Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-6vlrh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-24T07:23:07.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence of Mollicutes in pregnant women undergoing high-risk prenatal care at a maternal and child reference unit in Bahia, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2025

Fabrícia Almeida Fernandes Santana
Affiliation:
Microbiology Department, https://ror.org/01zwq4y59State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Ilhéus, Brazil
Jéssica Bomfim
Affiliation:
Biointeraction Department, Multidisciplinary Institute of Health, https://ror.org/03k3p7647Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Vitória da Conquista, Brazil
Mariana Ferraz
Affiliation:
Biointeraction Department, Multidisciplinary Institute of Health, https://ror.org/03k3p7647Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Vitória da Conquista, Brazil
Victória Cardoso
Affiliation:
Biointeraction Department, Multidisciplinary Institute of Health, https://ror.org/03k3p7647Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Vitória da Conquista, Brazil
Jassy Borges
Affiliation:
Biointeraction Department, Multidisciplinary Institute of Health, https://ror.org/03k3p7647Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Vitória da Conquista, Brazil
Danielle Souto de Medeiros
Affiliation:
Biointeraction Department, Multidisciplinary Institute of Health, https://ror.org/03k3p7647Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Vitória da Conquista, Brazil
Maurício Grijó
Affiliation:
Biointeraction Department, Multidisciplinary Institute of Health, https://ror.org/03k3p7647Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Vitória da Conquista, Brazil
Guilherme B. Campos
Affiliation:
Biointeraction Department, Multidisciplinary Institute of Health, https://ror.org/03k3p7647Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Vitória da Conquista, Brazil
Lucas Miranda Marques*
Affiliation:
Microbiology Department, https://ror.org/01zwq4y59State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Ilhéus, Brazil Biointeraction Department, Multidisciplinary Institute of Health, https://ror.org/03k3p7647Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Vitória da Conquista, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: Lucas Miranda Marques; Email: lmirandamarques@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During pregnancy, colonization by genital mycoplasmas may be associated with adverse outcomes. This study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of four species of Mollicutes (Mycoplasma hominis, Mycoplasma genitalium, Ureaplasma parvum, and Ureaplasma urealyticum) in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care and to evaluate possible associated factors. Data collection included the application of a questionnaire and the collection of cervical swabs from pregnant women. Species identification was performed by real-time PCR. The overall prevalence of Mollicutes was 60.97%. 55.9% of pregnant women were colonized by Ureaplasma spp., and 19.51% by Mycoplasma spp. The prevalence rates by species were 48.78% for U. parvum, 11.59% for U. urealyticum, 18.9% for M. hominis, and 1.22% for M. genitalium. Age, 12 years of schooling or more, age at first sexual intercourse up to 14 years, third trimester of pregnancy, having undergone infertility treatment, presence of STI, and groin lymph nodes were associated with a higher prevalence of microorganisms. The results presented are of utmost importance for understanding the prevalence of these microorganisms, the characteristics of colonized pregnant women, and planning screening strategies and interventions that minimize the negative impacts of these infections.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Infections by Ureaplasma urealyticum, Ureaplasma parvum, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Mycoplasma hominis, species of the Mollicutes class and collectively referred to as genital mycoplasmas, have gained increasing attention due to their impacts on women’s health. These microorganisms commonly colonize the urogenital tract, often without symptoms, but are associated with several clinical conditions such as urethritis, cervicitis, and pelvic inflammatory disease [Reference Stavart, Baud and Eyer1]. During pregnancy, colonization by mycoplasmas may be related to adverse outcomes, including spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, and low birth weight [Reference Murtha and Edwards2]. Furthermore, vertical transmission of mycoplasmas during childbirth can cause neonatal infections, increasing neonatal morbidity and mortality [Reference Stol3].

The appropriate diagnosis and treatment of genital mycoplasma infections are challenging due to the insidious nature of these bacteria and their resistance to common antibiotics [Reference Redelinghuys4]. The most sensitive detection of these pathogens involves molecular biology techniques, which are not always available in resource-limited healthcare settings. In addition, the individual pathogenic potential of genital mycoplasma species, their synergy with other microorganisms, their interaction with the host immune system, and the effects that microbial load has on the change from mere colonization to infection with clinical repercussions are still unclear [Reference Donders5].

