Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T12:10:39.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Atrazine on Catalase and Peroxidase in Resistant and Susceptible Lines of Corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Emory Ford Eastin ,
Rupert D. Palmer  and
C. O. Grogan
Emory Ford Eastin
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Science
Rupert D. Palmer
Affiliation:
Plant Pathology and Weed Science, Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, State College, Mississippi
C. O. Grogan
Affiliation:
Mississippi State University and Agronomist, Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture
Get access

Abstract

Catalase and peroxidase activities were run at several ages on two lines of corn (Zea mays L.)—GT112 RfRf, resistant, and GT112, susceptible to 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine (atrazine). Atrazine significantly decreased catalase activity in GT112, while in treated GT112 RfRf catalase activity was usually significantly increased. Catalase activity was higher in GT112 RfRf than in GT112 for both treatments at all ages. GT112 RfRf had a higher peroxidase activity than GT112 when both were untreated, but when treated with atrazine there was no overall trend.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 1964 , pp. 64 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Allen, , Sherrill, W., and Palmer, Rupert D. 1963. The mode of action of simazine in barley. Weeds 11:27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Crafts, A. S. 1961. The chemistry and mode of action of herbicides. Interscience Publishers, New York. 269 p.Google Scholar
3. Eastin, Emory Ford, Palmer, Rupert D., and Grogan, C. O. 1963. Mode of action of atrazine and simazine in susceptible and resistant lines of corn. Weeds 12:49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Feinstein, R. N. 1949. Perborate as a substrate in a new assay of catalase. J. Biol. Chem. 180:1197–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Funderburk, H. H. Jr. and Davis, D. E. 1963. The metabolism of C14 chain- and ring-labeled simazine by corn and the effect of atrazine on plant respiratory systems. Weeds 11:101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Grogan, C. O., Eastin, Emory Ford, and Palmer, Rupert D. 1963. Inheritance of susceptibility of a line of maize to simazine and atrazine. Crop Science 3:451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Stutz, R. E. 1957. The indole-3-acetic acid oxidase of Lupinus albus L. Plant Physiol. 32:31–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed