Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-5q6g5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T12:39:24.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2025

Ishaan Madan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, https://ror.org/02dqehb95 Purdue University , West Lafayette, IN, USA
Shekoufeh Arabi Aliabadi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Johanna Huhtasaari
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Ebba Matic
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Emil Hogedal
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Kinga Kamińska
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Filip Nilsson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Axel Stark
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Fernando Izquierdo-Ruiz
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Hilda Sandström
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Martin Rahm*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Corresponding author: Martin Rahm; Email: martin.rahm@chalmers.se
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work poses and partially explores an astrobiological hypothesis: might polymeric sulfur and phosphorus-based oxides form heteropolymers in the acidic cloud decks of Venus’ atmosphere? Following an introduction to the emerging field of computational astrobiology, we demonstrate the use of quantum chemical methods to evaluate basic properties of a hypothetical carbon-free heteropolymer that might be sourced from feedstock in the Venusian atmosphere. Our modeling indicates that R-substituted polyphosphoric sulfonic ester polymers may form via multiple thermodynamically favorable pathways and exhibit sufficient kinetic stability to persist in the Venusian clouds. Their thermodynamic stability compares favorably to polypeptides, whose formation is slightly thermodynamically unfavored relative to amino acids in most known abiotic conditions. We propose a combined approach of vibrational spectroscopy and mass spectrometry to search for related materials in Venus’s atmosphere but note that none of the currently planned missions are well suited for their detection. While predicted Ultraviolet–Visible spectra suggest that the studied polymers are unlikely candidates for Venus’s unidentified UV absorbers, the broader possibility of sulfuric acid–based chemistry supporting alternative biochemistries challenges the traditional carbon-centric models of life. We argue that such unconventional lines of inquiry are warranted in the search for life beyond Earth.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Earth’s biochemistry is carbon-based, dependent on liquid water, and fueled by various energy sources, including sunlight and geothermal gradients. Beyond Earth, different environmental conditions could favor entirely distinct frameworks for life, raising questions such as: if not carbon-based, and not dependent on liquid water, what alternative chemistries and solvents might facilitate the emergence of complex, life-like systems? Tackling such a question scientifically is not an easy exercise, for it is inherently speculative. In this work, we entertain one such possibility, arguing for the potential of sulfur and phosphorus to supplement the role of carbon in forming alternative heteropolymers in the acidic cloud decks of Venus’ atmosphere. To investigate this hypothesis, we present a computational astrobiology case study of an R-substituted polyphosphoric sulfonic ester (Figure 1A).

Figure 1. A) An R-substituted poly (phosphoric sulfonic ester), a hypothetical class of Venusian heteropolymers imagined mimicking the structure of polypeptides. B) An R-substituted polypeptide, representative of the building blocks of life as we know it.

Venus has long intrigued scientists as a potential site for extraterrestrial life, despite its extreme surface conditions (Bains et al., Reference Bains, Petkowski, Rimmer and Seager2021, Reference Bains, Petkowski and Seager2023; Cockell, Reference Cockell1999; Dartnell et al., Reference Dartnell, Nordheim, Patel, Mason, Coates and Jones2015; Grinspoon and Bullock, Reference Grinspoon and Bullock2007; Izenberg et al., Reference Izenberg, Gentry, Smith, Gilmore, Grinspoon, Bullock, Boston and Słowik2021; Kotsyurbenko et al., Reference Kotsyurbenko, Cordova, Belov, Cheptsov, Kölbl, Khrunyk, Kryuchkova, Milojevic, Mogul, Sasaki, Słowik, Snytnikov and Vorobyova2021; Limaye et al., Reference Limaye, Mogul, Smith, Ansari, Słowik and Vaishampayan2018, Reference Limaye, Bullock, Baines, Cockell, Cordova, Cutts, Gentry, Grinspoon, Head, Jessup, Kompanichenko, Lee, Mathies, Milojevic, Mogul, Pertzborn, Rothschild, Sasaki, Schulze-Makuch and Way2021; Mogul et al., Reference Mogul, Limaye, Lee and Pasillas2021; Morowitz and Sagan, Reference Morowitz and Sagan1967; Patel et al., Reference Patel, Mason, Nordheim and Dartnell2022; Petkowski et al., Reference Petkowski, Seager, Grinspoon, Bains, Ranjan, Rimmer, Buchanan, Agrawal, Mogul and Carr2024; Schulze-Makuch et al., Reference Schulze-Makuch, Grinspoon, Abbas, Irwin and Bullock2004; Seager et al., Reference Seager, Petkowski, Gao, Bains, Bryan, Ranjan and Greaves2021), paving the way for numerous future missions that are in development or on the horizon (Kotsyurbenko et al., Reference Kotsyurbenko, Kompanichenko, Brouchkov, Khrunyk, Karlov, Sorokin and Skladnev2024): NASA’s DAVINCI mission (tentative: 2030) (Garvin et al., Reference Garvin, Getty, Arney, Johnson, Kohler, Schwer, Sekerak, Bartels, Saylor, Elliott, Goodloe, Garrison, Cottini, Izenberg, Lorenz, Malespin, Ravine, Webster, Atkinson and Zolotov2022), MIT/Rocket Lab’s “Morning Star” (no earlier than 2026 (French et al., Reference French, Mandy, Hunter, Mosleh, Sinclair, Beck, Seager, Petkowski, Carr, Grinspoon and Baumgardner2022; Seager et al., Reference Seager, Petkowski, Carr, Grinspoon, Ehlmann, Saikia, Agrawal, Buchanan, Weber, French, Klupar, Worden and Baumgardner2022), ESA’s EnVision (2031) (de Oliveira et al., Reference de Oliveira, Gil and Ghail2018), NASA VERITAS Orbiter (no earlier than 2031) (Smrekar et al., Reference Smrekar, Hensley, Nybakken, Wallace, Perkovic-Martin, You, Nunes, Brophy, Ely, Burt, Dyar, Helbert, Miller, Hartley, Kallemeyn, Whitten, Iess, Mastrogiuseppe, Younis and Mazarico2022), ISRO’s Shukrayaan-1 (potentially 2026) (Sundararajan, Reference Sundararajan2021), and Roscosmos Venera-D (proposed 2030s) (Zasova et al., Reference Zasova, Gorinov, Eismont, Kovalenko, Abbakumov and Bober2019).

Venus’s dense atmosphere is primarily composed of carbon dioxide (~96.5%) and nitrogen (~3%) with traces of other gases, including sulfur dioxide and water vapor (Hoffman et al., Reference Hoffman, Hodges, Donahue and McElroy1980; Johnson and de Oliveira, Reference Johnson and de Oliveira2019), leading to surface pressures nearly 90 times that of Earth and temperatures exceeding 460 °C (Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Svedhem and Head2018). However, at 48–70 km altitude, Venus’s atmospheric cloud decks offer Earth-like pressures and temperatures, creating a potential environment for liquid solvents (S. S. Limaye et al., Reference Limaye, Mogul, Smith, Ansari, Słowik and Vaishampayan2018). Venusian clouds, rich in sulfuric acid aerosols, host complex chemistry, and unknown UV absorbers, making them a subject of astrobiological interest (Esposito et al., Reference Hunten, Colin, Donahue and Moroz2022a; Titov et al., Reference Titov, Ignatiev, McGouldrick, Wilquet and Wilson2018). Recent, though debated, potential detections of phosphine (Greaves et al., Reference Greaves, Richards, Bains, Rimmer, Clements, Seager, Petkowski, Sousa-Silva, Ranjan and Fraser2021, Reference Greaves, Richards, Bains, Rimmer, Sagawa, Clements, Seager, Petkowski, Sousa-Silva, Ranjan, Drabek-Maunder, Fraser, Cartwright, Mueller-Wodarg, Zhan, Friberg, Coulson, Lee and Hoge2020) and ammonia (Bains et al., Reference Bains, Petkowski and Seager2023, Reference Bains, Petkowski and Seager2024; Duzdevich et al., Reference Duzdevich, Nisler, Petkowski, Bains, Kaminsky, Szostak and Seager2024; S. Seager et al., Reference Seager, Petkowski, Seager, Grimes, Zinsli, Vollmer-Snarr, Abd El-Rahman, Wishart, Lee, Gautam, Herrington, Bains and Darrow2024) further highlight Venus as a testbed for Earth-like and unconventional biochemistries (Bains et al., Reference Bains, Petkowski and Seager2023, Reference Bains, Petkowski and Seager2024; Duzdevich et al., Reference Duzdevich, Nisler, Petkowski, Bains, Kaminsky, Szostak and Seager2024; S. Seager et al., Reference Seager, Petkowski, Seager, Grimes, Zinsli, Vollmer-Snarr, Abd El-Rahman, Wishart, Lee, Gautam, Herrington, Bains and Darrow2024).

The primary component of Venus’ dense cloud layers is inferred to be sulfuric acid (Bains et al., Reference Bains, Petkowski and Seager2023). This liquid is a reactive, polar protic solvent that exhibits strong hydrogen bonding networks and readily exchanges protons with dissolved molecules. These features, alongside its natural occurrence, solvation capacity, chemical stability, and chemical functionality, are criteria that can be used to assess how life-sustaining an alternative solvent might be (see (Bains et al., Reference Bains, Petkowski and Seager2024) for a detailed discussion). While sulfuric acid meets most such criteria and compares favorably with water, it can readily degrade many organic compounds (e.g., sugars and dipeptides (Petkowski, Seager, Bains, et al., Reference Bains, Petkowski and Seager2024)). However, recent preliminary work has demonstrated the extended persistence of amino acids (M.D. Seager et al., Reference Seager, Seager, Bains and Petkowski2024) and nucleic acids (S. Seager et al., Reference Seager, Petkowski, Seager, Grimes, Zinsli, Vollmer-Snarr, Abd El-Rahman, Wishart, Lee, Gautam, Herrington, Bains and Darrow2024) in concentrated sulfuric acid. Because the ability of sulfuric acid to decompose terrestrial biomolecules has not been systematically investigated (Bains et al., Reference Bains, Petkowski and Seager2023), it remains largely unknown which forms of biochemistry this liquid might support. It is worth noting that water is also highly reactive under many conditions, e.g., in hydrolysis or in acid–base catalysis, depending on pH, and any life utilizing sulfuric acid as a solvent would presumably have evolved to thrive in it. We approach this possibility by examining the potential formation and stability of polymeric sulfur- and phosphorus-based oxides, which could maintain structural and functional stability in acidic media.