This study aims to contribute to the epidemiological knowledge of these infections, offering data that can guide prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Although studies are showing the prevalence and adverse effects of genital mycoplasma infection in pregnant women, the data are still insufficient to clarify all aspects of this interaction, and it is crucial to investigate the prevalence of Mollicutes in pregnant women, evaluate the associated risk factors and the clinical implications of these infections [Reference Jonduo6]. Thus, the objective of the study was to investigate the presence of four species of Mollicutes (M. hominis, M. genitalium, U. parvum, and U. urealyticum) in the cervical region of pregnant women attended for high-risk prenatal care at a maternal and child referral unit in southwestern Bahia, Brazil, and to evaluate possible associated factors.

Methods

Study design

This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the prevalence of genital mycoplasma colonization in pregnant women. Researchers from the Federal University of Bahia and the State University of Santa Cruz collected data and biological material from pregnant women attending high-risk prenatal care at a maternal and child health unit in Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.

Population

Pregnant women aged 18 years or older, at any gestational age, and meeting the criteria for high-risk prenatal care by the Technical Manual for High-Risk Pregnancy of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (Brazil, 2022), such as obesity, repeated spontaneous abortion, preterm birth in a previous pregnancy, hypertension or diabetes before pregnancy, infectious diseases during pregnancy and uterine malformations, took part in the study. Pregnant women who used antibiotics to treat infection in the last 14 days before collection were excluded. The sample consisted of 164 pregnant women treated between November 2021 and November 2022.

Ethical procedures

This research complied with the provisions of Resolutions 466/12 and 510/2016 of the National Health Council, which regulate research involving human beings. It was carried out only after approval by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Multidisciplinary Institute of Health of the Federal University of Bahia – IMS/UFBA, under CAAE: 40117020.4.0000.5556. The researchers approached the participants empathetically, and the objectives of the study and the details regarding data collection and biological materials that would be collected were presented through the reading of the Free and Informed Consent Form (FICF); after consent, this was then signed by the participant, who kept a copy.

Data and sample collection

Data collection consisted of applying a semi-structured questionnaire to identify the patient’s epidemiological profile, which was divided into modules and adapted from the study by Campos et al. [Reference Campos7]. In addition, a cervical sample was collected by the gynecologists/obstetricians participating in the research and included in the routine of the health service. The order of collection of the cervical sample and questionnaire was conducted not to hinder the flow of clinical care in the health service. The cervical material was collected with a sterile cotton swab in the doctor’s office, with the aid of a speculum, packaged in a Stuart transport medium, and transported in isothermal boxes to the Microbiology and Immunology laboratory of the Multidisciplinary Institute of Health, Federal University of Bahia. Upon arrival at the laboratory, the swabs were packaged in 15 ml Falcon tubes, incorrectly identified as containing 5 ml of PBS. The samples were then homogenized, aliquoted into 1.5 ml microtubes, and stored at −20 °C until processing.

DNA extraction and identification by qPCR

For microbial identification of cervical samples, genomic DNA was initially extracted using the standardized boiling and PBS method [Reference Bashiruddin8]. DNA aliquots were then subjected to quantification and quality analysis by spectrophotometry in a NanoDrop (Thermo ScientificTM 5 NanoDrop 2000) at OD 260/280, also observing whether there was the presence of contaminants, such as lipids and proteins. Then, a real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed in StepOne Plus (Life Technologies) with a final volume of 25 μl and Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). To identify the microbial species, TaqMan probes were used, following a basic amplification protocol for the species U. urealyticum [Reference Cao9], U. parvum [Reference Cao9], M. hominis [Reference Férandon10], and M. genitalium [Reference Olsen11]. Positive control (DNA extracted from the culture of microorganisms isolated and characterized in previous studies by the same research group and kept at −70 °C in PBS medium), negative control (no DNA), and samples were included.

Statistical analysis

Initially, descriptive analysis of all variables was performed using absolute and relative frequencies (%). The prevalence of all outcomes was estimated, along with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). A bivariate analysis of the explanatory variables and outcomes was performed. Differences between categorical variables and the occurrence of each outcome were tested using Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. In all tests, p < 0.05 was considered significant. The prevalence ratio (PR) and its respective 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using Poisson regression with robust variance.

Multivariate analysis was performed for the following outcomes: presence of Mollicutes, presence of Ureaplasma spp., presence of Mycoplasma spp., presence of U. urealyticum, presence of U. parvum, and presence of M. hominis. For this stage, the variables that obtained a p-value <0.20 in the bivariate analysis were selected. The multivariate models were analyzed using the backward stepwise method for variable selection and compared using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The adequacy of the final model was assessed using the chi-squared test (goodness-of-fit). Only variables with a p-value <0.05 remained in the final statistical model. The statistical software STATA version 16.1 (Stata Corporation, College Station, USA) was used for all analyses.

Results

There was variation in the sample size, as collecting information from the questionnaire for five pregnant women was impossible. For this reason, the data presented in Table 1 refer to the sample number of 159 pregnant women who collected swabs and questionnaires. Most study participants were between 20 and 34 years old, had a partner at the time of the study, were from urban areas, reported being non-black, had 12 or more years of education, and had an income of less than one minimum wage. Most were in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, did not practice physical activity (aerobic exercise or weight training at least three times a week), and did not drink alcohol. Regarding gynecological and obstetric history, most reported not having had fibroids, polycystic ovaries, or other gynecological alterations, had not had an ectopic pregnancy, and had not undergone infertility treatment. Regarding STI history (HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B and C, HPV, genital herpes, gonorrhea, chlamydia and trichomoniasis), most reported not having had an STI in the past, had not undergone treatment for STI, and current STI tests (performed at the health service and which did not include mycoplasmas for either the pregnant woman or the partner) were negative. Most had their first sexual intercourse after the age of 15, had more than one sexual partner during their lifetime, reported pain during sexual intercourse, reported bleeding during sexual intercourse, and did not use condoms or used them inconsistently. More than half had undergone a gynecological examination within 1 year before the survey and used contraceptives. Regarding obstetric history, the number of pregnancies was relatively homogeneous: 1, 2, or 3 or more. Most had no miscarriages, preterm births, or stillbirths. Regarding the number of expected prenatal consultations, most had six or more consultations and had not used antibiotics in the last 3 months. Most pregnant women had one or two or more symptoms at some point during pregnancy. More than half of the pregnant women had vaginal discharge as a symptom. Regarding information about their partners, most had not undergone treatment for infertility or STIs.

Table 1. Characteristics of pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwestern Bahia (n = 159). Brazil, 2021–2022

a n = absolute frequency.

b IC95%: confidence interval 95%.

c STI = Sexually transmitted infection.

The overall prevalence of Mollicutes was 60.97% (n = 100). 55.9% (n = 91) of the pregnant women were colonized by Ureaplasma spp., and 19.51% (n = 32) were colonized by Mycoplasma spp. The prevalences by species were: 48.78% (n = 80) U. parvum, 11.59% (n = 19) U. urealyticum, 18.9% (n = 31) M. hominis, and 1.22% (n = 2) M. genitalium (Table 2). Coinfection between Mollicutes species occurred in 17.07% (n = 28), and isolated infection occurred in 43.9% (n = 72) of the participants (Table 2). Figure 1 shows the detection percentage for isolated infection and coinfection among positive cases.

Table 2. Prevalence of Mollicutes colonization in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwestern Bahia (n = 164). Brazil, 2021–2022

a n = absolute frequency.

b CI95%: confidence interval 95%.

Figure 1. Coinfection between Mollicutes species in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwesternBahia (n = 100). Brazil, 2021-2022.

Table 3 presents the results that showed statistical significance in the bivariate analysis for the prevalence of Mollicutes, Mycoplasma spp., and Ureaplasma spp. Table 4 shows the statistical significance of the bivariate analysis for Ureaplasma spp., U. parvum, and U. urealyticum. Table 5 presents the statistical significance data from the bivariate analysis for Mycoplasma spp., M. genitalium, and M. hominis. The complete data from the bivariate analysis can be found in Supplementary Tables S1S2, and S3, which are included in the Supplementary Materials.

Table 3. Bivariate analysis for the prevalence of Mollicutes, Mycoplasma spp. and Ureaplasma spp. in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwestern Bahia (n = 164). Brazil, 2021–2022

a n = Absolute frequency.

b P = Prevalence.

c PR = Crude prevalence ratio.

d CI95%: Confidence interval 95%.

e Fisher’s exact test.

** Statistical analysis was not possible.

Statistically significant values are highlighted in bold.

Table 4. Bivariate analysis for the prevalence of Ureaplasma spp., Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwestern Bahia (n = 164). Brazil, 2021–2022

a n = Absolute frequency.

b P = Prevalence.

c PR = Crude prevalence ratio.

d CI95%: Confidence interval 95%.

e Fisher’s exact test; **Statistical analysis was not possible.

Statistically significant values are highlighted in bold.

Table 5. Bivariate analysis for the prevalence of Mycoplasma spp., Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma hominis in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwestern Bahia (n = 164). Brazil, 2021–2022

a n = Absolute frequency

b P = Prevalence.

c PR = Crude prevalence ratio.

d CI95%: Confidence interval 95%.

e Fisher’s exact test.

