yang, X, Zhang, Y and Zhou, L (2013) S100A8 and S100A9 are associated with colorectal carcinoma progression and contribute to colorectal carcinoma cell survival and migration via Wnt/β-catenin pathway. PLoS One 8(4), e62092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062092.Google Scholar
Qi, Y, Zhang, Y, Li, J, Cai, M, Zhang, B, Yu, Z and Liu, S (2023) S100A family is a group of immune markers associated with poor prognosis and immune cell infiltration in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 23(1), 637. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11127-3.Google Scholar
Takamatsu, H, Yamamoto, KI, Tomonobu, N, Murata, H, Inoue, Y, Yamauchi, A and Sakaguchi, M (2019) Extracellular S100A11 plays a critical role in spread of the fibroblast population in pancreatic cancers. Oncology Research 27(6), 713727. https://doi.org/10.3727/096504018x15433161908259.Google Scholar
Wu, R, Duan, L, Ye, L, Wang, H, Yang, X, Zhang, Y and Zhou, L (2013) S100A9 promotes the proliferation and invasion of HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells via the activation of the MAPK signaling pathway corrigendum in /10.3892/ijo.2023.5494. International Journal of Oncology 42(3), 10011010. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2013.1796.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, M, Williams, R, Wang, L, Vogl, T and Srikrishna, G (2011) S100A8/A9 activate key genes and pathways in colon tumor progression. Molecular Cancer Research 9(2), 133148. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-10-0394.Google Scholar
Nedjadi, T, Evans, A, Sheikh, A, Barerra, L, Al-Ghamdi, S, Oldfield, L and Costello, E (2018) S100A8 and S100A9 proteins form part of a paracrine feedback loop between pancreatic cancer cells and monocytes. BMC Cancer 18(1), 1255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-5161-4.Google Scholar
Li, C, Chen, H, Ding, F, Zhang, Y, Luo, A, Wang, M and Liu, Z (2009) A novel p53 target gene, S100A9, induces p53-dependent cellular apoptosis and mediates the p53 apoptosis pathway. The Biochemical Journal 422(2), 363372. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj20090465.Google Scholar
Chen, H, Yuan, Y, Zhang, C, Luo, A, Ding, F, Ma, J and Liu, Z (2012) Involvement of S100A14 protein in cell invasion by affecting expression and function of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 via p53-dependent transcriptional regulation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 287, 1710917119. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.326975.Google Scholar
Chen, Q, Guo, H, Jiang, H, Hu, Z, Yang, X, Yuan, Z and Bai, Y (2023) S100A2 induces epithelial–mesenchymal transition and metastasis in pancreatic cancer by coordinating transforming growth factor β signaling in SMAD4-dependent manner. Cell Death Discovery 9(1), 356. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-023-01661-1.Google Scholar
Li, F, shi, J, Xu, Z, Yao, X, Mou, T, yu, J and Li, G (2018) S100A4-MYH9 axis promote migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells by inducing TGF-β-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Journal of Cancer 9, 38393849. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.25469.Google Scholar
Koveitypour, Z, Panahi, F, Vakilian, M, Peymani, M, Seyed Forootan, F, Nasr Esfahani, MH and Ghaedi, K (2019) Signaling pathways involved in colorectal cancer progression. Cell & Bioscience 9(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-019-0361-4.Google Scholar
Al-Shamsi, HO, Jones, J, Fahmawi, Y, Dahbour, I, Tabash, A, Abdel-Wahab, R and Wolff, RA (2016) Molecular spectrum of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, TP53, and APC somatic gene mutations in Arab patients with colorectal cancer: Determination of frequency and distribution pattern. J Gastrointest Oncol 7(6), 882902.Google Scholar
Sack, U, Walther, W, Scudiero, D, Selby, M, Aumann, J, Lemos, C and Stein, U (2011) S100A4-induced cell motility and metastasis is restricted by the Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitor calcimycin in colon cancer cells. Molecular Biology of the Cell 22(18), 33443354. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-09-0739.Google Scholar
Stein, U, Arlt, F, Smith, J, Sack, U, Herrmann, P, Walther, W and Schlag, PM (2011) Intervening in β-catenin signaling by sulindac inhibits S100A4-dependent colon cancer metastasis. Neoplasia 13(2), 131144. https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.101172.Google Scholar
Stoll, SW, Zhao, X and Elder, JT (1998) EGF stimulates transcription of CaN19 (S100A2) in HaCaT keratinocytes. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology 111(6), 10921097. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00402.x.Google Scholar