Beyond its scientific motivation, this project also served as a platform to engage and train successive undergraduate researchers. Their substantive contributions across multiple stages of the work are reflected in the large author list.

The chemical flexibility of sulfur and phosphorus

Sulfur and phosphorus in terrestrial biochemistry

Life on Earth is shaped by the abundance of reactive elements in the universe, particularly carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur (CHNOPS), in some combination with other elements (Domagal-Goldman et al., Reference Domagal-Goldman, Wright, Adamala, Arina de la Rubia, Bond, Dartnell, Goldman, Lynch, Naud, Paulino-Lima, Singer, Walther-Antonio, Abrevaya, Anderson, Arney, Atri, Azúa-Bustos, Bowman, Brazelton and Wong2016). Carbon is central to the CHNOPS elements, forming the covalent backbone of life’s macromolecules: carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids, all optimized for liquid water. The polypeptide chain illustrated in Figure 1B is one such carbon-rich example that relates to the imagined function of the R-substituted poly (phosphoric sulfonic ester) we study in this work.

Figure 2A shows 3′-phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS), another example wholly representative of CHNOPS. PAPS is the most common coenzyme facilitating sulfotransferase reaction (Günal et al., Reference Günal, Hardman, Kopriva and Mueller2019) and is highlighted here as a demonstration of the existence of –S–O–P-linkages in biology. Polyphosphates and phosphate esters, a motif related to our target of inquiry, are ubiquitous in biology, being involved in, e.g., signal transduction, energy production and transfer (e.g., Adenosine triphosphate/diphosphate (ATP/ADP)), and the regulation of protein function (Westheimer, Reference Westheimer1981). Both sulfur and phosphorus have numerous other roles in biology, ranging from structural components such as in sulfo- and phospholipid membranes, to metabolic intermediates, to signaling and enzymatic cofactors (Cleland and Hengge, Reference Cleland and Hengge2006), and in our genetic code, ribonucleic acid (RNA) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (Table 1).

Figure 2. Selected examples of sulfur and phosphorus in biology (A-C), and in Venus-relevant conditions (D-E): A) 3′-phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS), the most common coenzyme in sulfur-group transfer reactions. B) Sulfoquinovosyl diacylglycerol (SQDG), a sulfolipid found in many photosynthetic organisms (Karvansara et al., Reference Karvansara, Mishra and Singh2023). C) A general phospholipid, where the R group can be replaced to form major components of cell membranes (e.g., phosphatidylcholine). D) The cyclic trimer phase of sulfur trioxide (γ-SO3). E) Polymeric phase of sulfur trioxide (α-SO3).

Table 1. Comparison of carbon, sulfur, and phosphorus

a Electronegativity in eV/e from (Rahm et al., Reference Rahm, Zeng and Hoffmann2019)

Sulfur and phosphorus in extreme and Venus-like environments

Sulfur and phosphorus play critical roles across a variety of life forms, especially in extremophiles that thrive in harsh environments. The capacity of sulfur to hold multiple oxidation states can support energy metabolism and redox buffering, particularly in sulfur-rich or fluctuating conditions (Schulze-Makuch and Irwin, Reference Schulze-Makuch and Irwin2006; Wasmund et al., Reference Wasmund, Mußmann and Loy2017). For example, marine sediment microbes and phototrophic bacteria oxidize sulfur compounds for energy, demonstrating sulfur’s adaptability across environmental extremes (Rampelotto, Reference Rampelotto2010). In acidophiles inhabiting volcanic lakes or acid mine drainage, sulfur compounds play dual roles in energy generation and mitigating acidity through redox buffering (Baker-Austin and Dopson, Reference Baker-Austin and Dopson2007). Phosphorus, primarily in the form of phosphates and polyphosphates, complements sulfur by providing energy storage, stabilizing cellular structures, and maintaining pH homeostasis. One likely reason for the prevalence of phosphate esters in biology is their substantial kinetic stability. This stability is particularly pronounced when the phosphates are negatively charged, as the resulting electrostatic repulsion hinders nucleophilic addition of anions (Kamerlin et al., Reference Kamerlin, Sharma, Prasad and Warshel2013). While we do not study kinetic stability in detail in this work, we note that an arbitrary number of negatively charged –OR groups (e.g., alkoxy groups) on a hypothetical R-substituted poly (phosphoric sulfonic ester) could render it negatively charged, thereby affecting the polymer’s resistance to hydrolysis and other degradation pathways. Both sulfur and phosphorus are necessary for acid resistance in biology, stabilizing genetic materials like DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) and RNA (ribonucleic acid) and enabling microbial life in acidic, oxidative environments (Baker-Austin and Dopson, Reference Baker-Austin and Dopson2007; Barrie Johnson and Hallberg, Reference Barrie Johnson and Hallberg2009).

Despite the centrality of phosphate-bearing molecules in modern biology, their prebiotic incorporation on early Earth posed considerable challenges due to their poor solubility in aqueous conditions and the endergonic nature of phosphorylation reactions. This issue, often referred to as the “phosphate problem”, is closely linked to the geochemical conditions of the Hadean oceans: high water activity, near-neutral pH, and apatite-dominated reservoirs (see (Pasek et al., Reference Pasek, Gull and Herschy2017) for details). It has been shown (Toner and Catling, Reference Toner and Catling2020) that phosphate can accumulate to high concentrations in carbonate-rich lakes, adding nuance to how the phosphate problem may be alleviated under certain conditions. Phosphate limitations can also be eased under low water activity, strongly acidic or oxidizing conditions, or when transient, highly reactive phosphate phases (e.g., poly- and metaphosphates) are continuously regenerated (Pasek et al., Reference Pasek, Gull and Herschy2017). Venus’s sulfuric-acid cloud decks may satisfy all three criteria: (i) extremely low water activity, (ii) persistent acidity, (iii) potential for sulfur and phosphorus cycling of compounds that could replenish reactive species. In such an environment, fully oxidized phosphorus (rather than reduced), could remain chemically accessible and kinetically stable, thereby supporting our focus on high-valent polymeric sulfur- and phosphorus-based oxides.

Sulfur trioxide (SO₃) is likely present throughout Venus’s atmosphere (Bierson and Zhang, Reference Bierson and Zhang2020; Petkowski et al., Reference Petkowski, Seager, Bains and Seager2024). SO₃ is known to form various condensed-phase structures, including monomers, cyclic trimers (γ-SO₃, Fig. 2D), and linear chain polymers (α-SO₃, Fig. 2E and β-SO₃). These polymorphs contain strong S–O bonds, allowing SO₃ to exist in different forms under various temperatures and pressures (Lovejoy et al., Reference Lovejoy, Colwell, Eggers and Halsey1962). In Venus’ cloud decks at 48–70 km altitudes, temperatures range from ~200 to 350 K (Titov et al., Reference Titov, Ignatiev, McGouldrick, Wilquet and Wilson2018). The exact melting points of the γ-, β-, and α- SO₃ phases vary (Lovejoy et al., Reference Lovejoy, Colwell, Eggers and Halsey1962) but generally lie below 350 K, implying they could exist in dynamic equilibrium under Venus’s cloud conditions. We highlight SO₃’s inherent ability to form a variety of polymeric oxides for it is a relevant justification for our speculations regarding sulfur- and phosphorus-based biochemistry in Venus’s cloud layer.

In Table 1, we compare some properties of carbon, sulfur, and phosphorus, emphasizing their roles in forming (potential) biopolymer analogs. Carbon, while versatile, transforms into carbon dioxide when fully oxidized, which is relatively inert and unable to (spontaneously) form complex structures. In contrast, sulfur and phosphorus retain the ability to form polymeric structures even in high oxidation states. This ability is particularly relevant in environments like Venusian cloud decks, where acidic and oxidative conditions prevail.

Computational astrobiology

While this study aims to demonstrate the use of quantum chemical calculations to approach specific chemical questions, such as molecular stability and detection characteristics, it does not aim to definitively answer these questions. Instead, our work is intended to serve as a brief introduction to and advocate for computational astrobiology, an emerging and interdisciplinary field in which questions regarding the origin, evolution, and distribution of life in the Universe are approached using computational methods (Chaban et al., Reference Chaban, Colombano, Scargle, New Michael, Pohorille and Wilson2002). Although the term computational astrobiology is not widespread, many have utilized computational tools to study the origins of life-related questions. Such exercises, which are beyond the scope of this work to review in full, involve the creative integration of methods from computer science and modeling with knowledge from the physical sciences, such as chemistry, biology, geology, paleontology, physics, planetary science, and atmospheric sciences, to explore questions regarding life beyond Earth. Andrzej Pohorille, who directed the Center for Computational Astrobiology at NASA Ames Research Center (Gronstal, Reference Gronstal2024), is one prominent example of an early contributor to this field. Pohorille’s work includes, but is not limited to, the computational study of biomolecular systems (e.g., (Pohorille and Wilson, Reference Pohorille and Wilson1993), statistical mechanics of condensed phases (e.g., (Pohorille and Pratt, Reference Pohorille and Pratt1986), as well as some of the earliest molecular dynamics simulations on supercomputers (Pohorille et al., Reference Pohorille, Ross and Tinoco1990). This breadth of early contributions exemplifies one challenge of discussing computational astrobiology: the field is exceptionally diverse.

For brevity’s sake, we limit our following non-exhaustive summary of literature to a selected few cases in which astrobiological hypotheses related to non-Earth-like chemistry are explored using atomistic modeling. We purposefully exclude more conventional astrochemistry, as well as prebiotic chemistry, and origin of life studies focused on processes on Earth. We refer the interested reader to (Grefenstette et al., Reference Grefenstette, Chou, Colón-Santos, Fisher, Mierzejewski, Nural, Sinhadc, Vidaurri, Vincent and Weng2024), Chapter 9 of the Astrobiology Primer 3.0, which examines alternative biochemistries in more detail beyond the computational lens.