** Statistical analysis was not possible.

Statistically significant values are highlighted in bold.

After multivariate analysis, the following factors were associated with a higher prevalence of Mollicutes: 12 or more years of schooling (PR = 1.36, CI95% = 1.04–1.78), age at first sexual intercourse up to 14 years (PR = 1.41, CI95% = 1.07–1.84), and infertility treatment (PR = 0.32, CI95% = 0.14–0.75). For Ureaplasma spp.: age at first sexual intercourse up to 14 years (PR = 1.37, CI95% = 1.03–1.81) and infertility treatment (PR = 0.27, CI95% = 0.09–0.76). For Mycoplasma spp., being between 20 and 34 years of age (PR = 2.61, CI95% = 1.10–6.20). For U. urealyticum: being in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy (PR = 0.24, CI95% = 0.08–0.77), having had STIs (PR = 2.58, CI95% = 1.09–6.12), and having groin lymph nodes (PR = 3.07, CI95% = 1.04–9.04). For U. parvum: 12 years of schooling or more (PR = 1.60, CI95% = 1.11–2.30), age at first sexual intercourse up to 14 years (PR = 1.60, CI95% = 1.13–2.26), and infertility treatment (PR = 0.30, CI95% = 0.11–0.82). For M. hominis: age between 20 and 34 years (PR = 2.57, CI95% = 1.08–6.11). These data are presented in Table 6.

Table 6. Multivariate analysis for the prevalence of Mollicutes, Mycoplasma spp., Ureaplasma spp., Ureaplasma urealyticum, Ureaplasma parvum and Mycoplasma hominis in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwestern Bahia (n = 164). Brazil, 2021–2022

a PR = Adjusted prevalence ratio.

b CI95%: Confidence interval 95%.

Discussion

The prevalence of genital mycoplasmas in pregnant women has been reported in studies conducted in other countries and, to a lesser extent, in Brazil [Reference Abdelaziz12Reference Teixeira Oliveira19]. Some of these studies have attempted to associate risk factors for infection with adverse outcomes during pregnancy. However, it is still unclear whether all species are directly involved in the infection, whether the bacterial load is decisive, whether the crucial point is the interaction with other microorganisms, or whether it depends on the host response [Reference Jonduo6]. In Brazil, Mollicutes infections are not part of the standard STI screening protocol for pregnant women, and, in the absence of rapid diagnostic tests and difficulty in accessing molecular tests, syndromic treatment has been the practice. This was the first study to assess the prevalence of Mollicutes in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in the interior of Bahia.

The overall prevalence of Mollicutes found in our study (60.97%) was higher than the 9.3% reported in the survey by Peretz et al. [Reference Peretz16] carried out with 214 pregnant women in Israel, in which vaginal swab samples and detection by culture and PCR were used. The use of vaginal swab in the study above may explain the differences mentioned, since a higher rate of colonization by Mollicutes in the cervical region is expected, as occurred in our study. The prevalence was also higher than that observed in the study by Lee et al. [Reference Lee13], who detected 571 cases of MH and UU among 1035 participants in South Korea. However, this study used culture as the detection method, and molecular detection, compared to culture, is expected to provide a higher detection rate due to the higher sensitivity of the technique. By species, we detected a higher prevalence of U. parvum, which is in agreement with the study by Payne et al. [Reference Payne15] carried out in Australia, which found a higher prevalence of U. parvum (between 35% and 63%) at three different times during pregnancy. This higher prevalence of U. parvum was not observed in studies such as that of Abdelaziz et al. [Reference Abdelaziz12], which showed a higher prevalence of M. hominis, and that of Lee et al. [Reference Lee13], which found a higher prevalence of U. urealyticum.

The present study also identified a high co-infection by at least two species, emphasizing co-infection between M. hominis and U. urealyticum. A retrospective cohort study carried out by Jeon et al. [Reference Jeon20] in South Korea included 1381 pregnant women admitted to a high-risk unit and demonstrated that the group with genital colonization by mycoplasmas had a higher risk of premature rupture of membranes and chorioamnionitis compared to the group without colonization (42.4% vs. 35.6%, p = 0.013). In an extensive multicenter study with 3643 participants in Austria, Rittenschober-Böhm et al. [Reference Rittenschober-Böhm21] investigated U. parvum serovars in the vaginal region and their relationship with spontaneous preterm birth. In this study, in the samples positive for UP (37%, n = 1347), serovar 3 was the most common isolate, and there was a significantly increased risk of preterm birth at low (<32 weeks) and extremely low (<28 weeks) gestational age. The high prevalence of genital mycoplasmas in pregnant women deserves attention since several studies have shown an association of these microorganisms with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Still, about premature birth, the study by Vouga et al. [Reference Vouga22] in Switzerland evaluated colonization by mycoplasmas and subsequent treatment in 5.377 pregnant women. 2.259 women (42%) had a positive culture for Ureaplasma spp. or M. hominis, representing significant colonization (percentage of positive cultures), even using a less sensitive method. Women colonized by genital mycoplasmas and treated demonstrated lower premature birth rates (Ureaplasma spp., p 0.024; M. hominis, p 0.001). Some studies have shown that genital mycoplasma infection may play an essential role in the etiology of spontaneous abortion [18, 19, 23–25, 26], premature rupture of membranes [27–29], chorioamnionitis [30–32], intra-amniotic infection [33–35] and other obstetric complications [36–38].

