Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-rkzlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T10:48:12.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Giant Foxtail (Seteria faberi) Seedling Assay for Resistance to Sethoxydim

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Julie Retrum  and
Frank Forcella
Julie Retrum
Affiliation:
Division of Science, University of Minnesota-Morris
Frank Forcella*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, Morris, MN 56267
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: forcella@morris.ars.usda.gov.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Repeated application of acetyl-coA carboxylase–inhibiting herbicides, such as sethoxydim, may select for resistant (R) weed populations, making a rapid and reliable seedling bioassay a useful tool. Such a bioassay was developed to determine shoot and root responses of giant foxtail seedlings to sethoxydim. Root and shoot elongation of susceptible (S) and R giant foxtail seedlings was measured at 3 and 6 d after exposure to 0.1 to 100 mg/L sethoxydim. A bioassay concentration of 10 mg/L sethoxydim easily discriminated between S and R biotypes of giant foxtail at 6 d after exposure, with R:S shoot and root growth ratios of 3 and 10, respectively.

Keywords

Sethoxydimgiant foxtail, Seteria faberi Herrm. #3 SETFAACCase inhibitorbioassayACCase, acetyl-coA carboxylaseDAT, days after treatmentR, resistant; S, susceptible

Information

Type
Note
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 2002 , pp. 464 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Boutsalis, P. 2001. Syngenta Quick Test: a rapid whole-plant test for herbicide resistance. Weed Technol. 15: 257–263.Google Scholar
Heap, I. and Knight, R. 1986. The occurrence of herbicide cross-resistance in a population of annual ryegrass, Lolium rigidum, resistant to diclofop-methyl. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 37: 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I., Shaner, D., Boutsalis, P., Retzinger, J., and Smeda, R. 2001. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds: Web page: http://www.weedscience.org/in.asp.Google Scholar
Letouze, A. and Gasquez, J. 1999. A rapid reliable test for screening aryloxyphenoxy-propionic acid resistance within Alopecurus myosuroides and Lolium spp. populations. Weed Res. 39: 37–48.Google Scholar
Letouze, A. and Gasquez, J. 2000. A pollen test to detect ACCase target-site resistance within Alopecurus myosuroides populations. Weed Res. 40: 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, B. G., Friesen, L. F., Beaulieu, K. J., and Morrison, I. N. 1996. A seed bioassay to identify acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor resistant wild oat (Avena fatua) populations. Weed Technol. 10: 85–89.Google Scholar
Stoltenberg, D. E. and Wiederholt, R. J. 1995. Giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclo-hexanedione herbicides. Weed Sci. 43: 527–535.Google Scholar