Computational structure generation, e.g., using graph-theoretical algorithms, is one approach for exploring the vast chemical spaces that could support exotic life forms (Meringer and Cleaves, Reference Meringer and Cleaves2017). Stochastic simulations of the formation and growth of molecular networks, as well as reflexively autocatalytic set (RAF) analyses, have demonstrated that alternative biochemical systems can sustain autocatalytic feedback loops, resembling metabolic pathways (Grefenstette et al., Reference Grefenstette, Chou, Colón-Santos, Fisher, Mierzejewski, Nural, Sinhadc, Vidaurri, Vincent and Weng2024; Kun et al., Reference Kun, Papp and Szathmáry2008; Xavier et al., Reference Xavier, Hordijk, Kauffman, Steel and Martin2020). Comparison of calculated solvation free energies of molecules in water and cyclohexane has recently served as a preliminary proof-of-concept for exploring the potential of life in alternate media (Giacometti, Reference Giacometti2024). Additionally, xeno-nucleic acids, synthetic alternatives to DNA and RNA (e.g., peptide nucleic acids, hexitol nucleic acids) may have predated traditional nucleic acids in Earth’s evolutionary history (Brown et al., Reference Brown, Mayer-Bacon and Freeland2023; Grefenstette et al., Reference Grefenstette, Chou, Colón-Santos, Fisher, Mierzejewski, Nural, Sinhadc, Vidaurri, Vincent and Weng2024), potentially holding a capacity to support primitive information storage. Quantum chemistry has been used to investigate the thermodynamic stability of conformations of model nucleic acid analogs (Alenaizan et al., Reference Alenaizan, Barnett, Hud, Sherrill and Petrov2021). Other notable examples are quantum chemical estimates of oxygen-free molecular biochemistry (Lv et al., Reference Lv, Norman and Li2017), the use of ab initio structure prediction and condensed matter calculations to evaluate light harvesting abilities of HCN-based polymers (Lunine et al., Reference Lunine, Meadows, Arney, Schmidt and Des Marias2020; Rahm et al., Reference Rahm, Lunine, Usher and Shalloway2016), and molecular dynamics simulation and phonon spectra calculations to evaluate kinetic and thermodynamic stability of polarity-inverted cell membranes operable in Titan’s cold hydrocarbon lakes and seas (Sandström and Rahm, Reference Sandström and Rahm2020; Stevenson et al., Reference Stevenson, Lunine and Clancy2015). These latter studies all exemplify the application of quantum mechanical modeling to investigate materials based on H, C, and N, and their potential astrobiological role in cryogenic environments far removed from those of the Earth. In what follows, we instead computationally explore the plausibility of sulfur and phosphorus-rich materials in warmer environments.

Results and discussion

Model description

Figure 3 shows the computational model, 1, representing a hypothetical poly (phosphoric sulfonic ester). Our model of the polymer is chosen to be cyclic to avoid electronic and structural effects arising due to end-group functionality that are cumbersome to describe (Sandström et al., Reference Sandström, Izquierdo-Ruiz, Cappelletti, Dogan, Sharma, Bailey and Rahm2024). In other words, while the model is molecular it is also intended to emulate a long-chain polymer. The S4-symmetric 1, used for our thermodynamic and vibrational analyses, is devoid of ring strain and exhibits the lowest Gibbs free energy per repeat unit among several screened cyclic oligomers while not featuring intramolecular hydrogen bonding (see Figure S1). It is therefore a reasonable proxy for a linear chain. The hydrogen atoms serve as placeholders for potentially large R-groups.

Figure 3. Computational models of an R-substituted poly (phosphoric sulfonic ester). 1) S4-symmetric cyclic tetramer. 2) Hypothetical monomer unit, analogous to an amino acid in our comparison with polypeptides.

Also shown in Figure 3 is monomer unit 2, a hypothetical precursor to the envisioned polymer chain. This structure facilitates estimates of bond strengths and enables a direct comparison with amino acids, the monomer units of polypeptides. However, as we will discuss, 2 need not be the only viable feedstock molecule for forming 1 or related structures.

All structures, energies, and properties are calculated using density functional theory (DFT), combined with algorithms for conformational sampling and methods for implicit consideration of sulfuric acid solvation effects, the details of which are provided in the methods section.

The thermodynamics of formation of a Venusian polypeptide analog

Polypeptide synthesis is fundamental to biochemistry and proceeds through dehydration, i.e., via the elimination of one water molecule (from the reactants) per reaction step. Le Chatelier’s principle tells us that because water is formed, dehydration processes are penalized in aqueous conditions. Indeed, unaided aqueous polymerization of amino acids is thermodynamically unfavored by a positive Gibbs free energy change of 3–5 kcal/mol (Kitadai et al., Reference Kitadai, Yokoyama and Nakashima2011; Lehninger, Reference Lehninger1971), and the question of how prebiotic polypeptide synthesis occurs is still unsolved. In living systems, polypeptides are made through a combination of enzymatic catalysis and the utilization of energy-rich substrates (e.g., ATP). How does our hypothetical phosphoric sulfonic ester polypeptide analog compare?

To find out, we calculated the energetics of sequential insertion of our envisioned monomer 2, into expanding cyclic polymers akin to 1, i.e.,

(1) $$ \mathbf{2}+{(\mathrm{S}\mathrm{O}}_3{\mathrm{POOR})}_{\mathrm{n}}\to {(\mathrm{S}\mathrm{O}}_3{\mathrm{POOR})}_{\mathrm{n}+1}+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O} $$

where $ {\left({SO}_3 POOR\right)}_n $ denotes a cyclic polymer composed of n monomer units. The computed Gibbs free energy of reaction, ΔGr, is provided for n = 1–4 in Supplementary Table S2. Small cycles such as dimers and trimers are penalized by ring-strain, whereas ΔGr approaches ≈ −1 kcal/mol for larger structures, such as 1, used here as a proxy for longer chains. Under Venus’s cloud-deck conditions, polymer elongation is therefore predicted to be near-thermoneutral to mildly exergonic. This contrasts with peptide oligomerization in aqueous media, which is thermodynamically uphill.

Although the formal condensation chemistry and thermodynamic profiles are broadly analogous, there are notable structural differences: a phosphoric–sulfonic repeat unit has six rotatable bonds in its backbone and first substituents, versus three in a peptide (Figure 1). The increased torsional flexibility, together with the uncertain nature of pendant side chains in the heteropolymer, may be more likely to disrupt backbone regularity.

Our dehydration polymerization in reaction 1 assumes the availability of 2. But might this hypothetical monomer feasibly form in the Venusian atmosphere? As a limited test of this hypothesis, we evaluate a selection of reactions involving plausible phosphorous- and sulfur-bearing feedstock, H3PO4, SO3, or HPO3:

(2) $$ {\mathrm{H}}_3{\mathrm{PO}}_4+{\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{SO}}_4\to \mathbf{2}+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\hskip2em \Delta {G}_r^0=1kcal/mol $$
(3) $$ {\mathrm{H}}_3{\mathrm{PO}}_4+{\mathrm{SO}}_3\to \mathbf{2}\hskip5.24em \Delta {G}_r^0=-3kcal/mol $$
(4) $$ \mathrm{H}\mathrm{P}{\mathrm{O}}_3+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{O}}_4\to \mathbf{2}\hskip5em \Delta {G}_r^0=-23kcal/mol $$

The exergonic nature of reactions 3–4 suggest that formation of 2 can be spontaneous provided that suitable feedstock molecules are present. Reactions 5–7 are alternative expressions for the reactive potential of H3PO4, SO3, and HPO3, in which they formally combine to directly produce our model polymer 1:

(5) $$ \mathrm{H}\mathrm{P}{\mathrm{O}}_3+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{O}}_4\to \frac{1}{4}\ \mathbf{1}+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\hskip2.00em \Delta {G}_r^0=-21kcal/mol $$
(6) $$ \mathrm{H}\mathrm{P}{\mathrm{O}}_3+\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{O}}_3\to \frac{1}{4}\ \mathbf{1}\hskip6.00em \Delta {G}_r^0=-25kcal/mol $$
(7) $$ {\mathrm{H}}_3\mathrm{P}{\mathrm{O}}_4+\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{O}}_3\to \frac{1}{4}\ \mathbf{1}+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\hskip4.00em \Delta {G}_r^0=-1kcal/mol $$

These estimates support the thermodynamic plausibility of forming both monomeric and polymeric phosphorus-sulfur compounds, assuming the availability of the precursor species. While the direct detection of H3PO4, HPO3, or other phosphorus carriers remains elusive, earlier Vega/Venera analyses suggested trace levels of phosphorus may be present in aerosols (Andrejchikov et al., Reference Andrejchikov, Akhmetshin, Korchuganov, Mukhin, Ogorodnikov, Petryanov and Skitovich1987), likely as phosphoric acid (Esposito et al., Reference Esposito, Bertaux, Krasnopolsky, Moroz and Zasova2022b). More recently, the controversial detection of phosphine (Greaves et al., Reference Greaves, Richards, Bains, Rimmer, Clements, Seager, Petkowski, Sousa-Silva, Ranjan and Fraser2021, Reference Greaves, Richards, Bains, Rimmer, Sagawa, Clements, Seager, Petkowski, Sousa-Silva, Ranjan, Drabek-Maunder, Fraser, Cartwright, Mueller-Wodarg, Zhan, Friberg, Coulson, Lee and Hoge2020) represent a modern line of evidence for volatile and aerosol-associated phosphorus species.

Polymerization reactions in the highly acidic Venusian cloud decks are unlikely to occur in isolation. Instead, they would be embedded within a broader network of acid-catalyzed, pH-sensitive reaction equilibria, many of which remain poorly constrained. Since developing a complete kinetic or equilibrium model of such networks lies beyond the scope of this study, we again stress the approximate nature of our predictions. Reactions 8–9 are examples of dehydration processes that could help drive polymer formation by removing water from the environment:

(8) $$ {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}+\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{O}}_3\to {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{O}}_4\hskip5.00em \Delta {G}_r^0=-4kcal/mol $$
(9) $$ 2\ {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}+\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{O}}_3\to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{O}}_4^{-}+{\mathrm{H}}_3{\mathrm{O}}^{+}\hskip2.00em \Delta {G}_r^0=4kcal/mol $$

Notably, while reaction 9 is exergonic and proceeds without a barrier under Earth-like aqueous conditions (e.g. (Meijer and Sprik, Reference Meijer and Sprik1998), our Venus-adjusted thermodynamic model, which incorporates low water activity corrections ( $ {a}_{water}\le 0.0004 $ ) (Arney et al., Reference Arney, Meadows, Crisp, Schmidt, Bailey and Robinson2014; Donahue and Hodges, Reference Donahue and Hodges1992; Hallsworth et al., Reference Hallsworth, Koop, Dallas, Zorzano, Burkhardt, Golyshina, Martín-Torres, Dymond, Ball and McKay2021; Krasnopolsky, Reference Krasnopolsky2015) (see Methods), predicts it to be slightly endergonic. This difference may reflect computational limitations, such as errors in the predicted solvation energies of ions, or may be a true reflection of the extreme desiccation in the Venusian clouds. In either case, the materials described here may well be susceptible to hydrolysis. Reaction 10 represents the decomposition thermodynamics of the cyclic tetramer model 1 in the presence of water:

(10) $$ \frac{1}{4}\ \mathbf{1}+2{\ \mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\to {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{O}}_4+{\mathrm{H}}_3\mathrm{P}{\mathrm{O}}_4\hskip2.00em \Delta {G}_r^0=-3kcal/mol $$

While reaction 10, and several other reactions calculated as spontaneous ( $ \Delta G $ < 0), this says little about reaction rates. Indeed, thermodynamics is but one side of the coin of chemistry, the other being reactivity, kinetic stability.