The prevalence of Mollicutes, Ureaplasma spp., and U. parvum in the present study was associated with pregnant women who had their first sexual intercourse at up to 14 years of age. Although we did not find studies in the literature that associated this same risk factor for infection with the Mollicutes class in pregnant women, the study by Lee et al. [Reference Lee13] found a high prevalence (88.2%) of Mollicutes in pregnant women aged between 15 and 19 years, which may be a reflection of the early onset of sexual activity, drawing attention to the need for more excellent care with pregnant adolescents. Studies indicate a strong association between the early onset of sexual activity and STIs [Reference Ma39], which implies increased costs for the management of these infections in health services.

Our study observed an association between infertility treatment and the prevalence of Mollicutes, Ureaplasma spp., and U. parvum. Regarding infertility, many studies show that genital mycoplasmas influence male and female fertility. The inflammatory processes triggered by these pathogens can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease, deterioration of spermatogenesis, obstruction of the seminal tract, agglutination of motile sperm, induction of apoptosis, production of immobilization factors, and impairment of the acrosome region [40–42] and some mycoplasma strains resistant to macrolide treatment have already been reported [Reference Nazarzadeh43]. By correlating this information with the results obtained in our study, it is possible to assume that having undergone treatment implies that, at some point before pregnancy, there was an investigation for infertility, with one of the potential causes being Mycoplasma infection. Once the treatment was performed, the infection was resolved. The woman was able to become pregnant. However, mycoplasma infection is only one of the possible causes of infertility, and we did not have information on the reason for the women who underwent treatment.

There are also conflicting studies in the literature, such as that by Günyeli et al. [Reference Günyeli44], which indicate no differences between fertile and infertile couples regarding Mycoplasma infection. Even so, the association between infertility treatment and Mollicutes infection should be monitored in more depth since professionals working in reproductive medicine are aware of the high rate of couples with difficulty getting pregnant due to infection by some microorganisms, including mycoplasmas. In cases such as couples with infertility or pregnant women with complications in previous pregnancies in which Mollicutes were isolated, screening and treatment protocols for these infections could be implemented, reducing the negative impacts on health and costs. Although some studies have not found evidence to screen and treat colonized patients without complications, there is still a need for more studies with specific patient groups, such as pregnant women.

Regarding the association between Mollicutes and women having previously had STIs, there are studies in the literature that reveal that mycoplasmas are more frequent in HIV-infected patients, as shown in the systematic review by Boujemaa, Singh-Suri, and Kaur [Reference Boujemaa, Singh-Suri and Kaur45]. In our study, HIV infection was not reported in any of the participants. The study by Koch et al. [Reference Koch46] showed that in both men and women, infection by Trichomonas vaginalis increases colonization by M. hominis and U. urelyticum. A high prevalence of co-infection by HPV and U. parvum [Reference Disi47] and U. urealyticum [Reference Kim48] was also observed. Infection by M. genitalium is considered an emerging STI with controversial management [Reference Begnis49]. In recent decades, there has been a growing association between Mycoplasma infections and other STIs; however, epidemiological surveillance data provided by the Brazilian Ministry of Health [50] are limited to HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, and syphilis. Estimating the prevalence of these infections worldwide is necessary to clarify diagnostic gaps, design control programs, and allocate health resources.

