Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T19:22:26.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Clethodim on Seedhead Density, Forage Yield, and Quality of Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John H. Reynolds ,
William A. Krueger  and
Cynthia L. Walker
John H. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
William A. Krueger
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Cynthia L. Walker
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Clethodim was applied to tall fescue to determine the effects of application timing (fall, early spring, mid-spring), rate (0, 5.6, 11.2, or 22.4 g ai ha−1), and use of crop oil (0 or 2.3 L ha−1) on seedhead density and forage yield and quality of tall fescue. Increasing the rate of clethodim or adding crop oil reduced seedhead density and forage yield, and generally improved forage quality. There was no effect of application date in 1988 and 1990, but seedhead density and forage yield decreased from the November to the March application date in 1989.

Keywords

Clethodim, (E,E)-(+)-2[1[[(3-chloro-2-propenyl)oxy]imino]propyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onetall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb. ‘Kentucky 31’Plant growth regulatorsseedhead suppression

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 751 - 755
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Brewster, B. D. and Spinney, R. L. 1989. Control of seedling grasses with postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:39–43.Google Scholar
2. Duell, R. 1989. PGRs for turfgrass management. Plant Growth Regul. Soc. Am. Q. 17 (1):1–9.Google Scholar
3. Elkins, D. M., Vandeventer, J. M., and Briskovich, M. A. 1977. Effect of chemical growth retardants on turfgrass morphology. Agron. J. 69:458–461.Google Scholar
4. Gerrish, J. R. and Dougherty, C. T. 1983. Tall fescue sward response to mefluidide and nitrogen. Agron. J. 75:895–898.Google Scholar
5. Glenn, S., Glenn, B., Rieck, C. E., Ely, D. G., and Bush, L. P. 1981. Chemical quality, in vitro cellulose digestion, and yield of tall fescue forage affected by mefluidide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 29:1158–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Glenn, S., Rieck, C. E., Ely, D. G., and Bush, L. P. 1980. Quality of tall fescue forage affected by mefluidide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:391–393.Google Scholar
7. Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. U.S. Dep. Agric. Handb. 379. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
8. Johnson, B. J. 1989. Response of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) to plant growth regulators and mowing frequency. Weed Technol 3:54–39.Google Scholar
9. Krueger, W. A. and Reynolds, J. H. 1986. Herbicide effects on growth and forage quality of tall fescue and bermudagrass. Proc. Plant Growth Regul. Soc. Am. p. 46–52.Google Scholar
10. McCarty, L. B., DiPaola, J. M., Lewis, W. M., and Gilbert, W. B. 1985. Tall fescue response to plant growth retardants and fertilizer sources. Agron. J. 77:476–480.Google Scholar
11. Rendina, A. R. and Felts, J. M. 1988. Cyclohexanedione herbicides are selective and potent inhibitors of acetyl-Co A carboxylase from grasses. Plant Physiol. 86:983–986.Google Scholar
12. Reynolds, J. H., Krueger, W. A., Walker, C. L., and Waller, J. C. 1993. Plant growth regulator effects on growth and forage quality of tall fescue. Agron. J. 85:545–548.Google Scholar
13. Robb, T. W., Ely, D. G., Rieck, C. E., Glenn, S., Kitchen, L., Glenn, B. P., and Thomas, R. J. 1983. Beef production from tall fescue treated with mefluidide, a chemical plant-growth regulator. p. 725–728 in Smith, J. A. and Hays, V. W., eds. Proc. 14th Int. Grassland Congr. Lexington, KY. 15-24 June, 1987. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
14. Robb, T. W., Ely, D. G., Rieck, C. E., Thomas, R. J., Glenn, B. P., and Glenn, S. 1982. Mefluidide treatment of tall fescue: Effect on nutrient utilization. J. Anim. Sci. 54:155–163.Google Scholar
15. Roberts, C. A. and Moore, K. J. 1990. Chemical regulation of tall fescue reproductive development and quality with amidochlor. Agron. J. 82:523–526.Google Scholar
16. Schepers, J. S., Francis, D. D., and Thompson, M. T. 1989. Simultaneous determination of total C., total N, and 15N on soil and plant material. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 20:949–959.Google Scholar
17. Sheaffer, C. C. and Marten, G. C. 1986. Effect of mefluidide on cool-season perennial grass forage yield and quality. Agron. J. 78:75–79.Google Scholar
18. Slade, J. J. and Reynolds, J. H. 1985. Plant growth regulator effects on forage quality of tall fescue and bermudagrass. Tennessee Farm & Home Sci. No. 134:19–23.Google Scholar
19. Stoltenberg, D. E., Gronwald, J. W., Wyse, D. L., Burton, J. D., Somers, D. A., and Gengenbach, B. G. 1989. Effect of sethoxydim and haloxyfop on acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase activity in Festuca species. Weed Sci. 37:512–516.Google Scholar
20. Valent U.S.A. Corp. 1992. Product bulletin Select 2 EC herbicide. 4 p. Valent U.S.A. Corp. Walnut Creek, CA.Google Scholar
21. Van Soest, P. J. and Robertson, J. B. 1979. Systems of analysis for evaluating fibrous feeds. p. 49–60 in Pigden, W. J., Balch, C. C., and Graham, M., eds. Standardization of analytical methodology for feeds. Int. Dev. Res. Center. Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
22. Watschke, T. L., Prinster, M. G., and Breuninger, J. M. 1992. Plant growth regulators and turfgrass management. p. 557–588 in Waddington, D. V., Carrow, R. N., and Shearman, R. C., eds. Turfgrass—Agronomy Monograph no. 32. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America. Madison, WI.Google Scholar