Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-tfzs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-02T07:07:41.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Plant Nitrogen Concentration on the Response ofGlyphosate-Resistant Corn Hybrids and Their Progeny to Clethodim andGlufosinate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ryan M. Terry ,
Paul T. Marquardt ,
James J. Camberato  and
William G. Johnson
Ryan M. Terry
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, 915 W. State Street, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Paul T. Marquardt
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, 915 W. State Street, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
James J. Camberato
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, 915 W. State Street, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
William G. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, 915 W. State Street, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: wgj@purdue.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rapid adoption of glyphosate-resistant (GR) corn hybrids has led to thereemergence of volunteer corn as a problematic weed in soybean and has madecontrolling the initial stand of corn in a replant situation more difficult.If volunteer corn in soybean or the initial corn stand in a replantsituation is not controlled, yield loss can occur. Clethodim and glufosinateare often used to control GR corn in corn replant situations and in soybean.The objectives of this research were to evaluate the response of two hybridcorn varieties and their F2 progeny to clethodim and glufosinateand to evaluate the effect of plant nitrogen (N) concentration on clethodimand glufosinate efficacy. First, a dose-response study was conducted withclethodim and glufosinate on DeKalb 60-18 and 60-18F2, and DeKalb63-42 and 63-42F2 to compare the response of the hybrids andtheir F2 progeny to the herbicides. DeKalb 63-42 was moretolerant to clethodim than 60-18 and 60-18F2. No differences werefound between the hybrids and their respective F2 progeny in theresponse to clethodim or glufosinate. In a second dose-response studyassessing the effect of N conditions on herbicide efficacy, both clethodimand glufosinate were less injurious to plants growing in low N than in highN availability.

Keywords

Clethodimglufosinatecorn Zea mays Lsoybean Glycine max (L.) MerrDose-responseglyphosate-resistant volunteer cornnitrogen

Information

Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 121 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Andersen, R. N. and Geadelmann, J. L. 1982. The effect of parentage on the control of volunteer corn (Zea mays) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 2:127–131.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. M., Swanton, C. J., Hall, J. C., and Mersey, B. G. 1993. The influence of temperature and relative humidity on the efficacy of glufosinate-ammonium. Weed Res. 33:139–147.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2008a. Select Max herbicide 2EE product label. Walnut Creek, CA Valent USA. 2 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2008b. Ignite 280 SL herbicide product label. Research Triangle Park, NC Bayer CropScience. 4 p.Google Scholar
Beckett, T. H. and Stoller, E. W. 1988. Volunteer corn (Zea mays) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36:159–166.Google Scholar
Bromilow, R. H., Chamberlain, K., Tench, A. J., and Williams, R. H. 1993. Phloem translocation of strong acids-glyphosate, substituted phosphonic and sulfonic acids in Ricinus communis L. Pestic. Sci. 37:39–47.Google Scholar
Carter, P. R., Nafziger, E. D., and Hicks, D. R. 1992. Effects of Uneven Seedling Emergence in Corn. http://www.ces.purdue.edu/extmedia/NCH/NCH-36.html. Accessed: July 31, 2009.Google Scholar
Cathcart, R. J., Chandler, K., and Swanton, C. J. 2004. Fertilizer nitrogen rate and the response of weeds to herbicides. Weed Sci. 51:291–296.Google Scholar
Coetzer, E., Al-Khatib, K., and Loughin, T. M. 2001. Glufosinate efficacy, absorption, and translocation in amaranth as affected by relative humidity and temperature. Weed Sci. 49:8–13.Google Scholar
Davis, V. M., Marquardt, P. T., and Johnson, W. G. 2008. Volunteer corn in northern Indiana soybean fields correlates to glyphosate-resistant corn adoption. Online. Crop Management. DOI:.Google Scholar
Dickson, R. L., Andrews, M., Field, R. J., and Dickson, E. L. 1990. Effect of water stress, nitrogen, and gibberellic acid on fluazifop and glyphosate activity on oats (Avena sativa) . Weed Sci. 38:54–61.Google Scholar
Issac, R. A. and Johnson, W. C. 1976. Determination of total nitrogen in plant tissue. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 59:98–100.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Streibig, J. C., and Ritz, C. 2007. Utilizing R software package for dose-response studies: the concept and data analysis. Weed Technol. 21:840–848.Google Scholar
Kucharik, C. J. 2006. A multidecadal trend of earlier corn planting in the central USA. Agron. J. 98:1544–1550.Google Scholar
Liu, W., Tollenaar, M., Stewart, G., and Deen, W. 2004. Response of corn grain yield to spatial and temporal variability in emergence. Crop Sci. 44:847–854.Google Scholar
Magulama, E. E. 2009. Inheritance of glyphosate resistance trait and its yield expression in three-way cross maize hybrids. USM R & D. 1:39–43.Google Scholar
Malcolm, S. and Aillery, M. 2009. Growing crops for biofuel has spillover effects. Amber Waves. 7:10–15. http://www.ers.usda.gov/AmberWaves/March09/PDF/Biofuels.pdf. Accessed: November 9, 2011.Google Scholar
Mithila, J., Swanton, C. J., Blackshaw, R. E., Cathcart, R. J., and Hall, J. C. 2008. Physiological basis for reduced glyphosate efficacy on weeds grown under low soil nitrogen. Weed Sci. 56:12–17.Google Scholar
Nafziger, E. D., Carter, P. R., and Graham, E. E. 1991. Response of corn to uneven emergence. Crop Sci. 31:811–815.Google Scholar
Parker, W. B., Marshall, L. C., Burton, J. D., Somers, D. A., Wyse, D. L., Gronwald, J. W., and Gengenback, B. G. 1990. Dominant mutations causing alterations in acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase confer tolerance to cyclohexanedione and aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:7175–7179.Google Scholar
Pornprom, T., Chompoo, J., and Grace, B. 2003. Glufosinate tolerance in hybrid corn varieties based on decreasing ammonia accumulation. Weed Biol. Manag. 3:41–45.Google Scholar
Ramsey, R. J. L., Stephenson, G. R., and Hall, J. C. 2002. Effect of relative humidity on the uptake, translocation, and efficacy of glufosinate ammonium in wild oat (Avena fatua). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 73:1–8.Google Scholar
Randall, G. W., Vetsch, J. A., and Huffman, J. R. 2003. Corn production on a subsurface-drained mollisol as affected by time of nitrogen application and nitrapyrin. Agron. J. 95:1213–1219.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J., and Benson, G. O. 1992. How a Corn Plant Develops (SP-48). Iowa State University. http://www.extension.iastate.edu/hancock/info/corn.htm. Accessed: October 19, 2009.Google Scholar
Steckel, G. J., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Absorption and translocation of glufosinate in four weed species. Weed Sci. 45:378–381.Google Scholar
Steckel, L. E., Thompson, M. A., and Hayes, R. M. 2009. Herbicide options for controlling glyphosate-tolerant corn in a corn replant situation. Weed Technol. 23:243–246.Google Scholar
Tachibana, K. and Kaneko, K. 1986. Development of a new herbicide, bialaphos. J. Pestic. Sci. 11:297–304.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Economic Research Service. 2010. Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/biotechcrops. Accessed: February 15, 2011.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture–National Agriculture Statistical Service. 2010. Acreage Report, 6.30.2010. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1000. Accessed: February 15, 2011.Google Scholar