Kinetic stability and reactivity

One proxy for reactivity is a molecule’s ability to accept and donate electrons. We estimate the gas phase ionization potential (IP) and electron affinity (EA) of polymer model 1 as ~11.2 eV and ~ 1.2 eV, respectively. These values indicate that polymeric phosphoric sulfonic esters are reluctant to engage in oxidative and reductive processes, reducing the likelihood of bond cleavage via homolytic or heterolytic pathways that involve radical or ionic intermediates.

To estimate the strength of the weakest S–O and P–O bond strengths in an R-substituted poly (phosphoric sulfonic ester), we turn to a simpler model, our imagined monomer, 2:

(11) $$ \mathbf{2}\to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{O}}_3+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{P}{\mathrm{O}}_4\hskip2.00em \mathrm{S}-\mathrm{O}\ \mathrm{b}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\ \hskip2.00em \Delta {H}_r^0=60kcal/mol $$
(12) $$ \mathbf{2}\to \mathrm{H}\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{O}}_4^{-}+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{P}{\mathrm{O}}_3^{+}\hskip2em \mathrm{P}-\mathrm{O}\ \mathrm{b}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{d}\ \hskip2.00em \Delta {H}_r^0=51kcal/mol $$

where reactions 11–12 correspond to homolytic and heterolytic bond cleavage, respectively. Detailed bond dissociation energies for all cleavage pathways are provided in Supplementary Table S1. Note that we use relative enthalpies as our estimate of dissociation barriers, not the relative free Gibbs energy. We do so because the entropic gain associated with an increased number of rotational and translational degrees of freedom upon dissociation is only fully realized after the bond is broken. The relative enthalpy of the separated fragments in reactions 11–12 therefore represents an upper estimate of the real Gibbs free energy barriers.

We attribute the preference for P–O cleavage, reaction 12, to a large stabilization of the formed charged fragments from the surrounding polar environment. Our estimated 50 kcal/mol dissociation energy estimate for the weakest bond of 2 is large enough to support a substantial kinetic stability of the proposed structures at temperature conditions akin to the Venusian cloud decks. We can make this inference by calculating the timescale of decomposition using the Eyring equation, assuming first-order reaction kinetics. At ambient conditions, a reaction barrier of 50 kcal/mol translates into a reaction half-life exceeding the lifetime of the universe, while at 300 °C this timescale is reduced to the order of weeks.

While the bonds inherent to these systems are predicted to be strong, polymers akin to 1 might still undergo facile decomposition through a range of more complex reaction pathways, including hydrolysis already discussed. As such, reaction pathways are likely to incorporate extensive solvent interactions, e.g., involving proton transfer and ion coordination; they are arguably best explored computationally using targeted molecular dynamics simulations – a task outside the scope of this study.

Besides solvation effects, other environmental effects could also affect reaction rates. For example, mineral aerosols or suspended particulates might catalyze bond formation just as clay minerals are thought to facilitate oligomerization of nucleotides (Ferris and Ertem, Reference Ferris and Ertem1992) or peptide oligomerization on the early Earth (Kitadai et al., Reference Kitadai, Yokoyama and Nakashima2011). Likewise, UV-driven radical chemistry, prevalent in Venus’s upper atmosphere, could promote bond formation or breakage (Mills et al., Reference Mills, Esposito and Yung2007). Nevertheless, as both sulfur and phosphorus are already maximally oxidized, we can assert with some confidence that oxidative degradation is unlikely.

In addition to hydrolysis and thermal cleavage, phosphate- and sulfonate-ester linkages are susceptible to transesterification, a dynamic exchange that could affect polymer persistence under Venus’s cloud-deck conditions. Such exchange reactions are likely to proceed faster than complete decomposition routes, and could reshuffle chain lengths, in some cases extending and in others truncating the polymer.

Ultimately, the plausibility of polymer growth depends not only on favorable thermodynamics but also on whether reactive feedstocks attain steady-state concentrations sufficient for productive kinetics. Venusian cloud droplets have characteristic radii of ~1 μm (Hallsworth et al., Reference Hallsworth, Koop, Dallas, Zorzano, Burkhardt, Golyshina, Martín-Torres, Dymond, Ball and McKay2021). For sulfur feedstocks, limitations are unlikely since the droplets themselves are concentrated sulfuric acid, and the ambient atmosphere contains SO2 at ~150 ppm (Petkowski et al., Reference Petkowski, Seager, Grinspoon, Bains, Ranjan, Rimmer, Buchanan, Agrawal, Mogul and Carr2024). In a 1 μm droplet, a single molecule corresponds to ~0.40 nM; a droplet-sized volume of gas at 150 ppm contains ~1.5 x 104 SO2 molecules, so incorporation of even a modest fraction yields droplet concentration in the μM range. By contrast, phosphorus availability remains uncertain; at ppb–ppm gas-phase levels, instantaneous equilibration with only a droplet-sized gas volume would imply tens of pM to tens of nM (up to low μM at the higher end). mM-level concentrations would require efficient cumulative scavenging over time, dissolution of particulate P, or in-droplet production. These estimates are necessarily speculative because steady-state values depend on poorly constrained production and loss rates, solubilities, and gas–liquid partitioning efficiencies for each feedstock species.

A summary of all studied reactions is provided in Supplementary Table S2.

Detection characteristics

The feasibility of detecting R-substituted poly(phosphoric sulfonic esters) or related compounds in the Venusian atmosphere depends on their concentration, physical state, and spectroscopic features. The absence of conjugated π-systems in the studied molecules means that no strong absorbance is expected in the visible region.

Our electronic (UV–Vis) calculations predict peak absorbance near 160–180 nm, with very little intensity beyond 220 nm (Supplementary Figure S2). This makes the candidate polymer an unlikely contributor to Venus’s mysterious UV absorber, which exhibits significant extinction in the 320–400 nm range (Titov et al., Reference Titov, Ignatiev, McGouldrick, Wilquet and Wilson2018). The lack of absorption at near-visible UV wavelengths does not undermine our hypothesis that these materials may act as polypeptide analogs. In contrast, it aligns with biological backbone polymers evolving to minimize photodegradation. We note, however, that side chain substitution (i.e., identity of R) could significantly alter the photophysical properties of these molecules and polymers.

The calculated infrared (IR) spectrum of 1 (Supplementary Figure S3) features a dense array of S–O and P–O stretching modes between 400 and 1600 cm−1, which are listed in Table 2. We focus our analysis on stretching vibrations because they offer the clearest functional-group fingerprints and occupy relatively uncluttered spectral windows in the fingerprint region. Bending modes of 1 mostly lie below 700 cm−1, which is usually a congested window for a mixed sample, complicating comparison to reference molecules. We note that the stretching frequencies of P=O and S=O bonds of 1 that are not part of the backbone are modestly blue-shifted relative to those in phosphoric and sulfuric acid, while the P–O and S–O single bonded stretching modes belonging to the backbone are slightly red-shifted.

Table 2. Calculated stretching frequencies of 1, H2SO4, H3PO4, SO3, and SO2 alongside a selection of literature data

a B3LYP-D3(BJ)/6–31 + G(d,p) (unscaled).

b IR intensity shown as w = weak (<100 a.u.), m = medium (100–300 a.u.), and s = strong (>300 a.u.).

c Transmission IR of aqueous H2SO4 at room temperature (Walrafen and Dodd, Reference Walrafen and Dodd1961).

d ATR-IR spectrum of 18 M liquid H2SO4 at room temperature (Horn and Jessica Sully, Reference Horn and Jessica Sully1999).

e Vapor phase IR spectra of H2SO4 at 150 °C (Hintze et al., Reference Hintze, Kjaergaard, Vaida and Burkholder2003).

f Aqueous H3PO4 at 23 °C (Rudolph, Reference Rudolph2010).

g Aqueous H3PO4 (Chapman and Thirlwell, Reference Chapman and Thirlwell1964).

h NIST.

The polymer’s most distinctive fingerprints are a pair of strong composite P–O–S stretches centered at 845 cm−1 and 861 cm−1; none of the reference molecules shown in Table 2 exhibits absorptions in this narrow window, making these bands useful for potentially recognizing P–O–S linkages in a mixed Venus-cloud spectrum. Note however, that while predicted relative shifts are instructive, we caution from comparing absolute stretching frequencies listed in Table 2 directly with experiment. Quantum chemical calculations naturally suffer from a range of inherent approximations, which in our case include the choice of density functional, the implicit solvent modeling, limited conformational sampling, and the harmonic approximation used to derive frequencies. Furthermore, even with high-resolution in situ instruments, overlap between multiple bands and scattering in the clouds and atmosphere is likely to hinder unambiguous spectral assignments using vibrational spectroscopy alone.

In practice, in tandem use of vibrational spectroscopy and mass spectrometry is likely the most feasible methods for detecting the envisioned materials, or related structures in the Venusian atmosphere.

Relevance to Venus missions

Can polymers akin to 1 be detected by planned missions to Venus? Unlikely. Detecting non-volatile P–O–S polymers like 1 will be exceptionally challenging for the next generation of Venus missions. As summarized in Supplementary Table S3, most payloads are optimized for volatile gases and surface mineralogy; none include mid-IR or Raman capabilities needed to resolve the diagnostic P=O, S=O, or P–O–S stretches of condensed-phase materials. Quadrupole mass spectrometers slated to fly (e.g., on DAVINCI) could register low-mass fragments or monomers, but unit-mass resolution and reliance on hard electron-ionization severely limit recognition of intact macromolecules. In short, present instruments favor gas-phase species and leave a sensitivity gap for complex polymers, highlighting the need for future soft-ionization mass spectrometry or mid-IR spectrometers if such materials are to be detected directly. Including a mid-IR spectrometer could prove particularly worthwhile, given the relatively small mass cost.