Paruchuri, V, Prasad, A, McHugh, K, Bhat, HK, Polyak, K and Ganju, RK (2008) S100A7-downregulation inhibits epidermal growth factor-induced signaling in breast cancer cells and blocks osteoclast formation. PLoS One 3(3), e1741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001741.Google Scholar
Bergenfelz, C, Gaber, A, Allaoui, R, Mehmeti, M, Jirström, K, Leanderson, T and Leandersson, K (2015) S100A9 expressed in ER(−)PgR(−) breast cancers induces inflammatory cytokines and is associated with an impaired overall survival. British Journal of Cancer 113(8), 12341243. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.346.Google Scholar
Van Dieck, J, Fernandez-Fernandez, MR, Veprintsev, DB and Fersht, AR (2009) Modulation of the oligomerization state of p53 by differential binding of proteins of the S100 family to p53 monomers and tetramers. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 284(20), 1380413811. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M901351200.Google Scholar
Kirschner, RD, Sänger, K, Müller, GA and Engeland, K (2008) Transcriptional activation of the tumor suppressor and differentiation gene S100A2 by a novel p63-binding site. Nucleic Acids Research 36(9), 29692980. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn132.Google Scholar
Orre, LM, Panizza, E, Kaminskyy, VO, Vernet, E, Gräslund, T, Zhivotovsky, B and Lehtiö, J (2013) S100A4 interacts with p53 in the nucleus and promotes p53 degradation. Oncogene 32(49), 55315540. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2013.213.Google Scholar
Lin, J, Yang, Q, Yan, Z, Markowitz, J, Wilder, PT, Carrier, F and Weber, DJ (2004) Inhibiting S100B restores p53 levels in primary malignant melanoma cancer cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 279(32), 3407134077. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M405419200.Google Scholar
Wang, X, Zhao, G, Shao, S and Yao, Y (2024) Helicobacter pylori triggers inflammation and oncogenic transformation by perturbing the immune microenvironment. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta. Reviews on Cancer 1879(5), 189139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2024.189139.Google Scholar
Rohm, TV, Meier, DT, Olefsky, JM and Donath, MY (2022) Inflammation in obesity, diabetes, and related disorders. Immunity 55(1), 3155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2021.12.013.Google Scholar
Franks, AL and Slansky, JE (2012) Multiple associations between a broad spectrum of autoimmune diseases, chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer. Anticancer Research 32(4), 11191136.Google Scholar
Elisia, I, Lam, V, Cho, B, Hay, M, Li, MY, Yeung, M and Krystal, G (2020) The effect of smoking on chronic inflammation, immune function and blood cell composition. Scientific Reports 10(1), 19480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76556-7.Google Scholar
Alorda-Clara, M, Torrens-Mas, M, Hernández-López, R, de la Rosa, JM, Falcó, E, Fernández, T and Roca, P (2022) Inflammation- and metastasis-related proteins expression changes in early stages in tumor and non-tumor adjacent tissues of colorectal cancer samples. Cancers (Basel) 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14184487.Google Scholar
Sui, Q, Zhang, X, Chen, C, Tang, J, Yu, J, Li, W and Ding, P-R (2022) Inflammation promotes resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in high microsatellite instability colorectal cancer. Nature Communications 13(1), 7316. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35096-6.Google Scholar
Linson, EA and Hanauer, SB (2021) Epidemiology of colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease– The evolving landscape. Current Gastroenterology Reports 23(9), 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-021-00816-3.Google Scholar
Saviano, A, Migneco, A, Brigida, M, Petruzziello, C, Zanza, C, Savioli, G and Ojetti, V (2024) Serum calprotectin in the evaluation of gastrointestinal diseases: An ace up your sleeve? Medicina 60(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60050762.Google Scholar
Turovskaya, O, Foell, D, Sinha, P, Vogl, T, Newlin, R, Nayak, J and Srikrishna, G (2008) RAGE, carboxylated glycans and S100A8/A9 play essential roles in colitis-associated carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 29(10), 20352043. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgn188.Google Scholar
Ma, L, Sun, P, Zhang, JC, Zhang, Q and Yao, SL (2017) Proinflammatory effects of S100A8/A9 via TLR4 and RAGE signaling pathways in BV-2 microglial cells. International Journal of Molecular Medicine 40(1), 3138. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2017.2987.Google Scholar
Lin, J, Blake, M, Tang, C, Zimmer, D, Rustandi, RR, Weber, DJ and Carrier, F (2001) Inhibition of p53 transcriptional activity by the S100B calcium-binding protein. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 276(37), 3503735041. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M104379200.Google Scholar