In pregnant women, data on STIs and mycoplasmas are even more limited, which is a concern since these infections, when undetected and untreated during pregnancy, are associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The pregnancy condition is known to be immunotolerant, which may contribute to susceptibility to pathogens. In addition, pregnant women report lower rates of condom use, although less sexual activity and less risky sexual behaviors may offset this risk [Reference Waltmann, McKinnish and Duncan51]. Although there are reports of M. hominis and herpes simplex infection in pregnant women [Reference Sonpar52] and some studies, such as that by Stafford et al. [Reference Stafford53], show the association of M. genitalium with Chlamydia trachomatis, the existing data are not yet sufficient to demonstrate the cause-and-effect relationship in these associations, especially regarding other species of genital mycoplasmas. In our study, we observed that pregnant women who had some STIs had a higher risk of infection by U. urealyticum. This finding opens the possibility for further research to try to determine which specific STIs are associated with infection by U. urealyticum and other genital mycoplasmas.

Our study found a positive association between having 12 or more years of education and infection by Mollicutes and U. parvum. This finding differs from that found in the study by Jeon et al. [Reference Jeon20], which showed that a lower level of education tends to be associated with genital colonization by mycoplasmas in high-risk pregnant women. For the gestational age variable, we observed in our research that pregnant women in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy had a lower chance of infection by U. urealyticum, which contrasts with the finding of the work by Abdelaziz et al. [Reference Abdelaziz12] in which of the 200 pregnant women, 176 (88%) presented positivity for some bacteria in the vaginal region, most of them in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy (71.6%) and also contrasts with the study by Payne et al. [Reference Payne15] which demonstrated that the prevalence of UU and UP were similar in the three moments of pregnancy (1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters), allowing us to understand that the colonization status is preserved during pregnancy. In the present study, we also observed that the presence of groin lymph nodes is positively associated with infection by U. urealyticum. However, we did not find other studies demonstrating this association for comparison purposes.

The results we present on the detection of Mollicutes in pregnant women have important implications for helping to understand the prevalence profile of these microorganisms in this population group. Since it has been demonstrated that mycoplasma infection has negative impacts on maternal and neonatal health, studies such as this provide data for the health system that help in the development of health policies aimed at screening and treating these infections, reducing health costs with the management of complications resulting from these infections. The high prevalence found in our study, associated with data from other studies, leads us to believe that if there were screening for genital mycoplasmas during prenatal care and subsequent treatment, adverse pregnancy outcomes would probably be reduced. Further research will be needed to confirm the prevalence and causal relationship and identify risk factors for Mollicutes infections in pregnant women. Studies must be well controlled and with different groups, which demonstrate the bacterial load, vaginal pH, quantity of Lactobacillus, elevation of cytokines, and clinical conditions of pregnant women. It is worth noting that many studies in the literature did not present consistent data and used methods that were not very sensitive for detecting microorganisms. Although we had limitations in our study, we associated important epidemiological variables and used the gold standard method for detecting mycoplasmas.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268825100137.

Data availability statement

Raw data for this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the women who participated in this study.

Author contribution

Conceptualization: D.S.d.M., F.A.F.S., G.B.C., J.B., L.M.M.; Investigation: J.B., M.F., M.G., V.C.

Funding statement

This study was supported by the State of Bahia Research Foundation (FAPESB/PPSUS SUS0044/2018) and financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Brasil (CAPES) – Finance code 001.

Competing interests

The authors declare none.