Conclusion

This work constitutes a computational exploration of hypothetical sulfur- and phosphorus-rich polymers as polypeptide analogs in Venus’s acidic cloud decks. The aim is not to propose details for the emergence of alternative heteropolymers on Venus, nor to argue that P–O–S-based polymers are the most likely materials of biological relevance in such environments. Rather, we share an example of computational astrobiology meant to illustrate how quantum chemical modeling can be used to evaluate the basic feasibility of hypothetical biopolymer analogs in exotic environments.

Using quantum chemical methods, we have shown that R-substituted poly(phosphoric sulfonic esters) could form spontaneously from plausible atmospheric constituents under Venusian conditions, and that such materials may be sufficiently kinetically stable to persist in the lower cloud decks. Their formation compares favorably to polypeptides in polar solution, and their predicted vibrational spectra exhibit characteristic P–O–S stretching modes that could serve as a potential diagnostic marker. We unfortunately conclude that currently planned missions to Venus are unlikely to conclusively detect these kinds of materials, would they be present, or, indeed, any macromolecular species of potential biological relevance. Future instrumentation capable of mid-IR or Raman spectroscopy, or soft ionization mass spectrometry, would likely be necessary for probing the molecular signatures of non-volatile sulfur/phosphorus-based polymers.

The use of quantum chemical calculations to vet speculative ideas before committing to resource-intensive modeling or experiments is attractive. However, deciding which hypotheses to pursue and to what depth is not trivial. While our study outlines basic stability and detection characteristics, a more comprehensive assessment of our target polymer’s persistence (e.g., resistance to hydrolysis) would require kinetic modeling of formation and degradation pathways alongside dynamic acid–base equilibria under ultralow water activity. Additional variables such as cation coordination, backbone or side-chain driven folding, protonation-state dependent reactivity, and the prospect of enzyme-like catalysis in concentrated sulfuric acid further complicate the picture, far beyond the scope of this study.

More broadly, this work reiterates the value of reframing our search for life by challenging carbon chauvinism – the assumption that life must resemble Earth-based carbon biochemistry. By illustrating how plausible, metastable biopolymer analogs could emerge and persist in a radically different environment, we emphasize the need to expand our chemical imagination in the search for agnostic biosignatures. Venus, like Saturn’s moon Titan, can serve as a test bed for exploring the limits of alternative chemistries (e.g., (Rahm et al., Reference Rahm, Lunine, Usher and Shalloway2016; H. Sandström and Rahm, Reference Sandström and Rahm2020; Stevenson et al., Reference Stevenson, Lunine and Clancy2015), reminding us that the search for life should look beyond familiar paradigms. Embracing this broader lens means prioritizing more agnostic astrobiology mission payloads – tools capable of detecting the unexpected – so that when we peer into alien environments, we are equipped to recognize life, however strange its chemistry may be.

Methods

All calculations were performed using the hybrid-exchange-correlation functional B3LYP (Becke, 3-parameter, Lee–Yang–Parr) (Becke, Reference Becke1993; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Yang and Parr1988), combined with the D3BJ dispersion correction (Grimme et al., Reference Grimme, Antony, Ehrlich and Krieg2010, Reference Grimme, Ehrlich and Goerigk2011) and the 6–31 + G(d,p) basis set, as implemented in Gaussian 16, revision B.01 (Frisch et al., Reference Frisch, Trucks, Schlegel, Scuseria, Robb, Cheeseman, Scalmani, Barone, Petersson, Nakatsuji, Li, Caricato, Marenich, Bloino, Janesko, Gomperts, Mennucci, Hratchian, Ortiz, Izmaylov, Sonnenberg, Williams-Young, Ding, Lipparini, Egidi, Goings, Peng, Petrone, Henderson, Ranasinghe, Zakrzewski, Gao, Rega, Zheng, Liang, Hada, Ehara, Toyota, Fukuda, Hasegawa, Ishida, Nakajima, Honda, Kitao, Nakai, Vreven, Throssell, Montgomery, Peralta, Ogliaro, Bearpark, Heyd, Brothers, Kudin, Staroverov, Keith, Kobayashi, Normand, Raghavachari, Rendell, Burant, Iyengar, Tomasi, Cossi, Millam, Klene, Adamo, Cammi, Ochterski, Martin, Morokuma, Farkas, Foresman and Fox2017). Solvent effects were described implicitly using the Solvation Model based on Density (SMD) (Marenich et al., Reference Marenich, Cramer and Truhlar2009) parametrized for water, but with the dielectric constant modified to 100, approximating that of concentrated sulfuric acid (Gillespie and Cole, Reference Gillespie and Cole1956). Our implicit modeling of solvation effects neglects explicit entropic and enthalpic contributions from solvent structuring and ion coordination, and it cannot capture local solvent reorganization around reactive groups. More advanced treatments, such as QM/MM molecular dynamics simulations, could account for these effects more rigorously, but remain outside the scope of the present exploratory study.

Conformational sampling was performed using AutodE (Young et al., Reference Young, Silcock, Sterling and Duarte2021). Frequency analyses were performed on all structures to verify the absence of imaginary modes, to evaluate thermal and entropic corrections to the electronic energy, and to generate infrared (IR) spectra. Ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectra were calculated using time-dependent (TD) DFT (Runge and Gross, Reference Runge and Gross1984), with excitation energies obtained from the lowest 50 singlet and triplet states.

Gibbs free energies are reported for 298.15 K and corrected to standard state concentrations of 1 M for all species, except for sulfuric acid and water, which are referenced to conditions representative of the Venusian cloud decks. We adopt a sulfuric acid concentration of 16.3 M and a water activity of 0.000533 (dimensionless), based on the cloud droplet composition at 25 °C reported by Hallsworth et al. (Reference Hallsworth, Koop, Dallas, Zorzano, Burkhardt, Golyshina, Martín-Torres, Dymond, Ball and McKay2021). While atmospheric conditions on Venus vary with altitude, this midpoint estimate provides a chemically relevant reference point for assessing thermodynamic feasibility.

Gibbs energies corrections for non-gas-phase standard states were obtained using the expression:

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{rcl}\varDelta {G}_{\mathrm{corrected}}& =& \varDelta {G}^0\left(1 atm\right)+ RT{\sum}_j{v}_j\mathit{\ln}{a}_j\\ {}& =& \varDelta {G}^0\left(1 atm\right)+ RT{\sum}_j{v}_j\mathit{\ln}\frac{c_{\mathrm{j}}^{\mathrm{target}}}{c^{\mathrm{gas}}}\end{array}} $$

where $ \Delta {G}^o\left(1\;\mathrm{atm}\right) $ is the sum of electronic and thermal free energies obtained from a frequency analysis, R is the gas constant ( $ 1.987\times {10}^{-3}\ \mathrm{k}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{l}{\ \mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{l}}^{-1}\ {\mathrm{K}}^{-1} $ ), T is the temperature (298.15 K), $ {v}_j $ is the stoichiometric coefficient of species $ j $ (positive for products, negative for reactants), $ {a}_j $ is the activity of species $ j $ , $ {c}_j^{\mathrm{target}} $ is the chosen standard concentration for species $ j $ , and $ {c}^{\mathrm{gas}}= $ 1 atm/RT = 0.0409 M at 298.15 K.

Open peer review

To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/qrd.2025.10012.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/qrd.2025.10012.

Data availability statement

All raw computational output files with necessary numerical data to reproduce any of the calculations in this work are openly available on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15881845.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Purdue Community Cluster Program as described in (McCartney et al., Reference McCartney, Hacker and Yang2014). We gratefully acknowledge the constructive feedback provided by the four anonymous reviewers, which strengthened the quality of this work.

Author contribution

Conceptualization: MR, Writing – review and editing: IM, MR, SAA, JH, Supervision of research: MR, FIR, HS. Investigation & Formal Analysis: IM, SAA, JH, EM, EH, KK, FN, AS, FIR, HS, MR.

Financial support

We thank Chalmers Gender Initiative for Excellence, Chalmers Area of Advance Nano, and Jonathan Tan and the CASSUM fellowship, for funding parts of this research. Our research relied on computational resources provided by the National Academic Infrastructure for Supercomputing in Sweden (NAISS) at C3SE and NSC partially funded by the Swedish research council through grant agreement no. 2022–06725 and in part through the Negishi cluster, operated by the Rosen Center for Advanced Computing at Purdue University.

Competing interest

The authors declare none.

Footnotes

Fernando Izquierdo-Ruiz, Current address: Department of Physical Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Hilda Sandström, Current address: Department of Applied Physics, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