Wellenstein, MD, Coffelt, SB, Duits, DEM, van Miltenburg, MH, Slagter, M, de Rink, I and de Visser, KE (2019) Loss of p53 triggers WNT-dependent systemic inflammation to drive breast cancer metastasis. Nature 572(7770), 538542. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1450-6.Google Scholar
Testa, U, Pelosi, E and Castelli, G (2018) Colorectal cancer: Genetic abnormalities, tumor progression, tumor heterogeneity, clonal evolution and tumor-initiating cells. Medical Science 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci6020031.Google Scholar
Pizzino, G, Irrera, N, Cucinotta, M, Pallio, G, Mannino, F, Arcoraci, V and Bitto, A (2017) Oxidative stress: Harms and benefits for human health. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2017, 8416763. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8416763.Google Scholar
Kay, J, Thadhani, E, Samson, L and Engelward, B (2019) Inflammation-induced DNA damage, mutations and cancer. DNA Repair (Amst) 83, 102673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102673.Google Scholar
Cerezo, LA, Remáková, M, Tomčik, M, Gay, S, Neidhart, M, Lukanidin, E and Šenolt, L (2014) The metastasis-associated protein S100A4 promotes the inflammatory response of mononuclear cells via the TLR4 signalling pathway in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 53(8), 15201526. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keu031.Google Scholar
Hibino, S, Kawazoe, T, Kasahara, H, Itoh, S, Ishimoto, T, Sakata-Yanagimoto, M and Taniguchi, K (2021) Inflammation-induced tumorigenesis and metastasis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115421.Google Scholar
Seguella, L, Rinaldi, F, Marianecci, C, Capuano, R, Pesce, M, Annunziata, G and Sarnelli, G (2020) Pentamidine niosomes thwart S100B effects in human colon carcinoma biopsies favouring wtp53 rescue. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 24(5), 30533063. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.14943.Google Scholar
Li, C, Chen, Q, Zhou, Y, Niu, Y, Wang, X, Li, X and Gao, H (2020) S100A2 promotes glycolysis and proliferation via GLUT1 regulation in colorectal cancer. The FASEB Journal 34(10), 1333313344. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202000555R.Google Scholar
Hashida, H and Coffey, RJ (2022) Significance of a calcium-binding protein S100A14 expression in colon cancer progression. J Gastrointest Oncol 13(1), 149162. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-21-528.Google Scholar
Jin, Q, Chen, H, Luo, A, Ding, F and Liu, Z (2011) S100A14 stimulates cell proliferation and induces cell apoptosis at different concentrations via receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). PLoS One 6(4), e19375. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019375.Google Scholar
Gibadulinova, A, Pastorek, M, Filipcik, P, Radvak, P, Csaderova, L, Vojtesek, B and Pastorekova, S (2016) Cancer-associated S100P protein binds and inactivates p53, permits therapy-induced senescence and supports chemoresistance. Oncotarget 7(16), 2250822522. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7999.Google Scholar
Bao, X, Wang, D, Dai, X, Liu, C, Zhang, H, Jin, Y and Fang, W (2023) An immunometabolism subtyping system identifies S100A9+ macrophage as an immune therapeutic target in colorectal cancer based on multiomics analysis. Cell Reports Medicine 4(4), 100987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.100987.Google Scholar
Grum-Schwensen, B, Klingelhöfer, J, Beck, M, Bonefeld, CM, Hamerlik, P, Guldberg, P and Ambartsumian, N (2015) S100A4-neutralizing antibody suppresses spontaneous tumor progression, pre-metastatic niche formation and alters T-cell polarization balance. BMC Cancer 15, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1034-2.Google Scholar
Anderson, NM and Simon, MC (2020) The tumor microenvironment. Current Biology 30(16), R921r925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.081.Google Scholar
Carrà, G, Lingua, MF, Maffeo, B, Taulli, R and Morotti, A (2020) P53 vs NF-κB: The role of nuclear factor-kappa B in the regulation of p53 activity and vice versa. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 77(22), 44494458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-020-03524-9.Google Scholar
Hatthakarnkul, P, Ammar, A, Pennel, KAF, Officer-Jones, L, Cusumano, S, Quinn, JA and Edwards, J (2023) Protein expression of S100A2 reveals it association with patient prognosis and immune infiltration profile in colorectal cancer. Journal of Cancer 14(10), 18371847. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.83910.Google Scholar
Kazakova, E, Rakina, M, Sudarskikh, T, Iamshchikov, P, Tarasova, A, Tashireva, L and Larionova, I (2023) Angiogenesis regulators S100A4, SPARC and SPP1 correlate with macrophage infiltration and are prognostic biomarkers in colon and rectal cancers. Frontiers in Oncology 13, 1058337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1058337.Google Scholar
