Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-9rk55 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-28T02:27:00.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germination and Emergence of Burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. K. Mann ,
C. E. Rieck  and
W. W. Witt
R. K. Mann
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
C. E. Rieck
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
W. W. Witt
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mechanical scarification of burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus L.) seeds resulted in increased water absorption and germination. Burcucumber germination occurred at temperatures ranging from 15 to 35 C with optimum germination occurring from 20 to 30 C. Scarified burcucumber seeds were more sensitive to simulated moisture stress than were either soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Williams’] or corn [Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer Brand 3369A’]. Regardless of osmotic potential, intact burcucumber seeds did not germinate; scarified seeds germinated at osmotic potentials to −6 bars. Cold stratification at 4 C for 18 weeks modified seedcoat permeability so that 11% of non-scarified burcucumber seeds germinated. Increasing depth of planting decreased emergence with limited emergence occurring at depths of 15 and 16 cm in field and growth chamber studies, respectively.

Keywords

Scarificationcold stratificationplanting depth

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 83 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Barber, K. G. 1909. Comparative histology of fruits and seeds of certain species of cucurbitaceae. Bot. Gaz. 47:296–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Britton, N. L. and Brown, A. 1947. An Illustrated Flora of the Northern United States, Canada, and the British possessions. 2nd ed. Vol. 3, p. 293. Lancaster Press, Inc., Lancaster, PA.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A. 1977. Weed biology and competition. Pages 25–41 in Truelove, B., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science, 2nd ed., South Weed Sci. Soc., Auburn, Alabama.Google Scholar
4. Hoveland, C. S. and Buchanan, G. A. 1977. Weed seed germination under simulated drought. Weed Sci. 21:322–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Michel, B. E. and Kaufman, M. R. 1973. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiol. 51:914–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Palmer, R. D. 1979. Weed survey-southern states. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:111–136.Google Scholar
7. Parmar, M. T. and Moore, R. P. 1966. Effects of simulated drought by polyethylene glycol solution on corn (Zea mays L.) germination and seedling development. Agron. J. 58:391–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Torrey, J. and Gray, A. 1969. A Flora of North America. Vol. 1, pages 541–542. Hafner Publishing Co., New York.Google Scholar