References

Alenaizan, A, Barnett, JL, Hud, NV, Sherrill, CD and Petrov, AS (2021) The proto-nucleic acid builder: A software tool for constructing nucleic acid analogs. Nucleic Acids Research 49(1), 7989. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrejchikov, BM, Akhmetshin, IK, Korchuganov, BN, Mukhin, LM, Ogorodnikov, BI, Petryanov, IV and Skitovich, VI (1987) Radiometric analysis of aerosol in the Venus clouds with the automatic interplanetary stations Vega 1 and Vega 2. Kosmicheskie Issledovaniia 25, 721736. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987KosIs..25..721A/abstractGoogle Scholar
Arney, G, Meadows, V, Crisp, D, Schmidt, SJ, Bailey, J and Robinson, T (2014) Spatially resolved measurements of H2O, HCl, CO, OCS, SO2, cloud opacity, and acid concentration in the Venus near-infrared spectral windows. Journal of Geophysical Research. Planets 119(8), 18601891. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014je004662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bains, W, Petkowski, JJ, Rimmer, PB and Seager, S (2021) Production of ammonia makes Venusian clouds habitable and explains observed cloud-level chemical anomalies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118(52), e2110889118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2110889118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bains, W, Petkowski, JJ and Seager, S (2023) Venus’ atmospheric chemistry and cloud characteristics are compatible with Venusian life. In arXiv [astro-ph.EP]. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07358Google Scholar
Bains, W, Petkowski, JJ and Seager, S (2024) Alternative solvents for life: Framework for evaluation, current status, and future research. Astrobiology 24(12), 12311256. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2024.0004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker-Austin, C and Dopson, M (2007) Life in acid: pH homeostasis in acidophiles. Trends in Microbiology 15(4), 165171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2007.02.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrie Johnson, D and Hallberg, KB (2009) Carbon, iron and sulfur metabolism in acidophilic micro-organisms. Advances in Microbial Physiology 54, 201255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2911(08)00003-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becke, AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. The Journal of Chemical Physics 98(7), 56485652. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierson, CJ and Zhang, X (2020) Chemical cycling in the Venusian atmosphere: A full photochemical model from the surface to 110 km. Journal of Geophysical Research. Planets 125(7), e2019JE006159. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019je006159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, SM, Mayer-Bacon, C and Freeland, S (2023) Xeno amino acids: A look into biochemistry as we do not know it. Life (Basel, Switzerland) 13(12), 2281. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13122281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaban, G, Colombano, S, Scargle, J, New Michael, H, Pohorille, A and Wilson, MA (2002) Research in Computational Astrobiology. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20030111834/downloads/20030111834.pdfGoogle Scholar
Chapman, AC and Thirlwell, LE (1964) Spectra of phosphorus compounds—I the infra-red spectra of orthophosphates. Spectrochimica Acta 20(6), 937947. https://doi.org/10.1016/0371-1951(64)80094-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, WW and Hengge, AC (2006) Enzymatic mechanisms of phosphate and sulfate transfer. Chemical Reviews 106(8), 32523278. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050287oCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockell, CS (1999) Life on Venus. Planetary and Space Science 47(12), 14871501. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0032-0633(99)00036-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dartnell, LR, Nordheim, TA, Patel, MR, Mason, JP, Coates, AJ and Jones, GH (2015) Constraints on a potential aerial biosphere on Venus: I. Cosmic rays. Icarus 257, 396405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.05.006Google Scholar
de Oliveira, MRR, Gil, PJS and Ghail, R (2018) A novel orbiter mission concept for venus with the EnVision proposal. Acta Astronautica 148, 260267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.05.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domagal-Goldman, SD, Wright, KE, Adamala, K, Arina de la Rubia, L, Bond, J, Dartnell, LR, Goldman, AD, Lynch, K, Naud, M-E, Paulino-Lima, IG, Singer, K, Walther-Antonio, M, Abrevaya, XC, Anderson, R, Arney, G, Atri, D, Azúa-Bustos, , Bowman, JS, Brazelton, WJ and Wong, T (2016) The astrobiology primer v2.0. Astrobiology 16(8), 561653. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2015.1460Google ScholarPubMed
Donahue, TM and Hodges, RR (1992) Past and present water budget of Venus. Journal of Geophysical Research 97(E4), 6083. https://doi.org/10.1029/92je00343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duzdevich, D, Nisler, C, Petkowski, JJ, Bains, W, Kaminsky, CK, Szostak, JW and Seager, S (2024) Simple lipids form stable higher-order structures in concentrated sulfuric acid. In arXiv [physics.chem-ph]. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12982Google Scholar
Eigner, AA, Wrass, JP, Smith, EL, Knutson, CC and Phillips, JA (2009) Structural properties of CH3CN–SO2 in the gas phase and condensed-phase media via density functional theory and infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Molecular Structure 919(1–3), 312320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2008.09.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, et al. (2022a) The clouds and hazes of Venus. In Hunten, DM, Colin, L, Donahue, TM and Moroz, VI (eds.), Venus. University of Arizona Press, pp. 484564.Google Scholar
Esposito, LW, Bertaux, J-L, Krasnopolsky, V, Moroz, VI and Zasova, LV (2022b) Chemistry of lower atmosphere and clouds. In Venus II. University of Arizona Press, pp. 415458. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv27tct5m.18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, JP and Ertem, G (1992) Oligomerization of ribonucleotides on montmorillonite: Reaction of the 5′-phosphorimidazolide of adenosine. Science (New York, N.Y.) 257(5075), 13871389. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1529338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, R, Mandy, C, Hunter, R, Mosleh, E, Sinclair, D, Beck, P, Seager, S, Petkowski, JJ, Carr, CE, Grinspoon, DH, Baumgardner, D, On Behalf of the Rocket Lab Venus Team and On Behalf of the Rocket Lab Venus Team (2022) Rocket Lab mission to Venus. Aerospace 9(8), 445. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9080445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, MJ, Trucks, GW, Schlegel, HB, Scuseria, GE, Robb, MA, Cheeseman, JR, Scalmani, G, Barone, V, Petersson, GA, Nakatsuji, H, Li, X, Caricato, M, Marenich, AV, Bloino, J, Janesko, BG, Gomperts, R, Mennucci, B, Hratchian, HP, Ortiz, JV, Izmaylov, AF, Sonnenberg, JL, Williams-Young, D, Ding, F, Lipparini, F, Egidi, F, Goings, J, Peng, B, Petrone, A, Henderson, T, Ranasinghe, D, Zakrzewski, VG, Gao, J, Rega, N, Zheng, G, Liang, W, Hada, M, Ehara, M, Toyota, K, Fukuda, R, Hasegawa, J, Ishida, M, Nakajima, T, Honda, Y, Kitao, O, Nakai, H, Vreven, T, Throssell, K, Montgomery, JA Jr, Peralta, JE, Ogliaro, F, Bearpark, MJ, Heyd, JJ, Brothers, EN, Kudin, KN, Staroverov, VN, Keith, TA, Kobayashi, R, Normand, J, Raghavachari, K, Rendell, AP, Burant, JC, Iyengar, SS, Tomasi, J, Cossi, M, Millam, JM, Klene, M, Adamo, C, Cammi, R, Ochterski, JW, Martin, RL, Morokuma, K, Farkas, O, Foresman, JB, Fox, DJ (2017) Gaussian 16, Revision B.01.Google Scholar
Garvin, JB, Getty, SA, Arney, GN, Johnson, NM, Kohler, E, Schwer, KO, Sekerak, M, Bartels, A, Saylor, RS, Elliott, VE, Goodloe, CS, Garrison, MB, Cottini, V, Izenberg, N, Lorenz, R, Malespin, CA, Ravine, M, Webster, CR, Atkinson, DH and Zolotov, M (2022) Revealing the mysteries of Venus: The DAVINCI mission. The Planetary Science Journal 3(5), 117. https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ac63c2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacometti, A (2024) Can life exist without water? A data-driven approach. In Studies in Big Data. Springer, pp. 103120). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0041-7_6Google Scholar
Gillespie, RJ and Cole, RH (1956) The dielectric constant of sulphuric acid. Transactions of the Faraday Society 52, 1325. https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9565201325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, JS, Richards, AMS, Bains, W, Rimmer, PB, Sagawa, H, Clements, DL, Seager, S, Petkowski, JJ, Sousa-Silva, C, Ranjan, S, Drabek-Maunder, E, Fraser, HJ, Cartwright, A, Mueller-Wodarg, I, Zhan, Z, Friberg, P, Coulson, I, Lee, E and Hoge, J (2020) Phosphine gas in the cloud decks of Venus. Nature Astronomy 5(7), 655664. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1174-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greaves, JS, Richards, AMS, Bains, W, Rimmer, PB, Clements, DL, Seager, S, Petkowski, JJ, Sousa-Silva, C, Ranjan, S and Fraser, HJ (2021) Reply to: No evidence of phosphine in the atmosphere of Venus from independent analyses. Nature Astronomy 5(7), 636639. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01424-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grefenstette, N, Chou, L, Colón-Santos, S, Fisher, TM, Mierzejewski, V, Nural, C, Sinhadc, P, Vidaurri, M, Vincent, L and Weng, MM (2024) Chapter 9: Life as we don’t know it. Astrobiology 24(S1), S186S201. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2021.0103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimme, S, Antony, J, Ehrlich, S and Krieg, H (2010) A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. The Journal of Chemical Physics 132(15), 154104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimme, S, Ehrlich, S and Goerigk, L (2011) Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. Journal of Computational Chemistry 32(7), 14561465. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21759CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grinspoon, D. H., & Bullock, M. A. (2007). Astrobiology and Venus exploration. In Exploring Venus as a Terrestrial Planet (pp. 191206). American Geophysical Union. https://doi.org/10.1029/176gm12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronstal, A (2024) In Memoriam: Andrzej Pohorille. NASA Astrobiology. https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/news/in-memoriam-andrzej-pohorille/Google Scholar
Günal, S, Hardman, R, Kopriva, S and Mueller, JW (2019) Sulfation pathways from red to green. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 294(33), 1229312312. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.REV119.007422CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallsworth, JE, Koop, T, Dallas, TD, Zorzano, M-P, Burkhardt, J, Golyshina, OV, Martín-Torres, J, Dymond, MK, Ball, P and McKay, CP (2021) Water activity in Venus’s uninhabitable clouds and other planetary atmospheres. Nature Astronomy 5(7), 665675. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-021-01391-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintze, PE, Kjaergaard, HG, Vaida, V and Burkholder, JB (2003) Vibrational and electronic spectroscopy of sulfuric acid vapor. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A 107(8), 11121118. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0263626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, JH, Hodges, RR, Donahue, TM and McElroy, MB (1980) Composition of the Venus lower atmosphere from the Pioneer Venus mass spectrometer. Journal of Geophysical Research 85(A13), 78827890. https://doi.org/10.1029/ja085ia13p07882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, AB and Jessica Sully, K (1999) ATR-IR spectroscopic studies of the formation of sulfuric acid and sulfuric acid monohydrate films. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics: PCCP 1(16), 38013806. https://doi.org/10.1039/a904544iCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izenberg, N., Gentry, D. M., Smith, D. J., Gilmore, M. S., Grinspoon, D., Bullock, M. A., Boston, P. J., & Słowik, G. P. (2021). The Venus life equation. Planetary/Astrobiology Decadal Survey Whitepapers, 53(4). https://doi.org/10.3847/25c2cfeb.ee5bd3d1Google Scholar
Johnson, NM and de Oliveira, MRR (2019) Venus atmospheric composition in situ data: A compilation. Earth and Space Science Hoboken, N.J. 6(7), 12991318. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EA000536CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamerlin, SCL, Sharma, PK, Prasad, RB and Warshel, A (2013) Why nature really chose phosphate. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 46(1), 1132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033583512000157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karvansara, , et al. (2023) Sulfur metabolism in cyanobacteria. In Mishra, AK and Singh, SS (eds.), Cyanobacteria. Academic Press, pp. 117157.Google Scholar
