Hostname: page-component-84c44f86f4-9954g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T20:41:45.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asulam Controls Western Bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) on Forest Land in Western Oregon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. E. Stewart ,
A. W. Cooley  and
A. Guardigli
R. E. Stewart
Affiliation:
Timber Manage. Res., U.S. Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Washington, D.C. 20013
A. W. Cooley
Affiliation:
Rhodia, Inc., Agric. Div., Monmouth, Junction, NJ 08852
A. Guardigli
Affiliation:
Rhodia, Inc., Agric. Div., Monmouth, Junction, NJ 08852
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aerial sprays of asulam (methyl sulfanilylcarbamate) applied at 3.4 or 6.7 kg/ha to forest plantations in western Oregon effectively controlled western bracken [Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn var. pubescens Underw.] without damaging Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] seedlings. Asulam also did not damage noble fir (Abies procera Rehd.) seedlings if applied without a surfactant. The half-life of asulam in forest soils ranged from less than 7 to 18 days and vertical movement in the soil profile was minimal. No herbicide residues were found in runoff water from treated areas up to 208 days after application.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , November 1979 , pp. 589 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Ball, R. W. E., Pink, R. B., and Brockelsby, C. H. 1974. Some environmental aspects of the use of asulam for bracken control in upland areas. Proc. 12th Brit. Weed Control Conf. pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
2. Dimock, E. J. II. 1964. Supplemental treatments to aid planted Douglas-fir in dense bracken fern. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Note PNW-11. Pacific Northwest For. and Range Exp. Stn., Portland, Oreg. 10 pp.Google Scholar
3. Gallo, M. A., Guardigli, A., and McGinnis, C. H. Jr. 1975. Effect of asulam in wildlife species — residues and toxicity in Bobwhite quail after prolonged exposure. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 13(2):200–205.Google Scholar
4. Harr, R. D. 1976. Hydrology of small forest streams in western Oregon. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-55. Pacific Northwest For. and Range Exp. Stn., Portland, Oreg. 15 pp.Google Scholar
5. Holroyd, J., Parker, C., and Rowlands, A. 1970. Asulam for the control of bracken (Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn). Proc. 10th Brit. Weed Control Conf. pp. 371–376.Google Scholar
6. Ingham, B., and Gallo, M. A. 1975. Effect of asulam in wildlife species — acute toxicity to birds and fish. Bull. Environ. Contamin. Toxicil. 13(2):194–199.Google Scholar
7. Isaac, L. A. 1940. Vegetative succession following logging in the Douglas-fir region with special reference to fire. J. For. 38:716–721.Google Scholar
8. Martin, R. J. 1977. Control of bracken (Pteridium esculentum G. Forst (Cockayne) in pastures with asulam. Weed Res. 17:49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Smith, D. T., and Wiese, A. F. 1972. Techniques for sampling soil and water for herbicide residues. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 1972:43–44.Google Scholar
10. Soper, D. 1972. Review of bracken control experiments with asulam. Proc. 11th Brit. Weed Control Conf. pp. 24–31.Google Scholar
11. Staebler, G. R., Lauterbach, P., and Moore, A. W. 1954. Effect of animal damage on a young coniferous plantation in southwestern Washington. J. For. 52:730–733.Google Scholar
12. Stewart, R. E. 1976. Herbicides for control of western swordfern and western bracken. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Note PNW-284. Pacific Northwest For. and Range Exp. Stn., Portland, Oreg. 10 pp.Google Scholar
13. Wasmuth, A. G. 1973. The release of Pinus radiata from bracken with asulam. New Zealand J. For. 18(2):279–284.Google Scholar
14. Worthington, N. P. 1955. A comparison of conifers planted on the Hemlock Experimental Forest. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Note PNW-111. Pacific Northwest For. and Range Exp. Stn., Portland, Oreg. 5 pp.Google Scholar