References

Stavart, L, Baud, D and Eyer, M (2023) Ureaplasma urealyticum, Ureaplasma parvum et Mycoplasma hominis: Commensaux ou pathogènes? [Ureaplasma urealyticum, Ureaplasma parvum, and Mycoplasma hominis: commensals or pathogens?]. Revue Médicale Suisse. 19, 18351839. French. https://doi.org/10.53738/REVMED.2023.19.845.1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murtha, AP and Edwards, JM (2014) The role of Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 41, 615627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2014.08.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stol, K, et al. (2021) Perinatal infections with Ureaplasma. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 40, S26S30. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000002859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redelinghuys, MJ, et al. (2014) Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Ureaplasma species and Mycoplasma hominis in pregnant women. BMC Infectious Disease 14, 171. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donders, GGG, et al. (2017) Mycoplasma/Ureaplasma infection in pregnancy: To screen or not to screen. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 45, 505515. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonduo, ME, et al. (2022 ) Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 12, e062990. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062990. Erratum in: BMJ Open 2023;13(9):e062990corr1. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062990corr1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campos, GB, et al. ((2015 )) Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma hominis in the urogenital tract of Brazilian women. BMC Infectious Disease 15, 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0792-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bashiruddin, JB (1998) Extraction of DNA from mycoplasmas. Methods in Molecular Biology 104, 141144. https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-525-15:141.Google ScholarPubMed
Cao, X, et al. (2007) Real-time TaqMan polymerase chain reaction assays for quantitative detection and differentiation of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 57, 373378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.09.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Férandon, C, et al. (2011) Development of a real-time PCR targeting the yidC gene for the detection of Mycoplasma hominis and comparison with quantitative culture. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 17, 155159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03217.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsen, B, et al. (2009) Population-based assessment of Mycoplasma genitalium in Vietnam-low prevalence among married women of reproductive age in a rural area. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 23, 533537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03117.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdelaziz, ZA, et al. (2014) Vaginal infections among pregnant women at Omdurman maternity Hospital in Khartoum, Sudan. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 8, 490497. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.3197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, MY, et al. (2016) Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in pregnant women. Yonsei Medical Journal 57, 12711275. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agger, WA, et al. (2014) Epidemiologic factors and urogenital infections associated with preterm birth in a midwestern U.S. population. Obstetrics Gynecology 124, 969977. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, MS, et al. (2016) Ureaplasma parvum genotype, combined vaginal colonisation with Candida albicans, and spontaneous preterm birth in an Australian cohort of pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 16, 312. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1110-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretz, A, et al. (2020) Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma carriage in pregnant women: The prevalence of transmission from mother to newborn. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 20, 456. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03147-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toboso Silgo, L, et al. (2021) Screening for vaginal and endocervical infections in the first trimester of pregnancy? A study that ignites an old debate. Pathogens 10, 1610. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10121610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, CNT, et al. (2020) Association of spontaneous abortion and Ureaplasma parvum detected in placental tissue. Epidemiology & Infection 148, 126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820001302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teixeira Oliveira, CN, et al. (2021) Ureaplasma parvum alters the immune tolerogenic state in placental tissue and could cause miscarriage. Fertility and Sterility 116, 10301039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeon, J, et al. (2022) Maternal baseline risk factors for abnormal vaginal colonisation among high-risk pregnant women and the association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rittenschober-Böhm, J, et al. (2019) Vaginal Ureaplasma parvum serovars and spontaneous preterm birth. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 220, 594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vouga, M, et al. (2014) Treatment of genital mycoplasma in colonized pregnant women in late pregnancy is associated with a lower rate of premature labour and neonatal complications. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 20, 10741079. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, CJ, et al. (2018) Relation between mycoplasma infection and recurrent spontaneous abortion. European Review for Medical Pharmacological Sciences 22, 22072211. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201804_14805.Google ScholarPubMed
Contini, C, et al. (2018) Investigation on silent bacterial infections in specimens from pregnant women affected by spontaneous miscarriage. Journal of Cellular Physiology 234, 100107. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.26952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smaoui, M, et al. (2019) Human miscarriage and infection in Tunisia: Role of Mycoplasma hominis and high Waddlia seroprevalence. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 13, 410418. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.9829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, J, et al. (2022) Is there an association between recurrent spontaneous abortion and mycoplasma infection? The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 16, 13021307. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.15134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kacerovsky, M, et al. (2022) Prevalence and load of cervical Ureaplasma species with respect to intra-amniotic complications in women with preterm Prelabor rupture of membranes before 34 weeks. Frontiers in Pharmacology 13, 860498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.860498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romero, R, et al. (2015) Sterile and microbial-associated intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 28, 13941409. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2014.958463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Trujillo, A, et al. (2016) Gestational age is more important for short-term neonatal outcomes than the microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity or intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. Acta Obstetetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 95(8), 926933. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikhney, J, et al. (2017) Is Ureaplasma spp. the leading causative agent of acute chorioamnionitis in women with preterm birth? Clinical Microbiology and Infection 23, 119.e1119.