Kitadai, N, Yokoyama, T and Nakashima, S (2011) Hydration–dehydration interactions between glycine and anhydrous salts: Implications for a chemical evolution of life. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 75(21), 62856299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotsyurbenko, OR, Cordova, JA, Belov, AA, Cheptsov, VS, Kölbl, D, Khrunyk, YY, Kryuchkova, MO, Milojevic, T, Mogul, R, Sasaki, S, Słowik, GP, Snytnikov, V and Vorobyova, EA (2021) Exobiology of the Venusian clouds: New insights into habitability through terrestrial models and methods of detection. Astrobiology 21(10), 11861205. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2020.2296CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotsyurbenko, OR, Kompanichenko, VN, Brouchkov, AV, Khrunyk, YY, Karlov, SP, Sorokin, VV and Skladnev, DA (2024) Different scenarios for the origin and the subsequent succession of a hypothetical microbial community in the cloud layer of Venus. Astrobiology 24(4), 423441. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2022.0117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krasnopolsky, VA (2015) Vertical profiles of H2O, H2SO4, and sulfuric acid concentration at 45–75 km on Venus. Icarus 252, 327333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2015.01.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kun, A, Papp, B and Szathmáry, E (2008) Computational identification of obligatorily autocatalytic replicators embedded in metabolic networks. Genome Biology 9(3), R51. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2008-9-3-r51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C, Yang, W and Parr, RG (1988) Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Physical Review. B, Condensed Matter 37(2), 785789. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.37.785CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehninger, AL (1971) Bioenergetics (2nd ed.). Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Subs. of Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Limaye, SS, Mogul, R, Smith, DJ, Ansari, AH, Słowik, GP and Vaishampayan, P (2018) Venus’ spectral signatures and the potential for life in the clouds. Astrobiology 18(9), 11811198. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2017.1783CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Limaye, S, Bullock, MA, Baines, KH, Cockell, C, Cordova, JA, Cutts, JA, Gentry, D, Grinspoon, D, Head, J, Jessup, K-L, Kompanichenko, V, Lee, YJ, Mathies, R, Milojevic, T, Mogul, R, Pertzborn, RA, Rothschild, L, Sasaki, S, Schulze-Makuch, D, Way, MJ (2021) Venus, an astrobiology target. Planetary/Astrobiology Decadal Survey Whitepapers 53(4). https://doi.org/10.3847/25c2cfeb.32998123Google Scholar
Lovejoy, RW, Colwell, JH, Eggers, DF and Halsey, GD Jr (1962) Infrared spectrum and thermodynamic properties of gaseous sulfur trioxide. The Journal of Chemical Physics 36(3), 612617. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1732581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunine, et al. (2020). The astrobiology of titan. In Meadows, V, Arney, G, Schmidt, B, Des Marias, DJ (ed.), Planetary Astrobiology (pp. 247266). University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Lv, K-P, Norman, L and Li, Y-L (2017) Oxygen-free biochemistry: The putative CHN foundation for exotic life in a hydrocarbon world? Astrobiology 17(11), 11731181. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2016.1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenich, AV, Cramer, CJ and Truhlar, DG (2009) Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B 113(18), 63786396. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp810292nCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCartney, G, Hacker, T and Yang, B (2014, July 14) Empowering faculty: A campus cyberinfrastructure strategy for research communities. Educause Review.Google Scholar
Meijer, EJ and Sprik, M (1998) A density functional study of the addition of water to SO3 in the gas phase and in aqueous solution. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A 102(17), 28932898. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp972146zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meringer, M and Cleaves, HJ (2017) Exploring astrobiology using in silico molecular structure generation. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences 375(2109), 20160344. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0344Google ScholarPubMed
Mills, FP, Esposito, LW and Yung, YL (2007) Atmospheric composition, chemistry, and clouds. In Exploring Venus as a Terrestrial Planet. American Geophysical Union, pp. 73100. https://doi.org/10.1029/176gm06CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mogul, R, Limaye, SS, Lee, YJ and Pasillas, M (2021) Potential for phototrophy in Venus’ clouds. Astrobiology 21(10), 12371249. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2021.0032CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morowitz, H and Sagan, C (1967) Life in the clouds of Venus? Nature 215(5107), 12591260. https://doi.org/10.1038/2151259a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasek, MA, Gull, M and Herschy, B (2017) Phosphorylation on the early earth. Chemical Geology 475, 149170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, MR, Mason, JP, Nordheim, TA and Dartnell, LR (2022) Constraints on a potential aerial biosphere on Venus: II. Ultraviolet radiation. Icarus 373(114796), 114796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114796Google Scholar
Petkowski, JJ, Seager, MD, Bains, W and Seager, S (2024) General instability of dipeptides in concentrated sulfuric acid as relevant for the Venus cloud habitability. Scientific Reports 14(1), 17083. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67342-wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petkowski, JJ, Seager, S, Grinspoon, DH, Bains, W, Ranjan, S, Rimmer, PB, Buchanan, WP, Agrawal, R, Mogul, R and Carr, CE (2024) Astrobiological potential of Venus atmosphere chemical anomalies and other unexplained cloud properties. Astrobiology 24(4), 343370. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2022.0060CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohorille, A and Pratt, LR (1986) Theoretical methods for obtaining free energies of biomolecular equilibria in aqueous solutions. Methods in Enzymology 127, 6478. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(86)27007-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohorille, A and Wilson, MA (1993) Viewpoint 9--molecular structure of aqueous interfaces. Journal of Molecular Structure 284, 271298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-1280(93)87010-bCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohorille, A, Ross, WS and Tinoco, I (1990) DNA dynamics in aqueous solution: Opening the double helix. The International Journal of Supercomputer Applications 4(3), 8196. https://doi.org/10.1177/109434209000400309CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahm, M, Lunine, JI, Usher, DA and Shalloway, D (2016) Polymorphism and electronic structure of polyimine and its potential significance for prebiotic chemistry on titan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113(29), 81218126. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606634113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahm, M, Zeng, T and Hoffmann, R (2019) Electronegativity seen as the ground-state average valence electron binding energy. Journal of the American Chemical Society 141(1), 342351. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b10246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampelotto, PH (2010) The search for Life on other planets: Sulfur-based, silicon-based, ammonia-based Life. Journal of Cosmol, 5, 818827. http://plutao.sid.inpe.br/col/dpi.inpe.br/plutao@80/2010/06.29.20.11.27/doc/SearchForLife120.html.Google Scholar
Rudolph, W. W. (2010). Raman- and infrared-spectroscopic investigations of dilute aqueous phosphoric acid solutions. Dalton Transactions (Cambridge, England: 2003) 39(40), 96429653. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0dt00417kCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runge, E and Gross, EKU (1984) Density-functional theory for time-dependent systems. Physical Review Letters 52(12), 9971000. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.52.997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandström, H and Rahm, M (2020) Can polarity-inverted membranes self-assemble on Titan? Science Advances 6(4), eaax0272. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0272CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandström, H, Izquierdo-Ruiz, F, Cappelletti, M, Dogan, R, Sharma, S, Bailey, C and Rahm, M (2024) A thermodynamic landscape of hydrogen cyanide-derived molecules and polymers. ACS Earth & Space Chemistry 8(6), 12721280. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze-Makuch, D and Irwin, LN (2006) The prospect of alien life in exotic forms on other worlds. The Science of Nature 93(4), 155172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-005-0078-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulze-Makuch, D, Grinspoon, DH, Abbas, O, Irwin, LN and Bullock, MA (2004) A sulfur-based survival strategy for putative phototrophic life in the venusian atmosphere. Astrobiology 4(1), 1118. https://doi.org/10.1089/153110704773600203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seager, S, Petkowski, JJ, Gao, P, Bains, W, Bryan, NC, Ranjan, S and Greaves, J (2021) The Venusian lower atmosphere haze as a depot for desiccated microbial life: A proposed life cycle for persistence of the Venusian aerial biosphere. Astrobiology 21(10), 12061223. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2020.2244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seager, S, Petkowski, JJ, Carr, CE, Grinspoon, DH, Ehlmann, BL, Saikia, SJ, Agrawal, R, Buchanan, WP, Weber, MU, French, R, Klupar, P, Worden, SP, Baumgardner, D and Venus Life Finder Mission Team(2022) Venus Life Finder missions motivation and summary. Aerospace 9(7), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9070385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seager, MD, Seager, S, Bains, W and Petkowski, JJ (2024) Stability of 20 biogenic amino acids in concentrated sulfuric acid: Implications for the habitability of Venus’ clouds. Astrobiology 24(4), 386396. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2023.0082CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seager, S, Petkowski, JJ, Seager, MD, Grimes, JH, Zinsli, Z, Vollmer-Snarr, HR, Abd El-Rahman, MK, Wishart, DS, Lee, BL, Gautam, V, Herrington, L, Bains, W and Darrow, C (2024) Year-long stability of nucleic acid bases in concentrated sulfuric acid: Implications for the persistence of organic chemistry in Venus’ clouds. Life (Basel, Switzerland) 14(5), 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14050538Google ScholarPubMed
Smrekar, S, Hensley, S, Nybakken, R, Wallace, MS, Perkovic-Martin, D, You, T-H, Nunes, D, Brophy, J, Ely, T, Burt, E, Dyar, MD, Helbert, J, Miller, B, Hartley, J, Kallemeyn, P, Whitten, J, Iess, L, Mastrogiuseppe, M, Younis, M, Mazarico, E (2022, March 5) VERITAS (Venus emissivity, radio science, InSAR, topography, and spectroscopy): A discovery mission. In 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO). 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO), Big Sky, MT, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero53065.2022.9843269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, J, Lunine, J and Clancy, P (2015) Membrane alternatives in worlds without oxygen: Creation of an azotosome. Science Advances 1(1), e1400067. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400067CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundararajan, V (2021, November 15) Tradespace exploration of space system architecture and design for India’s shukrayaan-1, Venus orbiter mission. ASCEND 2021. ASCEND 2021, Las Vegas, Nevada & Virtual. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-4103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, FW, Svedhem, H and Head, JW (2018) Venus: The atmosphere, climate, surface, interior and near-space environment of an earth-like planet. Space Science Reviews 214(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0467-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titov, DV, Ignatiev, NI, McGouldrick, K, Wilquet, V and Wilson, CF (2018) Clouds and hazes of Venus. Space Science Reviews 214(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0552-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toner, JD and Catling, DC (2020) A carbonate-rich lake solution to the phosphate problem of the origin of life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117(2), 883888. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916109117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walrafen, GE and Dodd, DM (1961) Infra-red absorption spectra of concentrated aqueous solutions of sulphuric acid. Part 2.—H2SO4and HSO–4 vibrational fundamentals and estimates of (F°298·15—H°0)/T and S°298·15 for H2SO4gas. Transactions of the Faraday Society 57, 12861296. https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9615701286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasmund, K, Mußmann, M and Loy, A (2017) The life sulfuric: Microbial ecology of sulfur cycling in marine sediments. Environmental Microbiology Reports 9(4), 323344. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12538CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westheimer, FH (1981) Monomeric metaphosphates. Chemical Reviews 81(4), 313326. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00044a001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xavier, JC, Hordijk, W, Kauffman, S, Steel, M and Martin, WF (2020) Autocatalytic chemical networks at the origin of metabolism. Proceedings. Biological sciences 287(1922), 20192377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2377Google ScholarPubMed
Young, TA, Silcock, JJ, Sterling, AJ and Duarte, F (2021) AutodE: Automated calculation of reaction energy profiles— Application to organic and organometallic reactions. Angewandte Chemie (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) 133(8), 43124320. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202011941Google Scholar
Zasova, LV, Gorinov, DA, Eismont, NA, Kovalenko, ID, Abbakumov, AS and Bober, SA (2019) Venera-D: A design of an automatic space station for Venus exploration. Solar System Research 53(7), 506510. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0038094619070244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. A) An R-substituted poly (phosphoric sulfonic ester), a hypothetical class of Venusian heteropolymers imagined mimicking the structure of polypeptides. B) An R-substituted polypeptide, representative of the building blocks of life as we know it.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Selected examples of sulfur and phosphorus in biology (A-C), and in Venus-relevant conditions (D-E): A) 3′-phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS), the most common coenzyme in sulfur-group transfer reactions. B) Sulfoquinovosyl diacylglycerol (SQDG), a sulfolipid found in many photosynthetic organisms (Karvansara et al., 2023). C) A general phospholipid, where the R group can be replaced to form major components of cell membranes (e.g., phosphatidylcholine). D) The cyclic trimer phase of sulfur trioxide (γ-SO3). E) Polymeric phase of sulfur trioxide (α-SO3).

