Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-kl2l2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-20T21:40:32.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Chlorimuron Applied Postemergence to Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael G. Patterson ,
C. Dale Monks ,
Thomas Rayburn  and
Glenn Wehtje
Michael G. Patterson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils and Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
C. Dale Monks
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. GA.; Athens, GA 30602
Thomas Rayburn
Affiliation:
Cotton Gin Lab., Stoneville, MS 38776
Glenn Wehtje
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils and Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chlorimuron applied postemergence at 2.2, 4.4, 8.8, 18, and 35 g ai/ha to cotton at either the 4-leaf, pinhead-square, first-bloom, or full-bloom growth stage was evaluated for potential as a plant growth regulator. Chlorimuron did not reduce bolls per plant at any rate or time of application, but the proportion of open to closed bolls decreased as rate increased. Seed cotton yields decreased with increasing chlorimuron rate and cotton age. The use of chlorimuron as a plant growth regulator for cotton appears limited.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘DPL 50’ ♯3 GOSHIPlant growth regulatorPGRsulfonylureaGossypium hirsutumGOSHI

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 314 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. P. 118–189 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., ed. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
2. Drexler, D. M. 1982. The bioactivity of chlorsulfuron. M.S. thesis, Univ. Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
3. Ray, T. B. 1982. The mode of action of chlorsulfuron: a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:10–17.Google Scholar
4. Rost, T. L. 1984. The comparative cell cycle and metabolic effects of chemical treatments on root tip meristems. III. Chlorsulfuron. J. Plant Growth Regul. 3:51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Schott, P. E., and Schroeder, M. 1979. Modification of the growth of Gossypium spp. by the plant growth regulator mepiquat chloride. Proc. 9th Int. Congr. Plant Prot., Washington, DC.Google Scholar