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.10.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romero, R, et al. (2015) Clinical chorioamnionitis at term I: Microbiology of the amniotic cavity using cultivation and molecular techniques. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 43, 1936. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2014-0249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, RG, et al. (2020) Detection of microbial cell-free DNA in maternal and umbilical cord plasma in patients with chorioamnionitis using next-generation sequencing. PLoS One 15, e0231239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusanovic, JP, et al. (2022) Characterization of amniotic fluid sludge in preterm and term gestations. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 35, 97709779. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2022.2053102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romero, R, et al. (2014) Bacteria and endotoxin in meconium-stained amniotic fluid at term: Could intra-amniotic infection cause meconium passage? The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 27, 775788. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.844124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowlands, S, et al. (2017) Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in midtrimester pregnancies using molecular microbiology. American Journal of Obstetetrics and Gynecology 217, 71.e171.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aydogan, P, et al. (2014) Does cervical Ureaplasma/mycoplasma colonization increase the lower uterine segment bleeding risk during cesarean section among patients with placenta previa? A cross-sectional study. European Review for Medical Pharmacological Sciences 18, 22432247.Google ScholarPubMed
Bartkeviciene, D, et al. (2020) The impact of Ureaplasma infections on pregnancy complications. Libyan Journal of Medicine 15, 1812821. https://doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2020.1812821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, JE, et al. (2022) Composition and stability of the vaginal microbiota of pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 28, 905911. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izab314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, Q, et al. (2009) Early initiation of sexual activity: A risk factor for sexually transmitted diseases, HIV infection, and unwanted pregnancy among university students in China. BMC Public Health 9, 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, C, et al. (2023) Genital mycoplasma infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive Health 20, 136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01684-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tantengco, OAG, de Castro Silva, M and Velayo, CL (2021) The role of genital mycoplasma infection in female infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 85, e13390. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.13390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Y, Wu, X, Shen, B, Ma, H. (2024) The relationship between Ureaplasma species and male infertility: Pathogenicity, biology, diagnosis, and treatment. Alternaive Therapies in Health and Medicine 30(6), 96102.Google ScholarPubMed
Nazarzadeh, F, et al. (2022) Detection and evaluation of macrolide resistance (erythromycin) in Mycoplasma hominis isolated from Endocervical specimens of patients referring to Ibn Sina infertility treatment Centre, Tehran, Iran. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility 16, 95101. https://doi.org/10.22074/IJFS.2021.529020.1118.Google Scholar
Günyeli, I, et al. (2011) Chlamydia, Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infections in infertile couples and effects of these infections on fertility. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 283, 379385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1726-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boujemaa, S, Singh-Suri, G and Kaur, G (2023) Association between genital mycoplasmas (Ureaplasma urealyticum and mycoplasma hominis) and HIV infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Reviews 25, 7787. https://doi.org/10.24875/AIDSRev.22000024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, A, et al. (1997) Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in patients with sexually transmitted diseases. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 109, 584589.Google ScholarPubMed
Disi, A, et al. (2023) Status of common sexually transmitted infection in population referred for colposcopy and correlation with human papillomavirus infection. BMC Women’s Health 23, 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02693-6.Google Scholar
Kim, SI, et al. (2018) Co-infection of Ureaplasma urealyticum and human papilloma virus in asymptomatic sexually active individuals. International Journal of Medical Sciences 15, 915920. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.26523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Begnis, R, et al. (2021) Prevalence and risk factors of Mycoplasma genitalium infection in patients attending a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Reunion Island: A cross-sectional study (2017–2018). BMC Infectious Diseases 21, 482. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06193-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde (2022) Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas. In Manual de gestação de Alto Risco [recurso eletrônico]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, pp. 692: il.Google Scholar
Waltmann, A, McKinnish, TR and Duncan, JA (2021) Nonviral sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy: Current controversies and new challenges. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 34, 4049. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonpar, A, et al. (2018) Dual infection in pregnancy: Disseminated Mycoplasma hominis and necrotizing herpes simplex 2 hepatitis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 71, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2018.03.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stafford, IA, et al. (2021) Retrospective analysis of infection and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Mycoplasma genitalium among pregnant women in the southwestern USA. BMJ Open 11, e050475. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwestern Bahia (n = 159). Brazil, 2021–2022

Figure 1

Table 2. Prevalence of Mollicutes colonization in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwestern Bahia (n = 164). Brazil, 2021–2022

Figure 2

Figure 1. Coinfection between Mollicutes species in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwesternBahia (n = 100). Brazil, 2021-2022.

Figure 3

Table 3. Bivariate analysis for the prevalence of Mollicutes, Mycoplasma spp. and Ureaplasma spp. in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwestern Bahia (n = 164). Brazil, 2021–2022

Figure 4

Table 4. Bivariate analysis for the prevalence of Ureaplasma spp., Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwestern Bahia (n = 164). Brazil, 2021–2022

Figure 5

Table 5. Bivariate analysis for the prevalence of Mycoplasma spp., Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma hominis in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwestern Bahia (n = 164). Brazil, 2021–2022

Figure 6

Table 6. Multivariate analysis for the prevalence of Mollicutes, Mycoplasma spp., Ureaplasma spp., Ureaplasma urealyticum, Ureaplasma parvum and Mycoplasma hominis in pregnant women receiving high-risk prenatal care in southwestern Bahia (n = 164). Brazil, 2021–2022

Supplementary material: File

Santana et al. supplementary material

Santana et al. supplementary material
Download Santana et al. supplementary material(File)
File 129.3 KB