Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mnl9s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T15:58:12.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Virtual reality meets ENT: a low-cost high-fidelity teaching course for peritonsillar abscess drainage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2025

Maisie McCormick Open the ORCID record for Maisie McCormick [Opens in a new window] ,
Lavandan Jegatheeswaran Open the ORCID record for Lavandan Jegatheeswaran [Opens in a new window] ,
Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam Open the ORCID record for Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam [Opens in a new window]  and
Dheeraj Karamchandani Open the ORCID record for Dheeraj Karamchandani [Opens in a new window]
Maisie McCormick
Affiliation:
Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Lavandan Jegatheeswaran*
Affiliation:
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK South Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trust, Warwick, UK
Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam
Affiliation:
Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
Dheeraj Karamchandani
Affiliation:
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
*
Corresponding author: Lavandan Jegatheeswaran; Email: lavandan.jegatheeswaran@nhs.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

This pilot randomised controlled trial evaluated virtual reality as a supplementary teaching tool for peritonsillar abscess drainage among third year medical students.

Methods

Twenty students were randomised to virtual reality-based or traditional teaching, each receiving a 90-minute session followed by an objective structured clinical examination and pre-/post-session knowledge tests. The virtual reality group used HTC Vive Focus 3 headsets with Virti, 3D Organon and EXR platforms.

Results

The virtual reality group scored higher in objective structured clinical examinations (26.9 vs. 21.5; p = 0.005) and reported greater procedural confidence (p = 0.008) and engagement (p = 0.003). Both groups improved knowledge (p < 0.001) without significant difference post-session (p = 0.701). Virtual reality was rated highly for effectiveness (9.6/10) and immersion (8.5/10) and had minimal cybersickness (1.8/10).

Conclusion

Virtual reality significantly enhances procedural confidence and performance. Its immersive format supports integration into surgical education, warranting further validation in larger studies.

Keywords

medical educationotolaryngologyperitonsillar abscesssimulation trainingvirtual reality

Information

Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , First View , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Lavandan Jegatheeswaran takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Peritonsillar abscess. In: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519520/ [18 December 2024]Google Scholar
Klug, TE, Rusan, M, Fuursted, K, Ovesen, T. Peritonsillar abscess: complication of acute tonsillitis or Weber’s Glands Infection? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;155:199–207Google Scholar
Klug, TE, Greve, T, Hentze, M. Complications of peritonsillar abscess. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2020;19:32Google Scholar
Jegatheeswaran, L, Naing, TKP, Choi, B, Collins, R, Luke, L, Gokani, S, et al. Simulation-based teaching: an effective modality for providing UK foundation doctors with core ENT skills training. J Laryngol Otol 2023;137:622–8Google Scholar
Fitzsimons, M, Williams, K, Knowles, S, Caroll, C. Peritonsillar abscess at a dedicated otolaryngology emergency department. Ir Med J 2021;114:489Google Scholar
Dimitrov, L, Unadkat, S, Khanna, A, Rennie, C, Saleh, H. ENT training amongst general practitioners: results from a questionnaire. J Laryngol Otol 2020;14:1–7Google Scholar
Khan, MM, Saeed, SR. Provision of undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching within General Medical Council approved UK medical schools: what is current practice? J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:340–4Google Scholar
Doshi, J, Carrie, S. A survey of undergraduate otolaryngology experience at Newcastle University Medical School. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:770–3Google Scholar
Ferguson, GR, Bacila, IA, Swamy, M. Does current provision of undergraduate education prepare UK medical students in ENT? A systematic literature review. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010054Google Scholar
Ijaz, A, Sundar, S, Zuberi, S, Richards, S. Online learning: an effective option for teaching ENT to medical students? J Laryngol Otol 2023;137:560–4Google Scholar
Chin, RY-K, Tjahjono, R, Rutledge, MJR, Lambert, T, Deboever, N. The evaluation of e-learning resources as an adjunct to otolaryngology teaching: a pilot study. BMC Med Educ 2019;19:181Google Scholar
Radianti, J, Majchrzak, TA, Fromm, J, Wohlgenannt, I. A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Comput Educ 2020;147:103778Google Scholar
Haowen, J, Vimalesvaran, S, Myint Kyaw, B, Tudor Car, L. Virtual reality in medical students’ education: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2021;11:e046986Google Scholar
Jensen, LX, Konradsen, F. A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Educ Inf Technol 2018;23:1515–29Google Scholar
Venail, F, Deveze, A, Lallemant, B, Guevara, N, Mondain, M. Enhancement of temporal bone anatomy learning with computer 3D rendered imaging software. Med Teach 2010;32:e282–8Google Scholar
Dharmawardana, N, Ruthenbeck, G, Woods, C, Elmiyeh, B, Diment, L, Ooi, EH, et al. Validation of virtual-reality-based simulations for endoscopic sinus surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 2015;40:569–79Google Scholar
Zhao, YC, Kennedy, G, Yukawa, K, Pyman, B, O’Leary, S. Improving temporal bone dissection using self-directed virtual reality simulation: results of a randomized blinded control trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;144:357–64Google Scholar
Copson, B, Wijewickrema, S, Zhou, Y, Piromchai, P, Briggs, R, Bailey, J, et al. Supporting skill acquisition in cochlear implant surgery through virtual reality simulation. Cochlear Implants Int 2017;18:89–96Google Scholar
Hardcastle, T, Wood, A. The utility of virtual reality surgical simulation in the undergraduate otorhinolaryngology curriculum. J Laryngol Otol 2018;132:1072–6Google Scholar
Course structure. In: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/study/ugr/why/courseinfo/structure/#y3 [20 December 2024]Google Scholar
Oh, H, Son, W. Cybersickness and Its severity arising from virtual reality content: a comprehensive study. Sensors (Basel) 2022;22:1314Google Scholar
McKinley, DW, Norcini, JJ. How to set standards on performance-based examinations: AMEE Guide No. 85. Med Teach 2014;36:97–110Google Scholar
Steensma, H, Groeneveld, K. Evaluating a training using the ‘four levels model.’ J Workplace Learning 2010;22:319–31Google Scholar
Marshall, DC, Salciccioli, JD, Walton, S-J, Pitkin, J, Shalhoub, J, Malietzis, G. Medical student experience in surgery influences their career choices: a systematic review of the literature. J Surg Educ 2015;72:438–45Google Scholar
Arora, A, Lau, LYM, Awad, Z, Darzi, A, Singh, A, Tolley, N. Virtual reality simulation training in otolaryngology. Int J Surg 2014;12:87–94Google Scholar
Farra, SL, Gneuhs, M, Hodgson, E, Kawosa, B, Miller, ET, Simon, A, et al. Comparative cost of virtual reality training and live exercises for training hospital workers for evacuation. Comput Inform Nurs 2019;37:446–54Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

McCormick et al. supplementary material

McCormick et al. supplementary material
Download McCormick et al. supplementary material(File)
File 890.9 KB