Figure 2

Table 1. Comparison of carbon, sulfur, and phosphorus

Figure 3

Figure 3. Computational models of an R-substituted poly (phosphoric sulfonic ester). 1) S4-symmetric cyclic tetramer. 2) Hypothetical monomer unit, analogous to an amino acid in our comparison with polypeptides.

Figure 4

Table 2. Calculated stretching frequencies of 1, H2SO4, H3PO4, SO3, and SO2 alongside a selection of literature data

Supplementary material: File

Madan et al. supplementary material

Madan et al. supplementary material
Download Madan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 694.5 KB

Author comment: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR1

Comments

Prof. Bengt Nordén

Editor in Chief, QRB Discovery

Dear Prof. Nordén,

We are pleased to submit a manuscript by Ishaan Madan, Shekoufeh A. Aliabadi, Johanna Huhtasaari, Ebba Matic, Emil Hogedal, Kinga Kamińska, Filip Nilsson, Axel Stark, Fernando Izquierdo-Ruiz, Hilda Sandström, and Martin Rahm entitled On the Possibility of Carbon-Free Biopolymers on Venus: A Computational Astrobiology Study for your consideration for publication QRB Discovery.

Our manuscript explores the plausibility of non-carbon biopolymers forming and persisting in Venus’s sulfuric acid clouds. These clouds, at an altitude of about 60 km, exhibit strikingly Earth-like temperatures and pressures. Such features – along with the debated detection of phosphine, a po-tential biosignature (Greaves et al., Nat. Astron. 5, 2021) – have made Venus a highly prioritized target of exploration, with many missions planned in the coming decade.

We frame our analysis around a favorable comparison between the envisioned sulfur- and phos-phorus-based polymers and the polypeptide backbone of conventional biology, whose abiotic formation on Earth remains unresolved, in part due to the unfavorable thermodynamics of amino acid polymerization in water. However, the goal of this study is not to advocate for a specific molecular structure or biological function of the proposed biopolymers. Rather, the chemistry presented here serves as an example of applied computational astrobiology, illustrating a framework for evaluating the baseline feasibility of unconventional chemistries under extreme planetary con-ditions.

Using quantum chemistry, we evaluate thermodynamic viability, basic kinetic stability, and diagnostic spectral fingerprints of hypothetical sulfur- and phosphorus-based polymers in the Venusian cloud decks. Our study exemplifies how established computational tools can be used to interrogate unconventional macromolecular architectures in environments far removed from Earth. We believe this work is valuable because in that it offers a practical, transferable workflow for screening speculative molecules, before committing to resource-intensive experiments or more in-depth modeling.

By exploring the plausibility rather than asserting presence, our work contributes to a broader reframing of life detection strategies for future space exploration: not as a search for Earth-like biology, but as an open inquiry into what life could look like under radically different chemical and physical constraints. Our case study illustrates how the scientific method can anchor speculative curiosity into structured, even testable exploration, which we hope will stimulate cross disciplinary engagement.

We believe this manuscript can offer QRB Discovery readers a forward-looking example of how astrobiology can embrace unorthodox hypotheses without compromising rigor – expanding both our chemical imagination, and readiness to recognize life beyond Earth. We submit to your journal because the study probes the limits of biophysics and should be of interested to a broad scientific audience, including researchers interested in the origin(s) of life, astrochemistry, and planetary science.

Sincerely,

Martin Rahm, on behalf of all co-authors.

Review: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests

Comments

Review of “On the Possibility of Carbon-Free Biopolymers on Venus: A Computational Astrobiology Study”

It is speculated that the atmosphere of Venus might contain polymeric sulfur and phosphorus-based oxides which act as biopolymers. This speculation about the existence of such compounds is carefully supported by computations pointing to the existence of such compounds. I favor publication of this study, but I am not at ease with the choice of title. The authors favor the title “On the Possibility of Carbon-Free Biopolymers on Venus: A Computational Astrobiology Study.” I think what this study shows is the possibility of polypeptide analogs, but it is not clear what, if any, biological activity they might have. Therefore, I am reluctant that these compounds be referred to as biopolymers. I suggest that biopolymers not be in the title of the paper by itself but rather something like possible analogs of biopolymers.

Review: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The paper presents an analysis and discussion of the possibility of development of life on Venous. The issues explored are very intriguing and interesting and should be of interest to the readers . However, the background and the methods used for the actual calculations may not be up to the current state of the art treatments.

My concerns include the argument that the current estimates do not reflect free energies since the chamges in entropic contributions of bond rotations are not expected to be large. However, the main issue is the entropic contributions of the sourounding solvent, In fact, proper calculations should have involved QM/MM free energy calculations that include the assumed polar environments ( e.g. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117 (42), 12807–12819. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4020146

I realize that such calculations are challenging but the readers must be exposed to the possible problems with the current estimates.

Review: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR4

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Madan et al. carried out quantum chemical calculations to assess thermodynamic parameters for the formation and decomposition of cyclic heteropolymers consisting of phosphoric-sulfonic diester subunits under conditions similar to those of the atmospheric cloud decks of Venus. Venusian clouds at high altitude consist of sulfuric acids aerosols with low water content at moderate temperature and pressure. The authors’ modeling suggests that such polymers could form and persist, and thus potentially provide the basis for informational heteropolymers that are thought to be essential for life. They also suggest what distinct wavelengths might be observed in the “signature region” of the infrared spectrum to indicate that such compounds indeed exist in Venusian clouds, should a suitable detection system become available. This is a jaunty manuscript that would be suitable for publication in QRB Discovery, subject to the minor revisions described below.

1. It is not appropriate to refer to the polyphosphoric-sulfonic compounds as “biopolymers”. The central point of this study is that these polymers could plausibly form spontaneously under abiotic conditions similar to those of the atmospheric cloud decks of Venus. Thus, these polymers cannot be regarded as potential biosignatures, but rather agnostic signatures that may reflect either abiotic or biotic processes (for extensive discussion, see An Astrobiology Strategy for the Search for Life in the Universe, National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2019, Ch. 4). A better term would be “heteropolymer”.

2. Although there are some superficial structural similarities between the polyphosphoric-sulfonic compounds and polypeptides, as shown in Figure 1, there are important differences that likely will make the former much less amenable to exhibiting function. There are eight rotatable bonds within each phosphoric-sulfonic subunit of the hypothetical heteropolymer compared to only three rotatable bonds within each amino acid subunit of a polypeptide. The side chains of the hypothetical heteropolymer are more likely to disrupt the backbone structure and perturb polymerization efficiency compared to the side chains of polypeptides. A comparison to teichoic acids might be more apt. In any case, the authors need to tone down the comparative reference to polypeptides.

3. The authors’ discussion of the “phosphate problem” neglects to reference the recent work of Catling and colleagues showing that phosphate can accumulate to high levels within carbonate-rich lakes (see Toner & Catling, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 117, 883–888, 2020).

4. The term “firebrand” (line 178) has the connotation of “agitator”, which is not likely what the authors intended. A better word would be “advocate”.

5. The decision to model cyclic as opposed to linear heteropolymers is understandable as a practical matter, but the authors need to acknowledge the effect this decision may have on their results. Dimer formation may be hindered due to the need to close the macrocycle, whereas subsequent addition reactions may benefit from relieving ring strain. This is another way in which the thermodynamic profile does not “resemble that of terrestrial peptide synthesis” (line 261), which is a linear process. There is an extensive literature on cyclic peptide synthesis, both non-enzymatic and through non-ribosomal peptide synthesis, with the former making use of activating groups and the latter catalyzed by biological enzymes.

6. The authors need to discuss plausible steady-state concentrations for the monomeric building blocks in Venusian clouds. Of course this would be speculative, but it would be beneficial to consider what concentrations would be needed to achieve productive kinetic rates for polymer synthesis.

7. The authors need to consider phosphoester and sulfoester transesterification that would result in disproportionation reactions that both increase and decrease polymer chain length. These reactions likely would occur at a much faster rate than polymer decomposition.

8. It is difficult to understand why such a simple study requires 11 co-authors. The senior author should provide a statement regarding the contributions of each author and consider whether some of the current authors should instead be acknowledged rather than given co-authorship.

Review: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR5

Conflict of interest statement

no conflicts

Comments

I really enjoyed reading the paper. the paper might be a step forward to answer a fascinating question: can life exist without water?

The authors explore the possibility of life in acidic cloud decks of Venus’ atmosphere. They explore carbon-free biopolymer that might be sourced from feedstock in the Venusian atmosphere.

The manuscript is well written and should be disseminated in the scientific literature.

I have a curiosity. To my knowledge Venus atmosphere is mainly composed of carbon dioxide (approximately 96.5%) and nitrogen (around 3.5%) plus some ppm of other gases, including sulfur based compounds,160 ppm. Can the chemical pathways described in the paper be active at so low sulfur derivatives concentrations?

Recommendation: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R0/PR7

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R1/PR8

Comments

Please see attached response letter.

Recommendation: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: On the possibility of carbon-free heteropolymers on Venus: a computational astrobiology study — R1/PR10

Comments

No accompanying comment.