Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T22:12:04.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cochlear implantation in different stages of otosclerosis: difficulties and outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2025

Ossama Mustafa Mady ,
Lobna El Fiky ,
Badr Eldin Mostafa ,
Mina Fayez Saleeb  and
Ahmed Abdelmoneim Teaima Open the ORCID record for Ahmed Abdelmoneim Teaima [Opens in a new window]
Ossama Mustafa Mady
Affiliation:
Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Lobna El Fiky
Affiliation:
Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Badr Eldin Mostafa
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Mina Fayez Saleeb
Affiliation:
Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Ahmed Abdelmoneim Teaima*
Affiliation:
Otorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
*
Corresponding author : Ahmed Abdelmoneim Teaima; Email: a.teaima@med.asu.edu.eg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study is to evaluate the results obtained in a group of implanted otosclerotic patients and compare them with a matching group of non- otosclerosis cochlear implant patients.

Methods

Pre-operative computed tomographic scans, intra-operative findings, type of electrode used and difficulties of 17 patients with otosclerosis were documented. Post-operative complications, facial nerve stimulation, electrode dislocation and audiological and speech outcomes were documented and the data analysed.

Results

Surgical difficulties were directly related to the advanced stage of the disease. No major complications were reported in this cohort. No significant difference was found between both groups one year after surgery; the mean pure tone average was 35 dB ± 4.43, speech reception threshold was 40 ± 4.96 and speech discrimination score was 80 per cent ± 12.55 in the otosclerotic group.

Conclusion

Cochlear implantation is a safe and effective management for advanced otosclerosis patients even after stapes surgery.

Keywords

otosclerosiscochlear implantationcochlear implantstreatment outcome

Information

Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , First View , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Ahmed Abdelmoneim Teaima takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Marx, M, Lagleyre, S, Escudé, B, Demeslay, J, Elhadi, T, Deguine, O, et al. Correlations between CT scan findings and hearing thresholds in otosclerosis. Acta Otolaryngol 2011;131:351–7Google Scholar
Merkus, P, van Loon, MC, Smit, CF, Smits, C, de Cock, AFC, Hensen, EF. Decision making in advanced otosclerosis: an evidence-based strategy. Laryngoscope 2011;121:1935–41Google Scholar
Sainz, M, Garcia-Valdecasas, J, Ballesteros, JM. Complications and pitfalls of cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: a 6-year follow-up cohort study. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:1044–8Google Scholar
Rotteveel, LJC, Snik, AFM, Cooper, H, Mawman, DJ, van Olphen, AF, Mylanus, EAM. Speech perception after cochlear implantation in 53 patients with otosclerosis: multicentre results. Audiol Neurootol 2010;15:128–36Google Scholar
Maxwell, AK, Shokry, MH, Master, A, Slattery, WH 3rd. Sensitivity of high-resolution computed tomography in otosclerosis patients undergoing primary stapedotomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2020;129:918–23Google Scholar
Lee, J, JB, Nadol Jr, Eddington, DK. Factors associated with incomplete insertion of electrodes in cochlear implant surgery: a histopathologic study. Audiol Neurootol 2011;16:69–81Google Scholar
van Loon, MC, Merkus, P, Smit, CF, Smits, C, Witte, BI, Hensen, EF. Stapedotomy in cochlear implant candidates with far advanced otosclerosis: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:1707–14Google Scholar
Castillo, F, Polo, R, Gutiérrez, A, Reyes, P, Royuela, A, Alonso, A. Cochlear implantation outcomes in advanced otosclerosis. Am J Otolaryngol 2014;35:558–64Google Scholar
Seyyedi, M, Herrmann, BS, Eddington, DK, JB, Nadol Jr. The pathologic basis of facial nerve stimulation in otosclerosis and multi-channel cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34:1603–9Google Scholar
Dumas, AR, Schwalje, AT, Franco-Vidal, V, Bébéar, JP, Darrouzet, V, Bonnard, D. Cochlear implantation in far-advanced otosclerosis: hearing results and complications. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2018;38:445–52Google Scholar
Battmer, R, Pesch, J, Stöver, T, Lesinski-Schiedat, A, Lenarz, M, Lenarz, T. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:918–22Google Scholar
Kondo, M, Vasan, K, Jufas, NE, Patel, NP. Cochlear implantation in far advanced otosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2023;133:1288–96Google Scholar
Teaima, AA, Elnashar, AA, Hakim, EK, Hadaey, HS. Comparison of the efficacy of cochlear implantation and stapes surgery in far advanced otosclerosis: a meta-analysis study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023;280:77–88Google Scholar
Kabbara, B, Gauche, C, Calmels, MN, Lepage, B, Escude, B, Deguine, O, et al. Decisive criteria between stapedotomy and cochlear implantation in patients with far advanced otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:e73–8Google Scholar
Abdurehim, Y, Lehmann, A, Zeitouni, AG. Stapedotomy vs cochlear implantation for advanced otosclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;155:764–70Google Scholar
Marshall, AH, Fanning, N, Symons, S, Shipp, D, Chen, JM, Nedzelski, JM. Cochlear implantation in cochlear otosclerosis. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1728–33Google Scholar
Ricci, G, Lapenna, R, Gambacorta, V, Della Volpe, A, Faralli, M, Di Stadio, A. OTOPLAN, cochlear implant, and far-advanced otosclerosis: could the use of software improve the surgical final indication? J Int Adv Otol 2022;18:74–8Google Scholar
Skarzynski, PH, Pastuszak, A, Gos, E, Lorens, A, Kolodziejak, A, Obrycka, A, et al. Outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with far-advanced otosclerosis who had previously undergone stapes surgery. J Int Adv Otol 2024;20:101–7Google Scholar