Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-smtgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-07T09:37:34.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Genetic Background in Fitness Cost Studies: An Example from Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Darci Giacomini ,
Philip Westra  and
Sarah M. Ward
Darci Giacomini*
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Philip Westra
Affiliation:
Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Sarah M. Ward
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: dagiac@rams.colostate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since its discovery in 2005, glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth has become a major problem for many farmers in the southern United States. One mechanism of resistance found in a Georgia population of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth is amplification of the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) gene throughout the genome, with some resistant plants containing and expressing more than 100 EPSPS genes. Such high numbers of EPSPS genes and protein production could result in a fitness cost to resistant plants due to (1) metabolic cost of overproduction of this enzyme and (2) disruption of other genes after insertion of the EPSPS gene. A greenhouse experiment was set up to investigate differences in growth and reproduction between glyphosate-susceptible and -resistant Palmer amaranth plants. Measurements included growth rate, plant height/volume ratio, final biomass, photosynthetic rate, inflorescence length, pollen viability, and seed set. This study found no significant fitness costs for plants with the resistance trait. This study also provided a clear example of how controlling for genetic background is important in fitness cost studies and how potentially misleading results can be obtained if only a few fitness traits are measured. These results indicate that glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth plants with high EPSPS gene copy numbers are likely to persist in field populations, even in the absence of glyphosate, potentially leading to long-term loss of glyphosate as a control option for Palmer amaranth.

Keywords

GlyphosatePalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats AMAPA5-Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthaseEPSPS amplificationherbicide resistance

Information

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 29 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Bagavathiannan, MV, Norsworthy, JK, Jha, P, Smith, KL (2011) Does resistance to propanil or clomazone alter the growth and competitive abilities of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). Weed Sci. 59:353–358 Google Scholar
Baucom, RS, Mauricio, R (2004) Fitness costs and benefits of novel herbicide tolerance in a noxious weed. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 101:13386–13390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussler, BH, Maxwell, BD, Puettmann, KJ (1995) Using plant volume to quantify interference in corn (Zea mays) neighborhoods. Weed Sci. 43:586–594 Google Scholar
Chandi, A, Milla-Lewis, SR, Jordan, DL, York, AC, Burton, JD, Zuleta, MC, Whitaker, JR, Culpepper, AS (2013) Use of AFLP markers to assess genetic diversity in Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) populations from North Carolina and Georgia. Weed Sci. 61:136–145 Google Scholar
Clements, DR, DiTommaso, A, Jordan, N, Booth, BD, Cardina, J, Doohan, D, Mohler, CL, Murphy, SD, Swanton, CJ (2004) Adaptability of plants invading North American cropland. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 104:379–398 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Vencill, WK, Kichler, JM, Webster, TM, Brown, SM, York, AC, Davis, JW, Hanna, WW (2006) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci. 54:620–626 Google Scholar
Gaines, TA, Zhang, W, Wang, D, Bukun, B, Chisholm, ST, Shaner, DL, Nissen, SJ, Patzoldt, WL, Tranel, PJ, Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Webster, TM, Vencill, WK, Sammons, RD, Jiang, J, Preston, C, Leach, JE, Westra, P (2010) Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:1029–1034 Google Scholar
Gossett, BJ, Murdock, EC, Toler, JE (1992) Resistance of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to the dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Technol 6:587–591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J, Segel, LA (1990) Modeling the effectiveness of herbicide resistance and mixtures as strategies to delay or preclude resistance. Weed Technol 4:186–198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2012) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Available at www.weedscience.com. Accessed December 29, 2012.Google Scholar
Hedrick, P. W. (2005) Genetics of Populations. 3rd edn. Sudbury, MA Jones and Bartlett. 736 pGoogle Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J, Heslop-Harrison, Y (1970) Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence: intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. Stain Tech 45:115–120 Google Scholar
Horak, MJ, Peterson, DE (1995) Biotypes of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol 9:192–195 Google Scholar
Menalled, FD, Smith, RG (2007) Competitiveness of herbicide-resistant and herbicide-susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.) under contrasting management practices. Weed Biol Manag. 7:115–119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neve, P, Norsworthy, JK, Smith, KL, Zelaya, IA (2010) Modeling evolution and management of glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri . Weed Res 51:99–112 Google Scholar
Paris, M, Roux, F, Berard, A, Reboud, X (2008) The effects of the genetic background on herbicide resistance fitness cost and its associated dominance in Arabidopsis thaliana . Heredity 101:499–506 Google Scholar
Pederson, BP, Neve, P, Andreasen, C, Powles, SB (2007) Ecological fitness of a glyphosate-resistant Lolium rigidum population: growth and seed production along a competition gradient. Basic Appl Ecol 8:258–268 Google Scholar
Preston, C, Wakelin, AM (2008) Resistance to glyphosate from altered herbicide translocation patterns. Pest Manag Sci. 64:372–376 Google Scholar
Raymond, B, Wright, DJ, Bonsall, MB (2010) Effects of host plant and genetic background on the fitness costs of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis . Heredity 106:281–288 Google Scholar
Reboud, X, Till-Bottraud, I (1991) The cost of herbicide resistance measured by a competition experiment. Theor Appl Genet 82:690–696 Google Scholar
Richter, O, Zwerger, P, Bottcher, U (2002) Modeling spatio-temporal dynamics of herbicide resistance. Weed Res 42:52–64 Google Scholar
Salas, RA, Dayan, FE, Pan, Z, Watson, SB, Dickson, JW, Scott, RC, Burgos, NR (2012) EPSPS gene amplification in glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum) from Arkansas. Pest Manag Sci. 68:1223–1230 Google Scholar
Shaner, D, Nadler-Hassar, T, Henry, WB, Kroger, C (2005) A rapid in vivo shikimate accumulation assay with excised leaf discs. Weed Sci. 53:769–774 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL, Lindenmeyer, RB, Ostlie, MH (2012) What have the mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate taught us? Pest Manag Sci. 68:3–9 Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Webster, TM (2012) Compensatory growth in Palmer amaranth: effects on weed seed production and crop yield. Pages 99 p in Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science. Reno, NV Western Society of Weed Science.Google Scholar
Steckel, LE (2007) The dioecious Amaranthus spp.: here to stay. Weed Technol 21:567–570 Google Scholar
Steinrucken, HC, Amrhein, N (1980) The herbicide glyphosate is a potent inhibitor of 5-enolpyruvylshikimic acid-3-phosphate synthase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 94:1207–1212 Google Scholar
Vila-Aiub, MM, Neve, P, Powles, SB (2009) Fitness costs associated with evolved herbicide resistance alleles in plants. New Phytol 184:751–767 Google Scholar
Vila-Aiub, MM, Neve, P, Steadman, KJ, Powles, SB (2005) Ecological fitness of a multiple herbicide-resistant Lolium rigidum population: dynamics of seed germination and seedling emergence of resistant and susceptible phenotypes. J Appl Ecol 42:288–298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, SM, Webster, TM, Steckel, LE (2013) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): a review. Weed Technol 27:12–27 Google Scholar
Wiersma, A (2012) Regional Whole Plant and Molecular Response of Kochia scoparia to Glyphosate. . Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University. 64 pGoogle Scholar