Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-5flt4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-28T09:14:04.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Termination of a simulated failed corn stand and timing interval for replanting corn or soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2025

Gregory A. Mangialardi
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS, USA:
Jason A. Bond*
Affiliation:
Professor, Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS, USA
Drew M. Gholson
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS, USA
Tom W. Allen
Affiliation:
Professor, Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS, USA
Justin M. McCoy
Affiliation:
Former Assistant Professor, Northeast Regional Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Verona, MS, USA
Hunter D. Bowman
Affiliation:
Former Assistant Professor, Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS, USA
Franklin R. Kelly
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Research Assistant, Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Jason A. Bond, Extension/Research Professor, Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, PO Box 197, Stoneville, MS 38776. Email: jbond@drec.msstate.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Termination of an existing failed corn stand before replanting is essential. Two studies were conducted in Stoneville and Verona, MS, from 2020 to 2021 to evaluate timing of corn or soybean replanting following different herbicide treatments applied to simulated failed stands of corn. Treatments included paraquat alone at 841 g ai ha−1, paraquat at 841 g ha−1 + metribuzin at 211 g ai ha−1, and clethodim at 51 g ai ha−1 + glyphosate at 1,121 g ae ha−1 applied at the V2 growth stage. Replant timings were 1 and 7 d after herbicide treatment (DAT). Pooled across replant timings, paraquat + metribuzin provided the greatest control 3 DAT compared with other treatments in both studies. At 14 and 21 DAT, clethodim + glyphosate controlled more corn than did paraquat + metribuzin and paraquat alone. Control of a simulated failed corn stand with paraquat alone never exceeded 50% at 3 to 21 DAT. Soybean yield in all plots receiving herbicide treatment targeting simulated failed corn stands were similar and ≥2,150 kg ha−1. When applied at the V2 corn growth stage, both clethodim + glyphosate and paraquat + metribuzin controlled a simulated failed stand of corn. This study demonstrated the importance of terminating failed stands of corn before replanting because of dramatic reductions in yield in the plots not treated with herbicide.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America