Che, LH, Liu, JW, Huo, JP, Luo, R, Xu, RM, He, C, Li, JM, Zhou, AJ, Huang, P, Chen, YY, Ni, W, Zhou, YX, Liu, YY, Li, HY, Zhou, R, Mo, H and Li, JM (2021) A single-cell atlas of liver metastases of colorectal cancer reveals reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment in response to preoperative chemotherapy. Cell Discov 7(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-021-00312-y.Google Scholar
Kim, J, Oh, S-H, Kim, E-J, Park, S, Hong, SP, Cheon, J and Kim, W (2012) The role of myofibroblasts in upregulation of S100A8 and S100A9 and the differentiation of myeloid cells in the colorectal cancer microenvironment. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 423, 6066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.05.081.Google Scholar
Lin, M, Fang, Y, Li, Z, Li, Y, Feng, X, Zhan, Y and Deng, H (2021) S100P contributes to promoter demethylation and transcriptional activation of SLC2A5 to promote metastasis in colorectal cancer. British Journal of Cancer 125(5), 734747. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01306-z.Google Scholar
Zhang, X, Wei, L, Wang, J, Qin, Z, Wang, J, Lu, Y and Ma, J (2017) Suppression colitis and colitis-associated colon cancer by anti-S100A9 antibody in mice. Frontiers in Immunology 8, 1774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01774.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, M., et al. (2012) Systemic shRNA mediated knock down of S100A4 in colorectal cancer xenografted mice reduces metastasis formation. Oncotarget 3(8), 783797.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, I, Ambati, R and Gundamaraju, R (2021) Exploring the crosstalk between inflammation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer. Mediators of Inflammation 2021, 9918379. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9918379.Google Scholar
Wang, D, Sun, H, Wei, J, Cen, B and DuBois, RN (2017) CXCL1 is critical for premetastatic niche formation and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Cancer Research 77(13), 36553665. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-3199.Google Scholar
Han, F, Zhang, L, Liao, S, Zhang, Y, Qian, L, Hou, F and Zhang, H (2022) The interaction between S100A2 and KPNA2 mediates NFYA nuclear import and is a novel therapeutic target for colorectal cancer metastasis. Oncogene 41(5), 657670. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-021-02116-6.Google Scholar
Zuo, Z, Zhang, P, Lin, F, Shang, W, Bi, R, Lu, F and Jiang, L (2018) Interplay between Trx-1 and S100P promotes colorectal cancer cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition by up-regulating S100A4 through AKT activation. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 22(4), 24302441. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13541.Google Scholar
Schmid, F, Dahlmann, M, Röhrich, H, Kobelt, D, Hoffmann, J, Burock, S and Stein, U (2022) Calcium-binding protein S100P is a new target gene of MACC1, drives colorectal cancer metastasis and serves as a prognostic biomarker. British Journal of Cancer 127(4), 675685. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-022-01833-3.Google Scholar
Emran, TB, Shahriar, A, Mahmud, AR, Rahman, T, Abir, MH, Siddiquee, MF and Hassan, MM (2022) Multidrug resistance in cancer: Understanding molecular mechanisms, immunoprevention and therapeutic approaches. Frontiers in Oncology 12, 891652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.891652.Google Scholar
Hua, X, Zhang, H, Jia, J, Chen, S, Sun, Y and Zhu, X (2020) Roles of S100 family members in drug resistance in tumors: Status and prospects. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 127, 110156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110156.Google Scholar
Li, Y, Zhao, B, Peng, J, Tang, H, Wang, S, Peng, S and Chen, Y (2024) Inhibition of NF-κB signaling unveils novel strategies to overcome drug resistance in cancers. Drug Resistance Updates 73, 101042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2023.101042.Google Scholar
Harada, Y, Ikeda, S, Kawabe, Y, Oguri, Y, Hashimura, M, Yokoi, A and Saegusa, M (2024) S100A4 contributes to colorectal carcinoma aggressive behavior and to chemoradiotherapy resistance in locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Scientific Reports 14(1), 31338. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82814-9.Google Scholar
Schmidt, WM, Kalipciyan, M, Dornstauder, E, Rizovski, B, Steger, GG, Sedivy, R and Mader, RM (2004) Dissecting progressive stages of 5-fluorouracil resistance in vitro using RNA expression profiling. International Journal of Cancer 112(2), 200212. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20401.Google Scholar
Liu, Y, Yang, C, Zhao, Y, Chi, Q, Wang, Z and Sun, B (2019) Overexpressed methyltransferase-like 1 (METTL1) increased chemosensitivity of colon cancer cells to cisplatin by regulating miR-149-3p/S100A4/p53 axis. Aging (Albany NY) 11(24), 1232812344. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.102575.Google Scholar
Boye, K, Jacob, H, Frikstad, KA, Nesland, JM, Maelandsmo, GM, Dahl, O and Flatmark, K (2016) Prognostic significance of S100A4 expression in stage II and III colorectal cancer: Results from a population-based series and a randomized phase III study on adjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Medicine 5(8), 18401849. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.766.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S, Yamayoshi, Y, Nishimuta, A and Tanigawara, Y (2011) S100A10 protein expression is associated with oxaliplatin sensitivity in human colorectal cancer cells. Proteome Science 9(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-9-76.Google Scholar
Fenouille, N, Grosso, S, Yunchao, S, Mary, D, Pontier-Bres, R, Imbert, V and Lagadec, P (2012) Calpain 2-dependent IκBα degradation mediates CPT-11 secondary resistance in colorectal cancer xenografts. The Journal of Pathology 227(1), 118129. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.3034.Google Scholar
Tang, H, Liu, YJ, Liu, M and Li, X (2007) Establishment and gene analysis of an oxaliplatin-resistant colon cancer cell line THC8307/L-OHP. Anti-Cancer Drugs 18(6), 633639. https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0b013e3280200428.Google Scholar
Kundu, S, Ali, MA, Handin, N, Conway, LP, Rendo, V, Artursson, P and Sjöblom, T (2021) Common and mutation specific phenotypes of KRAS and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer cells revealed by integrative -omics analysis. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 40(1), 225. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-02025-2.Google Scholar
Smeby, J, Sveen, A, Merok, MA, Danielsen, SA, Eilertsen, IA, Guren, MG and Lothe, RA (2018) CMS-dependent prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAFV600E mutations in primary colorectal cancer. Annals of Oncology 29(5), 12271234. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy085.Google Scholar
Lee, SJ, Choi, SY, Kim, WJ, Ji, M, Lee, TG, Son, BR and Park, SM (2013) Combined aberrant expression of E-cadherin and S100A4, but not β-catenin is associated with disease-free survival and overall survival in colorectal cancer patients. Diagnostic Pathology 8, 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-8-99.Google Scholar
Rajamäki, K, Taira, A, Katainen, R, Välimäki, N, Kuosmanen, A, Plaketti, RM and Aaltonen, LA (2021) Genetic and epigenetic characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 161(2), 592607. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.042.Google Scholar
Zeng, M-L, Zhu, X-J, Liu, J, Shi, P-C, Kang, Y-L, Lin, Z and Cao, Y-P (2020) An integrated bioinformatic analysis of the s100 gene family for the prognosis of colorectal cancer. BioMed Research International, 4746929. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4746929.Google Scholar
Moris, D, Spartalis, E, Angelou, A, Margonis, GA, Papalambros, A, Petrou, A and Felekouras, E (2016) The value of calprotectin S100A8/A9 complex as a biomarker in colorectal cancer: A systematic review. J buon 21(4), 859866.Google Scholar
Lehmann, FS, Trapani, F, Fueglistaler, I, Terracciano, LM, von Flüe, M, Cathomas, G and Beglinger, C (2014) Clinical and histopathological correlations of fecal calprotectin release in colorectal carcinoma. World Journal of Gastroenterology 20(17), 49944999. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.4994.Google Scholar
Tantyo, NA, Karyadi, AS, Rasman, SZ, Salim, MRG, Devina, A and Sumarpo, A (2019) The prognostic value of S100A10 expression in cancer. Oncology Letters 17(2), 14171424. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9751.Google Scholar
Melle, C, Ernst, G, Schimmel, B, Bleul, A, Mothes, H, Kaufmann, R and Von Eggeling, F (2006) Different expression of calgizzarin (S100A11) in normal colonic epithelium, adenoma and colorectal carcinoma. International Journal of Oncology 28(1), 195200.Google Scholar
Sun, X, Wang, T, Zhang, C, Ning, K, Guan, ZR, Chen, SX and Hua, D (2018) S100A16 is a prognostic marker for colorectal cancer. Journal of Surgical Oncology 117(2), 275283. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24822.Google Scholar
Wang, Q, Zhang, YN, Lin, GL, Qiu, HZ, Wu, B, Wu, HY and Lu, CM (2012) S100P, a potential novel prognostic marker in colorectal cancer. Oncology Reports 28(1), 303310. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2012.1794.Google Scholar
Li, J, Zhuo, JY, Zhou, W, Hong, JW, Chen, RG, Xie, HY and Jiang, DH (2020) Endoplasmic reticulum stress triggers delanzomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells through the PERK/eIF2α/ATF4/CHOP pathway. American Journal of Translational Research 12(6), 28752889.Google Scholar
Lee, MC, Chen, YK, Hsu, YJ and Lin, BR (2020) Niclosamide inhibits the cell proliferation and enhances the responsiveness of esophageal cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents. Oncology Reports 43(2), 549561. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7449.Google Scholar
Kaushal, JB, Bhatia, R, Kanchan, RK, Raut, P, Mallapragada, S, Ly, QP and Rachagani, S (2021) Repurposing Niclosamide for targeting pancreatic cancer by inhibiting Hh/Gli non-canonical Axis of Gsk3β. Cancers (Basel) 13(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13133105.Google Scholar
Zeyada, MS, Abdel-Rahman, N, El-Karef, A, Yahia, S, El-Sherbiny, IM and Eissa, LA (2020) Niclosamide-loaded polymeric micelles ameliorate hepatocellular carcinoma in vivo through targeting Wnt and notch pathways. Life Sciences 261, 118458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118458.Google Scholar
Kortüm, B, Radhakrishnan, H, Zincke, F, Sachse, C, Burock, S, Keilholz, U and Stein, U (2022) Combinatorial treatment with statins and niclosamide prevents CRC dissemination by unhinging the MACC1-β-catenin-S100A4 axis of metastasis. Oncogene 41(39), 44464458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-022-02407-6.Google Scholar
Kim, SW, Jang, TJ, Jung, KH and Suh, JI (2007) Sulindac prevents esophageal adenocarcinomas induced by gastroduodenal reflux in rats. Yonsei Medical Journal 48(6), 10201027. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2007.48.6.1020.Google Scholar
Wu, YL, Sun, B, Zhang, XJ, Wang, SN, He, HY, Qiao, MM and Xu, JY (2001) Growth inhibition and apoptosis induction of Sulindac on human gastric cancer cells. World Journal of Gastroenterology 7(6), 796800. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v7.i6.796.Google Scholar
Li, H, Yang, AL, Chung, YT, Zhang, W, Liao, J and Yang, GY (2013) Sulindac inhibits pancreatic carcinogenesis in LSL-KrasG12D-LSL-Trp53R172H-Pdx-1-Cre mice via suppressing aldo-keto reductase family 1B10 (AKR1B10). Carcinogenesis 34(9), 20902098. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgt170.Google Scholar
Li, X, Pathi, SS and Safe, S (2015) Sulindac sulfide inhibits colon cancer cell growth and downregulates specificity protein transcription factors. BMC Cancer 15, 974. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1956-8.Google Scholar
Qian, K, Sun, L, Zhou, G, Ge, H, Meng, Y, Li, J, et al. (2019) Trifluoperazine as an alternative strategy for the inhibition of tumor growth of colorectal cancer. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 120(9), 1575615765. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.28845.Google Scholar
Jiang, J, Huang, Z, Chen, X, Luo, R, Cai, H, Wang, H, et al. (2017) Trifluoperazine activates FOXO1-related signals to inhibit tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma. DNA and Cell Biology 36(10), 813821. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2017.3790.Google Scholar
Dou, C, Liu, Z, Xu, M, Jia, Y, Wang, Y, Li, Q and Liu, Q (2016) miR-187-3p inhibits the metastasis and epithelial–mesenchymal transition of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting S100A4. Cancer Letters 381(2), 380390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2016.08.011.Google Scholar
Chengling, L, Yulin, Z, Xiaoyu, X, Xingchen, L, Sen, Z, Ziming, W and Xianming, C (2021) miR-325-3p, a novel regulator of osteoclastogenesis in osteolysis of colorectal cancer through targeting S100A4. Molecular Medicine 27(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-021-00282-7.Google Scholar
He, Z, Yu, L, Luo, S, Li, M, Li, J, Li, Q and Wang, C (2017) miR-296 inhibits the metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of colorectal cancer by targeting S100A4. BMC Cancer 17(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3121-z.Google Scholar
Deguchi, A, Watanabe-Takahashi, M, Mishima, T, Omori, T, Ohto, U, Arashiki, N and Maru, Y (2023) Novel multivalent S100A8 inhibitory peptides attenuate tumor progression and metastasis by inhibiting the TLR4-dependent pathway. Cancer Gene Therapy 30(7), 973984. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-023-00604-3.Google Scholar
Cho, E, Mun, S-J, Kim, HK, Ham, YS, Gil, WJ and Yang, C-S (2024) Colon-targeted S100A8/A9-specific peptide systems ameliorate colitis and colitis-associated colorectal cancer in mouse models. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 45(3), 581593. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-023-01188-2.Google Scholar
Murthy, D, Attri, KS, Suresh, V, Rajacharya, GH, Valenzuela, CA, Thakur, R and Singh, PK (2024) The MUC1-HIF-1α signaling axis regulates pancreatic cancer pathogenesis through polyamine metabolism remodeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121(14), e2315509121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2315509121.Google Scholar
Aliabadi, A, Haghshenas, MR, Kiani, R, Panjehshahin, MR and Erfani, N (2024) Promising anticancer activity of cromolyn in colon cancer: In vitro and in vivo analysis. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 150(4), 207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05741-2.Google Scholar
Motawi, TK, El-Maraghy, SA, ElMeshad, AN, Nady, OM and Hammam, OA (2017) Cromolyn chitosan nanoparticles as a novel protective approach for colorectal cancer. Chemico-Biological Interactions 275, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2017.07.013.Google Scholar
Arumugam, T, Ramachandran, V and Logsdon, CD (2006) Effect of cromolyn on S100P interactions with RAGE and pancreatic cancer growth and invasion in mouse models. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 98(24), 18061818. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj498.Google Scholar
Kumar, A, Gautam, V, Sandhu, A, Rawat, K, Sharma, A and Saha, L (2023) Current and emerging therapeutic approaches for colorectal cancer: A comprehensive review. World J Gastrointest Surg 15(4), 495519. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i4.495.Google Scholar
Xie, Y-H, Chen, Y-X and Fang, J-Y (2020) Comprehensive review of targeted therapy for colorectal cancer. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 5(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-020-0116-z.Google Scholar
Bresnick, AR (2018) S100 proteins as therapeutic targets. Biophysical Reviews 10(6), 16171629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-018-0471-y.Google Scholar
Li, Q and Kang, C (2020) Mechanisms of action for small molecules revealed by structural biology in drug discovery. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155262.Google Scholar
Burock, S, Daum, S, Keilholz, U, Neumann, K, Walther, W and Stein, U (2018) Phase II trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of orally applied niclosamide in patients with metachronous or sychronous metastases of a colorectal cancer progressing after therapy: The NIKOLO trial. BMC Cancer 18(1), 297. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4197-9.Google Scholar
Talley, S, Valiauga, R, Anderson, L, Cannon, AR, Choudhry, MA and Campbell, EM (2021) DSS-induced inflammation in the colon drives a proinflammatory signature in the brain that is ameliorated by prophylactic treatment with the S100A9 inhibitor paquinimod. Journal of Neuroinflammation 18(1), 263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-021-02317-6.Google Scholar
Fan, R, Satilmis, H, Vandewalle, N, Verheye, E, Vlummens, P, Maes, A and De Veirman, K (2023) Tasquinimod suppresses tumor cell growth and bone resorption by targeting immunosuppressive myeloid cells and inhibiting c-MYC expression in multiple myeloma. Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005319.Google Scholar
Katte, RH, Dowarha, D, Chou, RH and Yu, C (2021) S100P interacts with p53 while Pentamidine inhibits this interaction. Biomolecules 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11050634.Google Scholar
Dakhel, S, Padilla, L, Adan, J, Masa, M, Martinez, JM, Roque, L and Hernández, JL (2014) S100P antibody-mediated therapy as a new promising strategy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Oncogene 3(3), e92e92. https://doi.org/10.1038/oncsis.2014.7.Google Scholar
Menon, A, Abd-Aziz, N, Khalid, K, Poh, CL and Naidu, R (2022) miRNA: A promising therapeutic target in cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911502.Google Scholar
Mudduluru, G, Ilm, K, Fuchs, S and Stein, U (2017) Epigenetic silencing of miR-520c leads to induced S100A4 expression and its mediated colorectal cancer progression. Oncotarget 8(13), 2108121094. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.15499.Google Scholar
Xiao, Y, Zhao, Q, Du, B, Chen, HY and Zhou, DZ (2018) MicroRNA-187 inhibits growth and metastasis of osteosarcoma by downregulating S100A4. Cancer Investigation 36(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2017.1415348.Google Scholar
Yang, D, Du, G, Xu, A, Xi, X and Li, D (2017) Expression of miR-149-3p inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion of bladder cancer by targeting S100A4. American Journal of Cancer Research 7(11), 22092219.Google Scholar
Sveen, A, Bruun, J, Eide, PW, Eilertsen, IA, Ramirez, L, Murumägi, A and Lothe, RA (2018) Colorectal cancer consensus molecular subtypes translated to preclinical models uncover potentially targetable cancer cell dependencies. Clinical Cancer Research 24(4), 794806. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1234.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the signalling pathways activated by extracellular S100 proteins. These proteins bind to different cell surface receptors, including RAGE, TLR4, EGFR, GPCR, and SR, and subsequently activate several signalling pathways involved in cancer progression. RAGE-mediated signalling activates MAPK, PI3K/AKT, and β-catenin pathways. TLR4-mediated signalling activates MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways. GPCR, EGFR-, and SR-mediated signalling activate MAPK pathways. The activation of these signalling pathways subsequently activates signalling cascades related to cancer progression, especially NF-κB signalling pathways, leading to the upregulation of genes involved in cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance. Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; AP-1, activator protein 1; c-myc, cellular myelocytomatosis oncogene; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK, extracellular signalling-related kinase; GPCR, G protein coupled receptor; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; PI3K, phosphatidyl inositol 3 phosphate; RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end products; RAF, rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; RAS, rat sarcoma virus; SR, scavenger receptor; TCF/LEF, T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor; TLR4, toll-like receptor 4.

Figure 1

Table 1. S100 proteins: characterisation and function in GI tract cancers

Figure 2

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the intracellular activity of S100 proteins in signalling pathways involved in CRC. The Wnt signalling pathway is activated after binding Wnt to the Frizzled receptor, resulting in the translocation of β-catenin from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. In the nucleus, β- catenin interacts with TCF/LEF transcription factors. EGF binding to EGFR activates PI3K/AKT/mTOR and ERK signalling pathways. The TGF-β signalling pathway is activated after TGF-β binding to TGF-βR, leading to the formation of a trimeric complex of Smad. This complex is translocated to the nucleus, influencing gene expression related to cancer progression. The activation of these signalling pathways upregulates the expression of genes involved in cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, invasion, and metastasis. The binding of S100 proteins to P53 suppress p53 signalling pathway and pathways related to apoptosis. Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; Bax, Bcl-2-associated protein x; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK, extracellular signalling-related kinase; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; PI3K, phosphatidyl inositol 3 phosphate; RAF, rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; RAS, rat sarcoma virus; TCF/LEF, T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor; TGF-β: transforming growth factor-β; TGF-βR: transforming growth factor-β receptor; SMAD, suppressor of mothers against decapentaplegic; Wnt, wingless-related integration site.

Figure 3

Table 2. Signalling pathways activated by S100 protein in GI tract cancers

Figure 4

Figure 3. Schematic overview of the potential mechanisms of extracellular and intracellular S100 proteins during CRC progression. (A) inflammation inducers activate neutrophils and monocytes, leading to increase the release of S100 proteins such as S100A8 and S100A9. These proteins are the ligands of TLR4, which activates the NF-κB signalling pathway and elevates cytokine production, resulting in increases inflammation in epithelial cells. (B) Overexpression of S100A8 and S100A9 activates various immune cells (e.g., neutrophils, macrophages, T cells), leading to excessive production of cytokines. The increased expression of S100 proteins and cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IFN-γ stimulates the production of ROS and RNS, resulting in the induction of mutagenesis in premalignant cells. (C) S100 proteins and cytokines releases from cells can directly or indirectly affect cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. (D) Extracellular S100 proteins such as S100A4, S100A8, S100A9, and S100A8/S100A9 activate NF-κB and MAPK signalling and subsequently promote CRC cell survival and proliferation. Intracellular S100 proteins, such as S100A2, S100A4, S100A8, S100A9, S100A8/S100A9, S100B, and S100P, regulate signalling pathways related to cancer progression such as AKT, TGF-β, β-catenin, and P53, which are involved in the cell growth, proliferation, invasion or metastasis of CRC. Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; IL, interleukin; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; RAGE, advanced glycosylation end-product receptor; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RNS, reactive nitrogen species; TGF-β: Transforming Growth Factor-β; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor alpha.

Figure 5

Table 3. Overview of potential S100 proteins-targeting inhibitors for treating GI tract cancers